Member State report / Art10 / 2018 / D4 / Spain / NE Atlantic: Macaronesia
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Macaronesia |
| Reported by | Subdirección General para la Protección del Mar. D.G. Sostenibilidad de la Costa y del Mar. Minister |
| Report date | 2020-02-03 |
| Report access | msfd2018-ART10.XML |
Target code |
00 |
A. C.13 |
A. C.14 |
A.1.10 |
A.1.12 |
A.1.2 |
A.1.3 |
A.1.4 |
A.1.4 |
A.1.4 |
A.1.5 |
A.1.6 |
A.1.7 |
A.1.8 |
A.1.9 |
A.3.1 |
A.C.10 |
A.C.3. |
A.C.5 |
A.C.6 |
A.C.7 |
A.C.8 |
A.C.9 |
B.C.13 |
B.C.14 |
C.1.1 |
C.1.2 |
C.1.3 |
C.1.4 |
C.1.6 |
C.2.1 |
C.2.2 |
C.2.3 |
C.3.1 |
C.3.4 |
C.3.7 |
C.3.8 |
C.C.11 |
C.C.12 |
C.C.13 |
C.C.14 |
C.C.15 |
C.C.16 |
C.C.17 |
C.C.19 |
C.C.2 |
C.C.20 |
C.C.21 |
C.C.22 |
C.C.8 |
C.C.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target description |
Achieve or maintain the values and characteristics defined as GES for all descriptors of the good environmental status in the Canary Islands
|
Ensuring regulatory compliance.
* Surveying of surveillance in hours
* Infringements identified vs sanctions imposed
* Human resources available for surveillance and available materials.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.12
|
Increase awareness of food webs, with a view to developing new indicators to assess and define Good Environmental Status.
⢠Existence of appropriate indicators to assess food webs.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.8
|
Establish a national system for the coordination of programmes for the monitoring of incidental catches of seabirds, reptiles and marine mammals, reptiles and mammals and cabbage birds.
In the second cycle, this objective has been divided into two:
A.C.7. Improve national coordination and standardisation of
habitat and species monitoring programmes
A.C.8. Improve the coordination of monitoring and response to events
of incidental catches and beamings, including the monitoring of the
incidental catch of turtles, mammals and seabirds in ships
fishing
Both will be reported as new because they have changed code and indicators
|
Ensuring proper surveillance of the marine environment through remote or on-site systems
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.C.13. Ensuring regulatory compliance
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-indigenous species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation (avoid leakages in aquaculture or aquarium installations, avoid transport and release into the medium of species associated with those cultivated outside their natural range, ballast water control, control of live bait, sediment discharge control, anchoring or cleaning of helmets).
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.2.Minimise introduction or expansion possibilities
secondary tract of non-native species, directly taking into account tracks and
anthropogenic vector translocation vectors
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Eradicate or decrease, preferably in the initial stages of the invasive processes, the abundance of invasive species to ease pressure on the habitat, in cases where the economic or biodiversity loss is significant, and provided that it is technically feasible and there is no collateral damage
|
Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease of the populations of non-commercial species groups at the top of the trophic chain (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, pelagic and demersal species), such as accidental catches, collisions with boats, ingestion of marine litter, land predators, pollution, destruction of habitats and overfishing.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.10. Reduce the main anthropogenic causes of mortality of
elasmobranchs, in particular those deriving from the
commercial exploitation and by-catch
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease of the populations of non-commercial species groups at the top of the trophic chain (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, pelagic and demersal species), such as accidental catches, collisions with boats, ingestion of marine litter, land predators, pollution, destruction of habitats and overfishing.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.10. Reduce the main anthropogenic causes of mortality of
elasmobranchs, in particular those deriving from the
commercial exploitation and by-catch
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease of the populations of non-commercial species groups at the top of the trophic chain (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, pelagic and demersal species), such as accidental catches, collisions with boats, ingestion of marine litter, land predators, pollution, destruction of habitats and overfishing.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.10. Reduce the main anthropogenic causes of mortality of
elasmobranchs, in particular those deriving from the
commercial exploitation and by-catch
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To prevent impacts on trophic webs of the cultivation of marine species, with a focus on the cultivation of non-native and rare species
In the second cycle, the objective has been maintained, although changing the code and indicators
C.C.9. Preventing the impacts on food webs of culture from
marine species, with particular attention to species cultivation
they are both native and rare.
