Member State report / Art8 / 2012 / D1-P / Malta / Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2012-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Pelagic habitats |
Member State | Malta |
Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea |
Reported by | Malta Environment and Planning Authority |
Report date | 2013-08-02 |
Report access | MSFD8aFeatures_20131105_121510.xml |
MIC-MT-MS
Topic |
FuncGroupAbundance
|
FuncGroupCondition
|
FuncGroupAbundance
|
FuncGroupCondition
|
FuncGroupOverall
|
FuncGroupAbundance
|
FuncGroupCondition
|
FuncGroupAbundance
|
FuncGroupCondition
|
FuncGroupOverall
|
FuncGroupAbundance
|
FuncGroupCondition
|
FuncGroupOverall
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reporting Feature |
Offshore pelagic-feeding birds |
Offshore pelagic-feeding birds |
Turtles |
Turtles |
Turtles |
Mammals |
Mammals |
Demersal elasmobranchs |
Demersal elasmobranchs |
Demersal elasmobranchs |
Demersal fish |
Demersal fish |
Demersal fish |
Indicator |
GESOther |
GESOther |
1.6.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.6.1 |
||||||
Threshold Value |
Species composition is in line with the composition of marine reptiles in the Mediterranean region |
Species composition is in line with the composition of marine reptiles in the Mediterranean region |
Good status: Species composition in Malta reflects species composition at a regional level. |
Species composition in annual samples is stable
|
Species composition in annual samples is stable
|
||||||||
Threshold Unit |
|||||||||||||
Threshold Proportion |
|||||||||||||
Baseline |
Historic records
|
Historic records
|
Records of cetaceans in Malta since 1960
|
MEDITS data for the period 2007-2012
|
MEDITS data for the period 2005-2012
|
||||||||
Status |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
Good |
Good |
NotAssessed |
Good |
NotAssessed |
Good |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
Good |
NotAssessed |
Status Description |
In view of current limitations in available data
|
In view of current limitations in available data
|
Given that a single species is representing this functional group, status in terms of relative abundance is not deemed relevant. On the other hand, reference is being made to the assessment of characteristics for Caretta caretta |
Due to limited abundance estimates as well as lack of reference conditions |
Due to limited knowledge on ecosystem functions to which the outcome of the analysis of relative biomass can be related |
Since the assessment of this functional group should be undertaken in relation to ecosystem functions, which due to current data limitations, could not be udertaken at this stage |
Due to limited knowledge on ecosystem functions to which the outcome of the analysis of relative biomass can be related |
Since the assessment of this functional group should be undertaken in relation to ecosystem functions, which due to current data limitations, could not be udertaken at this stage |
|||||
Status Trend |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Stable |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Stable |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Stable |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Status Confidence |
Moderate |
Low |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Low |
||||||||
Topic |
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatDistribution
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatOverall
|
|||||||||
Reporting Feature |
Seagrass habitat (predominantly Posidonia oceanica meadows) |
Seagrass habitat (predominantly Posidonia oceanica meadows) |
Seagrass habitat (predominantly Posidonia oceanica meadows) |
Seagrass habitat (predominantly Posidonia oceanica meadows) |
|||||||||
Indicator |
1.6.1 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
||||||||||
Threshold Value |
Ecological Quality Ratio based on the PREI index >0.6 |
No significant changes in distirbutional range for the past ten years |
Changes to the extent of P. oceanica meadows due to anthropogenic disturbance are estimated at less than 10% of the current extent. |
All criteria assessed are indicative of good status; None of the criteria are indicative of poor status. |
|||||||||
Threshold Unit |
Ratio
|
Trend
|
Percentage
|
Ratio
|
|||||||||
Threshold Proportion |
|||||||||||||
Baseline |
Reference conditions identified through the WFD 2012 monitoring |
Distributional range of P. oceanica as indicated by the 2002 baseline survey and supplemented by more recent localised data (as aggregated for the purposes of the MSFD). |
Extent of P. oceanica as compiled in 2002 baseline survey and supplemented by more recent localised data (as aggregated for the purposes of the MSFD). |
Distributional range and extent based on 2002 survey as supplemented by more recent localised data, and reference conditions as identified through 2012 WFD monitoring. |
|||||||||
Status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
|||||||||
Status Description |
|||||||||||||
Status Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
|||||||||
Status Confidence |
High |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |