Member State report / Art10 / 2018 / D5 / France / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D5 Eutrophication |
Member State | France |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire |
Report date | 2020-02-19 |
Report access | ART10_TARGETS_FR_2019-12-12.xml |
Target code |
D05-OE01 |
D05-OE01 |
D05-OE01 |
D05-OE02 |
D05-OE02 |
D05-OE02 |
D05-OE03 |
D05-OE04 |
OE_ATL_ope_D5.1 |
OE_ATL_ope_D5.2 |
OE_ATL_ope_D5.3 |
OE_ATL_ope_D5.4 |
OE_MMN_gen_D5.1 |
OE_MMN_gen_D5.2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target description |
Reduce nutrient inputs (nitrates and phosphates) especially from rivers flowing into eutrophicated marine areas. Environmental objective applying to all the Eastern Channel, North Atlantic, Western Channel and South Atlantic coasts, but targeting in particular: - Eastern Channel North Sea: Picardy estuaries (Authie, Liane, Wimereux, Slack), Seine estuary, West Nacre Coast, East Nacre Coast and Barfleur at the eastern tip of the Cotentin peninsula - North Atlantic and Western Channel: Bottom of the Bay of Saint Brieuc, Bay of Lannion, Côte d'Armor (West zone), Léon-Trégor (wide), Bay of Douarnenez, Bay of Concarneau, Laïta large, Gulf of Morbihan, mouth of the Loire - South Atlantic: Mouth of the Gironde
|
Reduce nutrient inputs (nitrates and phosphates) especially from rivers flowing into eutrophicated marine areas. Environmental objective applying to all the Eastern Channel, North Atlantic, Western Channel and South Atlantic coasts, but targeting in particular: - Eastern Channel North Sea: Picardy estuaries (Authie, Liane, Wimereux, Slack), Seine estuary, West Nacre Coast, East Nacre Coast and Barfleur at the eastern tip of the Cotentin peninsula - North Atlantic and Western Channel: Bottom of the Bay of Saint Brieuc, Bay of Lannion, Côte d'Armor (West zone), Léon-Trégor (wide), Bay of Douarnenez, Bay of Concarneau, Laïta large, Gulf of Morbihan, mouth of the Loire - South Atlantic: Mouth of the Gironde
|
Reduce nutrient inputs (nitrates and phosphates) especially from rivers flowing into eutrophicated marine areas. Environmental objective applying to all the Eastern Channel, North Atlantic, Western Channel and South Atlantic coasts, but targeting in particular: - Eastern Channel North Sea: Picardy estuaries (Authie, Liane, Wimereux, Slack), Seine estuary, West Nacre Coast, East Nacre Coast and Barfleur at the eastern tip of the Cotentin peninsula - North Atlantic and Western Channel: Bottom of the Bay of Saint Brieuc, Bay of Lannion, Côte d'Armor (West zone), Léon-Trégor (wide), Bay of Douarnenez, Bay of Concarneau, Laïta large, Gulf of Morbihan, mouth of the Loire - South Atlantic: Mouth of the Gironde
|
Reduce nutrient inputs (nitrates and phosphates), in particular from small coastal rivers, leading to sensitive marine areas due to their containment or presence of sensitive habitats * to these inputs
* habitats susceptible to eutrophication in the English Channel and Atlantic: Maerl beds, soil bioconstructions, seagrass beds and salt meadows
EO applying to all MEMN, NAMO, SA façades, but targeting in particular:
â MEMN: Estuaries (Authors, Liane, Wimereux, Slack), North -Breton Gulf (Siena, Baie du Mont Saint Michel)
â NAMO: Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Fresnaye Bay, Lannion Bay, Baie de Morlaix, Baie de Douarnenez, Baie de Vilaine and Baie de Bourgnuf, Rade de Brest, Gulf of Morbihan
â SA: Catchment area of Arcachon (Leyre), Pertuis (Lay, Sèvre nortaise, Seudre, Charente-Buton), Bidassoa, Adour
|
Reduce nutrient inputs (nitrates and phosphates), in particular from small coastal rivers, leading to sensitive marine areas due to their containment or presence of sensitive habitats * to these inputs
* habitats susceptible to eutrophication in the English Channel and Atlantic: Maerl beds, soil bioconstructions, seagrass beds and salt meadows
EO applying to all MEMN, NAMO, SA façades, but targeting in particular:
â MEMN: Estuaries (Authors, Liane, Wimereux, Slack), North -Breton Gulf (Siena, Baie du Mont Saint Michel)
â NAMO: Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Fresnaye Bay, Lannion Bay, Baie de Morlaix, Baie de Douarnenez, Baie de Vilaine and Baie de Bourgnuf, Rade de Brest, Gulf of Morbihan
â SA: Catchment area of Arcachon (Leyre), Pertuis (Lay, Sèvre nortaise, Seudre, Charente-Buton), Bidassoa, Adour
|
Reduce nutrient inputs (nitrates and phosphates), in particular from small coastal rivers, leading to sensitive marine areas due to their containment or presence of sensitive habitats * to these inputs
* habitats susceptible to eutrophication in the English Channel and Atlantic: Maerl beds, soil bioconstructions, seagrass beds and salt meadows
EO applying to all MEMN, NAMO, SA façades, but targeting in particular:
â MEMN: Estuaries (Authors, Liane, Wimereux, Slack), North -Breton Gulf (Siena, Baie du Mont Saint Michel)
â NAMO: Bay of Saint-Brieuc, Fresnaye Bay, Lannion Bay, Baie de Morlaix, Baie de Douarnenez, Baie de Vilaine and Baie de Bourgnuf, Rade de Brest, Gulf of Morbihan
â SA: Catchment area of Arcachon (Leyre), Pertuis (Lay, Sèvre nortaise, Seudre, Charente-Buton), Bidassoa, Adour
|
Do not increase nutrient inputs to areas with little or no impact from eutrophication
|
Reduce inputs of atmospheric nitrogen (Nox) at the national level
|
To preserve areas with little or no impact from eutrophication by limiting land-based nutrient inputs at source and during their transfer in the catchment areas concerned.
|
To identify areas of known eutrophication and the catchment areas that contribute most to the main nutrient inputs from the source to the outflow.
|
Reducing or eliminating nutrient inputs, with priority to the highest contributing watersheds, by addressing on-farm, urban and industrial emissions and nutrient transfer.
|
Reduce atmospheric nitrogen (Nox) inputs by taking into account the challenges of the marine environment in air pollution control plans, regional climate, air and energy plans and the Air Protection Plans of the most heavily contributing regions.
|
Preserve areas with little or no impact from eutrophication
|
Significantly reduce excessive nutrient inputs to the marine environment
|
Feature(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timescale |
202612 |
202612 |
202612 |
202612 |
202612 |
202612 |
202612 |
202612 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
201812 |
201812 |
Update date |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
201909 |
Update type |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Marine reporting unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
Nutrients |
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Other
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
|
Parameter - other |
Proportion
|
Ratio
|
Ratio
|
Proportion
|
Ratio
|
Ratio
|
Apports d'azote atmosphérique (Nox)
|
|||||||
Target value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||||||||||||
Value achieved - upper |
||||||||||||||
Value achieved - lower |
||||||||||||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
||||||||||||
Value unit - other |
||||||||||||||
Target status |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
|||||||
Assessment period |
2015-2021 |
2015-2021 |
2015-2021 |
2015-2021 |
2015-2021 |
2015-2021 |
2015-2021 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
|
Target assessment description |
target: 100
|
target: Defined, concerted and adopted at the same time as the action plan of the facade strategic document. Proportion (% to be defined) of rivers in the sub-sea region with nitrate concentrations (mg/L) compatible with the GES threshold values for the nutrient criterion (mainly with respect to the Chlorophyll-a criterion) At river level, nitrate concentrations (mg/L) compatible with the GES threshold values for the nutrient criterion (mainly with respect to the Chlorophyll-a criterion).
|
target: Defined, concerted and adopted at the same time as the action plan of the facade strategic document. Proportion (% to be defined) of rivers in the sub-region under consideration whose phosphate concentrations (mg/L) are compatible with the GES threshold values for the nutrient criterion (mainly with respect to the Chlorophyll-a criterion) At river level, phosphate concentrations (mg/L) compatible with the GES threshold values for the nutrient criterion (mainly with respect to the Chlorophyll-a criterion).
|
target: Defined, concerted and adopted at the same time as the action plan of the facade strategic document. Proportion (% to be defined) of rivers in the sub-sea region with nitrate concentrations (mg/L) compatible with the GES threshold values for the nutrient criterion (mainly with respect to the Chlorophyll-a criterion) At river level, nitrate concentrations (mg/L) compatible with the GES threshold values for the nutrient criterion (mainly with respect to the Chlorophyll-a criterion).
|
target: Defined, concerted and adopted at the same time as the action plan of the facade strategic document. Proportion (% to be defined) of rivers in the sub-region under consideration whose phosphate concentrations (mg/L) are compatible with the GES threshold values for the nutrient criterion (mainly with respect to the Chlorophyll-a criterion) At river level, phosphate concentrations (mg/L) compatible with the GES threshold values for the nutrient criterion (mainly with respect to the Chlorophyll-a criterion).
|
target: 100
|
Target: No increase in concentration levels from those calculated in the previous period under the WFD Safeguard plan
|
The environmental objective is dropped as it does not correspond to the definition of a second cycle environmental objective. Indeed, it is not intended to reduce a well-identified pressure. It is replaced in the second cycle by environmental objectives D05-OE01, D05-OE02 and D05-OE03.
|
The environmental objective is dropped as it does not correspond to the definition of a second cycle environmental objective. Indeed, it does not aim to reduce a well-identified pressure.
|
The environmental objective is dropped as it does not correspond to the definition of a second cycle environmental objective. Indeed, it does not aim to reduce a well-identified pressure.
|
The environmental objective is dropped as it does not correspond to the definition of a second cycle environmental objective. Indeed, it is not intended to reduce a well-identified pressure. It is replaced in the second cycle by the environmental objective D05-OE04.
|
The environmental objective is abandoned as it does not correspond to the definition of an environmental target for the second cycle. It is too general, it is not intended to reduce a clearly identified pressure and does not have an indicator enabling it to be assessed.
|
The environmental objective is abandoned as it does not correspond to the definition of an environmental target for the second cycle. It is too general, it is not intended to reduce a clearly identified pressure and does not have an indicator enabling it to be assessed.
|
|
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||
Related measures |
|
|
|
|