MS/Art8/2018/D3/Portugal/NE Atlantic: Macaronesia — Marine Information System for Europe

Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Portugal / NE Atlantic: Macaronesia

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due	2018-10-15
GES Descriptor	D3 Commercial fish and shellfish
Member State	Portugal
Region/subregion	NE Atlantic: Macaronesia
Reported by	DGRM
Report date	2021-03-03
Report access	ART8_GES_PT_setembro2020.xml

Azores Subdivision (AMA-PT-SD-AZO)

Simplified table

GES component	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3
Feature	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element	Alopias spp	Aphanopus carbo	Aphanopus carbo	Aphanopus carbo	Argentina silus	Argentina silus	Balistes capriscus	Balistes capriscus	Beryx decadactylus	Beryx decadactylus	Beryx decadactylus	Beryx splendens	Beryx splendens	Beryx splendens	Centrophorus squamosus	Centrophorus squamosus	Centroscymnus coelolepis	Centroscymnus coelolepis	Conger conger	Conger conger	Conger conger	Dalatias licha	Dalatias licha	Diplodus sargus	Diplodus sargus	Epinephelus marginatus	Galeorhinus galeus	Helicolenus dactylopterus	Helicolenus dactylopterus	Helicolenus dactylopterus	Istiophorus albicans	Istiophorus albicans	Isurus oxyrinchus	Isurus oxyrinchus	Kajikia albida	Kajikia albida	Katsuwonus pelamis	Lamna nasus	Lepidopus caudatus	Lepidopus caudatus	Lepidopus caudatus	Loligo forbesii	Makaira nigrican	Makaira nigrican	Molva macrophthalma	Molva macrophthalma	Mora moro	Mora moro	Mora moro	Mullus surmuletus	Mullus surmuletus	Muraena helena	Muraena helena	Mycteroperca fusca	Mycteroperca fusca	Pagellus acarne	Pagellus acarne	Pagellus bogaraveo	Pagellus bogaraveo	Pagellus bogaraveo	Pagrus pagrus	Pagrus pagrus	Pagrus pagrus	Palinurus elephas	Patella ulyssiponensis	Phycis blennoides	Phycis blennoides	Phycis phycis	Phycis phycis	Phycis phycis	Polyprion americanus	Polyprion americanus	Polyprion americanus	Pomatomus saltatrix	Pomatomus saltatrix	Pomatomus saltatrix	Pontinus khulii	Pontinus khulii	Pontinus khulii	Prionace glauca	Prionace glauca	Pseudocaranx dentex	Raja clavata	Raja clavata	Raja clavata	Sarda sarda	Sarda sarda	Sardina pilchardus	Sardina pilchardus	Schedophilus ovalis	Schedophilus ovalis	Scomber colias	Scomber colias	Scomber colias	Scorpaena scrofa	Scorpaena scrofa	Scyllarides latus	Seriola Dumerili	Sparisoma cretense	Sparisoma cretense	Sphyraena viridensis	Sphyraena viridensis	Thunnus alalunga	Thunnus alalunga	Thunnus albacares	Thunnus albacares	Thunnus obesus	Thunnus obesus	Thunnus thynnus	Thunnus thynnus	Trachurus picturatus	Trachurus picturatus	Trachurus picturatus	Xiphias gladius	Xiphias gladius
Element code	105740	127085	127085	127085	126715	126715	154721	154721	126394	126394	126394	126395	126395	126395	105901	105901	105907	105907	126285	126285	126285	105910	105910	127053	127053	127036	105820	127251	127251	127251	126949	126949	105839	105839	712906	712906	127018	105841	127088	127088	127088	140270	126950	126950	126460	126460	126497	126497	126497	126986	126986	126303	126303	127038	127038	127057	127057	127059	127059	127059	127063	127063	127063	107703	140684	126501	126501	126502	126502	126502	126998	126998	126998	151482	151482	151482	183360	183360	183360	105801	105801	126812	105883	105883	105883	127021	127021	126421	126421	126834	126834	151174	151174	151174	127248	127248	107708	126816	231441	231441	127069	127069	127026	127026	127027	127027	127028	127028	127029	127029	126821	126821	126821	127094	127094
Element code source	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2	Straight shark in the subdivision of the Azores	Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) in subareas 1, 2, 4–8, 10, and 14, and divisions 3.a, 9.a, and 12.b (Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean)	Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) in subareas 1, 2, 4–8, 10, and 14, and divisions 3.a, 9.a, and 12.b (Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean)	Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) in subareas 1, 2, 4–8, 10, and 14, and divisions 3.a, 9.a, and 12.b (Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean)	Argentina seabream in the subdivision of the Azores	Argentina seabream in the subdivision of the Azores	Redfish in the subdivision of the Azores	Redfish in the subdivision of the Azores	Emperor in the subdivision of the Azores	Emperor in the subdivision of the Azores	Emperor in the subdivision of the Azores	Alfonyes in the NE Atlantic	Alfonyes in the NE Atlantic	Alfonyes in the NE Atlantic	Silla/Xara in the NE Atlantic	Silla/Xara in the NE Atlantic	Xara black black na Atzine NE	Xara black black na Atzine NE	Azores subdivision	Azores subdivision	Azores subdivision	NE Atlantic gulper	NE Atlantic gulper	Seabream in the subdivision of the Azores	Seabream in the subdivision of the Azores	Simply in the subdivision of the Azores	NE Atlantic	Black harbour porpoise in the subdivision of the Azores	Black harbour porpoise in the subdivision of the Azores	