For circalittoral coarse sediment, 42 km2 is estimated to be disturbed out of a total area of the 58 km2 habitat, which corresponds to 72% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU.

For circalittorally coarse sediment, 4.4 km2 was estimated to be lost out of a total area of the 58 km2 habitat, which is equivalent to 8% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

For circalittorally mixed sediment, 1669 km2 is estimated to be disturbed by a total area of 2076 km2 of habitat, which corresponds to 80% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU.

For circalittorally mixed sediment, 4.9 km2 was estimated to be lost from a total area of the 2076 km2 habitat, which is equivalent to 0.2% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

For circalittoral mud, 2398 km2 is estimated to be disturbed out of a total area of 3029 km2, which corresponds to 79% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU.

For circalittoral mud, 7.3 km2 has been estimated to be lost out of a total area of 3029 km2, which corresponds to 0.2% of the overall habitat type lost in the MRU.

For circalittoral rock, rock and biogenic reef, 70 km2 is estimated to be disturbed by a total area of 87 km2 of habitat, which is equivalent to 81% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU. Stone reefs are in the inventory calculated under mixed sediment.

For circalittoral rock, rock and biogenic reef, 1.6 km2 has been estimated to be lost from a total area of the 87 km2 habitat, which is equivalent to 2% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

For circalittoral sand, 2043 km2 is estimated to be disturbed out of a total area of 2522 km2, which corresponds to 81% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU.

For circalittoral sand, 12.9 km2 is estimated to be lost out of a total area of the habitat type of 2522 km2, which is equivalent to 0.5% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

For infralittoral coarse sediment, 67 km2 is estimated to be disturbed out of a total area of the 96 km2 habitat, which corresponds to 70% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU.

For infralittorally coarse sediment, 50.3 km2 has been estimated to be lost out of a total area of the 96 km2 habitat, which corresponds to 52% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

For infralittorally mixed sediment, 1569 km2 is estimated to be disturbed out of a total area of the habitat type of 4021 km2, which is equivalent to 39% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU.

For infralittorally mixed sediment, 49.6 km2 has been estimated to be lost from a total area of the habitat type of 4021 km2, which is equivalent to 1% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

For infralittoral mud, 1069 km2 is estimated to be disturbed out of a total area of 2855 km2 of habitat, which is equivalent to 37% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU.

For infralittoral mud, 28 km2 is estimated to be lost from a total area of 2855 km2 of habitat, which is equivalent to 1% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

For infralittoral rock, rocks and biogenic reefs, 139 km2 is estimated to be disturbed by a total area of the habitat type of 172 km2, which corresponds to 81% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU. Stone reefs are in the inventory calculated under mixed sediment.

For infralittoral rock, rock and biogenic reef, 5.7 km2 was estimated to be lost from a total area of the habitat type of 172 km2, which is equivalent to 3% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

For infralittoral sand, 1513 km2 is estimated to be disturbed out of a total area of 4899 km2 of habitat, which corresponds to 31% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU.

For infralittoral sand, 152.3 km2 is estimated to be lost out of a total area of the habitat type of 4899 km2, which corresponds to 3% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

For infralittoral sand, 1513 km2 is estimated to be disturbed out of a total area of 4899 km2 of habitat, which corresponds to 31% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU.

For offshore circalittorally coarse sediment, 0 km2 is estimated to be lost from a total area of the habitat type of 4 km2, which is equivalent to 0% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

For offshore circalittorally mixed sediment, 1182 km2 is estimated to be disturbed by a total area of habitat type of 1282 km2, which corresponds to approx. 92% of the overall habitat type is disturbed in the MRU.

For offshore circalittorally mixed sediment, 0.005 km2 is estimated to be lost from a total area of the 1282 km2 habitat, which is equivalent to less than 0.1% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

For offshore circalittoral mud, 7022 km2 is estimated to be disturbed by a total area of 7167 km2 of habitat, which corresponds to 98% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU.

For offshore circalittoral mud, 0.1 km2 is estimated to be lost from a total area of the 7167 km2 habitat, which means that less than 0.1% of the overall habitat type is lost in the MRU.

