Member State report / Art8 / 2012 / D1-P / Greece / Mediterranean: Aegean-Levantine Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2012-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Pelagic habitats |
Member State | Greece |
Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Aegean-Levantine Sea |
Reported by | Dept of Marine Sciences, University of the Aegean, 81100 Mytilene, Greece, Faculty of Geology and Geo-Environment, University of Athens, Greece, University of Creete, Biology Department |
Report date | 2012-10-15 |
Report access | MALGR_MSFD8aFeatures_20130430.xml |
It constitutes the assessment area Aegean Sea belonging in the subregion Mediterranean sea:Aegean-Levantine sea
Topic |
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatDistribution
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatDistribution
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatDistribution
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatDistribution
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatDistribution
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatDistribution
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatDistribution
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatDistribution
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatDistribution
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatDistribution
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatOverall
|
HabitatOverall
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reporting Feature |
Shelf sublittoral sand |
Shelf sublittoral sand |
Shelf sublittoral sand |
Shelf sublittoral sand |
Shelf sublittoral mud |
Shelf sublittoral mud |
Shelf sublittoral mud |
Shelf sublittoral mud |
Shelf sublittoral mixed sediment |
Shelf sublittoral mixed sediment |
Shelf sublittoral mixed sediment |
Shelf sublittoral mixed sediment |
Shelf sublittoral coarse sediment |
Shelf sublittoral coarse sediment |
Shelf sublittoral coarse sediment |
Shelf sublittoral coarse sediment |
Shallow sublittoral sand |
Shallow sublittoral sand |
Shallow sublittoral sand |
Shallow sublittoral sand |
Shallow sublittoral mud |
Shallow sublittoral mud |
Shallow sublittoral mud |
Shallow sublittoral mud |
Shallow sublittoral mixed sediment |
Shallow sublittoral mixed sediment |
Shallow sublittoral mixed sediment |
Shallow sublittoral mixed sediment |
Shallow sublittoral coarse sediment |
Shallow sublittoral coarse sediment |
Shallow sublittoral coarse sediment |
Shallow sublittoral coarse sediment |
Shallow sublittoral coarse sediment |
Posidonia oceanica meadows |
Posidonia oceanica meadows |
Posidonia oceanica meadows |
Posidonia oceanica meadows |
Posidonia oceanica meadows |
Posidonia oceanica meadows |
Maerl type sediments |
Maerl type sediments |
Maerl type sediments |
Maerl type sediments |
Maerl type sediments |
Maerl type sediments |
Maerl type sediments |
Maerl type sediments |
Indicator |
6.2.2 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
6.2.2 |
6.2.2 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
6.2.2 |
6.2.2 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
6.2.2 |
6.2.2 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
6.2.2 |
6.2.2 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
6.2.2 |
6.2.2 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
6.2.2 |
6.2.2 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
6.2.2 |
6.2.2 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
6.2.2 |
6.2.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
1.6.1 |
6.1.2 |
1.6.1 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
1.4.1 |
1.5.1 |
1.6.1 |
6.1.2 |
Threshold Value |
According to WFD indicators
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
According to WFD indicators
|
According to WFD indicators
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
According to WFD indicators
|
According to WFD indicators
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
According to WFD indicators
|
According to WFD indicators
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
According to WFD indicators
|
According to WFD indicators
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
According to WFD indicators
|
According to WFD indicators
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
According to WFD indicators
|
According to WFD indicators
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
According to WFD indicators
|
According to WFD indicators
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
According to WFD indicators
|
According to WFD indicators
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Threshold Unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold Proportion |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Descriptive |
Descriptive |
Descriptive |
Descriptive |
Descriptive |
Descriptive |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
Status Description |
Seagrass meadows are considered to be among the most important marine ecosystems, with regard to both ecology and biodiversity and for the services they provide. Recent evidence has indicated a global trajectory of decline for seagrasses with a current loss rate of about 9% yr–1 , although Posidonia oceanica meadows are still the major habitats in eastern Mediterranean Sea. |
Seagrass meadows are considered to be among the most important marine ecosystems, with regard to both ecology and biodiversity and for the services they provide. Recent evidence has indicated a global trajectory of decline for seagrasses with a current loss rate of about 9% yr–1 , although Posidonia oceanica meadows are still the major habitats in eastern Mediterranean Sea. |
Seagrass meadows are considered to be among the most important marine ecosystems, with regard to both ecology and biodiversity and for the services they provide. Recent evidence has indicated a global trajectory of decline for seagrasses with a current loss rate of about 9% yr–1 , although Posidonia oceanica meadows are still the major habitats in eastern Mediterranean Sea. |
Seagrass meadows are considered to be among the most important marine ecosystems, with regard to both ecology and biodiversity and for the services they provide. Recent evidence has indicated a global trajectory of decline for seagrasses with a current loss rate of about 9% yr–1 , although Posidonia oceanica meadows are still the major habitats in eastern Mediterranean Sea. |
Seagrass meadows are considered to be among the most important marine ecosystems, with regard to both ecology and biodiversity and for the services they provide. Recent evidence has indicated a global trajectory of decline for seagrasses with a current loss rate of about 9% yr–1 , although Posidonia oceanica meadows are still the major habitats in eastern Mediterranean Sea. |
Seagrass meadows are considered to be among the most important marine ecosystems, with regard to both ecology and biodiversity and for the services they provide. Recent evidence has indicated a global trajectory of decline for seagrasses with a current loss rate of about 9% yr–1 , although Posidonia oceanica meadows are still the major habitats in eastern Mediterranean Sea. |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Declining |
Declining |
Declining |
Declining |
Declining |
Declining |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Status Confidence |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
Topic |
FuncGroupAbundance
|
FuncGroupCondition
|
FuncGroupOverall
|
FuncGroupAbundance
|
FuncGroupCondition
|
FuncGroupOverall
|
FuncGroupAbundance
|
FuncGroupCondition
|
FuncGroupOverall
|
FuncGroupAbundance
|
FuncGroupCondition
|
FuncGroupOverall
|
FuncGroupAbundance
|
FuncGroupCondition
|
FuncGroupOverall
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting Feature |
Inshore pelagic-feeding birds |
Inshore pelagic-feeding birds |
Inshore pelagic-feeding birds |
Baleen whales |
Baleen whales |
Baleen whales |
Turtles |
Turtles |
Turtles |
Seals |
Seals |
Seals |
Toothed whales |
Toothed whales |
Toothed whales |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indicator |
4.3.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.6.1 |
4.3.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.6.1 |
4.3.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.6.1 |
4.3.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.6.1 |
4.3.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.6.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold Value |
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
Qualitative assessment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold Unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold Proportion |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
Descriptive |
Descriptive |
Descriptive |
Descriptive |
Descriptive |
Descriptive |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status Description |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
No decrease of group abundance related to previous years |
No deterioration of group composition related to previous years |
No deterioration of group composition related to previous years |
No decrease of group abundance related to previous years |
No deterioration of group composition related to previous years |
No deterioration of group composition related to previous years |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status Trend |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status Confidence |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |