Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Denmark / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
Member State | Denmark |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Danish Environmental Protection Agency |
Report date | 2019-08-30 |
Report access | DK_ART8_GES_Merge_20190829.xml |
Danish part of Atlantic North Sea from coastline to EEZ (ANS-DK-TOTAL)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Ammodytes spp |
Ammodytes spp |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Crangon crangon |
Crangon crangon |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Mytilus edulis |
Mytilus edulis |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Pandalus borealis |
Pandalus borealis |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pollachius virens |
Pollachius virens |
Scomber scombrus |
Scomber scombrus |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Trisopterus esmarkii |
Trisopterus esmarkii |
Element code |
125909 |
125909 |
126281 |
126281 |
126417 |
126417 |
107552 |
107552 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126437 |
126437 |
126484 |
126484 |
140480 |
140480 |
107254 |
107254 |
107649 |
107649 |
127143 |
127143 |
126441 |
126441 |
127023 |
127023 |
127149 |
127149 |
127149 |
127149 |
127160 |
127160 |
127160 |
127160 |
126425 |
126425 |
126425 |
126425 |
126444 |
126444 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in Divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in Divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea) |
European eel in the Northeast Atlantic
|
European eel in the Northeast Atlantic
|
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel) |
No information
|
No information
|
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivision 21 (Kattegat)
|
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivision 21 (Kattegat)
|
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4, Division 6.a and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, West of Scotland, Skagerrak) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4, Division 6.a and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, West of Scotland, Skagerrak) |
Hake in Division IIIa, Subareas IV, VI and VII and Divisions VIIIa,b,d (Northern stock) |
Hake in Division IIIa, Subareas IV, VI and VII and Divisions VIIIa,b,d (Northern stock) |
No information
|
No information
|
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 3.a, Functional units 3 and 4 (Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 3.a, Functional units 3 and 4 (Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in Divisions IIIa West and IVa East (Skagerrak and Norwegian Deeps) |
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in Divisions IIIa West and IVa East (Skagerrak and Norwegian Deeps) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 21–23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 21–23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in Subareas 4, 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in Subareas 4, 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic (combined Southern, Western and North Sea spawning components) |
Mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic (combined Southern, Western and North Sea spawning components) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in subdivisions 22–32 (Baltic Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in subdivisions 22–32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)
|
Sole (Solea solea) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)
|
Sole (Solea solea) in subdivisions 20–24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in subdivisions 20–24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
S. sprattus in subarea 4 (North Sea)
|
S. sprattus in subarea 4 (North Sea)
|
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat)
|
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat)
|
Norway Pout in Subarea IV (North Sea) and IIIa (Skagerrak - Kattegat) - Autumn assessment |
Norway Pout in Subarea IV (North Sea) and IIIa (Skagerrak - Kattegat) - Autumn assessment |
Element 2 code |
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Parameter other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
|
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
Den samlede tilstand er vurderet som god. Tilstanden, vurderet ud fra dødeligheden som følge af fiskeri, er god, mens tilstanden, vurderet ud fra gydebiomassen, er udefineret.
|
Den samlede tilstand er vurderet som god. Tilstanden, vurderet ud fra dødeligheden som følge af fiskeri, er god, mens tilstanden, vurderet ud fra gydebiomassen, er udefineret.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, and the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is not good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, and the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is not good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
|
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
Den samlede tilstand er vurderet som ikke god. Tilstanden, vurderet ud fra dødeligheden som følge af fiskeri, er god, mens tilstanden, vurderet ud fra gydebiomassen, ikke er god.
|
Den samlede tilstand er vurderet som ikke god. Tilstanden, vurderet ud fra dødeligheden som følge af fiskeri, er god, mens tilstanden, vurderet ud fra gydebiomassen, ikke er god.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
|
The overall state is undefined. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed on the basis of spawning biomass, is undefined.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed on the basis of fishing mortality, is undefined, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of 22 selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the North Sea shows good environmental status for 10 stocks, not good for eight stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for four stocks. Fishing mortality is estimated to be too high in five of the 22 stocks and is undefined in nine of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the 22 stocks and undefined in seven stocks. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
Assessments period |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|