Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D5 / Bulgaria / Black Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D5 Eutrophication |
Member State | Bulgaria |
Region/subregion | Black Sea |
Reported by | Ministry of Environment and Water |
Report date | 2022-03-29 |
Report access | BG_ART8_GES.xml |
Emine-Sozopol (BLK-BG-AA-EmineMaslennos)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Chlorophyll-a |
Chlorophyll-a |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Transparency |
Transparency |
Transparency |
Oxygen saturation |
Oxygen saturation |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities - sensitive species |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities - sensitive species |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Element code |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
Combined_K |
Combined_K |
109921 |
QE3-1-1 |
QE3-1-1 |
QE3-1-1 |
EEA_3131-01-9 |
EEA_3131-01-9 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
|
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Undefined
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C2
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C4
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
D5C5
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C8
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
N-NH4 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NH4 concentration in the water (summer)
|
DIP concentration in the water (spring)
|
DIP concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (summer)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (spring) |
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (summer)
|
Number of potentially toxic species
|
Number of sequences of potentially toxic species
|
Noctiluca scintillans biomass
|
Noctiluca scintillans biomass
|
Transparency of water (spring)
|
Transparency of water (summer)
|
Oxygen saturation in the surface water (spring)
|
Oxygen saturation in the surface water (summer)
|
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of tolerant macroalgae species biomass
|
the proportion (%) of the wet biomass of the opportunistic macrolagae within a seagrass meadow |
Total projected cover of macroalgae tolerant species (lower infralittoral) |
Maximal depth distribution of Ericaria bosphorica (Cystoseira crinita |
Maximal depth distribution of Gongolaria barbata (Cystoseira barbata
|
Maximal depth distribution of Phyllophora crispa and other sciophylic sensitive macroalgae (lower infralitoral) |
Proportion of sensitive macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species cover (Ecological index- EQR-cover) |
Total projected cover of macroalgae sensitive species of Phyllophora crispa and other sciophylic sensitive macroalgae (lower infralittoral) |
Ecological Index EI
|
the proportion (%) of the wet biomass of the sesnsitive species within a seagrass meadow |
EQR M-AMBI(n)
|
Threshold value upper |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
1.0 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.12 |
3.4 |
1.5 |
30.0 |
30.0 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
116.0 |
110.0 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
40.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
10.0 |
100.0 |
0.68 |
|||||||
Threshold value lower |
3.4 |
1.5 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
105.0 |
95.0 |
0.644 |
0.6 |
0.644 |
0.664 |
6.0 |
60.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.83 |
0.78 |
0.209 |
0.229 |
2.99 |
0.33 |
0.195 |
0.119 |
3.61 |
3.5 |
9.0 |
12.0 |
119.0 |
111.0 |
36.42 |
10.0 |
100.0 |
1.0 |
||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
0.27 |
0.16 |
0.052 |
0.023 |
0.03 |
0.1 |
0.038 |
0.053 |
0.35 |
0.06 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
103.0 |
102.0 |
5.1 |
53.0 |
0.38 |
|||||||||||||||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
metre
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
percentage
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
||
Value unit other |
score
|
EQR
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
82.0 |
78.0 |
80.0 |
97.0 |
100.0 |
99.0 |
100.0 |
88.0 |
60.0 |
92.0 |
68.0 |
98.0 |
89.0 |
89.0 |
12.26 |
89.0 |
89.0 |
89.0 |
12.26 |
12.26 |
74.2 |
|||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Description parameter |
Not all of polygons from the MSFD program are investigated. |
The assessment is based on point data. It is assumed that the assessment of the one point (0-3 m) for each meadow is relevant for the whole 0-3 m depth strip of each meadow. The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on results for some of the meadows monitored during the assessment period (i.e. not all available meadows have been assessed).
Trend analysis is not possible for seagrass meadows due to the lack of relevant data from the previous assessment period (before 2012) and due to the low sampling frequency per meadow during this period (2012-2017). |
This indicator was not assessed, due to insufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on the results for some of the stations (polygons) monitored during the assessment period (not all stations (polygons) from the monitoring program have been assessed).
