Member State report / Art11 / 2020 / D4 / Estonia / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2020-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems |
Member State | Estonia |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Estonian Environment Agency |
Report date | 2020-11-11 |
Report access |
Descriptor |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems" is to assess the status of marine food webs by collecting data on the condition of fish communities and other ecosystem components. The following monitoring programmes produce (directly or indirectly) relevant data for the assessments of the status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: "Coastal fish", "Off-shore fish", "Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass", "Chlorophyll-a", "Macrozoobenthos", "Abundance of wintering birds", "Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season". The main anthropogenic activities and associated pressures are dealt with in the programme "Marine and coastal activities". |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Gaps and plans |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
The monitoring being done according to the strategy provides sufficient data to assess the achievement of targets and the effectiveness of measures implemented. GES indicators for several food webs components as waterbirds, marine mammals etc still need to be developed to provide an assessment of the food web as a whole (preferably in cooperation with HECOM). |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of measures |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-1_BirdsWinter |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-8_FishOffshore |
BALEE-D010403-8_FishOffshore |
BALEE-D010403-8_FishOffshore |
BALEE-D010403-8_FishOffshore |
BALEE-D010403-8_FishOffshore |
BALEE-D010403-8_FishOffshore |
BALEE-D010403-8_FishOffshore |
BALEE-D010405-10_Phytop |
BALEE-D010405-10_Phytop |
BALEE-D010405-10_Phytop |
BALEE-D010405-11_Zoopl |
BALEE-D010405-11_Zoopl |
BALEE-D010405-11_Zoopl |
BALEE-D01040605-14_Macrozoobenthos |
BALEE-D01040605-14_Macrozoobenthos |
BALEE-D01040605-14_Macrozoobenthos |
BALEE-D01040605-14_Macrozoobenthos |
BALEE-D01040605-14_Macrozoobenthos |
BALEE-D01040605-14_Macrozoobenthos |
BALEE-D01040605-14_Macrozoobenthos |
BALEE-D01040605-14_Macrozoobenthos |
BALEE-D01040605-14_Macrozoobenthos |
BALEE-D05-20_PhytopChla |
BALEE-D05-20_PhytopChla |
Programme name |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Marine and coastal activities |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of wintering birds |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Coastal fish |
Off-shore fish |
Off-shore fish |
Off-shore fish |
Off-shore fish |
Off-shore fish |
Off-shore fish |
Off-shore fish |
Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Macrozoobenthos |
Macrozoobenthos |
Macrozoobenthos |
Macrozoobenthos |
Macrozoobenthos |
Macrozoobenthos |
Macrozoobenthos |
Macrozoobenthos |
Macrozoobenthos |
Chlorophyll-a |
Chlorophyll-a |
Update type |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Programme description |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in the Estonian coastal and off-shore areas during the wintering season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C1 and D4C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a goal to cover the whole area (coastal and off-shore areas) every five years. Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The programme (data collection) is regionally coordinated by HELCOM and Wetlands International. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group.
The programme was updated and modified since 2014 by adding the monitoring of the abundance of wintering waterbirds in the off-shore area.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the commercially exploited pelagic fish species – sprat and herring in the offshore areas of the Estonian marine waters. The biomass and fishing mortality of stocks are assessed. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish” and „SD3-commercially exploited fish“. Monitoring is conducted annually. The program is regionally coordinated via ICES and the ICES monitoring manual is followed.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the commercially exploited pelagic fish species – sprat and herring in the offshore areas of the Estonian marine waters. The biomass and fishing mortality of stocks are assessed. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish” and „SD3-commercially exploited fish“. Monitoring is conducted annually. The program is regionally coordinated via ICES and the ICES monitoring manual is followed.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the commercially exploited pelagic fish species – sprat and herring in the offshore areas of the Estonian marine waters. The biomass and fishing mortality of stocks are assessed. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish” and „SD3-commercially exploited fish“. Monitoring is conducted annually. The program is regionally coordinated via ICES and the ICES monitoring manual is followed.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the commercially exploited pelagic fish species – sprat and herring in the offshore areas of the Estonian marine waters. The biomass and fishing mortality of stocks are assessed. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish” and „SD3-commercially exploited fish“. Monitoring is conducted annually. The program is regionally coordinated via ICES and the ICES monitoring manual is followed.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the commercially exploited pelagic fish species – sprat and herring in the offshore areas of the Estonian marine waters. The biomass and fishing mortality of stocks are assessed. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish” and „SD3-commercially exploited fish“. Monitoring is conducted annually. The program is regionally coordinated via ICES and the ICES monitoring manual is followed.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the commercially exploited pelagic fish species – sprat and herring in the offshore areas of the Estonian marine waters. The biomass and fishing mortality of stocks are assessed. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish” and „SD3-commercially exploited fish“. Monitoring is conducted annually. The program is regionally coordinated via ICES and the ICES monitoring manual is followed.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the commercially exploited pelagic fish species – sprat and herring in the offshore areas of the Estonian marine waters. The biomass and fishing mortality of stocks are assessed. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish” and „SD3-commercially exploited fish“. Monitoring is conducted annually. The program is regionally coordinated via ICES and the ICES monitoring manual is followed.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor phytoplankton communities (species composition, abundance, biomass and seasonal cycle of dominant groups) in the water column. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems” and “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C2, Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C6 and Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C1. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM divisions) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 5 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). The threshold values for the indicator of seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups are still missing for some assessment units of the Baltic Sea (incl. Estonian marine area), mainly due to the lack of data corresponding to the set criteria.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor phytoplankton communities (species composition, abundance, biomass and seasonal cycle of dominant groups) in the water column. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems” and “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C2, Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C6 and Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C1. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM divisions) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 5 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). The threshold values for the indicator of seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups are still missing for some assessment units of the Baltic Sea (incl. Estonian marine area), mainly due to the lack of data corresponding to the set criteria.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor phytoplankton communities (species composition, abundance, biomass and seasonal cycle of dominant groups) in the water column. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems” and “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C2, Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C6 and Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C1. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM divisions) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 5 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). The threshold values for the indicator of seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups are still missing for some assessment units of the Baltic Sea (incl. Estonian marine area), mainly due to the lack of data corresponding to the set criteria.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor species composition, abundance and biomass of mesozooplankton. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, as well as “SD2-Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptors D1, Criterion D1C6, Description D2 Criterions D2C1 and D2C2 and Descriptor D4 Criterion D4C2. Data are gathered to assess the state of the marine environment and environmental status in three coastal water bodies and all off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions) as well as pressures from/by non-indigenous species. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a frequency 10 times a year at the designated coastal monitoring stations (3 stations in each coastal water body) and with frequency twice a year for 16 stations in the Estonian off-shore areas. The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). Mesozooplankton Mean Size Total Stock indicator is developed by HELCOM on the basis of mesozooplankton data. The threshold values for the indicator have been internationally agreed for some sub-basins, but not for the Gulf of Riga yet.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor species composition, abundance and biomass of mesozooplankton. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, as well as “SD2-Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptors D1, Criterion D1C6, Description D2 Criterions D2C1 and D2C2 and Descriptor D4 Criterion D4C2. Data are gathered to assess the state of the marine environment and environmental status in three coastal water bodies and all off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions) as well as pressures from/by non-indigenous species. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a frequency 10 times a year at the designated coastal monitoring stations (3 stations in each coastal water body) and with frequency twice a year for 16 stations in the Estonian off-shore areas. The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). Mesozooplankton Mean Size Total Stock indicator is developed by HELCOM on the basis of mesozooplankton data. The threshold values for the indicator have been internationally agreed for some sub-basins, but not for the Gulf of Riga yet.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor species composition, abundance and biomass of mesozooplankton. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, as well as “SD2-Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptors D1, Criterion D1C6, Description D2 Criterions D2C1 and D2C2 and Descriptor D4 Criterion D4C2. Data are gathered to assess the state of the marine environment and environmental status in three coastal water bodies and all off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions) as well as pressures from/by non-indigenous species. Monitoring is conducted yearly with a frequency 10 times a year at the designated coastal monitoring stations (3 stations in each coastal water body) and with frequency twice a year for 16 stations in the Estonian off-shore areas. The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). Mesozooplankton Mean Size Total Stock indicator is developed by HELCOM on the basis of mesozooplankton data. The threshold values for the indicator have been internationally agreed for some sub-basins, but not for the Gulf of Riga yet.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor macrozoobenthos communities (species composition, abundance and biomass) on the seafloor. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD6/SD1 Sea-floor integrity/Biological diversity – benthic habitats”, “SD2– Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C8, Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3, Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C2 and Descriptor D6, Criterion D6C5. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency once a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine).
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Seabed habitats – community characteristics; Benthic species – abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor macrozoobenthos communities (species composition, abundance and biomass) on the seafloor. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD6/SD1 Sea-floor integrity/Biological diversity – benthic habitats”, “SD2– Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C8, Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3, Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C2 and Descriptor D6, Criterion D6C5. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency once a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine).
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Seabed habitats – community characteristics; Benthic species – abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor macrozoobenthos communities (species composition, abundance and biomass) on the seafloor. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD6/SD1 Sea-floor integrity/Biological diversity – benthic habitats”, “SD2– Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C8, Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3, Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C2 and Descriptor D6, Criterion D6C5. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency once a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine).
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Seabed habitats – community characteristics; Benthic species – abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor macrozoobenthos communities (species composition, abundance and biomass) on the seafloor. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD6/SD1 Sea-floor integrity/Biological diversity – benthic habitats”, “SD2– Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C8, Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3, Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C2 and Descriptor D6, Criterion D6C5. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency once a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine).
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Seabed habitats – community characteristics; Benthic species – abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor macrozoobenthos communities (species composition, abundance and biomass) on the seafloor. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD6/SD1 Sea-floor integrity/Biological diversity – benthic habitats”, “SD2– Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C8, Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3, Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C2 and Descriptor D6, Criterion D6C5. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency once a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine).
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Seabed habitats – community characteristics; Benthic species – abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor macrozoobenthos communities (species composition, abundance and biomass) on the seafloor. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD6/SD1 Sea-floor integrity/Biological diversity – benthic habitats”, “SD2– Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C8, Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3, Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C2 and Descriptor D6, Criterion D6C5. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency once a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine).
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Seabed habitats – community characteristics; Benthic species – abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor macrozoobenthos communities (species composition, abundance and biomass) on the seafloor. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD6/SD1 Sea-floor integrity/Biological diversity – benthic habitats”, “SD2– Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C8, Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3, Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C2 and Descriptor D6, Criterion D6C5. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency once a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine).
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Seabed habitats – community characteristics; Benthic species – abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor macrozoobenthos communities (species composition, abundance and biomass) on the seafloor. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD6/SD1 Sea-floor integrity/Biological diversity – benthic habitats”, “SD2– Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C8, Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3, Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C2 and Descriptor D6, Criterion D6C5. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency once a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine).
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Seabed habitats – community characteristics; Benthic species – abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor macrozoobenthos communities (species composition, abundance and biomass) on the seafloor. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD6/SD1 Sea-floor integrity/Biological diversity – benthic habitats”, “SD2– Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C8, Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3, Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C2 and Descriptor D6, Criterion D6C5. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency once a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine).
