Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D10 / Spain / Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D10 Litter
Member State Spain
Region/subregion Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea
Reported by Subdirección General para la protección del mar. D.G. Sostenibilidad de la Costa y del Mar. Minister
Report date 2020-02-03
Report access msfd2018-ART8GES_MOD2020.xml

Demarcación marina del Estrecho y Alborán (MWE-ES-SD-ESAL)

GES component
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
Feature
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Element
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Element code
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
Element code source
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Element 2
Caretta caretta
Mullus barbatus
Sardina pilchardus and Engraulis encrasicolus
Trachurus mediterraneus, Sardina pilchardus, Engraulis encrasicolus y Boops boops
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element source
National
National
National
Other
Other
Other
Other
Criterion
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C2
D10C3
D10C3
D10C3
D10C3
Parameter
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on water surface
Amount on coastline
Mass
Other
Other
Other
Parameter other
stomach contenio
Plenty of the anthropogenius
particulas antropogenicas
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
837.0
152.1
Value achieved lower
102.0
3.0
Value unit
Other
number of items per kilogram of dry weight
Value unit other
Average number of objects per beach
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
The beaches in the monitoring programme BM-1 in this catchment area are: Low water mark (Malaga), Carchuna (Granada) and Balerma (Almería). A total of 72 sampling campaigns have been carried out. Abundance: In the 72 campaigns carried out, a total of 25.277 objects were detected, with an average number of beaches accounted for by beach and a campaign of 351. Classification by category: Plastic items are the most common, 70.0 % of the total. A smaller proportion of paper or paperboard remains (12.5 %), hygiene and health residues (7.0 %), and scrap metals (4.8 %). The proportion obtained from paper/board is due to the abundance of cigarette filters that are to be classified in this category. More frequently found objects (Top X): The most common objects were made of non-identifiable plastic between 0 cm and 2.5 cm larger (19 % of the total), followed by cabites, or plastic drawstrings with a diameter of less than 1 cm (15.2 %), followed by plastic caps and lids (11.5 %) and colliding (10.1 %). Less cotton cotton buds or non-identifiable plastic parts, 2,5 to 50 cm, shall be found to a lesser extent. Trends: non-identifiable plastic fragments between 0 and 2.5 cm, and plastic strings with a diameter of less than 1 cm, plastic lids or corchos of plastic and cotton buds, show a clear and growing trend. Also, the French fries or cheheries stock showed a probably growing trend. Stable trend items were: Sacks and bottles made of plastic. Untended articles whose series do not show a clear trend, may be considered to be not increasing and are similar to a stable result, they are colliding, non-identifiable plastic parts between 2,5 and 50 cm, other objects identifiable, lines and cords with a diameter of more than 1 cm, other wooden parts smaller than 50 cm (e.g. tables), straws, cutlery and plates of plastic and beverage cans.
A laboratory quantification of the number of microplastic particles contained in the most surface sandal of the beaches where it is collected on the line of the last fishing trip 5 within a frame of 0,5 x 0.5 m. its concentration expressed as a number of particles per kg of sand and particles per m² is calculated. 3 beaches have been sampled in this demarcation. The average concentration obtained for the beaches of this Demarcación marina has been 38,3 particles/kg of sand, which is equivalent to 467,8 particles/m². The beach with the highest average concentration in the period 2016-2018 was San Miguel de Cabo de Gata (77,5 particles/kg) and the child was lowest in Carchuna (9,1 particles/kg). A significant variability has been detected in microplastic concentrations between the different campaigns. Almost all of the microplastic particles accounted for in the Demarcation of the Strait and Alborán Strait were smaller than 1 mm, the most frequent being smaller than 200 µm. Most of the particles accounted for are made up of particles (83.7 %) or expanded polystyrene particles (10.4 %). Pre-production pellets (2.4 %) or fibres/filaments (3.3 %) are in minority.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached.
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached.
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached.
