Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D5 / France / NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D5 Eutrophication |
Member State | France |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas |
Reported by | Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire |
Report date | 2020-02-19 |
Report access | ART8_GES_FR_2020-02-17.xml |
ZL SRM MC (ACS-FR-MS-MC-LARGE)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Nutrients (N, P) |
Nutrients (N, P) |
Chlorophyll-a |
Transparency |
Dissolved oxygen |
Opportunistic macro-algae |
Macrophyte communities |
Element code |
QE3-1-6 |
QE3-1-6 |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
QE3-1-1 |
EEA_3132-01-2 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2 |
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Element 2 |
|||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
D5C6
|
D5C7
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Concentration in water
|
Other
|
Concentration in water
|
||
Parameter other |
Concentration of DIN in water
|
Concentration of DIP in water
|
Turbidity of the water column
|
||||
Threshold value upper |
20.3 |
0.8 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
13.6 |
0.5 |
2.8 |
5.37 |
7.77 |
||
Value achieved lower |
6.22 |
0.42 |
0.83 |
0.75 |
6.75 |
||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
Other
|
milligram per litre
|
||
Value unit other |
NTU
|
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||
Proportion value achieved |
86.0 |
86.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
86.0 |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||
Description parameter |
The indicator for this parameter makes it possible to assess good nutrient status (DIN and DIP) at the scale of each coastal water body or grid box (intermediate and wide areas). In intermediate and wide areas: the parameter relating to "DIN concentration in water" is based on data from the hydrodynamic and biological model ECO-MARS3D (https://wwz.ifremer.fr/mars3d/). From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each grid cell and corresponds to the median nitrate and DIP (phosphate) concentration for the evaluation period. The result of the metric calculation is then compared with the threshold values to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the grid cell in question. Thus, the evaluation of the Nitrogen Element Parameter (DIN) shows that 86% of the wide area reaches the parameter and 14% of the wide area could not be evaluated. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude on whether the parameter assessed at the MRU level has been reached or not.
|
The indicator for this parameter makes it possible to assess good nutrient status (DIN and DIP) at the scale of each coastal water body or grid box (intermediate and wide areas). In intermediate and wide areas: the parameter relating to "DIP concentration" is based on data from the hydrodynamic and biological model ECO-MARS3D (https://wwz.ifremer.fr/mars3d/). From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each grid cell and corresponds to the median nitrate and DIP (phosphate) concentration for the evaluation period. The result of the metric calculation is then compared with the threshold values to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the grid cell in question. Thus, the evaluation of the parameter relating to phosphorus elements (DIP) shows that 86% of the wide area reaches the parameter and that 14% of the wide area could not be evaluated. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude on whether the parameter assessed at the MRU level has been reached or not.
|
In intermediate and wide areas, the parameter "concentration in water" of chlorophyll-a is based on data from satellite images (MODIS sensor). From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each grid cell and corresponds to the 90 percentile of surface chlorophyll-a concentrations for the assessment period. The result of the calculation of the metric is then compared with the threshold values to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the grid cell in question. Thus, the assessment of the parameter relating to the chlorophyll-a concentration shows that 100% of the wide area reaches the parameter. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude on whether the parameter assessed at the MRU level has been reached or not.
|
In intermediate and wide areas, the turbidity parameter in the water column is based on data from satellite images (MODIS sensor). From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each grid cell and corresponds to the 90 percentile of the transparency of the water column for the evaluation period. The result of the metric calculation is then compared with the threshold values to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the grid box in question. Thus, the evaluation of the water transparency parameter shows that 100% of the wide area reaches the parameter. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude on whether the parameter assessed at the MRU level has been reached or not.
|
In intermediate and wide areas, the parameter "dissolved oxygen concentration at the bottom" is based on data from the hydrodynamic and biological model ECO-MARS3D (https://wwz.ifremer.fr/mars3d/). From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each grid cell and corresponds to the 10th percentile of the bottom dissolved oxygen concentrations for the assessment period. Thus, the assessment of the parameter relating to the bottom dissolved oxygen concentration shows that 86% of the wide area reaches the parameter and that 14% of the wide area could not be assessed. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude whether the parameter assessed at the MRU level has been reached.
|
||
Related indicator |
|||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
The evaluation of criterion D5C1 shall be carried out at the scale of each grid box considered individually. The D5C1 status of each grid cell shall be obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration of the parameters for DIn and DIP concentrations. In the absence of a threshold for the percentage of the MRU in good condition, the status of the D5C1 criterion is therefore indicated as "unknown".
|
The evaluation of criterion D5C1 shall be carried out at the scale of each grid box considered individually. The D5C1 status of each grid cell shall be obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration of the parameters for DIn and DIP concentrations. In the absence of a threshold for the percentage of the MRU in good condition, the status of the D5C1 criterion is therefore indicated as "unknown".
|
The evaluation of criterion D5C2 shall be carried out at the scale of each grid box considered individually. The D5C2 status of each grid cell is obtained directly from the assessment of the chlorophyll-a concentration parameter. If there is no threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C2 is therefore set to "unknown".
|
The evaluation of criterion D5C4 shall be carried out at the scale of each grid box considered individually. The status of each grid cell under D5C4 is obtained directly by evaluating the water transparency parameter . If there is no threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C4 is therefore set to "unknown".
