MS/Art8/2018/D5/Germany/NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea — Marine Information System for Europe

Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D5 / Germany / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due	2018-10-15
GES Descriptor	D5 Eutrophication
Member State	Germany
Region/subregion	NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Reported by	Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit
Report date	2020-02-17
Report access	DE_ART8_GES.xml

EF12 (ANSDE_D5_EF12)

Simplified table

GES component	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5
Feature	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication
Element	DIN	DIP	Chlorophyll-a	Phaeocystis spp.	Dissolved oxygen	Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae	Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities	Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities
Element code	TDIN	PHOS	EEA_3164-01-0	115088	EEA_3132-01-2	QE1-2-1	QE1-2-2	QE1-3
Element code source	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	National	National	National	OSPAR	National	EU	EU	EU
Criterion	D5C1	D5C1	D5C2	D5C3	D5C5	D5C6	D5C7	D5C8
Parameter	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Other	Concentration in water	Other	Other	Other
Parameter other				Cell numbers		As used in WFD	As used in WFD	As used in WFD
Threshold value upper	18.3	0.7	7.5	1000000.0	6.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC)	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	51.2	1.33	20.5	4613765.0	7.7
Value achieved lower	31.46	1.04	8.91	34649.0	3.11
Value unit				Other
Value unit other				Cell numbers per litre
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved								47.2331
Proportion threshold value unit								% area of MRU achieving threshold value
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes
Description parameter	In the third application of OSPAR Common Procedure, total nitrogen concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.	In the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, total phosphorus concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.	For chlorophyll-a, the 90th percentile was used for the assessment in line with the procedure in the WFD.		Only the minima are reported for oxygen. During the 3rd application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the mean values of oxygen concentrations were also assessed.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) has been used. The WFD biological quality element, macropyten, was used for the evaluation. This includes both macrophytes and opportunistic macroalgae.	The assessment period (2007-2012) of the last WFD RBMP (2015-) has been used. The biological quality element macropyen of the WFD was used for the assessment. This includes both macrophyte and opportunistic macroalgae.
Related indicator	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Concentrations of Chlorophyll-a in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas Chlorophyllkonzentrationen	Trends in Blooms of the Nuisance Phytoplankton Species Phaeocystis in Belgian, Dutch and German Waters Artenverschiebung in der Florazusammensetzung	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Sauerstoffkonzentration
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Good
Description criteria						http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/	http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/	http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Good
Description element	The evaluation period is 2006-2014.	The evaluation period is 2006-2014.	The evaluation period is 2006-2014.	The evaluation period is 2006-2014.	The evaluation period is 2006-2014.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) of the 2015 RBMP was taken into account. The WFD biological quality element, macropyten, was used for the evaluation. This includes both macrophytes and opportunistic macroalgae.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) of the 2015 RBMP was taken into account. The WFD biological quality element, macropyten, was used for the evaluation. This includes both macrophyte and opportunistic macroalgae.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) of the 2015 RBMP was taken into account.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.
GES extent threshold	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status	With regard to the WFD prefill, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed and reported under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessments under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefill, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed and reported under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessments under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefill, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed and reported under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessments under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefill, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed and reported under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessments under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefill, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed and reported under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessments under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefill, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed and reported under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessments under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefill, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed and reported under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessments under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefill, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed and reported under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessments under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.
Assessments period	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014
Related pressures	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
Related targets	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3

