Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D6 / Germany / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
Member State | Germany |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit |
Report date | 2020-02-17 |
Report access | DE_ART8_GES.xml |
Deutsche Ostsee (BALDE_MS)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Circalittoral mixed sediment |
Circalittoral mixed sediment |
Circalittoral mixed sediment |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Circalittoral sand |
Circalittoral sand |
Circalittoral sand |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
Baltic muddy bottoms of the aphotic zone |
Baltic muddy bottoms of the aphotic zone |
Baltic muddy bottoms of the aphotic zone |
Reefs |
Sandbanks which are slightly covered by seawater all the time |
Sublittoral coarse sediment |
Sublittoral coarse sediment |
Sublittoral coarse sediment |
[Zostera] beds in infralittoral sediments |
[Zostera] beds in infralittoral sediments |
[Zostera] beds in infralittoral sediments |
||
Element code |
HabBenCircalitMxdSed |
HabBenCircalitMxdSed |
HabBenCircalitMxdSed |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitRock |
HabBenCircalitRock |
HabBenCircalitRock |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitRock |
HabBenInfralitRock |
HabBenInfralitRock |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenInfralitSand |
A5.378 |
A5.378 |
A5.378 |
1170 |
1110 |
A5.1 |
A5.1 |
A5.1 |
A5.533 |
A5.533 |
A5.533 |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/eunishabitats/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/eunishabitats/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/eunishabitats/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000habitats/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000habitats/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/eunishabitats/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/eunishabitats/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/eunishabitats/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/eunishabitats/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/eunishabitats/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/eunishabitats/view
|
||
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
||||
Threshold value upper |
25.0 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
-1.0 |
-1.0 |
25.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
national
|
national
|
national
|
national
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
93.0 |
52.0 |
100.0 |
55.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
31.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
The HELCOM-developed indicator (Cumulative Impact on benthic biotopes) for the criteria D6C1, D6C2, D6C3 could not be used due to a lack of regionally agreed thresholds. In addition, the Baltic Sea Impact Index (BSII) developed descriptively by HELCOM and used descriptively for criterion D6C3 takes into account both the physical loss (criterion D6C1) and the physical disturbance (criterion D6C2), as provided for in Commission Decision 2017/848 / EU.
|
For the distribution and extension of the benthic habitat (criterion D6C4), for which the results of the evaluation of criterion D6C1 are also to be used, there is currently no applicable indicator available.
|
The status assessments of the relevant widespread benthic habitats were carried out separately for the individual territorial units (water bodies according to WFD, HELCOM basins outside the 1 nm zone, HD habitat type). These individual results based on existing assessment procedures were then aggregated for each of these habitats. Their respective area is in good condition within the spatial intersection of these territorial units if all the individual results available for them have reached their threshold values. If at least 50% of the occurrence area of a widespread benthic habitat was assessed in this way and if the good status is not found in less than 25% of this assessed area, then it is overall in a good status according to criterion D6C5.
|
The HELCOM-developed indicator (Cumulative Impact on benthic biotopes) for the criteria D6C1, D6C2, D6C3 could not be used due to a lack of regionally agreed thresholds. In addition, the Baltic Sea Impact Index (BSII) developed descriptively by HELCOM and used descriptively for criterion D6C3 takes into account both the physical loss (criterion D6C1) and the physical disturbance (criterion D6C2), as provided for in Commission Decision 2017/848 / EU.
|
For the distribution and extension of the benthic habitat (criterion D6C4), for which the results of the evaluation of criterion D6C1 are also to be used, there is currently no applicable indicator available.
|
The status assessments of the relevant widespread benthic habitats were carried out separately for the individual territorial units (water bodies according to WFD, HELCOM basins outside the 1 nm zone, HD habitat type). These individual results based on existing assessment procedures were then aggregated for each of these habitats. Their respective area is in good condition within the spatial intersection of these territorial units if all the individual results available for them have reached their threshold values. If at least 50% of the occurrence area of a widespread benthic habitat was assessed in this way and if the good status is not found in less than 25% of this assessed area, then it is overall in a good status according to criterion D6C5.
