Member State report / Art13 / 2022 / D4 / Belgium / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 13 Programme of measures (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2022-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems |
Member State | Belgium |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | FPS Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment |
Report date | 2022-03-21 |
Report access | 363 |
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RegionSubregion |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
Measure code |
1 |
11A |
11B |
11C |
12 |
2 |
3F |
4A |
4B |
4D |
6A |
6B |
6C |
6D |
6E |
7C |
9 |
ANSBE-M001 |
ANSBE-M004 |
ANSBE-M005 |
ANSBE-M007 |
ANSBE-M008 |
ANSBE-M022 |
ANSBE-M053 |
Measure old code |
1 |
11A |
11B |
11C |
12 |
2 |
3F |
4A |
4B |
4D |
6A |
6B |
6C |
6D |
6E |
7C |
9 |
ANSBE-M001 |
ANSBE-M004 |
ANSBE-M005 |
ANSBE-M007 |
ANSBE-M008 |
||
Measure name |
Report on Environmental Impacts (REI) and Adapted Evaluation (AE) |
Ban on recreational fishing with tangled nets at sea (species protection RD 21/12/2001) |
Ban of gillnetting and beach tangled nets in the whole Flemish beach area |
Ban on fishing and by-catch of marine species, obligation to immediately release the animals still alive and unhurt and obligation of notification (law on marine environment) |
Ban on shipping (including fisheries) within the wind farm areas |
Definition targets to maintain MPAs. Development of the policy and management plans for the MPAs and their associated measures |
Follow-up during the construction and operation (hard substrates introduction, sub-marine noise, benthos, etc.) |
Zoning: Delimitation of areas for extraction of sand |
Periodic closing of the extraction areas
|
Authorisation conditions: annual compensation/ allowance for follow-up activities (according to the material and the volume extracted) |
Centralization of new cables and pipes in a minimum number of corridors |
Redefining of the sectors in Zone 2 (sand extraction) |
Revision of extraction volumes (sand extraction)
|
New dumping/spillage area for the dredged materials |
Limitation of fishing that impairs the seabed in the ‘Vlaamse Banken’ area (commercial and recreational fisheries); Follow-up of the seabed protection areas (used in the follow-up programme of the MSFD) |
Ban of certain activities in the special protection areas: civil construction, industrial activities, and commercial and advertising company activities |
Introduction of the SumWing technique, the diabolos (targeting and developing more selective techniques which have less impact on the seabed and which help to save energy), and raising awareness; supported by the Belgian operational programme for EMFAF |
Better consultation structure needed between Flemish and Federal authorities for fisheries policy
|
Verbod op weghalen stenen/grind
|
Test naar herstel van grindbedden
|
Controle beperkingen voor visserij binnen de bodembeschermingszones
|
Monitoring bodembeschermingszones
|
Exploration for the designation of a marine reserve at sea
|
Preparation of the cumulative impact assessment methodology
|
Measure description |
This measure goes a step further than the previous measure on the definition and establishment of soil protection zone (s) and looks at the possible designation of a marine reserve at sea, where all anthropogenic pressures are excluded. Given that BNZ is characterised by a large number of users within a relatively limited area, an offshore marine reserve will require considerable preparatory work. As a first step, efforts could be made to match opportunities with the various sectors, knowledge institutions, policy-makers, etc., with a focus on the support of the various stakeholders. At a later stage, it will be possible to identify possible options for the location. It is important to use the results of scientific monitoring and studies (see also section Description measure 1a) in order to maximise the contribution to GES.
|
Developing a standard methodology for and carrying out a cumulative impact assessment of activities taking place within BNZ (holistic approach)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Update type |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure category |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 2.b |
Category 2.b |
Category 2.b |
Category 2.b |
Category 2.b |
Category 2.b |
Category 2.b |
Policy conventions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policy national |
Verbod recreatieve warrelnetvisserij op zee (soortenbeschermings KB 21/12/2001) |
Verbod strandwarrel- en kieuwnetten in de volledige Vlaamse strandzone |
Verbod vangst en bijvangst walvisachtigen en zeehonden, verplichting om levende en niet gewonde dieren onmiddellijk vrij te laten en meldingsplicht (Wet Marien Milieu) |
Deze maatregel had niet expliciet als doel het bodemoppervlak te beschermen maar was ingevoerd omwille van veiligheidsoverwegingen. Niettemin heeft deze maatregelen uiteindelijk wel positieve neveneffecten voor D1, D4 en D6. |
Vergunningsvoorwaarden windparken en kabels |
Vergunningsvoorwaarden zandontginning |
Vergunningsvoorwaarden zandontginning |
Maatregelen uit het Marien Ruimtelijk Plan |
Maatregelen uit het Marien Ruimtelijk Plan |
Maatregelen uit het Marien Ruimtelijk Plan |
Maatregelen uit het Marien Ruimtelijk Plan |
Maatregelen uit het Marien Ruimtelijk Plan |
Maatregelen MPA's |
Belgian operational programme for EMFAF |
||||||||||
Responsible competent authority |
FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu – Directoraat-generaal Leefmilieu – Dienst Marien Milieu en het Departement Landbouw en Visserij, Afd. Landbouw en Visserijbeleid - Dienst Zeevisserij |
FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu – Directoraat-generaal Leefmilieu – Dienst Marien Milieu |
FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu – Directoraat-generaal Leefmilieu – Dienst Marien Milieu |
FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu – Directoraat-generaal Leefmilieu – Dienst Marien Milieu |
FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu – Directoraat-generaal Leefmilieu – Dienst Marien Milieu |
Federale Overheidsdienst Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu, Dienst Marien Milieu |
Federale Overheidsdienst Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu, Dienst Marien Milieu |
|||||||||||||||||
Responsible organisation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coordination level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation countries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||||||||||||
CEA reference |
Belgische Staat, 2016. Programma van maatregelen voor de Belgische mariene wateren. Kaderrichtlijn Mariene Strategie – Art 13. Federale Overheidsdienst Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu, Brussel, België, 147 pp. |
Belgische Staat, 2016 |
Belgische Staat, 2016 |
Belgische Staat, 2016 |
Belgische Staat, 2016 |
see supporting documents |
see supporting documents |
|||||||||||||||||
CBA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||||||||||||
CBA reference |
Belgische Staat, 2016. Programma van maatregelen voor de Belgische mariene wateren. Kaderrichtlijn Mariene Strategie – Art 13. Federale Overheidsdienst Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu, Brussel, België, 147 pp. |
Belgische Staat, 2016 |
Belgische Staat, 2016 |
Belgische Staat, 2016 |
Belgische Staat, 2016 |
see supporting documents |
see supporting documents |
|||||||||||||||||
Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measure purpose |
Indirectly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by governance mechanisms, financial incentives, awareness campaigns) |
Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity) |
Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity) |
Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity) |
Establish monitoring programmes (of relevant activities, pressures or impacts) |
Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity) |
Indirectly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by governance mechanisms, financial incentives, awareness campaigns) |
|||||||||||||||||
Pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Relevant KTMs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
GEScomponent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Temporal scope |
2015-2021 |
2015-2021 |
2015-2021 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Implementation status |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure withdrawn |
Measure withdrawn |
Measure implemented |
Implementation not started |
Implementation not started |
Implementation delay |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||
Implementation reason |
Mechanism for implementation - EU |
Mechanism for implementation - EU |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Progress description |
Onderlinge samenwerking tussen Vlaamse en federale overheden zijn verbeterd door middel van verschillende fora: onderhandelingen over visserijmaatregelen, beroepsopleiding vissers, streven naar betere recyclagemogelijkheden voor visnetten.
|
Geïmplementeerd (wordt meegenomen in herziening van de Wet MM)
|
Om de test naar het herstel van grindbedden te kunnen uitvoeren is het noodzakelijk dat deze zone kan afgesloten worden van bodemberoerende visserij. Anders is het risico op incidenten veel te hoog. Door het verwerpen van de delegated act, zullen in de eerstkomende jaren dus geen zones gevrijwaard kunnen worden van bodemberoerende visserij. Dit maakt het onmogelijk om dit herstelexperiment uit te voeren.
|
Zelfde obstakels zoals voor maatregel 'test naar herstel van grindbedden'.
|
De voorgestelde bodembeschermingszones waar visserijbeperkende maatregelen van kracht zouden worden, werden in 2017 nauwkeurig gemonitord om de beginsituatie van het benthos en epifauna in kaart te brengen. Zowel voor de zanderige habitats als de resterende grindbedden werden bijkomende stalen genomen en alle geassocieerde fauna werd geteld en gedetermineerd. Deze maatregel had als doel om de evolutie van deze fauna nauwkeurig te blijven opvolgen om het effect van het uitsluiten van bepaalde visserijtechnieken te kunnen meten. Door het verwerpen van de delegated act (op basis van de Joint Recommendation door België), kunnen deze bodembeschermingszones niet gesloten worden voor de verstorende visserijtechnieken. De voorziene monitoring heeft op dit moment dus geen nut.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Reason description |