Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D6 / France / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats
Member State France
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
Reported by Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire
Report date 2020-02-19
Report access ART8_GES_FR_2020-02-17.xml

UMR GdG Nord (ABI-FR-MS-GDG-NORD)

GES component
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
Feature
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Physical disturbance to seabed
Physical loss of the seabed
Element
Abyssal
Circalittoral coarse sediment
Circalittoral mixed sediment
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef
Circalittoral sand
Infralittoral coarse sediment
Infralittoral mixed sediment
Infralittoral mud
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef
Infralittoral sand
Lower bathyal sediment
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment
Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment
Offshore circalittoral mud
Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef
Offshore circalittoral sand
Upper bathyal sediment
Element code
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenCircalitCoarSed
HabBenCircalitMxdSed
HabBenCircalitMud
HabBenCircalitRock
HabBenCircalitSand
HabBenInfralitCoarSed
HabBenInfralitMxdSed
HabBenInfralitMud
HabBenInfralitRock
HabBenInfralitSand
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenOffshCoarSed
HabBenOffshMxdSed
HabBenOffshMud
HabBenOffshRock
HabBenOffshSand
HabBenBathyalUpSed
Element code source
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
Criterion
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C2
D6C1
Parameter
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
1631.6
3000.1
1682.4
1183.8
2124.0
1793.9
200.2
5.5
80.2
307.2
220.2
2700.6
3018.8
3140.8
16198.8
1264.2
11439.1
5941.4
56006.0
77.1
Proportion threshold value unit
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of pressure
extent in km2 of pressure
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "abyssal zone" habitat is 1631.6 km², i.e. 3.9% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral coarse sediment" habitat is 3000.1 km², i.e. 95% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral heterogeneous sediment" habitat is 1682.4 km², i.e. 99.3% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this RMU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the RMU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral mud" habitat is 1183.8 km², i.e. 91.9% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this RMU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the RMU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 2124 km², i.e. 92.1% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this UMR was assessed, in the context of D6C2, as representing approximately 57% of the surface of the MRU, in particular on the continental shelf area. As a result, on the plateau, many large habitat types are potentially disturbed almost entirely, while offshore, the abyssal area is relatively undisturbed. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral sands" habitat is of 1793.9 km², or 96.3% of the total area of habitat in the north of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. Note that no threshold is currently available to assess whether the parameter has been reached or not.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse subtidal sediment" habitat is 200.2 km², i.e. 51.7% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "heterogeneous sub-shore sediment" habitat is 5.5 km², i.e. 24.9% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral mud" habitat is 80.2 km², i.e. 39.1% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "subtidal biogenic rock and reef" habitat is 307.2 km², i.e. 54.9% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral sands" habitat is 220.2 km², i.e. 60.7% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "lower bathyal sediment" habitat is 2700.6 km², i.e. 56.6% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse circalittoral offshore sediment" habitat is 3018.8 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral heterogeneous sediment" habitat is 3140.8 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral mud" habitat is 16198.8 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral biogenic rock and reef" habitat is 1264.2 km², or 99.9% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral sands" habitat is 11439.1 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in D6C2 as approximately 57% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "upper bathyal sediment" habitat is 5941.4 km², i.e. 98.3% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The spatial extent of the potential physical disturbance of the seabed represents more than 56,000 km², i.e. about 57% of the surface area of the MRU. The results of the assessment show that almost 100% of this potential physical disturbance is attributable to commercial trawl fishing. The other activities generating potential physical pressure are, in decreasing order: aquaculture, dumping of dredged material, extraction of materials and, to a lesser extent, moorings, coastal development and dredging. The reliability of these results is low as there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various D6C2 indicators. It should also be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
Of the 77.1 km² of potential physical loss of the seabed (i.e. less than 0.1% of the surface area of this MRU), more than 50% is due to the dumping of dredged material, nearly 30% is due to the extraction of materials, 19% is due to coastal structures and more than 2% is due to dredging. The reliability of these results is low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators of the D6C1. It should also be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Description criteria
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the assessment of the D6C3 criterion has to be carried out for each habitat type and the results of D6C3 are not integrated. Moreover, no threshold has been defined to date for the "Scope" parameter: the status of criterion D6C3 is therefore not filled in. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "abyssal zone" habitat is 1631.6 km², i.e. 3.9% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the assessment of the D6C3 criterion has to be carried out for each habitat type and the results of D6C3 are not integrated. Moreover, no threshold has been defined to date for the "Scope" parameter: the status of criterion D6C3 is therefore not filled in. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral coarse sediment" habitat is 3000.1 km², i.e. 95% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the assessment of the D6C3 criterion has to be carried out for each habitat type and the results of D6C3 are not integrated. Moreover, no threshold has been defined to date for the "Scope" parameter: the status of criterion D6C3 is therefore not filled in. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral heterogeneous sediment" habitat is 1682.4 km², i.e. 99.3% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the assessment of the D6C3 criterion has to be carried out for each habitat type and the results of D6C3 are not integrated. Moreover, no threshold has been defined to date for the "Scope" parameter: the status of criterion D6C3 is therefore not filled in. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral mud" habitat is 1183.8 km², i.e. 91.9% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the assessment of the D6C3 criterion has to be carried out for each habitat type and the results of D6C3 are not integrated. Moreover, no threshold has been defined to date for the "Scope" parameter: the status of criterion D6C3 is therefore not filled in. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 2124 km², i.e. 92.1% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral sands" habitat is 1793.9 km², i.e. 96.3% of the total surface area of the habitat in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse subtidal sediment" habitat is 200.2 km², i.e. 51.7% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "subtidal heterogeneous sediment" habitat is 5.5 km², i.e. 24.9% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral mud" habitat is 80.2 km², i.e. 39.1% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "subtidal biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 307.2 km², i.e. 54.9% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral sands" habitat is 220.2 km², i.e. 60.7% of the total surface area of the habitat in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the surfaces subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "lower bathyal sediment" habitat is 2700.6 km², i.e. 56.6% of the total area of the habitat in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The total spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse circalittoral offshore sediment" habitat is 3018.8 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the northern Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment" habitat is 3140.8 km², i.e. 100% of the total area of the habitat in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral mud" habitat is 16198.8 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 1264.2 km², i.e. 99.9% of the total surface area of the habitat in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the surfaces subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The total spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral sands" habitat is 11439.1 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the north of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "upper bathyal sediment" habitat is 5941.4 km², i.e. 98.3% of the total habitat area in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017) no threshold is to be specified for D6C2: the status of the D6C2 criterion is therefore not reported. However, the assessment of criterion D6C2 shows that the spatial extent of the potential physical disturbance of the seabed is 56 000 km², i.e. about 57% of the area of the MRU. Although the use of available data on professional troll fishing increases the actual area under pressure, the assessment shows that almost 100% of the area of potential physical disturbance of the seabed is attributable to this activity.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017) no threshold is to be specified for D6C1: the status of the D6C1 criterion is therefore not reported. However, the assessment of criterion D6C1 shows that the potential physical losses represent an area of 77.1 km², i.e. less than 0.1% of the area of the MRU. The potential physical losses are mainly due to marine works (material extraction, coastal works, dredging, dumping).
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Description overall status
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Many major benthic habitat types are potentially disturbed over 90% of their extent (D6C3), primarily due to commercial trawl fishing. These are the 10 major circalittoral habitat types present in this MRU. The reliability of these results is considered to be low since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
Potential physical disturbances on the seabed are assessed on the basis of data relating to the anthropogenic activities likely to generate these pressures: coastal development, extraction of marine aggregates, dredging and dumping of dredged material, mooring, aquaculture and professional dragging arts fishing.The potential physical disturbances on the seabed (D6C2) represent an area of 56,000 km² in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region (approximately 57% of the MRU area). Although the use of available data on professional trolling increases the actual area under pressure, the assessment shows that almost 100% of the area of potential physical disturbance of the seabed is attributable to this activity. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in terms of the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations needed to assess the different indicators informing the D6C2.
Potential physical losses on the seabed are assessed on the basis of data on the anthropogenic activities likely to generate these pressures: coastal development, extraction of marine aggregates, dredging and dumping of dredged material. Potential physical losses from the seabed (D6C1) represent an area of 77.1 km² in the north of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region (i.e. less than 0.1% of the area of the Marine Sub-Region). The reliability of these results is considered to be low, as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, as well as in the assumptions and interpretations required for the assessment of D6C1.
Assessments period
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
Related pressures
Related targets

UMR GdG Sud (ABI-FR-MS-GDG-SUD)

GES component
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
Feature
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Physical disturbance to seabed
Physical loss of the seabed
Element
Abyssal
Circalittoral coarse sediment
Circalittoral mixed sediment
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef
Circalittoral sand
Infralittoral coarse sediment
Infralittoral mud
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef
Infralittoral sand
Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Lower bathyal sediment
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment
Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment
Offshore circalittoral mud
Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef
Offshore circalittoral sand
Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Upper bathyal sediment
Element code
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenCircalitCoarSed
HabBenCircalitMxdSed
HabBenCircalitMud
HabBenCircalitRock
HabBenCircalitSand
HabBenInfralitCoarSed
HabBenInfralitMud
HabBenInfralitRock
HabBenInfralitSand
HabBenBathyalLowRock
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenOffshCoarSed
HabBenOffshMxdSed
HabBenOffshMud
HabBenOffshRock
HabBenOffshSand
HabBenBathyalUpRock
HabBenBathyalUpSed
Element code source
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
Criterion
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C2
D6C1
Parameter
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
1139.4
2600.2
1176.3
1839.9
624.5
6517.6
13.1
59.8
123.5
527.6
805.7
2172.4
660.2
3637.8
1001.9
14511.0
2.3
3500.2
41163.0
68.9
Proportion threshold value unit
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of pressure
extent in km2 of pressure
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "abyssal zone" habitat is 1139.4 km², i.e. 2.7% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "circalittoral coarse sediment" habitat is 2600.2 km², i.e. 99.2% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral mixed sediment" habitat is 1176.3 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral mud" habitat is 1839.9 km², i.e. 95.2% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 624.5 km², i.e. 97.1% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral sands" habitat is 6517.6 km², i.e. 98.7% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse infralittoral sediment" habitat is 13.1 km², i.e. 41% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral mud" habitat is 59.8 km², i.e. 27.2% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed " infralittoral biogenic rocks and reefs " habitat is 123.5 km², i.e. 59.2% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral sands" habitat is 527.6 km², i.e. 80.7% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. Thus, on the shelf, many habitat types are almost totally potentially disturbed, while offshore, the abyssal zone is relatively little disturbed. Rocks and reefs in the lower bathyal could not be fully distinguished from sediments in the lower bathyal. As a result, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "lower bathyal sediments or rocks and reefs" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "lower bathyal sediment" habitat is 805.7 km², i.e. 22.1% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. In addition, it was not possible to fully differentiate between Lower Bathyal rocks and reefs and Lower Bathyal sediments. As a result, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "lower bathyal sediments or rocks and reefs" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this RMU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the RMU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse circalittoral offshore sediment" habitat is 2172.4 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this RMU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the RMU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral mixed sediment" habitat is 660.2 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this RMU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the RMU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral mud" habitat is 3637.8 km², i.e. 99.7% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this RMU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the RMU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 1001.9 km², i.e. 99.9% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral sands" habitat is 14511 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "Upper Bathyal Rocks and Reefs" habitat is 2.3 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. Furthermore, it was not possible to fully distinguish the rocks and reefs of the upper bathyal from the sediments of the upper bathyal. Consequently, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "sediments or rocks and reefs of the upper bathyal" habitat is 5.4 km², i.e. 39.4% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRU has been assessed in the D6C2 framework as representing more than 46% of the surface area of the MRU, particularly over the continental shelf area. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "upper bathyal sediment" habitat is 3500.2 km², i.e. 69.9% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. Furthermore, it was not possible to fully distinguish the rocks and reefs of the upper bathyal from the sediments of the upper bathyal. As a result, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "upper bathyal sediments or rocks and reefs" habitat is 5.4 km², i.e. 39.4% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The spatial extent of the potential physical disturbance of the seabed represents 41163 km², i.e. about 46% of the surface area of the MRU. The results of the assessment show that almost 100% of this potential physical disturbance is attributable to commercial trawl fishing. The other activities generating potential physical pressure are, in decreasing order of extent: aquaculture, dredged material dumping, moorings and, to a lesser extent, coastal development, marine aggregate extraction and dredging. The reliability of these results is low, however, as there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various D6C2 indicators. It should also be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
Of the 69 km² of potential physical loss of the seabed, i.e. less than 0.1% of the surface area of this MRU, approximately 70% concerns the dumping of dredged material and nearly 17% concerns coastal development. Activities related to dredging and the extraction of marine aggregates are less present in this MRU, resulting in limited potential physical losses (respectively 2% and 11% of the area of potential physical loss of the seabed). The reliability of these results is low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators of the D6C1. It should also be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Description criteria
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "abyssal zone" habitat is 1139.4 km², i.e. 2.7% of the total habitat surface area in the south of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the surfaces subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral coarse sediment" habitat is 2600.2 km², i.e. 99.2% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral mixed sediment" habitat is 1176.3 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay sub-marine region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral mud" habitat is 1839.9 km², i.e. 95.2% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 624.5 km², i.e. 97.1% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral sands" habitat is 6517.6 km², i.e. 98.7% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging arts fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse infralittoral sediment" habitat is 13.1 km², i.e. 41% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay sub-marine region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. For the infralittoral mud flats, another activity is responsible for significant potential physical disturbance: aquaculture, responsible for 18% of the potentially disturbed surface area (fishing being responsible for 78% of the potential disturbance). The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral mud" habitat is 59.8 km², i.e. 27.2% of the total surface area of the habitat in the south of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the surfaces subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging arts fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed " infralittoral biogenic rocks and reefs " habitat is 123.5 km², i.e. 59.2% of the total surface area of the habitat in the south of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the surfaces subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral sands" habitat is 527.6 km², i.e. 80.7% of the total surface area of the habitat in the south of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The relative surfaces and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the surfaces subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The rocks and reefs of the lower bathyal could not be fully distinguished from the sediments of the lower bathyal. As a result, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "sediments or rocks and reefs of the lower bathyal" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total surface area of the habitat in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "lower bathyal sediment" habitat is 805.7 km², i.e. 22.1% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. In addition, it was not possible to fully differentiate between Lower Bathyal rocks and reefs and Lower Bathyal sediments. As a result, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "sediments or rocks and reefs of the lower bathyal" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total surface area of the habitat in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The relative surfaces and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly because of the data and the method used to characterise the surfaces subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The total spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse circalittoral offshore sediment" habitat is 2172.4 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the southern Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral mixed sediment" habitat is 660.2 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the southern Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The relative surfaces and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly because of the data and the method used to characterise the surfaces subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral mud" habitat is 3637.8 km², i.e. 99.7% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 1001.9 km², i.e. 99.9% of the total surface area of the habitat in the southern Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The total spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral sands" habitat is 14511 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay sub-marine region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "Upper Bathyal Rocks and Reefs" habitat is 2.3 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay Marine Sub-Region. Furthermore, it was not possible to fully distinguish the rocks and reefs of the upper bathyal from the sediments of the upper bathyal. As a result, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "sediments or rocks and reefs of the upper bathyal" habitat is 5.4 km², i.e. 39.4% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "upper bathyal sediment" habitat is 3500.2 km², i.e. 69.9% of the total habitat area in the southern Bay of Biscay sub-marine region. Furthermore, it was not possible to fully distinguish the rocks and reefs of the upper bathyal from the sediments of the upper bathyal. As a result, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "sediments or rocks and reefs of the upper bathyal" habitat is 5.4 km², i.e. 39.4% of the total habitat area in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017) no threshold is to be specified for D6C2: the status of the D6C2 criterion is therefore not reported. However, the assessment of criterion D6C2 shows that the spatial extent of the potential physical disturbance of the seabed represents 41163 km², i.e. 46% of the surface area of the MRU, essentially on the continental shelf area. Although the use of available data on professional troll fishing increases the actual area under pressure, the assessment shows that almost 96% of the area of potential physical disturbance of the seabed is attributable to this activity.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017) no threshold is to be specified for D6C1: the status of the D6C1 criterion is therefore not reported. However, the assessment of criterion D6C1 shows that the potential physical losses represent an area of 69 km², i.e. less than 0.1% of the area of the MRU. The potential physical losses are mainly due to marine works (material extraction, coastal works, dredging, dumping).
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Description overall status
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Half of the major benthic habitat types present in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine subregion are potentially disturbed to more than 95% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of the various indicators informing the D6C3.
Potential physical disturbances on the seabed are assessed on the basis of data relating to the anthropogenic activities likely to generate these pressures: coastal development, extraction of marine aggregates, dredging and dumping of dredged material, mooring, aquaculture and professional dragging arts fishing.The potential physical disturbances on the seabed (D6C2) represent an area of 41,163 km² in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region (approximately 46% of the MRU area). Although the use of available data on professional troll fishing increases the actual area under pressure, the assessment shows that almost 96% of the area of potential physical disturbance of the seabed is attributable to this activity. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in terms of the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations needed to assess the various indicators informing the D6C2.
The potential physical losses of the seabed are evaluated on the basis of data relating to human activities likely to generate these pressures: coastal development, extraction of marine aggregates, dredging and dumping of dredged material. The potential physical losses of the seabed (D6C1) represent an area of approximately 69 km² in the southern part of the MRU GdG (i.e. less than 0.1% of the area of the MRU). The reliability of these results is considered to be low insofar as many uncertainties exist from the point of view of the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the evaluation of criterion D6C1.
Assessments period
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
Related pressures
Related targets