|
The HELCOM-developed indicator (Cumulative Impact on benthic biotopes) for the criteria D6C1, D6C2, D6C3 could not be used due to a lack of regionally agreed thresholds. In addition, the Baltic Sea Impact Index (BSII) developed descriptively by HELCOM and used descriptively for criterion D6C3 takes into account both the physical loss (criterion D6C1) and the physical disturbance (criterion D6C2), as provided for in Commission Decision 2017/848 / EU.
|
For the distribution and extension of the benthic habitat (criterion D6C4), for which the results of the evaluation of criterion D6C1 are also to be used, there is currently no applicable indicator available.
|
No self-assessment provided.
|
The HELCOM-developed indicator (Cumulative Impact on benthic biotopes) for the criteria D6C1, D6C2, D6C3 could not be used due to a lack of regionally agreed thresholds. In addition, the Baltic Sea Impact Index (BSII) developed descriptively by HELCOM and used descriptively for criterion D6C3 takes into account both the physical loss (criterion D6C1) and the physical disturbance (criterion D6C2), as provided for in Commission Decision 2017/848 / EU.
|
For the distribution and extension of the benthic habitat (criterion D6C4), for which the results of the evaluation of criterion D6C1 are also to be used, there is currently no applicable indicator available.
|
The status assessments of the relevant widespread benthic habitats were carried out separately for the individual territorial units (water bodies according to WFD, HELCOM basins outside the 1 nm zone, HD habitat type). These individual results based on existing assessment procedures were then aggregated for each of these habitats. Their respective area is in good condition within the spatial intersection of these territorial units if all the individual results available for them have reached their threshold values. If at least 50% of the occurrence area of a widespread benthic habitat was assessed in this way and if the good status is not found in less than 25% of this assessed area, then it is overall in a good status according to criterion D6C5.
|
The HELCOM-developed indicator (Cumulative Impact on benthic biotopes) for the criteria D6C1, D6C2, D6C3 could not be used due to a lack of regionally agreed thresholds. In addition, the Baltic Sea Impact Index (BSII) developed descriptively by HELCOM and used descriptively for criterion D6C3 takes into account both the physical loss (criterion D6C1) and the physical disturbance (criterion D6C2), as provided for in Commission Decision 2017/848 / EU.
|
For the distribution and extension of the benthic habitat (criterion D6C4), for which the results of the evaluation of criterion D6C1 are also to be used, there is currently no applicable indicator available.
|
The status assessments of the relevant widespread benthic habitats were carried out separately for the individual territorial units (water bodies according to WFD, HELCOM basins outside the 1 nm zone, HD habitat type). These individual results based on existing assessment procedures were then aggregated for each of these habitats. Their respective area is in good condition within the spatial intersection of these territorial units if all the individual results available for them have reached their threshold values. If at least 50% of the occurrence area of a widespread benthic habitat was assessed in this way and if the good status is not found in less than 25% of this assessed area, then it is overall in a good status according to criterion D6C5.
|
The HELCOM-developed indicator (Cumulative Impact on benthic biotopes) for the criteria D6C1, D6C2, D6C3 could not be used due to a lack of regionally agreed thresholds. In addition, the Baltic Sea Impact Index (BSII) developed descriptively by HELCOM and used descriptively for criterion D6C3 takes into account both the physical loss (criterion D6C1) and the physical disturbance (criterion D6C2), as provided for in Commission Decision 2017/848 / EU.
|
For the distribution and extension of the benthic habitat (criterion D6C4), for which the results of the evaluation of criterion D6C1 are also to be used, there is currently no applicable indicator available.
|
The status assessments of the relevant widespread benthic habitats were carried out separately for the individual territorial units (water bodies according to WFD, HELCOM basins outside the 1 nm zone, HD habitat type). These individual results based on existing assessment procedures were then aggregated for each of these habitats. Their respective area is in good condition within the spatial intersection of these territorial units if all the individual results available for them have reached their threshold values. If at least 50% of the occurrence area of a widespread benthic habitat was assessed in this way and if the good status is not found in less than 25% of this assessed area, then it is overall in a good status according to criterion D6C5.