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, given that the code and the code have been changed.
|
Establecer programas de control de aquellas especies o grupos funcionales cuya proliferación indique una clara alteración y/o amenaza de las redes tróficas locales (p.e. Diadema aff. antillarum, especies liberadas de instalaciones de cultivos marinos, etc.).
En el segundo ciclo, este objetivo ha sido unido al A.1.7. para formar el siguiente :
A.C.10.Reducir o evitar el incremento de las poblaciones de especies o
grupos funcionales cuya proliferación indique una clara alteración y/o
amenaza de las redes tróficas locales (p.e. Diadema aff. antillarum,
especies liberadas de instalaciones de cultivos marinos, etc.)
Este objetivo se reportará como nuevo
|
To reduce or prevent the increase in the number of hedgebots, based on previously updated knowledge of the distribution and spread of their population, favouring the regeneration of the trophic chains of infralittoral rock habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been joined to A.1.6. to form the following:
A.C.10.Reducing or preventing the increase in species populations, or
functional groups whose proliferation indicates a clear alteration or
threat of local food webs (e.g. Diadea aff antillarum
|
Favouring regeneration of plant cover (algae and marine phanerogams), minimising the effect of the pressures to which they are subject.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended together with A.1.1 to:
C.C.1.Reduce pressure intensity and area
significant anthropogenic habitats on benthic habitats, with special reference to:
attention to protected habitats or natural interest.
This objective will be gained as a new objective.
|
Develop regulation to prevent commercial exploitation and by-catches of elasmobranchs included in the annexes of national legislation, European Directives or applicable international conventions.
|
Maintain viable populations of key species and apical predators (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds and fish) and for commercially exploited species, keep them within safe biological limits.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.C.3. To maintain or restore the natural balance of the stocks of
key species for the ecosystem.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To reduce or prevent the increase of populations of species or functional groups whose proliferation indicates a clear alteration or threat of local food webs (e.g. Diadea aff antillarum, species released from marine crops, etc.)
⢠Implementation of control programmes for these species
⢠Allocation and extension of the fine rchine diadema and apf. antillarum
⢠Number of initiatives or actions to reduce or prevent the increase in the number of hedgehog populations
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.6 AND A.1.7
|
Maintain or restore the natural balance of populations of key species for the ecosystem
* Trends in populations of the species used as evaluation elements, corresponding to various trophic levels.
* Indicators used for the assessment of food webs.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.3.4
|
Promoting the consideration of marine species in the regional, national and international asset lists of threatened species, as well as their study
* No. of marine species which are listed/delisted on lists and catalogues of threatened species, or change category.
* No. of target species.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.1
|
Improve international coordination of species monitoring programmes, especially for geographically wide species (e.g. fish, cetaceans and reptiles).
⢠Number of international initiatives and working groups involved.
⢠Establishment of an international group in Macaronesia for coordinating monitoring programmes for marine birds, marine mammals and sea turtles.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C1.2
|
Improve national coordination and standardisation of habitat and species monitoring programmes
⢠Development of methodologies/common protocols/guidelines.
⢠No of meetings for updating the monitoring programmes.
⢠Development of common access database for the different operators of monitoring programmes.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.7
|
Improve the coordination of monitoring and response to accidental catches and bereavement events, including the monitoring of the incidental catch of turtles, mammals and seabirds on fishing vessels.
⢠Adoption and implementation of coordination systems at national level (protocols, common data collection templates, common methodologies, common database) to address monitoring and response to these events.
⢠Percentage of fleet involved in tracking accidental turtles (logbooks, specific actions...)
OBJECTIVE 2012: A1.7
|
Manage processes for invasions of alien species in an integrated manner, including the development of early warning networks and their coordination at national level.
* The area covered by networks of detection and quantification of non-native species.
* Existence of action protocols for IAS screening events.
* Number of marine species categorised on the list of invasive alien species
* Percentage/number of invasive species subject to management measures or actions
* Percentage/number of habitats affected by invasive species which have been subject to management measures or actions
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.3, C.3.6
|
Encourage scientific studies, initiatives and projects on the impacts of the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment, in response to knowledge gaps identified in the Initial Assessment and in the successive phases of Marine Strategies.
