Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-B / Finland / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D1 Birds
Member State Finland
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Reported by Finnish Environment Institute
Report date 2019-04-10
Report access msfd2018-ART8_GES_8Jan2019update_24_.xml

National part of Åland Sea (BAL-FI-AS)

GES component
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
Feature
Benthic-feeding birds
Benthic-feeding birds
Benthic-feeding birds
Grazing birds
Grazing birds
Grazing birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Wading birds
Element
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Wading birds (grouped)
Element code
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_wading
Element code source
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
Criterion
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C2
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Abundance
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Abundance
Parameter other
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Threshold value upper
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
33.0
67.0
80.0
71.0
80.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Value unit other
%
%
%
%
%
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Deteriorating
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Unknown
Deteriorating
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Stable
Parameter achieved
Unknown
No
Unknown
Yes, based on low risk
No
Yes, based on low risk
Unknown
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
No
Yes, based on low risk
Yes
Description parameter
Bycatch of long-tailed duck is suspected from this assessment unit.
HELCOM core indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
The hunting of long-tailed duck has increased in the recent year to 10-15000 ind. but the hunting of the common eider has decreased to ca 2000 ind. in the entire country No mass mortality of birds has taken place.
No reported bycatch of grazing birds
HELCOM core indicators: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
In average ca 7000 greylag geese are shot each year in the entire country. No mass mortality of birds has takenplace in this assessment unit.
Bycatch of black guillemots is reported from this assessment unit.
HELCOM core indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season
No hunting of pelagic feeding birds. Zero mass mortality of these in this assessment unit. Culling of great cormorant is about 700 ind. per year.
No reported bycatch of surface-feeding birds.
HELCOM core indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season
No mass mortality of surface feeding birds has taken in this assessment unit. No hunting takes place but some culling of gulls is permitted.
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf
Related indicator
Criteria status
Unknown
Not good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Not good
Good, based on low risk
Unknown
Good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Not good
Good, based on low risk
Good
Description criteria
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
Integration rule description parameter
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline.
Integration rule type criteria
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
Integration rule description criteria
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES achieved
Description overall status
.
.
.
Only one criterion (abundance) was used. Only breeding wading birds occur in the area.
Assessments period
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
Related pressures
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
Related targets
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5

National part of Bothnian Bay (BAL-FI-BB)

GES component
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
Feature
Benthic-feeding birds
Benthic-feeding birds
Benthic-feeding birds
Grazing birds
Grazing birds
Grazing birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Wading birds
Element
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Wading birds (grouped)
Element code
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_wading
Element code source
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
Criterion
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C2
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Abundance
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Abundance
Parameter other
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Threshold value upper
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
50.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Value unit other
Number of bycaught individuals
%
Individuals
Number of bycaught individuals
%
Individuals
Number of bycaught individuals
%
Individuals
Number of bycaught individuals
%
Individuals
%
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Improving
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Stable
Parameter achieved
Yes, based on low risk
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
No
Description parameter
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf
No bird mass mortalities have occurred in this assessment unit.
No bycaught individuals in the assessment unit.
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf
Hunting has decreased in recent decades. In average, 7000 greylag geese were shot in the whole country annually 2011-2016. No mass mortalities have occurred in the assessment unit.
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf
No bird mass mortalities have occurred in this assessment unit.
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf
No bird mass mortalities have occurred in this assessment unit.
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf
Related indicator
Criteria status
Good, based on low risk
Good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Good
Good, based on low risk
Not good
Description criteria
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The indicators on hunting and mass mosrtalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
Element status
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
Integration rule description parameter
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
Integration rule type criteria
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
Integration rule description criteria
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
Description overall status
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only one criterion (abundance) was used. Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Assessments period
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
Related pressures
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
Related targets
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5

National part of Bothnian Sea (BAL-FI-BS)

GES component
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
Feature
Benthic-feeding birds
Benthic-feeding birds
Benthic-feeding birds
Grazing birds
Grazing birds
Grazing birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Wading birds
Element
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Wading birds (grouped)
Element code
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_wading
Element code source
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
Criterion
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C2
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Abundance
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Abundance
Parameter other
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
75
75
75
75
75
Threshold value source
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
67.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
50.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Value unit other
%
individuals
%
%
%
%
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Deteriorating
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Stable
Parameter achieved
Yes, based on low risk
No
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
Unknown
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
No
Description parameter
No bycatch of benthic-feeding birds has been reported from this assessment unit.
HELCOM core indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
The hunting of long-tailed duck has increased in the recent year to 10-15000 ind. but the hunting of the common eider has decreased to ca 2000 ind. No mass mortality of birds has taken place.
No bycatch of grazing birds is reported in the assessment unit.
HELCOM core indicators: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
Hunting of , in average 7000, greylag geese takes place annually in the entire country. No mass mortality of birds in the assessment unit.
Black guillemot is reported being bycaught in this assessment unit.
HELCOM core indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
No hunting of pelagic feeding birds and no mass mortality of them occurs in this assessment unit. Great cormorant is abundances and breeding colonies are, however, controlled by culling and destroying nests. This has increased during the assessment period and ca. 700 individuals are shot each year.
Zero reported surface-feeding bird species in the assessment unit.
HELCOM core indicators: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
No hunting of surface-feeding birds takes place and no mass mortality has taken place in the assessment unit.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Good, based on low risk
Not good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Good
Good, based on low risk
Not good
Description criteria
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
Integration rule description parameter
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
Integration rule type criteria
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
Integration rule description criteria
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
Interim rule applied
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
Description overall status
.
.
.
Only one criterion (abundance) was used. Wintering wading birds do not occur in the area.
Assessments period
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
Related pressures
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
Related targets
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5

National part of Gulf of Finland (BAL-FI-GF)

GES component
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
Feature
Benthic-feeding birds
Benthic-feeding birds
Benthic-feeding birds
Grazing birds
Grazing birds
Grazing birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Wading birds
Element
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Wading birds (grouped)
Element code
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_wading
Element code source
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
Criterion
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C2
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Abundance
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Abundance
Parameter other
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Abundance of breeding water birds
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Threshold value upper
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
33.0
100.0
67.0
17.0
67.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Value unit other
%
%
%
%
%
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Stable
Parameter achieved
Unknown
No
Unknown
Yes, based on low risk
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
No
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
No
No
No
Description parameter
Bycatch of two species have been reported.
No mass mortality of benthic feeders has taken place. Each year ca 14000 long-tailed ducks and ca 2000 common eiders are hunted in the entire country.
Zero bycatch of grazing birds.
HELCOM core indicators: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-waterbirds-in-the-breeding-season/
A mass mortality event of barnacle geese took place in 2017 with 131 died birds found. Hunting of greylag geese is in average 7000 per year in the entire country.
Some bycatch of black guillemot has been reported from this assessment unit.
No hunting of pelagic feeding birds and no mass mortality of them occurs in this assessment unit. Great cormorant is abundances and breeding colonies are, however, controlled by culling and destroying nests. This has increased during the assessment period and ca. 700 individuals are shot each year.
Zero bycatch reported for surface feeders in this assessment unit.
A mass mortality event of herring gulls (462 died observed) in 2017. No hunting of surface feeders but some permitted culling of herring gulls.
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf
Related indicator
Criteria status
Unknown
Not good
Unknown
Good, based on low risk
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Not good
Not good
Not good
Description criteria
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The mass mortality and hunting indicators reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The mass mortality and hunting indicators reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The mass mortality and hunting indicators reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The mass mortality and hunting indicators reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
Integration rule description parameter
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
HELCOM uses the HELCOM BEAT tool to integrate the two bird indicators: core indicators for breeding bird species and wintering bird species. Method description: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. In summary, 75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline. The two indicators are integrated by averaging their ratios .
Integration rule type criteria
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
Description overall status
Only one criterion (abundance) was used. Wintering wading birds do not occur in the area.
Assessments period
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
Related pressures
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
Related targets
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5

National part of The Quark (BAL-FI-QK)

GES component
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
D1-B
Feature
Benthic-feeding birds
Benthic-feeding birds
Benthic-feeding birds
Grazing birds
Grazing birds
Grazing birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Wading birds
Element
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Benthic-feeding birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Grazing birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Pelagic-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Surface-feeding birds (grouped)
Wading birds (grouped)
Element code
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_benthicF
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_grazing
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_pelagicF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_surfaceF
FI_Birds_wading
Element code source
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
Criterion
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C2
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Other
Survival rate
Other
Parameter other
Abundance of breeding birds
Abundance of breeding birds
Abundance of breeding birds
Abundance of breeding birds
Abundance of breeding birds
Threshold value upper
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
https://webforms.eionet.europa.eu/download/user_file?fileId=70077
https://webforms.eionet.europa.eu/download/user_file?fileId=70077
https://webforms.eionet.europa.eu/download/user_file?fileId=70077
https://webforms.eionet.europa.eu/download/user_file?fileId=70077
Threshold value source
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
67.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
50.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Other
percentage
Other
Other
percentage
Other
Other
percentage
Other
Other
percentage
Other
percentage
Value unit other
individuals
individuals
individuals
individuals
individuals
individuals
individuals
individuals
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Stable
Parameter achieved
Yes, based on low risk
No
Unknown
Yes, based on low risk
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
No
Description parameter
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
In average 14300 ducks are shot annually on the coast and this number has decreased. No mass mortality has taken place in this assessment unit.
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
In average 7000 greylag geese are shot annually in the whole country. No mass mortalities have occurred in this assessment unit.
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
In average 700 great cormorants are culled each year in the country (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/pressures-and-their-status/species-removal-by-fishing-and-hunting/#hunting-of-waterbirds). No mass mortalities occur in this assessment unit.
No bycatch in this assessment unit.
No hunting of these bird species and no mass mortality occurs in this assessment unit.
http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/Abundance%20of%20waterbirds%20in%20the%20breeding%20season%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf
Related indicator
Criteria status
Good, based on low risk
Not good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Good
Good, based on low risk
Good, based on low risk
Good
Good, based on low risk
Not good
Description criteria
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The HELCOM bycatch indicator reflects the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
The indicators on hunting and mass mortalities reflect the pressure on population abundance. GES is not assessed for this criterion but the assessment contributes to the D1C2 'Population abundance'.
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
MULTIMETRIC
Integration rule description parameter
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
75% of all species abundance trends should stay within a 30% limit from the baseline (HELCOM core indicator for breeding bird species).
Integration rule type criteria
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
Integration rule description criteria
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
Interim rule applied.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
Description overall status
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Only one criterion (abundance) was used. Only breeding birds were used because wintering birds do not exist in the area.
Assessments period
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
Related pressures
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • Input or spread of non-indigenous species
Related targets
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVAYLEINEN
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5
  • LUVA3
  • LUONTO2
  • LUONTO3
  • LUONTO5