Member State report / Art10 / 2018 / D6 / Mediterranean
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
Region/subregion | Mediterranean |
Reported by | Member state |
Member state | United Kingdom |
Spain |
France |
Italy |
Malta |
Slovenia |
Croatia |
Greece |
Cyprus |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Member state report | ||||||||||
Reporting area(s) | MRUs used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Features | Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Species |
|
|
|||||||
Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Habitats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Ecosystems, including food webs |
|
|
|
|||||||
Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: No theme |
|
|||||||||
Anthropogenic pressures on the marine environment: Biological |
|
|
|
|||||||
Anthropogenic pressures on the marine environment: Physical |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Anthropogenic pressures on the marine environment: Substances, litter and energy |
|
|
||||||||
Anthropogenic pressures on the marine environment: No theme |
|
|||||||||
Pressure levels and impacts in marine environment: Biological |
|
|||||||||
Pressure levels and impacts in marine environment: Chemical |
|
|||||||||
Uses and human activities in or affecting the marine environment: Physical restructuring of rivers, coastline or seabed (water management) |
|
|||||||||
GES components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Target | Number defined | 57 |
16 |
5 |
2 |
8 |
11 |
1 |
||
Target code/description |
A.3.6: Maintain the parameters and trends of state or condition descriptors of benthic communities (and their different facies and associations) within values to ensure their durability and performance, as well as the maintenance of their characteristic species, key and unique species.
... |
D01-HB-OE10: Avoid abrasion and smothering of the most representative areas of deep habitats (Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems*) and reduce the abrasion of particular geomorphological structures**: * Definition of Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems based on..:- the IFREMER proposal for France transm...
|
T 1.2: Increase in the number of marine habitats listed in the Habitats Directive and referred to in the SPA/BD Protocol of the Barcelona Convention which maintains or achieves a favourable conservation status
T 6.1: A specific regulation to limit the impact of physical loss on ... |
MT_Target_2019_D6C5b: The intensity and distribution of otter bottom trawling are stable and do not increase significantly through time. MT_Target_2019_D6C5a: Extent of seabed habitats subject to physical disturbance as a result of anchoring and mooring is reduced. |
D6-3: Achieving good and preventing deterioration of benthic communities, evaluated using already developed and operational multi-metric indices to assess the status and functionality of the benthic community in accordance with Directive 2000/60 / EC.
D6C5: Prevention of deterio... |
D6T1: Spatial extent and distribution of physical loss of the natural seabed does not increase to an extent that endangers the functioning of the ecosystem. Target 6: Distribution of photophilic algal community is in accordance with the expected pattern throughout the established distributional range. D6T5: Posidonia oceanica: a) The area of distribution of P. oceanica meadow is not decreasing. b) Ecological quality of P. oceanica meadow is not decreasing. Target 5: a) Range of photophilic algal community is stable or increasing according to all indicators monitored and not below then Favourable Reference Range (according to Habitat Directive). b) Range of Posidonia meadow is stable or increasing and is not less than the FRR value (Favourable Reference Range for HD habitats). c) Distributional range of Coralligenous assemblages in Croatia is stable or increasing and not smaller than the FRR value (Favourable Reference Range for HD habitats). D6T3: Posidonia oceanica meadow: a) The area of distribution of P. oceanica meadow is not decreasing. b) Ecological quality of P. oceanica meadow is not decreasing. Target 7: a) Coastline colonized by Cystoseira amantacea is stable or increasing and not smaller that the baseline value. b) The upper and lower limits of Posidonia meadows are not in regression. D6T6: Biocenosis of sublittoral algae: a) Good ecological status of benthic communities on