Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D4 / Denmark / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems |
Member State | Denmark |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Danish Environmental Protection Agency |
Report date | 2019-08-30 |
Report access | DK_ART8_GES_Merge_20190829.xml |
Danish part of Atlantic North Sea from coastline to EEZ (ANS-DK-TOTAL)
GES component |
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Element |
Primary producers |
Apex predators |
Planktivores |
Primary producers |
Secondary producers |
Sub-apex demersal predators |
Element code |
TrophicGuildsPrimProd |
TrophicGuildsPredApex |
TrophicGuildsPlankt |
TrophicGuildsPrimProd |
TrophicGuildsSecProd |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem |
Element code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element 2 |
||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D4C1
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Parameter other |
Diversity of primary producers see report in D1 pelagic habitats |
Biomass as reported under D1 pelagic habitats
|
Biomass of zooplankton see report under D1 pelagic habitats. |
|||
Threshold value upper |
||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
The diversity (species composition and their relative density) of the individual trophic levels is not negatively affected by man-made pressures.
|
The balance between the trophic levels (biomass or number of individuals).
|
The balance between the trophic levels (biomass or number of individuals).
|
The balance between the trophic levels (biomass or number of individuals).
|
||
Threshold value source |
||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
2000.0 |
60.0 |
||||
Value achieved lower |
30.0 |
|||||
Value unit |
tonne
|
Other
|
||||
Value unit other |
mg C pr cubic meter
|
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
The distribution of phytoplankton shows large year-to-date fluctuations (see D1C6) but no trend over time. However, the number of species varies relatively little when calculated on the North Sea scale. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
|
The above assessment covers the total biomass for the three species (gray seal, spotted seal and porpoise) from 2016. Of this, the biomass of guinea pigs is between 82-89%. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
|
For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
|
Upper and lower values show the higher and lower annual mean values observed during the assessment period. Overall biomass of primary producers have been decreasing in the North Sea and Kattegat for the period 1978-2016, a slight increase has been observed since 2012. |
There is no recognizable trend in the evolution of the zooplankton biomass since 2010 on the basis of a limited data base.
|
The biomass of large fish-eating fish (piscivore) around Denmark increased slightly in the period from 2010 to 2016 in the North Sea. The biomass of medium-sized pelagic fish around Denmark was at a high level in the period from 2010 to 2016, as the mackerel population has again increased after a period of low biomasses. This probably involves increased food competition with other planktivorous fish and increased mortality of herring, sand eel, sprat and cod. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
|
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
The species diversity of phytoplankton exhibits large year-on-year fluctuations, but no trend over time. However, the number of species varies relatively little when calculated on the North Sea scale, and no temporal trends are still seen here. Overall, the species diversity of phytoplankton cannot be stated as being in good environmental condition, as the data base is currently too flimsy to be able to assess this.
|
The total marine mammal biomass is stable or increased from 1994 to 2016. The biomass in 2005 was lower than in 1994 (Figure 23.6). Porpoises make up 82-89% of the biomass all year, and the total figures for marine mammals are therefore mainly controlled by the biomass of harbour porpoises. The spotted seal has increased in number from 1994 to 2005 and from 2005 to 2016 in both areas. Gray seal was virtually absent in 1994 and 2005, but in 2016 the number has increased significantly in the MRU. Furthermore, according to the GES decision, good environmental status for seals and porpoises is considered to correspond to favorable conservation status under the Habitats Directive. Here, the condition of marine mammals in the Danish marine areas was assessed in 2013 under Article 17. It was considered that the condition of the spotted seal and porpoises in the North Sea and the Kattegat was favorable, while the condition of gray seal was unfavorable. On this basis, it is not possible to make an overall assessment of the state of the trophic level.
|
The biomass of small pelagic fish around Denmark has increased slightly in the period from 2010 to 2016, as both North Sea herring and North Sea sprat have increased. The food supply for predators on these species has thus been the site in recent years. Especially sprat is eaten by many birds and fish species.
|
The overall plankton biomass has been steadily declining in the North Sea and the Kattegat from 1978 to 2016. A slight increase is seen after 2012.
|
Data from the North Sea show that the proportion of zooplankton biomass exceeding 2000 μm in 2017 was below average for 2012-2015 and significantly below the highest value from 2014. Thus, the feeding conditions for both filtering (eg. herring) and particulate (e.g. sand eel) eating fish somewhat below average during the summer period in 2017. The time series is too short for trends to be described for longer periods.
|
The biomass of large fish-eating fish (piscivore) around Denmark increased slightly in the period from 2010 to 2016 in the North Sea. The biomass of medium-sized pelagic fish around Denmark was at a high level in the period from 2010 to 2016, as the mackerel population has again increased after a period of low biomasses. This probably involves increased food competition with other planktivorous fish and increased mortality of herring, sand eel, sprat and cod.
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
In a national inventory of marine mammals, three species are evaluated - harbour porpoise, spotted seal and gray seal. The condition of the marine mammals can often be seen as a good indicator of the overall state of the food chain, as the condition of this group of species is dependent on the condition of the underlying trophic levels.
|
This evaluation covers fish. Specifically the larger fisheating fish - in this evaluation populations of North Sea cod and North Sea saithe. Additionally medium fisheating fish which covers makrel in thei evaluation. |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
Integration has not been applied within trophic levels |
Integration has not been applied within trophic levels |
Integration has not been applied within trophic levels |
Integration has not been applied within trophic levels |
Integration has not been applied within trophic levels |
Integration has not been applied within trophic levels |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration has not been applied
|
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danish part of Atlantic North Sea from coastline to EEZ. Data covers DK-TOTAL. (DK-TOTAL-part-ANS)
GES component |
D4
|
---|---|
Feature |
Shelf ecosystem
|
Element |
Sub-apex pelagic predators |
Element code |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexPel |
Element code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element 2 |
|
Element 2 code |
|
Element 2 code source |
|
Element source |
EU |
Criterion |
D4C2
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Parameter other |
As reported under D1C2 for birds
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Threshold value source other |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Value unit other |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
For birds, good environmental status corresponds to the assessment under Article 12 of the Birds Protection Directive. Data from the recent report (2013) of breeding birds shows that, in general, certain species groups are stable or progressive, such as herbivores and birds foraging in the water column. For groups such as waders and birds foraging in the surface, less than 75% of the species are stable or in progress. For wintering birds, most of the species groups are stable, progressive or fluctuating, but not birds that seek food on the seabed.
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
This description deals with birds that also cross other trophic levels. In 2013, Denmark reported development trends for a number of Danish birds to the EU under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive. The assessment covered the entire Danish marine area. Inventory development varies between species. The number of gulls and alfalfa is, for example. overall, with the exception of the splits, the terns are in decline. For wintering birds, it is difficult to describe a uniform trend.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Integration has not been applied
|
GES extent threshold |
|
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
|
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|