. |
The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on the results for some of the stations (polygons) monitored during the assessment period (not all stations (polygons) from the monitoring program have been assessed).
. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
The assessment is based on point data. It is assumed that the assessment of the one point (0-3 m) for each meadow is relevant for the whole 0-3 m depth strip of each meadow. The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on results for some of the meadows monitored during the assessment period (i.e. not all available meadows have been assessed).
Trend analysis is not possible for seagrass meadows due to the lack of relevant data from the previous assessment period (before 2012) and due to the low sampling frequency per meadow during this period (2012-2017). |
The assessment is based on point data. It is assumed that the assessment of the one point (0-3 m) for each meadow is relevant for the whole 0-3 m depth strip of each meadow. The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on results for some of the meadows monitored during the assessment period (i.e. not all available meadows have been assessed).
Trend analysis is not possible for seagrass meadows due to the lack of relevant data from the previous assessment period (before 2012) and due to the low sampling frequency per meadow during this period (2012-2017). |
Although specific proportion threshold is not set for D5C8, the proportion 74.2 % of the seabed over which the EQR threshold value set has been achieved is insufficient to reach the overall GES proportion threshold of 90 %. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Description element |
The annual average transparency within seagrass habitats is not assessed due to the lack of relevant data. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
56.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galata-Emine (BLK-BG-AA-GalataEmine)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Chlorophyll-a |
Chlorophyll-a |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Transparency |
Transparency |
Transparency |
Oxygen saturation |
Oxygen saturation |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities - sensitive species |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities - sensitive species |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Element code |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
Combined_K |
Combined_K |
109921 |
QE3-1-1 |
QE3-1-1 |
QE3-1-1 |
EEA_3131-01-9 |
EEA_3131-01-9 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
|
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Undefined
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C2
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C4
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
D5C5
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C8
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
N-NH4 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NH4 concentration in the water (summer)
|
DIP concentration in the water (spring)
|
DIP concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (summer)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (spring)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (summer)
|
Number of potentially toxic species
|
Number of sequences of potentially toxic species
|
Noctiluca scintillans biomass
|
Noctiluca scintillans biomass
|
Transparency of water (spring)
|
Transparency of water (summer)
|
Oxygen saturation in the surface water (spring)
|
Oxygen saturation in the surface water (summer)
|
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of tolerant macroalgae species biomass
|
the proportion (%) of the wet biomass of the opportunistic macrolagae within a seagrass meadow |
Total projected cover of macroalgae tolerant species (lower infralittoral) |
Maximal depth distribution of Ericaria bosphorica (Cystoseira crinita |
Maximal depth distribution of Gongolaria barbata (Cystoseira barbata
|
Maximal depth distribution of Phyllophora crispa and other sciophylic sensitive macroalgae (lower infralitoral) |
Proportion of sensitive macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species cover (Ecological index- EQR-cover) |
Total projected cover of macroalgae sensitive species of Phyllophora crispa and other sciophylic sensitive macroalgae (lower infralittoral) |
Ecological Index EI
|
the proportion (%) of the wet biomass of the sesnsitive species within a seagrass meadow |
EQR M-AMBI(n)
|
Threshold value upper |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
1.0 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.12 |
3.4 |
1.5 |
30.0 |
30.0 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
116.0 |
110.0 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
40.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
10.0 |
100.0 |
0.68 |
|||||||
Threshold value lower |
3.4 |
1.5 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
105.0 |
95.0 |
0.644 |
0.6 |
0.644 |
0.664 |
6.0 |
60.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.62 |
1.41 |
0.42 |
0.202 |
1.32 |
0.43 |
0.204 |
0.093 |
6.6 |
3.4 |
7.0 |
13.0 |
119.0 |
106.0 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
100.0 |
1.0 |
||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
0.44 |
0.1 |
0.109 |
0.046 |
0.19 |
0.21 |
0.138 |
0.036 |
0.59 |
0.24 |
0.5 |
4.0 |
114.0 |
103.0 |
88.0 |
0.4 |
||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
metre
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
percentage
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
||
Value unit other |
score
|
EQR
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
72.0 |
6.0 |
17.0 |
60.0 |
28.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
93.0 |
3.0 |
8.0 |
90.0 |
35.0 |
100.0 |
80.0 |
80.0 |
22.28 |
80.0 |
80.0 |
40.0 |
22.28 |
22.28 |
48.6 |
||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Description parameter |
Not all of polygons from the MSFD program are investigated. |
The assessment is based on point data. It is assumed that the assessment of the one point (0-3 m) for each meadow is relevant for the whole 0-3 m depth strip of each meadow. The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on results for some of the meadows monitored during the assessment period (i.e. not all available meadows have been assessed).
Trend analysis is not possible for seagrass meadows due to the lack of relevant data from the previous assessment period (before 2012) and due to the low sampling frequency per meadow during this period (2012-2017). |
This indicator was not assessed, due to insufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on the results for some of the stations (polygons) monitored during the assessment period (not all stations (polygons) from the monitoring program have been assessed).
. |
The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on the results for some of the stations (polygons) monitored during the assessment period (not all stations (polygons) from the monitoring program have been assessed).
. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
The assessment is based on point data. It is assumed that the assessment of the one point (0-3 m) for each meadow is relevant for the whole 0-3 m depth strip of each meadow. The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on results for some of the meadows monitored during the assessment period (i.e. not all available meadows have been assessed).
Trend analysis is not possible for seagrass meadows due to the lack of relevant data from the previous assessment period (before 2012) and due to the low sampling frequency per meadow during this period (2012-2017). |
The assessment is based on point data. It is assumed that the assessment of the one point (0-3 m) for each meadow is relevant for the whole 0-3 m depth strip of each meadow. The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on results for some of the meadows monitored during the assessment period (i.e. not all available meadows have been assessed).
Trend analysis is not possible for seagrass meadows due to the lack of relevant data from the previous assessment period (before 2012) and due to the low sampling frequency per meadow during this period (2012-2017). |
Although specific proportion threshold is not set for D5C8, the proportion 48.6 % of the seabed over which the EQR threshold value set has been achieved is insufficient to reach the overall GES proportion threshold of 90 %. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Description element |
The annual average transparency within seagrass habitats is not assessed due to the lack of relevant data. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
The assessment is valid only for the 0 to 3 m depth strip of the seagrass meadows. It is based on point data (1 point per habitat). The status of the areas below the 3 m depth boundary is not assessed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaliakra-Galata (BLK-BG-AA-KaliakraGalata)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Chlorophyll-a |
Chlorophyll-a |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Transparency |
Transparency |
Oxygen saturation |
Oxygen saturation |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Element code |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
Combined_K |
Combined_K |
109921 |
QE3-1-1 |
QE3-1-1 |
EEA_3131-01-9 |
EEA_3131-01-9 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
|
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C2
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C4
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
D5C5
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C8
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
N-NH4 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NH4 concentration in the water (summer)
|
DIP concentration in the water (spring)
|
DIP concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (summer)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (spring)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (summer)
|
Number of potentially toxic species
|
Number of sequences of potentially toxic species
|
Noctiluca scintillans biomass
|
Transparency of water (spring)
|
Transparency of water (summer)
|
Oxygen saturation in the surface water (spring)
|
Oxygen saturation in the surface water (summer)
|
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of tolerant macroalgae species biomass
|
Total projected cover of macroalgae tolerant species (lower infralittoral) |
Maximal depth distribution of Ericaria bosphorica (Cystoseira crinita f.bosphorica |
Maximal depth distribution of Gongolaria barbata(Cystoseira barbata
|
Maximal depth distribution of Phyllophora crispa and other sciophylic sensitive macroalgae (lower infralitoral) |
Proportion of sensitive macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species cover (Ecological index- EQR-cover) |
Total projected cover of macroalgae sensitive species of Phyllophora crispa and other sciophylic sensitive macroalgae (lower infralittoral) |
EQR M-AMBI(n)
|
Threshold value upper |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
1.0 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.12 |
3.4 |
1.5 |
30.0 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
116.0 |
110.0 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.68 |
|||||||
Threshold value lower |
3.4 |
1.5 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
105.0 |
95.0 |
0.644 |
0.6 |
0.644 |
0.664 |
||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.88 |
5.76 |
0.319 |
0.221 |
1.67 |
1.76 |
0.483 |
0.117 |
22.11 |
13.08 |
8.0 |
12.0 |
125.0 |
110.0 |
1.0 |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
0.22 |
0.13 |
0.095 |
0.06 |
0.3 |
0.36 |
0.079 |
0.056 |
0.37 |
0.1 |
2.5 |
1.0 |
94.0 |
100.0 |
0.32 |
|||||||||||||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
metre
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
percentage
|
Other
|
||
Value unit other |
EQR
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
|||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
44.0 |
24.0 |
72.0 |
53.0 |
1.0 |
57.0 |
94.0 |
94.0 |
94.0 |
33.0 |
96.0 |
64.0 |
99.0 |
63.0 |
63.0 |
63.0 |
63.0 |
40.0 |
42.9 |
||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
|||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Description parameter |
This indicator was not assessed, due to insufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to insufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on the results for some of the stations (polygons) monitored during the assessment period (not all stations (polygons) from the monitoring program have been assessed).
