Member State report / Art10 / 2018 / D6 / Spain / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
Member State | Spain |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast |
Reported by | Subdirección General para la Protección del Mar. D.G. Sostenibilidad de la Costa y del Mar. Minister |
Report date | 2020-02-03 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART10.XML |
Target code |
00 |
00 |
A. N.12 |
A. S.12 |
A.1.1 |
A.1.1 |
A.1.2 |
A.1.2 |
A.1.3 |
A.1.3 |
A.1.8 |
A.1.8 |
A.1.9 |
A.1.9 |
A.2.1 |
A.2.1 |
A.3.5 |
A.3.5 |
A.3.6 |
A.3.6 |
A.N.1 |
A.N.10 |
A.N.2 |
A.N.4 |
A.N.9 |
A.S.1 |
A.S.10 |
A.S.2 |
A.S.4 |
A.S.9 |
B.N.14 |
B.N.15 |
B.S.14 |
B.S.15 |
C.1.3 |
C.1.3 |
C.1.4 |
C.1.4 |
C.1.5 |
C.1.5 |
C.2.1 |
C.2.1 |
C.2.2 |
C.2.2 |
C.2.3 |
C.2.3 |
C.3.1 |
C.3.1 |
C.3.2 |
C.3.2 |
C.3.3 |
C.3.3 |
C.3.4 |
C.3.4 |
C.3.5 |
C.3.5 |
C.N.1 |
C.N.10 |
C.N.11 |
C.N.12 |
C.N.15 |
C.N.16 |
C.N.17 |
C.N.18 |
C.N.2 |
C.N.6 |
C.N.7 |
C.N.8 |
C.S.1 |
C.S.10 |
C.S.11 |
C.S.15 |
C.S.16 |
C.S.17 |
C.S.18 |
C.S.2 |
C.S.6 |
C.S.7 |
C.S.8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target description |
Achieve or maintain values and characteristics defined as GES for all descriptors of GES in North Atlantic region.
|
Achieve or maintain the values and characteristics defined as GES for all descriptors of GES in South Atlantic region
|
Improving knowledge on the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics
* Proportion of the assessment area studied.
* Proportion of coastal habitats studied.
* Proportion of deep habitats studied.
OBJECTIVES 2012: C.3.2, C.3.3, C.3.4.
|
Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics.
* Proportion of the assessment area studied.
* Proportion of coastal habitats studied.
* Proportion of deep habitats studied.
OBJECTIVES 2012: C.3.2, C.3.3, C.3.4.
|
Reduce the intensity and area of influence of significant anthropogenic pressures on benthic habitats, with special attention to biogenic and / or protected habitats that represent biodiversity hotspots and are key to ensuring the services and functions of the marine environment: maërl beds, communities of Laminaria, communities of cold-water corals, communities dominated by Pennatulaceans, aggregations of deep and circalittoral sponges and coral gardens. In particular, avoid bottom-gear fishing on the most sensitive habitats, such as seamounts, coralline and maërl communities and cold-water corals; avoid or reduce the construction of infrastructures that may affect sensitive habitats; avoid / reduce the direct and indirect effects of dredging on vulnerable benthic habitats; and avoid the adverse effects of the exploitation of non-renewable marine resources on biogenic and / or protected habitats. In the second cycle, this objective has been modified to: C.N.1. Reduce the intensity and area of influence of significant anthropogenic pressures on benthic habitats, with special attention to protected and / or natural interest habitats. This modified objective will be reported as new, since the code and indicators have changed.
|
Reduce the intensity and area of influence of significant anthropogenic pressures on benthic habitats, with special attention to biogenic and / or protected habitats that represent biodiversity hotspots and are key to ensuring the services and functions of the marine environment: phanerogam meadows, maërl beds, cold-water coral communities, underwater structures produced by gas escapes, pennatulacean-dominated communities, aggregations of deep and circalittoral sponges and coral gardens. In particular, avoid fishing with bottom gear and gear on the most sensitive habitats, such as underwater structures produced by gas escapes, coralline and maërl communities and cold-water corals; avoid or reduce the construction of infrastructures that may affect sensitive habitats; avoid / reduce the direct and indirect effects of dredging on vulnerable benthic habitats; and avoid the adverse effects of the exploitation of non-renewable marine resources on biogenic and / or protected habitats. In the second cycle, this objective has been modified to: C.S.1. Reduce the intensity and area of influence of significant anthropogenic pressures on benthic habitats, with special attention to protected and / or natural interest habitats. This modified objective will be reported as new, since the code and indicators have changed.
|
To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-indigenous species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation (avoid leakages in aquaculture or aquarium installations, avoid transport and release into the medium of species associated with those cultivated outside their natural range, ballast water control, control of live bait, sediment discharge control, anchoring or cleaning of helmets).
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.N..2. To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-native species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-indigenous species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation (avoid leakages in aquaculture or aquarium installations, avoid transport and release into the medium of species associated with those cultivated outside their natural range, ballast water control, control of live bait, sediment discharge control, anchoring or cleaning of helmets).
