Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D10 / Spain / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D10 Litter
Member State Spain
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
Reported by Subdirección General para la protección del mar. D.G. Sostenibilidad de la Costa y del Mar. Minister
Report date 2020-02-03
Report access msfd2018-ART8GES_MOD2020.xml

Demarcación marina noratlántica (ABI-ES-SD-NOR)

GES component
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
Feature
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Element
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Undefined
Undefined
Element code
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
UNDEF
UNDEF
Element code source
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Derived from animals (marine mammals)
Invertebrates (mussels)
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element source
National
National
National
National
National
Criterion
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C2
D10C2
D10C2
D10C3
D10C3
Parameter
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on water surface
Amount on coastline
Amount on water surface
Other
Other
Other
Parameter other
Microplastics in sediments
microplatetics
microplastic concentration
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
781.0
2.9
2.0
43.9
Value achieved lower
45.0
0.6
0.8
Value unit
Other
Other
number of items per square kilometre
number of items per kilogram of dry weight
Other
number of items per kilogram
Value unit other
Average number of objects per beach
Density by weight (kg/km²)
Average concentration (mps/m²)
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Stable
Improving
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
The beaches in the monitoring programme BM-1 in this catchment area are: Agiti (Guipúzcoa), Meñacacoz (Bizcea), Oyambre (Cantabria), Vega (Asturias), Covas (Lugo), Baldaio and O Rostro (A Coruña), A Lanzada and Rhodes (Pontevedra). A total of 205 sampling campaigns have been carried out. Abundance: In the 205 campaigns, a total count of 81.187 objects was recorded, with an average object abundance per beach and campaign of 396. Classification by category: Plastic items are the most common (78.1 %) and, to a lesser extent, paper/cardboard (6.2 %), health/hygiene and wood (2.6 %). The proportion obtained from paper/board is due to the abundance of cigarette filters that are to be classified in this category. Most commonly found objects: The most common objects were non-identifiable plastic items ranging from 0 to 2.5 cm in size and those of a larger size, between 2,5 and 50 cm (IDs 117 and 46), reaching the sum of both, amounting to 34.4 % of the total. The cabates, twine or twine with a diameter of less than 1 cm (ID 32) constitute 12.3 %, followed by lids and plastic caps (ID 15), cigarette buds (ID 64) and cotton buds (ID 98) that represent 7.4 %, 5.2 % and 5.0 %. Origin of marine litter: Marine litter of unknown origin or corresponding to more than one source is 54 %. 19 % are tourism (19 %) and shipping or shipping activities (17 %), much lower the impact of waste from health facilities (6 %) or waste from fishing activities (4 %). Trend in the abundance of the main marine litter categories: Plastics are likely to be growing. Trend of abundance of most common objects: The non-identifiable plastic fragments between 0 and 2.5 cm show a clear increasing trend. Also, synthetic foams show a probably growing trend. The abundance of plastic beverage bottles and bottles show a likely decreasing trend. The lids, caps and corchos of plastic, as well as plastic cords or cords with a diameter of more than 1 cm show a stable trend. The remaining objects of top X do not show a clear trend. The total abundance of marine litter on beaches does not show a clear trend, which can be considered not to be on the increase and is similar to a stable outcome.
Litter on the seabed was collected through bottom hauls during six oceanographic demersal seasons (ICES IBTSSWG) which were carried out by all autumn seasons between 2007 and 2012 on the north coast of Spain. Broken tow has been carried out on the slope and on the continental shelf. The distribution of deep-sea litter on the continental shelf of the North Atlantic Ocean on the Iberian Peninsula showed a high variability in the period between 2007 and 2012. In this period, the weight density for marine litter has decreased significantly, with the year that the density was found to be higher on 2007 (2.9 kg/km²) and the lower of 2011 (0.6 kg/km²). In the area under review, the areas with the highest concentrations were the Baixas Rías Baixas (38,4 items/km²) and the Cantabrian Sea (38,8 items/km²), although these differences were not statistically significant. The type of the most abundant marine litter and the fund were plastic (71.8 %), and as in the case of total refuse, it has tended to decline over the period of study. In contrast, the abundance of fisheries articles does not seem to decrease, accounting for 27 % of all litter collected.