|
The evaluation of criterion D5C5 shall be carried out at the scale of each grid box considered individually. The status of each cell under D5C5 is obtained directly by evaluating the parameter relating to the dissolved oxygen concentration. If there is no threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C5 is therefore set to "unknown".
|
Criterion D5C6 is "Not relevant" in this MRU, relating to the broad area of the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region, as it is assessed only in the coastal zone. Indeed, opportunistic algal blooms are only expressed at the coastal level of French waters, via stranding phenomena.
|
Criterion D5C7 is "Not relevant" in this MRU, relating to the broad area of the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region, as it is assessed only in the coastal zone. This is because perennial meadows and macroalgae do not grow below a certain depth (need for light), and because the depth is generally proportional to the distance from the coast, most of these meadows and macroalgae populations are mostly located in the coastal zone.
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
The assessment of criterion D5C1 shows that for DIN and DIP concentrations: 86 % of the MRU (27422 km2 ) achieves good ecological status and 14 % of the MRU (4464 km2 ) is not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C1 shows that for DIN and DIP concentrations: 86 % of the MRU (27422 km2 ) achieves good ecological status and 14 % of the MRU (4464 km2 ) is not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C2 shows that 100 % of the MRU (i.e. 31886 km2 ) achieves good ecological status with respect to chlrophyl a concentration.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C4 shows that 100 % of the MRU (i.e. 31886 km2 ) achieves good ecological status with respect to water transparency.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C5 shows that for bottom dissolved oxygen concentrations: 86 % of the MRU (27422 km2 ) achieves good ecological status and 14 % of the MRU (4464 km2 ) is not assessed.
|
||
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
Integration rule type criteria |
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description criteria |
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
GES extent threshold |
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the large area of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 31886 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU has been assessed. The large area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the wider area.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the large area of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 31886 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU has been assessed. The large area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the wider area.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the large area of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 31886 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU has been assessed. The large area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the wider area.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the large area of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 31886 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU has been assessed. The large area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the wider area.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the large area of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 31886 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU has been assessed. The large area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the wider area.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the large area of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 31886 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU has been assessed. The large area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the wider area.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the large area of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 31886 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU has been assessed. The large area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the wider area.
|
Assessments period |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
Related pressures |
|||||||
Related targets |
ZC SRM MC (ACS-FR-MS-MC-MEC2016)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Nutrients (N, P) |
Chlorophyll-a |
Transparency |
Dissolved oxygen |
Opportunistic macro-algae |
Macrophyte communities |
Macrophyte communities |
Macrophyte communities |
Element code |
QE3-1-6 |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
QE3-1-1 |
EEA_3132-01-2 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2 |
QE1-2 |
QE1-2 |
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Element 2 |
||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
D5C6
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
D5C7
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Concentration in water
|
Other
|
Concentration in water
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Concentration of DIN in water
|
Turbidity of the water column
|
EQR - Intertidal/mediolittoral macroalgae
|
EQR - Meadows
|
EQR - Subtidal macroalgae
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
29.0 |
10.0 |
3.0 |
0.6 |
||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
The threshold used for the coastal water body is 10 NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Unit) for ecotypes 1 (rocky areas and Mediterranean coasts) and 45 NTU for ecotypes 3 (sandy/muddy areas and mouths of major rivers).
|
This parameter is based on the WFD (2000/60/EC) classification for the status of the quality element "intertidal hard substrate macroalgae" in each water body. It is achieved if the Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) is greater than 0,6
|
This parameter is based on the WFD (2000/60/EC) classification for the status of the quality element "angiosperms" in each water body. It is achieved when the Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) is greater than 0.6.
|
This parameter is based on the WFD (2000/60/EC) classification for the status of the quality element "subtidal macroalgae" in each water body. It is achieved when the Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) is greater than 0,65.
|
||||
Threshold value source |
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Threshold value source other |
||||||||
Value achieved upper |
37.9 |
4.1 |
5.6 |
8.1 |
1.0 |
|||
Value achieved lower |
16.9 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
5.7 |
0.2 |
|||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
Other
|
milligram per litre
|
Other
|
|||
Value unit other |
NTU
|
EQR
|
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
20.0 |
37.0 |
64.0 |
37.0 |
28.0 |
59.0 |
54.0 |
64.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
The indicator for this parameter makes it possible to assess good nutrient status (DIN and DIP) at the scale of each coastal water body or grid box (intermediate and wide areas). In the coastal zone: Only DINs are assessed and the parameter is based on in situ data collected through perennial monitoring networks. From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each coastal water body (WFD) and corresponds to the DIN concentration (nitrate + nitrite + ammonium) normalized to a salinity of 33 ‰ for the assessment period. The result of the calculation of the metric is then compared with a threshold value to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the coastal water body in question. 20% of the zone reaches the parameter, 17% does not (coastal water bodies concerned): Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel, Fond Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Paimpol - Perros-Guirec, Bay of Morlaix) and 63% is not assessed (no data acquisition in the framework of WFD monitoring). The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude on whether the parameter assessed at the MRU level has been reached or not.
