Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D1-P / Estonia / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Pelagic habitats |
Member State | Estonia |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Estonian Environment Agency |
Report date | 2014-09-25; 2020-11-11 |
Report access |
2014 data
2020 data
Monitoring programme | Monitoring programme name | MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring programme | Reference existing programme | |||
Monitoring programme | Marine Unit ID | |||
Q4e - Programme ID | BALLT-D01234-2 |
BALLT-D01234-2 |
BALLT-D012567-8 |
|
Q4f - Programme description |
Siekiama patikimai įvertinti Lietuvos priekrantės žuvų bendrijų būklę ir sudėtį, įvertinant bendrijų rūšinę įvairovę, pagrindinių žuvų rūšių amžinę struktūrą, gausumo ir biomasės populiacinius parametrus, įvertinti atsiradusius pokyčius populiacijose, bendrijose. Rodikliai, kurie skaičiuojami naudojant monitoringo duomenis, poveikiui pakankamai jautrūs, populiacijų būklės pokyčiai pastebimi kelių metų bėgyje. Rodiklio priklausomybė nuo komercinės žvejybos yra pakankamai įrodyta įvairiuose jūros regionuose ir gėluose vandenyse. Žvejybos, kaip vieno pagrindinių veiksnių, veikiančių priekrantės žuvų bendrijas, intensyvumas yra stebimas ir reguliuojamas teisės aktais. Žuvų bendrijų monitoringas atspindi šių žvejybos reguliavimo priemonių efektyvumą.
Siekiant patikimai įvertinti Lietuvos priekrantės žuvų bendrijų būklę ir sudėtį, stebėseną numatyta atlikti kasmet skirtingose akvatorijose Baltijos jūros priekrantėje.
|
Siekiama patikimai įvertinti Lietuvos priekrantės žuvų bendrijų būklę ir sudėtį, įvertinant bendrijų rūšinę įvairovę, pagrindinių žuvų rūšių amžinę struktūrą, gausumo ir biomasės populiacinius parametrus, įvertinti atsiradusius pokyčius populiacijose, bendrijose. Rodikliai, kurie skaičiuojami naudojant monitoringo duomenis, poveikiui pakankamai jautrūs, populiacijų būklės pokyčiai pastebimi kelių metų bėgyje. Rodiklio priklausomybė nuo komercinės žvejybos yra pakankamai įrodyta įvairiuose jūros regionuose ir gėluose vandenyse. Žvejybos, kaip vieno pagrindinių veiksnių, veikiančių priekrantės žuvų bendrijas, intensyvumas yra stebimas ir reguliuojamas teisės aktais. Žuvų bendrijų monitoringas atspindi šių žvejybos reguliavimo priemonių efektyvumą.
Siekiant patikimai įvertinti Lietuvos priekrantės žuvų bendrijų būklę ir sudėtį, stebėseną numatyta atlikti kasmet skirtingose akvatorijose Baltijos jūros priekrantėje.
|
Dugno buveinių monitoringas skirtas vertinti svarbių jūros buveinių būklę ir jos pokyčius pagal Buveinių direktyvą, BVPD ir Jūrų strategijos pagrindų direktyvą. Lietuvos priekrantėje yra išskirtos vertingos kieto ir minkšto dugno buveinės, kurios funkcionuoja kaip nerštavietės, atsiganymo vietos žuvims ir paukščiams, žuvų jauniklių slėptuvės, ar palaiko aukštą rūšinę įvairovę. Buveinių monitoringą sudaro buveinių, tipinių rūšių kokybinio ir kiekybinio vertinimo dalys. Šiuo metu vykdomas minkšto grunto monitoringas, paremtas taškiniais tyrimais (kokybinis vertinimas). Monitoringo rezultatai panaudojami jūros būklei vertinti pagal BQI indeksą (BQI index). Pagal šį indeksą vertinama bentoso kokybė pagal bestuburės dugno faunos gausumą, rūšių skaičių ir taksonominių grupių jautrumą. Taip pat vykdomas makrofitobentoso monitoringas priekrantėje saugomų teritorijų (rifų) ribose siekiant vertinti makrofitų bendrijų rūšinę sudėtį, gausumą/padengimą, biomasę, augimo gylius.
Monitoringo rezultatai panaudojami poveikiams (pvz., uoste kasamo grunto gramzdinimas, paplūdimių maitinimas smėliu, dugno tralavimas) vertinti ar eutrofikacijos pasekmėms stebėti.
|
|
Q5e - Natural variability |
|
|
|
|
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate data | Y |
Y |
N |
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Established methods | Y |
Y |
N |
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES | Y |
Y |
N |
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate capacity | Y |
Y |
Y |
Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment |
Baltijos jūros priekrantės žuvų bendrijos būklė vertinama remiantis HELCOM rekomendacijomis, naudojant 4 pagrindinius žuvų bendrijų būklę atspindinčius rodiklius –bendrijos įvairovės indeksą (Shannon indeksas) (1.6.1. rodiklis), bendrijos dydžio indeksą (didelių žuvų gausumas) (1.7.1. rodiklis), bendrijos gausumo indeksą (plėšrių žuvų gausumas) ir bendrijos trofinį indeksą (4.2.1. rodikliai). Šių rodiklių skaičiavimo ir duomenų rinkimo metodinės rekomendacijos yra parengtos HELCOM ekspertų. Skaičiavimui duomenys yra surenkami vykdant monitoringo programą.
Eilę metų vykdomi standartizuoti tyrimai leidžia įvertinti natūralią kaitą ir nustatyti (ekspertiškai) antropogenionio poveikio mastą (rodiklių bei būklės kaita priklausomai nuo žinomų veiksnių intensyvumo).
|
Baltijos jūros priekrantės žuvų bendrijos būklė vertinama remiantis HELCOM rekomendacijomis, naudojant 4 pagrindinius žuvų bendrijų būklę atspindinčius rodiklius –bendrijos įvairovės indeksą (Shannon indeksas) (1.6.1. rodiklis), bendrijos dydžio indeksą (didelių žuvų gausumas) (1.7.1. rodiklis), bendrijos gausumo indeksą (plėšrių žuvų gausumas) ir bendrijos trofinį indeksą (4.2.1. rodikliai). Šių rodiklių skaičiavimo ir duomenų rinkimo metodinės rekomendacijos yra parengtos HELCOM ekspertų. Skaičiavimui duomenys yra surenkami vykdant monitoringo programą.
Eilę metų vykdomi standartizuoti tyrimai leidžia įvertinti natūralią kaitą ir nustatyti (ekspertiškai) antropogenionio poveikio mastą (rodiklių bei būklės kaita priklausomai nuo žinomų veiksnių intensyvumo).
|
Monitoringo (apimančio makrozoobentoso rūšinės sudėties, gausumo ir biomasės stebėseną, taškiniai tyrimai) rezultatai bus pakankami jų panaudojimui jūros aplinkos būklei vertinti pagal BKI (bentoso kokybės indeksas) indeksą. Indeksas tinkamas minkšto grunto buveinėms. Sukaupti ilgalaikiai zoobentoso duomenys leis stebėti ilgalaikius pokyčius ir pažangą siekiant GAB. Tai prisidės prie būklės vertinimo pagal deskriptorių D6. Tikslai ir susiję rodikliai pagal deskriptorius D1,4,6 bus peržiūrėti ir atnaujinti iki 2015 metų pabaigos, tuomet bus galima vertinti duomenų poreikį ir atitinkamai planuoti monitoringą. Seklių kieto grunto buveinių būklei vertinti kol kas bus galima panaudoti makrofitobentoso monitoringo rezultatus. Tačiau kol kas monitoringas teikia taškinio pobūdžio atskirų ekosistemos elementų būklės duomenis ir apie buveinių paplitimą, pasiskirstymo savybes ir pan. informacija nėra gaunama. Tačiau tam, kad vertinti būklę pagal D1, 4 būtina planuoti kieto grunto buveinių monitoringą.
Nepakanka duomenų siekiant įvertinti ar buveinių būklės pokyčiai dėl natūralių veiksnių ir klimato kaitos poveikio ar antropogeninių poveikių. Tam būtina atlikti išsamią esamų duomenų analizę siekiant įvertinti pokyčius ir jų prigimtį, kol kas įrodymų nėra.
Klimato kaitos baziniai rodikliai (temperatūros, druskingumas) yra stebimi, o jų vertinimas pagrįstas ilgalaikių duomenų analize. Standartinių metodų atskirti klimato poveikį nuo antropogeninio poveikio nėra, todėl dažniausiai pasikliaujama kiekvienam atvejui pritaikytu būklės vertinimu pagal konkretų rodiklį. Antropogeninės ir gamtinės kaitos beveik neįmanoma atskirti: pvz. marių ištekančių vandenų sklaidos zonoje, kur kartu veikia padidėjusių maistmedžiagių ir organinių medžiagų (antropogeniniai) bei druskingumo (klimatiniai) veiksnių poveikiai. Tokiais atvejais rodiklių jautrumas poveikiui tose zonose ribotas ir jų atsisakoma.
|
|
Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment | By2018 |
By2018 |
After2020 |
|
Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment |
Monitoringą numatoma vykdyti kasmet, vietoj 1 karto kas 3 metus. Suplanuotos tyrimo vietos pakankamai apims vertinamos akvatorijos gamtinių sąlygų įvairovę bei galimą žmogaus veiklos poveikį. Lietuvos ekspertai dalyvauja regioninėje (Baltijos) darbo grupėje (HELCOM FISH-PRO II), kurioje yra rengiami žuvų bendrijų būklės rodikliai, vykdoma duomenų analizė regiono mastu bei nustatomi trūkumai. Esant reikalui numatoma svarstyti trūkumus ir galimus sprendimo būdus.
Daugiau informacijos pdf ataskaitoje 16-20 psl.
|
Monitoringą numatoma vykdyti kasmet, vietoj 1 karto kas 3 metus. Suplanuotos tyrimo vietos pakankamai apims vertinamos akvatorijos gamtinių sąlygų įvairovę bei galimą žmogaus veiklos poveikį. Lietuvos ekspertai dalyvauja regioninėje (Baltijos) darbo grupėje (HELCOM FISH-PRO II), kurioje yra rengiami žuvų bendrijų būklės rodikliai, vykdoma duomenų analizė regiono mastu bei nustatomi trūkumai. Esant reikalui numatoma svarstyti trūkumus ir galimus sprendimo būdus.
Daugiau informacijos pdf ataskaitoje 16-20 psl.
|
Monitoringo programa kol kas nėra adekvati. Būtina planuoti kieto dugno buveinių monitoringą, apimantį buveinių pasiskirstymo, dydžio ir būklės vertinimą. Lietuvos ekspertai dalyvauja regioninėje darbo grupėje, rengiančioje rekomendacijas/metodikas buveinių monitoringui. Kol kas metodikos testuojamos mokslinių institucijų. Kai regiono mastu bus susitarta dėl metodikos planuojama ją įtraukti į nacionalinę monitoringo programą. Buveinių būklei vertinti metodika taip pat kol kas rengimo stadijoje. Lietuvos ekspertai dalyvauja regioninėje darbo grupėje (HELCOM CORESET II, HELCOM BALSAM ), kuri rengia vertinimo metodiką pagal rodiklį „Extent, pattern and distribution of benthic biotopes“ (1.4; 1.5; 1.6 kriterijai). Kol kas sprendžiama kurie biotopai turi būti stebimi, kokia tinkamiausia monitoringo metodika pritaikoma, vertinimo metodika pradinėje stadijoje ir GAB ribinių verčių kol kas nėra. Taip pat planuojama vykdyti buveinių monitoringą išskirtinėje ekonominėje zonoje. Tačiau kaip priekrantinėje dalyje, taip ir atviroje jūros dalyje tiek monitoringo, tiek vertinimo metodika kol kas tik rengimo stadijoje tiek nacionaliniu, tiek regioniniu mastu.
2018 metais numatytas kieto grunto buveinių vertinimo, stebėsenos metodikos parengimas/įteisinimas, 2020-2021 metais – stebėsenos pradžia.
Daugiau informacijos pdf ataskaitoje.
|
|
Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Environmental target | 4 |
4 |
4 |
Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Associated indicator | 1.6.1 1.7.1 4.2.1 a 4.2.1 b 4.3.1 a 4.3.1 b 4.3.1 c 4.3.1 d 4.3.1 e 4.3.1 f |
1.6.1 1.7.1 4.2.1 a 4.2.1 b 4.3.1 a 4.3.1 b 4.3.1 c 4.3.1 d 4.3.1 e 4.3.1 f |
6.2.2 a 6.2.2 b |
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_SuitableData | Y |
Y |
N |
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_EstablishedMethods | Y |
Y |
N |
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6d_AdequateCapacity | Y |
Y |
N |
Q6c - Target updating | Y |
Y |
N |
|
Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment |
Kasmet vertinama būklė naudojant monitoringo duomenis pagal geros aplinkos būklės rodiklius.
2015 metais numatoma patikslinti tikslus ir susijusius rodiklius. Tuomet bus vertinamas monitoringo pakankamumas ir adekvatumas vertinant tikslų pažangą.
|
Kasmet vertinama būklė naudojant monitoringo duomenis pagal geros aplinkos būklės rodiklius.
2015 metais numatoma patikslinti tikslus ir susijusius rodiklius. Tuomet bus vertinamas monitoringo pakankamumas ir adekvatumas vertinant tikslų pažangą.
|
Monitoringo programa leis toliau vertinti buveinių būklę pagal bentoso kokybės indeksą (BQI). Taip pat tikslai bus peržiūrėti ir patikslinti 2015 metų pirmoje pusėje ir tuomet bus vertinamas monitoringo adekvatumas ir jo pakankamumas vertinant tikslų pažangą. Pagal poreikį programa bus tobulinama.
|
|
Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment | By2018 |
By2018 |
After2020 |
|
Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment |
See 5h answer.
|
See 5h answer.
|
See 5h answer
|
|
Q7a - Relevant activities |
|
|
|
|
Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities |
Tyrimų vietų išdėstymas pakankamai apims vertinamos akvatorijos gamtinių sąlygų įvairovę bei galimą žmogaus veiklos poveikį.
|
Tyrimų vietų išdėstymas pakankamai apims vertinamos akvatorijos gamtinių sąlygų įvairovę bei galimą žmogaus veiklos poveikį.
|
Nacionalinis monitoringas yra būklę vertinantis pagal makrozoobentosą. Monitoringo vietos yra paskirstytos atsižvelgiant į ūkinių veiklų ir jų galimo poveikio zonas. Monitoringas vykdomas ir tose teritorijose, kur vykdomas uoste kasamo grunto gramzdinimas jūroje. Papildomai šiose vietose vykdomas specialus monitoringas, siekiant vertinti uosto ūkinės veiklos poveikį jūros aplinkos būklei: vertinama būklė pačiame dampingo rajone ir jo poveikio zonoje. Taip pat yra vertinama paplūdimių smėlio papildymo poveikis.
|
|
Q7c - Relevant measures | ||||
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate data | Y |
Y |
N |
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Established methods | Y |
Y |
N |
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES | Y |
Y |
N |
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate capacity | Y |
Y |
Y |
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures | Y |
Y |
Y |
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures | Y |
Y |
N |
Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures |
Priemonių programa rengiama. Numatyta prioretizuoti poveikius ir pavojus, kuriems būtinos priemonės. Atsižvelgiant į siūlomas priemones numatyta patikslinti tikslus ir susijusius rodiklius bei įvertinti kokią įtaką turės (atskirai kiekvienos priemonės ir integruotas poveikis) priemonės. Atitinkamai bus vertinamas monitoringo programos pakankamumas. Taip pat regiono mastu yra planuojamos bendros visam regionui priemonės. Pasiūlytos priemonės bus svarstomos ir esant reikalui planuojamos įgyvendinti.
|
Priemonių programa rengiama. Numatyta prioretizuoti poveikius ir pavojus, kuriems būtinos priemonės. Atsižvelgiant į siūlomas priemones numatyta patikslinti tikslus ir susijusius rodiklius bei įvertinti kokią įtaką turės (atskirai kiekvienos priemonės ir integruotas poveikis) priemonės. Atitinkamai bus vertinamas monitoringo programos pakankamumas. Taip pat regiono mastu yra planuojamos bendros visam regionui priemonės. Pasiūlytos priemonės bus svarstomos ir esant reikalui planuojamos įgyvendinti.
|
||
Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures | By2018 |
By2018 |
After2020 |
|
Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes |
|
|
|
|
Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme ID | |||
Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme name | Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme ID | |||
Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme name | Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Q4k - Monitoring purpose | ||||
Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions | ||||
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Habitats |
|
|
|
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Species list |
|
|
|
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Physical/Chemical features |
|
|
|
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Pressures |
|
|
|
Q9a - Elements | ||||
Q5a - GES criteria | Relevant GES criteria |
|
|
|
Q5b - GES indicators | Relevant GES indicators |
|
|
|
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species distribution | |||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population size | |||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population characteristics | |||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species impacts | |||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat distribution | |||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat extent | |||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (physical-chemical) | |||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (biological) | |||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat impacts | |||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure input | |||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure output | |||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) | Activity | |||
Q9b Parameters monitored (other) | Other | |||
Q41 Spatial scope | ||||
Q4j - Description of spatial scope | ||||
Marine Unit IDs |
|
|
|
|
Q4h - Temporal scope | Start date- End date | - |
- |
- |
Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling | ||||
Q9c - Monitoring method | ||||
Q9d - Description of alteration to method | ||||
Q9e - Quality assurance | ||||
Q9f - Quality control | ||||
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - Proportion of area covered % | |||
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - No. of samples | |||
Q9i - Description of sample representivity | ||||
Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data | ||||
Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data | ||||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data type | |||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access mechanism | |||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access rights | |||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - INSPIRE standard | |||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c Date data are available | |||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data update frequency | |||
Q10d - Description of data access | ||||
Descriptor |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.6 – Biological diversity – pelagic habitats” is to assess the status of pelagic habitats by collecting data on species composition, abundance and biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, as well as the physical and chemical conditions influencing their distribution and diversity. Following monitoring programmes produce data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the marine environment: "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Water column – physical characteristics", "Water column – chemical characteristics", "Nutrients in the water column", "Hydrological characteristics", "Ice", and "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions". The main anthropogenic pressure to the pelagic habitats is the input of nutrients that is monitored in the frames of the programme “Inputs of nutrients and hazardous substances – land-based sources”. Information on the uses and human activities affecting the pelagic habitats is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Gaps and plans |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Monitoring frequency in the coastal water bodies (once per 6-year period, excluding monitoring areas with high monitoring frequency) does not provide sufficient data that could give a good overview of whether and to what extent human activities influence phytoplankton species composition, abundance, and biomass. The effect of anthropogenic pressures (eg nutrient levels) may be overridden by meteorological and hydrophysical conditions during the observations.
Microzooplankton is not fully covered by monitoring. Zooplankton sampling methods need to be developed for shallow areas also (currently ZP monitoring methods require water depth at least 7 m).
„Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups“ and „Zooplankton mean size and total stock“ indicators’ thresholds are not developed nor agreed for all sub-basins.
For new methods as automated image analysis, HPLC pigment analysis, DNA sequencing, etc that could help to increase the frequency of monitoring, additional studies and pilot monitoring projects are needed as well as parallel measurement sessions during a long-time period.
As only two status indicators have been currently used in an assessment, the need for additional indicators is under discussion (e.g. indicator „Zooplankton species diversity“ is being developed in cooperation with HELCOM). |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of measures |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D010405-10_Phytop |
BALEE-D010405-10_Phytop |
BALEE-D010405-10_Phytop |
BALEE-D010405-11_Zoopl |
BALEE-D010405-11_Zoopl |
BALEE-D010405-11_Zoopl |
BALEE-D02-18_NISRiskAreas |
BALEE-D02-18_NISRiskAreas |
BALEE-D02-18_NISRiskAreas |
BALEE-D02-18_NISRiskAreas |
BALEE-D02-19_NISDynImpact |
BALEE-D02-19_NISDynImpact |
BALEE-D05-21_AlgalBlooms |
BALEE-D05-21_AlgalBlooms |
BALEE-D05-23_NutrientWaterColumn |
BALEE-D05-23_NutrientWaterColumn |
BALEE-D05-24_WaterColumnChem |
BALEE-D05-24_WaterColumnChem |
BALEE-D05-24_WaterColumnChem |
BALEE-D0507-25_WaterColumnPhys |
BALEE-D0507-25_WaterColumnPhys |
BALEE-D0507-25_WaterColumnPhys |
BALEE-D0507-25_WaterColumnPhys |
BALEE-D0507-25_WaterColumnPhys |
BALEE-D0507-25_WaterColumnPhys |
BALEE-D0507-25_WaterColumnPhys |
BALEE-D07-26_PhysCharWaves |
BALEE-D07-26_PhysCharWaves |
BALEE-D07-26_PhysCharWaves |
BALEE-D07-26_PhysCharWaves |
BALEE-D07-26_PhysCharWaves |
BALEE-D07-26_PhysCharWaves |
BALEE-D07-27_Ice |
Programme name |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions |
Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions |
Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions |
Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions |
Non-indigenous species – abundance and biomass |
Non-indigenous species – abundance and biomass |
Harmful blooms (remote sensing) |
Harmful blooms (remote sensing) |
Nutrient levels in water column |
Nutrient levels in water column |
Water column – chemical characteristics |
Water column – chemical characteristics |
Water column – chemical characteristics |
Water column – physical characteristics |
Water column – physical characteristics |
Water column – physical characteristics |
Water column – physical characteristics |
Water column – physical characteristics |
Water column – physical characteristics |
Water column – physical characteristics |
Hydrological characteristics |
Hydrological characteristics |
Hydrological characteristics |
Hydrological characteristics |
Hydrological characteristics |
Hydrological characteristics |
Ice cover |
Update type |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Programme description |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor phytoplankton communities (species composition, abundance, biomass and seasonal cycle of dominant groups) in the water column. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems” and “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C2, Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C6 and Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C1. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM divisions) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 5 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). The threshold values for the indicator of seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups are still missing for some assessment units of the Baltic Sea (incl. Estonian marine area), mainly due to the lack of data corresponding to the set criteria.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor phytoplankton communities (species composition, abundance, biomass and seasonal cycle of dominant groups) in the water column. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems” and “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C2, Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C6 and Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C1. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM divisions) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 5 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). The threshold values for the indicator of seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups are still missing for some assessment units of the Baltic Sea (incl. Estonian marine area), mainly due to the lack of data corresponding to the set criteria.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor phytoplankton communities (species composition, abundance, biomass and seasonal cycle of dominant groups) in the water column. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems” and “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C2, Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C6 and Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C1. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM divisions) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 5 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). The threshold values for the indicator of seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups are still missing for some assessment units of the Baltic Sea (incl. Estonian marine area), mainly due to the lack of data corresponding to the set criteria.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor species composition, abundance and biomass of mesozooplankton. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, as well as “SD2-Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptors D1, Criterion D1C6, Description D2 Criterions D2C1 and D2C2 and Descriptor D4 Criterion D4C2. Data are gathered to assess the state of the marine environment and environmental status in three coastal water bodies and all off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions) as well as pressures from/by non-indigenous species. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a frequency 10 times a year at the designated coastal monitoring stations (3 stations in each coastal water body) and with frequency twice a year for 16 stations in the Estonian off-shore areas. The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). Mesozooplankton Mean Size Total Stock indicator is developed by HELCOM on the basis of mesozooplankton data. The threshold values for the indicator have been internationally agreed for some sub-basins, but not for the Gulf of Riga yet.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor species composition, abundance and biomass of mesozooplankton. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, as well as “SD2-Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptors D1, Criterion D1C6, Description D2 Criterions D2C1 and D2C2 and Descriptor D4 Criterion D4C2. Data are gathered to assess the state of the marine environment and environmental status in three coastal water bodies and all off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions) as well as pressures from/by non-indigenous species. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a frequency 10 times a year at the designated coastal monitoring stations (3 stations in each coastal water body) and with frequency twice a year for 16 stations in the Estonian off-shore areas. The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). Mesozooplankton Mean Size Total Stock indicator is developed by HELCOM on the basis of mesozooplankton data. The threshold values for the indicator have been internationally agreed for some sub-basins, but not for the Gulf of Riga yet.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor species composition, abundance and biomass of mesozooplankton. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, as well as “SD2-Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptors D1, Criterion D1C6, Description D2 Criterions D2C1 and D2C2 and Descriptor D4 Criterion D4C2. Data are gathered to assess the state of the marine environment and environmental status in three coastal water bodies and all off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions) as well as pressures from/by non-indigenous species. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a frequency 10 times a year at the designated coastal monitoring stations (3 stations in each coastal water body) and with frequency twice a year for 16 stations in the Estonian off-shore areas. The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). Mesozooplankton Mean Size Total Stock indicator is developed by HELCOM on the basis of mesozooplankton data. The threshold values for the indicator have been internationally agreed for some sub-basins, but not for the Gulf of Riga yet.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the occurrence and abundance/biomass of non-indigenous phytoplankton, zooplankton, macrozoobenthos and fish in harbours and adjacent areas. Port NIS monitoring is carried out in one port (Muuga) with the identified highest risk for introduction of new non-indigenous species, while monitoring of adjacent areas is performed for three harbours. In addition, species-specific monitoring covers a few most invasive non-indigenous species: the round goby Neogobius melanostomus, Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis and Harris mud crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii. The programme provides data to monitoring strategy “SD2 – Non-indigenous species ”. The programme is primarily related to GES Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3; but also contributes to D1, D4 and D6. Monitoring is conducted annually at the designated monitoring stations with organism-group specific monitoring designs. The monitoring, data collection and assessment quality are assured by regional coordination via HELCOM, including following the OSPAR/HELCOM port biological monitoring guidelines. The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March).
The programme has been modified since 2014 by adding species-specific monitoring.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Non-indigenous species inputs - from specific sources; Non-indigenous species - abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the occurrence and abundance/biomass of non-indigenous phytoplankton, zooplankton, macrozoobenthos and fish in harbours and adjacent areas. Port NIS monitoring is carried out in one port (Muuga) with the identified highest risk for introduction of new non-indigenous species, while monitoring of adjacent areas is performed for three harbours. In addition, species-specific monitoring covers a few most invasive non-indigenous species: the round goby Neogobius melanostomus, Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis and Harris mud crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii. The programme provides data to monitoring strategy “SD2 – Non-indigenous species ”. The programme is primarily related to GES Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3; but also contributes to D1, D4 and D6. Monitoring is conducted annually at the designated monitoring stations with organism-group specific monitoring designs. The monitoring, data collection and assessment quality are assured by regional coordination via HELCOM, including following the OSPAR/HELCOM port biological monitoring guidelines. The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March).
The programme has been modified since 2014 by adding species-specific monitoring.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Non-indigenous species inputs - from specific sources; Non-indigenous species - abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the occurrence and abundance/biomass of non-indigenous phytoplankton, zooplankton, macrozoobenthos and fish in harbours and adjacent areas. Port NIS monitoring is carried out in one port (Muuga) with the identified highest risk for introduction of new non-indigenous species, while monitoring of adjacent areas is performed for three harbours. In addition, species-specific monitoring covers a few most invasive non-indigenous species: the round goby Neogobius melanostomus, Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis and Harris mud crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii. The programme provides data to monitoring strategy “SD2 – Non-indigenous species ”. The programme is primarily related to GES Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3; but also contributes to D1, D4 and D6. Monitoring is conducted annually at the designated monitoring stations with organism-group specific monitoring designs. The monitoring, data collection and assessment quality are assured by regional coordination via HELCOM, including following the OSPAR/HELCOM port biological monitoring guidelines. The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March).
The programme has been modified since 2014 by adding species-specific monitoring.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Non-indigenous species inputs - from specific sources; Non-indigenous species - abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the occurrence and abundance/biomass of non-indigenous phytoplankton, zooplankton, macrozoobenthos and fish in harbours and adjacent areas. Port NIS monitoring is carried out in one port (Muuga) with the identified highest risk for introduction of new non-indigenous species, while monitoring of adjacent areas is performed for three harbours. In addition, species-specific monitoring covers a few most invasive non-indigenous species: the round goby Neogobius melanostomus, Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis and Harris mud crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii. The programme provides data to monitoring strategy “SD2 – Non-indigenous species ”. The programme is primarily related to GES Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3; but also contributes to D1, D4 and D6. Monitoring is conducted annually at the designated monitoring stations with organism-group specific monitoring designs. The monitoring, data collection and assessment quality are assured by regional coordination via HELCOM, including following the OSPAR/HELCOM port biological monitoring guidelines. The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March).
The programme has been modified since 2014 by adding species-specific monitoring.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Non-indigenous species inputs - from specific sources; Non-indigenous species - abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to cover all major organism groups (phyto/zooplankton, phyto/zoobenthos, fish) and monitor both, pelagic and benthic communities (abundance/biomass and proportion of non-indigenous species in zooplankton and macrozoobenthos communities, abundance/biomass of mobile species, and biopollution level index). Most of the data and information used originate from other monitoring strategies and programmes. The programme provides data to monitoring strategy “SD2 – Non-indigenous species ”. The programme is primarily related to GES Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3; but also contributes to D1, D4 and D6. Monitoring is conducted annually at the designated monitoring stations with organism-group specific monitoring designs. The assessment unit is the whole Estonian marine area. The monitoring and assessment quality is assured by regional coordination via HELCOM and following the HELCOM monitoring guidelines. The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). The threshold values for indicators required for MSFD assessments have been defined (nationally, except for the biopollution level).
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Non-indigenous species - abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to cover all major organism groups (phyto/zooplankton, phyto/zoobenthos, fish) and monitor both, pelagic and benthic communities (abundance/biomass and proportion of non-indigenous species in zooplankton and macrozoobenthos communities, abundance/biomass of mobile species, and biopollution level index). Most of the data and information used originate from other monitoring strategies and programmes. The programme provides data to monitoring strategy “SD2 – Non-indigenous species ”. The programme is primarily related to GES Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3; but also contributes to D1, D4 and D6. Monitoring is conducted annually at the designated monitoring stations with organism-group specific monitoring designs. The assessment unit is the whole Estonian marine area. The monitoring and assessment quality is assured by regional coordination via HELCOM and following the HELCOM monitoring guidelines. The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). The threshold values for indicators required for MSFD assessments have been defined (nationally, except for the biopollution level).
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Non-indigenous species - abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the surface accumulation of phytoplankton using remote sensing data. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C3. The status of mostly off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions) is assessed. Monitoring is conducted continuously. The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM, and commonly developed and agreed algorithms are used. Algorithms and assessment methods (thresholds) are under development.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes: the satellites in use have been changed.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the surface accumulation of phytoplankton using remote sensing data. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C3. The status of mostly off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions) is assessed. Monitoring is conducted continuously. The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM, and commonly developed and agreed algorithms are used. Algorithms and assessment methods (thresholds) are under development.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes: the satellites in use have been changed.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor nutrient levels (total nitrogen, total phosphorus, NO3+NO2-N, NH4-N, PO4-P, SiO4-Si) in the water column. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C1 and anthropogenic pressure “Input of nutrients” (MSFD Annex III). Data are gathered to assess the pressure levels in the marine environment and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May). The threshold values for the indicators of concentrations of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in coastal waters have still to be developed. The programme is not designed to assess the internal and transboundary loads of nutrients.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – chemical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor nutrient levels (total nitrogen, total phosphorus, NO3+NO2-N, NH4-N, PO4-P, SiO4-Si) in the water column. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C1 and anthropogenic pressure “Input of nutrients” (MSFD Annex III). Data are gathered to assess the pressure levels in the marine environment and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May). The threshold values for the indicators of concentrations of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in coastal waters have still to be developed. The programme is not designed to assess the internal and transboundary loads of nutrients.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – chemical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor chemical characteristics in the water column (including near-bottom layer) to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe conditions of the pelagic and benthic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C5. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country. Data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May). Monitoring of pCO2 is not continuous yet.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – chemical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor chemical characteristics in the water column (including near-bottom layer) to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe conditions of the pelagic and benthic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C5. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country. Data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May). Monitoring of pCO2 is not continuous yet.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – chemical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor chemical characteristics in the water column (including near-bottom layer) to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe conditions of the pelagic and benthic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C5. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country. Data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May). Monitoring of pCO2 is not continuous yet.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – chemical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor physical characteristics (water temperature, salinity, transparency) in the water column to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe the physical conditions of the pelagic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C4. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in the coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country (except CMEMS/BOOS monitoring with joint data collection). The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March), HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May) and online data delivery into CMEMS/BOOS databases.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – physical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor physical characteristics (water temperature, salinity, transparency) in the water column to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe the physical conditions of the pelagic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C4. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in the coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country (except CMEMS/BOOS monitoring with joint data collection). The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March), HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May) and online data delivery into CMEMS/BOOS databases.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – physical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor physical characteristics (water temperature, salinity, transparency) in the water column to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe the physical conditions of the pelagic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C4. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in the coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country (except CMEMS/BOOS monitoring with joint data collection). The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March), HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May) and online data delivery into CMEMS/BOOS databases.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – physical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor physical characteristics (water temperature, salinity, transparency) in the water column to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe the physical conditions of the pelagic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C4. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in the coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country (except CMEMS/BOOS monitoring with joint data collection). The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March), HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May) and online data delivery into CMEMS/BOOS databases.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – physical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor physical characteristics (water temperature, salinity, transparency) in the water column to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe the physical conditions of the pelagic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C4. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in the coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country (except CMEMS/BOOS monitoring with joint data collection). The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March), HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May) and online data delivery into CMEMS/BOOS databases.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – physical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor physical characteristics (water temperature, salinity, transparency) in the water column to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe the physical conditions of the pelagic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C4. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in the coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country (except CMEMS/BOOS monitoring with joint data collection). The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March), HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May) and online data delivery into CMEMS/BOOS databases.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – physical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor physical characteristics (water temperature, salinity, transparency) in the water column to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe the physical conditions of the pelagic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C4. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in the coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country (except CMEMS/BOOS monitoring with joint data collection). The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March), HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May) and online data delivery into CMEMS/BOOS databases.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – physical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor hydrological characteristics in the marine areas to describe the physical/hydrological conditions of the benthic and pelagic habitats. Data on sea level, waves, and currents are acquired at sea, mostly using autonomous devices and numerical models. Both, coastal water bodies and the off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) are monitored. Monitoring is conducted continuously. The program is regionally coordinated via BOOS and Baltic CMEMS (joint data collection). The data are delivered near real-time.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – hydrological characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor hydrological characteristics in the marine areas to describe the physical/hydrological conditions of the benthic and pelagic habitats. Data on sea level, waves, and currents are acquired at sea, mostly using autonomous devices and numerical models. Both, coastal water bodies and the off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) are monitored. Monitoring is conducted continuously. The program is regionally coordinated via BOOS and Baltic CMEMS (joint data collection). The data are delivered near real-time.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – hydrological characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor hydrological characteristics in the marine areas to describe the physical/hydrological conditions of the benthic and pelagic habitats. Data on sea level, waves, and currents are acquired at sea, mostly using autonomous devices and numerical models. Both, coastal water bodies and the off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) are monitored. Monitoring is conducted continuously. The program is regionally coordinated via BOOS and Baltic CMEMS (joint data collection). The data are delivered near real-time.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – hydrological characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor hydrological characteristics in the marine areas to describe the physical/hydrological conditions of the benthic and pelagic habitats. Data on sea level, waves, and currents are acquired at sea, mostly using autonomous devices and numerical models. Both, coastal water bodies and the off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) are monitored. Monitoring is conducted continuously. The program is regionally coordinated via BOOS and Baltic CMEMS (joint data collection). The data are delivered near real-time.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – hydrological characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor hydrological characteristics in the marine areas to describe the physical/hydrological conditions of the benthic and pelagic habitats. Data on sea level, waves, and currents are acquired at sea, mostly using autonomous devices and numerical models. Both, coastal water bodies and the off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) are monitored. Monitoring is conducted continuously. The program is regionally coordinated via BOOS and Baltic CMEMS (joint data collection). The data are delivered near real-time.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – hydrological characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor hydrological characteristics in the marine areas to describe the physical/hydrological conditions of the benthic and pelagic habitats. Data on sea level, waves, and currents are acquired at sea, mostly using autonomous devices and numerical models. Both, coastal water bodies and the off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) are monitored. Monitoring is conducted continuously. The program is regionally coordinated via BOOS and Baltic CMEMS (joint data collection). The data are delivered near real-time.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – hydrological characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor characteristics of the ice cover. Data are collected by visual observations and remote sensing. Both, coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions) are monitored. Monitoring is conducted continuously during winter. The program is regionally coordinated (joint data collection) via Baltic Sea Ice Services and a common product is produced. The data are delivered daily.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Ice cover. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Joint data collection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Monitoring details |
Phytoplankton samples are collected with a bathometer at water depths of 1, 5 and 10 m together with samples of seawater chlorophyll a. An integrated sample is made pooling equal amounts of water collected from fixed depths. When the integrated sample is thoroughly mixed, a portion is poured into a clear glass bottle and fixed with preservation chemical for further transport, storage and analysis of the phytoplankton sample. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner. Phytoplankton is analysed according to the relevant international standard methods (EN 16695: 2015, HELCOM Monitoring Manual).
In 3 coastal water bodies sampling is carried out annually 10-12 times per year (from April to October), Haapsalu coastal waterbody - 10-12 times every third year. Other coastal water bodies are monitored in rotation 6 times per year (from June to September) at least once during a 6-year period. In the off-shore areas the research vessel-based monitoring is conducted 5 times per year (from April to October) and 12 times every year in frames of Ferrybox monitoring. |
Phytoplankton samples are collected with a bathometer at water depths of 1, 5 and 10 m together with samples of seawater chlorophyll a. An integrated sample is made pooling equal amounts of water collected from fixed depths. When the integrated sample is thoroughly mixed, a portion is poured into a clear glass bottle and fixed with preservation chemical for further transport, storage and analysis of the phytoplankton sample. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner. Phytoplankton is analysed according to the relevant international standard methods (EN 16695: 2015, HELCOM Monitoring Manual).
In 3 coastal water bodies sampling is carried out annually 10-12 times per year (from April to October), Haapsalu coastal waterbody - 10-12 times every third year. Other coastal water bodies are monitored in rotation 6 times per year (from June to September) at least once during a 6-year period. In the off-shore areas the research vessel-based monitoring is conducted 5 times per year (from April to October) and 12 times every year in frames of Ferrybox monitoring. |
Phytoplankton samples are collected with a bathometer at water depths of 1, 5 and 10 m together with samples of seawater chlorophyll a. An integrated sample is made pooling equal amounts of water collected from fixed depths. When the integrated sample is thoroughly mixed, a portion is poured into a clear glass bottle and fixed with preservation chemical for further transport, storage and analysis of the phytoplankton sample. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner. Phytoplankton is analysed according to the relevant international standard methods (EN 16695: 2015, HELCOM Monitoring Manual).
In 3 coastal water bodies sampling is carried out annually 10-12 times per year (from April to October), Haapsalu coastal waterbody - 10-12 times every third year. Other coastal water bodies are monitored in rotation 6 times per year (from June to September) at least once during a 6-year period. In the off-shore areas the research vessel-based monitoring is conducted 5 times per year (from April to October) and 12 times every year in frames of Ferrybox monitoring. |
The samples are collected by means of vertical hauls using a Juday or WP-2 net with 0,1 mm mesh size. The collected samples are preserved in a formaldehyde solution to microscopic analysis to be performed in a laboratory. |
The samples are collected by means of vertical hauls using a Juday or WP-2 net with 0,1 mm mesh size. The collected samples are preserved in a formaldehyde solution to microscopic analysis to be performed in a laboratory. |
The samples are collected by means of vertical hauls using a Juday or WP-2 net with 0,1 mm mesh size. The collected samples are preserved in a formaldehyde solution to microscopic analysis to be performed in a laboratory. |
The phytoplankton, mesozooplankton, zoobenthos, fouling, mobile epifauna and fish monitoring samples are collected in accordance with HELCOM and HELCOM/OSPAR guidelines from two ports and three adjacent areas. Information on NIS occurrence is also gathered from all biological monitoring stations. |
The phytoplankton, mesozooplankton, zoobenthos, fouling, mobile epifauna and fish monitoring samples are collected in accordance with HELCOM and HELCOM/OSPAR guidelines from two ports and three adjacent areas. Information on NIS occurrence is also gathered from all biological monitoring stations. |
The phytoplankton, mesozooplankton, zoobenthos, fouling, mobile epifauna and fish monitoring samples are collected in accordance with HELCOM and HELCOM/OSPAR guidelines from two ports and three adjacent areas. Information on NIS occurrence is also gathered from all biological monitoring stations. |
The phytoplankton, mesozooplankton, zoobenthos, fouling, mobile epifauna and fish monitoring samples are collected in accordance with HELCOM and HELCOM/OSPAR guidelines from two ports and three adjacent areas. Information on NIS occurrence is also gathered from all biological monitoring stations. |
Most of the data and information used originate from other monitoring strategies and programmes. Information on NIS occurrence is gathered from all biological monitoring stations. |
Most of the data and information used originate from other monitoring strategies and programmes. Information on NIS occurrence is gathered from all biological monitoring stations. |
The monitoring and related indicator(s) are under development. Local applicable algorithms for Sentinel satellites data need to be developed. |
The monitoring and related indicator(s) are under development. Local applicable algorithms for Sentinel satellites data need to be developed. |
Samples are collected from designated monitoring stations with a bathometer at depths of 1, 5 and 10 m and near-bottom layer. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner with installed equipment.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas the monitoring is conducted 6 times per year and during winter cruise. In addition, samples are collected in frames of Ferrybox monitoring, 12 times every year in the period from April to October. |
Samples are collected from designated monitoring stations with a bathometer at depths of 1, 5 and 10 m and near-bottom layer. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner with installed equipment.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas the monitoring is conducted 6 times per year and during winter cruise. In addition, samples are collected in frames of Ferrybox monitoring, 12 times every year in the period from April to October. |
Dissolved oxygen concentration is measured at designated monitoring stations either in situ with CTD sonde oxygen sensors or in a laboratory from samples collected with a bathometer (surface layer and near-bottom layer). International guidelines are followed measuring H2S, pH and dissolved oxygen concentrations. H2S is measured at deepest monitoring stations in particular.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. |
Dissolved oxygen concentration is measured at designated monitoring stations either in situ with CTD sonde oxygen sensors or in a laboratory from samples collected with a bathometer (surface layer and near-bottom layer). International guidelines are followed measuring H2S, pH and dissolved oxygen concentrations. H2S is measured at deepest monitoring stations in particular.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. |
Dissolved oxygen concentration is measured at designated monitoring stations either in situ with CTD sonde oxygen sensors or in a laboratory from samples collected with a bathometer (surface layer and near-bottom layer). International guidelines are followed measuring H2S, pH and dissolved oxygen concentrations. H2S is measured at deepest monitoring stations in particular.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. |
The temperature is measured within water column from surface to bottom with CTD sondes. Transparency is assessed with 30 cm diameter white Secchi disk. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, the temperature and salinity are registered at depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner with automatic equipment. CTD water column measurements of temperature and salinity are also being performed at autonomous monitoring buoys.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. Ferrybox, remote (satellite) measurements and measurements at autonomous buoys are being conducted continuously. |
The temperature is measured within water column from surface to bottom with CTD sondes. Transparency is assessed with 30 cm diameter white Secchi disk. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, the temperature and salinity are registered at depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner with automatic equipment. CTD water column measurements of temperature and salinity are also being performed at autonomous monitoring buoys.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. Ferrybox, remote (satellite) measurements and measurements at autonomous buoys are being conducted continuously. |
The temperature is measured within water column from surface to bottom with CTD sondes. Transparency is assessed with 30 cm diameter white Secchi disk. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, the temperature and salinity are registered at depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner with automatic equipment. CTD water column measurements of temperature and salinity are also being performed at autonomous monitoring buoys.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. Ferrybox, remote (satellite) measurements and measurements at autonomous buoys are being conducted continuously. |
The temperature is measured within water column from surface to bottom with CTD sondes. Transparency is assessed with 30 cm diameter white Secchi disk. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, the temperature and salinity are registered at depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner with automatic equipment. CTD water column measurements of temperature and salinity are also being performed at autonomous monitoring buoys.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. Ferrybox, remote (satellite) measurements and measurements at autonomous buoys are being conducted continuously. |
The temperature is measured within water column from surface to bottom with CTD sondes. Transparency is assessed with 30 cm diameter white Secchi disk. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, the temperature and salinity are registered at depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner with automatic equipment. CTD water column measurements of temperature and salinity are also being performed at autonomous monitoring buoys.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. Ferrybox, remote (satellite) measurements and measurements at autonomous buoys are being conducted continuously. |
The temperature is measured within water column from surface to bottom with CTD sondes. Transparency is assessed with 30 cm diameter white Secchi disk. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, the temperature and salinity are registered at depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner with automatic equipment. CTD water column measurements of temperature and salinity are also being performed at autonomous monitoring buoys.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. Ferrybox, remote (satellite) measurements and measurements at autonomous buoys are being conducted continuously. |
The temperature is measured within water column from surface to bottom with CTD sondes. Transparency is assessed with 30 cm diameter white Secchi disk. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, the temperature and salinity are registered at depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner with automatic equipment. CTD water column measurements of temperature and salinity are also being performed at autonomous monitoring buoys.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. Ferrybox, remote (satellite) measurements and measurements at autonomous buoys are being conducted continuously. |
Monitoring is conducted at stations with automatic measurement equipment installed (water level, waves and currents measurements). |
Monitoring is conducted at stations with automatic measurement equipment installed (water level, waves and currents measurements). |
Monitoring is conducted at stations with automatic measurement equipment installed (water level, waves and currents measurements). |
Monitoring is conducted at stations with automatic measurement equipment installed (water level, waves and currents measurements). |
Monitoring is conducted at stations with automatic measurement equipment installed (water level, waves and currents measurements). |
Monitoring is conducted at stations with automatic measurement equipment installed (water level, waves and currents measurements). |
Ice monitoring is carried out as a part of national meteorological and hydrological monitoring (Estonian Environment Agency). Ice maps are produced in cooperation with Baltic Sea countries. TalTech Marine Systems Institute performs remote monitoring of ice on a project basis in cooperation with other Baltic Sea countries. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
Aquaculture – marine, including infrastructure
|
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)
|
Hunting and collecting for other purposes
|
Marine plant harvesting
|
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)
|
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure
|
Extraction of water
|
Military operations (subject to Article 2(2))
|
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables)
|
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure
|
Research, survey and educational activities
|
Coastal defence and flood protection
|
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables)
|
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials
|
Tourism and leisure activities
|
Tourism and leisure infrastructure
|
Transport infrastructure
|
Transport – shipping
|
Waste treatment and disposal
|
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
|
Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
|
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
|
Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Eutrophication
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Aquaculture – marine, including infrastructure
|
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)
|
Hunting and collecting for other purposes
|
Marine plant harvesting
|
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)
|
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure
|
Extraction of water
|
Military operations (subject to Article 2(2))
|
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables)
|
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure
|
Research, survey and educational activities
|
Coastal defence and flood protection
|
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables)
|
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials
|
Tourism and leisure activities
|
Tourism and leisure infrastructure
|
Transport infrastructure
|
Transport – shipping
|
Waste treatment and disposal
|
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
|
Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
|
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
|
Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Eutrophication
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
|
Aquaculture – marine, including infrastructure
|
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)
|
Hunting and collecting for other purposes
|
Marine plant harvesting
|
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)
|
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure
|
Extraction of water
|
Military operations (subject to Article 2(2))
|
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables)
|
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure
|
Research, survey and educational activities
|
Coastal defence and flood protection
|
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables)
|
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials
|
Tourism and leisure activities
|
Tourism and leisure infrastructure
|
Transport infrastructure
|
Transport – shipping
|
Waste treatment and disposal
|
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
|
Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
|
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
|
Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Eutrophication
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
|
Aquaculture – marine, including infrastructure
|
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)
|
Hunting and collecting for other purposes
|
Marine plant harvesting
|
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)
|
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure
|
Extraction of water
|
Military operations (subject to Article 2(2))
|
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables)
|
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure
|
Research, survey and educational activities
|
Coastal defence and flood protection
|
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables)
|
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials
|
Tourism and leisure activities
|
Tourism and leisure infrastructure
|
Transport infrastructure
|
Transport – shipping
|
Waste treatment and disposal
|
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
|
Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
|
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
|
Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Eutrophication
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Physical and hydrological characteristics
|
|
Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES criteria |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
D1C6 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D1C6 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D2C1 |
D2C2 |
D2C2 |
D2C2 |
D2C1 |
D2C2 |
D1C6 |
D5C3 |
D5C1 |
NotRelevan |
D5C1 |
D5C5 |
NotRelevan |
D5C4 |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parameter Other |
Production (tonnes); Area; Nutrient load |
Catch; By-catch |
Number of individuals hunted by species (waterbird |
Amount (kg); Area |
Mining volume; Mining area; Area pressure index |
Pipe length (area); Area pressure index |
Volume |
Number of explosions; Number of trainings; Trainin |
Cable length (area); Area pressure index |
Area; Area pressure index |
Volume of costs on marine researches; Number of re |
Length of defence structure; Coastline pressure in |
Area of structure; Area pressure index |
Soil volume; Extent; Area pressure index |
Number of vacationists; Number of visits; People's |
Number of marinas per coastline; Length of beach |
Area; Volume (goods and passengers); Number of loa |
Number of ships (incl. number of ships complying w |
Areas of dumping sites and volume of dumped materi |
Pollution load (tonnes/year) - Hg, Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn, |
Amount in sediments; Litter type and material |
Pollution load (tonnes/year) - N, P, BHT5 |
Number of disturbance days - Impulsive underwater |
Species composition; Abundance (number of individu |
Species composition |
Species composition; Abundance (number of individu |
Species composition |
Species composition; Abundance (number of individu |
Species composition; Relative biomass in community |
Species composition |
Species composition; Abundance (number of individu |
Species composition |
Number of bloom events and duration |
Direction |
Water level |
Significant wave height; Period; Direction |
Direction |
Water level |
Significant wave height; Period; Direction |
Extent; Thickness; Concentration; Ice type |
||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
2010-9999 |
2010-9999 |
2010-9999 |
2010-9999 |
2010-9999 |
2010-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
2007-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
Joint HELCOM/OSPAR Guidelines on the granting of exemptions under the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments, Regulation A (https://www.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Joint-HELCOM_OSPAR-Guidelines.pdf); |
Joint HELCOM/OSPAR Guidelines on the granting of exemptions under the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments, Regulation A (https://www.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Joint-HELCOM_OSPAR-Guidelines.pdf); |
Joint HELCOM/OSPAR Guidelines on the granting of exemptions under the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments, Regulation A (https://www.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Joint-HELCOM_OSPAR-Guidelines.pdf); |
Joint HELCOM/OSPAR Guidelines on the granting of exemptions under the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments, Regulation A (https://www.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Joint-HELCOM_OSPAR-Guidelines.pdf); |
The numerical data used are calculated on the basis of data collected under other programmes. The level of biopollution is assessed on the basis of a scientifically validated methodology (Olenin et al. 2007) for an average of three sub-basins (the Gulf of Riga, the Gulf of Finland and the Baltic Proper). |
The numerical data used are calculated on the basis of data collected under other programmes. The level of biopollution is assessed on the basis of a scientifically validated methodology (Olenin et al. 2007) for an average of three sub-basins (the Gulf of Riga, the Gulf of Finland and the Baltic Proper). |
National, under development |
National, under development |
Automatic measurements and mathematical modelling - Copernicus marine service (http://marine.copernicus.eu/) and BOOS (http://www.boos.org/). |
Automatic measurements and mathematical modelling - Copernicus marine service (http://marine.copernicus.eu/) and BOOS (http://www.boos.org/). |
Automatic measurements and mathematical modelling - Copernicus marine service (http://marine.copernicus.eu/) and BOOS (http://www.boos.org/). |
Automatic measurements and mathematical modelling - Copernicus marine service (http://marine.copernicus.eu/) and BOOS (http://www.boos.org/). |
Automatic measurements and mathematical modelling - Copernicus marine service (http://marine.copernicus.eu/) and BOOS (http://www.boos.org/). |
Automatic measurements and mathematical modelling - Copernicus marine service (http://marine.copernicus.eu/) and BOOS (http://www.boos.org/). |
The main characteristics of ice cover are measured using satellite observations or/and in combination - satellite images and visual observations. |
||||||||||||||||||
Quality control |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
The quality is ensured by following the standard methods and HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the standard methods and HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the standard methods and HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by the accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and following guidance recommendations. |
The quality is ensured by the accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and following guidance recommendations. |
The quality is ensured by the accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and following guidance recommendations. |
The quality is ensured by the accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and following guidance recommendations. |
The monitoring and assessment quality is assured by regional coordination via HELCOM, following the HELCOM, HELCOM/OSPAR and national monitoring guidelines, and accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The monitoring and assessment quality is assured by regional coordination via HELCOM, following the HELCOM, HELCOM/OSPAR and national monitoring guidelines, and accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by using regionally developed algorithms and by international collaboration. |
The quality is assured by using regionally developed algorithms and by international collaboration. |
The quality is assured by following the standard methods and HELCOM guidelines, by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is assured by following the standard methods and HELCOM guidelines, by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is assured by following the standards (ISO 5814, EVS-EN ISO 10523) and HELCOM guidelines and CMEMS protocols, by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following the standards (ISO 5814, EVS-EN ISO 10523) and HELCOM guidelines and CMEMS protocols, by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following the standards (ISO 5814, EVS-EN ISO 10523) and HELCOM guidelines and CMEMS protocols, by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following international standards, including CMEMS protocols and HELCOM guidelines, and by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following international standards, including CMEMS protocols and HELCOM guidelines, and by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following international standards, including CMEMS protocols and HELCOM guidelines, and by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following international standards, including CMEMS protocols and HELCOM guidelines, and by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following international standards, including CMEMS protocols and HELCOM guidelines, and by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following international standards, including CMEMS protocols and HELCOM guidelines, and by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following international standards, including CMEMS protocols and HELCOM guidelines, and by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following WMO guidelines (weather service); operational measurements and mathematical modelling are in compliance with Copernicus maritime service quality system. |
The quality is assured by following WMO guidelines (weather service); operational measurements and mathematical modelling are in compliance with Copernicus maritime service quality system. |
The quality is assured by following WMO guidelines (weather service); operational measurements and mathematical modelling are in compliance with Copernicus maritime service quality system. |
The quality is assured by following WMO guidelines (weather service); operational measurements and mathematical modelling are in compliance with Copernicus maritime service quality system. |
The quality is assured by following WMO guidelines (weather service); operational measurements and mathematical modelling are in compliance with Copernicus maritime service quality system. |
The quality is assured by following WMO guidelines (weather service); operational measurements and mathematical modelling are in compliance with Copernicus maritime service quality system. |
WMO and CMEMS quality assurance system (Cal/Val).
|
Data management |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). |
Raw data (excl satellite images) are stored at the national environmental monitoring database KESE. |
Raw data (excl satellite images) are stored at the national environmental monitoring database KESE. |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). The data on autonomous buoys measurements are stored at CMEMS/EMODnet Physics. |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). The data on autonomous buoys measurements are stored at CMEMS/EMODnet Physics. |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). The data on autonomous buoys measurements are stored at CMEMS/EMODnet Physics. |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). The data on autonomous buoys measurements are stored at CMEMS/EMODnet Physics. |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). The data on autonomous buoys measurements are stored at CMEMS/EMODnet Physics. |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). The data on autonomous buoys measurements are stored at CMEMS/EMODnet Physics. |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). The data on autonomous buoys measurements are stored at CMEMS/EMODnet Physics. |
The data are stored at Estonian Environment Agency (Weather Service) in WISKI database, TalTech Marine Systems Institute (BOOS) and CMEMS in situ data. Automatic measurements and modelled data are available through Copernicus Marine Service and/or EMODnet Physics. |
The data are stored at Estonian Environment Agency (Weather Service) in WISKI database, TalTech Marine Systems Institute (BOOS) and CMEMS in situ data. Automatic measurements and modelled data are available through Copernicus Marine Service and/or EMODnet Physics. |
The data are stored at Estonian Environment Agency (Weather Service) in WISKI database, TalTech Marine Systems Institute (BOOS) and CMEMS in situ data. Automatic measurements and modelled data are available through Copernicus Marine Service and/or EMODnet Physics. |
The data are stored at Estonian Environment Agency (Weather Service) in WISKI database, TalTech Marine Systems Institute (BOOS) and CMEMS in situ data. Automatic measurements and modelled data are available through Copernicus Marine Service and/or EMODnet Physics. |
The data are stored at Estonian Environment Agency (Weather Service) in WISKI database, TalTech Marine Systems Institute (BOOS) and CMEMS in situ data. Automatic measurements and modelled data are available through Copernicus Marine Service and/or EMODnet Physics. |
The data are stored at Estonian Environment Agency (Weather Service) in WISKI database, TalTech Marine Systems Institute (BOOS) and CMEMS in situ data. Automatic measurements and modelled data are available through Copernicus Marine Service and/or EMODnet Physics. |
The data are stored at Estonian Environment Agency, TalTech Marine Systems Institute (http://sahm.ttu.ee/balticseapic/index.php?do=ice) and Baltic Sea Ice Services (http://www.bsis-ice.de/). |
Data access |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contact |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
References |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |