Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-F / Bulgaria / Black Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Fish |
| Member State | Bulgaria |
| Region/subregion | Black Sea |
| Reported by | Ministry of Environment and Water |
| Report date | 2022-03-29 |
| Report access | BG_ART8_GES.xml |
Emine-Sozopol (BLK-BG-AA-EmineMaslennos)
GES component |
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Element |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Element code |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Parameter other |
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.029 |
0.0001 |
1.555 |
0.105 |
0.331 |
1218.16 |
0.004 |
8.16 |
9.9 |
8.51 |
1.18 |
0.076 |
0.415 |
17.04 |
0.003 |
0.09 |
1.775 |
66.47 |
0.196 |
4.26 |
11.863 |
6849.42 |
0.662 |
74.53 |
13.6 |
17.47 |
10.45 |
13.28 |
0.019 |
0.0004 |
0.149 |
0.007 |
11.93 |
66.696 |
0.29 |
2.015 |
20.7 |
16.2 |
0.03 |
37.5 |
0.001 |
4.87 |
1.459 |
0.119 |
0.006 |
0.001 |
5.11 |
51.874 |
0.11 |
2.62 |
18.09 |
13.93 |
0.454 |
0.016 |
0.201 |
0.004 |
1.893 |
0.081 |
0.059 |
0.001 |
1.7 |
0.01 |
8.909 |
161.53 |
0.48 |
6.32 |
24.79 |
18.0 |
11.168 |
0.602 |
18.37 |
14.91 |
0.095 |
0.041 |
1.7 |
0.03 |
0.529 |
20.45 |
3.633 |
67.7 |
5.11 |
0.14 |
15.0 |
11.6 |
0.007 |
0.001 |
0.022 |
0.001 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
5.094 |
0.43 |
34.619 |
4.806 |
0.164 |
23.841 |
1.472 |
0.214 |
19.695 |
18.525 |
21.863 |
0.845 |
0.012 |
12.755 |
5.06 |
0.074 |
58.46 |
4.047 |
0.622 |
12.755 |
4.706 |
0.706 |
23.84 |
4.868 |
0.273 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. Not registered in the MRU. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. Not registered in the MRU. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Low number of individuals. Data comes from gillnets survey. |
Low number of individuals. Data comes from gillnets survey. |
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold values yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description parameter |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galata-Emine (BLK-BG-AA-GalataEmine)
GES component |
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Element |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Element code |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Parameter other |
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.029 |
0.0001 |
1.555 |
0.105 |
0.331 |
1218.16 |
0.004 |
8.16 |
9.9 |
8.51 |
1.18 |
0.076 |
0.415 |
17.04 |
0.003 |
0.09 |
1.775 |
66.47 |
0.196 |
4.26 |
11.863 |
6849.42 |
0.662 |
74.53 |
13.6 |
17.47 |
10.45 |
13.28 |
0.019 |
0.0004 |
0.149 |
0.007 |
11.93 |
66.696 |
0.29 |
2.015 |
20.7 |
16.2 |
0.03 |
37.5 |
0.001 |
4.87 |
1.459 |
0.119 |
0.006 |
0.001 |
5.11 |
51.874 |
0.11 |
2.62 |
18.09 |
13.93 |
0.454 |
0.016 |
0.201 |
0.004 |
1.893 |
0.081 |
0.059 |
0.001 |
1.7 |
0.01 |
8.909 |
161.53 |
0.48 |
6.32 |
24.79 |
18.0 |
11.168 |
0.602 |
18.37 |
14.91 |
0.095 |
0.041 |
1.7 |
0.03 |
0.529 |
20.45 |
3.633 |
67.7 |
5.11 |
0.14 |
15.0 |
11.6 |
0.007 |
0.001 |
0.022 |
0.001 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
1.923 |
0.004 |
21.783 |
1.488 |
5.424 |
2335.576 |
0.058 |
34.806 |
10.58 |
9.42 |
19.361 |
1.311 |
3.975 |
40.906 |
0.036 |
1.023 |
13.714 |
427.969 |
1.404 |
549.365 |
25.13 |
19.25 |
56.183 |
8096.083 |
3.077 |
549.365 |
15.53 |
19.45 |
12.08 |
16.99 |
0.794 |
0.02 |
3.881 |
0.147 |
136.353 |
420.089 |
2.127 |
11.511 |
23.2 |
17.76 |
122.718 |
32.807 |
11.925 |
0.883 |
0.204 |
0.04 |
40.906 |
364.693 |
4.193 |
15.972 |
19.0 |
14.42 |
4.907 |
0.21 |
9.77 |
0.235 |
21.786 |
1.061 |
1.736 |
0.01 |
20.453 |
0.205 |
60.291 |
490.87 |
3.165 |
69.953 |
27.92 |
30.55 |
18.38 |
25.9 |
43.983 |
2.307 |
21.57 |
17.29 |
5.059 |
2.148 |
40.906 |
0.818 |
4.721 |
163.623 |
30.083 |
443.01 |
20.453 |
0.614 |
25.0 |
187606.909 |
1425.126 |
15.0 |
12.121 |
0.484 |
0.06 |
1.439 |
0.081 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
7.92 |
7.32 |
16.77 |
16.05 |
12.1 |
11.64 |
9.926 |
9.91 |
16.18 |
14.1 |
15.1 |
13.46 |
15.94 |
21.54 |
10.1 |
14.46 |
15.32 |
13.15 |
13.4 |
10.146 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. Not registered in the MRU. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold values yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description parameter |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
71.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
89.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
74.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 14 species in "Good" status, 1 species status is "Unknown" and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there is four species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
The results show that there are two species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has been achieved. |
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaliakra-Galata (BLK-BG-AA-KaliakraGalata)
GES component |
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Element |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Element code |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Parameter other |
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.029 |
0.0001 |
1.555 |
0.105 |
0.331 |
1218.16 |
0.004 |
8.16 |
9.9 |
8.51 |
1.18 |
0.076 |
0.415 |
17.04 |
0.003 |
0.09 |
1.775 |
66.47 |
0.196 |
4.26 |
11.863 |
6849.42 |
0.662 |
74.53 |
13.6 |
17.47 |
10.45 |
13.28 |
0.019 |
0.0004 |
0.149 |
0.007 |
11.93 |
66.696 |
0.29 |
2.015 |
20.7 |
16.2 |
0.03 |
37.5 |
0.001 |
4.87 |
1.459 |
0.119 |
0.006 |
0.001 |
5.11 |
51.874 |
0.11 |
2.62 |
18.09 |
13.93 |
0.454 |
0.016 |
0.201 |
0.004 |
1.893 |
0.081 |
0.059 |
0.001 |
1.7 |
0.01 |
8.909 |
161.53 |
0.48 |
6.32 |
24.79 |
18.0 |
11.168 |
0.602 |
18.37 |
14.91 |
0.095 |
0.041 |
1.7 |
0.03 |
0.529 |
20.45 |
3.633 |
67.7 |
5.11 |
0.14 |
15.0 |
11.6 |
0.007 |
0.001 |
0.022 |
0.001 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
5.581 |
0.352 |
24.026 |
346.126 |
188.985 |
3.461 |
1.432 |
7.77 |
7.4 |
9.796 |
0.673 |
3.044 |
0.015 |
27.907 |
2.394 |
21.58 |
20.88 |
24.026 |
346.126 |
237.912 |
8.653 |
37.552 |
14.52 |
17.77 |
10.395 |
15.91 |
45.327 |
107.053 |
2.799 |
18.3 |
14.68 |
34.613 |
40.906 |
2.077 |
5.931 |
16.927 |
1.055 |
20.453 |
326.08 |
1.432 |
20.242 |
17.0 |
13.81 |
9.796 |
0.411 |
12.245 |
0.537 |
1.923 |
0.029 |
103.838 |
161.987 |
2.596 |
12.784 |
19.48 |
17.0 |
26.15 |
45.327 |
106.42 |
5.885 |
18.7 |
14.89 |
24.026 |
26.998 |
47.482 |
5.691 |
33.392 |
2.233 |
0.219 |
337515.419 |
4601.905 |
14.405 |
11.089 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
17.5 |
15.56 |
16.59 |
14.15 |
18.24 |
14.54 |
2640.756 |
41.661 |
14.025 |
10.127 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. Not registered in the MRU. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Low number of individuals. Data comes from gillnets survey. |
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold values yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description parameter |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
35.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 7 species in "Good", 1 species is with "Unknown" status and the rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sozopol-Rezovo (BLK-BG-AA-MaslennosRezovo)
GES component |
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Element |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Element code |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Parameter other |
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.029 |
0.0001 |
1.555 |
0.105 |
0.331 |
1218.16 |
0.004 |
8.16 |
9.9 |
8.51 |
1.18 |
0.076 |
0.415 |
17.04 |
0.003 |
0.09 |
1.775 |
66.47 |
0.196 |
4.26 |
11.863 |
6849.42 |
0.662 |
74.53 |
13.6 |
17.47 |
10.45 |
13.28 |
0.019 |
0.0004 |
0.149 |
0.007 |
11.93 |
66.696 |
0.29 |
2.015 |
20.7 |
16.2 |
0.03 |
37.5 |
0.001 |
4.87 |
1.459 |
0.119 |
0.006 |
0.001 |
5.11 |
51.874 |
0.11 |
2.62 |
18.09 |
13.93 |
0.454 |
0.016 |
0.201 |
0.004 |
1.893 |
0.081 |
0.059 |
0.001 |
1.7 |
0.01 |
8.909 |
161.53 |
0.48 |
6.32 |
24.79 |
18.0 |
11.168 |
0.602 |
18.37 |
14.91 |
0.095 |
0.041 |
1.7 |
0.03 |
0.529 |
20.45 |
3.633 |
67.7 |
5.11 |
0.14 |
15.0 |
11.6 |
0.007 |
0.001 |
0.022 |
0.001 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
1.333 |
0.098 |
1.223 |
0.073 |
125.53 |
7.461 |
0.214 |
11.462 |
18.379 |
1.846 |
19.175 |
16.167 |
26.076 |
0.612 |
0.011 |
11.642 |
5.969 |
0.25 |
12.496 |
4.02 |
0.203 |
32.381 |
7.367 |
0.486 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
17.34 |
14.867 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. Not registered in the MRU. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. Not registered in the MRU. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Low number of individuals. Data comes from gillnets survey. |
Low number of individuals. Data comes from gillnets survey. |
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold values yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description parameter |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are not species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is no species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shelf (BLK-BG-AA-Shelf)
GES component |
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Element |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Element code |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Parameter other |
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.029 |
0.0001 |
1.555 |
0.105 |
0.331 |
1218.16 |
0.004 |
8.16 |
9.9 |
8.51 |
1.18 |
0.076 |
0.415 |
17.04 |
0.003 |
0.09 |
1.775 |
66.47 |
0.196 |
4.26 |
11.863 |
6849.42 |
0.662 |
74.53 |
13.6 |
17.47 |
10.45 |
13.28 |
0.019 |
0.0004 |
0.149 |
0.007 |
11.93 |
66.696 |
0.29 |
2.015 |
20.7 |
16.2 |
0.03 |
37.5 |
0.001 |
4.87 |
1.459 |
0.119 |
0.006 |
0.001 |
5.11 |
51.874 |
0.11 |
2.62 |
18.09 |
13.93 |
0.454 |