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion. The non-identifiable plastic fragments between 0 and 2.5 cm, and plastic cords with a diameter of less than 1 cm and plastic caps and lids and cotton buds, show a growing trend. Stable trend items were: Buying bags and plastic bottles and bottles made of plastic. Untended articles whose series do not show a clear trend were colliding, non-identifiable plastic parts between 2,5 and 50 cm, other objects made of plastics, ropes and plastic cords (larger diameter of 1 cm), other wooden parts smaller than 50 cm (e.g. tables), straws, cutlery and plates of plastic and beverage cans.
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion. The non-identifiable plastic fragments between 0 and 2.5 cm, and plastic cords with a diameter of less than 1 cm and plastic caps and lids and cotton buds, show a growing trend. Stable trend items were: Buying bags and plastic bottles and bottles made of plastic. Untended articles whose series do not show a clear trend were colliding, non-identifiable plastic parts between 2,5 and 50 cm, other objects made of plastics, ropes and plastic cords (larger diameter of 1 cm), other wooden parts smaller than 50 cm (e.g. tables), straws, cutlery and plates of plastic and beverage cans.
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion. The non-identifiable plastic fragments between 0 and 2.5 cm, and plastic cords with a diameter of less than 1 cm and plastic caps and lids and cotton buds, show a growing trend. Stable trend items were: Buying bags and plastic bottles and bottles made of plastic. Untended articles whose series do not show a clear trend were colliding, non-identifiable plastic parts between 2,5 and 50 cm, other objects made of plastics, ropes and plastic cords (larger diameter of 1 cm), other wooden parts smaller than 50 cm (e.g. tables), straws, cutlery and plates of plastic and beverage cans.
It was established that these residues might be causing a blockage in their digestive system. The data obtained do not allow an assessment to be made of whether or not the State Ambiental fulfils this criterion. There is a high frequency in the presence of marine litter in the digestive contents of young loggerhead turtles located in the western Mediterranean. In any event, the quantities ingested by this species are low and do not seem to pose a significant threat to the survival of the populations in the region. This species can be a good indicator of pollution in the Mediterranean Sea, as proposed by the INDIILIT project through the standardised protocol for the assessment of marine litter in the loggerhead turtle, and values proposed by Matiddi et al. (2017).
Sampling during the IBERANULLUS 2014 campaign. Analysis of the stomach contents of Mullus barbatus (36 individuals) for the identification of microplastics under a binocular microscope. 13.9 % of the specimens of Mullus barbatus sampled in the Malaga area show an intake of microplastics. In view of the examples of the levantno-Balear, which is also the subject of the study set out here, an average value of 1,9 ± 1,29 microplastics/individual is obtained for Mullus barbatus in the Mediterranean area. All plastics ingested by the analysed fish are smaller than 5 mm. Conclusions cannot be drawn as to the spatial and temporal trends and the scope of the BEA.
MEDIAS International Acoustic Survey for 2015. Measured parameters: The abundance of man-made particulate events (number of anthropogenic/individual particles), colour, type polymers that make up anthropogenic particles
MEDITS (MEDITS) and Mediterranean International Bottom Trawl Survey (MEDITS) survey in 2015. Analysis of the stomach contents of Trachurus mediterraneus (87 individuals), Sardina pilchardus (20 individuals), Engraulis encrasicolus (39 individuals) and Boops boops (48 individuals) for the identification of anthropogenic particles under a stereomicroscope. Having regard to the demarcation of the Estrecho y Alborán and La levantino-bal-Saplico taken as a whole, 28 % of the samples that have been sampled have ingested anthropogenic particulate matter, with rates of higher intake rates on the Spanish mainland (36 %) than in the Balearic Islands (12 %). 43 % of the Trachours mediterraneus have shown intake of anthropogenic particles with mean values of 1,13 ± 1,99 anthropogenic/individual particles, while Engraulis encrasicolus has shown a lower anthropogenic intake with an average value of 0,03 ± 0,16 anthropogenic/individual particles and a rate of occurrence of 2.56 %. The maximum particles found in a single copy have been 11 anthropogenic particles, in a Engraulis encrasicolus stomach. Considering both areas of study, differences in the intake of anthropogenic particulate matter between these areas can be observed: 36.43 % of the analysed fish on the Spanish mainland intake of anthropogenic particles with an average value of 0,88 ± 1,72 anthropogenic/individual particles, while 12.31 % of the individuals sampled in the Balearic Islands have an average value of 0,20 ± 0,62 anthropogenic/individual. In both study areas, T. mediterraneus is the species with the highest percentages of intake: 44.16 % of the T. mediterraneus of the Peninsula, with an average value of 1,22 ± 2,08 anthropogenic/individual particles and 30 % of copies in the Balearic Islands with average values of 0,40 ± 0,70 anthropogenic/individual particles. By contrast, no intake of anthropogenic particles into species of E. encrasicolus in the Balearic Islands has been observed and only an average value of 0,07 ± 0,26 anthropogenic/individual particles has been detected in a specimen of E. encrasicolus. Conclusions cannot be drawn as to the spatial and temporal trends and the scope of the BEA.
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The non-identifiable plastic fragments between 0 and 2.5 cm, and plastic cords with a diameter of less than 1 cm and plastic caps and lids and cotton buds, show a growing trend. Stable trend items were: Buying bags and plastic bottles and bottles made of plastic. Untended articles whose series do not show a clear trend were colliding, non-identifiable plastic parts between 2,5 and 50 cm, other objects made of plastics, ropes and plastic cords (larger diameter of 1 cm), other wooden parts smaller than 50 cm (e.g. tables), straws, cutlery and plates of plastic and beverage cans.
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The non-identifiable plastic fragments between 0 and 2.5 cm, and plastic cords with a diameter of less than 1 cm and plastic caps and lids and cotton buds, show a growing trend. Stable trend items were: Buying bags and plastic bottles and bottles made of plastic. Untended articles whose series do not show a clear trend were colliding, non-identifiable plastic parts between 2,5 and 50 cm, other objects made of plastics, ropes and plastic cords (larger diameter of 1 cm), other wooden parts smaller than 50 cm (e.g. tables), straws, cutlery and plates of plastic and beverage cans.
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The non-identifiable plastic fragments between 0 and 2.5 cm, and plastic cords with a diameter of less than 1 cm and plastic caps and lids and cotton buds, show a growing trend. Stable trend items were: Buying bags and plastic bottles and bottles made of plastic. Untended articles whose series do not show a clear trend were colliding, non-identifiable plastic parts between 2,5 and 50 cm, other objects made of plastics, ropes and plastic cords (larger diameter of 1 cm), other wooden parts smaller than 50 cm (e.g. tables), straws, cutlery and plates of plastic and beverage cans.
No existe definición de Buen Estado Ambiental a nivel regional/subregional. el conocimiento científico actual no es suficiente para poder definir valores o concentraciones umbrales por encima de las cuales pueda sospecharse la existencia de efectos adversos para el medio marino por microplásticos
The results of the different projects analysed have not been integrated.
The results of the different projects analysed have not been integrated.
The results of the different projects analysed have not been integrated.
The results of the different projects analysed have not been integrated.
Assessments period
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2016-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
Related pressures
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
Related targets
  • AE10
  • BE1
  • BE15
  • BE16
  • BE17
  • BE18
  • BE2
  • BE3
  • BE4
  • BE5
  • BE6
  • CE15
  • CE16
  • CE18
  • CE6
  • CE7
  • CE8
  • AE10
  • BE1
  • BE15
  • BE16
  • BE17
  • BE18
  • BE2
  • BE3
  • BE4
  • BE5
  • BE6
  • CE15
  • CE16
  • CE18
  • CE6
  • CE7
  • CE8
  • AE10
  • BE1
  • BE15
  • BE16
  • BE17
  • BE18
  • BE2
  • BE3
  • BE4
  • BE5
  • BE6
  • CE15
  • CE16
  • CE18
  • CE6
  • CE7
  • CE8
  • AE10
  • BE1
  • BE15
  • BE16
  • BE17
  • BE18
  • BE2
  • BE3
  • BE4
  • BE5
  • BE6
  • CE15
  • CE16
  • CE18
  • CE6
  • CE7
  • CE8
  • AE10
  • BE1
  • BE15
  • BE16
  • BE17
  • BE18
  • BE2
  • BE3
  • BE4
  • BE5
  • BE6
  • CE15
  • CE16
  • CE18
  • CE6
  • CE7
  • CE8
  • AE10
  • BE1
  • BE15
  • BE16
  • BE17
  • BE18
  • BE2
  • BE3
  • BE4
  • BE5
  • BE6
  • CE15
  • CE16
  • CE18
  • CE6
  • CE7
  • CE8
  • AE10
  • BE1
  • BE15
  • BE16
  • BE17
  • BE18
  • BE2
  • BE3
  • BE4
  • BE5
  • BE6
  • CE15
  • CE16
  • CE18
  • CE6
  • CE7
  • CE8
  • AE10
  • BE1
  • BE15
  • BE16
  • BE17
  • BE18
  • BE2
  • BE3
  • BE4
  • BE5
  • BE6
  • CE15
  • CE16
  • CE18
  • CE6
  • CE7
  • CE8

Demarcación marina levantino-balear (MWE-ES-SD-LEV)

GES component
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
Feature
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Element
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Element code
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
FI_Macrolitter
Element code source
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Element 2
Boops boops
Caretta caretta
Galeus melastomus
Mullus barbatus
Mullus surmuletus
Sardina pilchardus and Engraulis encrasicolus
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element source
National
National
National
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Criterion
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C2
D10C2
D10C3
D10C3
D10C3
D10C3
D10C3
D10C3
Parameter
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on water surface
Amount on coastline
Other
Other
Mass
Other
Other
Other
Other
Parameter other
Microplastics in sediments
ingested microwells
analysis of stomach contents
microplatetics
quantity of microplasmas ingested
plenty of the anthropogenius
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
995.0
199.0
Value achieved lower
84.0
1.0
Value unit
Other
number of items per kilogram of dry weight
number of items per kilogram of dry weight
Value unit other
Average number of objects per beach
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Stable
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
The beaches in the monitoring programme BM-1 in this catchment area are: La Plana (Murcia), La Gola (Alicante), Marenys (Valencia), La Baseta (Castellón), Eualiptus (Tarragona), Cal Francesc (Barcelona), Can Comes (Girona), Es Trenc (Palma) and Levante (Formentera). A total of 206 sampling campaigns were carried out. Abundance: During the 206 campaigns carried out, a total count of 76.139 objects was carried out, with an average number of objects counted per beach and a campaign of 370. Classification by category: Plastic items are the most common (67.8 %) and, to a lesser extent, paper or paperboard remains (14.1 %), hygiene and health residues (8.4 %) and metal (3.1 %). The proportion obtained from paper/board is due to the abundance of cigarette filters that are to be classified in this category. More frequently found objects (Top X): The most common objects were made of non-identifiable plastic between 0 cm and 2.5 cm and between 2,5 and 50 cm in size in the larger of their size and reached 30.5 % of the total. Cigarette butts make up 12.4 % of the total. To a lesser extent plastic tops or caps of 7.0 %, cabilites and/or plastic strings with a diameter of less than 1 cm or 6.9 %, or cotton buds, were found to be 6.8 %. Trends: the shopping bags (or pieces recognisable with them) show a clear and growing trend. On the other hand, the unidentifiable plastic parts between 2,5 and 50 cm and the chips, packets, cheerías and ice cream pouches have shown a decreasing trend, which is likely to be decreasing respectively. The articles whose series do not show a clear trend, may be considered to be not increasing and are similar to a stable result, are pieces of non-identifiable plastic between 0 and 2.5 cm, colliks of cigarettes, crabths, cords or strings of plastic (diameter less than 1 cm), other objects identifiable or their plastic fragments, synthetic foams (e.g. pieces of polyurethane), beverage can rings, other articles of paper or paperboard (e.g. serviettes).
The bottom litter on the continental shelf has continued to be observed with the MEDITS funds conducted by the IEO. Some research studies have been published analysing distribution, trends, etc. using this data by the Joint Research Unit between the IEO and the University of Alicante. The composition, spatial distribution and temporary evolution of marine litter in the Spanish Mediterranean seabed were assessed. The data stem from MEDITS MEDITS surveys of over 11 years and analysed by GIS. A total quantity of 2 197.8 kg of litter was collected. Marine litter (by weight) consisted of plastic (29.3 %), clinker (28.4 %), wood (10.2 %), metal (9.7 %) and glass (6.2 %). Its density varies between areas (Alboran Sea > Valencia, Alboran Island > Tramontana). Marine litter has been stable or decreasing in some cases over the last 11 years. The information provided by this study is a useful baseline for studying these residues in the Spanish marine fund. The MEDITS survey has proven to be an appropriate monitoring tool, also of use to assess future control measures. In addition, in the Gulf of Alicante, the composition, the spatial distribution and the marine litter source were assessed. The data come from a marine litter retention programme implemented by commercial trawlers and analysed by GIS. By weight, 75.9 % were plastic, metal and glass. Glass and plastics were mainly found close to the coast. A high metal concentration was observed in some areas isolated from both open and coastal waters. Fishing activity was the source of 29.16 % of the marine litter, almost 68.1 % of the plastics and 25.1 % of the metal. The source of the other 60.84 % could not be directly identified, which reveals the high degree of uncertainty as to its specific origin. Indirectly, however, a qualitative analysis of maritime traffic shows that the likely sources were the merchant vessels, mainly in open waters and recreational vessels and fishing vessels in coastal waters.
A laboratory quantification of the number of microplastic particles contained in the most surface sandal of the beaches where it is collected on the line of the last fishing trip 5 within a frame of 0,5 x 0.5 m. its concentration expressed as a number of particles per kg of sand and particles per m² is calculated. 4 beaches have been sampled in this demarcation. The average concentration obtained for the beaches of this Demarcación marina has been 28,9 particles/kg of sand, which is equivalent to 288,8 particles/m². The beach presenting the highest average concentration in the period 2016-2018 was that of La Pineda (69,4 particles/kg) and the child was the lowest in Marenys (8,7 particles/kg). The analysis of the distribution of the particle size ranges indicates that the beaches of this Demarcation list all the ranges concerned, although the highest concentration corresponds to a size of less than 200 µm. most of the particles accounted for correspond to pre-production pellets (61.8 %), which occasionally have appeared on the beach in La Pineda and fragments (26.9 %). There are much less frequent particles of expanded polystyrene (6.3 %), fibres or filaments (2.6 %) or gomafoam (2 %).
Population density and sediment grain size. No link was observed between these variables and the concentration of microplastics.
3,75 ± 0,25 microplastics/individual.
A high variety has been detected between the rates of occurrence of microplastics that are grafted as a result of specimens from the different sampling sites: Barcelona (33 %), Cartagena (11.1 %), Mahón (10 %) and Ciutadella (20 %). The increased abundance of microplastics has been observed in the stomach contents of Mullus barbatus from Barcelona with an average value of 1,75 ± 1,14 microplastics/individual. Considering the fish of Malaga (demarcation of the Strait and Alborán strait), this study has obtained an average value of 1,9 ± 1,29 microplastics/individual for Mullus barbatus in the Mediterranean area.
0,04 ± 0,04 MPs/individuo (Port d´Andratx; arte de pesca de arrastre) y 1,07 ± 0,26 MPs/individuos (Santanyí; artes de pesca de trasmallo)
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached.
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached.
Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached.
Insufficient data to evaluate the BEA. In the absence of defined threshold values such an assessment can only be carried out by analysing the trend and it is estimated that data for at least 6 consecutive years would be required for this trend.
Insufficient data to evaluate the BEA. In the absence of defined threshold values such an assessment can only be carried out by analysing the trend and it is estimated that data for at least 6 consecutive years would be required for this trend.
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion. The bags of the purchase (or of recognisable pieces thereof) show a clear trend growth. moreover, the plastic parts that are not identifiable between 2,5 and 50 cm and the chips, packets, cheerías and ice creams have shown a downward trend and are likely to be gradually decreasing. the articles whose series do not show a clear trend can be regarded as not increasing and are similar to a stable result, are pieces of non-identifiable plastic between 0 cm and 2.5 cm, colliters with plastic products or their plastic fragments, other ceramic articles or articles of plastics, synthetic foams, metal caps and articles of paper or paperboard.
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion. The bags of the purchase (or of recognisable pieces thereof) show a clear trend growth. moreover, the plastic parts that are not identifiable between 2,5 and 50 cm and the chips, packets, cheerías and ice creams have shown a downward trend and are likely to be gradually decreasing. the articles whose series do not show a clear trend can be regarded as not increasing and are similar to a stable result, are pieces of non-identifiable plastic between 0 cm and 2.5 cm, colliters with plastic products or their plastic fragments, other ceramic articles or articles of plastics, synthetic foams, metal caps and articles of paper or paperboard.
Marine litter (excluding microlitter), classified by category of object, is evaluated under D10C1. See section on evaluation results at this criterion. The bags of the purchase (or of recognisable pieces thereof) show a clear trend growth. moreover, the plastic parts that are not identifiable between 2,5 and 50 cm and the chips, packets, cheerías and ice creams have shown a downward trend and are likely to be gradually decreasing. the articles whose series do not show a clear trend can be regarded as not increasing and are similar to a stable result, are pieces of non-identifiable plastic between 0 cm and 2.5 cm, colliters with plastic products or their plastic fragments, other ceramic articles or articles of plastics, synthetic foams, metal caps and articles of paper or paperboard.
2,47 ± 0,23 microplastics/individual) (p < 0,01). Conclusions cannot be drawn as to the spatial and temporal trends and the scope of the BEA.
Through the INDIILC project (https://indicit-europa.eu/), in which Spain participates, data on the ingestion of marine litter by the Caretta caretta species in the Western Mediterranean sub-region have been analysed for the first time, applying the Marine Strategy Framework Directive approach. The waste has been quantified and catalogued by 155 specimens from the Southern head of Tortuga (Caretta caretta), harvested in the waters of the western Mediterranean (north-east Spain), for the period 1995-2016. The contents of the intestines of 155 bologgerhead turtles were examined for the purpose of checking and analysing the food waste. The individuals were harvested dead by the stranding network of the Comunidad Valenciana between 1995 and 2016. The sea turtles were mixed (68) or caught accidentally by trawl, longline or small-scale fishing nets, mainly gill nets (87), operating in the region. a total of 4423 items of waste were collected in 10 of the 15 subcategories in 121 (78.1 %), with a total dry weight of 406.9 g and a total wet volume of 930.3 ml. The most frequent ones are plastic, and organic non-food residues (69.0 % and 60.9 % respectively). There is a high frequency in the presence of marine litter in the digestive contents of young loggerhead turtles located in the western Mediterranean. In any event, the quantities ingested by this species are low and do not seem to pose a significant threat to the survival of the populations in the region. The data obtained do not make it possible to conclude whether the BEA is reached.
Analysis of the stomach contents of Galeus melastomus (125 individuals) for the identification of microplastics under a binocular microscope. Sampling between February 2015 and May 2015. Measured parameters: Abundance of ingested microplastic (number of micropalace/individual and number of microplastics/individual fresh weight), colour, type and polymers that make up microplastics. The length, fresh weight and sex of Galeus melastomus. 18.18 % of the individuals sampled in Soller used microplastics with an average value of 0.32 ± 0.11 MPs/individual, while in Palma 16.05 % of the individuals analysed presented an intake of microplastics with an average value of 0.35 ± 0.10 MPs/ind. In both towns, the maximum value of microplastics observed in one individual was 4 microplastics. No significant correlation between size of individuals and number of microplastics ingested by individual (r
Sampling during the IBERANMULLUS 2014 campaign on the Spanish Mediterranean coast, Barcelona (36 individuals), Cartagena (36 individuals) and the Balearic Islands Ciutadella (10 individuals) and Mahón (10 individuals). Analysis of the stomach contents of Mullus barbatus (92 individuals) for the identification of microplastics under a binocular microscope. Measured parameters: Abundance of ingested microplastic (number of microplastics/individual), size, colour and form of microplastics. A high variety has been detected between the rates of occurrence of microplastics that are grafted as a result of specimens from the different sampling sites: Barcelona (33 %), Cartagena (11.1 %), Mahón (10 %) and Ciutadella (20 %). The increased abundance of microplastics has been observed in the stomach contents of Mullus barbatus from Barcelona with an average value of 1,75 ± 1,14 microplastics/individual. Considering the fish of Malaga (demarcation of the Strait and Alborán strait), this study has obtained an average value of 1,9 ± 1,29 microplastics/individual for Mullus barbatus in the Mediterranean area. All plastics ingested by the analysed fish are smaller than 5 mm. Conclusions cannot be drawn as to the spatial and temporal trends and the scope of the BEA.
P < 0,05 for trammel net). The vast majority of the identified microplastics were filament (97 %) and in relation to the characterisation of polymers with Infratrojo’s spectroscopy techniques with Transformed of Fourier (FTIR), PET (36.36 %) followed by cellophane (30.30 %) and polyacrylate (15.15 %) were the most common polymers of the identified microplastics. A total of nine colours were counted in the identified microplastics, the most common being blue (30.30 %) followed by black (27.27 %) and transparent (21.21 %). Conclusions cannot be drawn as to the spatial and temporal trends and the scope of the BEA.
Total length, weight, maturity status of species (Sardina pilchardus and Engraulis encrasicolus)
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The bags of the purchase (or of recognisable pieces thereof) show a clear trend growth. moreover, the plastic parts that are not identifiable between 2,5 and 50 cm and the chips, packets, cheerías and ice creams have shown a downward trend and are likely to be gradually decreasing. the articles whose series do not show a clear trend can be regarded as not increasing and are similar to a stable result, are pieces of non-identifiable plastic between 0 cm and 2.5 cm, colliters with plastic products or their plastic fragments, other ceramic articles or articles of plastics, synthetic foams, metal caps and articles of paper or paperboard.
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The bags of the purchase (or of recognisable pieces thereof) show a clear trend growth. moreover, the plastic parts that are not identifiable between 2,5 and 50 cm and the chips, packets, cheerías and ice creams have shown a downward trend and are likely to be gradually decreasing. the articles whose series do not show a clear trend can be regarded as not increasing and are similar to a stable result, are pieces of non-identifiable plastic between 0 cm and 2.5 cm, colliters with plastic products or their plastic fragments, other ceramic articles or articles of plastics, synthetic foams, metal caps and articles of paper or paperboard.
The definition of ‘Good Environmental Status’ remains: That where the amount of marine litter, including its degradation products, on the coast and in the marine environment decreases (or is reduced) over time and is at levels that do not result in harmful effects on the marine and coastal environment. Commission Decision 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and evaluation, and repealing Decision 2010/477/EU, provides that Member States shall determine threshold values through cooperation at Union level, taking into account regional or subregional specificities. The European Commission’s Marine Quarantine Technical Group (TG-ML) is carrying out work to determine the threshold value in which Spain is contributing, without the process having been finalised and the results that can be gathered in this document for the time being. Article 4.2 of that Decision states that until Member States do not establish threshold values through cooperation at Union level they may use directional trends of the values to express the degree of achievement of good environmental status. Evaluation conclusions: Based on the data from the marine litter monitoring programme on beaches in the Ministry for Ecological Transition, there is no decrease in total marine litter abundance in the time series 2013-2018, so that the BEA is not reached. The bags of the purchase (or of recognisable pieces thereof) show a clear trend growth. moreover, the plastic parts that are not identifiable between 2,5 and 50 cm and the chips, packets, cheerías and ice creams have shown a downward trend and are likely to be gradually decreasing. the articles whose series do not show a clear trend can be regarded as not increasing and are similar to a stable result, are pieces of non-identifiable plastic between 0 cm and 2.5 cm, colliters with plastic products or their plastic fragments, other ceramic articles or articles of plastics, synthetic foams, metal caps and articles of paper or paperboard.