* Awareness building on impacts arising from the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment, which are addressed by scientific studies and projects.
OBJECTIVES 2012: B.3.1, B.3.2, B.3.3, B.3.4
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through studies, initiatives and scientific projects on the impacts of the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment.
* Criteria for evaluating and monitoring the results of scientific projects/studies.
* Objectives and management measures for which the design has taken into account the results of scientific projects/studies.
|
Keep the lists of endangered species up to date and the assessment of their populations.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.C.5. Promote the consideration of marine species in the regional, national and international asset lists of threatened species, as well as their study.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Promote international cooperation in the study and monitoring of populations of geographically wide groups (e.g. cetaceans and reptiles).
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.C.6. Improve international coordination of species monitoring programmes, especially for geographically wide species.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensure social participation in the marine strategy of the Canary Islands area by means of dissemination, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and involvement of stakeholders in the marine environment.
In the second cycle, this objective has remained the same, with the exception of the code:
C.C.11. Ensure social participation in the marine strategy of the Canary Islands area by means of dissemination, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and involvement of stakeholders in the marine environment.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensure proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the Canary Islands, which carry out work relating to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and to exploit synergies.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.12. Ensure proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the Canary Islands, which carry out work relating to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and to exploit synergies.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensure that fish stocks are properly managed so that they remain within safe biological limits.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.14. To encourage fish stocks to be properly managed so that they remain within safe biological limits, paying particular attention to those whose status is unknown and to those who do not reach BEA according to the initial assessment of D3 in the sea demarcation of the Canary Islandsâ.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensure that the area affected by permanent physical alterations caused by human activities is a small proportion of the total area of the Canary Islands area.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.15. To promote that human actions do not significantly increase the surface area affected by physical loss of natural marine resources compared to the previous cycle in the Canary Islands area.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To ensure that biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of biogenic habitats and/or protected habitats and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of GES for these habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.16. To promote that the biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of protected habitats or natural interests and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of GES for these habitats.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Take mitigation measures in coastal stretches where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so that hydrodynamics and hydrodynamics properties are compatible with the conservation of habitats.
In the second cycle, the wording and the code have been slightly modified.
C.C.17. Take measures on coastal stretches where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so as to be compatible with the good environmental status of the seabed and hydrographical conditions.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicator has changed.
|
Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.19. Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information for both administrations and institutions related to the sea, and for the general public.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Increase the quality of information obtained from professional fishing and shellfish trade (volume of fishing, fishing effort or shellfish fishing, harvested species, fishing or shellfishing areas, etc.) so that the state and evolution of those working groups of commercial interest can be properly assessed.
|
Have information to assess the current status with regard to BEB on the basis of a larger number of commercially important stocks, within which the following specific objectives are identified:
⢠Monitoring and obtaining basic information for species that have not been included in the monitoring programmes so far and have been included in the list of species selected for Descriptor 3.
⢠Improve awareness of the status of selected stocks that currently do not have evaluations leading to major or secondary indicators (as defined in Commission Decision 2010/477/EU).
⢠Avant on the determination of precautionary and management reference values.
|
Increase awareness of trophic webs of both the coastal strip and deep-water ecosystems, including the study of key organisms as well as the effect of seasonal variations, with a view to developing new indicators to assess the state of the food webs in the future and thus properly defining the Stateâs Good Environmental Status.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.C.14. Increase awareness of food webs, with a view to developing new indicators to assess and define Good Environmental Status.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensuring social participation in the marine strategy of the Strait and Alboran area through initiatives for dissemination, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and involvement of stakeholders in the marine environment.
* Number of initiatives for social participation and evaluation of their results
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.3
|
Ensuring proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the Strait and Alboran area who carry out work related to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and to exploit synergies.
* Number of initiatives, projects and coordination meetings
* Thematic areas in which coordination initiatives are taken
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.4
|
To guarantee, through the Maritime Spatial Plan of the Canary Islands area and/or other development tools, that human activities take place in a sustainable manner and do not jeopardise the achievement of the Good Environmental Status.
