Member State report / Art13 / 2022 / D5 / Germany / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 13 Programme of measures (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2022-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D5 Eutrophication |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
| Reported by | Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz (BMUV) |
| Report date | 2022-06-30 |
| Report access | 363 |
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RegionSubregion |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Baltic Sea; NEA Greater North Sea |
Measure code |
DE-M401-UZ1-01 |
DE-M402-UZ1-02 |
DE-M435-UZ1-08 |
DE-M938-other |
DE-M001-WFD |
DE-M002-WFD |
DE-M003-WFD |
DE-M004-WFD |
DE-M005-WFD |
DE-M006-WFD |
DE-M007-WFD |
DE-M013-WFD |
DE-M014-WFD |
DE-M015-WFD |
DE-M027-WFD |
DE-M028-WFD |
DE-M029-WFD |
DE-M030-WFD |
DE-M031-WFD |
DE-M033-WFD |
DE-M041-WFD |
DE-M065-WFD |
DE-M093-WFD |
DE-M100-WFD |
DE-M403-UZ1-03 |
DE-M404-UZ1-04 |
DE-M405-UZ2-01 |
DE-M432-UZ1-05 |
DE-M433-UZ1-06 |
DE-M434-UZ1-07 |
DE-M436-UZ1-09 |
DE-M437-UZ1-10 |
DE-M440-UZ2-07 |
DE-M503-WFD |
DE-M504-WFD |
DE-M506-WFD |
DE-M507-WFD |
DE-M508-WFD |
DE-M901-other |
DE-M902-other |
DE-M929-other |
Measure old code |
ANSDE-M401-UZ1-01 |
ANSDE-M402-UZ1-02 |
ANSDE-M001-WFD; BALDE-M001-WFD |
ANSDE-M002-WFD; BALDE-M002-WFD |
ANSDE-M003-WFD; BALDE-M003-WFD |
ANSDE-M004-WFD; BALDE-M004-WFD |
ANSDE-M005-WFD; BALDE-M005-WFD |
ANSDE-M006-WFD; BALDE-M006-WFD |
ANSDE-M007-WFD; BALDE-M007-WFD |
ANSDE-M013-WFD; BALDE-M013-WFD |
ANSDE-M014-WFD; BALDE-M014-WFD |
ANSDE-M015-WFD; BALDE-M015-WFD |
ANSDE-M027-WFD; BALDE-M027-WFD |
ANSDE-M028-WFD; BALDE-M028-WFD |
ANSDE-M029-WFD; BALDE-M029-WFD |
ANSDE-M030-WFD; BALDE-M030-WFD |
ANSDE-M031-WFD; BALDE-M031-WFD |
ANSDE-M033-WFD; BALDE-M033-WFD |
ANSDE-M041-WFD; BALDE-M041-WFD |
ANSDE-M065-WFD; BALDE-M065-WFD |
ANSDE-M093-WFD; BALDE-M093-WFD |
ANSDE-M100-WFD; BALDE-M100-WFD |
ANSDE-M403-UZ1-03; BALDE-M403-UZ1-03 |
ANSDE-M404-UZ1-04; BALDE-M404-UZ1-04 |
ANSDE-M405-UZ2-01; BALDE-M405-UZ2-01 |
ANSDE-M503-WFD; BALDE-M503-WFD |
ANSDE-M504-WFD; BALDE-M504-WFD |
ANSDE-M506-WFD; BALDE-M506-WFD |
ANSDE-M507-WFD; BALDE-M507-WFD |
ANSDE-M508-WFD; BALDE-M508-WFD |
ANSDE-M901-other; BALDE-M901-other |
ANSDE-M902-other; BALDE-M902-other |
ANSDE-M929-other; BALDE-M929-other |
||||||||
Measure name |
Agricultural cooperation project to reduce direct inputs into coastal waters via drainage systems//Agricultural cooperation project on reducing direct inputs into coastal waters via drainage systems
|
Stärkung der Selbstreinigungskraft der Ästuare am Beispiel der Ems // Strengthening the assimilative capacity of estuaries, using the example of the river Ems |
Wiederherstellung und Erhalt von Seegraswiesen // Restoration and conservation of seagrass beds |
OSPAR Nordostatlantik-Umweltstrategie 2021-2030 // OSPAR North-East Atlantic Environment Strategy 2021-2030 |
Construction and extension of waste water treatment plants: New construction and adaptation of urban waste water treatment plants
|
Construction and extension of waste water treatment plants: Extension of urban waste water treatment plants to reduce nitrogen inputs
|
Construction and extension of waste water treatment plants: Extension of urban waste water treatment plants to reduce phosphorus inputs
|
Construction and extension of waste water treatment plants/Further waste water treatment: Extension of municipal waste water treatment plants to reduce other substances
|
Construction and extension of waste water treatment plants: Optimisation of the operation of urban waste water treatment plants
|
Construction and extension of waste water treatment plants: Inter-municipal mergers and decommissioning of existing waste water treatment plants
|
Construction and extension of waste water treatment plants: New construction and retrofitting of small sewage treatment plants
|
Extension and improvement of industrial waste water treatment plants (including agriculture): New construction and adaptation of industrial/commercial waste water treatment plants
|
Extension and improvement of industrial waste water treatment plants (including agriculture): Optimisation of the mode of operation of industrial/commercial waste water treatment plants
|
Extension and improvement of industrial waste water treatment plants (including agriculture): Other measures to reduce the input of substances from industrial/commercial waste water discharges
|
