Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D6 / France / NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
Member State | France |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas |
Reported by | Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire |
Report date | 2020-02-19 |
Report access | ART8_GES_FR_2020-02-17.xml |
SRM MC (ACS-FR-MS-MC)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Abyssal |
Circalittoral coarse sediment |
Circalittoral mixed sediment |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Circalittoral sand |
Infralittoral coarse sediment |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Infralittoral sand |
Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef |
Lower bathyal sediment |
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment |
Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment |
Offshore circalittoral mud |
Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Offshore circalittoral sand |
Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef |
Upper bathyal sediment |
||
Element code |
HabBenAbyssal |
HabBenCircalitCoarSed |
HabBenCircalitMxdSed |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitRock |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenInfralitCoarSed |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitRock |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenBathyalLowRock |
HabBenBathyalLowSed |
HabBenOffshCoarSed |
HabBenOffshMxdSed |
HabBenOffshMud |
HabBenOffshRock |
HabBenOffshSand |
HabBenBathyalUpRock |
HabBenBathyalUpSed |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Parameter other |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Threshold value source |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
107.6 |
2798.4 |
3.9 |
84.2 |
565.7 |
294.4 |
267.7 |
2.1 |
56.2 |
344.1 |
577.7 |
351.7 |
21486.0 |
10.1 |
131.8 |
122.0 |
12761.8 |
1961.5 |
42776.0 |
59.8 |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of pressure |
extent in km2 of pressure |
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
Since the extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine subregion has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the area of the marine subregion, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea marine subregion are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "abyssal zone" habitat is 107.6 km², or 32.4% of the total area of habitat in the Celtic Sea marine subregion. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter is being met.
|
Since the extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the marine sub-region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine sub-region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral coarse sediment" habitat is 2798.4 km², representing 94% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Seas marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Since the extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the marine sub-region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral heterogeneous sediment" habitat is 3.9 km², or 31.6% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Since the extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the marine sub-region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "coastal mudflats" habitat is 84.2 km², or 96.3% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Since the extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the marine sub-region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral biogenic rock and reef" habitat is 565.7 km², or 86.3% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Since the extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the marine sub-region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral sands" habitat is 294.4 km² or 88.3% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Since the extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the marine sub-region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "subtidal coarse sediment" habitat is 267.7 km², or 63.5% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Since the extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the marine sub-region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "subtidal heterogeneous sediment" habitat is 2.1 km², or 5.1% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Since the extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the marine sub-region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "subtidal mud" habitat is 56.2 km², or 61.9% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Since the extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the marine sub-region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "subtidal biogenic rock and reef" habitat is 344.1 km², or 54.7% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
To the extent that the extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRS has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "subtidal sands" habitat is 577.7 km², or 85.6% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
To the extent that the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. It has not been possible to fully distinguish rocks and reefs in the lower bathyal from sediments in the lower bathyal. As a result, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "Lower Bathyal Sediment or Lower Bathyal Rocks and Reefs" habitat is 5 km², or 66.5% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
To the extent that the extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRS has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the area of the MRS, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the MRS MC are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude.The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "Lower Bathyal Sediment" habitat is 351.7 km², or 65.9% of the total habitat area in the Bay of Biscay marine sub-region. In addition, it was not possible to fully distinguish between Lower Bathyal Rocks and Reefs and Lower Bathyal Sediments. Therefore, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "Lower Bathyal Sediment or Lower Bathyal Rocks and Reefs" habitat is 74.6 km² or 100% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
To the extent that the extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRS has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral coarse sediment" habitat is 21486 km², or 99.8% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
To the extent that the extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRS has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral mixed sediment" habitat is 10.1 km², or 100% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
To the extent that the extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRS has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the area of the sub-marine region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral mud" habitat is 131.8 km², or 100% of the total area of habitat in the Celtic Sea sub-marine region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
To the extent that the extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRS has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral biogenic rock and reef" habitat is 122 km², or 98.6% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
To the extent that the extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRS has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral sands" habitat is 12761.8 km², or 100% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
To the extent that the extent of potential physical disturbance in this subregion has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the surface area of the subregion, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Seas subregion are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. It has not been possible to fully distinguish between upper bathyal rocks and reefs and upper bathyal sediments. As a result, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef" habitat is 74.6 km², or 100% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Seas subregion. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Since the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing more than 97% of the area of the sub-marine region, it follows that many of the major habitat types present in the Celtic Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "Upper Bathyal Sediment" habitat is 1961.5 km², or 100% of the total area of habitat in the Celtic Sea sub-marine region. In addition, it was not possible to fully distinguish between Upper Bathyal Rocks and Reefs and Upper Bathyal Sediments. Therefore, the two habitats are partially assessed together.The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "Upper bathyal sediment" habitat is 74.6 km² or 100% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