|
Achievement of the "concentration in water" parameter for chlorophyll a is assessed at the scale of each coastal water body or grid box (intermediate and wide areas). In coastal areas: The indicator is based on in situ data collected through perennial monitoring networks. From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each coastal water body (WFD) and corresponds to the 90 percentile of surface chlorophyll-a concentrations for the assessment period. The result of the metric calculation is then compared with a threshold value to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the coastal water body in question. For example, for the chlorophyll a concentration in the coastal zone, 37% of the zone meets the parameter and 63% is not assessed. The absence of a threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition does not allow a conclusion to be drawn on whether or not the parameter assessed at the MRU level has been met.
|
The transparency of the water is assessed on the basis of its turbidity level. Achievement of the water column turbidity parameter is assessed at the scale of each coastal water mass or grid cell (intermediate and wide areas). In coastal areas: The indicator is based on in situ data collected through perennial monitoring networks. From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each coastal water mass (WFD) and corresponds to the 90 percentile of the turbidity of the water column for the assessment period. The result of the calculation of the metric is then compared with a threshold value to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the coastal water body in question. The assessment of the parameter for water column turbidity shows that 64% of the coastal zone reaches the parameter and 36% of the coastal zone could not be assessed. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude on whether the parameter assessed at the MRU level has been reached or not.
|
Achievement of the parameter relating to the "concentration in water" of dissolved oxygen at the bottom of the water column is assessed at the scale of each coastal water mass or grid cell (intermediate and wide areas). In coastal areas: The indicator is based on in situ data collected through perennial monitoring networks. From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each coastal water mass (WFD) and corresponds to the 10th percentile of dissolved oxygen concentrations at the bottom for the assessment period. The result of the calculation of the metric is then compared with a threshold value to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the coastal water mass in question. The assessment of the parameter relating to the bottom dissolved oxygen concentration shows that 37 % of the coastal zone reaches the parameter and 63 % could not be assessed. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not allow to conclude on whether the parameter assessed at the MRU level has been reached or not.
|
Achievement of the parameter relating to the abundance of opportunistic macro-algae is achieved at the scale of each coastal water body and results in an Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR). The evaluation of this parameter shows that: 28 % of the area reaches the parameter, 20 % does not reach the parameter and 52 % is not evaluated. The 4 coastal water masses that do not reach the parameter are Fond de Baie de Saint-Brieuc, Baie de Lannion, Léon - Trégor (large) and Baie de Douarnenez. The absence of a threshold for the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude whether or not the parameter assessed at the MRU level has been reached.
|
Achievement of the "Quality Index - Intertidal/mid-littoral macro-algae" parameter is achieved at the scale of each coastal water body and results in an Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR). The assessment of this parameter shows that: 59.5% of the area reaches the parameter, 32.5% is not assessed, and 8% is not relevant to be assessed for this parameter. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of MRU in good status does not allow to conclude on whether the parameter assessed at the scale of the MRU is reached or not.
|
Achievement of the parameter relating to the "Quality Index - Seagrasses" is carried out at the scale of each coastal water body and makes it possible to obtain an Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR). The evaluation of this parameter shows that 54% of the area reaches the parameter, 33% is not evaluated, and 13% is not relevant to evaluate for this parameter. The absence of a threshold for the percentage of MRU in good condition does not allow to conclude on whether or not the parameter evaluated at the scale of the MRU has been reached.
|
Achievement of the "Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae" parameter is achieved at the scale of each coastal water body and results in an Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR). The assessment of this parameter shows that 64% of the area achieves the parameter, 1% does not achieve the parameter, 32% is not assessed, and 3% is not relevant to assess for this parameter. The absence of a threshold for the percentage of MRU in good status does not allow to conclude on whether the parameter assessed at the MRU scale is achieved or not.
|
Related indicator |
||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
The assessment of criterion D5C1 shall be carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C1 is obtained directly from the assessment of the DIN concentration parameter (DIP concentrations are only determined in the intermediate and broad zones). If there is no threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C1 is therefore set to "unknown".
|
The assessment of criterion D5C2 shall be carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body for D5C2 is obtained directly from the assessment of the chlorophyll-a concentration parameter. If there is no threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C2 is therefore set to "unknown".
|
The assessment of criterion D5C4 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C4 is obtained directly from the assessment of the water transparency parameter . If there is no threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C4 is therefore set to "unknown".
|
The assessment of criterion D5C5 shall be carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C5 is obtained directly from the assessment of the dissolved oxygen concentration parameter. If there is no threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C5 is therefore set to "unknown".
|
The assessment of criterion D5C6 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C6 is obtained directly from the assessment of the parameter relating to the abundance of opportunistic macroalgae . In the absence of a threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C6 is therefore set to "unknown".
|
The assessment of the D5C7 is based on a combination of several indicators used in the framework of the WFD. These WFD indicators are made up of a number of metrics allowing the calculation of an Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR). The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is finally obtained by considering only the assessment of the parameter ("Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae", "Quality Index - Intertidal/Midolittoral Macroalgae" and "Quality Index - Seagrasses") with the most declining status of the coastal water body (integration of the "One Out, All Out" type). If there is no threshold for the percentage of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C7 is set to "unknown".
|
The assessment of the D5C7 is based on a combination of several indicators used in the framework of the WFD. These WFD indicators are made up of a number of metrics allowing the calculation of an Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR). The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is finally obtained by considering only the assessment of the parameter ("Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae", "Quality Index - Intertidal/Midolittoral Macroalgae" and "Quality Index - Seagrasses") with the most declining status of the coastal water body (integration of the "One Out, All Out" type). If there is no threshold for the percentage of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C7 is set to "unknown".
|
The assessment of the D5C7 is based on a combination of several indicators used in the framework of the WFD. These WFD indicators are made up of a number of metrics allowing the calculation of an Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR). The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is finally obtained by considering only the assessment of the parameter ("Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae", "Quality Index - Intertidal/Midolittoral Macroalgae" and "Quality Index - Seagrasses") with the most declining status of the coastal water body (integration of the "One Out, All Out" type). If there is no threshold for the percentage of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C7 is set to "unknown".
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
The assessment of criterion D5C1 shows that for DIN concentrations: 17 % of the MRU (812 km2 ) does not achieve good ecological status, 20 % of the MRU (974 km2 ) achieves good ecological status, and 63 % of the MRU (3087 km2 ) is not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C2 shows that for chlorophyll-a concentrations 37 % of the MRU (1786 km2 ) achieves good ecological status and 63 % of the MRU (3087 km2 ) is not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C4 shows that for turbidity 64 % of the MRU (3106 km2 ) achieves good ecological status and 36 % of the MRU (1767 km2 ) is not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C5 shows that for bottom dissolved oxygen concentrations: 37 % of the MRU (1786 km2 ) achieves good ecological status and 63 % of the MRU (3087 km2 ) is not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C6 shows that for the abundance of opportunistic macroalgae: 20 % of the MRU (i.e. 982 km2 ) does not achieve good ecological status, 28 % of the MRU (i.e. 1342 km2 ) achieves good ecological status and 52 % of the MRU (i.e. 2550 km2 ) is not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C7 shows that for the abundance of perennial macro-algae and sea grass: 1 % of the MRU (i.e. 38 km2 ) does not achieve good ecological status, 64 % of the MRU (i.e. 3126 km2 ) achieves good ecological status, 3 % of the MRU (i.e. 128 km2 ) is not relevant for this criterion, and 32 % of the MRU (i.e. 1581 km2 ) is not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C7 shows that for the abundance of perennial macro-algae and sea grass: 1 % of the MRU (i.e. 38 km2 ) does not achieve good ecological status, 64 % of the MRU (i.e. 3126 km2 ) achieves good ecological status, 3 % of the MRU (i.e. 128 km2 ) is not relevant for this criterion, and 32 % of the MRU (i.e. 1581 km2 ) is not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C7 shows that for the abundance of perennial macro-algae and sea grass: 1 % of the MRU (i.e. 38 km2 ) does not achieve good ecological status, 64 % of the MRU (i.e. 3126 km2 ) achieves good ecological status, 3 % of the MRU (i.e. 128 km2 ) is not relevant for this criterion, and 32 % of the MRU (i.e. 1581 km2 ) is not assessed.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration between the three parameters "Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae", "Quality Index - Intertidal/Middle-littoral Macroalgae" and "Quality Index - Herbarium". For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration between the three parameters "Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae", "Quality Index - Intertidal/Middle-littoral Macroalgae" and "Quality Index - Herbarium". For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration between the three parameters "Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae", "Quality Index - Intertidal/Middle-littoral Macroalgae" and "Quality Index - Herbarium". For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration between the three parameters "Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae", "Quality Index - Intertidal/Middle-littoral Macroalgae" and "Quality Index - Herbarium". For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration between the three parameters "Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae", "Quality Index - Intertidal/Middle-littoral Macroalgae" and "Quality Index - Herbarium". For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration between the three parameters "Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae", "Quality Index - Intertidal/Middle-littoral Macroalgae" and "Quality Index - Herbarium". For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration between the three parameters "Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae", "Quality Index - Intertidal/Middle-littoral Macroalgae" and "Quality Index - Herbarium". For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration between the three parameters "Quality Index - Subtidal Macroalgae", "Quality Index - Intertidal/Middle-littoral Macroalgae" and "Quality Index - Herbarium". For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
Integration rule type criteria |
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description criteria |
At the level of each coastal water body (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of criteria is carried out in two stages:1/ The first stage consists in assigning a mark for each criterion as to whether or not good status has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the good condition is reached receives a score of 0, a criterion for which the good condition is not reached receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be assigned as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, for each coastal water body, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 5, then the coastal water body in question is not in good condition. Note that if good status is not achieved for criterion D5C6, then the coastal water body in question is systematically downgraded.
|
At the level of each coastal water body (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of criteria is carried out in two stages:1/ The first stage consists in assigning a mark for each criterion as to whether or not good status has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the good condition is reached receives a score of 0, a criterion for which the good condition is not reached receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be assigned as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, for each coastal water body, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 5, then the coastal water body in question is not in good condition. Note that if good status is not achieved for criterion D5C6, then the coastal water body in question is systematically downgraded.
|
At the level of each coastal water body (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of criteria is carried out in two stages:1/ The first stage consists in assigning a mark for each criterion as to whether or not good status has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the good condition is reached receives a score of 0, a criterion for which the good condition is not reached receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be assigned as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, for each coastal water body, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 5, then the coastal water body in question is not in good condition. Note that if good status is not achieved for criterion D5C6, then the coastal water body in question is systematically downgraded.
