Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D2 / France / NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D2 Non-indigenous species
Member State France
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas
Reported by Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire
Report date 2020-02-19
Report access ART8_GES_FR_2020-02-17.xml

SRM MC (ACS-FR-MS-MC)

GES component
D2
D2
D2
D2
D2
D2
D2
Feature
Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
Element
Aoroides longimerus
Asterocarpa humilis
Botrylloides diegensis
Chaetozone corona
Haminoea japonica
Polysiphonia morrowii
Tritia corniculum
Element code
488687
250047
252278
332670
238369
232563
876831
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Criterion
D2C1
D2C1
D2C1
D2C1
D2C1
D2C1
D2C1
Parameter
Presence
Presence
Presence
Presence
Presence
Presence
Presence
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit
(number of) species
(number of) species
(number of) species
(number of) species
(number of) species
(number of) species
(number of) species
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
This parameter consists of a census of new sightings/observations of non-native species over the 6-year period under consideration. Thus, this is the first signalling of this species at the scale of all French coasts (all marine sub-regions combined). (Bibliographic reference: Gouillieux, B., Lavesque, N., Leclerc, J.C., Le Garrec, V., Viard, F., Bachelet, G., 2015. Three non-indigenous species of Aoroides (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Aoroidae) from the French Atlantic coast. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K 96(8) 1651-1659. doi:10.1017/S0025315415002027)Date of first reporting (corresponding scientific publication): 2015.date of first corresponding observation (date of sampling of each new NIS in the field): 2014.no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
This parameter consists of a census of new sightings/observations of non-native species over the 6-year period under consideration. Thus, this is the first signalling of this species at the scale of all French coasts (all marine sub-regions combined). (Bibliographic reference: Bishop, J.D.D., Roby, C., Yunnie, A.L.E., Wood, C.A., Levêque, L., Turon, X., Viard, F., 2013. The Southern hemisphere ascidian Asterocarpa humilis is unrecognised but widely established in NW France and Great Britain. Biol. Invasions. 15: 253-260. DOI 10.1007/s10530-012-0286-x)Date of first reporting (corresponding scientific publication): 2013 Date of first corresponding observation (date of sampling of each new NIS in the field): 2005 No threshold is currently available to assess whether the parameter has been reached.
This parameter consists of a census of new sightings/observations of non-native species over the 6-year period under consideration. Thus, this is the first signalling of this species at the scale of all French coasts (all marine sub-regions combined). (Bibliographic reference: Bishop, J., Wood, C.A., Levêque, L., Yunnie, A.L.E., Viard, F., 2015. Repeated rapid assessment surveys reveal contrasting trends in occupancy of marinas by non-indigenous species on opposite sides of the Western English Channel. Mar. Poll. Bull. 95: 699-706)Date of first reporting (corresponding scientific publication): 2015 Date of first corresponding observation (date of sampling of each new NIS in the field): 2004 No threshold is currently available to assess whether the parameter has been reached or not.
This parameter consists of a census of new sightings/observations of non-native species over the 6-year period under consideration. Thus, this is the first signalling of this species at the scale of all the French coasts (all marine subregions taken together). (Bibliographical reference: Le Garrec, V., Grall, V., Chevalier, C., Guyonnet, B., Jourde, J., Lavesque, N., Bonifácio, P., Blake, J.A., 2016. Chaetozone corona (Polychaeta, Cirratulidae) in the Bay of Biscay: a new alien species for the North-est Atlantic waters? J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 1-3. doi:10.1017/S0025315416000540)Date of first reporting (corresponding scientific publication): 2016.Date of first corresponding observation (date of sampling of each new NIS in the field): 1996.No threshold is currently available to assess whether the parameter has been reached.
This parameter consists of a census of new sightings/observations of non-native species over the 6-year period under consideration. Thus, this species is newly reported in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region, but there is no information on a possible previous record from the French coast. (Bibliographic reference: Hanson, D., Hirano, Y., Valdés, A., 2013a. Population genetics of Haminoea (Haloa) japonica Pilsbry, 1895, a widespread non-indigenous sea slug (Mollusca: Opisthobranchia) in North America and Europe. Biol. Invasions. 15: 395-406. DOI 10.1007/s10530-012-0294-x)Date of first reporting (corresponding scientific publication): 2013 Date of first corresponding observation (date of sampling of each new NIS in the field): <2003 No threshold is currently available to assess whether the parameter has been reached.
This parameter consists of a census of new sightings/observations of non-native species over the 6-year period under consideration. Thus, this species is newly reported in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region, but had previously been reported in the Western Mediterranean marine subregion (Bibliographic reference: Geoffroy, A., Le Gall, L., Destombe, C., 2012. Cryptic introduction of the red algae Polysiphonia morrowii Harvey (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) in the North Atlantic Ocean highlighted by a DNA barcoding approach. Aquatic Botany. 100: 67-71. doi:10.1016/d.aquabot.2012.03.002)Date of first reporting (corresponding scientific publication): 2012.date of first corresponding observation (date of sampling of each new NIS in the field): Unknown.no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
This parameter consists of a census of new sightings/observations of non-native species over the 6-year period under consideration. Thus, this species is newly reported in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region, but had previously been reported in the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region (Bibliographic reference: Gully, F., Cochu, M., Delemarre, J.L., 2013. First observation of the gastropod Nassarius corniculum (Olivi, 1792) in Brittany. An aod - the naturalist notebooks of the Marine Observatory. 2: 26-33)Date of first reporting (corresponding scientific publication): 2013 Date of first corresponding observation (date of sampling of each new NIS in the field): 2013 No threshold is currently available to assess whether the parameter has been reached.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
Due to biases and uncertainties in the available data, it is not currently possible to assess the status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species. However, the fact that several species have been newly and recently introduced shows that measures are needed to limit this risk in the future.
Due to biases and uncertainties in the available data, it is not currently possible to assess the status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species. However, the fact that several species have been newly and recently introduced shows that measures are needed to limit this risk in the future.
Due to biases and uncertainties in the available data, it is not currently possible to assess the status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species. However, the fact that several species have been newly and recently introduced shows that measures are needed to limit this risk in the future.
Due to biases and uncertainties in the available data, it is not currently possible to assess the status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species. However, the fact that several species have been newly and recently introduced shows that measures are needed to limit this risk in the future.
Due to biases and uncertainties in the available data, it is not currently possible to assess the status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species. However, the fact that several species have been newly and recently introduced shows that measures are needed to limit this risk in the future.
Due to biases and uncertainties in the available data, it is not currently possible to assess the status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species. However, the fact that several species have been newly and recently introduced shows that measures are needed to limit this risk in the future.
Due to biases and uncertainties in the available data, it is not currently possible to assess the status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species. However, the fact that several species have been newly and recently introduced shows that measures are needed to limit this risk in the future.
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
The status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species directly informs the status of the element. However, the low confidence in the data used and the absence of a threshold do not allow for a conclusion on the status of criterion D2C1 and thus the element.
The status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species directly informs the status of the element. However, the low confidence in the data used and the absence of a threshold do not allow for a conclusion on the status of criterion D2C1 and thus the element.
The status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species directly informs the status of the element. However, the low confidence in the data used and the absence of a threshold do not allow for a conclusion on the status of criterion D2C1 and thus the element.
The status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species directly informs the status of the element. However, the low confidence in the data used and the absence of a threshold do not allow for a conclusion on the status of criterion D2C1 and thus the element.
The status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species directly informs the status of the element. However, the low confidence in the data used and the absence of a threshold do not allow for a conclusion on the status of criterion D2C1 and thus the element.
The status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species directly informs the status of the element. However, the low confidence in the data used and the absence of a threshold do not allow for a conclusion on the status of criterion D2C1 and thus the element.