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.S.2. To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-native species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.N.9. Manage processes for invasions of alien species in an integrated manner, especially those identified in the initial evaluation of D2 in the DMNOR, including the development of early detection networks and their coordination at national level.
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.S.9. Manage processes for invasions of alien species in an integrated manner, especially those identified in the initial evaluation of D2 in DMSUD, including the development of early detection networks and their coordination at national level.
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Develop habitat restoration initiatives and habitat restoration initiatives where their deterioration would compromise the achievement of good environmental status of biodiversity descriptors.
This objective has become part of the new objective of the second cycle:
A.N.1. Ensuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measures.
that it will be reported as a new one
|
Develop habitat restoration initiatives and habitat restoration initiatives where their deterioration would compromise the achievement of good environmental status of biodiversity descriptors.
This objective has become part of the new objective of the second cycle:
A.S.1. Ensuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measures
that it will be reported as a new one
|
Ensuring proper surveillance of the marine environment through remote or on-site systems
In the second cycle, this target has been amended to:
A.N.10. Ensuring regulatory compliance
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensuring proper surveillance of the marine environment through remote or on-site systems
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.S.10. Ensuring regulatory compliance
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Promote the Network of Marine Protected Areas in Spain in the North-Atlantic basin, adequately protecting the biogenic habitats, protected habitats and other habitats identified in the initial assessment as being of particular interest, including a sufficient proportion of them and applying specific management measures.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.N.2. Achieve a complete, ecologically representative, coherent and well managed network of marine protected areas in the North Atlantic area
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Promote the Network of Marine Protected Areas in Spain in the South Atlantic Basin, adequately protecting the biogenic habitats, protected habitats and other habitats identified in the initial assessment as being of particular interest, including a sufficient proportion of them and applying specific management measures.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.S.2.Achieve a complete, ecologically representative, coherent and well managed network of marine protected areas in the South Atlantic area.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in the area of distribution of biogenic habitats and/or protected habitats and unique habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.N.4. To maintain positive or stable trends in the area of distribution of protected habitats or of natural interest and specific habitats.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in the area of distribution of biogenic habitats and/or protected habitats and unique habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.S.4. To maintain positive or stable trends in the range of habitats protected or of natural interest and specific habitats.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Maintain the parameters and trends of state or condition descriptors of benthic communities (and their different facies and associations) within values to ensure their durability and performance, as well as the maintenance of their characteristic species, key and unique species.
|
Maintain the parameters and trends of state or condition descriptors of benthic communities (and their different facies and associations) within values to ensure their durability and performance, as well as the maintenance of their characteristic species, key and unique species.
|
Ensure the conservation and recovery of marine biodiversity through effective instruments and measures. - Percentage of marine species/habitats not in GES, or threatened, that are subject to conservation, recovery and restoration plans and/or national strategies.
* Percentage of the demarcation included in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), including the RN2000.
* Percentage of the area of habitats of community interest included in RN2000.
* Percentage of MPAs with approved management plans and in application.
Objectives 2012: A.1.8, A2.2
|
Ensuring regulatory compliance
* Estimation of surveillance in hours
* Infringements identified vs sanctions imposed
* Human resources available for monitoring and equipment available.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.9
|
Achieve a complete, ecologically representative, coherent and well managed network of marine protected areas in the North Atlantic area.
* Approval of the Master Plan for RAMPE.
* Percentage of MPAs included in the Spanish network of Marine Protected Areas.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.2.1
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in the area of distribution of protected habitats or of natural interest and specific habitats.
* Trends in habitat distribution area.
Objective 2012: A3.5
|
Manage processes for invasions of alien species in an integrated manner, especially those identified in the initial evaluation of D2 in the DMNOR, including the development of early detection networks and their coordination at national level.
The area covered by networks of detection and quantification of non-native species.
* Existence of action protocols for IAC screening events.
* Number of marine species categorised on the list of invasive alien species
* Percentage/number of invasive species subject to management measures or actions.
* Percentage/number of habitats affected by invasive species which have been subject to management measures or actions
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.3, C.3.6
|
Ensuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measures
* Percentage of marine species/habitats not found or threatened, subject to conservation, restoration and restoration plans or national strategies.
* Percentage of the demarcation included in Marine Protected Areas (MPA), including RN2000.
* Percentage of the area of habitats of Community interest included in RN2000.
* Percentage of MPA with approved management plans and implementation.
Objectives 2012: A.1.8, A2.2
|
Ensuring regulatory compliance
* Estimation of surveillance in hours
* Infringements identified vs sanctions imposed
* Human resources available for monitoring and equipment available.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.9
|
Achieve a comprehensive, ecologically representative, coherent and well managed network of marine protected areas in the South Atlantic area.
* Approval of the Master Plan for RAMPE.
* Percentage of MPAs included in the Spanish network of Marine Protected Areas.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.2.1
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in the range of habitats protected or of natural interest and specific habitats.
* Trends in habitat distribution area.
