Member State report / Art9 / 2018 / D1-M / Estonia / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Mammals |
Member State | Estonia |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Estonian Environment Agency |
Report date | 2020-04-06 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART9_GES_FINAL2019_.xml |
GES component |
D1
|
D1-M
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|||||
Features |
|
|
|||||
GES description |
GES is achieved for abundance of seals (grey and ringed seals) in Baltic Sea if the population is above 10,000 individuals and the population is showing at least 7% increase in annual abundance rate.
Grey seals: no separate GES definition for Estonian marine units.
Ringed seals: no separate GES definition for Estonian marine units. |
Grey seals: GES is achieved if the distributional range is covering whole Estonian marine area which is 36260 km2.
Ringed seals: GES is achieved if the distributional range is at least 12050 km2.
GES is achieved if the distribution pattern of seals (grey and ringed seals) are not fragmented in their distributional area. |
|||||
Determination date |
201807 |
201807 |
|||||
Update type |
New determination |
New determination |
|||||
Justification for non-use of criterion |
Criteria D1C1 is not used for determining GES because there is not enough reliable data about mortality rate per bird, seal and fish species from incidental by-catch. Criteria not applicable for pelagic habitats. |
Not mandatory for fish and not applicable for pelagic habitats. |
Not mandatory for birds and not applicable for pelagic habitats.
Four fish species covered by Annexes II (Cobitis taenia; Cottus gobio; Lampetra fluviatilis) and V (Coregonus lavaretus) of Directive 92/43/EEC are permanently inhabiting Estonian marine waters.
For Cobitis taenia and Cottus gobio the data is fragmented mainly due to lack of monitoring of these species, therefore developing threshold values and assessing GES was not possible.
Lampetra fluviatilis and Coregonus lavaretus are very mobile species, the distributional range is not related to any specific habitat type and there is no data which would enable to assume that the distribution range would be obstructed, therefore assessing distributional range is not applicable for Lampetra fluviatilis and Coregonus lavaretus. |
||||
Justification for delay in setting EU/regional requirements |