* Number of human activities covered by the management plan
OBJECTIVE 2012: C1.5
|
To ensure that fish stocks are properly managed so that they remain within safe biological limits, paying particular attention to those whose status is unknown and to those who do not reach BEA according to the initial assessment of D3 in the sea demarcation of the Canary Islands
⢠No and percentage of stocks analysed in relation to the total of stocks that are significantly exploited
⢠No. and percentage of stocks within safe biological limits
⢠No and percentage of stocks at maximum sustainable yield
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.6
|
To promote that human actions do not significantly increase the surface area affected by physical loss of natural marine resources compared to the previous cycle in the Canary Islands area.
* Surface affected by permanent physical alterations caused by human activities
* Area in the area occupied by coastal defence works
* Area covered by the area occupied by works or by installations having as their object other than the defence of the coast
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.2.1
|
To promote that the biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of protected habitats or natural interests and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of the GES for these habitats.
* Percentage of compatibility reports on existing installations.
* Area of protected habitats of natural interest affected by permanent physical alterations.
|
Measures on stretches of coastline where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so as to be compatible with the good environmental status of the seabed and hydrographical conditions.
⢠No of measures taken in respect of each activity causing significant impact
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.2.3
|
Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information for both administrations and institutions related to the sea, and for the general public.
⢠Existence of platforms for access and exchange of information on the marine environment which facilitate the management of public administrations
⢠Means of access and quality of marine environment information available to citizens
⢠Number of metadata available
OBJECTIVE C.3.1
|
To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-native species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation.
* Number of policy/control measures on pathways and vectors for introduction and translocation
* Number of introduction and translocation routes and translocation addressed by policy or regulated measures, such as: Leakages in aquaculture facilities, ballast water, anchoring, 'biofouling', live bait, and all types of discharges.
* Number of events of introduction of invasive non-indigenous species by vector/track
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.2
|
Encourage scientific studies and projects to address knowledge gaps identified in the initial assessment of the impact of human activities on marine and coastal ecosystems.
* No. of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with these subjects.
* Knowledge-based studies and scientific projects.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.5
|
Improving knowledge on the effects of climate change on marine and coastal ecosystems, with a view to mainstreaming climate change variable into all phases of Marine Strategies
* Number of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with this issue
* Number of monitoring indicators addressing climate change aspects
* Percentage of climate change strategies in Marine Strategies
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.5
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through scientific studies, initiatives and projects on the impact of human activities on habitats, species, populations and communities
* Criteria for evaluation and monitoring of the results of scientific projects/studies (based on the references in documents)
* Objectives and management measures for which the design has taken into account the results of scientific projects/studies
|
Reducing the disturbance to fauna caused by tourist and recreational activities
* Number of individuals of the species potentially affected (for turtles and birds)
* Number of established protection measures/initiatives to reduce pressure on these populations
|
. To prevent impacts on trophic webs of the cultivation of marine species, with a focus on the cultivation of non-native and rare species.
⢠Existence of preventive measures within the control programmes.
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.5
|
Feature(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timescale |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
Update date |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
Update type |
Target no longer needed |
New target |
New target |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Target no longer needed |
Modified from 2012 definition |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Modified from 2012 definition |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
Marine reporting unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
Especies alóctonas invasoras |
Aves marinas |
Mamíferos marinos |
Reptiles marinos |
erizo Diadema aff. antillarum |
praderas de fanerógamas marinas |
elasmobranquios |
Mamíferos, aves, tortugas |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Extent
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter - other |
All parameters
|
Existence of coordination system
|
Existence of surveillance systems
|
measures on vectors for introduction
|
Number of species to be tested
|
existence of control programmes
|
Existencia de programas de control
|
Catalogue reviews
|
Participation in initiatives
|
Social participation initiatives
|
Coordination actions
|
Parameters used in the evaluation of D3
|
Heath condition
|
Degree of access
|
Fishing activity data
|
Number of stocks
|
existence of indicators
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - upper |
2.0 |
1.6 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
square kilometre
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit - other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target status |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2108 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target assessment description |
(SEE 9 GES reporting for the different arbitrators)
objective 0 is considered unnecessary since it coincides with the main aim of the Directive: Achieve BEA in all descriptors
|
Progress was noted. Is necessary
continue along this line
The wording of this objective is
it corresponds better to a measure.
Edit wording to bring it into line with
an objective, and the indicator to
measure achievement can be measured
of the
Further divide the target into two:
one aiming at the improvement of the
coordination of programmes of
monitoring of species and habitats, and
another focus on berections and
incidental catches. In the latter,
in addition, it is proposed to include a
explicit reference to improving
follow-up of incidental catch
for the fisheries sector
(target proposed in the framework of the
Istic seas II for Macaronesia)
|
Progress was noted.
There are active surveillance systems in place in
on the spot, however, it is envisaged to complete the
monitoring of Marine Spaces
Protected (PME).
Surveillance systems also exist
remote, such as buoys, satellites,
geolocalisation of vessels, by
radio (AIS) and satellite (VMS), etc.
It is proposed to change the objective of
focus more on the
monitoring compliance
rules laid down in the interest of the
ecosystem protection
seafarers
Edit indicator to provide input
information on the grade of
surveillance performed, such as number
of infringement dossiers,
surveillance or human resources
intended for the purpose
|
In process. Despite the fact that it is
have implemented a number of
actions on introduction pathways, and
that the outcome of the evaluation of the
Descriptor 2 proved to be
Good Environmental Conditionâ, is considered to be
that no key vectors have been addressed
for introduction and translocation of
non-indigenous species in the Canary Islands, such as the
Biouling.
See initial evaluation of D2 of the
DMCAN
Actions:
Convention on Waters of Lakes
IMO (in force since 2017)
Implementation of the Regulation
Community species on species
IS
Dredging guidelines
It is proposed to maintain the objective,
to continue along the same line,
although you do not list the possible pathways
in the objective, to shorten this and to:
do not limit possibilities.
An indicator should be added
providing information
the number or percentage of tracks
and anthropogenic vectors of
translocation addressed by measures
acting or regulated. It is proposed
it should also include this objective in the
group C as it is aimed at
making activities compatible
human beings with conservation
marine environment
|
Objective achieved.
In accordance with Initial Assessment of D2
in the case of the Canary Islands, non-indigenous species
they have not increased.
decreased and do not pose a threat
marine habitats
It is proposed to change the target.
as the eradication of
is very poor invasive species
complex and really in many
cases cannot be addressed. SE
proposes to transform it into a
integrated management target covering prevention (networks of
early detection) and measures of
management, thus covering this objective, and
C.3.6.
|
Results MISTIC SECAS II
Birds: In general, there is not enough
data to assess the target in
seabird species
|
Results MISTIC SECAS II
Mammals: For most of the
assessed species, no data
sufficient to assess this objective.
However, the sperm whale seems not to be
achieve BEA for Criterion D1C1, a
collisions with ships caused by collisions with vessels
|
Results MISTIC SECAS II
Turtles: There is not enough data for
evaluate the target in species of
Sea turtles.
|
Cannot be evaluated. No information on the indicator.
There are measures such as: in RN2000, non-native species cannot be grown
It is proposed that the aim be maintained, on the proposal of the experts and by the foreseeable rise of aquaculture. The indicator will be changed to "prevention measures in control programmes" as the existence of the programmes themselves is mandatory.
Switch to group C
|
Se detectan progresos:
Campaña de control del erizo Diadema
antillarum del Gobierno de Canarias
Se propone unir al objetivo A.1.7.
Aunque el erizo diadema sea una
especie propia de las aguas canarias,
su excesiva proliferación la ha
convertido en una especie invasora
causante de graves daños a los
fondos rocosos.
|
Progress was noted. Is necessary
continue along this line
The control campaign of the Auchizo Diadema
Canary Islands government anti-llarum
It is proposed to link objective A.1.6.
It is proposed to add:
Number of initiatives/actions
to reduce or prevent the increase of
populations of the urchin Diadea affin.
Antillarum
|
The objective is implicit in
objective C.1. Include the
specific Indicator of Coverage
phanerogams, and special
reference to the letters as pressure
|
Cannot be evaluated. No information
on the indicator.
It is proposed to delete as it is
more than an objective.
The substance of the objective is retained
through amendment of A.1.4.
|
Depending on the species.
See initial evaluation of D1 of the
DMCAN (Macaronesia Roof Report)
It is proposed to change the target for
better reflecting the balance of all
the ecosystem as a whole, not only
the populations of certain
species
|
Since 2012, 2 reviews were carried out (in 2015 and 2016) of the List of Wild Species in Special Protection Regime and the Spanish Catalogue of Endangered Species. The Canary Islands (Cymodocea nodosa) has been included in the category âvulnerableâ.
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue this line.
The wording is considered to be closer to the concrete measure than is the case. It is proposed to change the target so as to approach marine species on the list of threatened species.
The indicator could be changed to reflect the number of marine species that are/discatalogued or change category on the list of threatened species.
An indicator showing whether stock assessments are ongoing should also be added.
It is proposed to move to type A, as it is a tool to ensure the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity.
|
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue along this line
Spain has actively participated in MISTIC SEAS I projects, which was designed to design and test joint monitoring programmes between Spain and Portugal for turtles, mammals and seabirds in the Macaronesian region.
ICCAT evaluation groups
It is proposed to keep the objective with drafting changes, in order to make it more suitable for an objective, as it currently could correspond to a specific measure.
It is proposed to move to type A, as it is a tool to ensure the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity.
|
Objective achieved:
Expert PdS workshops: 14 (Workshops and meetings with administrations and survey)
Expert workshop for the design of the MIP: 21
⢠Dissemination: 1 workshop (by DM),
⢠1 Dissemination campaign (dissemination materials)
⢠2 CONAMAS
⢠Education and participation projects: 7 (BIO) including INTEMARES
⢠volunteering campaigns
⢠meetings with sectors: 1 workshop on socio-economic analysis
⢠public consultation of documents from the Member States: 3
⢠Public consultation of project results MISTIC SEAS: 2
It is proposed to keep this objective for the second cycle, so as to ensure social participation in the Member States.
|
Target achieved
⢠ICES meetings: 6
⢠meetings meetings of the CAN Monitoring Committee: 6
⢠Autonomous Community meetings on marine biodiversity: 7
⢠Generating DMCAN data flow
⢠Working groups:
WG Biodiversity: 1
Marine cartography: 10
Descriptor 9 GT: 1
WG Seat-Data: 2
WG Technical WG Costa: 6
⢠Meetings with sectors: 1 workshop on socio-economic analysis
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by improving the wording for the second cycle, to make further progress in the coordination of public administrations.
It is proposed to add as indicator:
âNumber of thematic areas in which coordination initiatives are taken, compared to the previous cycleâ.
|
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue along this line
See initial evaluation of D3 in the DMCAN.
It is proposed that the aim should be maintained, by improving the wording and focusing on all stocks that fall outside the scope of the BEA.
|
The objective is considered to have been achieved
Indicator value for the period 2011-2016: 1 583 816 m². 0.0003 % of the area of the Demarcación Canario has been affected by permanent physical alterations in the period under examination (2011-2016).
See evaluation of the pressure âphysical lossesâ on the DMCAN.
It is proposed to amend as it is very similar to criterion D6C1. It could be transformed into a pressure target so as to ensure that new activities of human activities do not significantly increase the surface area affected by physical loss of natural marine resources compared to the previous cycle.
The indicators may also distinguish the area occupied by coastal defence infrastructure from which they do not have this objective.
|
It is not possible to assess precisely.
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by improving the wording.
It is proposed to modify the indicator in a way that is quantifiable, and to add another concerning the proportion of compatibility reports on existing installations.
|
Cannot be evaluated
|
Target achieved
All Member State documents are publicly available on MITECOâs website.
However, it can be improved.
For the second cycle, it is proposed to specify and extend the target audience, so as to improve access to information on the marine environment available to all maritime administrations and institutions, as well as to the general public.
|
Progress detected
There are data that provide information on the professional fishing activity provided by the SGP, which could not be analysed in depth.
There are also data on recreational fishing and shellfishing activities (licences, et).
It is proposed to delete the target, as this information is collected, through the monitoring programmes.
|
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue this line.
It is proposed to remove the objective since it overlaps with the implementation of commercial species monitoring programmes.
|
Progress was detected.
As can be seen in the initial assessment of D4 in the DMCAN, progress has been made in the area of OSPAR in this regard.
It is proposed to maintain, with a simpler wording, as it fully matches the needs of D4.
It is proposed to go to type A.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|