MS/Art8/2018/D2/Spain/NE Atlantic: Macaronesia — Marine Information System for Europe

Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D2 / Spain / NE Atlantic: Macaronesia

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due	2018-10-15
GES Descriptor	D2 Non-indigenous species
Member State	Spain
Region/subregion	NE Atlantic: Macaronesia
Reported by	Subdirección General para la protección del mar. D.G. Sostenibilidad de la Costa y del Mar. Minister
Report date	2020-02-03
Report access	msfd2018-ART8GES_MOD2020.xml

Demarcación marina canaria (AMA-ES-SD-CAN)

Simplified table

GES component	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2
Feature	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Established non-indigenous species
Element	Aetea anguina	Aetea ligulata	Aetea longicollis	Aetea sica	Aetea truncata	Antithamnion diminuatum	Argyrosomus regius	Asparagopsis armata	Asparagopsis taxiformis	Beania mirabilis	Bonnemaisonia hamifera	Botrylloides leachii	Botrylloides violaceus	Botryllus schlosseri	Bugula neritina	Bugulina avicularia	Bugulina fulva	Bugulina simplex	Bugulina stolonifera	Caprella scaura	Caulerpa cylindracea	Caulerpa racemosa	Cephalopholis nigri	Ceramium atrorubescens	Ceramium cingulatum	Chorizopora brongniartii	Codium fragile	Colpomenia sinuosa	Corynophlaea cystophorae	Crambe crambe	Dicentrarchus labrax	Diplosoma listerianum	Dipteroshiphonia dendritica	Electra pilosa	Escharina vulgaris	Fenestrulina malusii	Gracilaria vermiculophylla	Grateloupia doryphora	Grateloupia imbricata	Grateloupia turuturu	Gymnophycus hapsiphorus	Haminoea callidegenita	Jellyella tuberculata	Laurencia caduciramulosa	Membranipora tuberculata	Microcosmus squamiger	Microporella ciliata	Monodactylus sebae	Neosiphonia harveyi	Pomacanthus maculosus	Predaea huismanii	Prognathodes marcellae	Puellina innominata	Reptadeonella violacea	Schizoporella errata	Schizoporella unicornis	Scinaia acuta	Scruparia ambigua	Scytosiphon dotyi	Sphaerospora testicularis	Styela plicata	Stypopodium schimperi	Terebra corrugata	Undaria pinnatifida	Womersleyella setacea	Not applicable
Element code	111062	111064	111065	111066	111067	144512	127007	144438	144439	111072	144442	250081	148715	103862	111158	833990	834010	834016	834018	236551	660621	144472	279151	371747	144539	111304	145086	145857	144948	133445	126975	103579	144809	111355	111520	111418	236157	145247	372191	295880	144591	181196	396730	375452	183266	236666	111421	278304	233888	220005	145645	126838	111330	111061	111527	111538	495386	111539	145868	120481	103936	145391	225102	145721	146371	Not applicable
Element code source	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	Other
Criterion																																																																			D2C1	D2C2
Parameter																																																																			Presence	Abundance
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend																																																																			Stable	Unknown
Parameter achieved																																																																			Yes	Not assessed
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status																																																																			Good	Not assessed
Description criteria																																																																			An increase in the number of invasive species in the demarcation line is not detected. The list of new IAS that have emerged since the reference period. In this demarcation the algae represent the most important group of non-native species. Good environmental status in the area as a whole does not appear to be at risk because of the presence of these species.	Not assessed. The scale used for the assessment of this criterion in the future marine strategy cycles shall be the same as used for the assessment of groups of species/large habitat types under Descriptors 1 and 6 than it will contribute to the evaluation of criterion D2C3 (adverse effects of non-native species). The criterion D2C2 is expressed per species assessed.
Element status	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	GES achieved	GES achieved	Unknown
Description overall status	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.	Non-indigenous species in the marine environment have a direct impact on the biodiversity of ecosystems and habitats, on the marine soil both sediment and rock. the communities in the coastal area as in the mid-water zone. The results obtained with indicator 2.1.1 in correspondence with criterion D2C1 are not conclusive, however it seems to indicate that a reduction of the species initially considered improves the diagnosis of the evaluation. The database needs to be further developed using all bibliographical references, and increasing knowledge of the evolution of the registers of non-native registers, as well as agreeing methodologies for the assessment of BEA at regional/(sub) regional level.	Non-indigenous species in the marine environment have a direct impact on the biodiversity of ecosystems and habitats, on the marine soil both sediment and rock. the communities in the coastal area as in the mid-water zone. The results obtained with indicator 2.1.1 in correspondence with criterion D2C1 are not conclusive, however it seems to indicate that a reduction of the species initially considered improves the diagnosis of the evaluation. The database needs to be further developed using all bibliographical references, and increasing knowledge of the evolution of the registers of non-native registers, as well as agreeing methodologies for the assessment of BEA at regional/(sub) regional level.	In 2012, in summary it was concluded that neither the good environmental status in the whole of the demarcation, or the continued existence of the different habitat types that it includes, appeared to be be seriously threatened by the presence of non-native species. The implementation of established non-native monitoring systems and impact studies are: recommended to make an informed assessment of potential risks. In 2018 we have no evidence as to the impact, distribution and spread of some species. non-indigenous, or risk analysis of the effects of IS. However, there are already defined and developing sampling programmes to assess these impacts for species individuals. It is expected that the implementation of the programmes of monitoring, and the development of evaluation methodologies will enable us to establish new ones. targets for the BEA.
Assessments period	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018	2018
Related pressures
Related targets	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9	A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9			A.C.13 A.C.9 B.C.13 B.C.14 C.C.11 C.C.12 C.C.13 C.C.19 C.C.2 C.C.21 C.C.22 C.C.9