(...) In this context, the free float has been monitored on the northern North Atlantic platform of the North Atlantic demarcation between 2007 and 2017, as part of the objectives of the annual collection of Peacus’s annualcollection by the IEO during the spring transition to winter (April). These campaigns, co-financed by the EU data collection framework, are used to provide an index of abundance of small pelagic species that are independent of the fishery using acoustic methods. In addition, environmental information and data on the abundance and distribution of the main predators are obtained. The observers who collect information on top predators also record data on floating floating floating (position, abundance, composition, etc.) that they find. The average number of floating litter collected, integrated in space and time off, was 0,71 ± 0,04 items km-2. The densities in the rías and the Western Cantabrian Sea were relatively low, with values lower than 0,8 in km-2. These figures contrast with the average density of the floating litre one litre floating in the Western Cantabrian Sea, which reached 2.0 t-km-2. These two situations include intermediate values (around 1.3 m-2 elements) of floating litter in the Rías Baixas and the Central Cantabrian Sea. Analysis of the floating litter composition showed that most of the items were made of plastic (40.8 %), the second largest material being wood, which accounted for approximately 2 % of floating waste.
A laboratory quantification of the number of microplastic particles contained in the most surface sandal of the beaches where it is collected on the line of the last fishing trip 5 within a frame of 0,5 x 0.5 m. its concentration expressed as a number of particles per kg of sand and particles per m² is calculated. Three beaches have been sampled. The average concentration obtained for the beaches of this Demarcación marina has been 14,8 particles/kg of sand, which is equivalent to 141,4 particles/m². The beach with the highest average concentration in the period 2016-2018 was Rhodes (23,4 particles/kg) and the lowest was that of Oyambre (7,4 particles/kg). Almost all of the microplastic particles accounted for in the north Atlantic district were smaller than 1 mm, the most frequent being smaller than 200 µm. Most of the particles accounted for are taken into account with fragments (61.2 %) or fibres or filaments (25.4 %), the rest being very low particles. Pre-production pellets are rather infrequent on the sampled beaches and account for 5.6 % of the total
MPs) and 208 macro particulates (> 5 mm
An analysis of microplastics in sediments from this demarcation has been carried out as an impact on the BABSEMAN projects. During the SICON-16 campaign, sediments were collected along the whole coastline of this area, which is still being analysed. These data will be the baseline in terms of microplastic pollution as there are no other values for this variable. The sediments of the Vigo estuary and an adjacent platform have been treated in detail as part of a doctoral thesis. A research article has been concluded as a result of this work. Microplastics were first determined in sediments in the Ría de Vigo. The area of study, Ría de Vigo, is known for its fishing activity and shellfish harvesting. The sediment samples were collected by means of a dredging box and the selected stations were exposed to different anthropogenic activities or pressures (fishing port, industrial port, UWWTP,...). The methodology is based on a density separation followed by examination under the stereo-microscope to identify the shape, colour and size of plastics. The results showed a spatial gradient along the estuary. The average concentration of PM microplastics was 101,7 ± 128,1 particulate/kg sediment (DW). The principal parliamentarians types of microplastics were fibres (75 %) and fragments (11 %). The predominant colours were transparent (63 %), blue (21 %) and toasted (6 %) and the average size was 1,24 ± 2.24 mm. It was found that there was no correlation between the TOC% and the concentration of PMSs in this area.
Microplastics were identified in all analysed samples, an average of 12 elements per stomach, although the abundance varied widely from one stomach to another.
The microplastic concentration observed in each mussel ranged from 0 to 12,69 microplastics/g PF, averaging 2,87 ± 2,81 microplastics/g PF
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The total abundance of all plastics is likely to increase and within them the fragments of plastics measuring less than 2.5 cm (in larger size) show a growing trend in the time series considered. In contrast, the abundance of plastic bottles shows a likely downward trend, which could be associated with greater public awareness of this particular article. The other monitoring programmes for marine litter require further consolidation and collection of larger datasets for trend analysis. However, the available data provide information on the abundance, composition and spatial distribution.
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The total abundance of all plastics is likely to increase and within them the fragments of plastics measuring less than 2.5 cm (in larger size) show a growing trend in the time series considered. In contrast, the abundance of plastic bottles shows a likely downward trend, which could be associated with greater public awareness of this particular article. The other monitoring programmes for marine litter require further consolidation and collection of larger datasets for trend analysis. However, the available data provide information on the abundance, composition and spatial distribution.
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The total abundance of all plastics is likely to increase and within them the fragments of plastics measuring less than 2.5 cm (in larger size) show a growing trend in the time series considered. In contrast, the abundance of plastic bottles shows a likely downward trend, which could be associated with greater public awareness of this particular article. The other monitoring programmes for marine litter require further consolidation and collection of larger datasets for trend analysis. However, the available data provide information on the abundance, composition and spatial distribution.
Insufficient data to evaluate the BEA. In the absence of defined threshold values such an assessment can only be carried out by analysing the trend and it is estimated that data for at least 6 consecutive years would be required for this trend.
Insufficient data to evaluate the BEA. In the absence of defined threshold values such an assessment can only be carried out by analysing the trend and it is estimated that data for at least 6 consecutive years would be required for this trend.
Insufficient data to evaluate the BEA. In the absence of defined threshold values such an assessment can only be carried out by analysing the trend and it is estimated that data for at least 6 consecutive years would be required for this trend.
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion.
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion.
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion.
Derived from animals (marine mammals): Plastic waste is currently recognised as one of the major global threats to marine life. However, there are few data on the presence and abundance of microplastics (plastics < 5 mm in size) in marine mammals. This is the first record of the presence of microplastics in the Iberian peninsula’s digestive tracts of marine mammals. This study used 35 samples of stomach contents of common dolphin. Microplastics were identified in all analysed samples, an average of 12 elements per stomach, although the abundance varied widely from one stomach to another. Most of the plastic items were small fibres, although some pieces of plastic items were also found and an account was also found. Excluding smaller fibres as potential air pollution, the estimated emergence of microplastics could fall to 94 %. Although the factors affecting the accumulation of microplastics and their effect on common dolphins are unknown, the fact that all the stomachs analysed contain microplastics raises concerns.
While the minor was observed in Avilés, an average of 0,60 ± 1,05 microplastics/g PF. The average concentration of microplastics observed in Santander and Canido was significantly higher (p < 0,05) to that observed in San Adrián, Redondela and in Avilés. The concentration of microplastics observed in San Adrián was significantly lower than that observed in Canido, Home, Bilbao and Santander.
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The total abundance of all plastics is likely to increase and within them the fragments of plastics measuring less than 2.5 cm (in larger size) show a growing trend in the time series considered. In contrast, the abundance of plastic bottles shows a likely downward trend, which could be associated with greater public awareness of this particular article. The other monitoring programmes for marine litter require further consolidation and collection of larger datasets for trend analysis. However, the available data provide information on the abundance, composition and spatial distribution.
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The total abundance of all plastics is likely to increase and within them the fragments of plastics measuring less than 2.5 cm (in larger size) show a growing trend in the time series considered. In contrast, the abundance of plastic bottles shows a likely downward trend, which could be associated with greater public awareness of this particular article. The other monitoring programmes for marine litter require further consolidation and collection of larger datasets for trend analysis. However, the available data provide information on the abundance, composition and spatial distribution.
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The total abundance of all plastics is likely to increase and within them the fragments of plastics measuring less than 2.5 cm (in larger size) show a growing trend in the time series considered. In contrast, the abundance of plastic bottles shows a likely downward trend, which could be associated with greater public awareness of this particular article. The other monitoring programmes for marine litter require further consolidation and collection of larger datasets for trend analysis. However, the available data provide information on the abundance, composition and spatial distribution.
