There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 6 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is the circalittoral mud (59.6 % of the seabed). Three of the habitat types were in good status with adverse effects over 0.43 % - 19.29 %. In the rest three habitat types the adverse effects ranged over 28.81 % - 52.12 % of their total extent, therefore status was evaluated as not good. Advere effects resulted from the combined action of two main pressures - eutrophication and physical disturbance from fisheries. More considerable loss of 1.43 % was estimated for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=50% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which is circalittoral mud (70.9 % of the total seabed). The only habitat type that was in good status were the infralittoral coarse sediments with proportion of adverse effects over 16.3 % of its total extent. In the rest of the habitat types the adverse effects ranged between 36.1 % - 63.1 % of their total extent, therefore their status was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication. Insignificant habitat loss was determined for infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=20% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)

There are 5 representative broad habitat types of the seabed sediments, the most extensive of which are the circalittoral mud (66.7 % of the total seabed) and circalittoral mixed sediments (19.6 % of the total seabed). The extent of overall adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures ranged between 36.4 % and 81.5 % of the total extent of the habitat types. Therefore, the status of all habitats was assessed as not good. The predominant adverse effects resulted from eutrophication, apart from the circalittoral mixed sediments, where the main pressure was from physical disturbance from fisheries. Habitat loss < 1 % from the total habitat extent was evaluated for the infralittoral coarse sediments and the infralittoral sand. GES Extent Achieved=0% (GES Extent Threshold=100)