Black harbour porpoise in the subdivision of the Azores	Atlantic sailfish	Atlantic sailfish	Shortfin mako sharks in the North Atlantic	Shortfin mako sharks in the North Atlantic	White marlin in the Atlantic	White marlin in the Atlantic	Bonito in the subdivision of the Azores	Sarona shark in the zone of the Azores	White scabbardfish in the subdivision of the Azores	White scabbardfish in the subdivision of the Azores	White scabbardfish in the subdivision of the Azores	Lula in the subdivision of the Azores	Atlantic blue marlin	Atlantic blue marlin	Azorean hake in the subdivision of the Azores	Azorean hake in the subdivision of the Azores	Melga in the subdivision of the Azores	Melga in the subdivision of the Azores	Melga in the subdivision of the Azores	Red mullet in the subdivision of the Azores	Red mullet in the subdivision of the Azores	Morequote in the subdivision of the Azores	Morequote in the subdivision of the Azores	Agaroupa/Whiting in the subdivision of the Azores	Agaroupa/Whiting in the subdivision of the Azores	Azores subdivision	Azores subdivision	Atlantic red seabream in the Atlantic NE	Atlantic red seabream in the Atlantic NE	Atlantic red seabream in the Atlantic NE	Azores subdivision	Azores subdivision	Azores subdivision	Lobster in the subdivision of the Azores	Lad-brava in the subdivision of the Azores	Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in subareas 1–10, 12, and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in subareas 1–10, 12, and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Forkbeards in the subdivision of the Azores	Forkbeards in the subdivision of the Azores	Forkbeards in the subdivision of the Azores	Wreckage in the subdivision of the Azores	Wreckage in the subdivision of the Azores	Wreckage in the subdivision of the Azores	Anchovy in the subdivision of the Azores	Anchovy in the subdivision of the Azores	Anchovy in the subdivision of the Azores	Baggage in the subdivision of the Azores	Baggage in the subdivision of the Azores	Baggage in the subdivision of the Azores	ENI-North Atlantic	ENI-North Atlantic	Enbill in the subdivision of the Azores	Atlantic skate	Atlantic skate	Atlantic skate	In the subdivision of the Azores	In the subdivision of the Azores	Sardine/pectinga in the subdivision of the Azores	Sardine/pectinga in the subdivision of the Azores	Poplar in the subdivision of the Azores	Poplar in the subdivision of the Azores	Mackerel in the subdivision of the Azores	Mackerel in the subdivision of the Azores	Mackerel in the subdivision of the Azores	Rocz in the subdivision of the Azores	Rocz in the subdivision of the Azores	Cavaco in the subdivision of the Azores	River in the subdivision of the Azores	See the subdivision of the Azores	See the subdivision of the Azores	Bicuda the subdivision of the Azores	Bicuda the subdivision of the Azores	North Atlantic albacore	North Atlantic albacore	Yellowfin tuna in the Atlantic	Yellowfin tuna in the Atlantic	Atlantic bigeye tuna	Atlantic bigeye tuna	Eastern bluefin tuna and Mediterranean	Eastern bluefin tuna and Mediterranean	Blue jack mackerel in the NE Atlantic	Blue jack mackerel in the NE Atlantic	Blue jack mackerel in the NE Atlantic	North Atlantic swordfish	North Atlantic swordfish
Element 2 code	AMA_PT_AZO_THR	bsf.27.nea	bsf.27.nea	bsf.27.nea	aru.27.6b7-10.12	aru.27.6b7-10.12	AMA_PT_AZO_TRG	AMA_PT_AZO_TRG	AMA_PT_AZO_BXD	AMA_PT_AZO_BXD	AMA_PT_AZO_BXD	alf.27.nea	alf.27.nea	alf.27.nea	guq.27.nea	guq.27.nea	cyo.27.nea	cyo.27.nea	AMA_PT_AZO_COE	AMA_PT_AZO_COE	AMA_PT_AZO_COE	sck.27.nea	sck.27.nea	AMA_PT_AZO_SWA	AMA_PT_AZO_SWA	AMA_PT_AZO_GPD	gag.27.nea	AMA_PT_AZO_BRF	AMA_PT_AZO_BRF	AMA_PT_AZO_BRF	SAI-E	SAI-E	SMA-N	SMA-N	WHM-A	WHM-A	AMA_PT_AZO_SKJ	AMA_PT_AZO_POR	AMA_AZO_PT_SFS	AMA_AZO_PT_SFS	AMA_AZO_PT_SFS	sqf.27.10.a.2	BUM-A	BUM-A	AMA_PT_AZO_SLI	AMA_PT_AZO_SLI	AMA_PT_AZO_RIB	AMA_PT_AZO_RIB	AMA_PT_AZO_RIB	AMA_PT_AZO_MUR	AMA_PT_AZO_MUR	AMA_PT_AZO_MMH	AMA_PT_AZO_MMH	AMA_PT_AZO_MKF	AMA_PT_AZO_MKF	AMA_PT_AZO_SBA	AMA_PT_AZO_SBA	sbr.27.10.a.2	sbr.27.10.a.2	sbr.27.10.a.2	AMA_PT_AZO_RPG	AMA_PT_AZO_RPG	AMA_PT_AZO_RPG	AMA_PT_AZO_SLO	AMA_PT_AZO_QTV	gfb.27.nea	gfb.27.nea	AMA_PT_AZO_FOR	AMA_PT_AZO_FOR	AMA_PT_AZO_FOR	AMA_PT_AZO_WRF	AMA_PT_AZO_WRF	AMA_PT_AZO_WRF	AMA_PT_AZO_BLU	AMA_PT_AZO_BLU	AMA_PT_AZO_BLU	AMA_PT_AZO_POI	AMA_PT_AZO_POI	AMA_PT_AZO_POI	BSH-N	BSH-N	AMA_PT_AZO_TRZ	rjc.27.1012	rjc.27.1012	rjc.27.1012	AMA_PT_AZO_BOM	AMA_PT_AZO_BOM	AMA_PT_AZO_PIL	AMA_PT_AZO_PIL	AMA_PT_AZO_HDV	AMA_PT_AZO_HDV	AMA_PT_AZO_MAS	AMA_PT_AZO_MAS	AMA_PT_AZO_MAS	AMA_PT_AZO_SER	AMA_PT_AZO_SER	AMA_PT_AZO_YLL	AMA_PT_AZO_AMB	AMA_PT_AZO_PRR	AMA_PT_AZO_PRR	AMA_PT_AZO_BVV	AMA_PT_AZO_BVV	ALB-N	ALB-N	YFT-A	YFT-A	BET	BET	BFT-E	BFT-E	jaa.27.10.a.2	jaa.27.10.a.2	jaa.27.10.a.2	SWO-N	SWO-N
