Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-R / Spain / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Reptiles |
Member State | Spain |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast |
Reported by | Subdirección General para la protección del mar. D.G. Sostenibilidad de la Costa y del Mar. Minister |
Report date | 2020-02-03 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART8GES_MOD2020.xml |
Demarcación marina noratlántica (ABI-ES-SD-NOR)
GES component |
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Element |
Caretta caretta |
Caretta caretta |
Caretta caretta |
Caretta caretta |
Caretta caretta |
Caretta caretta |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Element code |
137205 |
137205 |
137205 |
137205 |
137205 |
137205 |
137209 |
137209 |
137209 |
137209 |
137209 |
137209 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (range)
|
Extent
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (range)
|
Extent
|
Habitat condition
|
||
Parameter other |
||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.2 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
||||||
Threshold value source other |
Heppill et al. (2002 and 2003
|
Mansfield et al. (2014)
|
Mansfield et al. (2014)
|
Eckert (2006)
|
Eckert (2006)
|
Eckert (2006)
|
||||||
Value achieved upper |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
|||
Value unit other |
Annualised mortality rate
|
TURTELS/KM2
|
PERCENTAGE
|
Annualised mortality rate
|
TURTELS/KM2
|
PERCENTAGE
|
PERCENTAGE
|
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
||
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
||
Description parameter |
||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
Density will be assessed when the final results of the 2018 ACCOBAMS surevy wil be published |
Proportion of oceanographic buoys where the surface temperature of seawater exceeds 20ºC in the months of July, August or September. |
Proportion of oceanographic buoys where the surface temperature of seawater exceeds 20ºC in the months of July, August or September. |
No leadtherback turtles was observed during the 2018 ACCOBAMS surevy |
Upwelelling index as resting by IEO, >Â 300 m3s-1Â km-1
|
Upwelelling index as resting by IEO, >Â 300 m3s-1Â km-1
|
||||||
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
Integration rule description criteria |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demarcación marina sudatlántica (ABI-ES-SD-SUD)
GES component |
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
D1-R
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Turtles
|
Element |
Caretta caretta |
Caretta caretta |
Caretta caretta |
Caretta caretta |
Caretta caretta |
Caretta caretta |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Dermochelys coriacea |
Element code |
137205 |
137205 |
137205 |
137205 |
137205 |
137205 |
137209 |
137209 |
137209 |
137209 |
137209 |
137209 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (range)
|
Extent
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (range)
|
Extent
|
Habitat condition
|
||
Parameter other |
||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.2 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
|||||||||
Threshold value source other |
Heppill et al. (2002 and 2003
|
Cejudo et al. (2006); Eckert (2008)
|
Eckert (2006)
|
|||||||||
Value achieved upper |
100.0 |
|||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
||||||
Value unit other |
Annualised mortality rate
|
TURTELS/KM2
|
MR DEEDS
|
TURTELS/KM2
|
||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
||
Description parameter |
||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
Density will be assessed when the final results of the 2018 ACCOBAMS surevy wil be published |
Hard-shelled turtles observed through the area during the 2018 ACCOBAMS survey |
No leadtherback turtles was observed during the 2018 ACCOBAMS surevy |
No leadtherback turtles was observed during the 2018 ACCOBAMS surevy |
||||||||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
HIE_NWEI
|
Integration rule description criteria |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
HIE_NWEi: If a primary criterion cannot be assessed for a species due to a lack of data then the resultant assessment of that criterion for the species cannot be assigned a status (i.e. it is ‘not assessed’). Where the species is only assessed with the primary abundance criterion, if data are missing for this criterion, the species cannot be assigned a status. It also means that the Member State should take action on monitoring and assessment tools to ensure that at the next update under Article 8 MSFD an assessment can be undertaken.
At least D1C1 and D1C4 (50%) have to be fulfilled for both species to achieve GES. If one species is missing in the area (D1C4), GES cannot be Good. GES cannot be assessed only on the basis of D1C5. |
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
No conclusion on the overall status can be achieved in the absence of data about the mortality rate. |
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|