Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D6 / France / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
Member State | France |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire |
Report date | 2020-02-19 |
Report access | ART8_GES_FR_2020-02-17.xml |
Manche mer du Nord (ANS-FR-MS-MMN)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Circalittoral coarse sediment |
Circalittoral mixed sediment |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Circalittoral sand |
Infralittoral coarse sediment |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Infralittoral sand |
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment |
Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment |
Offshore circalittoral mud |
Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Offshore circalittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenCircalitCoarSed |
HabBenCircalitMxdSed |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitRock |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenInfralitCoarSed |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitRock |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenOffshCoarSed |
HabBenOffshMxdSed |
HabBenOffshMud |
HabBenOffshRock |
HabBenOffshSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Parameter other |
|||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
|||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Not available yet
|
Threshold value source |
|||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
|||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
|||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
|||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
5117.4 |
13.3 |
76.1 |
145.0 |
1982.0 |
1061.2 |
1.8 |
137.1 |
224.3 |
918.2 |
17345.0 |
108.0 |
43.3 |
56.7 |
667.4 |
28219.0 |
218.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected |
extent in km2 of pressure |
extent in km2 of pressure |
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, under D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral coarse sediment" habitat is 5117.4 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. Note that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter is being met.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, under D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral mixed sediment" habitat is 13.3 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, under D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral mud" habitat is 76.1 km², i.e. 100% of the total area of habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, under D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 145 km², i.e. 99% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not this parameter is being met.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, under D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region, it follows that all the major habitat types present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral sands" habitat is 1982 km², i.e. 99.9% of the total surface area of habitat in the Channel/North Sea sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter is being met.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse subtidal sediment" habitat is 1061.2 km², i.e. 99.9% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed " mixed sediment infralittoral " habitat is 1.8 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat surface area in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub- region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "infralittoral mud" habitat is 137.1 km², i.e. 99.1% of the total habitat surface area in the Channel/North Sea sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 224.3 km², i.e. 98% of the total habitat surface area in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not this parameter is being met.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "infralittoral sands" habitat is 918.2 km², or 94.7% of the total habitat area in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse circalittoral offshore sediment" habitat is 17345 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. Note that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter is being met.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the marine sub-region, it follows that all the major habitat types present in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral heterogeneous sediment" habitat is 108 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter is being met.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "offshore mud" habitat is 43.3 km², i.e. 100% of the total habitat area in the Channel/North Sea sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 56.7 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Insofar as the extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing more than 99% of the surface area of the sub-marine region, it follows that all the major types of habitat present in the Channel/North Sea sub-marine region are potentially disturbed, with proportions of the same order of magnitude. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral sands" habitat is 667.4 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. Note that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter is being met.
|
The spatial extent of the potential physical disturbance of the seabed represents 28,219 km², i.e. more than 99% of the surface area of the Channel/North Sea subregion. The results of the assessment show that almost 100% of this potential physical disturbance is attributable to commercial trawl fishing. The other activities generating potential physical pressure are, in decreasing order of extent: moorings (approximately 2% of the surface area of the Channel/North Sea sub-region), fishing (approximately 2% of the surface area of the Channel/North Sea sub-region), extraction of marine aggregates (0.5%), and to a lesser extent (<0.15%), dredged material dumping, aquaculture, dredging and coastal development. These activities represent potential areas of disturbance that are reduced to a few tens of km². The reliability of these results is low as many uncertainties exist with regard to the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various D6C2 indicators. It should also be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Of the 218 km² of potential physical loss of the seabed, i.e. less than 0.8% of the surface area of the Channel/North Sea marine subregion, around 71% concerns the extraction of marine aggregates and almost 20% concerns the dumping of dredged material. Activities related to dredging and coastal development are less present in this marine subregion, resulting in limited potential physical losses (respectively 6% and 11% of the area of potential physical loss of the seabed). The reliability of these results is low as many uncertainties exist in terms of the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the different indicators of D6C1. It should also be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
|
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Description criteria |
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse circalittoral coastal sediment" habitat is 5117.4 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral mixed sediment" habitat is 13.3 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly because of the data and the method used to characterise the surfaces subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral mud" habitat is 76.1 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "rocks and coastal circalittoral biogenic reefs" habitat is 145 km², i.e. 99% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the surfaces subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral sands" habitat is 1982 km², i.e. 99.9% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse infralittoral sediment" habitat is 1061.2 km², i.e. 99.9% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the surfaces subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "mixed infralittoral sediment" habitat is 1.8 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral mud" habitat is 137.1 km², i.e. 99.1% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 224.3 km², i.e. 98% of the total habitat area in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral sands" habitat is 918.2 km², i.e. 94.7% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. Dredging activity is also responsible for significant potential physical disturbance to the "coarse circalittoral offshore sediment" habitat, with 14% of the potentially disturbed area attributable to this activity. The total spatial extent of potentially disturbed "coarse circalittoral sediment offshore" habitat is 17345 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "mixed offshore circalittoral sediment" habitat is 108 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral mud" habitat is 43.3 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The surface areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 56.7 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the main types of benthic habitats in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. Dredging activity is also responsible for significant potential physical disturbance to the "offshore circalittoral sands" habitat, with 9% of the potentially disturbed surface area attributable to this activity. The total spatial extent of potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral sands" habitat is 667.4 km², i.e. 100% of the total surface area of habitat in the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging activities.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017) no threshold is to be specified for D6C2: the status of the D6C2 criterion is therefore not reported. However, the assessment of criterion D6C2 shows that the spatial extent of the potential physical disturbance of the seabed represents 28 200 km², i.e. more than 99% of the surface area of the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. Although the use of available data concerning professional trolling increases the area actually under pressure, the assessment shows that practically 100% of the area of potential physical disturbance of the seabed is attributable to this activity.
|
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017) no threshold is to be specified for D6C1: the status of the D6C1 criterion is therefore not reported. However, the assessment of the D6C1 criterion shows that the potential physical losses represent an area of 218 km2 , i.e. less than 0.8% of the surface area of the Channel/North Sea marine sub-region. The potential physical losses are mainly due to maritime works (extraction of materials, coastal works, dredging, dumping).
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||
Description element |
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
|
||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
The majority (85%) of the major types of benthic habitats present in the Channel/North Sea sub-region are potentially disturbed over 99% of their extent (D6C3), mainly due to commercial trawl fishing. Two other activities are responsible for potential physical disturbance for some habitat types: dredging for "coastal circalittoral mixed sediments" and moorings for "offshore circalittoral sands", which account for more than 14% and 8.8% of the potentially disturbed area, respectively. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators informing the D6C3.
|
Potential physical disturbance on the seabed is assessed on the basis of data relating to the anthropogenic activities likely to generate these pressures: coastal development, extraction of marine aggregates, dredging and dumping of dredged material, mooring, aquaculture and professional dragged art fishing. Potential physical disturbance of the seabed (D6C2) represents an area of more than 28 219 km² in the Channel/North Sea sub-region (99.6% of the area of the marine sub-region). Although the use of available data for professional troll fishing increases the actual area under pressure, the assessment shows that almost 100% of the area of potential physical disturbance of the seabed is attributable to this activity. The reliability of these results is considered low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, as well as in the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in D6C2.
|
Potential physical losses on the seabed are assessed on the basis of data on the anthropogenic activities likely to generate these pressures: coastal developments, extraction of marine aggregates, dredging and dumping of dredged material. Potential physical losses from the seabed (D6C1) represent an area of 218 km² in the Channel/North Sea sub-region (i.e. less than 0.8% of the area of the sub-region). The reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, but also in the assumptions and interpretations required to assess criterion D6C1.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|||||||||||||||||
Related targets |