Element 2 code source	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	ICES	ICES	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	ICES	ICES	ICES	ICES	ICES	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	ICES	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Undefined	Undefined	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	ICES	ICES	ICES	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Undefined	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	ICES	ICES	ICES	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element source	MS in (sub)region	National	National	National	National	National	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	ICES	ICES	ICES	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	National	National	National	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	ICES	ICES	ICES	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	National	National	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	National	National	National	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	National	National	National	National	National	MS in (sub)region	National	National	National	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	National	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Criterion		D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2			D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2			D3C1	D3C2	D3C3		D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3			D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2		D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2			D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2
Parameter		Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	Other	Other	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	Other	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Other	Other	Other	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB			Other	Other	Other	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB			Other		Other		Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB			Other	Other	Other	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other			Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	Other		Other	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB		Other	Other	Other	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Other	Other	Other	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB			Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB			Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB			Other	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB
Parameter other			historical trend of spawning biomass	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)		Biomass level trends			mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)	historical trend of the spawning biomass index	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)	mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)	historical trend of the spawning biomass index	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)					mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)	historical trend of the spawning biomass index	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)							mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)	Spawning Biomass Index	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)									mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)		95th percentile of length distribution (L95)						mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)	historical trend of the spawning biomass index	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)									mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)	historical trend of spawning biomass	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)	mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)	historical trend of the spawning biomass index	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)					mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)	spawning Biomass Index	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)	mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)	historical trend of the spawning biomass index	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)				mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)		95th percentile of length distribution (L95)				Mining fee (catch ratio/biomass index)	Spawning Biomass Index	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)							mining fee (catch/indicator ratio)	historical trend of the spawning biomass index	95th percentile of length distribution (L95)																			95th percentile of length distribution (L95)
Threshold value upper																															1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0							1.0	1.0																																				1.0	1.0																						1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0				1.0	1.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source																															International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas							International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas																																				International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas																						International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas		Other (specify)	Other (specify)	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas					International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
Threshold value source other																																																																																																											ICCAT	ICCAT
Value achieved upper																															2.85	0.7	4.38	0.95	0.72	0.322							1.63	0.67																																				0.75	3.45																						0.54	1.36	0.77	0.95	1.28	0.67	0.339					0.78	1.04
Value achieved lower																															0.33	0.22	1.93	0.57																																														0.4	1.35
Value unit																															Other	Other	Other	Other																																														Other	Other
Value unit other																															coefficient	coefficient	coefficient	coefficient																																														coefficient	coefficient
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend		Stable	Deteriorating	Unknown	Deteriorating	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Stable	Stable	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable			Unknown		Unknown		Deteriorating	Stable			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Stable	Stable		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown	Unknown			Stable	Improving	Stable	Stable	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Unknown			Unknown	Stable	Improving
Parameter achieved		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	No	No	No	Yes	No			Unknown		Unknown		No	No			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Yes	Yes		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed			Not assessed	Not assessed			Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	Unknown			Unknown	Yes	Yes
Description parameter		Species reported on the basis of ICES recommendations.	For D3C2, the historical trend of the spawning biomass index is analysed using data from the ARQDAASE. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015). As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	Species reported on the basis of ICES recommendations.	Species reported on the basis of ICES recommendations.			As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C2, the historical trend of the spawning biomass index is analysed using data from the ARQDAASE. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015). As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C2, the historical trend of the spawning biomass index is analysed using data from the ARQDAASE. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015). As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m					As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C2, the historical trend of the spawning biomass index is analysed using data from the ARQDAASE. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015). As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m							As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	As there are no validated analytical assessments making it possible to calculate the spawning biomass values for the species assessed under the ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea) for this criterion, the historical trend in the spawning biomass index calculated from data in the ARQDAACE was analysed. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015).	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >			As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m		For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m		For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >			As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C2, the historical trend of the spawning biomass index is analysed using data from the ARQDAASE. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015). As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m									As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C2, the historical trend of the spawning biomass index is analysed using data from the ARQDAASE. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015). As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C2, the historical trend of the spawning biomass index is analysed using data from the ARQDAASE. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015). As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m					As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C2, the historical trend of the spawning biomass index is analysed using data from the ARQDAASE. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015). As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C2, the historical trend of the spawning biomass index is analysed using data from the ARQDAASE. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015). As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m				As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m		For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >		As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	As there are no validated analytical assessments making it possible to calculate the spawning biomass values for the species assessed under the ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea) for this criterion, the historical trend in the spawning biomass index calculated from data in the ARQDAACE was analysed. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015). As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used. However, as this method of assessment is not considered appropriate by the ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea), these results have not been taken into account in order to assess the good environmental status of this stock in the subdivision of the Azores. For further details please refer to section D.3.6 Determination and Evaluation of the GES update of the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.							As there are no validated analytical assessments to calculate the figures on fishing mortality for species assessed under ICES, the exploitation rate (catch/indicator ratio) was used as an alternative method. The catch figures were based on the data collected under the National Data Collection Programme (PNRD) which allowed biomass indexes and abundance indices (RPN Biomass) to be estimated on the basis of data from the annual demersal surveys of the PDO/UTA. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C2, the historical trend of the spawning biomass index is analysed using data from the ARQDAASE. For the calculation of this index they have been considered as mature individuals equal to or longer in length for the combination length (Lm), reported by Silva (2015). As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m									F/FMSY	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	The values obtained for yellowfin tuna are within the reference values. For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	F/FMSY	The values obtained for bigeye tuna are not within the reference values. For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	B/BMSY	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value achieved < 1	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >			For D3C3, the 95th percentile of the length distribution (L95) was used from data obtained in the ARQDAASE. As a method of analysis of the trends of the calculated parameters, the comparison of the recent average with the average and historical standard deviation of these indicators was used, using the words: m	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >
Related indicator		bsf.27.nea	sbr.27.10.a2	sbr.27.10.a2	Greater silver smelt (Argentina silus) in Subareas 7â10 and 12, and Division 6.b (other areas)	Greater silver smelt (Argentina silus) in Subareas 7â10 and 12, and Division 6.b (other areas)	AMA_PT_AZO_TRG	AMA_PT_AZO_TRG	AMA_PT_AZO_BXD	AMA_PT_AZO_BXD	AMA_PT_AZO_BXD	Alfonsinos/Golden eye perch (Beryx spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic	Alfonsinos/Golden eye perch (Beryx spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic	Alfonsinos/Golden eye perch (Beryx spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic	Leafscale gulper shark (Centrophorus squamosus) in subareas 1–10, 12, and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Leafscale gulper shark (Centrophorus squamosus) in subareas 1–10, 12, and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Portuguese dogfish (Centroscymnus coelolepis, Centrophorus squamosus) in subareas 1–10, 12, and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Portuguese dogfish (Centroscymnus coelolepis, Centrophorus squamosus) in subareas 1–10, 12, and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Conger conger	Conger conger	Conger conger	sck.27.nea	sck.27.nea	Diplodus sargus	Diplodus sargus			Helicolenus spp.	Helicolenus spp.	Helicolenus spp.	Sailfish (Istiophorus albicans) in the Atlantic East	Sailfish (Istiophorus albicans) in the Atlantic East	Shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchius) in the North Atlantic	Shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchius) in the North Atlantic	White Marlin (Kajikia albida) in the Atlantic	White Marlin (Kajikia albida) in the Atlantic			Lepidopus caudatus		Lepidopus caudatus		Blue Marlin (Makaira nigrican) in the Atlantic	Blue Marlin (Makaira nigrican) in the Atlantic			Saithe	Saithe	Saithe	Mullus surmuletus	Mullus surmuletus	AMA_PT_AZO_MMH	AMA_PT_AZO_MMH	AMA_PT_AZO_MKF	AMA_PT_AZO_MKF	AMA_PT_AZO_SBA	AMA_PT_AZO_SBA	sbr.27.10.a2	sbr.27.10.a2	sbr.27.10.a2	Pagrus pagrus	Pagrus pagrus	Pagrus pagrus			Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in subareas 1–10, 12, and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in subareas 1–10, 12, and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Phycis phycis	Phycis phycis	AMA_PTT_AZO_FOR	Polyprion americanus	Polyprion