Member State report / Art9 / 2018 / D2 / Germany / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D2 Non-indigenous species
Member State Germany
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Reported by Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit
Report date 2020-02-17
Report access DE_ART9_GES.xml

GES component
D2
D2C1
D2C2
D2C3
Marine reporting units
  • BALDE_MS
Features
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
GES description
Good environmental status for the descriptor "non-indigenous species" is achieved "when the introduction and transfer of new species approaches zero, and if non-indigenous species do not have a negative impact on populations of native species and habitats. As with the WFD, non-indigenous species should not be an exclusion criterion for achieving the good status (GES) as a whole. Currently, only criterion D2C2, as set out in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848, is used to determine GES for D1. Future use of criteria D2C2 and D2C3 is dependent on scientific progress. For a MSFD specific assessment of the specific effects on populations of native species (secondary criterion D2C2) and natural habitats (secondary criterion D2C3), existing assessment methods are insufficient. There is a need for research. Explanation: Germany does not update the general description of good environmental status (GES) from 2012 at descriptor level in this reporting exercise. During the reporting period, Germany has worked with the countries bordering the Baltic Sea in the framework of the EU's MSFD CIS process and with HELCOM to develop methodological standards (indicators, evaluation procedures). Specific aspects of criteria and indicators that contribute to a quantitative assessment of good environmental status are reported in the reporting scheme Art. 8_GES. For the assessment of the criteria set out in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848, the relevant assessments under other EU directives shall be taken into account under Article 8_GES, taking into account, as far as possible, the regional assessments that have been coordinated so far and, on a case-by-case basis, supplemented by national assessments.
Determination date
201810
Update type
Same as last reported determination
Justification for non-use of criterion
For D2C1, a threshold value of max. 1, which differs from HELCOM, was defined because, in line with the North Sea, a pragmatic threshold has been set at less than 25 % of the entry rate determined through constant monitoring. However, the environmental objective (Article 10 of the MSFD) aims to completely prevent new introduction.
Justification for delay in setting EU/regional requirements
During the reporting period, regional cooperation focused on the development of methodological standards to assess the various aspects of stress and resilience on the basis of Commission Decision 2010/477/EU. The indicators vary in their level of maturity and require further development or testing. Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 gives, for the first time, an explicit obligation on the part of the EU Member States to agree on evaluation elements, thresholds and integration rules in the framework of the EU MSFD CIS process and through regional or subregional cooperation. Germany is actively working with the countries bordering the Baltic Sea in the framework of the ongoing work programmes of the EU MSFD and the HELCOM bodies to establish where a coordinated definition is still missing.