For offshore circalittoral sand, 252 km2 is estimated to be disturbed out of a total area of the habitat type of 292 km2, which corresponds to 86% of the overall habitat type being disturbed in the MRU.

For offshore circalittoral sand, 0.1 km2 is estimated to be lost out of a total area of 292 km2 of habitat, which is equivalent to less than 0.1% of the overall habitat type being lost in the MRU.

Eelgrass has its predominantly main distribution coastal within 1 nautical mile of the coast, and the characterization and protection of eelgrass is therefore primarily related to the watercourse plans. For the MRU, the condition of eelgrass is considered to be from poor to good. The condition in relation to soft-bottom fauna is mainly between poor to good. However, some small demarcated areas are rated poor and high respectively. For both factors, the condition in some areas is assessed unknown.

For the estuary habitat (1130), there is only one in the region, and its structure and function status was assessed as unknown, resulting in an overall assessment of the habitat as being in favorable status. Trend for the condition is unknown for estuary.

For shallow bay and cove (1160), unfavorable conservation status, including unfavorable status in relation to structure and function as well as future prospects, has been assessed. Trend for the condition is considered stable for shallow bay and cove.

For wading surface (1140), unfavorable conservation status has been assessed, including unfavorable status in relation to structure and function as well as future prospects. Trend for condition is unknown for wading surface.

For reefs (1170), unfavorable conservation status has been assessed, including unfavorable status in relation to structure and function as well as future prospects. Trend for the condition is considered stable for reef.

For sand banks (1110), unfavorable conservation status has been assessed, including unfavorable status in relation to structure and function, as well as future prospects. Trend for the condition is assessed in progress for bubble reefs.

For the sea cave (8330), unfavorable conservation status has been assessed, including unfavorable status in relation to structure and function, as well as future prospects. Trend for the condition is unknown for sea cave.

Pressure factors that cause disturbance in this analysis include: Fishing with bottom trawls, mussel dredging, dumping of material from dredging and similar, submarine communication cables, undersea tunnels, aquaculture. The total disturbance makes up 67% (66.7%) of the MRU. Fishing with bottom-trapping gear constitutes the most significant disturbance (19019 km2). Next comes dumping (18 km2). There is thus a great deal of disturbance, but the intensity (fishing pressure) is very varied. That is, in some areas there is a high fishing pressure, while in many areas there is a relatively low fishing pressure. In Denmark, fishing is carried out with bottom-trapping gear, especially for fish, scampi and mussels. The calculation of the impact of the fishery includes both Danish and foreign fishing boats over 12 meters and certain smaller boats and was made for the year 2013. Fishing for fish and scampi is often carried out at the same sites year after year. Therefore, a single year's data will in general be an acceptable reflection of the distribution of fisheries. However, it is important to realize that there may be differences in the distribution of fisheries locally from year to year. Changes in fish stocks and target species over time can also have a major impact on the distribution of fisheries in some marine areas. This has been the case, for example, in the Kattegat, where there has been no targeted cod fishing in recent years. The sites for clam fishing, on the other hand, can change from year to year. The physical disturbance of the seabed from mussel dredging in recent years can thus be underestimated in the calculation. There are uncertainties in the estimation of disturbance from fisheries. This is partly because the majority of boats below 12 m are not included. They can fish in the same areas as the other boats (and thus do not affect the inventory), but they can also fish elsewhere, which will result in an underestimate. At the same time, the fish disturbance is calculated based on presence in a quadrant of 4x4 km. The whole quadrant is thus calculated as disturbed. It is not possible with this method to estimate how much of the quadrant is actually fished (see also section 13.4).

Pressure factors that cause losses include in this analysis: Bridges (incl. Land reclamation), Ports / facilities (incl. Land reclamation), Oil / gas installations (platforms and pipelines), Raw material areas, Deepening of canals. The total loss represents 1.1% of the MRU Raw material extraction results in the largest loss share (302 km2), however, it is estimated that the estimate of losses caused by raw material extraction is larger than the actual area, since the entire recovery area is included despite the fact that extraction only is made in parts of the area, and despite the fact that the resident must leave a layer of the original substrate in the area. The next biggest cause of loss is gullies (11.3 km2)