americanus	Polyprion americanus	AMA_PT_AZO_BLU	AMA_PT_AZO_BLU	AMA_PT_AZO_BLU	Pontinus Khulii		Pontinus Khulii	ICCAT_BSH_N	Blue Shark (Prionace glauca) in the North Atlantic		rjc.27.1012	rjc.27.1012	rjc.27.1012	Sarda sarda	Sarda sarda	Sardina pilchardus	Sardina pilchardus	AMA_PT_AZO_HDV	AMA_PT_AZO_HDV	AMA_PT_AZO_MAS	AMA_PT_AZO_MAS	AMA_PT_AZO_MAS	Scorpaena scrofa	Scorpaena scrofa			Sparisoma cretense	Sparisoma cretense			Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) in the North Atlantic	Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) in the North Atlantic	ICCAT_YFT_N	ICCAT_YFT-N	Bigeye Tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the Atlantic	Bigeye Tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the Atlantic	Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) in the Atlantic East and Mediterranean	Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) in the Atlantic East and Mediterranean				Swordfish Atl. (Xiphias gladius) in the North Atlantic	Swordfish Atl. (Xiphias gladius) in the North Atlantic
Criteria status		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good			Unknown	Not assessed	Unknown		Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Unknown	Good	Good		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Good	Good
Description criteria		Data-limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.					Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data-limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.					Data-limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.							Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.				For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.					Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.						Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.									Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data-limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.					Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.				Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.				For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 Determination and Evaluation of the GES update of the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.							Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.																			Data limited use of data. For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.
Element status	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good
Description element	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	The stock assessed in the framework of ICCAT (International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas) For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	The stock assessed in the framework of ICCAT (International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas) For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For more details on the stock valuation of this species, please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	For more details on the stock valuation of this species, please refer to the Environmental Status Update Report for the 1th Cycle of the MSFD for the subdivision of the Azores.	It was considered that the stock of this species (subject to periodic analytical assessment under ICCAT) did not reach GES for the subdivision of the Azores once only 1 of the assessed criteria reached GES. For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	It was considered that the stock of this species (subject to periodic analytical assessment under ICCAT) did not reach GES for the subdivision of the Azores once only 1 of the assessed criteria reached GES. For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	It was considered that the stock of this species (subject to periodic analytical assessment under ICCAT) did not reach GES for the subdivision of the Azores, as the 2 evaluated criteria did not reach GES. For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	It was considered that the stock of this species (subject to periodic analytical assessment under ICCAT) did not reach GES for the subdivision of the Azores, as the 2 evaluated criteria did not reach GES. For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	The stock of this species (subject to periodic analytical assessment under ICCAT) has been considered to have GES unknown in the subdivision of the Azores as there are only data for the assessment of D3C1. For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	The stock of this species (subject to periodic analytical assessment under ICCAT) has been considered to have GES unknown in the subdivision of the Azores as there are only data for the assessment of D3C1. For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section the report on the update of the environmental status of the 1th EAP for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.	For further details please refer to section D.3.6 of the 1th EAP update report for the subdivision of the Azores.