0.016 |
0.201 |
0.004 |
1.893 |
0.081 |
0.059 |
0.001 |
1.7 |
0.01 |
8.909 |
161.53 |
0.48 |
6.32 |
24.79 |
18.0 |
11.168 |
0.602 |
18.37 |
14.91 |
0.095 |
0.041 |
1.7 |
0.03 |
0.529 |
20.45 |
3.633 |
67.7 |
5.11 |
0.14 |
15.0 |
11.6 |
0.007 |
0.001 |
0.022 |
0.001 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
9531.056 |
59.69 |
13.682 |
12.801 |
56.246 |
0.877 |
168.737 |
268.075 |
26.45 |
23.167 |
72427.892 |
623.97 |
15.525 |
12.756 |
81.812 |
9.367 |
268.075 |
26.239 |
26.28 |
22.87 |
40.906 |
3.579 |
1254.226 |
27.091 |
19.135 |
14.0 |
204.529 |
840.042 |
593.953 |
2.197 |
1069319.78 |
9280.508 |
17.05 |
13.81 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
7.9 |
7.54 |
2.0 |
18.0 |
8.425 |
8.05 |
20.29 |
17.34 |
15.755 |
13.2 |
11.5 |
8.71 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. Not registered in the MRU. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. Not registered in the MRU. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Low number of individuals. Data comes from gillnets survey. |
Data comes from trawl survey. No threshold yet set. |
Low number of individuals. Data comes from gillnets survey. |
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold values yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description parameter |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
22.00 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and the overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status for the period 2012-2017 and GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there is one species in "Good" status and one species is not assessed. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sivriburun-Kaliakra (BLK-BG-AA-SivriburunKaliakra)
GES component |
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Element |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Arnoglossus kessleri |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius cobitis |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius niger |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Gobius paganellus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Hippocampus guttulatus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Mesogobius batrachocephalus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Ophidion rochei |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Parablennius sanguinolentus |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Pegusa lascaris |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Ponticola cephalargoides |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Sciaena umbra |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Scorpaena porcus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus cinereus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus ocellatus |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Symphodus roissali |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus abaster |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus typhle |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Syngnathus variegatus |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Uranoscopus scaber |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Acipenser stellatus |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Oblada melanura |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Element code |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
127125 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126886 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126892 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
126893 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
154776 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126909 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126916 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126676 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
126776 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127156 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
712875 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127010 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
127247 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273567 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273572 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
273573 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127386 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127393 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127394 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
127093 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126275 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
126278 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126457 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127049 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
127056 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Habitat condition
|
Parameter other |