|
At the level of each coastal water body (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of criteria is carried out in two stages:1/ The first stage consists in assigning a mark for each criterion as to whether or not good status has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the good condition is reached receives a score of 0, a criterion for which the good condition is not reached receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be assigned as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, for each coastal water body, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 5, then the coastal water body in question is not in good condition. Note that if good status is not achieved for criterion D5C6, then the coastal water body in question is systematically downgraded.
|
At the level of each coastal water body (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of criteria is carried out in two stages:1/ The first stage consists in assigning a mark for each criterion as to whether or not good status has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the good condition is reached receives a score of 0, a criterion for which the good condition is not reached receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be assigned as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, for each coastal water body, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 5, then the coastal water body in question is not in good condition. Note that if good status is not achieved for criterion D5C6, then the coastal water body in question is systematically downgraded.
|
At the level of each coastal water body (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of criteria is carried out in two stages:1/ The first stage consists in assigning a mark for each criterion as to whether or not good status has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the good condition is reached receives a score of 0, a criterion for which the good condition is not reached receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be assigned as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, for each coastal water body, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 5, then the coastal water body in question is not in good condition. Note that if good status is not achieved for criterion D5C6, then the coastal water body in question is systematically downgraded.
|
At the level of each coastal water body (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of criteria is carried out in two stages:1/ The first stage consists in assigning a mark for each criterion as to whether or not good status has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the good condition is reached receives a score of 0, a criterion for which the good condition is not reached receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be assigned as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, for each coastal water body, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 5, then the coastal water body in question is not in good condition. Note that if good status is not achieved for criterion D5C6, then the coastal water body in question is systematically downgraded.
|
At the level of each coastal water body (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of criteria is carried out in two stages:1/ The first stage consists in assigning a mark for each criterion as to whether or not good status has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the good condition is reached receives a score of 0, a criterion for which the good condition is not reached receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be assigned as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, for each coastal water body, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 5, then the coastal water body in question is not in good condition. Note that if good status is not achieved for criterion D5C6, then the coastal water body in question is systematically downgraded.
|
GES extent threshold |
||||||||
GES extent achieved |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
72.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
The achievement of good ecological status for descriptor 5 is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 6 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as water column transparency, opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities. In this MRU, relating to the coastal zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 72% (i.e. 3518 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. On the other hand, 20% (982 km2 ) of the area of the MRU does not achieve good status and 8% (373 km2 ) of the area has not been assessed. On reading the results by criterion, it appears that the eutrophication problems in this MRU are manifested in the coastal water bodies by strandings of opportunistic algae of the Ulva genus. Moreover, the results show that the nutrient concentrations (nitrates) lead to the failure to achieve good status for some coastal water bodies located in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel, Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Paimpol - Perros-Guirec and the Bay of Morlaix. However, the coastal water bodies where opportunistic algae proliferate are not in poor condition for the nutrient criterion: the link between nutrient inputs (particularly nitrates) and the development of opportunistic algae is therefore not directly visible through the MSFD assessment. Indeed, opportunistic algal blooms do not only depend on the parameters directly taken into account by the MSFD assessment of descriptor 5 - other parameters such as hydrodynamics (residual currents, tidal currents, stratification of the water column, tidal range), salinity, temperature, or the nature of the marine sediment (which more or less favours the remineralisation process of detrital organic matter), can influence the eutrophication process of water bodies. Furthermore, this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). A clear improvement of the assessment methodology can also be noted compared to the Initial Assessment of 2012.
|
The achievement of good ecological status for descriptor 5 is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 6 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as water column transparency, opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities. In this MRU, relating to the coastal zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 72% (i.e. 3518 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. On the other hand, 20% (982 km2 ) of the area of the MRU does not achieve good status and 8% (373 km2 ) of the area has not been assessed. On reading the results by criterion, it appears that the eutrophication problems in this MRU are manifested in the coastal water bodies by strandings of opportunistic algae of the Ulva genus. Moreover, the results show that the nutrient concentrations (nitrates) lead to the failure to achieve good status for some coastal water bodies located in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel, Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Paimpol - Perros-Guirec and the Bay of Morlaix. However, the coastal water bodies where opportunistic algae proliferate are not in poor condition for the nutrient criterion: the link between nutrient inputs (particularly nitrates) and the development of opportunistic algae is therefore not directly visible through the MSFD assessment. Indeed, opportunistic algal blooms do not only depend on the parameters directly taken into account by the MSFD assessment of descriptor 5 - other parameters such as hydrodynamics (residual currents, tidal currents, stratification of the water column, tidal range), salinity, temperature, or the nature of the marine sediment (which more or less favours the remineralisation process of detrital organic matter), can influence the eutrophication process of water bodies. Furthermore, this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). A clear improvement of the assessment methodology can also be noted compared to the Initial Assessment of 2012.
|
The achievement of good ecological status for descriptor 5 is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 6 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as water column transparency, opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities. In this MRU, relating to the coastal zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 72% (i.e. 3518 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. On the other hand, 20% (982 km2 ) of the area of the MRU does not achieve good status and 8% (373 km2 ) of the area has not been assessed. On reading the results by criterion, it appears that the eutrophication problems in this MRU are manifested in the coastal water bodies by strandings of opportunistic algae of the Ulva genus. Moreover, the results show that the nutrient concentrations (nitrates) lead to the failure to achieve good status for some coastal water bodies located in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel, Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Paimpol - Perros-Guirec and the Bay of Morlaix. However, the coastal water bodies where opportunistic algae proliferate are not in poor condition for the nutrient criterion: the link between nutrient inputs (particularly nitrates) and the development of opportunistic algae is therefore not directly visible through the MSFD assessment. Indeed, opportunistic algal blooms do not only depend on the parameters directly taken into account by the MSFD assessment of descriptor 5 - other parameters such as hydrodynamics (residual currents, tidal currents, stratification of the water column, tidal range), salinity, temperature, or the nature of the marine sediment (which more or less favours the remineralisation process of detrital organic matter), can influence the eutrophication process of water bodies. Furthermore, this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). A clear improvement of the assessment methodology can also be noted compared to the Initial Assessment of 2012.
|
The achievement of good ecological status for descriptor 5 is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 6 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as water column transparency, opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities. In this MRU, relating to the coastal zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 72% (i.e. 3518 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. On the other hand, 20% (982 km2 ) of the area of the MRU does not achieve good status and 8% (373 km2 ) of the area has not been assessed. On reading the results by criterion, it appears that the eutrophication problems in this MRU are manifested in the coastal water bodies by strandings of opportunistic algae of the Ulva genus. Moreover, the results show that the nutrient concentrations (nitrates) lead to the failure to achieve good status for some coastal water bodies located in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel, Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Paimpol - Perros-Guirec and the Bay of Morlaix. However, the coastal water bodies where opportunistic algae proliferate are not in poor condition for the nutrient criterion: the link between nutrient inputs (particularly nitrates) and the development of opportunistic algae is therefore not directly visible through the MSFD assessment. Indeed, opportunistic algal blooms do not only depend on the parameters directly taken into account by the MSFD assessment of descriptor 5 - other parameters such as hydrodynamics (residual currents, tidal currents, stratification of the water column, tidal range), salinity, temperature, or the nature of the marine sediment (which more or less favours the remineralisation process of detrital organic matter), can influence the eutrophication process of water bodies. Furthermore, this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). A clear improvement of the assessment methodology can also be noted compared to the Initial Assessment of 2012.
|
The achievement of good ecological status for descriptor 5 is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 6 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as water column transparency, opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities. In this MRU, relating to the coastal zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 72% (i.e. 3518 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. On the other hand, 20% (982 km2 ) of the area of the MRU does not achieve good status and 8% (373 km2 ) of the area has not been assessed. On reading the results by criterion, it appears that the eutrophication problems in this MRU are manifested in the coastal water bodies by strandings of opportunistic algae of the Ulva genus. Moreover, the results show that the nutrient concentrations (nitrates) lead to the failure to achieve good status for some coastal water bodies located in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel, Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Paimpol - Perros-Guirec and the Bay of Morlaix. However, the coastal water bodies where opportunistic algae proliferate are not in poor condition for the nutrient criterion: the link between nutrient inputs (particularly nitrates) and the development of opportunistic algae is therefore not directly visible through the MSFD assessment. Indeed, opportunistic algal blooms do not only depend on the parameters directly taken into account by the MSFD assessment of descriptor 5 - other parameters such as hydrodynamics (residual currents, tidal currents, stratification of the water column, tidal range), salinity, temperature, or the nature of the marine sediment (which more or less favours the remineralisation process of detrital organic matter), can influence the eutrophication process of water bodies. Furthermore, this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). A clear improvement of the assessment methodology can also be noted compared to the Initial Assessment of 2012.
|
The achievement of good ecological status for descriptor 5 is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 6 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as water column transparency, opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities. In this MRU, relating to the coastal zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 72% (i.e. 3518 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. On the other hand, 20% (982 km2 ) of the area of the MRU does not achieve good status and 8% (373 km2 ) of the area has not been assessed. On reading the results by criterion, it appears that the eutrophication problems in this MRU are manifested in the coastal water bodies by strandings of opportunistic algae of the Ulva genus. Moreover, the results show that the nutrient concentrations (nitrates) lead to the failure to achieve good status for some coastal water bodies located in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel, Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Paimpol - Perros-Guirec and the Bay of Morlaix. However, the coastal water bodies where opportunistic algae proliferate are not in poor condition for the nutrient criterion: the link between nutrient inputs (particularly nitrates) and the development of opportunistic algae is therefore not directly visible through the MSFD assessment. Indeed, opportunistic algal blooms do not only depend on the parameters directly taken into account by the MSFD assessment of descriptor 5 - other parameters such as hydrodynamics (residual currents, tidal currents, stratification of the water column, tidal range), salinity, temperature, or the nature of the marine sediment (which more or less favours the remineralisation process of detrital organic matter), can influence the eutrophication process of water bodies. Furthermore, this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). A clear improvement of the assessment methodology can also be noted compared to the Initial Assessment of 2012.