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band	The classification used to determine the GES for the stocks with the validated analytical assessments and known biological points (13 species) was based on the integration of the assessment to the values of D3C1 and D3C2.The integration method for this species group was OOAO. Thus, the overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both D3C1 and D3C2 are within the reference band
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description overall status	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.	Once for 64% of the stocks considered in Descriptor 3 in this MSFD assessment cycle for the Azores subdivision, there is insufficient data and / or the assessment methods are not validated to be able to assess your GES and thus your GES is unknown , the final GES for Descriptor 3 was considered to be unknown. For more details, please consult section D.1.6 of the report of the 1st MSFD evaluation cycle for the Azores subdivision.
Assessments period	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018	2013-2018
Related pressures	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4	D3-AZO-M1 D3-AZO-M2 D3-AZO-M3 D3-AZO-M4

Madeira subdivision (AMA-PT-SD-MAD)

Simplified table

GES component	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3
Feature	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element	Istiophorus albicans	Istiophorus albicans	Isurus oxyrinchus	Isurus oxyrinchus	Kajikia albida	Kajikia albida	Katsuwonus pelamis	Katsuwonus pelamis	Makaira nigrican	Makaira nigrican	Patella candei	Patella candei	Patella ulyssiponensis	Patella ulyssiponensis	Phorcus sauciatus	Phorcus sauciatus	Prionace glauca	Prionace glauca	Scomber colias	Scomber colias	Thunnus alalunga	Thunnus alalunga	Thunnus albacares	Thunnus albacares	Thunnus obesus	Thunnus obesus	Thunnus thynnus	Thunnus thynnus	Trachurus picturatus	Trachurus picturatus	Xiphias gladius	Xiphias gladius
Element code	126949	126949	105839	105839	712906	712906	127018	127018	126950	126950	140678	140678	140684	140684	689178	689178	105801	105801	151174	151174	127026	127026	127027	127027	127028	127028	127029	127029	126821	126821	127094	127094
Element code source	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2	Atlantic ? Atlantic	Atlantic ? Atlantic	Shortfin mako * (marracho)	Shortfin mako * (marracho)	White marlin	White marlin	Skipjack	Skipjack	Blue marlin	Blue marlin	Longa black Lapa	Longa black Lapa	Lapa white	Lapa white	Winkle	Winkle	Blue shark	Blue shark	Atlantic baskerel	Atlantic baskerel	Albacore	Albacore	Yellowfin tuna	Yellowfin tuna	Bigeye	Bigeye	Bluefin tuna	Bluefin tuna	JAA	JAA	Swordfish	Swordfish
Element 2 code	SAI-ICCAT	SAI-ICCAT	SMA-ICCAT	SMA-ICCAT	ICCAT - WHM	ICCAT - WHM	SKJ-ICCAT	SKJ-ICCAT	ICCAT - BUM	ICCAT - BUM	LPZ	LPZ	LQY	LQY	QAW	QAW	BSH - ICCAT	BSH - ICCAT	MAS	MAS	ICCAT - ALB-N	ICCAT - ALB-N	YFT	YFT	BET	BET	ICCAT - BFT-E	ICCAT - BFT-E			ICCAT - SWO-N	ICCAT - SWO-N
Element 2 code source	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant			Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element source	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	Other	Other	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region	MS in (sub)region
Criterion	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C3	D3C1	D3C3	D3C1	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C2	D3C1	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2
Parameter	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	Size distribution	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	Size distribution	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	Size distribution	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	Size distribution	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB
Parameter other
Threshold value upper	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0		1.0		1.0		1.0	1.0	1.0		1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0		1.0	1.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	Other (specify)		Other (specify)		Other (specify)		International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	Other (specify)		International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	Other (specify)		International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
Threshold value source other											Regional		Regional		Regional				Regional										Regional
Value achieved upper	2.85	0.22	4.38	0.57	0.72	0.72	0.9	1.1	1.63	0.67	1.58		0.79		0.53		0.75	1.35	3.05		0.54	1.36	0.77	0.95	1.28	0.67	0.103		3.28		0.78	1.04
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	No	No	No	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	No	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	Unknown	No	Unknown	Yes	Yes
Description parameter	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <		For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <		For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <		For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <		For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >		For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <		For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <	For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >
Related indicator	Sailfish (Istiophorus albicans) in the Atlantic East	Sailfish (Istiophorus albicans) in the Atlantic East	Shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchius) in the North Atlantic	Shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchius) in the North Atlantic	White Marlin (Kajikia albida) in the Atlantic	White Marlin (Kajikia albida) in the Atlantic	Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the Atlantic East	Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the Atlantic East	Blue Marlin (Makaira nigrican) in the Atlantic	Blue Marlin (Makaira nigrican) in the Atlantic	AMA-PT-MAD_LPZ	AMA-PT-MAD_LPZ	AMA-PT-MAD_LQY	AMA-PT-MAD_LQY	AMA-PT-MAD_QAW	AMA-PT-MAD_QAW	Blue Shark (Prionace glauca) in the North Atlantic	Blue Shark (Prionace glauca) in the North Atlantic	AMA-PT-MAD_MAS	AMA-PT-MAD_MAS	Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) in the North Atlantic	Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) in the North Atlantic	Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the Atlantic	Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the Atlantic	Bigeye Tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the Atlantic	Bigeye Tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the Atlantic	Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) in the Atlantic East and Mediterranean	Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) in the Atlantic East and Mediterranean	AMA-PT-MAD_JAA	AMA-PT-MAD_JAA	Swordfish Atl. (Xiphias gladius) in the North Atlantic	Swordfish Atl. (Xiphias gladius) in the North Atlantic
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not assessed	Good	Not assessed	Good	Not assessed	Good	Good	Not good	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Unknown	Not good	Not assessed	Good	Good
Description criteria
Element status	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Good	Good	Not assessed	Not assessed	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Good	Good
Description element																											ICCAT stock with international assessment	ICCAT stock with international assessment
Integration rule type parameter	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.	In order to achieve good environmental status, all criteria should be at the specified levels in relation to the established limit values. The degree of integration between the 3 criteria is the stock. Since D3C3 is not operational for stocks with quantitative analytical assessment (group (a)), the ICES recommendations (ICES, 2016b) have been followed. ICES, 2017b) and this criterion was not considered in integration for the assessment of good environmental status of stocks. The classification of each BEA stock was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status
GES achieved	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed
Description overall status	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only	Vasconcelos et al., 2018) in the mackerel, blue jack mackerel, white lama, black mud and Caramujo, but not validated by international organisations. Only indicative information has been included for group (b) by comparing long and short historical series of long and short historical series of LPEU and L95, including the above mentioned species, with local numerical assessment and black scabbardfish. It is envisaged that the implementation of these methodologies will be improved and optimised as such. Preparation for next MSFD assessment cycle. Consequently, the assessment of Good Environmental Status in the next cycle should cover more resources exploited by fishing, although those assessed in this cycle Are already representative for more than 50 % of the annual fish landings in Region. The development of a methodology is also considered Standardised at national level providing an instrument for validation of Assessment of stocks of local or national significance, being units Relatively isolated and exploited by local fleets only
Assessments period	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018	2014-2018
Related pressures	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Contaminants - in seafood Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets