Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Denmark / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D3 Commercial fish and shellfish
Member State Denmark
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Reported by Danish Environmental Protection Agency
Report date 2019-08-30
Report access DK_ART8_GES_Merge_20190829.xml

Danish part of Atlantic North Sea from coastline to EEZ (ANS-DK-TOTAL)

GES component
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
Feature
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element
Ammodytes spp
Ammodytes spp
Anguilla anguilla
Anguilla anguilla
Clupea harengus
Clupea harengus
Crangon crangon
Crangon crangon
Gadus morhua
Gadus morhua
Gadus morhua
Gadus morhua
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
Merluccius merluccius
Merluccius merluccius
Mytilus edulis
Mytilus edulis
Nephrops norvegicus
Nephrops norvegicus
Pandalus borealis
Pandalus borealis
Pleuronectes platessa
Pleuronectes platessa
Pollachius virens
Pollachius virens
Scomber scombrus
Scomber scombrus
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima]
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima]
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima]
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima]
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris)
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris)
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris)
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris)
Sprattus sprattus
Sprattus sprattus
Sprattus sprattus
Sprattus sprattus
Trisopterus esmarkii
Trisopterus esmarkii
Element code
125909
125909
126281
126281
126417
126417
107552
107552
126436
126436
126436
126436
126437
126437
126484
126484
140480
140480
107254
107254
107649
107649
127143
127143
126441
126441
127023
127023
127149
127149
127149
127149
127160
127160
127160
127160
126425
126425
126425
126425
126444
126444
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in Divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea)
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in Divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea)
European eel in the Northeast Atlantic
European eel in the Northeast Atlantic
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel)
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel)
No information
No information
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak)
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak)
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivision 21 (Kattegat)
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivision 21 (Kattegat)
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4, Division 6.a and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, West of Scotland, Skagerrak)
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4, Division 6.a and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, West of Scotland, Skagerrak)
Hake in Division IIIa, Subareas IV, VI and VII and Divisions VIIIa,b,d (Northern stock)
Hake in Division IIIa, Subareas IV, VI and VII and Divisions VIIIa,b,d (Northern stock)
No information
No information
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 3.a, Functional units 3 and 4 (Skagerrak and Kattegat)
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 3.a, Functional units 3 and 4 (Skagerrak and Kattegat)
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in Divisions IIIa West and IVa East (Skagerrak and Norwegian Deeps)
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in Divisions IIIa West and IVa East (Skagerrak and Norwegian Deeps)
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 21–23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound)
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 21–23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound)
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in Subareas 4, 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat)
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in Subareas 4, 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat)
Mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic (combined Southern, Western and North Sea spawning components)
Mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic (combined Southern, Western and North Sea spawning components)
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat)
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat)
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in subdivisions 22–32 (Baltic Sea)
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in subdivisions 22–32 (Baltic Sea)
Sole (Solea solea) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)
Sole (Solea solea) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)
Sole (Solea solea) in subdivisions 20–24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea)
Sole (Solea solea) in subdivisions 20–24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea)
S. sprattus in subarea 4 (North Sea)
S. sprattus in subarea 4 (North Sea)
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat)
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat)
Norway Pout in Subarea IV (North Sea) and IIIa (Skagerrak - Kattegat) - Autumn assessment
Norway Pout in Subarea IV (North Sea) and IIIa (Skagerrak - Kattegat) - Autumn assessment
Element 2 code
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
FishCommercial
Element 2 code source
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Element source
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
Criterion
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
No
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Unknown
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Unknown
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Good
Not good
Good
Good
Not good
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Description criteria
Element status
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Good
Description element
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
Den samlede tilstand er vurderet som god. Tilstanden, vurderet ud fra dødeligheden som følge af fiskeri, er god, mens tilstanden, vurderet ud fra gydebiomassen, er udefineret.
Den samlede tilstand er vurderet som god. Tilstanden, vurderet ud fra dødeligheden som følge af fiskeri, er god, mens tilstanden, vurderet ud fra gydebiomassen, er udefineret.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, and the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is not good.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, and the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is not good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
Den samlede tilstand er vurderet som ikke god. Tilstanden, vurderet ud fra dødeligheden som følge af fiskeri, er god, mens tilstanden, vurderet ud fra gydebiomassen, ikke er god.
Den samlede tilstand er vurderet som ikke god. Tilstanden, vurderet ud fra dødeligheden som følge af fiskeri, er god, mens tilstanden, vurderet ud fra gydebiomassen, ikke er god.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
No integration rule has been applied.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
Assessments period
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
2018-2024
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3
  • DK-T3.1
  • DK-T3.2
  • DK-T3.3