|
The HELCOM-developed indicator (Cumulative Impact on benthic biotopes) for the criteria D6C1, D6C2, D6C3 could not be used due to a lack of regionally agreed thresholds. In addition, the Baltic Sea Impact Index (BSII) developed descriptively by HELCOM and used descriptively for criterion D6C3 takes into account both the physical loss (criterion D6C1) and the physical disturbance (criterion D6C2), as provided for in Commission Decision 2017/848 / EU.
|
For the distribution and extension of the benthic habitat (criterion D6C4), for which the results of the evaluation of criterion D6C1 are also to be used, there is currently no applicable indicator available.
|
No self-assessment provided.
|
The HELCOM-developed indicator (Cumulative Impact on benthic biotopes) for the criteria D6C1, D6C2, D6C3 could not be used due to a lack of regionally agreed thresholds. In addition, the Baltic Sea Impact Index (BSII) developed descriptively by HELCOM and used descriptively for criterion D6C3 takes into account both the physical loss (criterion D6C1) and the physical disturbance (criterion D6C2), as provided for in Commission Decision 2017/848 / EU.
|
For the distribution and extension of the benthic habitat (criterion D6C4), for which the results of the evaluation of criterion D6C1 are also to be used, there is currently no applicable indicator available.
|
The status assessments of the relevant widespread benthic habitats were carried out separately for the individual territorial units (water bodies according to WFD, HELCOM basins outside the 1 nm zone, HD habitat type). These individual results based on existing assessment procedures were then aggregated for each of these habitats. Their respective area is in good condition within the spatial intersection of these territorial units if all the individual results available for them have reached their threshold values. If at least 50% of the occurrence area of a widespread benthic habitat was assessed in this way and if the good status is not found in less than 25% of this assessed area, then it is overall in a good status according to criterion D6C5.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
No self-assessment provided.
|
No self-assessment provided.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
The HELCOM-developed indicator (Cumulative Impact on benthic biotopes) for the criteria D6C1, D6C2, D6C3 could not be used due to a lack of regionally agreed thresholds. Therefore, only a descriptive description based on the Baltic Sea Pressure and Impact Index has been included in the state analysis.
|
The HELCOM-developed indicator (Cumulative Impact on benthic biotopes) for the criteria D6C1, D6C2, D6C3 could not be used due to a lack of regionally agreed thresholds. Therefore, only a descriptive description based on the Baltic Sea Pressure and Impact Index has been included in the state analysis.
|
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
||
Description element |
Includes rocks and biogenic reefs of the Circalitoral and coarse sediments of the Circalitoral. No assessment provided.
|
Includes rocks and biogenic reefs of the Circalitoral and coarse sediments of the Circalitoral. No assessment provided.
|
Includes rocks and biogenic reefs of the Circalitoral and coarse sediments of the Circalitoral. No assessment provided.
|
Includes rocks and biogenic reefs of the Infralitorals as well as coarse sediments of the Infralitorals. No assessment provided.
|
Includes rocks and biogenic reefs of the Infralitorals as well as coarse sediments of the Infralitorals. No assessment provided.
|
Includes rocks and biogenic reefs of the Infralitorals as well as coarse sediments of the Infralitorals. No assessment provided.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
For FFH habitat types Sandbanks (EU-Code 1110) and Reefs (EU-Code 1170), which are considered to be particularly protected benthic habitats, the conservation status of the FFH assessment 2013 (https: //www.bfn .de / topics / natura-2000 / reports-monitoring / national-ffh-report.html). There is no evaluation of the individual criteria.
|
For FFH habitat types Sandbanks (EU-Code 1110) and Reefs (EU-Code 1170), which are considered to be particularly protected benthic habitats, the conservation status of the FFH assessment 2013 (https: //www.bfn .de / topics / natura-2000 / reports-monitoring / national-ffh-report.html). There is no evaluation of the individual criteria.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
At the moment, the element can not be evaluated due to insufficient data or missing evaluation concept.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
The assessments by the Habitats and Habitats Directives evaluate a period of 2007-2012, HELCOM (HOLAS II - First version 2017) assesses a period of 2011-2015.
|
No self-assessment provided
|
No self-assessment provided
|
Assessments period |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2007-2015 |
2011-2015 |
2011-2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|