ANSDE_D5_EF34

Simplified table

GES component	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5
Feature	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication
Element	DIN	DIP	Chlorophyll-a	Phaeocystis spp.	Dissolved oxygen	Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae	Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities	Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities
Element code	TDIN	PHOS	EEA_3164-01-0	115088	EEA_3132-01-2	QE1-2-1	QE1-2-2	QE1-3
Element code source	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	National	National	National	OSPAR	National	EU	EU	EU
Criterion	D5C1	D5C1	D5C2	D5C3	D5C5	D5C6	D5C7	D5C8
Parameter	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Other	Concentration in water	Other	Other	Other
Parameter other				Cell numbers		As used in WFD	As used in WFD	As used in WFD
Threshold value upper	27.5	0.79	11.0	1000000.0	6.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	OSPAR Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	76.41	1.46	16.26	8187196.0	8.2
Value achieved lower	47.25	1.15	8.2	25194.0	4.6
Value unit				Other
Value unit other				Cell numbers per litre
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit								% area of MRU achieving threshold value
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	No	No	No	No	Unknown	No	No	No
Description parameter	In the third application of OSPAR Common Procedure, total nitrogen concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.	In the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, total phosphorus concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.	For chlorophyll-a, the 90th percentile was used for the assessment in line with the procedure in the WFD.		Only the minima are reported for oxygen. During the 3rd application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the mean values of oxygen concentrations were also assessed.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) has been used. The WFD biological quality element, macropyten, was used for the evaluation. This includes both macrophytes and opportunistic macroalgae.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) has been used. The WFD biological quality element, macropyten, was used for the evaluation. This includes both macrophytes and opportunistic macroalgae.
Related indicator	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Concentrations of Chlorophyll-a in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas Chlorophyllkonzentrationen	Trends in Blooms of the Nuisance Phytoplankton Species Phaeocystis in Belgian, Dutch and German Waters Artenverschiebung in der Florazusammensetzung	Concentrations of Dissolved Oxygen Near the Seafloor Sauerstoffkonzentration
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good
Description criteria				For criterion D5C3, only Phaeocystis may be reported here. During the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the indicator species Dinophysis, Prorocentrum and Pseudo-nitzschia were assessed in addition.	The criterion could not be assessed due to a lack of measured data.	http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/	http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/	http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good
Description element	The evaluation period is 2006-2014.	The evaluation period is 2006-2014.	The evaluation period is 2006-2014.	The evaluation period is 2006-2014.				The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) of the 2015 RBMP was taken into account.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.
GES extent threshold	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates was used. The quality element macrophytes was not included in the prefill, although macrophytes were assessed under the WFD. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and of harmful algal blooms for D5C3.
Assessments period	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014
Related pressures	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
Related targets	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3

EW34 (ANSDE_D5_EW34)

Simplified table

GES component	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5
Feature	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication
Element	DIN	DIP	Chlorophyll-a	Phaeocystis spp.	Dissolved oxygen	Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae	Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities	Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities
Element code	TDIN	PHOS	EEA_3164-01-0	115088	EEA_3132-01-2	QE1-2-1	QE1-2-2	QE1-3
Element code source	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	OSPAR	OSPAR	EU	OSPAR	National	EU	EU	EU
Criterion	D5C1	D5C1	D5C2	D5C3	D5C5	D5C6	D5C7	D5C8
Parameter	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Other	Concentration in water	Other	Other	Other
Parameter other				Cell numbers per litre		As used in WFD	As used in WFD	As used in WFD
Threshold value upper	29.1	0.81	11.0	1000000.0	6.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	78.38	1.68	52.26	5955357.0	7.71
Value achieved lower	39.26	1.2	18.71	113778.0	5.18
Value unit				Other
Value unit other				Cell numbers per litre
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved								46.031
Proportion threshold value unit						% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	No	No	No	No	Yes	No	No	No
Description parameter	In the OSPAR Common Procedure, in addition to DIN, the ratio was also TN and the DIN/DIP.	In the OSPAR Common Procedure, in addition to the IAS, TP and the DIN/DIP were assessed.	For chlorophyll-a, the 90th percentile was used for the assessment in line with the procedure in the WFD.			The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) has been used. The WFD biological quality element, macropyten, was used for the evaluation. This includes both macrophytes and opportunistic macroalgae.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) has been used. The WFD biological quality element, macropyten, was used for the evaluation. This includes both macrophytes and opportunistic macroalgae.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) has been used.
Related indicator	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Concentrations of Chlorophyll-a in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas Chlorophyllkonzentrationen	Trends in Blooms of the Nuisance Phytoplankton Species Phaeocystis in Belgian, Dutch and German Waters Artenverschiebung in der Florazusammensetzung	Concentrations of Dissolved Oxygen Near the Seafloor Sauerstoffkonzentration
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good
Description criteria						http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/	http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/	http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good
Description element			The evaluation is based on the period 2006-2014.	The evaluation period is 2006-2014.	The evaluation is based on the period 2006-2014.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) of the 2015 RBMP was taken into account.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) of the 2015 RBMP was taken into account.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) of the 2015 RBMP was taken into account.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.
GES extent threshold	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).
Assessments period	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014
Related pressures	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
Related targets	UZN1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3

ICEF (ANSDE_D5_ICEF)

Simplified table

GES component	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5
Feature	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication
Element	DIN	DIP	Chlorophyll-a	Phaeocystis spp.	Photic limit	Dissolved oxygen	Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities
Element code	TDIN	PHOS	EEA_3164-01-0	115088	EEA_3111-01-1	EEA_3132-01-2	QE1-3
Element code source	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	National	National	National	OSPAR	National	National	National
Criterion	D5C1	D5C1	D5C2	D5C3	D5C4	D5C5	D5C8
Parameter	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Other	Transparency in water	Concentration in water	Other
Parameter other				Cell numbers per litre			Not specified
Threshold value upper	13.1	0.65	2.57	1000000.0	5.7	6.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	Other (specify)	OSPAR Convention
Threshold value source other					National
Value achieved upper	21.79	1.03	4.45		5.04	7.12
Value achieved lower	7.75	0.46	1.99		3.9	5.81
Value unit				Other
Value unit other				Cell numbers per litre
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unknown	No	Yes	Not assessed
Description parameter	In the third application of OSPAR Common Procedure, total nitrogen concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.	In the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, total phosphorus concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.		The parameter could not be assessed due to the lack of measured values.		Only the minima are reported for oxygen. During the 3rd application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the mean values of oxygen concentrations were also assessed.
Related indicator	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Concentrations of Chlorophyll-a in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas Chlorophyllkonzentrationen	Trends in Blooms of the Nuisance Phytoplankton Species Phaeocystis in Belgian, Dutch and German Waters Artenverschiebung in der Florazusammensetzung	Sichttiefe	Concentrations of Dissolved Oxygen Near the Seafloor Sauerstoffkonzentration
Criteria status	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Not good	Good	Not assessed
Description criteria				For criterion D5C3, only Phaeocystis may be reported here. During the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the indicator species Dinophysis, Prorocentrum and Pseudo-nitzschia were assessed in addition.			One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Element status	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Not good	Good	Not assessed
Description element							One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.
GES extent threshold	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed
Description overall status	The status of ICEF could not be determined because data on D5C3 and the basis for assessment for D5C8 are missing (OSPAR potential problem area).	The status of ICEF could not be determined because data on D5C3 and the basis for assessment for D5C8 are missing (OSPAR potential problem area).	The status of ICEF could not be determined because data on D5C3 and the basis for assessment for D5C8 are missing (OSPAR potential problem area).	The status of ICEF could not be determined because data on D5C3 and the basis for assessment for D5C8 are missing (OSPAR potential problem area).	The status of ICEF could not be determined because data on D5C3 and the basis for assessment for D5C8 are missing (OSPAR potential problem area).	The status of ICEF could not be determined because data on D5C3 and the basis for assessment for D5C8 are missing (OSPAR potential problem area).	The status of ICEF could not be determined because data on D5C3 and the basis for assessment for D5C8 are missing (OSPAR potential problem area).
Assessments period	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014
Related pressures	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
Related targets	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3

ICNF (ANSDE_D5_ICNF)

Simplified table

GES component	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5
Feature	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication
Element	DIN	DIP	Chlorophyll-a	Phaeocystis spp.	Photic limit	Dissolved oxygen	Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities
Element code	TDIN	PHOS	EEA_3164-01-0	115088	EEA_3111-01-1	EEA_3132-01-2	QE1-3
Element code source	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Criterion	D5C1	D5C1	D5C2	D5C3	D5C4	D5C5	D5C8
Parameter	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Other	Transparency in water	Concentration in water	Other
Parameter other				Cell numbers per litre			Not specified
Threshold value upper	19.0	0.71	3.66	1000000.0	4.1	6.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	Other (specify)	OSPAR Convention
Threshold value source other					National
Value achieved upper	39.76	1.14	8.89	4579565.0	3.82	3.82
Value achieved lower	20.26	0.85	3.62	827.0	2.64	2.64
Value unit				Other
Value unit other				Cell numbers per litre
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	No	No	No	Yes	No	No	Not assessed
Description parameter	In the third application of OSPAR Common Procedure, total nitrogen concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.	In the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, total phosphorus concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.				Only the minima are reported for oxygen. During the 3rd application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the mean values of oxygen concentrations were also assessed.
Related indicator	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Concentrations of Chlorophyll-a in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas Chlorophyllkonzentrationen	Trends in Blooms of the Nuisance Phytoplankton Species Phaeocystis in Belgian, Dutch and German Waters Artenverschiebung in der Florazusammensetzung	Sichttiefe	Concentrations of Dissolved Oxygen Near the Seafloor Sauerstoffkonzentration
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not assessed
Description criteria				For criterion D5C3, only Phaeocystis may be reported here. During the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the indicator species Dinophysis, Prorocentrum and Pseudo-nitzschia were assessed in addition.			One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not assessed
Description element							One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.
GES extent threshold	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
Assessments period	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014
Related pressures	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
Related targets	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3

NF12 (ANSDE_D5_NF12)

Simplified table

GES component	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5
Feature	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication
Element	DIN	DIP	Chlorophyll-a	Phaeocystis spp.	Dissolved oxygen	Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae	Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities	Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities
Element code	TDIN	PHOS	EEA_3164-01-0	115088	EEA_3132-01-2	QE1-2-1	QE1-2-2	QE1-3
Element code source	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	OSPAR	OSPAR	EU	OSPAR	National	EU	EU	EU
Criterion	D5C1	D5C1	D5C2	D5C3	D5C5	D5C6	D5C7	D5C8
Parameter	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Other	Concentration in water	Other	Other	Other
Parameter other				Cell numbers per litre		As used in WFD	As used in WFD	As used in WFD
Threshold value upper	20.2	0.72	7.5	1000000.0	6.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	38.51	1.28	16.77	4991387.0	8.3
Value achieved lower	9.4	0.69	10.43	82206.0	5.25
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved						77.9714	77.9714	22.0286
Proportion threshold value unit						% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Description parameter	In the OSPAR Common Procedure, in addition to DIN, the ratio was also TN and the DIN/DIP.	In the OSPAR Common Procedure, in addition to the IAS, TP and the DIN/DIP were assessed.	For chlorophyll-a, the 90th percentile was used for the assessment in line with the procedure in the WFD.			The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) has been used. The WFD biological quality element, macropyten, was used for the evaluation. This includes both macrophytes and opportunistic macroalgae.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) has been used. The WFD biological quality element, macropyten, was used for the evaluation. This includes both macrophytes and opportunistic macroalgae.
Related indicator	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Concentrations of Chlorophyll-a in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas Chlorophyllkonzentrationen	Trends in Blooms of the Nuisance Phytoplankton Species Phaeocystis in Belgian, Dutch and German Waters Artenverschiebung in der Florazusammensetzung	Concentrations of Dissolved Oxygen Near the Seafloor Sauerstoffkonzentration
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good
Description criteria						http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/	http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/	http://wasserblick.net/servlet/is/148547/
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good
Description element			The evaluation is based on the period 2006-2014.	The evaluation is based on the period 2006-2014.	The evaluation is based on the period 2006-2014.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) of the 2015 RBMP was taken into account.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) of the 2015 RBMP was taken into account.	The assessment period of the last WFD evaluation cycle (2007-2012) of the 2015 RBMP was taken into account.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle has been applied between criteria D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8.
GES extent threshold	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).	With regard to the WFD prefills, only the biological quality element of benthic invertebrates, macrophes and angiosperms was used. For the MSFD, the WFD assessment was used for macrophytes, with the same assessment result being used for D5C6 and D5C7 because the WFD quality element assessed both opportunistic macroalgae and macrophytes. For the quality element phytoplankton, the prefill was not used due to separate assessment under the MSFD of Chlorophyll-A concentrations for D5C2 and harmful algal bloom D5C3. The prefill for nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations was not used as the assessment period of the WFD differs from the MSFD period. The 2006-2014 period has been used as the basis for the MSFD evaluation. In addition, the thresholds of GES have changed. The MSFD evaluation uses the new GES limits of the 2016 OGewV (water protection ordinance).
Assessments period	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014
Related pressures	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
Related targets	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3

OCEF (ANSDE_D5_OCEF)

Simplified table

GES component	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5
Feature	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication
Element	DIN	DIP	Chlorophyll-a	Phaeocystis spp.	Photic limit	Dissolved oxygen	Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities
Element code	TDIN	PHOS	EEA_3164-01-0	115088	EEA_3111-01-1	EEA_3132-01-2	QE1-3
Element code source	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Criterion	D5C1	D5C1	D5C2	D5C3	D5C4	D5C5	D5C8
Parameter	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Other	Transparency in water	Concentration in water	Other
Parameter other				Cell numbers per litre			Not specified
Threshold value upper	10.0	0.62	1.95	1000000.0	7.3	6.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	Other (specify)	OSPAR Convention
Threshold value source other					National
Value achieved upper	10.96	0.6	3.39	1078083.0	7.41	7.35
Value achieved lower	6.39	0.35	1.11	160066.0	5.28	5.28
Value unit				Other
Value unit other				Cell numbers per litre
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Not assessed
Description parameter	In the third application of OSPAR Common Procedure, total nitrogen concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.	In the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, total phosphorus concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.				Only the minima are reported for oxygen. During the 3rd application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the mean values of oxygen concentrations were also assessed.
Related indicator	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Concentrations of Chlorophyll-a in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas Chlorophyllkonzentrationen	Trends in Blooms of the Nuisance Phytoplankton Species Phaeocystis in Belgian, Dutch and German Waters Artenverschiebung in der Florazusammensetzung	Sichttiefe	Concentrations of Dissolved Oxygen Near the Seafloor Sauerstoffkonzentration
Criteria status	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Not assessed
Description criteria				For criterion D5C3, only Phaeocystis may be reported here. During the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the indicator species Dinophysis, Prorocentrum and Pseudo-nitzschia were assessed in addition.			One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Element status	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Not assessed
Description element							One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.
GES extent threshold	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed
Description overall status	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).
Assessments period	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014
Related pressures	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
Related targets	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3

OCNF (ANSDE_D5_OCNF)

Simplified table

GES component	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5
Feature	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication
Element	DIN	DIP	Chlorophyll-a	Phaeocystis spp.	Photic limit	Dissolved oxygen	Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities
Element code	TDIN	PHOS	EEA_3164-01-0	115088	EEA_3111-01-1	EEA_3132-01-2	QE1-3
Element code source	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Criterion	D5C1	D5C1	D5C2	D5C3	D5C4	D5C5	D5C8
Parameter	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Other	Transparency in water	Concentration in water	Other
Parameter other				Cell numbers per litre			Not specified
Threshold value upper	9.1	0.61	1.79	1000000.0	7.9	6.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	Other (specify)	OSPAR Convention
Threshold value source other					National
Value achieved upper	12.77	0.79	3.12	484715.0	7.4	7.66
Value achieved lower	1.73	0.32	1.13	5449.0	4.88	5.0
Value unit				Other
Value unit other				Cell numbers per litre
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unknown	No	Yes	Not assessed
Description parameter	In the third application of OSPAR Common Procedure, total nitrogen concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.	In the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, total phosphorus concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.		Due to insufficient data, an assessment of criterion D5C3 was not possible.		Only the minima are reported for oxygen. During the 3rd application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the mean values of oxygen concentrations were also assessed.
Related indicator	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Concentrations of Chlorophyll-a in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas Chlorophyllkonzentrationen	Trends in Blooms of the Nuisance Phytoplankton Species Phaeocystis in Belgian, Dutch and German Waters Artenverschiebung in der Florazusammensetzung	Sichttiefe	Concentrations of Dissolved Oxygen Near the Seafloor Sauerstoffkonzentration
Criteria status	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Not good	Good	Not assessed
Description criteria				For criterion D5C3, only Phaeocystis may be reported here. During the 3rd application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the indicator species Dinophysis, Prorocentrum and Pseudo-nitzschia were assessed in addition. Due to insufficient data, an assessment of criterion D5C3 was not possible.			One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Element status	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Not good	Good	Not assessed
Description element				Due to insufficient data, an assessment of criterion D5C3 was not possible.			One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.
GES extent threshold	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed
Description overall status	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).	Due to the poor data available, no final assessment could be made for the OCEF (OSPAR potential problem area).
Assessments period	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014
Related pressures	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
Related targets	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3

OFFI (ANSDE_D5_OFFI)

Simplified table

GES component	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5
Feature	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication
Element	DIN	DIP	Chlorophyll-a	Phaeocystis spp.	Photic limit	Dissolved oxygen	Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities
Element code	TDIN	PHOS	EEA_3164-01-0	115088	EEA_3111-01-1	EEA_3132-01-2	QE1-3
Element code source	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Criterion	D5C1	D5C1	D5C2	D5C3	D5C4	D5C5	D5C8
Parameter	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Other	Transparency in water	Concentration in water	Other
Parameter other				Cell numbers per litre			Not specified
Threshold value upper	7.8	0.6	1.48	1000000.0	9.4	6.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	Other (specify)	OSPAR Convention
Threshold value source other					National
Value achieved upper	7.11	0.6	1.83	15925.0	11.5	6.63
Value achieved lower	3.03	0.39	0.37		4.86	5.19
Value unit				Other
Value unit other				Cell numbers per litre
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	No	Not assessed
Description parameter	In the third application of OSPAR Common Procedure, total nitrogen concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.	In the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, total phosphorus concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.		Due to insufficient data, an assessment of criterion D5C3 was not possible.		Only the minima are reported for oxygen. During the 3rd application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the mean values of oxygen concentrations were also assessed.
Related indicator	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Concentrations of Chlorophyll-a in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas Chlorophyllkonzentrationen	Trends in Blooms of the Nuisance Phytoplankton Species Phaeocystis in Belgian, Dutch and German Waters Artenverschiebung in der Florazusammensetzung	Sichttiefe	Concentrations of Dissolved Oxygen Near the Seafloor Sauerstoffkonzentration
Criteria status	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Good	Not good	Not assessed
Description criteria				For criterion D5C3, only Phaeocystis may be reported here. During the 3rd application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the indicator species Dinophysis, Prorocentrum and Pseudo-nitzschia were assessed in addition. Due to insufficient data, an assessment of criterion D5C3 was not possible.			One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Element status	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Good	Not good	Not assessed
Description element				Due to insufficient data, an assessment of criterion D5C3 was not possible.			One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.
GES extent threshold	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
Assessments period	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014
Related pressures	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
Related targets	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3

OFFO (ANSDE_D5_OFFO)

Simplified table

GES component	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5	D5
Feature	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Eutrophication
Element	DIN	DIP	Chlorophyll-a	Phaeocystis spp.	Photic limit	Dissolved oxygen	Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities
Element code	TDIN	PHOS	EEA_3164-01-0	115088	EEA_3111-01-1	EEA_3132-01-2	QE1-3
Element code source	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Criterion	D5C1	D5C1	D5C2	D5C3	D5C4	D5C5	D5C8
Parameter	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Other	Transparency in water	Concentration in water	Other
Parameter other				Cell numbers per litre			Not specified
Threshold value upper	7.1	0.59	1.31	1000000.0	10.6	6.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	Other (specify)	OSPAR Convention
Threshold value source other					National
Value achieved upper	5.79	0.46	0.62	28503.0	13.5	7.76
Value achieved lower	1.7	0.23	0.24		9.6	5.76
Value unit				Other
Value unit other				Cell numbers per litre
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Not assessed
Description parameter	In the third application of OSPAR Common Procedure, total nitrogen concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.	In the third application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, total phosphorus concentrations and the DIN to DIP ratio were also assessed.		Due to insufficient data, an assessment of criterion D5C3 was not possible.		Only the minima are reported for oxygen. During the 3rd application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the mean values of oxygen concentrations were also assessed.
Related indicator	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Winter Nutrient Concentrations in the Greater North Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak Nährstoffkonzentrationen (DIN, DIP, TN, TP)	Concentrations of Chlorophyll-a in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas Chlorophyllkonzentrationen	Trends in Blooms of the Nuisance Phytoplankton Species Phaeocystis in Belgian, Dutch and German Waters Artenverschiebung in der Florazusammensetzung	Sichttiefe	Concentrations of Dissolved Oxygen Near the Seafloor Sauerstoffkonzentration
Criteria status	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Good	Good	Not assessed
Description criteria				For criterion D5C3, only Phaeocystis may be reported here. During the 3rd application of the OSPAR Common Procedure, the indicator species Dinophysis, Prorocentrum and Pseudo-nitzschia were assessed in addition. Due to insufficient data, an assessment of criterion D5C3 was not possible.			One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Element status	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Good	Good	Not assessed
Description element				Due to insufficient data, an assessment of criterion D5C3 was not possible.			One indicator of the assessment of criterion D5C8 is in development.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the first step is to evaluate the annual mean of each parameter against the area-specific threshold. In a second step, the evaluation results are evaluated over the entire evaluation period. The final result depends on which evaluation result outweighs the single years. If e.g. the DIN concentrations were rated five times as good and four times as bad over an evaluation period of 9 years, the overall evaluation result is good.
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.	According to the OSPAR Common Procedure, the one-out principle is applied between D5C1, D5C2, D5C3, D5C4, D5C5.
GES extent threshold	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
GES extent achieved	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	GES achieved	GES achieved	GES achieved	GES achieved	GES achieved	GES achieved	GES achieved
Description overall status
Assessments period	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014	2006-2014
Related pressures	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources	Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
Related targets	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3	UZN1 UZN1.1 UZN1.2 UZN1.3