Member State report / Art10 / 2018 / D1-B / Finland / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Birds |
Member State | Finland |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Finnish Environment Institute |
Report date | 2019-04-10 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART10_Targets_3Jan2019.xml |
Target code |
AINE4 |
ALUE1 |
LUONTO1 |
LUONTO2 |
LUONTO3 |
LUONTO5 |
LUVA3 |
LUVAyleinen |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target description |
Response capacity for oil and chemical accidents is secured. |
Maritime spatial planning is carried out in a way that it advances the achievement of good environmental status in marine environment. |
Marine protected areas cover at least 10% of each of the five marine areas and form an ecologically coherent network. |
Marine protected areas will effectively protect the features for which they have been established. Within-MPA pressures will be lower than outside in order to ensure habitats’ and species’ viability and favourable conservation status. Management plans will be made on the basis of the local underwater nature and the pressures threatening it. |
Disturbing or adversely affecting traffic and human presence and activities decrease in marine protected areas. |
Abundance of raccoon dog and American mink decreases in waterbird breeding areas and are eradicated from selected MPAs. |
Hunting game bag of common eider (Somateria mollissima) and long-tailed duck (Clangula hyemalis) will be on sustainable level and in balance with the state of the populations. |
Use of natural resources is ecologically sustainable and does not risk achieving or maintaining good state. |
|||||||||
Feature(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
GES components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Timescale |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
|||||||||
Update date |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
|||||||||
Update type |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
Modified from 2012 definition |
|||||||||
Marine reporting unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
Contaminants (oil, chemicals) |
Recognition of goals |
Marine Protected Areas |
Marine protected areas |
Marine Protected Areas |
Marine protected areas |
Marine Protected Areas |
Raccoon dog and American mink |
Waterbirds |
Clangula hyemalis |
Somateria mollissima |
Seals, fish and birds |
Seals, fish, birds |
||||
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||||
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
||||
Parameter - other |
Frequency and extent of response training
|
Marine spatial planning
|
Illegal presence within MPAs
|
Hunting of nuisance species
|
|||||||||||||
Target value |
|||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - upper |
|||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - lower |
|||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
(number of) individuals
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
(number of) individuals
|
(number of) individuals
|
(number of) individuals
|
(number of) individuals
|
|||
Value unit - other |
Number of training e
|
Spatial plans
|
events
|
||||||||||||||
Target status |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
||||
Assessment period |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
||||
Target assessment description |
Frequent training in sufficient extent.
|
Maritime spatial planning is carried out in a way that it advances the achievement of good environmental status in marine environment. |
Marine protected areas cover at least 10% of the Finnish waters and each of the five marine areas and form an ecologically coherent network. |
Marine protected areas cover at least 10% of the Finnish waters and each of the five marine areas and form an ecologically coherent network. |
Marine protected areas will effectively protect the features for which they have been established. Within-MPA pressures will be lower than outside in order to ensure habitats’ and species’ viability and favourable conservation status. Management plans will be made on the basis of the local underwater nature and the pressures threatening it. |
Marine protected areas will effectively protect the features for which they have been established. Within-MPA pressures will be lower than outside in order to ensure habitats’ and species’ viability and favourable conservation status. Management plans will be made on the basis of the local underwater nature and the pressures threatening it. |
Disturbing or adversely affecting traffic and human presence and activities decrease in marine protected areas. |
Abundance of raccoon dog and American mink decreases in waterbird breeding areas and are eradicated from selected MPAs. |
Abundance of waterbirds in breeding areas increases |
Hunting game bag of long-tailed duck (Clangula hyemalis) will be on sustainable level and in balance with the state of the population. |
Hunting game bag of common eider (Somateria mollissima) will be on sustainable level and in balance with the state of the population. |
Use of natural resources is ecologically sustainable and does not risk achieving or maintaining good state. |
Use of natural resources is ecologically sustainable and does not risk achieving or maintaining good state. |
||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|