The status of criterion D2C1 with respect to this species directly informs the status of the element. However, the low confidence in the data used and the absence of a threshold do not allow for a conclusion on the status of criterion D2C1 and thus the element.
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
No integration rule is necessary, the criterion status directly informs the element status.
No integration rule is necessary, the criterion status directly informs the element status.
No integration rule is necessary, the criterion status directly informs the element status.
No integration rule is necessary, the criterion status directly informs the element status.
No integration rule is necessary, the criterion status directly informs the element status.
No integration rule is necessary, the criterion status directly informs the element status.
No integration rule is necessary, the criterion status directly informs the element status.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
GES extent unit
Number of newly-introduced species
Number of newly-introduced species
Number of newly-introduced species
Number of newly-introduced species
Number of newly-introduced species
Number of newly-introduced species
Number of newly-introduced species
GES achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
Since 2012, a total of 7 new non-native species have been reported in the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. As no threshold defining the "maximum level" of non-native species introduction compatible with GES is currently defined, it is not possible to assess GES achievement under D2C1 for the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. However, the fact that a number of species have been newly and recently introduced demonstrates that measures need to be taken to limit this risk in the future, and the information on criteria D2C2 and D2C3 identified in the literature is too limited to make a meaningful assessment of these two criteria at the sub-regional level.
Since 2012, a total of 7 new non-native species have been reported in the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. As no threshold defining the "maximum level" of non-native species introduction compatible with GES is currently defined, it is not possible to assess GES achievement under D2C1 for the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. However, the fact that a number of species have been newly and recently introduced demonstrates that measures need to be taken to limit this risk in the future, and the information on criteria D2C2 and D2C3 identified in the literature is too limited to make a meaningful assessment of these two criteria at the sub-regional level.
Since 2012, a total of 7 new non-native species have been reported in the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. As no threshold defining the "maximum level" of non-native species introduction compatible with GES is currently defined, it is not possible to assess GES achievement under D2C1 for the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. However, the fact that a number of species have been newly and recently introduced demonstrates that measures need to be taken to limit this risk in the future, and the information on criteria D2C2 and D2C3 identified in the literature is too limited to make a meaningful assessment of these two criteria at the sub-regional level.
Since 2012, a total of 7 new non-native species have been reported in the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. As no threshold defining the "maximum level" of non-native species introduction compatible with GES is currently defined, it is not possible to assess GES achievement under D2C1 for the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. However, the fact that a number of species have been newly and recently introduced demonstrates that measures need to be taken to limit this risk in the future, and the information on criteria D2C2 and D2C3 identified in the literature is too limited to make a meaningful assessment of these two criteria at the sub-regional level.
Since 2012, a total of 7 new non-native species have been reported in the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. As no threshold defining the "maximum level" of non-native species introduction compatible with GES is currently defined, it is not possible to assess GES achievement under D2C1 for the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. However, the fact that a number of species have been newly and recently introduced demonstrates that measures need to be taken to limit this risk in the future, and the information on criteria D2C2 and D2C3 identified in the literature is too limited to make a meaningful assessment of these two criteria at the sub-regional level.
Since 2012, a total of 7 new non-native species have been reported in the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. As no threshold defining the "maximum level" of non-native species introduction compatible with GES is currently defined, it is not possible to assess GES achievement under D2C1 for the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. However, the fact that a number of species have been newly and recently introduced demonstrates that measures need to be taken to limit this risk in the future, and the information on criteria D2C2 and D2C3 identified in the literature is too limited to make a meaningful assessment of these two criteria at the sub-regional level.
Since 2012, a total of 7 new non-native species have been reported in the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. As no threshold defining the "maximum level" of non-native species introduction compatible with GES is currently defined, it is not possible to assess GES achievement under D2C1 for the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region. However, the fact that a number of species have been newly and recently introduced demonstrates that measures need to be taken to limit this risk in the future, and the information on criteria D2C2 and D2C3 identified in the literature is too limited to make a meaningful assessment of these two criteria at the sub-regional level.
Assessments period
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
Related pressures
Related targets