. |
The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on the results for some of the stations (polygons) monitored during the assessment period (not all stations (polygons) from the monitoring program have been assessed).
. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
Although specific proportion threshold is not set for D5C8, the proportion 42.9 % of the seabed over which the EQR threshold value set has been achieved is insufficient to reach the overall GES proportion threshold of 90 %. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
2012-2107 |
Related pressures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sozopol-Rezovo (BLK-BG-AA-MaslennosRezovo)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Chlorophyll-a |
Chlorophyll-a |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Transparency |
Transparency |
Oxygen saturation |
Oxygen saturation |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Element code |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
Combined_K |
Combined_K |
109921 |
QE3-1-1 |
QE3-1-1 |
EEA_3131-01-9 |
EEA_3131-01-9 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
|
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C2
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C4
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
D5C5
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C8
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
N-NH4 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NH4 concentration in the water (summer)
|
DIP concentration in the water (spring)
|
DIP concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (summer)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (spring)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (summer)
|
Number of potentially toxic species
|
Number of sequences of potentially toxic species
|
Noctiluca scintillans biomass
|
Transparency of water (spring)
|
Transparency of water (summer)
|
Oxygen saturation in the surface water (spring)
|
Oxygen saturation in the surface water (summer)
|
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of tolerant macroalgae species biomass
|
Total projected cover of macroalgae tolerant species (lower infralittoral) |
Maximal depth distribution of Ericaria bosphoric (Cystoseira crinita F.bosphorica |
Maximal depth distribution of Gongolaria barbata (Cystoseira barbata
|
Maximal depth distribution of Phyllophora crispa and other sciophylic sensitive macroalgae (lower infralitoral) |
Proportion of sensitive macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species cover (Ecological index- EQR-cover) |
Total projected cover of macroalgae sensitive species of Phyllophora crispa and other sciophylic sensitive macroalgae (lower infralittoral) |
EQR M-AMBI(n)
|
Threshold value upper |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
1.0 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.12 |
3.4 |
1.5 |
30.0 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
116.0 |
110.0 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.68 |
|||||||
Threshold value lower |
3.4 |
1.57 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
105.0 |
95.0 |
0.644 |
0.6 |
0.644 |
0.664 |
||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.45 |
0.4 |
0.166 |
0.188 |
0.43 |
0.36 |
0.088 |
0.068 |
1.89 |
8.0 |
13.0 |
117.0 |
109.0 |
1.0 |
||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
0.18 |
0.05 |
0.054 |
0.052 |
0.13 |
0.3 |
0.033 |
0.056 |
0.6 |
3.0 |
6.0 |
116.0 |
103.0 |
0.53 |
||||||||||||||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
metre
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
percentage
|
Other
|
||
Value unit other |
EQR
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
|||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
6.0 |
38.0 |
100.0 |
31.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
55.0 |
100.0 |
15.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
84.1 |
||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
|||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
No |
Description parameter |
This indicator was not assessed, due to insufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to insufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on the results for some of the stations (polygons) monitored during the assessment period (not all stations (polygons) from the monitoring program have been assessed).