No existe definición de Buen Estado Ambiental a nivel regional/subregional. el conocimiento científico actual no es suficiente para poder definir valores o concentraciones umbrales por encima de las cuales pueda sospecharse la existencia de efectos adversos para el medio marino por microplásticos
No existe definición de Buen Estado Ambiental a nivel regional/subregional. el conocimiento científico actual no es suficiente para poder definir valores o concentraciones umbrales por encima de las cuales pueda sospecharse la existencia de efectos adversos para el medio marino por microplásticos
They have not been able to integrate the results of the different projects analysed.
They have not been able to integrate the results of the different projects analysed.
They have not been able to integrate the results of the different projects analysed.
They have not been able to integrate the results of the different projects analysed.
They have not been able to integrate the results of the different projects analysed.
They have not been able to integrate the results of the different projects analysed.
Assessments period
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2016-2018
2016-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
Related pressures
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
Related targets
  • AL10
  • BL1
  • BL10
  • BL11
  • BL12
  • BL13
  • BL16
  • BL17
  • BL18
  • BL3
  • BL4
  • BL5
  • BL7
  • BL8
  • BL9
  • CL15
  • CL16
  • CL18
  • CL6
  • CL7
  • CL8
  • AL10
  • BL1
  • BL10
  • BL11
  • BL12
  • BL13
  • BL16
  • BL17
  • BL18
  • BL3
  • BL4
  • BL5
  • BL7
  • BL8
  • BL9
  • CL15
  • CL16
  • CL18
  • CL6
  • CL7
  • CL8
  • AL10
  • BL1
  • BL10
  • BL11
  • BL12
  • BL13
  • BL16
  • BL17
  • BL18
  • BL3
  • BL4
  • BL5
  • BL7
  • BL8
  • BL9
  • CL15
  • CL16
  • CL18
  • CL6
  • CL7
  • CL8
  • AL10
  • BL1
  • BL10
  • BL11
  • BL12
  • BL13
  • BL16
  • BL17
  • BL18
  • BL3
  • BL4
  • BL5
  • BL7
  • BL8
  • BL9
  • CL15
  • CL16
  • CL18
  • CL6
  • CL7
  • CL8
  • AL10
  • BL1
  • BL10
  • BL11
  • BL12
  • BL13
  • BL16
  • BL17
  • BL18
  • BL3
  • BL4
  • BL5
  • BL7
  • BL8
  • BL9
  • CL15
  • CL16
  • CL18
  • CL6
  • CL7
  • CL8
  • AL10
  • BL1
  • BL10
  • BL11
  • BL12
  • BL13
  • BL16
  • BL17
  • BL18
  • BL3
  • BL4
  • BL5
  • BL7
  • BL8
  • BL9
  • CL15
  • CL16
  • CL18
  • CL6
  • CL7
  • CL8
  • AL10
  • BL1
  • BL10
  • BL11
  • BL12
  • BL13
  • BL16
  • BL17
  • BL18
  • BL3
  • BL4
  • BL5
  • BL7
  • BL8
  • BL9
  • CL15
  • CL16
  • CL18
  • CL6
  • CL7
  • CL8
  • AL10
  • BL1
  • BL10
  • BL11
  • BL12
  • BL13
  • BL16
  • BL17
  • BL18
  • BL3
  • BL4
  • BL5
  • BL7
  • BL8
  • BL9
  • CL15
  • CL16
  • CL18
  • CL6
  • CL7
  • CL8
  • AL10
  • BL1
  • BL10
  • BL11
  • BL12
  • BL13
  • BL16
  • BL17
  • BL18
  • BL3
  • BL4
  • BL5
  • BL7
  • BL8
  • BL9
  • CL15
  • CL16
  • CL18
  • CL6
  • CL7
  • CL8
  • AL10
  • BL1
  • BL10
  • BL11
  • BL12
  • BL13
  • BL16
  • BL17
  • BL18
  • BL3
  • BL4
  • BL5
  • BL7
  • BL8
  • BL9
  • CL15
  • CL16
  • CL18
  • CL6
  • CL7
  • CL8
  • AL10
  • BL1
  • BL10
  • BL11
  • BL12
  • BL13
  • BL16
  • BL17
  • BL18
  • BL3
  • BL4
  • BL5
  • BL7
  • BL8
  • BL9
  • CL15
  • CL16
  • CL18
  • CL6
  • CL7
  • CL8