MS/Art8/2018/D1-B/Denmark/NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea — Marine Information System for Europe

Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-B / Denmark / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due	2018-10-15
GES Descriptor	D1 Birds
Member State	Denmark
Region/subregion	NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Reported by	Danish Environmental Protection Agency
Report date	2019-08-30
Report access	DK_ART8_GES_Merge_20190829.xml

Danish part of Atlantic North Sea from coastline to EEZ. Data covers DK-TOTAL. (DK-TOTAL-part-ANS)

Simplified table

GES component	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B
Feature	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds
Element	Aythya ferina	Aythya ferina	Aythya ferina	Aythya fuligula	Aythya fuligula	Aythya fuligula	Aythya marila	Bucephala clangula	Bucephala clangula	Bucephala clangula	Clangula hyemalis	Melanitta fusca	Melanitta nigra	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Anas acuta	Anas acuta	Anas acuta	Anas clypeata	Anas clypeata	Anas penelope	Anas penelope	Anas penelope	Anas platyrhynchos	Anas platyrhynchos	Anas platyrhynchos	Anser albifrons	Anser anser	Anser anser	Anser anser	Branta canadensis	Branta canadensis	Branta leucopsis	Branta leucopsis	Branta leucopsis	Cygnus columbianus	Cygnus cygnus	Cygnus olor	Cygnus olor	Cygnus olor	Fulica atra	Fulica atra	Fulica atra	Alca torda	Alca torda	Cepphus grylle	Cepphus grylle	Gavia arctica	Gavia stellata	Mergellus albellus	Mergus merganser	Mergus merganser	Mergus merganser	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps grisegena	Podiceps grisegena	Uria aalge	Uria aalge	Chlidonias niger	Chlidonias niger	Hydrocoloeus minutus	Hydrocoloeus minutus	Larus argentatus	Larus argentatus	Larus canus	Larus canus	Larus fuscus intermedius	Larus fuscus intermedius	Larus marinus	Larus marinus	Larus melanocephalus	Larus melanocephalus	Rissa tridactyla	Rissa tridactyla	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna paradisaea	Sterna paradisaea	Sterna sandvicensis	Sterna sandvicensis	Sternula albifrons	Sternula albifrons	Anas crecca	Anas crecca	Anas crecca	Arenaria interpres	Arenaria interpres	Calidris alba	Calidris alpina	Calidris alpina	Calidris canutus	Calidris maritima	Charadrius alexandrinus	Charadrius alexandrinus	Charadrius hiaticula	Charadrius hiaticula	Haematopus ostralegus	Haematopus ostralegus	Haematopus ostralegus	Limosa lapponica	Numenius arquata	Numenius arquata	Numenius arquata	Philomachus pugnax	Philomachus pugnax	Platalea leucorodia	Platalea leucorodia	Pluvialis apricaria	Pluvialis apricaria	Pluvialis squatarola	Recurvirostra avosetta	Recurvirostra avosetta	Tadorna tadorna	Tadorna tadorna	Tadorna tadorna	Tringa glareola	Tringa glareola	Tringa totanus	Tringa totanus	Vanellus vanellus	Vanellus vanellus
Element code	232037	232037	232037	159164	159164	159164	159172	159197	159197	159197	137071	137072	137073	137074	137074	137074	158939	158939	158939	158941	158941	159168	159168	159168	148791	148791	148791	159159	416682	416682	416682	159176	159176	159177	159177	159177	159088	159089	159090	159090	159090	232054	232054	232054	137128	137128	137130	137130	137186	137188	232039	159097	159097	159097	159098	159098	159098	137179	137179	137179	137182	137182	137183	137183	137133	137133	137137	137137	567449	567449	137138	137138	137141	137141	232050	232050	137146	137146	137147	137147	137156	137156	137162	137162	137165	137165	137166	137166	567480	567480	158943	158943	158943	147431	147431	159084	159047	159047	147433	159052	212611	212611	212619	212619	147436	147436	147436	159034	159037	159037	159037	159046	159046	416678	416678	159135	159135	159137	212721	212721	232042	232042	232042	A166	A166	158970	158970	159142	159142
Element code source	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Criterion	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4	D1C2	D1C4
Parameter	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)	Other	Distribution (range)
Parameter other	Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding birds)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (breeding pairs)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (wintering individuals)	Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding population)	Abundance (wintering individuals)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)		Abundance (breeding pairs)
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	280.0	17250.0		900.0	162000.0		15400.0	100.0	65000.0		2500.0	600.0	136000.0	23000.0	140000.0		25.0	4780.0		800.0			62000.0		20000.0	135000.0		6300.0	11000.0	61000.0		25.0		2000.0	16800.0		34.0	24300.0	3600.0	54400.0		6800.0	187000.0		1300.0		1530.0		180.0	6000.0	2080.0	66.0	13850.0		3100.0	9600.0		32548.0	24000.0		3500.0		1400.0		2900.0		53.0		2.0		65000.0		33000.0		5000.0		1800.0		17.0		340.0		425.0		4500.0		5800.0		410.0		50.0	14600.0		30.0		326.0	135.0		27000.0	280.0	56.0		1500.0		7000.0	43000.0		138.0	330.0	15300.0		43.0		101.0		3.0		200.0	2400.0		1500.0	32400.0		94.0		9000.0		20000.0
Value achieved lower	280.0	17250.0		900.0	162000.0		15400.0	100.0	65000.0		2500.0	600.0	136000.0	23000.0	140000.0		25.0	4780.0		800.0			62000.0		20000.0	135000.0		6300.0	11000.0	61000.0		25.0		2000.0	16800.0		34.0	24300.0	3600.0	54400.0		6800.0	187000.0		1300.0		1530.0		180.0	6000.0	2080.0	66.0			3100.0	9600.0		32548.0	24000.0		3500.0		1400.0		2900.0		53.0		2.0		65000.0		33000.0		5000.0		1800.0		17.0		340.0		425.0		4500.0		5800.0		410.0		50.0	14600.0		30.0		326.0	135.0		27000.0	280.0	56.0		1500.0		7000.0	43000.0		138.0	330.0	15300.0		43.0		101.0		3.0		200.0	2400.0		1500.0	32400.0		94.0		9000.0		20000.0
Value unit	Other	(number of) individuals		Other	(number of) individuals		(number of) individuals	Other	(number of) individuals		(number of) individuals	(number of) individuals	(number of) individuals	Other	(number of) individuals		Other	(number of) individuals		Other		Other	(number of) individuals		Other	(number of) individuals		(number of) individuals	Other	(number of) individuals		Other		Other	(number of) individuals		(number of) individuals	(number of) individuals	Other	(number of) individuals		Other	(number of) individuals		Other		Other		(number of) individuals	(number of) individuals	(number of) individuals	Other	(number of) individuals		Other	(number of) individuals		Other	(number of) individuals		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other		Other	(number of) individuals		Other		(number of) individuals	Other		(number of) individuals	(number of) individuals	Other		Other		Other	(number of) individuals		(number of) individuals	Other	(number of) individuals		Other		Other		Other		(number of) individuals	Other		Other	(number of) individuals		Other		Other		Other
Value unit other	Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs				Breeding pairs						Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs				Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs					Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs					Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding birds		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs				Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs				Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs			Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs		Breeding pairs
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Deteriorating	Improving	Deteriorating	Stable	Improving	Deteriorating	Improving	Improving	Stable	Improving	Unknown	Deteriorating	Improving	Stable	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Improving	Deteriorating	Stable	Deteriorating	Unknown	Improving	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Improving	Improving	Stable	Stable	Deteriorating	Improving	Unknown	Improving	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Improving	Deteriorating	Improving	Improving	Stable	Stable	Improving	Improving	Stable	Improving	Improving	Stable	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Improving	Stable	Stable	Stable	Improving	Improving	Stable	Stable	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Improving	Stable	Improving	Deteriorating	Improving	Improving	Stable	Improving	Improving	Improving	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Stable	Deteriorating	Stable	Improving	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Stable	Improving	Deteriorating	Stable	Deteriorating	Unknown	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Stable	Stable	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Stable	Improving	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Improving	Improving	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating	Stable	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Improving	Stable	Deteriorating	Stable	Deteriorating	Stable
Parameter achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description parameter	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (between 20% - 30% decrease).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 50% - 100% increase).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 30% - 50% increase).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 50% - 100% increase).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 50% - 100% increase).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be increasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a fluctuating trend in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (up to 50% decrease, meaning that the population has halved).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 30% - 50% increase).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (up to 50% decrease, meaning that the population has halved).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (increased with a factor between 10-100).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status. The population abundance is unknown in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (increased with a factor between 1-10).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (increased with a factor between 1-10).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (increased with a factor between 1-10).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (increased with a factor between 10-100). Den høj stigning skal ses i lyset af, at arten ynglede første gang i Danmark i 1992.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a fluctuating trend in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be increasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a fluctuating trend in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a fluctuating trend in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (between 20% - 30% decrease).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (up to 50% decrease, meaning that the population has halved).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 50% - 100% increase).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 50% - 100% increase).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be increasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (increased with a factor between 1-10).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 50% - 100% increase).		Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be increasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 50% - 100% increase).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (between 30% - 50% decrease).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 30% - 50% increase).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 50% - 100% increase).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be increasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (between 20% - 30% decrease).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated. Range is unknown in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 30% - 50% increase).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 30% - 50% increase).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 30% - 50% increase).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be increasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be increasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (increased with a factor between 1-10).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be increasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (between 20% - 30% decrease).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (between 30% - 50% decrease).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (up to 50% decrease, meaning that the population has halved).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 50% - 100% increase).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (increased with a factor between 1-10).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a fluctuating trend in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (between 20% - 30% decrease).