. |
The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on the results for some of the stations (polygons) monitored during the assessment period (not all stations (polygons) from the monitoring program have been assessed).
. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
Although specific proportion threshold is not set for D5C8, the proportion 84.1 % of the seabed over which the EQR threshold value set has been achieved is insufficient to reach the overall GES proportion threshold of 90 %. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open sea (BLK-BG-AA-OpenSea)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Chlorophyll-a |
Chlorophyll-a |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Transparency |
Transparency |
Element code |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
Combined_K |
Combined_K |
109921 |
QE3-1-1 |
QE3-1-1 |
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C2
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C4
|
D5C4
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
N-NH4 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NH4 concentration in the water (summer)
|
DIP concentration in the water (spring)
|
DIP concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (summer)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (spring)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (summer)
|
Number of potentially toxic species
|
Number of sequences of potentially toxic species
|
Noctiluca scintillans biomass
|
Transparency of water (spring)
|
Transparency of water (summer)
|
Threshold value upper |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.1 |
0.08 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
0.08 |
0.08 |
0.4 |
0.36 |
30.0 |
10.0 |
13.0 |
||
Threshold value lower |
0.3 |
0.36 |
8.0 |
11.0 |
|||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.64 |
0.39 |
0.33 |
0.135 |
0.68 |
0.31 |
0.094 |
0.107 |
0.7 |
1.61 |
10.0 |
17.0 |
|||
Value achieved lower |
0.19 |
0.07 |
0.009 |
0.022 |
0.03 |
0.08 |
0.002 |
0.043 |
0.27 |
0.14 |
4.0 |
9.0 |
|||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
||
Value unit other |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
91.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
This parameter was not assessed due to insufficient spatial coverage during the assessed period. |
This parameter was not assessed due to insufficient spatial coverage during the assessed period. |
This parameter was not assessed due to insufficient spatial coverage during the assessed period |
This parameter was not assessed due to insufficient spatial coverage during the assessed period. |
This parameter was not assessed due to insufficient spatial coverage during the assessed period. |
||||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
|||||||||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|||||||||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shelf (BLK-BG-AA-Shelf)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Chlorophyll-a |
Chlorophyll-a |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Transparency |
Transparency |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Element code |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
Combined_K |
Combined_K |
109921 |
QE3-1-1 |
QE3-1-1 |
|
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C2
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C4
|
D5C4
|
D5C8
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
N-NH4 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NH4 concentration in the water (summer)
|
DIP concentration in the water (spring)
|
DIP concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (summer)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (spring) |
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (summer) |
Number of potentially toxic species
|
Number of sequences of potentially toxic species
|
Noctiluca scintillans biomass
|
Transparency of water (spring)
|
Transparency of water (summer)
|
EQR M-AMBI(n)
|
Threshold value upper |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.1 |
0.08 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
0.08 |
0.08 |
1.4 |
1.2 |
30.0 |
6.5 |
7.7 |
0.68 |
||
Threshold value lower |
1.4 |
1.2 |
5.8 |
6.5 |
||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
1.63 |
0.55 |
0.335 |
0.17 |
6.03 |
2.42 |
0.273 |
0.122 |
2.13 |
4.6 |
10.0 |
19.0 |
1.0 |
|||
Value achieved lower |
0.08 |
0.02 |
0.046 |
0.018 |
0.03 |
0.13 |
0.003 |
0.025 |
0.26 |
0.23 |
3.5 |
4.5 |
0.46 |
|||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
|||
Value unit other |
||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
62.0 |
96.0 |
21.0 |
63.0 |
47.0 |
71.0 |
59.0 |
63.0 |
97.0 |
5.0 |
71.0 |
90.4 |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Description parameter |
This parameter was not assessed due to insufficient spatial coverage during the assessed period |
This parameter was not assessed due to insufficient spatial coverage during the assessed period |
Although specific proportion threshold is not set for D5C8, the proportion 90.4 % of the seabed over which the EQR threshold value set has been achieved is sufficient to reach the overall GES proportion threshold of 90 %, if the other parameters were achieved too. |
|||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Description criteria |
||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Description element |
||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
||||||||||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sivriburun-Kaliakra (BLK-BG-AA-SivriburunKaliakra)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrate nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Dissolved nitrite nitrogen |
Chlorophyll-a |
Chlorophyll-a |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Molecular taxonomy of potentially toxic species |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Transparency |
Transparency |
Oxygen saturation |
Oxygen saturation |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Element code |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedAmoniumNitrogen |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedInorganicPhosphorus |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitrateNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
DissolvedNitriteNitrogen |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
Combined_K |
Combined_K |
109921 |
QE3-1-1 |
QE3-1-1 |
EEA_3131-01-9 |
EEA_3131-01-9 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-2-2 |
|
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C2
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C4
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
D5C5
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C6
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C8
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
N-NH4 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NH4 concentration in the water (summer)
|
DIP concentration in the water (spring)
|
DIP concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO3 concentration in the water (summer)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (spring)
|
N-NO2 concentration in the water (summer)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (spring)
|
Chlorophyll a concentration in the water (summer)
|
Number of potentially toxic species
|
Number of sequences of potentially toxic species
|
Noctiluca scintillans biomass
|
Transparency of water (spring)
|
Transparency of water (summer)
|
Oxygen saturation in the surface water (spring)
|
Oxygen saturation in the surface water (summer)
|
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of tolerant macroalgae species biomass
|
Total projected cover of macroalgae tolerant species (lower infralittoral) |
Maximal depth distribution of Ericaria bosphorica (Cystoseira crinitaf.bosphorica |
Maximal depth distribution of Gongolaria barbata (Cystoseira barbata
|
Maximal depth distribution of Phyllophora crispa and other sciophylic sensitive macroalgae (lower infralitoral) |
Proportion of sensitive macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species biomass |
Proportion of sensitive and tolerant macroalgae species cover (Ecological index- EQR-cover) |
Total projected cover of macroalgae sensitive species of Phyllophora crispa and other sciophylic sensitive macroalgae (lower infralittoral) |
EQR M-AMBI(n)
|
Threshold value upper |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
1.0 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.12 |
3.4 |
1.5 |
30.0 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
116.0 |
110.0 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.68 |
|||||||
Threshold value lower |
3.4 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
105.0 |
95.0 |
0.644 |
0.6 |
0.644 |
0.664 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
1.41 |
0.56 |
0.178 |
0.196 |
5.71 |
0.52 |
0.281 |
0.103 |
4.45 |
7.39 |
6.0 |
12.0 |
115.0 |
108.0 |
1.0 |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
0.48 |
0.23 |
0.109 |
0.058 |
0.76 |
0.05 |
0.187 |
0.047 |
0.62 |
0.26 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
100.0 |
104.0 |
0.34 |
|||||||||||||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
percentage
|
metre
|
metre
|
metre
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
percentage
|
Other
|
||
Value unit other |
EQR
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
|||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
87.2 |
100.0 |
86.0 |
90.0 |
15.0 |
49.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
84.0 |
19.0 |
100.0 |
96.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
75.0 |
65.8 |
||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% of stations achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
No |
Description parameter |
This indicator was not assessed, due to insufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to insufficient data. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on the results for some of the stations (polygons) monitored during the assessment period (not all stations (polygons) from the monitoring program have been assessed).
. |
The proportion of the MRU assessment is based only on the results for some of the stations (polygons) monitored during the assessment period (not all stations (polygons) from the monitoring program have been assessed).
. |
This parameter was not assessed due to unsufficient data. |
Although specific proportion threshold is not set for D5C8, the proportion 65.8 % of the seabed over which the EQR threshold value set has been achieved is insufficient to reach the overall GES proportion threshold of 90 %. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
TRIX and EQR M-AMBI(n) ecological indexes were used to integrate eutrophication indicators in the coastal MRUs. TRIX taking into consideration causes -nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and oxygen saturation) (Vollenweider et al. (1998)) and M-AMBI(n) (Sigovini et al., 2013) was used for assessing adverse effects on benthic macroinvertebrates. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|