Objective 2012: A3.5
|
Manage processes for invasions of alien species in an integrated manner, especially those identified in the initial evaluation of D2 in DMSUD, including the development of early detection networks and their coordination at national level.
The area covered by networks of detection and quantification of non-native species.
⢠Existence of action protocols for IAC screening events.
⢠Number of marine species categorised on the list of invasive alien species
⢠Percentage/number of invasive species subject to management measures or actions
⢠Number of habitats affected by invasive species which have been subject to management measures or actions.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.3
C.3.6
|
Encourage scientific studies, initiatives and projects on the impacts of the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment to address the knowledge gaps identified in the Initial Assessment and in the successive phases of Marine Strategies.
* Awareness building on impacts arising from the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment, which are addressed by scientific studies and projects.
OBJECTIVES 2012: B.3.1, B.3.2, B.3.3, B.3.4.
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through studies, initiatives and scientific projects on the impacts of the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment.
* Criteria for evaluating and monitoring the results of scientific projects/studies.
* Objectives and management measures for which the design has taken into account the results of scientific projects/studies.
|
Encourage scientific studies, initiatives and projects on the impacts of the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment to address the knowledge gaps identified in the Initial Assessment and in the successive phases of Marine Strategies.
* Awareness building on impacts arising from the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment, which are addressed by scientific studies and projects.
OBJECTIVES 2012: B.3.1, B.3.2, B.3.3, B.3.4.
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through studies, initiatives and scientific projects on the impacts of the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment.
* Criteria for evaluating and monitoring the results of scientific projects/studies.
* Objectives and management measures for which the design has taken into account the results of scientific projects/studies.
|
Ensure public participation in the marine strategy of the North Atlantic demarcation through outreach, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and stakeholder involvement in the marine environment.
In the second cycle, this objective has remained the same, with the exception of the code:
C.N..6. Ensure public participation in the marine strategy of the North Atlantic demarcation through outreach, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and stakeholder involvement in the marine environment.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensure social participation in the Marine Strategy of the South Atlantic Basin through outreach, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and stakeholder involvement in the marine environment.
In the second cycle, this objective has remained the same, with the exception of the code:
C.S.6. Ensure social participation in the Marine Strategy of the South Asian Basin through outreach, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and stakeholder involvement in the marine environment.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Achieve proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the South Atlantic basin that carry out work related to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and exploit synergies.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.S.7. Achieve proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the South Atlantic basin that carry out work related to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and exploit synergies.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.N..8. Promote, through the Marine Spatial Plan of the North Atlantic Demarcation and/or other development tools, that human activities be developed in a sustainable manner and do not jeopardise the achievement of the Good Environmental Status.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Develop management plans for marine recreational activities, or the use thereof, such as marine anchoring, diving, recreational fishing, shipping sports, cetacean watching, etc., for each area in the South Atlantic area where these activities are relevant.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.S.8. To ensure, through the Maritime Spatial Plan of the South Atlantic demarcation and/or other development tools, that human activities are developed in a sustainable manner and do not jeopardise the achievement of the Good Environmental Status.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensure that the area affected by permanent physical alterations caused by human activities is a small proportion of the total area of the North Atlantic demarcation.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.N.10.Promote human actions not significantly increase the surface area affected by physical loss of natural seabed resources compared to the previous cycle in Norlántica.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensure that the area affected by permanent physical alterations caused by human activities is a small proportion of the total area of the South Atlantic area.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.S.10. Foster human actions not to significantly increase the surface affected by physical loss of natural seabed compared to the previous cycle in the South Atlantic area.
This target will be reported as a new target, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To ensure that biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of biogenic habitats and/or protected habitats and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of GES for these habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.N..11. To promote that the biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of protected habitats or natural interests and do not threaten the achievement or maintenance of GES for these habitats.
This target will be considered a new target, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To ensure that biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of biogenic habitats and/or protected habitats and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of GES for these habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.S.11. To promote that the biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of protected habitats or natural interests and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of GES for these habitats.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Take mitigation measures in coastal stretches where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so that hydrodynamics and hydrodynamics properties are compatible with the conservation of habitats
In the second cycle, the wording and the code have been slightly changed.
C.N..12. Take measures on coastal stretches where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so as to be compatible with the good environmental status of the seabed and hydrographical conditions.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, as the code and indicator has changed.
|
Take mitigation measures in coastal stretches where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so that hydrodynamics and hydrodynamics properties are compatible with the conservation of habitats
In the second cycle, the wording and the code have been slightly changed.
C.S.12. Take measures on coastal stretches where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so as to be compatible with the good environmental status of the seabed and hydrographical conditions.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, as the code and indicator has changed.
|
Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.N..15. To improve access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as to ensure the quality of this information, both for maritime administrations and institutions and for the general public.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.S.15. To improve access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as to ensure the quality of this information, both for maritime administrations and institutions and for the general public.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.N.12. Improving knowledge on the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.S.12. Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics. .