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a fluctuating trend in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status. The population abundance is unknown in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (between 20% - 30% decrease).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a fluctuating trend in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (increased with a factor between 1-10).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (up to 50% decrease, meaning that the population has halved).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be decreasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (increased with a factor between 10-100). Arten har været fast ynglefugl i Danmark siden 1996. Inden dette tidspunkt har den kun ynglet meget uregelmæssigt i landet med enkelte yngleforekomster i 1900, 1919 og senest mere regelmæssigt mellem 1962 og 1969 i Vejlerne.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be increasing in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be fluctuating in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a fluctuating trend in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (up to 50% decrease, meaning that the population has halved).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (between 20 - 30% decrease).	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is stable in the assessment period.	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a positive trend in the assessment period (between 30% - 50% increase).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (between 20% - 30% decrease).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.	It has not been possible to estimate environmental status, however, the population abundance is showing a negative trend in the assessment period (between 30% - 50% decrease).	Status is not estimated, however, range is found to be stable in the assessment period.
Related indicator	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	1.2	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12	DK_BIRDDIRART12
Criteria status	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description criteria	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	Wintering population only.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	Wintering population only.	Wintering population only.	Wintering population only.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.			Breeding birds.	Wintering population only.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	Wintering population only.	Wintering population only.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding population.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Wintering population only.	Wintering population only.	Wintering population only.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Wintering population only.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Wintering population only.	Wintering population only.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	Wintering population only.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Wintering population only.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	The breeding pairs and the wintering individuals are reported as separate criteria values.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.	Breeding population only.	Breeding birds.
Element status	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description element																																																																					I Havstrategi II står den under det videnskabelige navn Larus minutus.	I Havstrategi II står den under det videnskabelige navn Larus minutus.
Integration rule type parameter	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.
Integration rule type criteria	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.	A method for integrating criteria has not yet been adopted, nor has it been considered possible to integrate the condition in relation to populations of breeding and wintering birds of the same species.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description overall status	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding birds seeking bottom food is considered to be in poor condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this bird group is assessed to be healthy for the breeding birds, but not for the wintering ones. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. In HELCOM, the bird group for breeding herbivorous birds is considered to be in good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay , waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat, and good condition in the Belt Sea, Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and not in good condition in the Belt Sea and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is not good condition in the Kattegat and Belt Sea, and good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is considered to be healthy for the overwintering birds and for the breeding birds. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. not in good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.	Condition assessments of seabirds have been made in both HELCOM and OSPAR. With a view to creating consistency between reporting under the Marine Strategy Directive and the Bird Protection Directive and in line with the GES decision, Denmark has chosen to report the trends for birds that were reported in accordance with national guidelines under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive in 2013 in this report. In addition, the results for birds prepared by HELCOM and OSPAR in connection with HELCOM's HOLAS II and OSPAR's IA 2017 are reflected. and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and the Arkona Basin. For wintering birds, the assessment is good condition in Kattegat and Kiel Bay, Mecklenburg Bay, waters around Bornholm and Arkona Basinnet, and not good condition in the Belt Sea. In OSPAR, this group of birds is assessed to be healthy for the overwintering birds, but not for the young. The regional assessments of the status of seabirds are based on species-specific data for the mentioned regions and thus do not only contain data for Danish birds.
Assessments period	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011	1999-2011
Related pressures	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
Related targets	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5	DK-T1.1 DK-T1.2 DK-T1.3 DK-T1.4 DK-T1.5