hard bottoms is not decreasing. b) Distribution of biocenosis is maintained. c) Species composition is maintained and in accordance with nature of substrate and environmental conditions. Sublittoral fine sands with different amount of mud: a) Good ecological status of benthic communities on soft bottoms is not decreasing. b) Distribution of biocenosis is maintained. c) Species composition is maintained and in accordance with nature of substrate and environmental conditions. Sublittoral coarse sands with different amount of mud: a) Good ecological status of benthic communities on soft bottoms is not decreasing. b) Distribution of biocenosis is maintained. c) Species composition is maintained and in accordance with nature of substrate and environmental conditions. Circalittoral muds: a) Good ecological status of benthic communities on soft bottoms is not decreasing. b) Distribution of biocenosis is maintained. c) Species composition is maintained and in accordance with nature of substrate and environmental conditions. Circalittoral sands: a) Good ecological status of benthic communities on soft bottoms is not decreasing. b) Distribution of biocenosis is maintained. c) Species composition is maintained and in accordance with nature of substrate and environmental conditions. Bathyal muds: a) Good ecological status of benthic communities on soft bottoms is not decreasing. b) Distribution of biocenosis is maintained. c) Species composition is maintained and in accordance with nature of substrate and environmental conditions. D6T4: Intertidal hard bottom and rocks: a) Good ecological status of benthic communities on hard bottoms is not decreasing. b) Distribution of biocenosis is maintained. Biocenosis of sublittoral algae: a) Good ecological status of benthic communities on hard bottoms is not decreasing. b) Distribution of biocenosis is maintained. Target 9: a) Posidonia oceanica shoot density is not decreasing. b) Relative abundances and plankton biomass are not significantly changed from naturally occuring conditions. D6T2: Spatial extent and distribution of physical disturbance pressures on the seabed are in an extent that enables sustainable use of ecosystem. Target 8: a) Upper infralittoral algal communities are in High and Good ecological status according to WFD. b) Posidonia oceanica has Good and High ecological status according to WFD. c) Posidonia meadows have Good and High ecological status according to WFD. d) Habitat structure and function of Coralligenous assemblages in Croatia are maintained. e) Taxonomic diversity of planktonic species is not significantly changed from naturally occurring conditions. |
Target4: Target 4: The marine environment of Cyprus is considered to be in good environmental status by the year 2020 if the structure and function of the ecosystem are safeguarded and not adversely affected. Specifically, diversity and productivity are maintained, and any pressures do not hinder the ecosystem components to recover and/or retain their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes. |
|||
Target value | No. of parameters/elements with quantitative values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Target status | No. of assessments per category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Assessment period | No. of targets per period | 0212-2018 (1 - 2.6%) 2012-2018 (37 - 94.9%) 2012-2108 (1 - 2.6%) |
2012-2018 (6 - 24.0%) 2015-2021 (19 - 76.0%) |
2012-2017 (15 - 100.0%) |
2020-2025 (2 - 100.0%) |
2013-2018 (9 - 100.0%) |
2012-2018 (1 - 100.0%) |
|||
Timescale to achieve targets | No. of targets per date | 2020-12 (39 - 51.3%) 2024-12 (37 - 48.7%) |
2020-12 (6 - 23.1%) 2026-12 (20 - 76.9%) |
2020-12 (15 - 100.0%) |
2025-12 (2 - 100.0%) |
2020-01 (5 - 62.5%) 2024-12 (3 - 37.5%) |
2018-10 (1 - 9.1%) 2020-10 (4 - 36.4%) 2024-12 (6 - 54.5%) |
2018-12 (1 - 100.0%) |
||
Update date | No. of targets per date | 2012-11 (39 - 51.3%) 2019-07 (37 - 48.7%) |
2019-09 (26 - 100.0%) |
2018-12 (15 - 100.0%) |
2019-12 (2 - 100.0%) |
2013-04 (5 - 62.5%) 2020-01 (3 - 37.5%) |
2014-07 (4 - 36.4%) 2019-05 (1 - 9.1%) 2019-06 (4 - 36.4%) 2019-07 (2 - 18.2%) |
2012-12 (1 - 100.0%) |
||
Update type | No. of targets per category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Related indicators | No. of different indicators reported | 8 |
19 |
2 |
||||||
Related measures | No. of different measures reported | 30 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
9 |