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Seabed habitats – community characteristics; Benthic species – abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor chlorophyll-a levels in the water column (including surface layer) to assess phytoplankton biomass and productivity. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C2, and strategy SD4/SD1, Criterion D4C2. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, data are delivered separately by each country. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and HELCOM ICES database (by 1 September). Algorithms for chlorophyll-a concentration estimates based on remote sensing data are under development.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor chlorophyll-a levels in the water column (including surface layer) to assess phytoplankton biomass and productivity. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C2, and strategy SD4/SD1, Criterion D4C2. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, data are delivered separately by each country. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and HELCOM ICES database (by 1 September). Algorithms for chlorophyll-a concentration estimates based on remote sensing data are under development.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency). |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Monitoring details |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Visual counting from land in defined sectors and flight counting in off-shore areas are conducted. The observation sector includes an easily demarcated stretch of coastline with the sea. 116 sectors have been selected for regular monitoring in the coastal area. As a rule, all coastal (<2 km) waterbirds are counted. Age is also fixed for swans. Several other parameters such as weather (wind strength, visibility, ice cover %) are also recorded during the observations.
In order to count the wintering waterbirds in off-shore areas, the flights are conducted every 5 years covering the entire Estonian sea area. The number of birds by species per covered counting section during a certain period of time is fixed from counting transects with a defined width. The monitoring is being conducted in the Estonian marine area up to 50 m depth line. All species are counted during the monitoring and their abundance assessed. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
For monitoring offshore fish species the hydro-acoustic surveys and scientific trawlings are carried out. In addition, ICES coordinated cruises (BIAS, BITS) are carried out and the data are submitted to the ICES database. |
For monitoring offshore fish species the hydro-acoustic surveys and scientific trawlings are carried out. In addition, ICES coordinated cruises (BIAS, BITS) are carried out and the data are submitted to the ICES database. |
For monitoring offshore fish species the hydro-acoustic surveys and scientific trawlings are carried out. In addition, ICES coordinated cruises (BIAS, BITS) are carried out and the data are submitted to the ICES database. |
For monitoring offshore fish species the hydro-acoustic surveys and scientific trawlings are carried out. In addition, ICES coordinated cruises (BIAS, BITS) are carried out and the data are submitted to the ICES database. |
For monitoring offshore fish species the hydro-acoustic surveys and scientific trawlings are carried out. In addition, ICES coordinated cruises (BIAS, BITS) are carried out and the data are submitted to the ICES database. |
For monitoring offshore fish species the hydro-acoustic surveys and scientific trawlings are carried out. In addition, ICES coordinated cruises (BIAS, BITS) are carried out and the data are submitted to the ICES database. |
For monitoring offshore fish species the hydro-acoustic surveys and scientific trawlings are carried out. In addition, ICES coordinated cruises (BIAS, BITS) are carried out and the data are submitted to the ICES database. |
Phytoplankton samples are collected with a bathometer at water depths of 1, 5 and 10 m together with samples of seawater chlorophyll a. An integrated sample is made pooling equal amounts of water collected from fixed depths. When the integrated sample is thoroughly mixed, a portion is poured into a clear glass bottle and fixed with preservation chemical for further transport, storage and analysis of the phytoplankton sample. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner. Phytoplankton is analysed according to the relevant international standard methods (EN 16695: 2015, HELCOM Monitoring Manual).
In 3 coastal water bodies sampling is carried out annually 10-12 times per year (from April to October), Haapsalu coastal waterbody - 10-12 times every third year. Other coastal water bodies are monitored in rotation 6 times per year (from June to September) at least once during a 6-year period. In the off-shore areas the research vessel-based monitoring is conducted 5 times per year (from April to October) and 12 times every year in frames of Ferrybox monitoring. |
Phytoplankton samples are collected with a bathometer at water depths of 1, 5 and 10 m together with samples of seawater chlorophyll a. An integrated sample is made pooling equal amounts of water collected from fixed depths. When the integrated sample is thoroughly mixed, a portion is poured into a clear glass bottle and fixed with preservation chemical for further transport, storage and analysis of the phytoplankton sample. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner. Phytoplankton is analysed according to the relevant international standard methods (EN 16695: 2015, HELCOM Monitoring Manual).
In 3 coastal water bodies sampling is carried out annually 10-12 times per year (from April to October), Haapsalu coastal waterbody - 10-12 times every third year. Other coastal water bodies are monitored in rotation 6 times per year (from June to September) at least once during a 6-year period. In the off-shore areas the research vessel-based monitoring is conducted 5 times per year (from April to October) and 12 times every year in frames of Ferrybox monitoring. |
Phytoplankton samples are collected with a bathometer at water depths of 1, 5 and 10 m together with samples of seawater chlorophyll a. An integrated sample is made pooling equal amounts of water collected from fixed depths. When the integrated sample is thoroughly mixed, a portion is poured into a clear glass bottle and fixed with preservation chemical for further transport, storage and analysis of the phytoplankton sample. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner. Phytoplankton is analysed according to the relevant international standard methods (EN 16695: 2015, HELCOM Monitoring Manual).
In 3 coastal water bodies sampling is carried out annually 10-12 times per year (from April to October), Haapsalu coastal waterbody - 10-12 times every third year. Other coastal water bodies are monitored in rotation 6 times per year (from June to September) at least once during a 6-year period. In the off-shore areas the research vessel-based monitoring is conducted 5 times per year (from April to October) and 12 times every year in frames of Ferrybox monitoring. |
The samples are collected by means of vertical hauls using a Juday or WP-2 net with 0,1 mm mesh size. The collected samples are preserved in a formaldehyde solution to microscopic analysis to be performed in a laboratory. |
The samples are collected by means of vertical hauls using a Juday or WP-2 net with 0,1 mm mesh size. The collected samples are preserved in a formaldehyde solution to microscopic analysis to be performed in a laboratory. |
The samples are collected by means of vertical hauls using a Juday or WP-2 net with 0,1 mm mesh size. The collected samples are preserved in a formaldehyde solution to microscopic analysis to be performed in a laboratory. |
Macrozoobenthos samples are collected once a year in off-shore areas and designated coastal waters and in rotation at least once in a 6-year period from other coastal waters. Van Veen or Ekman type grab samplers are used for sampling. The sediment type, concentration of dissolved oxygen in the near-bottom layer, concentration of H2S, water temperature and salinity are registered as supplementary information at the sampling site. Every sample is collected in triplicate and frozen for laboratory analyse. In the laboratory, the species composition, abundance of species and dry weight of every species (per 1 m2) is determined.
For observation of maximum depth distribution of Limecola balthica, three designated transects are monitored in the open-sea area; samples (one sample per each depth point) are taken in accordance with the transect depth gradient. |
Macrozoobenthos samples are collected once a year in off-shore areas and designated coastal waters and in rotation at least once in a 6-year period from other coastal waters. Van Veen or Ekman type grab samplers are used for sampling. The sediment type, concentration of dissolved oxygen in the near-bottom layer, concentration of H2S, water temperature and salinity are registered as supplementary information at the sampling site. Every sample is collected in triplicate and frozen for laboratory analyse. In the laboratory, the species composition, abundance of species and dry weight of every species (per 1 m2) is determined.
For observation of maximum depth distribution of Limecola balthica, three designated transects are monitored in the open-sea area; samples (one sample per each depth point) are taken in accordance with the transect depth gradient. |
Macrozoobenthos samples are collected once a year in off-shore areas and designated coastal waters and in rotation at least once in a 6-year period from other coastal waters. Van Veen or Ekman type grab samplers are used for sampling. The sediment type, concentration of dissolved oxygen in the near-bottom layer, concentration of H2S, water temperature and salinity are registered as supplementary information at the sampling site. Every sample is collected in triplicate and frozen for laboratory analyse. In the laboratory, the species composition, abundance of species and dry weight of every species (per 1 m2) is determined.
For observation of maximum depth distribution of Limecola balthica, three designated transects are monitored in the open-sea area; samples (one sample per each depth point) are taken in accordance with the transect depth gradient. |
Macrozoobenthos samples are collected once a year in off-shore areas and designated coastal waters and in rotation at least once in a 6-year period from other coastal waters. Van Veen or Ekman type grab samplers are used for sampling. The sediment type, concentration of dissolved oxygen in the near-bottom layer, concentration of H2S, water temperature and salinity are registered as supplementary information at the sampling site. Every sample is collected in triplicate and frozen for laboratory analyse. In the laboratory, the species composition, abundance of species and dry weight of every species (per 1 m2) is determined.
For observation of maximum depth distribution of Limecola balthica, three designated transects are monitored in the open-sea area; samples (one sample per each depth point) are taken in accordance with the transect depth gradient. |
Macrozoobenthos samples are collected once a year in off-shore areas and designated coastal waters and in rotation at least once in a 6-year period from other coastal waters. Van Veen or Ekman type grab samplers are used for sampling. The sediment type, concentration of dissolved oxygen in the near-bottom layer, concentration of H2S, water temperature and salinity are registered as supplementary information at the sampling site. Every sample is collected in triplicate and frozen for laboratory analyse. In the laboratory, the species composition, abundance of species and dry weight of every species (per 1 m2) is determined.
For observation of maximum depth distribution of Limecola balthica, three designated transects are monitored in the open-sea area; samples (one sample per each depth point) are taken in accordance with the transect depth gradient. |
Macrozoobenthos samples are collected once a year in off-shore areas and designated coastal waters and in rotation at least once in a 6-year period from other coastal waters. Van Veen or Ekman type grab samplers are used for sampling. The sediment type, concentration of dissolved oxygen in the near-bottom layer, concentration of H2S, water temperature and salinity are registered as supplementary information at the sampling site. Every sample is collected in triplicate and frozen for laboratory analyse. In the laboratory, the species composition, abundance of species and dry weight of every species (per 1 m2) is determined.
For observation of maximum depth distribution of Limecola balthica, three designated transects are monitored in the open-sea area; samples (one sample per each depth point) are taken in accordance with the transect depth gradient. |
Macrozoobenthos samples are collected once a year in off-shore areas and designated coastal waters and in rotation at least once in a 6-year period from other coastal waters. Van Veen or Ekman type grab samplers are used for sampling. The sediment type, concentration of dissolved oxygen in the near-bottom layer, concentration of H2S, water temperature and salinity are registered as supplementary information at the sampling site. Every sample is collected in triplicate and frozen for laboratory analyse. In the laboratory, the species composition, abundance of species and dry weight of every species (per 1 m2) is determined.
For observation of maximum depth distribution of Limecola balthica, three designated transects are monitored in the open-sea area; samples (one sample per each depth point) are taken in accordance with the transect depth gradient. |
Macrozoobenthos samples are collected once a year in off-shore areas and designated coastal waters and in rotation at least once in a 6-year period from other coastal waters. Van Veen or Ekman type grab samplers are used for sampling. The sediment type, concentration of dissolved oxygen in the near-bottom layer, concentration of H2S, water temperature and salinity are registered as supplementary information at the sampling site. Every sample is collected in triplicate and frozen for laboratory analyse. In the laboratory, the species composition, abundance of species and dry weight of every species (per 1 m2) is determined.
For observation of maximum depth distribution of Limecola balthica, three designated transects are monitored in the open-sea area; samples (one sample per each depth point) are taken in accordance with the transect depth gradient. |
Macrozoobenthos samples are collected once a year in off-shore areas and designated coastal waters and in rotation at least once in a 6-year period from other coastal waters. Van Veen or Ekman type grab samplers are used for sampling. The sediment type, concentration of dissolved oxygen in the near-bottom layer, concentration of H2S, water temperature and salinity are registered as supplementary information at the sampling site. Every sample is collected in triplicate and frozen for laboratory analyse. In the laboratory, the species composition, abundance of species and dry weight of every species (per 1 m2) is determined.
For observation of maximum depth distribution of Limecola balthica, three designated transects are monitored in the open-sea area; samples (one sample per each depth point) are taken in accordance with the transect depth gradient. |
Chlorophyll-a concentration determination samples are collected from certain monitoring stations with a bathometer at depths of 1, 5 and 10 m (if maxima concentration is fixed in the water column, then from this depth also). An integrated sample is made pooling equal amounts of water collected from fixed depths. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples for later laboratory Chl-a analysis are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner and chlorophyll-a fluorescence is analysed. In addition, chlorophyll-a fluorescence measurements are done at buoy-stations and by sonar equipment with fluorometers. Surface layer pigment concentration monitoring is done with a remote method (satellite).
Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). |
Chlorophyll-a concentration determination samples are collected from certain monitoring stations with a bathometer at depths of 1, 5 and 10 m (if maxima concentration is fixed in the water column, then from this depth also). An integrated sample is made pooling equal amounts of water collected from fixed depths. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples for later laboratory Chl-a analysis are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner and chlorophyll-a fluorescence is analysed. In addition, chlorophyll-a fluorescence measurements are done at buoy-stations and by sonar equipment with fluorometers. Surface layer pigment concentration monitoring is done with a remote method (satellite).
Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
Aquaculture – marine, including infrastructure
|
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)
|
Hunting and collecting for other purposes
|
Marine plant harvesting
|
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)
|
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure
|
Extraction of water
|
Military operations (subject to Article 2(2))
|
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables)
|
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure
|
Research, survey and educational activities
|
Coastal defence and flood protection
|
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables)
|
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials
|
Tourism and leisure activities
|
Tourism and leisure infrastructure
|
Transport infrastructure
|
Transport – shipping
|
Waste treatment and disposal
|
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
|
Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
|
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
|
Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
|
Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Input or spread of non-indigenous species
|
Input or spread of non-indigenous species
|
Input or spread of non-indigenous species
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
GES criteria |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D4C4 |
D8C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D3C1 |
D3C1 |
D3C2 |
D3C2 |
D3C3 |
D3C3 |
D3C3 |
D3C3 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D1C1 |
D1C2 |
D1C3 |
D3C1 |
D3C2 |
D3C3 |
D1C6 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D1C6 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D2C1 |
D2C2 |
D2C3 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D4C2 |
D5C8 |
D6C4 |
D6C5 |
D4C2 |
D5C2 |
|||
Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Parameter Other |
Production (tonnes); Area; Nutrient load |
Catch; By-catch |
Number of individuals hunted by species (waterbird |
Amount (kg); Area |
Mining volume; Mining area; Area pressure index |
Pipe length (area); Area pressure index |
Volume |
Number of explosions; Number of trainings; Trainin |
Cable length (area); Area pressure index |
Area; Area pressure index |
Volume of costs on marine researches; Number of re |
Length of defence structure; Coastline pressure in |
Area of structure; Area pressure index |
Soil volume; Extent; Area pressure index |
Number of vacationists; Number of visits; People's |
Number of marinas per coastline; Length of beach |
Area; Volume (goods and passengers); Number of loa |
Number of ships (incl. number of ships complying w |
Areas of dumping sites and volume of dumped materi |
Pollution load (tonnes/year) - Hg, Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn, |
Amount in sediments; Litter type and material |
Pollution load (tonnes/year) - N, P, BHT5 |
Number of disturbance days - Impulsive underwater |
Species composition |
Distribution (pattern); Distribution (range) |
Breeding success |
Productivity; Brood size; Breeding success |
Mass (catch weight per unit effort) |
Abundance index of European eel in monitoring catc |
Mass (catch weight per unit effort) |
Mass (catch weight per unit effort) |
Mass (catch weight per unit effort) |
Mass (catch weight per unit effort) |
Mass (catch weight per unit effort) |
Mass (catch mass per unit effort) |
Mass (catch mass per unit effort) |
Mass (catch mass per unit effort) |
Ratio between annual commercial catch and biomass |
Mass (commercial catch weight per unit effort) |
Age distribution |
Age distribution; Sex distribution |
Mass (commercial catch weight per unit effort) |
Sex distribution; Age distribution |
Species composition; Trophic level class of fish s |
Abundance of coastal fish key functional groups (C |
Age distribution |
Species composition; Abundance (number of individu |
Species composition |
Species composition; Abundance (number of individu |
Species composition |
Abundance (number of individuals); Biomass |
Abundance (number of individuals); Biomass |
Species composition |
Extent |
Extent |
Species composition; Biomass |
Species composition; Abundance; Biomass |
Concentration in water |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1992-9999 |
1992-9999 |
1992-9999 |
1992-9999 |
1992-9999 |
1992-9999 |
1992-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
ICES WGBFAS |
The monitoring and assessment of the state of herring and sprat stocks are following the ICES WGBFAS methodology. Herring and sprat stocks and stock trends are assessed on the basis of the catches. Based on the collected material, biological analyses are performed and the age of the individuals is determined. |
The monitoring and assessment of the state of herring and sprat stocks are following the ICES WGBFAS methodology. Herring and sprat stocks and stock trends are assessed on the basis of the catches. Based on the collected material, biological analyses are performed and the age of the individuals is determined. |
The monitoring and assessment of the state of herring and sprat stocks are following the ICES WGBFAS methodology. Herring and sprat stocks and stock trends are assessed on the basis of the catches. Based on the collected material, biological analyses are performed and the age of the individuals is determined. |
The monitoring and assessment of the state of herring and sprat stocks are following the ICES WGBFAS methodology. Herring and sprat stocks and stock trends are assessed on the basis of the catches. Based on the collected material, biological analyses are performed and the age of the individuals is determined. |
The monitoring and assessment of the state of herring and sprat stocks are following the ICES WGBFAS methodology. Herring and sprat stocks and stock trends are assessed on the basis of the catches. Based on the collected material, biological analyses are performed and the age of the individuals is determined. |
The monitoring and assessment of the state of herring and sprat stocks are following the ICES WGBFAS methodology. Herring and sprat stocks and stock trends are assessed on the basis of the catches. Based on the collected material, biological analyses are performed and the age of the individuals is determined. |
The monitoring and assessment of the state of herring and sprat stocks are following the ICES WGBFAS methodology. Herring and sprat stocks and stock trends are assessed on the basis of the catches. Based on the collected material, biological analyses are performed and the age of the individuals is determined. |
National monitoring programme |
National monitoring programme |
National monitoring programme |
National monitoring programme |
National monitoring programme |
National monitoring programme |
National monitoring programme |
National monitoring programme |
National monitoring programme |
||||||||||||||||||||
Quality control |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, including data quality control when entering data into the e-Biodiversity (PlutoF) database. Internationally coordinated by Wetlands International, HELCOM/ICES JWGBirdGroup. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
ICES WGBFAS
|
ICES WGBFAS
|
ICES WGBFAS
|
ICES WGBFAS
|
ICES WGBFAS
|
ICES WGBFAS
|
ICES WGBFAS
|
The quality is ensured by following the standard methods and HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the standard methods and HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the standard methods and HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the OSPAR/HELCOM guidance (OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) recommendations, accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is ensured by following the OSPAR/HELCOM guidance (OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) recommendations, accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is ensured by following the OSPAR/HELCOM guidance (OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) recommendations, accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is ensured by following the OSPAR/HELCOM guidance (OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) recommendations, accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is ensured by following the OSPAR/HELCOM guidance (OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) recommendations, accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is ensured by following the OSPAR/HELCOM guidance (OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) recommendations, accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is ensured by following the OSPAR/HELCOM guidance (OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) recommendations, accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is ensured by following the OSPAR/HELCOM guidance (OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) recommendations, accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is ensured by following the OSPAR/HELCOM guidance (OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) recommendations, accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is assured by following the HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and by filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is assured by following the HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and by filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
Data management |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Data access |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contact |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency, kaur@envir.ee;
Estonian Ornithological Society, eoy@eoy.ee;
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Leho Luigujõe, leho.luigujoe@emu.ee. |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
References |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |