MS/Art8/2018/D1-B/France/Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea

Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-B / France / Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due	2018-10-15
GES Descriptor	D1 Birds
Member State	France
Region/subregion	Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea
Reported by	Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire
Report date	2020-02-19
Report access	ART8_GES_FR_2020-02-17.xml

SRM MO (MWE-FR-MS-MO)

Simplified table

GES component	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B
Feature	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds
Element	Morus bassanus	Morus bassanus	Morus bassanus	Morus bassanus	Morus bassanus	Phalacrocorax aristotelis	Phalacrocorax aristotelis	Phalacrocorax aristotelis	Phalacrocorax aristotelis	Phalacrocorax aristotelis	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Calonectris diomedea	Calonectris diomedea	Calonectris diomedea	Calonectris diomedea	Calonectris diomedea	Gelochelidon nilotica	Gelochelidon nilotica	Gelochelidon nilotica	Gelochelidon nilotica	Gelochelidon nilotica	Hydrobates pelagicus	Hydrobates pelagicus	Hydrobates pelagicus	Hydrobates pelagicus	Hydrobates pelagicus	Larus audouinii	Larus audouinii	Larus audouinii	Larus audouinii	Larus audouinii	Larus genei	Larus genei	Larus genei	Larus genei	Larus genei	Larus melanocephalus	Larus melanocephalus	Larus melanocephalus	Larus melanocephalus	Larus melanocephalus	Larus michahellis	Larus michahellis	Larus michahellis	Larus michahellis	Larus michahellis	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Puffinus yelkouan	Puffinus yelkouan	Puffinus yelkouan	Puffinus yelkouan	Puffinus yelkouan	Sterna albifrons	Sterna albifrons	Sterna albifrons	Sterna albifrons	Sterna albifrons	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna sandvicensis	Sterna sandvicensis	Sterna sandvicensis	Sterna sandvicensis	Sterna sandvicensis
Element code	148776	148776	148776	148776	148776	137178	137178	137178	137178	137178	137179	137179	137179	137179	137179	137194	137194	137194	137194	137194	148798	148798	148798	148798	148798	137189	137189	137189	137189	137189	137139	137139	137139	137139	137139	137143	137143	137143	137143	137143	137147	137147	137147	137147	137147	232052	232052	232052	232052	232052	137149	137149	137149	137149	137149	137204	137204	137204	137204	137204	137157	137157	137157	137157	137157	137162	137162	137162	137162	137162	137166	137166	137166	137166	137166
Element code source	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Criterion	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5
Parameter							Other					Other										Other					Other					Other					Other					Other					Other										Other					Other					Other					Other
Parameter other							Relative abundance within community (long term)					Relative abundance within community (long term)										Relative abundance within community (long term)					Relative abundance within community (long term)					Relative abundance within community (long term)					Relative abundance within community (long term)					Relative abundance within community (long term)					Relative abundance within community (long term)										Relative abundance within community (long term)					Relative abundance within community (long term)					Relative abundance within community (long term)					Relative abundance within community (long term)
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative							The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.					The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.										The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.					The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.					The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.					The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.					The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.					The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.										The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.					The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.					The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.					The parameter is considered to have been reached when the rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the species is stable or increasing ( > 0 %). In addition, an expert opinion was considered for all species.
Threshold value source							OSPAR Convention					OSPAR Convention										OSPAR Convention					OSPAR Convention					OSPAR Convention					OSPAR Convention					OSPAR Convention					OSPAR Convention										OSPAR Convention					OSPAR Convention					OSPAR Convention					OSPAR Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper							162.0					1490.0										144.0					-78.0					-28.0					240.0					2813.0					2.0										169.0					60.0					19.0					344.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit							percentage					percentage										percentage					percentage					percentage					percentage					percentage					percentage										percentage					percentage					percentage					percentage
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value							100.0					100.0										100.0					100.0					100.0					100.0					100.0					100.0										100.0					100.0					100.0					100.0
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit							% of population achieving threshold value					% of population achieving threshold value										% of population achieving threshold value					% of population achieving threshold value					% of population achieving threshold value					% of population achieving threshold value					% of population achieving threshold value					% of population achieving threshold value										% of population achieving threshold value					% of population achieving threshold value					% of population achieving threshold value					% of population achieving threshold value
Trend							Unknown					Unknown										Unknown					Unknown					Unknown					Unknown					Unknown					Unknown										Unknown					Unknown					Unknown					Unknown
Parameter achieved							Yes					Yes										Yes					No					Yes					Yes					Yes					Yes										Yes					Yes					Yes					Yes
Description parameter							The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). The rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the crested cormorant is positive between 1988 and 2010 (numbers in 2010 are higher than in 1988). The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is therefore reached for this species.					The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). There were no breeding pairs of the species before 1998, the rate of change in abundance of breeding pairs of the Great Cormorant is positive between 1998 and 2016 (the numbers in 2016 are higher than in 1998). The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is therefore reached for this species.										The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). The rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of Gull-billed tern is positive between 1988 and 2016 (the numbers in 2016 are greater than in 1988). The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is therefore reached for this species.					The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). The rate of change in abundance of the European storm petrel breeding pairs is negative between 1988 and 2010 (the numbers in 2010 are smaller than in 1988). The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is therefore not reached for this species.					The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). The apparent decrease in the abundance of Audouin's Gull breeding pairs between 1988 and 2016 masks fluctuations in the number of breeding pairs, between 50 and 100 pairs depending on the year, with no clearly identifiable numerical trend . The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is thus reached for this species, according to experts, although its rate of evolution between 1988 and 2016 is negative.					The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). The rate of change in the abundance of Slender-billed gull breeding pairs is positive between 1988 and 2016 (the numbers in 2016 are greater than in 1988). The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is therefore reached for this species.					The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). The rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of Mediterranean gull is positive between 1988 and 2016 (the numbers in 2016 are greater than in 1988). The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is therefore reached for this species.					The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). The rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the Yellow-legged gull is positive between 1988 and 2010 (the numbers in 2010 are greater than in 1988). The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is therefore reached for this species.										The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). The rate of change in the abundance of yelkouan shearwater breeding pairs is positive between 1988 and 2010 (numbers in 2010 are higher than in 1988). The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is therefore reached for this species.					The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). The rate of change in abundance of dwarf tern breeding pairs is positive between 1988 and 2016 (numbers in 2016 are higher than in 1988). The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is therefore reached for this species.					The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). The rate of change in abundance of breeding pairs of common terns is positive between 1988 and 2016 (numbers in 2016 are higher than in 1988). The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is therefore reached for this species.					The metric for this parameter is a rate of change in abundance between the reference period (calculated from the 1987-1989 censuses) and the most recent period (2010 or 2016 depending on the species). The rate of change in the abundance of breeding pairs of the Sandwich tern is positive between 1988 and 2016 (the numbers in 2016 are greater than in 1988). The parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" is therefore reached for this species.
Related indicator							Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs					Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs										Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs					Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs					Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs					Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs					Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs					Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs										Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs					Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs					Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs					Abondance des couples d'oiseaux nicheurs
Criteria status	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed
Description criteria							For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.					For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.										For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.					For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.					For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.					For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.					For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.					For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.										For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.					For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.					For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.					For this assessment, the status of criterion D1C2 is considered 'unknown' as methodological developments (protocols, thresholds or indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of this criterion. At present for criterion D1C2, only the attainment of the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is therefore reported for this species.
Element status	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description element	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the European shag in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the European shag in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the European shag in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the European shag in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the European shag in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Great Cormorant in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Great Cormorant in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Great Cormorant in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Great Cormorant in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Great Cormorant in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Gull-billed tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Gull-billed tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Gull-billed tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Gull-billed tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Gull-billed tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is not achieved for storm petrel in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is not achieved for storm petrel in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is not achieved for storm petrel in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is not achieved for storm petrel in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is not achieved for storm petrel in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for Audouin's Gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for Audouin's Gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for Audouin's Gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for Audouin's Gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for Audouin's Gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Slender-billed Gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Slender-billed Gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Slender-billed Gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Slender-billed Gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Slender-billed Gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Mediterranean gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Mediterranean gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Mediterranean gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Mediterranean gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Mediterranean gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Yellow-legged gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Yellow-legged gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Yellow-legged gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Yellow-legged gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Yellow-legged gull in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criterion D1C1 (by-catch), D1C2 (abundance), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated does not allow for an assessment of good ecological status at the species level.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Yelkouan Shearwater in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Yelkouan Shearwater in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Yelkouan Shearwater in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Yelkouan Shearwater in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Yelkouan Shearwater in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Little Tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Little Tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Little Tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Little Tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter 'Relative abundance (long-term calculation)' for breeding pairs is achieved for the Little Tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the common tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the common tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the common tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the common tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the common tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Sandwich tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Sandwich tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Sandwich tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Sandwich tern in this MRU.	The assessment of this species is very partial in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region due to the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (by-catch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and status of species habitats). The too small number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of good ecological status at the species level. However, the results of the assessment show that the parameter "Relative abundance (long-term calculation)" for breeding pairs is achieved for the Sandwich tern in this MRU.
Integration rule type parameter	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description criteria	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.	The integration rule is being developed in the framework of the Joint OSPAR/HELCOM/ICES Working Group on Seabirds.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description overall status	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.	The 2018 assessment of the ecological status for the "Seabirds" component of descriptor 1 was based on a total of 12 species (all species groups combined) at the scale of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (i.e. 20% of the representative species). However, the GES assessment for these species is very partial, given the lack of data to inform criteria D1C1 (bycatch), D1C3 (demographic characteristics), D1C4 (distribution) and D1C5 (extent and condition of species habitats). The too low number of elements calculated therefore does not allow an assessment of GES achievement at the species, species group and seabird component level, although the assessment of OSPAR indicator B1 (abundance of breeding pairs - D1C2) in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region has highlighted a problematic situation for one species in the group of surface seabird species, storm-petrels.
Assessments period	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016	2010-2016
Related pressures
Related targets