|
The achievement of good ecological status for descriptor 5 is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 6 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as water column transparency, opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities. In this MRU, relating to the coastal zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 72% (i.e. 3518 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. On the other hand, 20% (982 km2 ) of the area of the MRU does not achieve good status and 8% (373 km2 ) of the area has not been assessed. On reading the results by criterion, it appears that the eutrophication problems in this MRU are manifested in the coastal water bodies by strandings of opportunistic algae of the Ulva genus. Moreover, the results show that the nutrient concentrations (nitrates) lead to the failure to achieve good status for some coastal water bodies located in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel, Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Paimpol - Perros-Guirec and the Bay of Morlaix. However, the coastal water bodies where opportunistic algae proliferate are not in poor condition for the nutrient criterion: the link between nutrient inputs (particularly nitrates) and the development of opportunistic algae is therefore not directly visible through the MSFD assessment. Indeed, opportunistic algal blooms do not only depend on the parameters directly taken into account by the MSFD assessment of descriptor 5 - other parameters such as hydrodynamics (residual currents, tidal currents, stratification of the water column, tidal range), salinity, temperature, or the nature of the marine sediment (which more or less favours the remineralisation process of detrital organic matter), can influence the eutrophication process of water bodies. Furthermore, this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). A clear improvement of the assessment methodology can also be noted compared to the Initial Assessment of 2012.
|
The achievement of good ecological status for descriptor 5 is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 6 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as water column transparency, opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities. In this MRU, relating to the coastal zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 72% (i.e. 3518 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. On the other hand, 20% (982 km2 ) of the area of the MRU does not achieve good status and 8% (373 km2 ) of the area has not been assessed. On reading the results by criterion, it appears that the eutrophication problems in this MRU are manifested in the coastal water bodies by strandings of opportunistic algae of the Ulva genus. Moreover, the results show that the nutrient concentrations (nitrates) lead to the failure to achieve good status for some coastal water bodies located in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel, Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Paimpol - Perros-Guirec and the Bay of Morlaix. However, the coastal water bodies where opportunistic algae proliferate are not in poor condition for the nutrient criterion: the link between nutrient inputs (particularly nitrates) and the development of opportunistic algae is therefore not directly visible through the MSFD assessment. Indeed, opportunistic algal blooms do not only depend on the parameters directly taken into account by the MSFD assessment of descriptor 5 - other parameters such as hydrodynamics (residual currents, tidal currents, stratification of the water column, tidal range), salinity, temperature, or the nature of the marine sediment (which more or less favours the remineralisation process of detrital organic matter), can influence the eutrophication process of water bodies. Furthermore, this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). A clear improvement of the assessment methodology can also be noted compared to the Initial Assessment of 2012.
|
Assessments period |
2010-2015 |
2010-2015 |
2010-2015 |
2010-2015 |
2010-2015 |
2010-2015 |
2010-2015 |
2010-2015 |
Related pressures |
||||||||
Related targets |
ZI SRM MC (ACS-FR-MS-MC-ZI)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Nutrients (N, P) |
Nutrients (N, P) |
Chlorophyll-a |
Transparency |
Dissolved oxygen |
Opportunistic macro-algae |
Macrophyte communities |
Element code |
QE3-1-6 |
QE3-1-6 |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
QE3-1-1 |
EEA_3132-01-2 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-2 |
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Element 2 |
|||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
D5C6
|
D5C7
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Concentration in water
|
Other
|
Concentration in water
|
||
Parameter other |
Concentration of DIN in water
|
Concentration of DIP in water
|
Turbidity of the water column
|
||||
Threshold value upper |
24.65 |
0.8 |
5.0 |
7.0 |
3.0 |
||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
8.2 |
0.58 |
1.67 |
1.55 |
7.47 |
||
Value achieved lower |
5.9 |
0.43 |
0.71 |
0.47 |
6.7 |
||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
Other
|
milligram per litre
|
||
Value unit other |
NTU
|
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||
Description parameter |
The indicator for this parameter makes it possible to assess good nutrient status (DIN and DIP) at the scale of each coastal water body or grid box (intermediate and wide areas). In intermediate and wide areas: the parameter relating to "DIN concentration in water" is based on data from the hydrodynamic and biological model ECO-MARS3D (https://wwz.ifremer.fr/mars3d/). From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each grid cell and corresponds to the median nitrate and DIP (phosphate) concentration for the evaluation period. The result of the metric calculation is then compared with the threshold values to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the grid cell in question. For the intermediate zone for DINs, 100% of the zone reaches the parameter. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude whether or not the parameter evaluated at the MRU level has been reached.
|
The indicator for this parameter makes it possible to assess good nutrient status (DIN and DIP) at the scale of each coastal water body or grid box (intermediate and wide areas). In intermediate and wide areas: the parameter relating to "DIP concentration" is based on data from the hydrodynamic and biological model ECO-MARS3D (https://wwz.ifremer.fr/mars3d/). From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each grid cell and corresponds to the median nitrate and DIP (phosphate) concentration for the evaluation period. The result of the metric calculation is then compared with the threshold values to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the grid cell in question. For the intermediate zone for DIP, 100% of the intermediate zone reaches the parameter. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude whether or not the parameter evaluated at the MRU level has been reached.
|
In intermediate and wide areas, the parameter "concentration in water" of chlorophyll-a is based on data from satellite images (MODIS sensor). From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each grid cell and corresponds to the 90 percentile of surface chlorophyll-a concentrations for the assessment period. The result of the calculation of the metric is then compared with the threshold values to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the grid cell in question. Thus, the concentrations of chlrophylla-a in the intermediate zone show that 100% of the zone reaches the parameter. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude whether the parameter evaluated at the MRU level has been reached.