No existe definición de Buen Estado Ambiental a nivel regional/subregional. el conocimiento científico actual no es suficiente para poder definir valores o concentraciones umbrales por encima de las cuales pueda sospecharse la existencia de efectos adversos para el medio marino por microplásticos
No existe definición de Buen Estado Ambiental a nivel regional/subregional. el conocimiento científico actual no es suficiente para poder definir valores o concentraciones umbrales por encima de las cuales pueda sospecharse la existencia de efectos adversos para el medio marino por microplásticos
No existe definición de Buen Estado Ambiental a nivel regional/subregional. el conocimiento científico actual no es suficiente para poder definir valores o concentraciones umbrales por encima de las cuales pueda sospecharse la existencia de efectos adversos para el medio marino por microplásticos
Results from studies on the intake of microplastics in common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) in 2005-2010 and mussels (Mytilus sp.) have not been integrated in 2016.
Results from studies on the intake of microplastics in common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) in 2005-2010 and mussels (Mytilus sp.) have not been integrated in 2016.
Assessments period
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2016-2018
2016-2018
2016-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
Related pressures
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
Related targets
  • AN10
  • BN1
  • BN10
  • BN11
  • BN14
  • BN15
  • BN16
  • BN4
  • BN7
  • BN8
  • BN9
  • CN15
  • CN16
  • CN18
  • CN6
  • CN7
  • CN8
  • AN10
  • BN1
  • BN10
  • BN11
  • BN14
  • BN15
  • BN16
  • BN4
  • BN7
  • BN8
  • BN9
  • CN15
  • CN16
  • CN18
  • CN6
  • CN7
  • CN8
  • AN10
  • BN1
  • BN10
  • BN11
  • BN14
  • BN15
  • BN16
  • BN4
  • BN7
  • BN8
  • BN9
  • CN15
  • CN16
  • CN18
  • CN6
  • CN7
  • CN8
  • AN10
  • BN1
  • BN10
  • BN11
  • BN14
  • BN15
  • BN16
  • BN4
  • BN7
  • BN8
  • BN9
  • CN15
  • CN16
  • CN18
  • CN6
  • CN7
  • CN8
  • AN10
  • BN1
  • BN10
  • BN11
  • BN14
  • BN15
  • BN16
  • BN4
  • BN7
  • BN8
  • BN9
  • CN15
  • CN16
  • CN18
  • CN6
  • CN7
  • CN8
  • AN10
  • BN1
  • BN10
  • BN11
  • BN14
  • BN15
  • BN16
  • BN4
  • BN7
  • BN8
  • BN9
  • CN15
  • CN16
  • CN18
  • CN6
  • CN7
  • CN8
  • AN10
  • BN1
  • BN10
  • BN11
  • BN14
  • BN15
  • BN16
  • BN4
  • BN7
  • BN8
  • BN9
  • CN15
  • CN16
  • CN18
  • CN6
  • CN7
  • CN8
  • AN10
  • BN1
  • BN10
  • BN11
  • BN14
  • BN15
  • BN16
  • BN4
  • BN7
  • BN8
  • BN9
  • CN15
  • CN16
  • CN18
  • CN6
  • CN7
  • CN8

Demarcación marina sudatlántica (ABI-ES-SD-SUD)

GES component
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
Feature
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Element
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Element code
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
Element code source
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element source
National
National
National
Criterion
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C2
D10C2
Parameter
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on water surface
Amount on coastline
Amount on water surface
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
283.0
0.07
17.3
Value achieved lower
54.0
1.07
Value unit
Other
number of items per square kilometre
number of items per kilogram of dry weight
Other
Value unit other
Average number of objects per beach
Average concentration (mps/m²)
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
Cups, cups, cups of plastic
This monitoring programme has not yet delivered results.
Based on the work carried out in the CLANATLANTIC project, statistics were drawn up for the collection of information for bird-watchers and marine mammals of floating waste. In 2018 the first sampling was carried out using this methodology in the Gulf of Cádiz in collaboration with observers from the University of Cádiz.
A laboratory quantification of the number of microplastic particles contained in the most surface sandal of the beaches where it is collected on the line of the last fishing trip 5 within a frame of 0,5 x 0.5 m. its concentration expressed as a number of particles per kg of sand and particles per m² is calculated. 1 beach has been sampled in this demarcated area. the average concentration achieved in the period 2016-2 018 has been 9,7 particles/kg of sand, equivalent to 121,8 particles/m². A significant variability has been detected in the microplastic concentrations detected in the different seasons. Most of the particles accounted for are particles (46.2 %), expanded polystyrene particles (33.3 %) or fibres or filaments (14.0 %). Pre-production pellets are rather infrequent on sampled beaches and they account for 6.4 % of the total. The other forms referred to in the quantification protocol have not come to light within this Marine Demarcation Service.
The IEO started pilot sampling of microplastics in the surface column of water in the South Asian FD in 2016. Samples of surface water were collected using a cover trawl with a 333 μm grid during August 2016, 2017 and 2018. This sampling is part of the Gulf of Cádiz pelagic resource assessment campaigns (ECOCADIZ). It has not produced any results in due time. Work is currently under way on the 2016 samples at its TFA for the university in Vigo.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached.
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached.
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached.
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Description element
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion. Non-identifiable plastic fragments between 2.5 cm and 50 cm in size (larger than size)
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion. Non-identifiable plastic fragments between 2.5 cm and 50 cm in size (larger than size)
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion. Non-identifiable plastic fragments between 2.5 cm and 50 cm in size (larger than size)
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. Non-identifiable plastic fragments between 2.5 cm and 50 cm in size (larger than size)
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. Non-identifiable plastic fragments between 2.5 cm and 50 cm in size (larger than size)
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. Non-identifiable plastic fragments between 2.5 cm and 50 cm in size (larger than size)
No existe definición de Buen Estado Ambiental a nivel regional/subregional. el conocimiento científico actual no es suficiente para poder definir valores o concentraciones umbrales por encima de las cuales pueda sospecharse la existencia de efectos adversos para el medio marino por microplásticos
No existe definición de Buen Estado Ambiental a nivel regional/subregional. el conocimiento científico actual no es suficiente para poder definir valores o concentraciones umbrales por encima de las cuales pueda sospecharse la existencia de efectos adversos para el medio marino por microplásticos
Assessments period
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2016-2018
2016-2018
Related pressures
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
Related targets
  • AS10
  • BS1
  • BS10
  • BS11
  • BS14
  • BS15
  • BS16
  • BS3
  • BS4
  • BS5
  • BS7
  • BS9
  • CS15
  • CS16
  • CS18
  • CS6
  • CS7
  • CS8
  • AS10
  • BS1
  • BS10
  • BS11
  • BS14
  • BS15
  • BS16
  • BS3
  • BS4
  • BS5
  • BS7
  • BS9
  • CS15
  • CS16
  • CS18
  • CS6
  • CS7
  • CS8
  • AS10
  • BS1
  • BS10
  • BS11
  • BS14
  • BS15
  • BS16
  • BS3
  • BS4
  • BS5
  • BS7
  • BS9
  • CS15
  • CS16
  • CS18
  • CS6
  • CS7
  • CS8
  • AS10
  • BS1
  • BS10
  • BS11
  • BS14
  • BS15
  • BS16
  • BS3
  • BS4
  • BS5
  • BS7
  • BS9
  • CS15
  • CS16
  • CS18
  • CS6
  • CS7
  • CS8
  • AS10
  • BS1
  • BS10
  • BS11
  • BS14
  • BS15
  • BS16
  • BS3
  • BS4
  • BS5
  • BS7
  • BS9
  • CS15
  • CS16
  • CS18
  • CS6
  • CS7
  • CS8