Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-B / Finland / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Birds |
Member State | Finland |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Finnish Environment Institute |
Report date | 2019-04-10 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART8_GES_8Jan2019update_24_.xml |
National part of Åland Sea (BAL-FI-AS)
GES component |
D1-B
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
||||||||
Element |
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped) |
Grazing birds (grouped) |
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped) |
Surface-feeding birds (grouped) |
Wading birds (grouped) |
||||||||
Element code |
FI_Birds_benthicF |
FI_Birds_grazing |
FI_Birds_pelagicF |
FI_Birds_surfaceF |
FI_Birds_wading |
||||||||
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
||||||||
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
||||||||
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Abundance
|
Parameter other |
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
|
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
|
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
33.0 |
67.0 |
80.0 |
71.0 |
80.0 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
||||||||
Value unit other |
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Yes, based on low risk |
No |
Yes, based on low risk |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes, based on low risk |
No |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Description parameter |
Bycatch of long-tailed duck is suspected from this assessment unit. |
HELCOM core indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
|
The hunting of long-tailed duck has increased in the recent year to 10-15000 ind. but the hunting of the common eider has decreased to ca 2000 ind. in the entire country
No mass mortality of birds has taken place. |
No reported bycatch of grazing birds
|
HELCOM core indicators: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
|
In average ca 7000 greylag geese are shot each year in the entire country.
No mass mortality of birds has takenplace in this assessment unit. |
Bycatch of black guillemots is reported from this assessment unit. |
HELCOM core indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season
|
No hunting of pelagic feeding birds.
Zero mass mortality of these in this assessment unit.
Culling of great cormorant is about 700 ind. per year. |
No reported bycatch of surface-feeding birds.
|
HELCOM core indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season
|
No mass mortality of surface feeding birds has taken in this assessment unit.
No hunting takes place but some culling of gulls is permitted. |
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf |
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Not good |
Good, based on low risk |
Unknown |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Not good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Description criteria |
|||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
||||||||
Description element |
|||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. |
||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
Interim rule applied
|
Interim rule applied
|
Interim rule applied
|
Interim rule applied
|
Interim rule applied
|
||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES achieved |
||||||||
Description overall status |
.
|
Only one criterion (abundance) was used.
Only breeding wading birds occur in the area. |
|||||||||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
||||||||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
National part of Bothnian Bay (BAL-FI-BB)
GES component |
D1-B
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
||||||||
Element |
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped) |
Grazing birds (grouped) |
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped) |
Surface-feeding birds (grouped) |
Wading birds (grouped) |
||||||||
Element code |
FI_Birds_benthicF |
FI_Birds_grazing |
FI_Birds_pelagicF |
FI_Birds_surfaceF |
FI_Birds_wading |
||||||||
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
||||||||
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
||||||||
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Abundance
|
Parameter other |
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
|
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
|
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
50.0 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
Number of bycaught individuals
|
%
|
Individuals
|
Number of bycaught individuals
|
%
|
Individuals
|
Number of bycaught individuals
|
%
|
Individuals
|
Number of bycaught individuals
|
%
|
Individuals
|
%
|
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
No |
Description parameter |
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
|
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf |
No bird mass mortalities have occurred in this assessment unit. |
No bycaught individuals in the assessment unit.
|
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf |
Hunting has decreased in recent decades. In average, 7000 greylag geese were shot in the whole country annually 2011-2016. No mass mortalities have occurred in the assessment unit. |
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
|
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf |
No bird mass mortalities have occurred in this assessment unit. |
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
|
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf |
No bird mass mortalities have occurred in this assessment unit. |
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf |
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The indicators on hunting and mass mosrtalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
|||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
||||||||
Description element |
|||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species). |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species). |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species). |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species). |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species). |
||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
|||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
Interim rule applied.
|
Interim rule applied.
|
Interim rule applied.
|
Interim rule applied.
|
|||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
||||||||
Description overall status |
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area. |
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area. |
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area. |
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area. |
Only one criterion (abundance) was used.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area. |
||||||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
||||||||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
National part of Bothnian Sea (BAL-FI-BS)
GES component |
D1-B
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
||||||||
Element |
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped) |
Grazing birds (grouped) |
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped) |
Surface-feeding birds (grouped) |
Wading birds (grouped) |
||||||||
Element code |
FI_Birds_benthicF |
FI_Birds_grazing |
FI_Birds_pelagicF |
FI_Birds_surfaceF |
FI_Birds_wading |
||||||||
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
||||||||
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
||||||||
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Abundance
|
Parameter other |
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
|
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
|
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
|||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
75
|
75
|
75
|
75
|
75
|
||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
67.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
50.0 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
|||||||
Value unit other |
%
|
individuals
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes, based on low risk |
No |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
No |
Description parameter |
No bycatch of benthic-feeding birds has been reported from this assessment unit. |
HELCOM core indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
|
The hunting of long-tailed duck has increased in the recent year to 10-15000 ind. but the hunting of the common eider has decreased to ca 2000 ind.
No mass mortality of birds has taken place. |
No bycatch of grazing birds is reported in the assessment unit. |
HELCOM core indicators: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
|
Hunting of , in average 7000, greylag geese takes place annually in the entire country.
No mass mortality of birds in the assessment unit. |
Black guillemot is reported being bycaught in this assessment unit. |
HELCOM core indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
|
No hunting of pelagic feeding birds and no mass mortality of them occurs in this assessment unit.
Great cormorant is abundances and breeding colonies are, however, controlled by culling and destroying nests. This has increased during the assessment period and ca. 700 individuals are shot each year. |
Zero reported surface-feeding bird species in the assessment unit. |
HELCOM core indicators: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
|
No hunting of surface-feeding birds takes place and no mass mortality has taken place in the assessment unit. |
|
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good, based on low risk |
Not good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
||||||||
Description element |
|||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species). |
||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
Interim rule applied
|
Interim rule applied
|
Interim rule applied
|
Interim rule applied
|
|||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
||||||||
Description overall status |
.
|
Only one criterion (abundance) was used.
Wintering wading birds do not occur in the area. |
|||||||||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
||||||||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
National part of Gulf of Finland (BAL-FI-GF)
GES component |
D1-B
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
||||||||
Element |
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped) |
Grazing birds (grouped) |
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped) |
Surface-feeding birds (grouped) |
Wading birds (grouped) |
||||||||
Element code |
FI_Birds_benthicF |
FI_Birds_grazing |
FI_Birds_pelagicF |
FI_Birds_surfaceF |
FI_Birds_wading |
||||||||
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
||||||||
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
||||||||
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Abundance
|
Parameter other |
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
|
Abundance of breeding water birds
|
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
33.0 |
100.0 |
67.0 |
17.0 |
67.0 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
||||||||
Value unit other |
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes, based on low risk |
No |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
Bycatch of two species have been reported.
|
No mass mortality of benthic feeders has taken place.
Each year ca 14000 long-tailed ducks and ca 2000 common eiders are hunted in the entire country. |
Zero bycatch of grazing birds.
|
HELCOM core indicators: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
|
A mass mortality event of barnacle geese took place in 2017 with 131 died birds found.
Hunting of greylag geese is in average 7000 per year in the entire country. |
Some bycatch of black guillemot has been reported from this assessment unit. |
No hunting of pelagic feeding birds and no mass mortality of them occurs in this assessment unit.
Great cormorant is abundances and breeding colonies are, however, controlled by culling and destroying nests. This has increased during the assessment period and ca. 700 individuals are shot each year. |
Zero bycatch reported for surface feeders in this assessment unit. |
A mass mortality event of herring gulls (462 died observed) in 2017.
No hunting of surface feeders but some permitted culling of herring gulls. |
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf |
|||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The mass mortality and hunting indicators reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The mass mortality and hunting indicators reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The mass mortality and hunting indicators reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The mass mortality and hunting indicators reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
|||||
Element status |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
||||||||
Description element |
|||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios . |
||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
||||||||
Description overall status |
Only one criterion (abundance) was used.
Wintering wading birds do not occur in the area. |
||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
||||||||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
National part of The Quark (BAL-FI-QK)
GES component |
D1-B
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
||||||||
Element |
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped) |
Grazing birds (grouped) |
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped) |
Surface-feeding birds (grouped) |
Wading birds (grouped) |
||||||||
Element code |
FI_Birds_benthicF |
FI_Birds_grazing |
FI_Birds_pelagicF |
FI_Birds_surfaceF |
FI_Birds_wading |
||||||||
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
||||||||
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
||||||||
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Survival rate
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Abundance of breeding birds
|
Abundance of breeding birds
|
Abundance of breeding birds
|
Abundance of breeding birds
|
Abundance of breeding birds
|
||||||||
Threshold value upper |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
https://webforms.eionet.europa.eu/download/user_file?fileId=70077
|
https://webforms.eionet.europa.eu/download/user_file?fileId=70077
|
https://webforms.eionet.europa.eu/download/user_file?fileId=70077
|
https://webforms.eionet.europa.eu/download/user_file?fileId=70077
|
|||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
67.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
50.0 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Value unit other |
individuals
|
individuals
|
individuals
|
individuals
|
individuals
|
individuals
|
individuals
|
individuals
|
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes, based on low risk |
No |
Unknown |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
No |
Description parameter |
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
|
In average 14300 ducks are shot annually on the coast and this number has decreased.
No mass mortality has taken place in this assessment unit. |
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
|
In average 7000 greylag geese are shot annually in the whole country. No mass mortalities have occurred in this assessment unit. |
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
|
In average 700 great cormorants are culled each year in the country (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/pressures-and-their-status/species-removal-by-fishing-and-hunting/#hunting-of-waterbirds).
No mass mortalities occur in this assessment unit. |
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
|
No hunting of these bird species and no mass mortality occurs in this assessment unit. |
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf |
||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good, based on low risk |
Not good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'. |
|||||
Element status |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
||||||||
Description element |
|||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
MULTIMETRIC
|
||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species). |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species). |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species). |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species). |
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species). |
||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
|||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
Interim rule applied.
|
Interim rule applied.
|
Interim rule applied.
|
Interim rule applied.
|
|||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
||||||||
Description overall status |
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area. |
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area. |
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area. |
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area. |
Only one criterion (abundance) was used.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area. |
||||||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
||||||||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|