Reduction of nutrient pollution from agriculture, including implementation of the 2020 Fertiliser Regulation: Measures to reduce direct inputs of nutrients from agriculture
|
Measures to reduce soil erosion and run-off: Measures to reduce nutrient inputs by creating water protection strips
|
Measures to reduce soil erosion and run-off: Measures to reduce nutrient and fine material inputs through erosion and run-off from agriculture
|
Reduction of nutrient pollution from agriculture, including implementation of the 2020 Fertiliser Regulation: Measures to reduce nutrient inputs from agricultural leaching
|
Reduction of nutrient pollution from agriculture, including implementation of the 2020 Fertiliser Regulation: Measures to reduce nutrient inputs through drainage
|
Drinking water protection measures: Measures to reduce nutrient inputs through specific requirements in water protection areas
|
Reduction of nutrient pollution from agriculture, including implementation of the 2020 Fertiliser Regulation: Measures to reduce nutrient inputs into groundwater (GW) by leaching from agriculture
|
Natural water retention measures
|
Natural water retention measures: Measures to reduce pressures from land drainage
|
Reduction of nutrient pollution from agriculture, including implementation of the 2020 Fertiliser Regulation: Measures to reduce nutrient inputs through specific requirements in floodplains
|
Promoting sustainable NOx abatement measures in ships//Promoting sustainable measures to reduce NOx inputs from shipping
|
Einrichtung eines Stickstoff-Emissions-Sondergebietes (NECA) in Nord- und Ostsee unterstützen // Support the designation of a NECA in the North and Baltic Seas |
Criteria and incentive schemes for environmentally friendly ships//Criteria and incentive systems for environmentally friendly ships
|
Meeresrelevante Revision des Göteborg-Protokolls des Übereinkommens über weiträumige grenzüberschreitende Luftverunreinigungen (CLRTAP) insbesondere zur Minderung der atmosphärischen Einträge von NOx und Ammoniak // Revision of the Gothenburg Protocol to the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) as it relates to the seas, in particular with a view to reducing atmospheric inputs of NOx and ammonia
|
Meeresschutzrelevante Umsetzung des nationalen Luftreinhalteprogramms der Bundesrepublik Deutschland // Implementation of Germany’s National Air Pollution Control Programme as it relates to the seas |
Entwicklung von meeresrelevanten Zielwerten für die Minderung von Einträgen von Phosphor, Schadstoffen sowie Kunststoffen (inkl. Mikroplastik) am Übergabepunkt limnisch-marin, als Grundlage für die Bewirtschaftung der Flussgebietseinheiten gemäß WRRL // Development of ocean-related target values for reductions in inputs of phosphorus, contaminants and plastics (incl. microplastics) at the limnic-marine transition point, as a basis for the management of river basin districts in accordance with the WFD |
Pilot study on environmentally friendly handling techniques of fertilisers in ports//Pilot study of environmentally friendly ways of handling fertilisers in ports
|
Criteria, frameworks and practices for sustainable mariculture systems//Criteria, conditions and procedures for sustainable mariculture systems
|
Work towards a reduction in the discharge of cargo residues of solid bulk goods into the sea//Working towards a reduction in the discharge of cargo residues of solid bulk goods into the sea
|
Research and knowledge improvement to remove ambiguities: Information and training activities
|
Advisory measures for agriculture: Advisory measures
|
Advisory measures for agriculture: Voluntary cooperation
|
Advisory measures for agriculture: Certification systems
|
Research and knowledge improvement to remove ambiguities: In-depth investigations and controls
|
Implementation of MARPOL (Annexes IV and VI)//Implemenation of the MARPOL Convention (Annexes IV and VI)
|
Umsetzung der Genfer Luftreinhaltekonvention (Göteborg-Protokoll) // Implemenation of the Geneva Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) (Gothenburg Protocol) |
Integrated Coastal Zone Management//Integrated Coastal Zone Management
|
Measure description |
The measure focuses on the exemplary development of new agricultural advisory concepts and communication structures for the coastal regions draining directly into the North Sea via smaller sieves. This includes the establishment of bodies in the ‘Jade’ river basin’s example region, where representatives of agriculture, the Chamber of Agriculture, drainage associations, academia and advisory bodies advise on existing and, where appropriate, new approaches to action. The aim is to reduce nutrient inputs that do not enter the coastal waters through the large streams. Additional information can be obtained from the measure fiche: https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
The implementation of the measures through the ‘Master Plan Ems 2050’ (reduction of suspended solid content) and EAFRD Development Programme ‘PFEIL’ (restoration of good environmental status) is on track and is expected to be completed by 2050. Additional information can be obtained from the measure fiche: https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
The measure provides for the restoration of seagrass populations and the restoration and conservation of these natural habitats in the transitional and coastal waters as a contribution to denitrification. A pilot project in the field of outdoor Ems is initially planned. As a first step, a dynamic model system will be developed to allow the development of seagrass beds to be taken into account in management decisions in the future. Additional information can be obtained from the measure fiches: https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
Across all objectives, the North-East Atlantic Environmental Strategy, updated to implement the OSPAR Convention, contributes to the achievement of the objectives of the MSFD in the sense of a Category 1b measure, while continuing existing OSPAR measures. The inclusion of regional measures, plans and programmes in the national programme of measures does not alter their legal nature. The effectiveness of the measure is measured through the MSFD environmental indicators. Specific indicators may exist within the framework of the policy implementing the action and may be used to assess effectiveness. //Indicators: The actions of NEAES are linked to the OSPAR indicator system, which captures the impact of the measures (https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/cross-cutting-issues/ospar-common-indicators). The indicator system is constantly evolving.
|
The measure contains several components to reduce nitrogen emissions from seagoing vessels: 1. Supporting the demand for NOx reduction technologies. 2. Supporting demand for sustainable alternative fuels and propulsion technologies. 3. External electricity supply to seagoing vessels in ports. 4. Concepts on emission-based port charges. The NOx Fund component included in the measure notified in 2016 was withdrawn when the programme was updated due to a lack of sufficient support at EU level. //To CEA, CBA: A socio-economic pre-assessment was carried out in 2015. A further impact assessment, including cost-benefit analysis, will be carried out, where appropriate, using the separate test scheme for socio-economic evaluation (https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
The action consists of supporting the completion and submission of NECA applications by the North Sea and Baltic Sea riparian States to the IMO. Additional information can be obtained from the measure fiche: https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
The action has two components: 1. Environmental criteria (of the Blue Angel or any other ambitious eco-label) should be taken into account whenever possible in the case of new acquisition and operation of public and state-supported seagoing vessels, such as research vessels. These ships should serve as a model for promoting higher environmental standards in shipping. 2. Develop a model for an inclusive and internationally operational incentive system that incorporates the requirements for clean waterborne transport, is applicable to all types of ships in maritime transport and contributes to the internalisation of external costs of transport modes. Additional information can be obtained from the measure fiches: https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
The Gothenburg Protocol’s reduction commitments so far aim solely at reducing the health effects of certain pollutants (fine particulate matter SO2, NOX, NH3 and VOC) and reducing their effects on terrestrial systems. The Protocol is currently under review. The MSFD measure aims to integrate marine protection concerns into the review process for the first time. Additional information can be obtained from the measure fiches: https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
The national air pollution control programme of the Federal Republic of Germany (NLRP) describes the further measures necessary to comply with the emission reduction commitments under the NEC-RL (EU) 2016/2284 for air pollutants NOX, SO2, NH3, PM2.5 and NMVOC by 2030. The maritime implementation of the NLRP results from Germany’s situation on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea, in principle without further specification of the measures contained. As part of the proposed MSFD measure, a regionally or temporally prioritised implementation of measures of the NLRP to reduce NH3 and NOX emissions will be considered with regard to marine protection. Additional information can be obtained from the measure fiches: https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
The identification of target loads of phosphorus at the inland/marine transfer point is a crucial basis in the eutrophication context in order to develop and implement inland marine-related mitigation needs and measures. The measure is implemented in cooperation with those responsible for the MSFD and WFD action planning. The OSPAR North-East Atlantic Environmental Strategy identifies country-specific maximum nutrient inputs. The measure under the MSFD is intended solely to derive the objectives. The development of target values (and associated indicators) for inputs of phosphorus, selected pollutants and plastics (including microplastics) at the transfer point in inland/marine is the subject of the action. Additional information can be obtained from the measure fiches: https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
The measure aims at applying best available transhipment techniques (BAT/BEP) in model ports in the North Sea and Baltic Sea when loading unpacked fertilisers. The aim is to draw from experience recommendations for optimising operations in ports in order to improve the proper handling of unpackaged fertilisers and to avoid losses to water. It is possible to initiate a discussion on OSPAR and HELCOM-wide approaches with the action. Additional information can be obtained from the measure fiches: https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
The action aims at developing criteria, framework conditions and practices based on Best Available Techniques and Best Environmental Practice (BAT/BEP), which serve as a guide for future-oriented environmentally friendly mariculture and a guide to licensing practices. In addition, in order to support the implementation of these guidelines and the development and implementation of BAT/BEP, the development of environmentally friendly and innovative methods in mariculture will be encouraged. The implementation of the measures provides for dialogue at regional level (HELCOM/OSPAR) and between environmental and aquaculture experts. The development of indicators is part of the operationalisation of the action. Additional information can be obtained from the measure fiches: https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
The measure relates to solid bulk goods and covers both damage and nutrients. Among other things, a study will identify necessary measures and policy options to ensure the acceptance of cargo residues in ports handling bulk cargo. Based on this, any need for further specification or amendment of MARPOL Annex V must be identified. Additional information can be obtained from the measure fiches: https://www.meeresschutz.info/berichte-art13.html?file
|
The international MARPOL Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of 1973 contains 20 articles of general obligations for States Parties, procedural instructions and basic rules. The practically relevant provisions for the prevention of pollution of the marine environment in relation to the various types of ship-related waste are set out in Annexes I to VI. The following apply here: — Annex IV: Prevention of pollution by waste water from ships – Annex VI: Rules for the prevention of air pollution from seagoing ships www.bsh.de/de/Meeresdaten/Umweltschutz/MARPOL_Uebereinkommen/index.jsp
|
The Gothenburg Protocol is part of the United Nations World Economic Commission (UNECE) Geneva Convention on Air Pollution. The Protocol considers the interaction of pollutants and is therefore also referred to as a multi-component protocol. The aim is to combat acidification, eutrophication and the formation of ground-level ozone. To this end, the Protocol contains numerous provisions on emission reduction, monitoring, reporting, etc. and national emission ceilings (NECs) for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, ammonia and volatile organic compounds (NEC Directive (EU) 2016/2284). It was adopted in 1999 and entered into force in 2005.
|
Spatial planning tool to systematically coordinate usage claims in the coastal zone and its development. ICZM is guided by sustainability criteria and considers the sea and land side of coastal areas as a functional unit. The effectiveness of the measure is measured through the MSFD environmental indicators. Specific indicators may exist within the framework of the policy implementing the action and may be used to assess effectiveness. //Indicators: The effectiveness of the measure is measured through the MSFD environmental indicators. Specific indicators may exist within the framework of the policy implementing the action and may be used to assess effectiveness.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Update type |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure modified since 2015 PoM |
Measure same as in 2015 PoM |
Measure modified since 2015 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Measure category |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.b |
Category 2.b |
Category 1.b (non-WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.b |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.a |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.b (WFD) |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.a |
Category 1.b (non-WFD) |
Policy conventions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policy national |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Responsible competent authority |
NI-MU |
NI-MU |
MU-NI |
HB-SKUMS, BMDV, BMUV, HH-BUKEA, MV-LM, NI-MU, SH-MELUND |
BMDV, BMUV |
BMUV, HB-SKUMS, MV-LM, NI-MU, SH-MELUND |
BMUV, SH-MELUND |
BMUV, SH-MELUND |
BMUV, BMDV, HH-BUKEA, MV-LM, NI-MU, SH-MELUND |
BMUV, MV-LM |
SH-MELUND, BMUV, MV-LM |
BMDV, BMUV, MV-LM, MU-NI, SH-MELUND |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Responsible organisation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coordination level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEA |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Not needed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEA reference |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBA |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Not needed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBA reference |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measure purpose |
Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity) |
Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity) |
Directly restores a species or habitat(s) |
Indirectly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by governance mechanisms, financial incentives, awareness campaigns) |
Indirectly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by governance mechanisms, financial incentives, awareness campaigns) |
Indirectly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by governance mechanisms, financial incentives, awareness campaigns) |
Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity) |
Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity) |
Improve knowledge base (e.g. by research or one-off surveys) |
Indirectly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by governance mechanisms, financial incentives, awareness campaigns) |
Indirectly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by governance mechanisms, financial incentives, awareness campaigns) |
Improve knowledge base (e.g. by research or one-off surveys); Indirectly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by governance mechanisms, financial incentives, awareness campaigns) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant KTMs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GEScomponent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Temporal scope |
2016-2022 |
2015-2050 |
2030 |
2016-2027 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2027 |
vor 2015 |
2020 |
2030 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implementation status |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Measure implemented |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Measure implemented |
Implementation started |
Implementation started |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Implementation started |
Measure implemented |
Measure implemented |
Implementation started |
|||||||
Implementation delay |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||
Implementation reason |
Other |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
Technical implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
||||||||||||||
Progress description |
The measure has been fully implemented with the NECA facility by the IMO in October 2016. The related TIER III NOX standards in accordance with MARPOL Annex VI apply only to new ships and as of 1 January 2021.
|
Measures are under way to raise awareness of Blue Engel certification. Studies have also been carried out describing the design of a possible incentive system.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reason description |
Das Projekt war im Wesentlichen auf die örtliche Kooperation, d.h. Kommunikation mit aktiven Landwirten angelegt. Aufgrund der COVID-19-Pandemie war dies nur sehr eingeschränkt möglich. Dadurch konnten die landwirtschaftlichen Handlungsoptionen für die verschiedenen naturräumlichen Gebiete (Marsch, Moor, Geest) noch nicht abschließend diskutiert und ausdifferenziert werden.
|
Die Maßnahmenumsetzung ist komplex und erfolgt ggf. in Stufen. Die konkrete Zeitplanung ergibt sich aus dem Maßnahmenkennblatt. Zur Umsetzung: Die Umsetzung aller Maßnahmenkomponenten wurde begonnen. Förderungen für die Einführung und/oder Unterstützung von Nachrüstprogrammen wurden bislang in zwei nationalen Aufrufen 2018 und 2020 vergeben. Der Ausbau landseitiger und mobiler LNG-Infrastruktur in Häfen wird seit 2018 bezuschusst. Für die Einführung eines europäischen NOX-Fonds fehlt es derzeit auf EU-Ebene an Unterstützung. Im Rahmen der Fortschreibung der Maßnahme wurde der Titel der Maßnahme, wie hier wiedergegeben, angepasst. Zudem wurde eine neue Teilkomponente entworfen und aufgenommen, welche zusätzliche sich zurzeit in der Entwicklung befindende Kraftstoffe und Antriebstechnologien in der Schifffahrt, die zur Zielerreichung der Maßnahme beitragen, berücksichtigt.
|