Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-F / Black Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Fish |
Region/subregion | Black Sea |
Reported by | Member state |
Member state | Bulgaria |
Romania |
|
---|---|---|---|
Member state report | |||
Marine reporting units | MRUs used |
|
|
Features | Species |
|
|
Element | Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
|
|
Acipenser stellatus |
|
||
Arnoglossus kessleri |
|
||
Dasyatis pastinaca |
|
||
Diplodus annularis |
|
||
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
|
||
Gobius cobitis |
|
||
Gobius niger |
|
||
Gobius paganellus |
|
||
Hippocampus guttulatus |
|
||
Merlangius merlangus |
|
|
|
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
|
||
Neogobius melanostomus |
|
|
|
Oblada melanura |
|
||
Ophidion rochei |
|
||
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
|
||
Pegusa lascaris |
|
||
Platichthys flesus |
|
||
Ponticola cephalargoides |
|
||
Sciaena umbra |
|
||
Scorpaena porcus |
|
||
Spicara smaris |
|
||
Squalus acanthias |
|
||
Symphodus cinereus |
|
||
Symphodus ocellatus |
|
||
Symphodus roissali |
|
||
Syngnathus abaster |
|
||
Syngnathus typhle |
|
||
Syngnathus variegatus |
|
||
Trachinus draco |
|
||
Uranoscopus scaber |
|
||
Element2 | |||
Element sources | No. of elements per level |
|
|
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1 Fish | ||
D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch |
|
|
|
D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) |
|
|
|
D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) |
|
|
|
D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) |
|
||
D1C5 Habitat for the species |
|
||
Threshold values | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 36% (528) |
87% (7) |
Threshold value sources | D1 Fish | ||
D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch |
|
|
|
D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) |
|
|
|
D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) |
|
|
|
D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) |
|
||
D1C5 Habitat for the species |
|
||
Value achieved upper | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 22% (321) |
100% (8) |
Value achieved lower | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 4% (60) |
100% (8) |
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1 Fish | ||
D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch |
|
||
D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) |
|
|
|
D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) |
|
|
|
D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) |
|
||
D1C5 Habitat for the species | |||
Proportion threshold values | Range of % values (no. of parameters) | ||
Proportion values achieved | Range of % values (no. of parameters) | Range: 52-52% (1 of 8 parameters) |
|
Proportion threshold value units | % of population achieving threshold value % of samples achieving threshold value |
||
Trends | No. of trends per category |
|
|
Parameters achieved | No. of parameters per category |
|
|
Related indicators |
|
||
Criteria status | No. of criteria per category |
|
|
Element status | No. of elements per category |
|
|
Integration rule type for parameters | OOAO (1434 or 100.0%) |
||
Integration rule description for parameters | - the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
||
Integration rule type for criteria | OOAO (1434 or 100.0%) |
||
Integration rule description for criteria | - the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule; - the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule; - the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%. - the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
||
GES extent threshold |
|
||
GES extent achieved |
|
||
GES extent unit |
|
||
GES achieved | Coastal fish |
|
|
Demersal shelf fish |
|
|
|
Pelagic shelf fish |
|
||
Assessment period | 2012-2017 (1434 or 100.0%) |
2012-2017 (8 or 100.0%) |
|
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets | 3 |
1 |