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Improve and complement the existing knowledge on the extent, distribution, structure and condition of coastal habitats (up to 50m) and their long-term trends, with a particular focus on the coastal and circalittoral communities of rock and the types of coastal water soft bottoms communities.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.N.12. Improving knowledge on the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Improve and complement the existing knowledge on the extent, distribution, structure and condition of coastal habitats (up to 50m) and their long-term trends, with a particular focus on the coastal and circalittoral communities of rock and the types of coastal water soft bottoms communities.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.S.12. Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics. .
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Increase knowledge about the extent, distribution, structure and status of deep habitats and their long-term trends, with special attention to biogenic habitats and protected habitats, rocky bottoms, circalittoral detrital bottoms, underwater seamounts and canyons and bottoms below 1,000 meters.
In the second cycle this objective has been modified to:
AN12. Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics.
This objective will be reported as new, since the code and indicators have changed.
|
Increase knowledge about the extent, distribution, structure and status of deep habitats and their long-term trends, with special attention to biogenic habitats and protected habitats, rocky bottoms, circalittoral detrital bottoms, underwater structures produced by leaking gases and bottoms below 1,000 meters.
In the second cycle this objective has been modified to:
AS12. Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics.
This target will be reported as new as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Increase awareness of the impact of human activities on habitats, especially biogenic and protected species, their species, populations and communities, their sensitivity, tolerance limits and acclimatisation and acclimatisation, especially in relation to fishing activities, infrastructure construction, dredging, extraction of non-renewable marine resources, pollution and interaction with the effects of climate change (acidification, heating, etc.).
In the second cycle, this objective has been split into two:
C.N..17. Improving knowledge on the effects of climate change on marine and coastal ecosystems, with a view to mainstreaming climate change variable into all phases of Marine Strategies
C.N..17. Improving knowledge on the effects of climate change on marine and coastal ecosystems, with a view to mainstreaming climate change variable into all phases of Marine Strategies
Both will be reported as new
|
Increase awareness of the impact of human activities on habitats, especially biogenic and protected species, their species, populations and communities, their sensitivity, tolerance limits and acclimatisation and acclimatisation, especially in relation to fishing activities, infrastructure construction, dredging, extraction of non-renewable marine resources, pollution and interaction with the effects of climate change (acidification, heating, etc.).
In the second cycle, this objective has been split into two:
C.S.16. Encourage scientific studies and projects to address knowledge gaps identified in the initial assessment of the impact of human activities on marine and coastal ecosystems.
C.S.17. Improving knowledge on the effects of climate change on marine and coastal ecosystems, with a view to mainstreaming climate change variable into all phases of Marine Strategies
Both will be reported as new
|
Reduce the intensity and area of influence of the significant anthropogenic pressures on benthic habitats, with particular attention to protected or natural interest habitats.
* Number of initiatives launched to reduce the impact of pressures on protected or natural interest habitats, with a focus on fishing with bottom gears and rigging on protected or natural interest habitats, infrastructure construction, exploitation of non-renewable marine resources, dredging, recreational activities and other significant pressures on the DMOR.
* Percentage/number of actions and projects with compatibility report
* Area of habitats protected or of natural interest potentially affected by human activities and their trends
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.1
|
Promote that human actions do not significantly increase the area affected by physical loss of natural seabed with respect to the previous cycle in the North Atlantic demarcation.
- Area affected by permanent physical alterations caused by human activities
- Area of the demarcation occupied by coastal defence works
- Area of the demarcation occupied by works or installations whose objective is not the defence of the coast
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.2.1.
|
Promote that localised and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the durability and functioning of protected habitats and/or habitats of natural interest, nor compromise the achievement or maintenance of GES for these habitats
* Percentage of compatibility reports on existing installations
* Area of protected habitats and/or habitats of natural interest affected by permanent physical alterations
|
Take measures on coastal stretches where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so as to be compatible with the good environmental status of the seabed and hydrographical conditions.
* No. of measures taken in respect of each activity causing significant impact.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.2.3
|
To improve access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as to ensure the quality of this information, both for maritime administrations and institutions and for the general public.
⢠Existence of platforms for access and exchange of information on the marine environment which facilitate the management of public administrations
⢠Means of access and quality of marine environment information available to citizens
⢠Number of metadata available
OBJECTIVE C.3.1
|
Encourage scientific studies and projects to address knowledge gaps identified in the initial assessment of the impact of human activities on marine and coastal ecosystems.
* No. of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with these subjects.
* Knowledge-based studies and scientific projects.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.5
|
Improving knowledge on the effects of climate change on marine and coastal ecosystems, with a view to mainstreaming climate change variable into all phases of Marine Strategies
* Number of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with this issue
* Number of monitoring indicators addressing climate change aspects
* Percentage of climate change strategies in Marine Strategies
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.5
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through scientific studies, initiatives and projects on the impact of human activities on habitats, species, populations and communities
* Criteria for evaluation and monitoring of the results of scientific projects/studies (based on the references in documents)
* Objectives and management measures for which the design has taken into account the results of scientific projects/studies
|
To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-native species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation
* Number of policy/control measures on pathways and vectors for introduction and translocation,
* Number of introduction and translocation routes and translocation addressed by policy or regulated measures, such as: Leakages in aquaculture installations, ballast water, anchoring, 'biofouling', live bait, and all types of discharges
* Number of events of introduction of invasive non-indigenous species by vector/track
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.2
|
Ensure social participation in the marine strategy of the North Atlantic demarcation through outreach, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and stakeholder involvement in the marine environment.
* Number of initiatives for social participation and evaluation of their results
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.3
|
Achieve adequate coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the North Atlantic region that carry out work related to the marine environment, so as to avoid duplication and take advantage of synergies
* Number of initiatives, projects and coordination meetings
* Number of themes in which coordination initiatives are adopted
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.4.
|
Promote, through the Marine Spatial Plan of the North Atlantic Demarcation and/or other development tools, that human activities are developed in a sustainable manner and do not jeopardise the achievement of the Good Environmental Status
* Number of human activities covered by the management plan
OBJECTIVE 2012: C1.5
|
Reduce the intensity and area of influence of the significant anthropogenic pressures on benthic habitats, with particular attention to protected or natural interest habitats.
* Number of initiatives launched to reduce the impact of pressures on protected or natural interest habitats, with a focus on fishing with bottom gears and rigging on protected or natural interest habitats, infrastructure construction, exploitation of non-renewable marine resources, dredging, recreational activities and other significant pressures on the DMSUD
* Percentage/number of actions and projects with compatibility report
* Area of habitats protected or of natural interest potentially affected by human activities and their trends
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.1
|
Promote that human actions do not significantly increase the surface area affected by physical loss of natural marine resources compared to the previous cycle in the South Atlantic area.
* Surface affected by permanent physical alterations caused by human activities
* Area in the area occupied by coastal defence works
* Area covered by the area occupied by works or by installations having as their object other than the defence of the coast
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.2.1
|
To promote that the biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of protected habitats or natural interests and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of the GES for these habitats.
* Percentage of compatibility reports on existing installations.
* Area of protected habitats of natural interest affected by permanent physical alterations.
|
To improve access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as to ensure the quality of this information, both for maritime administrations and institutions and for the general public.
⢠Existence of platforms for access and exchange of information on the marine environment which facilitate the management of public administrations
⢠Means of access and quality of marine environment information available to citizens
⢠Number of metadata available
OBJECTIVE C.3.1
|
Encourage scientific studies and projects to address knowledge gaps identified in the initial assessment of the impact of human activities on marine and coastal ecosystems.
* Number of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with these subjects.
* Knowledge-based studies and scientific projects.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.5
|
Improving knowledge on the effects of climate change on marine and coastal ecosystems, with a view to mainstreaming climate change variable into all phases of Marine Strategies
* Number of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with this issue
* Number of monitoring indicators addressing climate change aspects
* Percentage of climate change strategies in Marine Strategies
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.5
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through scientific studies, initiatives and projects on the impact of human activities on habitats, species, populations and communities
* Criteria for evaluation and monitoring of the results of scientific projects/studies (based on the references in documents)
* Objectives and management measures for which the design has taken into account the results of scientific projects/studies
|
To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-native species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation
* Number of policy/control measures on pathways and vectors for introduction and translocation.
* Number of introduction and translocation routes and translocation addressed by policy or regulated measures, such as: Leakages in aquaculture facilities, ballast water, anchoring, 'biofouling', live bait, and all types of discharges.
* Number of events of introduction of invasive non-indigenous species by vector/track
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.2
|
Ensure social participation in the Marine Strategy of the South Atlantic Basin through outreach, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and stakeholder involvement in the marine environment.
* Number of initiatives for social participation and evaluation of their results
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.3
|
Ensure proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the South Atlantic demarcation district which carry out work related to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and exploit synergies
|
To ensure, through the Maritime Spatial Plan of the South Atlantic Marine area and/or other development tools, that human activities are developed in a sustainable manner and do not jeopardise the achievement of the Good Environmental Status.
* Number of human activities covered by the management plan
OBJECTIVE 2012: C1.5
|
Feature(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timescale |
202012 |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
Update date |
201211 |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
Update type |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
New target |
New target |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
Marine reporting unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
superficie del fondo marino |
superficie del fondo marino |
Especies alóctonas invasoras |
Especies alóctonas invasoras |
Habitats |
Habitats |
Porcentaje de la Demarcación estudiada |
Porcentaje de la Demarcación estudiada |
Proporción de hábitats costeros estudiados |
Proporción de hábitats costeros estudiados |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 |
Species |
Especies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Other
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter - other |
All parameters
|
All parameters
|
measures on vectors for introduction
|
measures on vectors for introduction
|
Number of species to be tested
|
Number of species to be tested
|
Existence of surveillance systems
|
Existence of surveillance systems
|
Social participation initiatives
|
Social participation initiatives
|
Coordination actions
|
Coordination actions
|
Existence of management plans
|
Existence of management plans
|
Heath condition
|
Heath condition
|
Degree of access
|
Degree of access
|
proportion of deep habitats studied
|
proportion of deep habitats studied
|
Number of studies
|
Number of studies
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - upper |
283.0 |
76.0 |
5.6 |
17.07 |
2.43 |
1.86 |
7.32 |
28.09 |
51.11 |
58.34 |
22.11 |
14.36 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
square kilometre
|
square kilometre
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
square kilometre
|
square kilometre
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit - other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target status |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2010 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2108 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2108 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2108 |
2012-2018 |
2102-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target assessment description |
(SEE 9 GES reporting for the different arbitrators).
objective 0 is considered unnecessary since it coincides with the main aim of the Directive: Achieve GES in all descriptors
|
(SEE 9 GES reporting for the different arbitrators)
objective 0 is considered unnecessary since it coincides with the main aim of the Directive: Achieve BEA in all descriptors
|
The minimum surface area of the sea floor of the NOR DM nor any type of disturbance during the present evaluation period is 283 million m², which represents 0.09 % of the area covered by the demarcation.
However, the fact that trawl fishing could not be taken into account, an activity highly relevant to this analysis, is considered to be impossible to determine whether or not the target is met.
It is proposed that the aim be maintained, simplifying the wording and focusing more on indicators towards the main pressures from the Norwegian Marina Institute.
The indicator is too general to assess the target and it is therefore proposed to amend it and to combine it with other indicators to assess the initiatives launched to achieve pressure reduction.
It is also proposed to include this objective in group C as it is clearly intended to make human activities compatible with the conservation of the marine environment.
|
The minimum surface area of the DMSUD seabed that has undergone some form of disturbance during the present evaluation period is 76 million m², which represents 0.54 % of the area of the river basin district.
Since trawl fisheries could not be taken into account, a very relevant activity for this analysis, it is considered that it is not possible to determine whether or not the target is met.
It is proposed to maintain the objective, simplifying its wording and focusing more on indicators towards the main pressures from the South American river basin district.
The indicator is too general to assess the target and it is therefore proposed to amend it and to combine it with other indicators to assess the initiatives launched to achieve pressure reduction.
It is also proposed to include this objective in group C as it is clearly intended to make human activities compatible with the conservation of the marine environment.
|
Progress was noted. It is desirable to continue this line.
Actions:
- IMO Waters Convention (in force since 2017)
- Implementation of the EU Regulation on Invasive Species
- Dredging guidelines
It is proposed to maintain the objective, without listing the possible pathways in the target, to shorten it and not to limit the possibilities.
An indicator should be added to provide information on the number or percentage of anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation dealt with by policy or regulated measures. This indicator should indicate the pathways for introduction and translocation of non-indigenous species in particular those identified in the initial assessment of D2.
It is also proposed to include this objective in group C since it is designed to make human activities compatible with the conservation of the marine environment.
|
Progress was noted. It is desirable to continue this line.
Actions:
- IMO Waters Convention (in force since 2017)
- Implementation of the EU Regulation on Invasive Species
- Dredging guidelines
It is proposed to maintain the objective, without listing the possible pathways in the target, to shorten it and not to limit the possibilities.
An indicator should be added to provide information on the number or percentage of anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation dealt with by policy or regulated measures. This indicator should indicate the pathways for introduction and translocation of non-indigenous species in particular those identified in the initial assessment of D2.
It is also proposed to include this objective in group C since it is designed to make human activities compatible with the conservation of the marine environment.
|
Progress was noted. It is desirable to continue this line. Examples of actions:
- Measures taken to withdraw Sargassum in the case of the Atlantic Islands
It is proposed to change the target, as the eradication of IS is very complex and indeed in many cases cannot be addressed. It is proposed to be transformed into an integrated management objective, covering prevention (early detection networks) and management measures, thus covering this objective and C.3.6.
It is proposed to amend the indicator to reflect the percentage of invasive species that have been committed.
|
According to the Initial Assessment of D2 of DMSUD, non-native species have not increased and do not pose a threat to marine habitats.
It is proposed to change the target, as the eradication of IS is very complex and indeed in many cases cannot be addressed. It is proposed to be transformed into an integrated management objective, covering prevention (early detection networks) and management measures, thus covering this objective and C.3.6.
It is proposed to amend the indicator to reflect the percentage of invasive species that have been committed.
|
This objective is considered as a measure targeted at the general objective of âEnsuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measuresâ.
To be included as an indicator, within the above mentioned objective, as follows:
⢠Percentage of marine species/habitats not found or threatened, subject to conservation, restoration and restoration plans or national strategies.
|
This objective is considered as a measure targeted at the general objective of âEnsuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measuresâ.
To be included as an indicator, within the above mentioned objective, as follows:
⢠Percentage of marine species/habitats not found in BEA or threatened, which are subject to conservation, restoration and restoration plans or national strategies.
|
Progress was noted. Active surveillance systems exist on the ground, although monitoring of protected areas of protected areas (EMP) is to be completed.
There are also remote surveillance systems such as buoys, satellites, radio-positioning of vessels by radio (AIS) and satellite (VMS), etc.
It is proposed to change the target in order to focus more on monitoring compliance with the established rules, with a view to protecting marine ecosystems.
Modify indicators to provide information on the degree of surveillance carried out, such as the number of infringement files, surveillance hours or the human resources allocated for this purpose
|
Progress was noted. Active surveillance systems exist on the ground, although monitoring of protected areas of protected areas (EMP) is to be completed.
There are also remote surveillance systems such as buoys, satellites, radio-positioning of vessels by radio (AIS) and satellite (VMS), etc.
It is proposed to change the target in order to focus more on monitoring compliance with the established rules, with a view to protecting marine ecosystems.
Modify indicators to provide information on the degree of surveillance carried out, such as the number of infringement files, surveillance hours or human resources
|
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue along this line
% DM NOR included in Rampe: 5.6Â %
% biogenic/protected/special interest in Rampe: There is no information to reply to this indicator.
The inclusion or not of an MLE in Rampe is not an indicator of protection in itself (this protection is achieved through the RMS statement and the approval of the corresponding management plan)
It is proposed to replace this objective with the objective of âAchieving a complete, ecologically representative, coherent and well managed network of marine protected areasâ. The indicator will also be amended to steer it towards meeting the objectives of Rampe
|
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue along this line
D% SUD included in Rampe: 17.07Â %
% biogenic/protected/special interest in Rampe: There is no information to reply to this indicator.
Evaluation proposal:
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue along this line
The inclusion or not of an MLE in Rampe is not an indicator of protection in itself (this protection is achieved through the RMS statement and the approval of the corresponding management plan)
It is proposed to replace this objective with the objective of âAchieving a complete, ecologically representative, coherent and well managed network of marine protected areasâ. The indicator will also be amended to steer it towards meeting the objectives of Rampe
|
Cannot be evaluated due to lack of data
It is proposed to maintain, since it does not fully coincide with any criterion, but it favours the achievement of the BEA.
|
Cannot be evaluated due to lack of data
It is proposed to maintain, since it does not fully coincide with any criterion, but it favours the achievement of the BEA.
|
It is proposed to remove, since it directly refers to maintaining the descriptors of status in terms of values corresponding to the BEA, it is therefore in line with the criteria of the two descriptors.
|
It is proposed to remove, as it directly refers to maintaining the descriptors of status in terms of values corresponding to the BEA, and is therefore in line with the criteria of the two descriptors.
|
Objective achieved:
- Expert Workshops for PoS design: 14 (Workshops and meetings with administrations and survey)
- Expert meetings/workshops on the MIP design: 21
- Dissemination: 1 Workshop (for Marine Demarcation)
- 1 Dissemination campaign (dissemination materials)
- 2 CONAMAS
- Education and participation projects: 16 (including ABIO and INTEMARES projects)
- meetings with sectors: 1 workshop on socio-economic analysis
- volunteering campaigns
- public consultation of documents from the Member States: 3 It is proposed to keep this objective for the second cycle, so as to ensure social participation in the Member States.
|
Objective achieved:
- Expert PdS workshops: 14 (Workshops and meetings with administrations and survey)
- Expert workshop for the design of the MIP: 21
- Dissemination: 1 workshop (by Marine District, 1 Dissemination campaign (dissemination materials)
- 2 CONAMAS
- projects for education and participation: 8 (BIO) including INTEMARES
- volunteering campaigns:
- meetings with sectors: 1 workshop on socio-economic analysis
- public consultation of documents from the Member States: 3 It is proposed to keep this objective for the second cycle, so as to ensure social participation in the Member States.
|
Target achieved
- ICES meetings: 6
- meetings of the NORM Monitoring Committee meetings: 6
- Autonomous Community meetings on marine biodiversity: 7
- Setting up the DMOR data flow
- Working groups:
WG Biodiversity: 1
Marine cartography: 10
Descriptor 9 GT: 1
WG Seat-Data: 2
Technical WG Linea de Costa: 6
- Meetings with sectors: 1 workshop on socio-economic analysis
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by improving the wording for the second cycle, to make further progress in the coordination of public administrations.
It is proposed to add as indicator:
"Number of thematic areas in which coordination initiatives are taken, compared to the previous cycle"
|
Objective achieved - ICES meetings: 6 - SUD monitoring committee meetings: 6 - Autonomous Community meetings on marine biodiversity: 2 - Establishment of DMSUD (Marine District South Atlantic) data flow - Working groups: WG Biodiversity : 1 WG Marine Cartography :10 WG Descriptor 9: 1 WG Marine Data : 2 WG Shoreline Technical : 6 - Meetings with sectors: 1 workshop on socio-economic analysis It is proposed to maintain the objective, improving the wording for the second cycle, to make more progress in the coordination of public administrations It is proposed to add as an indicator: "number of topics where coordination initiatives are taken, compared to the previous cycle
|
Progress is being made, although not all recreational marine activities are regulated
⢠Managing plans: 1 (Cachucho)
⢠Managing Plans EMP
⢠State legislation on the protection of cetaceans and recreational fisheries
⢠Galicia: Rules on fishing and marinas
⢠Asturias: Legislation in recreational fishing, tourism and leisure activities, sightings of cetaceans, and regulation of activities in protected areas
It is proposed to change the target and indicator to cover all activities and uses, in line with the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive.
|
Progress is being made, although not all recreational marine activities are regulated
⢠EMP Management Plans
⢠State legislation on the protection of cetaceans and recreational fisheries
It is proposed to change the target and indicator to cover all activities and uses, in line with the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive.
|
The objective is considered to have been achieved
Indicator value for the period 2011-2016: 2 434 800 m². 0.0008 % of the surface area of the North Atlantic Demarcation has been affected by permanent physical alterations in the period under review (2011-2016)
See pressure evaluation âphysical lossesâ on the DMOR
It is proposed to amend as it is very similar to criterion D6C1. It could be transformed into a pressure target so as to ensure that new activities of human activities do not significantly increase the surface area affected by physical loss of natural marine resources compared to the previous cycle.
The indicators may also distinguish the area occupied by coastal defence infrastructure from which they do not have this objective.
|
The objective is considered to have been achieved
Indicator value for the period 2011-2016: 1 857 543 m². 0.013 % of the area of South Western Demarctica has been affected by permanent physical alterations in the period under review (2011-2016)
See pressure assessment âphysical lossesâ on DMSUD
It is proposed to amend as it is very similar to criterion D6C1. It could be transformed into a pressure target so as to ensure that new activities of human activities do not significantly increase the surface area affected by physical loss of natural marine resources compared to the previous cycle.
The indicators may also distinguish the area occupied by coastal defence infrastructure from which it does not have this objective.
|
It is not possible to assess accurately
It is proposed to maintain the objective, improving the wording.
It is proposed to modify the indicator in a way that is quantifiable, and to add another concerning the proportion of compatibility reports on existing installations.
|
It is not possible to assess accurately
It is proposed to maintain the objective, improving the wording.
It is proposed to modify the indicator in a way that is quantifiable, and to add another concerning the proportion of compatibility reports on existing installations.
|
Cannot be evaluated
|
Very generic indicator
It is proposed to change the wording of the target in order to make it more specific and linked to the BEA, and that of the indicator, as it is very generic and does not correspond strictly to the objective. The indicator could be in line with the number of mitigation measures taken for each human action that causes physical alterations.
|
Target achieved
All Member State documents are publicly available on MITECO's website.
However, it can be improved.
For the second cycle, it is proposed to specify and extend the target audience, so as to improve access to information on the marine environment available to all maritime administrations and institutions, as well as to the general public.
|
Target achieved
All Member State documents are publicly available on MITECO's website
However, it can be improved.
For the second cycle, it is proposed to specify and extend the target audience, so as to improve access to information on the marine environment available to all maritime administrations and institutions, as well as to the general public.
|
Progress detected
Value of the indicator area on the area covered by the area covered: 7.32Â %
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by merging C.3.2, C.3.3. and C.3.4. and going into type A, simplifying the wording.
|
Progress detected
Value of the indicator area on the area covered by the area covered: 58.34Â %
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by merging C.3.2, C.3.3. and C.3.4. and going into type A, simplifying the wording.
|
Progress was noted.
Value of the Indicator âProportion of coastal habitats studiedâ: 51.11Â %
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by merging C.3.2, C.3.3. and C.3.4. and going into type A, simplifying the wording.
|
Progress detected
Value of the Indicator âProportion of coastal habitats studiedâ: 58.34Â %
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by merging C.3.2, C.3.3. and C.3.4. and going into type A, simplifying the wording.
|
Progress detected
Value of the indicator indicator âproportion of deep habitats studiedâ: 22.11Â %
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by merging C.3.2, C.3.3. and C.3.4. and passing them to type A, further simplifying the wording.
|
Progress detected
Indicator Value: 14.36Â %
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by merging C.3.2, C.3.3. and C.3.4. and passing them to type A, further simplifying the wording.
|
Progress detected
In order to simplify, it is proposed to join all the objectives for the increase of knowledge in the following unit objective: âstudies and scientific projects address the knowledge gaps identified in the IAâ.
Of this objective, it is proposed to keep the improvement of knowledge on the effects of climate change on the marine environment separately and to incorporate the intention to consider this variable in the different phases of marine strategies.
|
Progress was noted.
In order to simplify, it is proposed to join all the objectives for the increase of knowledge in the following unit objective: âScientific studies and projects address the knowledge gaps identified in the ISâ
Of this objective, it is proposed to keep the improvement of knowledge on the effects of climate change on the marine environment separately and to incorporate the intention to consider this variable in the different phases of marine strategies.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|