Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D1-C / Finland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2012-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Cephalopods |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | Team of experts from: - several Finnish Institutes, - Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment - The Ministry of Enviroment |
| Report date | 2012-11-09 |
| Report access | MSFD10TI_20130515_140728.xml |
BAL-FI-RG-Baltic_Sea
Feature [Target or Indicator code] |
D1.5 |
1.1.1 |
1.1.3 |
1.2.1 |
1.3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent] |
D1-C
|
D1C4
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
|
MarineUnitID |
|
||||
Method used |
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
|
||||
Description [Targets] |
The community structure of all habitats must match the ecosystems of the viable bottom;
|
Range of seal distribution
|
Distribution of breeding populations of aquatic birds (fish and shellfish)
|
Hibernation and waterbird abundance
|
Number of species at favourable conservation status under the Habitats Directive and the Birds Directive
|
Threshold value [TargetValue] |
|||||
Reference point type |
TargetReferencePoint |
TargetReferencePoint |
|||
Baseline |
current level
|
current level
|
|||
Proportion |
|||||
Assessment method |
|||||
Development status |
operational by 2014 |
fully operational |
operational by 2014 |
fully operational |
|
Type of target/indicator |
State |
||||
Timescale |
|||||
Interim or GES target |
GES |
||||
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators |
|||||
Physical/chemical features |
|||||
Predominant habitats |
|
|
|||
Functional group |
|
|
|||
Pressures |
|
||||