|
In intermediate and wide areas, the turbidity parameter in the water column is based on data from satellite images (MODIS sensor). From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each grid cell and corresponds to the 90 percentile of the transparency of the water column for the evaluation period. The result of the metric calculation is then compared with the threshold values to determine whether or not the parameter has been reached in the grid box in question. Thus, the evaluation of the parameter relating to the turbidity of the water column shows that 100% of the intermediate zone reaches the parameter. The absence of a threshold at the level of the percentage of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude whether the parameter evaluated at the MRU level has been reached.
|
In intermediate and wide areas, the parameter "dissolved oxygen concentration at the bottom" is based on data from the hydrodynamic and biological model ECO-MARS3D (https://wwz.ifremer.fr/mars3d/). From these data, a metric is defined at the scale of each grid cell and corresponds to the 10th percentile of the bottom dissolved oxygen concentrations for the assessment period. Thus, the evaluation of the parameter relating to the bottom dissolved oxygen concentration shows that 100% of the intermediate zone reaches the parameter. The absence of a threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition does not make it possible to conclude whether the parameter assessed at the MRU level has been reached.
|
||
Related indicator |
|||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
The evaluation of criterion D5C1 shall be carried out at the scale of each grid box considered individually. The D5C1 status of each grid cell shall be obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration of the parameters for DIn and DIP concentrations. In the absence of a threshold for the percentage of the MRU in good condition, the status of the D5C1 criterion is therefore indicated as "unknown".
|
The evaluation of criterion D5C1 shall be carried out at the scale of each grid box considered individually. The D5C1 status of each grid cell shall be obtained by a "One Out, All Out" integration of the parameters for DIn and DIP concentrations. In the absence of a threshold for the percentage of the MRU in good condition, the status of the D5C1 criterion is therefore indicated as "unknown".
|
The evaluation of criterion D5C2 shall be carried out at the scale of each grid box considered individually. The D5C2 status of each grid cell is obtained directly from the assessment of the chlorophyll-a concentration parameter. If there is no threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C2 is therefore set to "unknown".
|
The evaluation of criterion D5C4 shall be carried out at the scale of each grid box considered individually. The status of each grid cell under D5C4 is obtained directly by evaluating the water transparency parameter . If there is no threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C4 is therefore set to "unknown".
|
The evaluation of criterion D5C5 shall be carried out at the scale of each grid box considered individually. The status of each cell under D5C5 is obtained directly by evaluating the parameter relating to the dissolved oxygen concentration. If there is no threshold at the percentage level of the MRU in good condition, the status of criterion D5C5 is therefore set to "unknown".
|
Criterion D5C6 is "Not relevant" in this MRU, relating to the intermediate zone of the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region, as it is assessed only in the coastal zone. Indeed, opportunistic algal blooms are only expressed at the coastal level of French waters, via stranding phenomena.
|
Criterion D5C7 is "Not relevant" in this MRU, relating to the intermediate zone of the Celtic Seas Marine Sub-Region, as it is assessed only in the coastal zone. This is because perennial meadows and macroalgae do not grow below a certain depth (need for light), and because the depth is generally proportional to the distance from the coast, most of these meadows and macroalgae populations are mostly located in the coastal zone.
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
The assessment of criterion D5C1 shows that for DIN and DIP concentrations, 100 % of the MRU (i.e. 6705 km2 ) achieves good ecological status.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C1 shows that for DIN and DIP concentrations, 100 % of the MRU (i.e. 6705 km2 ) achieves good ecological status.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C2 shows that for chlorophyll-a concentrations, 100 % of the MRU (i.e. 6705 km2 ) achieves good ecological status.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C4 shows that for turbidity, 100 % of the MRU (i.e. 6705 km2 ) achieves good ecological status.
|
The assessment of criterion D5C5 shows that for the bottom dissolved oxygen concentration, 100 % of the RMU (i.e. 6705 km2 ) achieves good ecological status.
|
||
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
|
Integration rule type criteria |
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
HIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description criteria |
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
|
GES extent threshold |
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the intermediate zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 6705 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU could also be assessed. The intermediate area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the intermediate zone.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the intermediate zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 6705 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU could also be assessed. The intermediate area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the intermediate zone.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the intermediate zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 6705 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU could also be assessed. The intermediate area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the intermediate zone.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the intermediate zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 6705 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU could also be assessed. The intermediate area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the intermediate zone.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the intermediate zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 6705 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU could also be assessed. The intermediate area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the intermediate zone.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the intermediate zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 6705 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU could also be assessed. The intermediate area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the intermediate zone.
|
Achievement of good ecological status is quantitatively assessed on the basis of 4 criteria relating to the concentration of nutrients, chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen, as well as the transparency of the water column. The criteria relating to opportunistic macro-algae and macrophyte communities are not relevant to be assessed in this MRU. In this MRU, relating to the intermediate zone of the Celtic Seas marine sub-region, the results of the integration of all the criteria show that 100% (i.e. 6705 km2 ) of the area achieves good status. It should be noted that 100% of the area of this MRU could also be assessed. The intermediate area does not therefore appear to be affected by eutrophication phenomena, and this assessment has been the subject of collaboration at both national and European level (adaptation of the methodologies of the joint OSPAR-COMP3 procedure). There has also been a marked improvement in the assessment methodology compared with the 2012 Initial Assessment, with the use of products from satellite images and modelling, as well as proposals for thresholds for the intermediate zone.
|
Assessments period |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
Related pressures |
|||||||
Related targets |