Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Denmark / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
Member State | Denmark |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Danish Environmental Protection Agency |
Report date | 2019-08-30 |
Report access | DK_ART8_GES_Merge_20190829.xml |
Danish part of Baltic Sea from coastline to EEZ (BAL-DK-TOTAL)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Ammodytes spp |
Ammodytes spp |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Element code |
125909 |
125909 |
126417 |
126417 |
126417 |
126417 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126425 |
126425 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
Mest Østersølandinger
|
Mest Østersølandinger
|
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 20–24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 20–24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring in Subareas I, II, V and Divisions IVa and XIVa (Norwegian spring-spawning herring) |
Herring in Subareas I, II, V and Divisions IVa and XIVa (Norwegian spring-spawning herring) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 22–24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 22–24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 25–32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 25–32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions 22–32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions 22–32 (Baltic Sea)
|
Element 2 code |
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
FishCommercial
|
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Parameter other |
||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||
Value unit |
||||||||||||
Value unit other |
||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
||||||||||||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Den samlede tilstand er vurderet som udefineret. Tilstanden, vurderet ud fra dødeligheden som følge af fiskeri, er udefineret, mens tilstanden, vurderet ud fra gydebiomassen, er udefineret.
|
Den samlede tilstand er vurderet som udefineret. Tilstanden, vurderet ud fra dødeligheden som følge af fiskeri, er udefineret, mens tilstanden, vurderet ud fra gydebiomassen, er udefineret.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, and the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is not good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, and the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is not good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, and the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is not good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, and the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is not good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as not good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is not good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
The overall condition is rated as good. The condition, assessed from mortality due to fishing, is good, while the condition, assessed from the spawning biomass, is good.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
No integration rule has been applied.
|
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
The environmental status of six selected fish, crustacean and shellfish stocks in the Baltic Sea shows good environmental status for two stocks, not good for three stocks, while the condition cannot be determined for one stock. The fishing mortality rate is estimated to be too high in three of the six stocks and is undefined in one of the stocks. The spawning biomass is too low in two of the six stocks and undefined in one stock. Overall, therefore, the environmental condition of D3 is not considered good. The CFP means that most commercially exploited species must be managed according to MSY principles by 2020. However, there may be some stocks where special conditions mean that the stock will take longer to reach the MSY level. This may be the case for collapsed stocks or stocks with slow reproductive species such as cod in the Kattegat. Therefore, it is expected that good environmental status will be partially achieved by 2020 for fish mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). In order for a fish stock to be in good condition, all criteria must in principle be met. At present, however, only D3C1 and D3C2 are used in the assessment, as the methods for estimating the size and length of large fish for D3C3 have not yet been validated. ICES, on the other hand, recommends that D3C3 be used as a monitoring indicator in relation to the age and size distribution in fish stocks.
|
Assessments period |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
2018-2024 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|