Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D6 / France / Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats
Member State France
Region/subregion Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea
Reported by Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire
Report date 2020-02-19
Report access ART8_GES_FR_2020-02-17.xml

SRM MO (MWE-FR-MS-MO)

GES component
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
Feature
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Physical disturbance to seabed
Physical loss of the seabed
Element
Abyssal
Circalittoral coarse sediment
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef
Circalittoral sand
Infralittoral coarse sediment
Infralittoral mixed sediment
Infralittoral mud
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef
Infralittoral sand
Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Lower bathyal sediment
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment
Offshore circalittoral mud
Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef
Offshore circalittoral sand
Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Upper bathyal sediment
Element code
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenCircalitCoarSed
HabBenCircalitMud
HabBenCircalitRock
HabBenCircalitSand
HabBenInfralitCoarSed
HabBenInfralitMxdSed
HabBenInfralitMud
HabBenInfralitRock
HabBenInfralitSand
HabBenBathyalLowRock
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenOffshCoarSed
HabBenOffshMud
HabBenOffshRock
HabBenOffshSand
HabBenBathyalUpRock
HabBenBathyalUpSed
Element code source
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
Criterion
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C3
D6C2
D6C1
Parameter
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Not available yet
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
251.9
28.1
638.3
24.5
10.8
254.6
117.8
326.8
0.1
537.7
12014.0
29.5
Proportion threshold value unit
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of pressure
extent in km2 of pressure
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the marine sub-region and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The proportions of potentially disturbed habitats show disparate values depending on the habitats considered. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "abyssal zone" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter is being met.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the sub-marine region and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse circalittoral coastal sediment" habitat is 251.9 km², i.e. 14.3% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the subregion and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The proportions of potentially disturbed habitats show disparate values depending on the habitats considered. In particular, it was not possible to distinguish between coastal and offshore circalittoral mud, so they are assessed as a single habitat. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "coastal and offshore circalittoral mud" habitat is 9148.3 km², i.e. 91.3% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean subregion. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the sub-marine region and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 28.1 km², i.e. 27% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the sub-marine region and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral sands" habitat is 638.3 km², i.e. 33.2% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing approximately 11% of the MRS area and corresponds mostly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and the east coast of Corsica. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "coarse infralittoral sediment" habitat potentially disturbed is 24.5 km², i.e. 13.1% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed under D6C2 as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the sub-region and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The proportions of potentially disturbed habitats show disparate values depending on the habitats considered. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "mixed infralittoral sediment" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total surface area of the habitat in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRS has been assessed, under D6C2, as representing about 11% of the surface area of the marine sub-region and corresponds mostly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral mud" habitat is 10.8 km², i.e. 38% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the marine sub-region and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral biogenic rock and reef" habitat is 254.6 km², i.e. 26.4% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the marine sub-region and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral sands" habitat is 117.8 km², i.e. 24.5% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this subregion has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the subregion and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The proportions of potentially disturbed habitats show disparate values depending on the habitats considered. In particular, it was not possible to distinguish rocks and reefs from upper and lower bathyal, so these two habitats are assessed as a single habitat. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "rocks and reefs of lower or upper bathyal" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean subregion. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this subregion has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the subregion and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The proportions of potentially disturbed habitats show disparate values depending on the habitats considered. In particular, it was not possible to distinguish between upper and lower bathyal sediments, so these two habitats are evaluated as a single habitat. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "upper and lower bathyal sediment" habitat is 639.4 km², i.e. 0.9% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean subregion. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this marine sub-region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the marine sub-region and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse circalittoral offshore sediment" habitat is 326.8 km², i.e. 74.7% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this subregion has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the subregion and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The proportions of potentially disturbed habitats show disparate values depending on the habitats considered. In particular, it was not possible to distinguish between coastal and offshore circalittoral mud, so they are assessed as a single habitat. The spatial extent of potentially disturbed "coastal and offshore circalittoral mud" habitat is 9148.3 km², i.e. 91.3% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean subregion. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the marine sub-region and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is less than 0.1 km², i.e. 0.01% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not this parameter is being met.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this sub-marine region has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the sub-marine region and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "offshore circalittoral sands" habitat is 537.7 km², i.e. 29.1% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this MRS has been assessed, under D6C2, as representing about 11% of the surface area of the marine sub-region and corresponds mostly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The proportions of potentially disturbed habitats show disparate values depending on the habitats considered. In particular, it was not possible to distinguish rocks and reefs from upper and lower bathyal, so these two habitats are assessed as a single habitat. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "rocks and reefs of lower and upper bathyal" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. Note that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter is being met.
The extent of potential physical disturbance in this subregion has been assessed, within the framework of D6C2, as representing approximately 11% of the surface area of the subregion and corresponds mainly to the coastal areas in the Gulf of Lion and on the east coast of Corsica. The proportions of potentially disturbed habitats show disparate values depending on the habitats considered. In particular, it was not possible to distinguish between upper and lower bathyal sediments, so these two habitats are evaluated as a single habitat. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "upper and lower bathyal sediment" habitat is 639.4 km², i.e. 0.9% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean subregion. It should be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
The spatial extent of the potential physical disturbance of the seabed represents 12,014 km², i.e. about 11% of the surface area of the Western Mediterranean subregion. The results of the assessment show that more than 97% of this potential physical disturbance is attributable to commercial traw fishing. Mooring activities are also responsible for significant potential physical disturbance over approximately 3% of the total area potentially disturbed. Other activities generating potential physical pressure are, in decreasing order of extent: aquaculture and, to a lesser extent, dredging, dredging and coastal development. The reliability of these results is low as there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various D6C2 indicators. It should also be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
Of the 29.5 km² of potential physical loss of the seabed, i.e. 0.03% of the surface area of the Western Mediterranean subregion, about 59% is related to the dumping of dredged material, 31% to dredging and about 10% to coastal development. However, the areas of potential physical loss induced by coastal development are likely underestimated in our assessment. Indeed, according to MEDAM data, the areas claimed from the sea are estimated at 52 km². The reliability of these results is low, as many uncertainties exist in terms of the quality of the data used, but also because of the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various D6C1 indicators. It should also be noted that no threshold is currently available to assess whether or not the parameter has been reached.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele
Description criteria
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "abyssal zone" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible (more than 93%) for the potential physical disturbance induced on "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitats and for the sediments of the lower or upper bathyal of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral coarse sediment" habitat is 251.9 km², i.e. 14.3% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region.The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible (more than 93%) for the potential physical disturbance induced on "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitats and for the sediments of the lower or upper bathyal of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It was not possible to distinguish between inshore and offshore circalittoral mud, so both habitats are assessed as a single habitat. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "coastal and offshore circalittoral mud" habitat is 9148.3 km², i.e. 91.3% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region, but the relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible (more than 93%) for the potential physical disturbance induced on "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitats and for the sediments of the lower or upper bathyal of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral biogenic rocks and reefs" habitat is 28.1 km², i.e. 27% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible (more than 93%) for the potential physical disturbance induced on "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitats and for the sediments of the lower or upper bathyal of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coastal circalittoral sands" habitat is 638.3 km², i.e. 33.2% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. Nevertheless, this assessment shows that for the "infralittoral" type habitats of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region, the contribution of mooring activities to the total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant and varies from 32 to 77% depending on the habitat considered. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral coarse sediment" habitat is 24.5 km², i.e. 13.3% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region.the relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging arts fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that for the "infralittoral" type habitats of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region, the contribution of mooring activities to the total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant and varies from 32 to 77 % depending on the habitat considered. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "mixed infralittoral sediment" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region.The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging arts fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that for the "infralittoral" type habitats of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region, the contribution of mooring activities to the total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant and varies from 32 to 77 % depending on the habitat considered. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral mudflats" habitat is 10.8 km², i.e. 38% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging arts fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that for the "infralittoral" type habitats of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region, the contribution of mooring activities to the total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant and varies from 32 to 77 % depending on the habitat considered. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral biogenic rock and reef" habitat is 254.6 km², i.e. 26.4% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, in particular because of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging arts fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that for the "infralittoral" type habitats of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region, the contribution of mooring activities to the total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant and varies from 32 to 77 % depending on the habitat considered. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "infralittoral sands" habitat is 117.8 km², i.e. 24.5% of the total area of habitat in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging arts fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It was not possible to distinguish between upper and lower bathyal rocks and reefs, so these two habitats are assessed as a single habitat. Thus, the "rocks and reefs of the lower and upper bathyal" habitat is not potentially disturbed. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "rocks and reefs of the lower or upper bathyal" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It was not possible to distinguish between upper and lower bathyal sediments, so these two habitats are assessed as a single habitat. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "upper and lower bathyal sediment" habitat is 639.4 km², i.e. 0.9% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible (more than 93%) for the potential physical disturbance induced on "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitats and for the sediments of the lower or upper bathyal of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The total spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "coarse circalittoral offshore sediment" habitat is 326.8 km², i.e. 74.7% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible (more than 93%) for the potential physical disturbance induced on "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitats and for the sediments of the lower or upper bathyal of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It was not possible to distinguish between inshore and offshore circalittoral mud, so both habitats are assessed as a single habitat. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "coastal and offshore circalittoral mud" habitat is 9148.3 km², i.e. 91.3% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region, but the relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by dragging fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible (more than 93%) for the potential physical disturbance induced on "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitats and for the sediments of the lower or upper bathyal of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "circalittoral offshore rocks and biogenic reefs" habitat is less than 0.1 km², i.e. 0.01% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region. The areas and relative percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity most responsible (more than 93%) for the potential physical disturbance induced on "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitats and for the sediments of the lower or upper bathyal of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The total spatial extent of the potentially disturbed "circalittoral offshore sands" habitat is 537.7 km², i.e. 29.1% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by trolling activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It was not possible to distinguish between upper and lower bathyal rocks and reefs, so these two habitats are assessed as a single habitat. Thus, the "rocks and reefs of the lower and upper bathyal" habitat is not potentially disturbed. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "rocks and reefs of the lower or upper bathyal" habitat is 0 km², i.e. 0% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017), the D6C3 assessment must be carried out for each habitat type and the D6C3 results are not integrated. Furthermore, no threshold has been defined so far for the parameter "Extent": the status of the D6C3 criterion is therefore not reported. However, this assessment shows that professional trolling is the activity mainly responsible for the potential physical disturbance induced on the major benthic habitat types of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. It was not possible to distinguish between upper and lower bathyal sediments, so these two habitats are assessed as a single habitat. The spatial extent of this potentially disturbed "upper and lower bathyal sediment" habitat is 639.4 km², i.e. 0.9% of the total habitat area in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The relative areas and percentages calculated for this assessment should nevertheless be put into perspective, particularly in view of the data and the method used to characterise the areas subject to physical disturbance induced by troll fishing activities.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017) no threshold is to be specified for D6C2: the status of the D6C2 criterion is therefore not reported. However, the assessment of criterion D6C2 shows that the spatial extent of the potential physical disturbance of the seabed represents 12014 km², i.e. approximately 11% of the surface area of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. Although the use of available data on professional trolling increases the actual area under pressure, the assessment shows that more than 97% of the area of potential physical disturbance of the seabed is attributable to this activity.
In accordance with the advice given in Guidance 14 (Walmsley, S.F., Weiss, A., Claussen, U., Connor, D. 2017 Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Integration of assessment results. ABPmer Report No R.2733, produced for the European Commission, DG Environment, February 2017) no threshold is to be specified for D6C1: the status of the D6C1 criterion is therefore not reported. However, the assessment of the D6C1 criterion shows that the potential physical losses represent an area of 29.5 km², i.e. less than 0.03% of the surface area of the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region. The potential physical losses are mainly due to maritime works (extraction of materials, coastal works, dredging, dumping).
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
In the absence of a threshold for the "Extent" parameter, the state of the habitat could not be provided. Furthermore, according to Decision 2017/848/EU, the results of the assessment of criterion D6C3 are used for the assessment of criterion D6C5. However, in the absence of an operational indicator at the level of Descriptor 6 - Benthic Habitats, these results could not be taken into account in the assessment of D6C5.
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Description overall status
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The extent of potential physical disturbance (D6C3) is highly variable (0-91%) depending on the broad habitat type considered. For "coastal circalittoral" and "offshore circalittoral" habitat types, and lower and upper bathyal sediments, commercial traw fisheries are responsible for over 93% of the total potential physical disturbance. For "infralittoral" habitats, the contribution of mooring activities to total potential physical disturbance is particularly significant, ranging from 32% to 77%, depending on the habitat considered. The reliability of these results is considered low, since there are many uncertainties regarding the quality of the data used and the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in the D6C3.
The potential physical disturbance of the seabed is assessed on the basis of data relating to the anthropogenic activities likely to generate these pressures: coastal development, extraction of marine aggregates, dredging and dumping of dredged material, anchorage, aquaculture and professional dragged art fishing. The potential physical disturbance of the seabed (D6C2) represents an area of more than 12014 km² in the Western Mediterranean marine sub-region (10.5% of the surface area of the marine sub-region). Although the use of available data on professional troll fishing increases the actual area under pressure, the assessment shows that almost 97% of the area of potential physical disturbance of the seabed is attributable to this activity, and the reliability of these results is considered to be low as there are many uncertainties in the quality of the data used, as well as in the assumptions and interpretations required to assess the various indicators in D6C2.
Potential physical losses on the seabed are assessed on the basis of data on the anthropogenic activities likely to generate these pressures: coastal developments, extraction of marine aggregates, dredging and dumping of dredged material. Potential physical losses from the seabed (D6C1) represent an area of 29.5 km² in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. less than 0.03% of the area of the marine sub-region). The reliability of these results is considered to be low as many uncertainties exist with respect to the quality of the data used, but also due to the assumptions and interpretations necessary for the assessment of criterion D6C1.
Assessments period
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
Related pressures
Related targets