The spatial extent of potential physical disturbance of the seabed represents more than 42,700 km², or more than 97% of the surface area of the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. The results of the assessment show that almost 100% of this potential physical disturbance is attributable to professional dragging arts fishing. Other activities generating potential physical pressure are, in decreasing order of extent: aquaculture, material extraction, moorings and, to a lesser extent, coastal development. These activities, however, represent potential areas of disturbance that are reduced to a few tens of km². The reliability of these results is low insofar as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the evaluation of the various D6C2 indicators. It should also be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Of the 59.8 km² area of potential physical loss of the seabed, i.e. less than 0.2% of the area of the SRM MC, about 57% is related to material extraction and about 43% to coastal development. Activities related to dredging and dumping of dredged material are relatively little present in this sub-marine region, resulting in limited potential physical losses. The reliability of these results is low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators of the D6C1. It should also be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Description criteria |
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "abyssal zone" habitat is 107.6 km², i.e. 32.4% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Seas marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterize the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral coarse sediment" habitat is 2798.4 km², i.e. 94% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral heterogeneous sediment" habitat is 3.9 km², i.e. 31.6% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral mud" habitat is 84.2 km², i.e. 96.3% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 565.7 km², i.e. 86.3% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral sands" habitat is 294.4 km², i.e. 88.3% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "subtidal coarse sediment" habitat is 267.7 km², or 63.5% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "heterogeneous subtidal sediment" habitat is 2.1 km², i.e. 5.1% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral mudflats" habitat is 56.2 km², i.e. 61.9% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "subtidal biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 344.1 km², i.e. 54.7% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "subtidal sands" habitat is 577.7 km², or 85.6% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterize the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. It has not been possible to fully distinguish rocks and reefs of the lower bathyal from sediments of the lower bathyal. Therefore, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "lower bathyal sediments or rocks and reefs" habitat is 5 km², which represents 66.5% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region.The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular due to the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional troll fishing is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the MC MCFN. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "lower bathyal sediment" habitat is 351.7 km², or 65.9% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. In addition, it was not possible to fully distinguish between Lower Bathyal Rocks and Reefs and Lower Bathyal Sediments. Therefore, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "Lower Bathyal Sediment or Lower Bathyal Rocks and Reefs" habitat is 74.6 km², or 100% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterize the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The total spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse circalittoral offshore sediment" habitat is 21,486 km², i.e. 99.8% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral mixed sediment" habitat is 10.1 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral mud" habitat is 131.8 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef" habitat is 122 km², i.e. 98.6% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. The total spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral sands" habitat is 12,761.8 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. It was not possible to fully distinguish between rocks and reefs of the upper bathyal and sediments of the upper bathyal. Therefore, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef" habitat is 74.6 km², i.e. 100 % of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea sub-region, however, the relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "upper bathyal sediment" habitat is 1 961.5 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. In addition, it was not possible to fully distinguish between Upper Bathyal Rocks and Reefs and Upper Bathyal Sediments. Therefore, the two habitats are partially assessed together. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "Upper Bathyal Sediment or Upper Bathyal Rocks and Reefs" habitat is 74.6 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the Celtic Sea marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment are nevertheless to be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017) no threshold is to be specified for D6C2: the status of the D6C2 criterion is therefore not reported. However, the assessment of criterion D6C2 shows that the spatial extent of potential physical disturbance of the seabed is 42 700 km², which is more than 97% of the area of the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-Region. Although the use of available data on professional trolling increases the actual area under pressure, the assessment shows that almost 100% of the area of potential physical disturbance of the seabed is attributable to this activity.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017) no threshold is to be specified for D6C1: the status of the D6C1 criterion is therefore not reported. However, the assessment of the D6C1 criterion shows that the potential physical losses represent an area of 59.8 km², i.e. less than 0.2% of the surface area of the Celtic Marine Sub-Region. The potential physical losses are mainly due to marine works (material extraction, coastal works, dredging, dumping).
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||
Description element |
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Many of the major benthic habitat types present in the Celtic Seas marine subregion (9) are potentially disturbed over 94% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. This includes all offshore circalittoral and upper bathyal habitats represented in the Celtic Seas marine subregion, as well as coastal coarse sediments and circalittoral mud. The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Potential physical disturbance on the seabed is assessed on the basis of data on the anthropogenic activities likely to generate these pressures: coastal development, extraction of marine aggregates, dredging and dumping of dredged material, mooring, aquaculture and professional dragged art fishing.The potential physical disturbance of the seabed (D6C2) represents an area of more than 42,700 km² in the Celtic Sea Marine Sub-region (97% of the area of the marine sub-region). Although the use of available data for professional troll fishing increases the actual area under pressure, the assessment shows that almost 100% of the area of potential physical disturbance of the seabed is attributable to this activity. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, as well as in the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in D6C2.
|
Potential physical losses on the seabed are assessed on the basis of data on the anthropogenic activities likely to generate these pressures: coastal developments, extraction of marine aggregates, dredging and dumping of dredged material. Potential physical losses from the seabed (D6C1) represent an area of 59.8 km² in the Celtic Sea sub-region (i.e. less than 0.2% of the area of the sub-region). The reliability of these results is considered to be low as many uncertainties exist with respect to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required for the assessment of criterion D6C1.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Related targets |