Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D2 / Finland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2012-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D2 Non-indigenous species |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | Team of experts from: - several Finnish Institutes, - Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment - The Ministry of Enviroment |
| Report date | 2012-11-09 |
| Report access | MSFD10TI_20130515_140728.xml |
BAL-FI-RG-Baltic_Sea
Feature [Target or Indicator code] |
D2 |
2.1.1 |
|---|---|---|
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent] |
D2
|
D2C2
|
MarineUnitID |
|
|
Method used |
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
|
|
Description [Targets] |
The ultimate aim is to prevent the introduction of alien species, with the ultimate aim of slowing down the arrival rate of alien species. In addition, the objective is that the adverse effects of harmful and highly harmful mammalian species have been minimised in areas of special interest for the archipelago.
|
Introduction of new alien species
|
Threshold value [TargetValue] |
||
Reference point type |
LimitReferencePoint |
|
Baseline |
current level
|
|
Proportion |
||
Assessment method |
||
Development status |
fully operational |
|
Type of target/indicator |
Pressure |
|
Timescale |
||
Interim or GES target |
GES |
|
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators |
||
Physical/chemical features |
||
Predominant habitats |
||
Functional group |
||
Pressures |
|
|