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
L95
|
ML
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
L95
|
ML
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.029 |
0.0001 |
1.555 |
0.105 |
0.331 |
1218.16 |
0.004 |
8.16 |
9.9 |
8.51 |
1.18 |
0.076 |
0.415 |
17.04 |
0.003 |
0.09 |
1.775 |
66.47 |
0.196 |
4.26 |
11.863 |
6849.42 |
0.662 |
74.53 |
13.6 |
17.47 |
10.45 |
13.28 |
0.019 |
0.0004 |
0.149 |
0.007 |
11.93 |
66.696 |
0.29 |
2.015 |
20.7 |
16.2 |
0.03 |
37.5 |
0.001 |
4.87 |
1.459 |
0.119 |
0.006 |
0.001 |
5.11 |
51.874 |
0.11 |
2.62 |
18.09 |
13.93 |
0.454 |
0.016 |
0.201 |
0.004 |
1.893 |
0.081 |
0.059 |
0.001 |
1.7 |
0.01 |
8.909 |
161.53 |
0.48 |
6.32 |
24.79 |
18.0 |
11.168 |
0.602 |
18.37 |
14.91 |
0.095 |
0.041 |
1.7 |
0.03 |
0.529 |
20.45 |
3.633 |
67.7 |
5.11 |
0.14 |
15.0 |
11.6 |
0.007 |
0.001 |
0.022 |
0.001 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
20.837 |
1.036 |
17.91 |
16.733 |
60.018 |
1.215 |
0.002 |
15.959 |
8.348 |
0.535 |
4.903 |
3.675 |
0.024 |
27.67 |
7.351 |
20.453 |
0.828 |
0.908 |
21.44 |
18.63 |
55.689 |
7.504 |
2986.125 |
0.406 |
76.136 |
14.8 |
16.78 |
11.96 |
15.48 |
60.018 |
3.514 |
0.095 |
23.316 |
102.265 |
62.328 |
1.99 |
1.58 |
15.49 |
15.13 |
86.494 |
81.812 |
6.545 |
20.452 |
22.052 |
1.002 |
4.6 |
21.615 |
17.775 |
81.228 |
20.453 |
0.102 |
8.597 |
224.982 |
0.456 |
7.416 |
24.25 |
18.759 |
2.502 |
16.05 |
14.725 |
68.768 |
8.378 |
818.116 |
79.142 |
8385.693 |
62.481 |
6.719 |
28.93 |
25.1 |
201045.416 |
1038.215 |
16.42 |
14.11 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
15.38 |
13.83 |
143.17 |
3.561 |
12.0 |
16.16 |
9.79 |
14.57 |
15.44 |
13.93 |
14.4 |
13.24 |
24.46 |
23.08 |
13.75 |
10.69 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
centimetre
|
centimetre
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Kilograms per square kilometer
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
Number of individuals per 100 square meters per 24 hours |
Kilograms per 100 square meters per 24 hours
|
square kilometer
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. Not registered in the MRU. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
Threshold is for data, derived from trawl surveys only. |
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. Not registered in the MRU. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No threshold values yet set
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Low number of individuals. Data comes from gillnets survey. |
Low number of individuals. Data comes from gillnets survey. |
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold values yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No thresholds yet set. |
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
Data comes from trawl survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey. No threshold yet set. |
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
Data comes from gillnets survey.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No threshold values yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
No thresholds yet set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
Not recorded in the MRU
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description parameter |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
- the integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)"; |
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
- the integration of the individual criteria for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the integration of MRU for each species - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule;
- the assessment for the different groups of fish is formed by the percentage of species that are in "Good" status. The threshold value is 90%.
- the overall assessment under Descriptor 1 - Fish - under the "One Out All Out (OAAO)" rule, applied to all groups of non-commercial fish. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
44.00 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 4 species in "Good" status, one species is not evaluated and its status is "Unknown". The rest of the species are in "Not good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the functional group of coastal fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. These results must be interpreted with caution, as they are based on data that are not collected regularly and do not have the same time and space extent. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are 2 species in "Good" status. The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the demersal shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
The results show that there are no species in "Good" status and for 1 species the status is "Unknown". The overall assessment of the descriptor shows that the pelagic shelf fish are in "Not good" status and for the period 2012-2017, GES has not been achieved. |
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|