Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D1-B / Croatia / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15
GES Descriptor D1 Birds
Member State Croatia
Region/subregion Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
Reported by Institute for Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia
Report date 2014-09-04; 2020-10-15
Report access
2014 data
2020 data
Monitoring programme Monitoring programme name
MP_D1_4_6_Birds
MP_D1_4_6_Fish
MP_D1_4_6_Mammals
MP_D1_4_6_Mammals
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats
Monitoring programme Reference existing programme
MADHR-D014
MADHR-D014
MADHR-D014
MADHR-D014
MADHR-D0146
MADHR-D0146
MADHR-D0146
MADHR-D0146
Monitoring programme Marine Unit ID
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
Q4e - Programme ID
MADHR-D014
MADHR-D014
MADHR-D014
MADHR-D014
MADHR-D0146
MADHR-D0146
MADHR-D0146
MADHR-D0146
Q4f - Programme description
All bird species in Croatia are, according to national Nature protection Act (OG 80/2013) strictly protected. Part of the selected marine bird species distribution ranges fall within the borders of several National and Nature Parks. Current monitoring activities exist for all four selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act. Seabirds are good indicators for assessing the state of the marine environment. They breed on the land and therefore the size of the breeding population is relatively easy to monitor regularly. Seabirds feed on the sea so the productivity (number of successfully reared chicks) can give a good response to a range of factors such as change in food (mainly fish, but also cephalopods and small crustaceans) availability and pollution.
Fish: When assessing the impact of fishing on marine ecosystems fish assemblages are an important level to consider since they are directly impacted by fishing, either as target species or through bycatch and discards. Also, much more expertise has been accumulated for the assessment of populations during the century of fishery science and more time series data are available on fish than on any other group of marine organisms. Other human pressures on fish communities are becoming increasingly recognized. As the use of the seas increases, physical pressures, including physical damage and loss of habitats and interference with hydrological pressures, are intensifying. Several authors observed that fish assemblages and/or populations may respond to disturbances like sewage discharges, thermal pollution and alterations to benthic substrates. Sewage, for instance, was demonstrated to affect diversity, abundance, mortality, fecundity of fish and increase the susceptibility to infections and parasite infestation. The impacts of these additional pressures on fish communities have not been quantified at the regional assessment scale.
Mammals: The results from the aerial surveys conducted in 2010 and 2013 show that common bottlenose dolphins and striped dolphins are present in relatively large numbers and are therefore suitable for monitoring as indicator species. Considering there are no historical accounts on the abundance and distribution of these species in the Adriatic, the results of the aerial surveys conducted in 2010 and 2013 can be considered as a reference point for further monitoring. Reptiles: Due to its relatively high abundance and presence in almost any part of the Adriatic Sea, especially in the open pelagic area and North Adriatic, as well as species listed on the main list of protected species, the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) is a suitable component for the assessment and monitoring of GES. Distribution indicators for species Caretta caretta should be carried out at the subregional level (Adriatic Sea). Also, on the subregional level it is necessary to establish indicators spatial / temporal monitoring of the bycatch and mortality due to ingestion of marine litter.
Mammals: The results from the aerial surveys conducted in 2010 and 2013 show that common bottlenose dolphins and striped dolphins are present in relatively large numbers and are therefore suitable for monitoring as indicator species. Considering there are no historical accounts on the abundance and distribution of these species in the Adriatic, the results of the aerial surveys conducted in 2010 and 2013 can be considered as a reference point for further monitoring. Reptiles: Due to its relatively high abundance and presence in almost any part of the Adriatic Sea, especially in the open pelagic area and North Adriatic, as well as species listed on the main list of protected species, the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) is a suitable component for the assessment and monitoring of GES. Distribution indicators for species Caretta caretta should be carried out at the subregional level (Adriatic Sea). Also, on the subregional level it is necessary to establish indicators spatial / temporal monitoring of the bycatch and mortality due to ingestion of marine litter.
The assessment of GES for sea floor integrity in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is based on conclusions and proposals by MSFD Task Group 6 Report. According to that Report it is necessary to identify ecological structures and functions of particular importance, and human pressures to environment. That is described in the Initial Assessment. For the components and pressures of the ecosystems that were identified as being of the greatest importance, it is necessary to use appropriate Attributes and Indicators to assess status relative to preidentified standards for GES. The assessment of GES based on specific attributes of sea floor has to start with the highest risk strata. Based on the list of the attributes of the sea floor integrity proposed by MSFD Task Group 6, for GES assessments of the sea floor integrity attribute Substrate was chosen. Posidonia beds: Posidonia meadows are threatened by various human activity, the most prominent being anthropogenic eutrophication, construction and gravel dumping, mooring, fishing using forbidden bottom trawling tools and spreading of invasive species. Regional approach is needed for further improvement of monitoring methods, intercalibration and data comparison. Through regional approach changes of global importance can be determined (e. g. global warming). Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: Photophilic algal communities (NKS G.3.6.1.), is a part of Reef habitat types according to EUNIS habitat type classification. They represent a predominant habitat type which appears on infralittoral rocky bottom of Mediterranean and Adriatic Sea. The presence of certain algal species is determined by natural and anthropogenic conditions. In the polluted waters, due to discharge of waste or industrial water, a special form of vegetation is developed in the area of the infralittoral. Algal communities under certain stress caused by natural or anthropogenic changes, react in reduction of biodiversity. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: Coralligenous outcrops, which are hard bottoms of biogenic origin that thrive under dim light conditions, represent an endemic habitat for the Mediterranean Sea. They are common all around the Mediterranean coasts (UNEP-MAP-RAC/SPA 2008) and widespread along the Croatian coast. However, this habitat is insufficiently studied and there are no precise historical as well as recent data on its distribution and status. Special care has to be taken with the commercial exploitation of red coral (Corallium rubrum) whose stocks seem to have strongly declined in most areas. Although protected by different legislation, it still can be commercially harvested with no supporting monitoring so far. It is estimated how its colonies are drastically reduced with no information about regeneration success. Red coral should be widely distributed in Adriatic as well as in Mediterranean Sea. Several action plans on the Mediterranean level have proposed ban of harvesting and monitoring of its colonies.
The assessment of GES for sea floor integrity in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is based on conclusions and proposals by MSFD Task Group 6 Report. According to that Report it is necessary to identify ecological structures and functions of particular importance, and human pressures to environment. That is described in the Initial Assessment. For the components and pressures of the ecosystems that were identified as being of the greatest importance, it is necessary to use appropriate Attributes and Indicators to assess status relative to preidentified standards for GES. The assessment of GES based on specific attributes of sea floor has to start with the highest risk strata. Based on the list of the attributes of the sea floor integrity proposed by MSFD Task Group 6, for GES assessments of the sea floor integrity attribute Substrate was chosen. Posidonia beds: Posidonia meadows are threatened by various human activity, the most prominent being anthropogenic eutrophication, construction and gravel dumping, mooring, fishing using forbidden bottom trawling tools and spreading of invasive species. Regional approach is needed for further improvement of monitoring methods, intercalibration and data comparison. Through regional approach changes of global importance can be determined (e. g. global warming). Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: Photophilic algal communities (NKS G.3.6.1.), is a part of Reef habitat types according to EUNIS habitat type classification. They represent a predominant habitat type which appears on infralittoral rocky bottom of Mediterranean and Adriatic Sea. The presence of certain algal species is determined by natural and anthropogenic conditions. In the polluted waters, due to discharge of waste or industrial water, a special form of vegetation is developed in the area of the infralittoral. Algal communities under certain stress caused by natural or anthropogenic changes, react in reduction of biodiversity. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: Coralligenous outcrops, which are hard bottoms of biogenic origin that thrive under dim light conditions, represent an endemic habitat for the Mediterranean Sea. They are common all around the Mediterranean coasts (UNEP-MAP-RAC/SPA 2008) and widespread along the Croatian coast. However, this habitat is insufficiently studied and there are no precise historical as well as recent data on its distribution and status. Special care has to be taken with the commercial exploitation of red coral (Corallium rubrum) whose stocks seem to have strongly declined in most areas. Although protected by different legislation, it still can be commercially harvested with no supporting monitoring so far. It is estimated how its colonies are drastically reduced with no information about regeneration success. Red coral should be widely distributed in Adriatic as well as in Mediterranean Sea. Several action plans on the Mediterranean level have proposed ban of harvesting and monitoring of its colonies.
The assessment of GES for sea floor integrity in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is based on conclusions and proposals by MSFD Task Group 6 Report. According to that Report it is necessary to identify ecological structures and functions of particular importance, and human pressures to environment. That is described in the Initial Assessment. For the components and pressures of the ecosystems that were identified as being of the greatest importance, it is necessary to use appropriate Attributes and Indicators to assess status relative to preidentified standards for GES. The assessment of GES based on specific attributes of sea floor has to start with the highest risk strata. Based on the list of the attributes of the sea floor integrity proposed by MSFD Task Group 6, for GES assessments of the sea floor integrity attribute Substrate was chosen. Posidonia beds: Posidonia meadows are threatened by various human activity, the most prominent being anthropogenic eutrophication, construction and gravel dumping, mooring, fishing using forbidden bottom trawling tools and spreading of invasive species. Regional approach is needed for further improvement of monitoring methods, intercalibration and data comparison. Through regional approach changes of global importance can be determined (e. g. global warming). Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: Photophilic algal communities (NKS G.3.6.1.), is a part of Reef habitat types according to EUNIS habitat type classification. They represent a predominant habitat type which appears on infralittoral rocky bottom of Mediterranean and Adriatic Sea. The presence of certain algal species is determined by natural and anthropogenic conditions. In the polluted waters, due to discharge of waste or industrial water, a special form of vegetation is developed in the area of the infralittoral. Algal communities under certain stress caused by natural or anthropogenic changes, react in reduction of biodiversity. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: Coralligenous outcrops, which are hard bottoms of biogenic origin that thrive under dim light conditions, represent an endemic habitat for the Mediterranean Sea. They are common all around the Mediterranean coasts (UNEP-MAP-RAC/SPA 2008) and widespread along the Croatian coast. However, this habitat is insufficiently studied and there are no precise historical as well as recent data on its distribution and status. Special care has to be taken with the commercial exploitation of red coral (Corallium rubrum) whose stocks seem to have strongly declined in most areas. Although protected by different legislation, it still can be commercially harvested with no supporting monitoring so far. It is estimated how its colonies are drastically reduced with no information about regeneration success. Red coral should be widely distributed in Adriatic as well as in Mediterranean Sea. Several action plans on the Mediterranean level have proposed ban of harvesting and monitoring of its colonies.
The assessment of GES for sea floor integrity in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is based on conclusions and proposals by MSFD Task Group 6 Report. According to that Report it is necessary to identify ecological structures and functions of particular importance, and human pressures to environment. That is described in the Initial Assessment. For the components and pressures of the ecosystems that were identified as being of the greatest importance, it is necessary to use appropriate Attributes and Indicators to assess status relative to preidentified standards for GES. The assessment of GES based on specific attributes of sea floor has to start with the highest risk strata. Based on the list of the attributes of the sea floor integrity proposed by MSFD Task Group 6, for GES assessments of the sea floor integrity attribute Substrate was chosen. Posidonia beds: Posidonia meadows are threatened by various human activity, the most prominent being anthropogenic eutrophication, construction and gravel dumping, mooring, fishing using forbidden bottom trawling tools and spreading of invasive species. Regional approach is needed for further improvement of monitoring methods, intercalibration and data comparison. Through regional approach changes of global importance can be determined (e. g. global warming). Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: Photophilic algal communities (NKS G.3.6.1.), is a part of Reef habitat types according to EUNIS habitat type classification. They represent a predominant habitat type which appears on infralittoral rocky bottom of Mediterranean and Adriatic Sea. The presence of certain algal species is determined by natural and anthropogenic conditions. In the polluted waters, due to discharge of waste or industrial water, a special form of vegetation is developed in the area of the infralittoral. Algal communities under certain stress caused by natural or anthropogenic changes, react in reduction of biodiversity. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: Coralligenous outcrops, which are hard bottoms of biogenic origin that thrive under dim light conditions, represent an endemic habitat for the Mediterranean Sea. They are common all around the Mediterranean coasts (UNEP-MAP-RAC/SPA 2008) and widespread along the Croatian coast. However, this habitat is insufficiently studied and there are no precise historical as well as recent data on its distribution and status. Special care has to be taken with the commercial exploitation of red coral (Corallium rubrum) whose stocks seem to have strongly declined in most areas. Although protected by different legislation, it still can be commercially harvested with no supporting monitoring so far. It is estimated how its colonies are drastically reduced with no information about regeneration success. Red coral should be widely distributed in Adriatic as well as in Mediterranean Sea. Several action plans on the Mediterranean level have proposed ban of harvesting and monitoring of its colonies.
Q5e - Natural variability
  • ExpertOpinion
  • Qualitative
  • Quantiative
  • ExpertOpinion
  • Qualitative
  • Quantiative
  • ExpertOpinion
  • Qualitative
  • Quantiative
  • ExpertOpinion
  • Qualitative
  • Quantiative
  • ExpertOpinion
  • Qualitative
  • Quantiative
  • ExpertOpinion
  • Qualitative
  • Quantiative
  • ExpertOpinion
  • Qualitative
  • Quantiative
  • ExpertOpinion
  • Qualitative
  • Quantiative
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate data
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Established methods
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate capacity
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment
Components for GES assessment and definition of targets and associated indicators for Descriptor 1 have been chosen taking into account the main types of marine species and habitats given in Annex III (Table 1.1.) of the Directive and recommendation of Task Group 1 (Cochrane et al., 2010), following a set of existing legislation (national and international), ongoing monitoring projects and incoming obligations which are part of different directives (Habitat Directive, Water Framework Directive and Bird Directive), as well as expert opinions. All indicators are fully operational since national monitoring programs are being active for several years. Human activities have major impact and influence the state of sea birds, their abundance, distribution range and population condition.
Conducted analysis (Stagličić et al., 2011; Piccinetti et al., 2012) considers trends in multiple datasets where possible, in order to gain some idea of confidence and uncertainty in the trends detected. However, much of the analysis has focused on soft-bottom demersal species, whereas trends with respect to estuarine, coastal, pelagic, deep-water, migratory and diadromous species are much more uncertain and should be interpreted with care. Croatia will work to improve the basis for assessments, taking these components of the marine fish community into account. There is also a need for research to help characterize the impact on fish of climate change and ocean acidification and the pressures from other human activities than fishing, as well as to develop improved information on the causes of declines in diadromous fish species and highly migratory fish such as oceanic sharks.
Mammals: Due to dolphin’s highly mobile nature, distribution and high susceptibility to anthropogenic impact (in the central Adriatic Sea; Croatian and Italian EEZ), it is necessary to conduct monitoring of indicators for the status of bottlenose and striped dolphins on the level of the entire Adriatic. Most of the indicators concerning these species have already been developed. In order to be able to precisely determine the status of the species, it is necessary to connect indicators of other descriptor (threats, habitat, bycatch). Consequences of anthropogenic impacts are changes in the number, distribution and the status of the species, including shortage of prey due to overfishing, incidental bycatch and mortality by fishing gear, pollution (toxic materials, junk) and the occasional intentional killing of individuals. Reptiles: Data on mortality caused by accidental catch or ingestion of marine litter are superficial, so the following monitoring period should be used to establish monitoring protocol and the baseline data required for the implementation of the indicators. The species is exposed to numerous anthropogenic pressures. At the level of the subregion it is mainly related to incidental catches especially in the areas of aggregation. Ingestion of marine litter and collision with ships certainly has significant influence, but currently this impact cannot be quantified.
Mammals: Due to dolphin’s highly mobile nature, distribution and high susceptibility to anthropogenic impact (in the central Adriatic Sea; Croatian and Italian EEZ), it is necessary to conduct monitoring of indicators for the status of bottlenose and striped dolphins on the level of the entire Adriatic. Most of the indicators concerning these species have already been developed. In order to be able to precisely determine the status of the species, it is necessary to connect indicators of other descriptor (threats, habitat, bycatch). Consequences of anthropogenic impacts are changes in the number, distribution and the status of the species, including shortage of prey due to overfishing, incidental bycatch and mortality by fishing gear, pollution (toxic materials, junk) and the occasional intentional killing of individuals. Reptiles: Data on mortality caused by accidental catch or ingestion of marine litter are superficial, so the following monitoring period should be used to establish monitoring protocol and the baseline data required for the implementation of the indicators. The species is exposed to numerous anthropogenic pressures. At the level of the subregion it is mainly related to incidental catches especially in the areas of aggregation. Ingestion of marine litter and collision with ships certainly has significant influence, but currently this impact cannot be quantified.
Over the last century human activities in the area of the Croatian waters in the eastern Adriatic Sea coast increased, both in the intensity and in the area covered by anthropogenic influence. This has resulted in increasing of different kinds of pressures on the marine environment, and especially on the sea-floor. The main pressures that directly impact the state of sea-floor in Croatian waters are in detail described in Initial Assessment. In the near-shore area and in shallower waters these pressures include: building of coastal infrastructures (ports, marinas, defenses against waves etc.), moorings, sand extraction, aquaculture (fish and shellfish farming), riverine inputs and different kind of pollution. In the area off shore in open Adriatic waters main pressures encompasses fishing practice, bottom trawling and dredging. Also, significant impact on sea-floor integrity could have introduction of non-indigenous species through different vectors. Posidonia beds: Within the bioindicator methods compliant with the WDF in the Adriatic Sea, the POMI (Posidonia oceanica Multivariate Index) method has been applied. It is a biotic index containing data about the condition of the whole ecosystem, from the physiological processes in the plant to the population and community structure data. The future monitoring according to the “Natura” and WFD obligations, should take into account Posidonia meadows and the species Posidonia oceanica as biological components of Posidonia meadows and the species P. oceanica as a component for GES. Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: The settlements of photophilic algae are impacted by many human activities. Due to pollution, eutrophication and construction within the sea area infralittoral algal communities react in the way of gradual increase of the qualitative and quantitative dominance of opportunistic species. Therefore, by determining the abundance, biomass and species cover of certain algal groups, it is possible to conclude about the environmental condition of the ecosystem. Excessive expansion of sea urchins also drastically affects the distribution of shallower algal settlements. Their expansion is probably associated with human-induced disturbances in the marine ecosystem. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: Coralligenous assemblages are threatened by specific direct and indirect human activities. These disturbances include direct and indirect impacts of fishing activities, exploitation of the red coral, degradation by eutrophication, the colonization by invasive species and the effects of global climate change. Fishing by nets caused physical destruction of sedentary species like gorgonians and bryozoans and it might be the basic anthropogenic pressure of Coralligenous assemblages in Croatian waters. The effects of disturbances on the coralligenous habitat are still poorly known. For Corallium rubrum decline is basically consequence of overexploitation.
Over the last century human activities in the area of the Croatian waters in the eastern Adriatic Sea coast increased, both in the intensity and in the area covered by anthropogenic influence. This has resulted in increasing of different kinds of pressures on the marine environment, and especially on the sea-floor. The main pressures that directly impact the state of sea-floor in Croatian waters are in detail described in Initial Assessment. In the near-shore area and in shallower waters these pressures include: building of coastal infrastructures (ports, marinas, defenses against waves etc.), moorings, sand extraction, aquaculture (fish and shellfish farming), riverine inputs and different kind of pollution. In the area off shore in open Adriatic waters main pressures encompasses fishing practice, bottom trawling and dredging. Also, significant impact on sea-floor integrity could have introduction of non-indigenous species through different vectors. Posidonia beds: Within the bioindicator methods compliant with the WDF in the Adriatic Sea, the POMI (Posidonia oceanica Multivariate Index) method has been applied. It is a biotic index containing data about the condition of the whole ecosystem, from the physiological processes in the plant to the population and community structure data. The future monitoring according to the “Natura” and WFD obligations, should take into account Posidonia meadows and the species Posidonia oceanica as biological components of Posidonia meadows and the species P. oceanica as a component for GES. Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: The settlements of photophilic algae are impacted by many human activities. Due to pollution, eutrophication and construction within the sea area infralittoral algal communities react in the way of gradual increase of the qualitative and quantitative dominance of opportunistic species. Therefore, by determining the abundance, biomass and species cover of certain algal groups, it is possible to conclude about the environmental condition of the ecosystem. Excessive expansion of sea urchins also drastically affects the distribution of shallower algal settlements. Their expansion is probably associated with human-induced disturbances in the marine ecosystem. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: Coralligenous assemblages are threatened by specific direct and indirect human activities. These disturbances include direct and indirect impacts of fishing activities, exploitation of the red coral, degradation by eutrophication, the colonization by invasive species and the effects of global climate change. Fishing by nets caused physical destruction of sedentary species like gorgonians and bryozoans and it might be the basic anthropogenic pressure of Coralligenous assemblages in Croatian waters. The effects of disturbances on the coralligenous habitat are still poorly known. For Corallium rubrum decline is basically consequence of overexploitation.
Over the last century human activities in the area of the Croatian waters in the eastern Adriatic Sea coast increased, both in the intensity and in the area covered by anthropogenic influence. This has resulted in increasing of different kinds of pressures on the marine environment, and especially on the sea-floor. The main pressures that directly impact the state of sea-floor in Croatian waters are in detail described in Initial Assessment. In the near-shore area and in shallower waters these pressures include: building of coastal infrastructures (ports, marinas, defenses against waves etc.), moorings, sand extraction, aquaculture (fish and shellfish farming), riverine inputs and different kind of pollution. In the area off shore in open Adriatic waters main pressures encompasses fishing practice, bottom trawling and dredging. Also, significant impact on sea-floor integrity could have introduction of non-indigenous species through different vectors. Posidonia beds: Within the bioindicator methods compliant with the WDF in the Adriatic Sea, the POMI (Posidonia oceanica Multivariate Index) method has been applied. It is a biotic index containing data about the condition of the whole ecosystem, from the physiological processes in the plant to the population and community structure data. The future monitoring according to the “Natura” and WFD obligations, should take into account Posidonia meadows and the species Posidonia oceanica as biological components of Posidonia meadows and the species P. oceanica as a component for GES. Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: The settlements of photophilic algae are impacted by many human activities. Due to pollution, eutrophication and construction within the sea area infralittoral algal communities react in the way of gradual increase of the qualitative and quantitative dominance of opportunistic species. Therefore, by determining the abundance, biomass and species cover of certain algal groups, it is possible to conclude about the environmental condition of the ecosystem. Excessive expansion of sea urchins also drastically affects the distribution of shallower algal settlements. Their expansion is probably associated with human-induced disturbances in the marine ecosystem. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: Coralligenous assemblages are threatened by specific direct and indirect human activities. These disturbances include direct and indirect impacts of fishing activities, exploitation of the red coral, degradation by eutrophication, the colonization by invasive species and the effects of global climate change. Fishing by nets caused physical destruction of sedentary species like gorgonians and bryozoans and it might be the basic anthropogenic pressure of Coralligenous assemblages in Croatian waters. The effects of disturbances on the coralligenous habitat are still poorly known. For Corallium rubrum decline is basically consequence of overexploitation.
Over the last century human activities in the area of the Croatian waters in the eastern Adriatic Sea coast increased, both in the intensity and in the area covered by anthropogenic influence. This has resulted in increasing of different kinds of pressures on the marine environment, and especially on the sea-floor. The main pressures that directly impact the state of sea-floor in Croatian waters are in detail described in Initial Assessment. In the near-shore area and in shallower waters these pressures include: building of coastal infrastructures (ports, marinas, defenses against waves etc.), moorings, sand extraction, aquaculture (fish and shellfish farming), riverine inputs and different kind of pollution. In the area off shore in open Adriatic waters main pressures encompasses fishing practice, bottom trawling and dredging. Also, significant impact on sea-floor integrity could have introduction of non-indigenous species through different vectors. Posidonia beds: Within the bioindicator methods compliant with the WDF in the Adriatic Sea, the POMI (Posidonia oceanica Multivariate Index) method has been applied. It is a biotic index containing data about the condition of the whole ecosystem, from the physiological processes in the plant to the population and community structure data. The future monitoring according to the “Natura” and WFD obligations, should take into account Posidonia meadows and the species Posidonia oceanica as biological components of Posidonia meadows and the species P. oceanica as a component for GES. Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: The settlements of photophilic algae are impacted by many human activities. Due to pollution, eutrophication and construction within the sea area infralittoral algal communities react in the way of gradual increase of the qualitative and quantitative dominance of opportunistic species. Therefore, by determining the abundance, biomass and species cover of certain algal groups, it is possible to conclude about the environmental condition of the ecosystem. Excessive expansion of sea urchins also drastically affects the distribution of shallower algal settlements. Their expansion is probably associated with human-induced disturbances in the marine ecosystem. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: Coralligenous assemblages are threatened by specific direct and indirect human activities. These disturbances include direct and indirect impacts of fishing activities, exploitation of the red coral, degradation by eutrophication, the colonization by invasive species and the effects of global climate change. Fishing by nets caused physical destruction of sedentary species like gorgonians and bryozoans and it might be the basic anthropogenic pressure of Coralligenous assemblages in Croatian waters. The effects of disturbances on the coralligenous habitat are still poorly known. For Corallium rubrum decline is basically consequence of overexploitation.
Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment
By2020
By2020
By2020
By2020
By2020
By2020
By2020
By2020
Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment
Q6a -Relevant targets Q6a - Environmental target
Q6a -Relevant targets Q6a - Associated indicator
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6b_SuitableData
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6b_EstablishedMethods
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6d_AdequateCapacity
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Q6c - Target updating
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment
Set of environmental targets and associated indicators is defined taking into account regional (Mediterranean) and sub-regional (Adriatic) approach. They are based on the Initial Assessment, expert opinion and indicative lists of pressures and impacts set out in Table 2 of Annex III, and of characteristics set out in Annex IV. Some of the associated indicators are already operational as a part of existing monitoring programs, such as in the framework of WFD. A group of indicators still has to be developed under Habitat Directive till 2018.
Set of environmental targets and associated indicators is defined taking into account regional (Mediterranean) and subregional (Adriatic) approach. These are based on Initial assessment, expert opinion and indicative lists of pressures and impacts set out in Table 2 of Annex III, and of characteristics set out in Annex IV. Some of the associated indicators are already operational as a part of existing monitoring programs, such as in the framework of WFD. A group of indicators still has to be developed under Habitat Directive till 2018. Taking into account Commission Criteria and Indicators, due to lack of baseline data and unknown trends of biological components, it was not possible to establish the set of environmental targets and associated indicators for a part of Commission Criteria and Indicators. For fish species existing targets have been used wherever suitable (e.g. from the Habitats Directive, OSPAR, Water Framework Directive) and the proposals have been based as far as possible around existing indicators and monitoring programs. There are numerous measures already in place, or planned, which are expected to make a significant contribution to achieving the proposed targets.
Mammals: There is a need for the continuation of abundance and distribution monitoring; determining the cumulative impacts of anthropogenic activities on species (naval transit, fishing, seismic research, hydrocarbon exploitation, pollution, etc.); determining detailed population structure on the local level using DNA analysis, determining dispersion mechanisms and the size of distribution areas; determining detailed population parameters (natality, mortality, acceptable mortality due to anthropogenic impacts, etc.); determining the scale of bycatch mortality in fishing activities and detailed refinement of indicators and possible ways of monitoring status. Reptiles: All targets and associated indicators for the species Caretta caretta are related to the Habitat Directive and therefore will not be operational until its implementation.
Mammals: There is a need for the continuation of abundance and distribution monitoring; determining the cumulative impacts of anthropogenic activities on species (naval transit, fishing, seismic research, hydrocarbon exploitation, pollution, etc.); determining detailed population structure on the local level using DNA analysis, determining dispersion mechanisms and the size of distribution areas; determining detailed population parameters (natality, mortality, acceptable mortality due to anthropogenic impacts, etc.); determining the scale of bycatch mortality in fishing activities and detailed refinement of indicators and possible ways of monitoring status. Reptiles: All targets and associated indicators for the species Caretta caretta are related to the Habitat Directive and therefore will not be operational until its implementation.
With the aim to assess GES in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea, three types of substratum were considered: soft substratum, hard substratum and biogenic habitats. With the aim to identify if a particular change on the sea floor can be defined as degradation, it is necessary to establish does ecosystem function in accordance to its natural conditions. As components of this attribute for assessment of GES, habitats and biocoenosis related to these substrate types were chosen. Benthic habitats and biocoenosis, as components to identify the state of sea floor, are chosen according to National classification of habitats (OG 07/2006). Posidonia beds: All targets and their related indicators for Posidonia meadows and the species Posidonia oceanica are associated with the WFD and Habitat Directive. WFD indicators are developed and in use, while certain Habitat Directive indicators are under development (upper and lower limit of the meadow, habitat distribution, etc.; Guala et al., 2014). Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: All targets and associated indicators for settlement of photophilic algae are related to the WFD and the Habitats Directive. WFD indicators are developed and in use, while certain indicators for the purposes of the Habitats Directive still have to be developed. To determine the current state it is necessary to obtain an accurate habitat map which is expected to be done by 2018. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: All targets and associated indicators are under development, mostly as a part of Habitat directives (Garrabou et al., 2014). As our knowledge on Coralligenous assemblages (formed deeper than 50 m) is minimal, it is essential to start its biological and ecological research. The basic research objectives are: establish baselines on coralligenous species composition and abundance from Croatian coast; identify indicators for assessment of the coralligenous habitat status and functioning; Develop adapted mapping approaches for the coralligenous. The use of modern acoustic methods coupled with the use of ROVs and AUVs should furnish valuable data to fill in the enormous gap in our knowledge on the extension and distribution of coralligenous habitats in Croatian waters but also on the Mediterranean scale.
With the aim to assess GES in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea, three types of substratum were considered: soft substratum, hard substratum and biogenic habitats. With the aim to identify if a particular change on the sea floor can be defined as degradation, it is necessary to establish does ecosystem function in accordance to its natural conditions. As components of this attribute for assessment of GES, habitats and biocoenosis related to these substrate types were chosen. Benthic habitats and biocoenosis, as components to identify the state of sea floor, are chosen according to National classification of habitats (OG 07/2006). Posidonia beds: All targets and their related indicators for Posidonia meadows and the species Posidonia oceanica are associated with the WFD and Habitat Directive. WFD indicators are developed and in use, while certain Habitat Directive indicators are under development (upper and lower limit of the meadow, habitat distribution, etc.; Guala et al., 2014). Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: All targets and associated indicators for settlement of photophilic algae are related to the WFD and the Habitats Directive. WFD indicators are developed and in use, while certain indicators for the purposes of the Habitats Directive still have to be developed. To determine the current state it is necessary to obtain an accurate habitat map which is expected to be done by 2018. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: All targets and associated indicators are under development, mostly as a part of Habitat directives (Garrabou et al., 2014). As our knowledge on Coralligenous assemblages (formed deeper than 50 m) is minimal, it is essential to start its biological and ecological research. The basic research objectives are: establish baselines on coralligenous species composition and abundance from Croatian coast; identify indicators for assessment of the coralligenous habitat status and functioning; Develop adapted mapping approaches for the coralligenous. The use of modern acoustic methods coupled with the use of ROVs and AUVs should furnish valuable data to fill in the enormous gap in our knowledge on the extension and distribution of coralligenous habitats in Croatian waters but also on the Mediterranean scale.
With the aim to assess GES in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea, three types of substratum were considered: soft substratum, hard substratum and biogenic habitats. With the aim to identify if a particular change on the sea floor can be defined as degradation, it is necessary to establish does ecosystem function in accordance to its natural conditions. As components of this attribute for assessment of GES, habitats and biocoenosis related to these substrate types were chosen. Benthic habitats and biocoenosis, as components to identify the state of sea floor, are chosen according to National classification of habitats (OG 07/2006). Posidonia beds: All targets and their related indicators for Posidonia meadows and the species Posidonia oceanica are associated with the WFD and Habitat Directive. WFD indicators are developed and in use, while certain Habitat Directive indicators are under development (upper and lower limit of the meadow, habitat distribution, etc.; Guala et al., 2014). Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: All targets and associated indicators for settlement of photophilic algae are related to the WFD and the Habitats Directive. WFD indicators are developed and in use, while certain indicators for the purposes of the Habitats Directive still have to be developed. To determine the current state it is necessary to obtain an accurate habitat map which is expected to be done by 2018. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: All targets and associated indicators are under development, mostly as a part of Habitat directives (Garrabou et al., 2014). As our knowledge on Coralligenous assemblages (formed deeper than 50 m) is minimal, it is essential to start its biological and ecological research. The basic research objectives are: establish baselines on coralligenous species composition and abundance from Croatian coast; identify indicators for assessment of the coralligenous habitat status and functioning; Develop adapted mapping approaches for the coralligenous. The use of modern acoustic methods coupled with the use of ROVs and AUVs should furnish valuable data to fill in the enormous gap in our knowledge on the extension and distribution of coralligenous habitats in Croatian waters but also on the Mediterranean scale.
With the aim to assess GES in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea, three types of substratum were considered: soft substratum, hard substratum and biogenic habitats. With the aim to identify if a particular change on the sea floor can be defined as degradation, it is necessary to establish does ecosystem function in accordance to its natural conditions. As components of this attribute for assessment of GES, habitats and biocoenosis related to these substrate types were chosen. Benthic habitats and biocoenosis, as components to identify the state of sea floor, are chosen according to National classification of habitats (OG 07/2006). Posidonia beds: All targets and their related indicators for Posidonia meadows and the species Posidonia oceanica are associated with the WFD and Habitat Directive. WFD indicators are developed and in use, while certain Habitat Directive indicators are under development (upper and lower limit of the meadow, habitat distribution, etc.; Guala et al., 2014). Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: All targets and associated indicators for settlement of photophilic algae are related to the WFD and the Habitats Directive. WFD indicators are developed and in use, while certain indicators for the purposes of the Habitats Directive still have to be developed. To determine the current state it is necessary to obtain an accurate habitat map which is expected to be done by 2018. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: All targets and associated indicators are under development, mostly as a part of Habitat directives (Garrabou et al., 2014). As our knowledge on Coralligenous assemblages (formed deeper than 50 m) is minimal, it is essential to start its biological and ecological research. The basic research objectives are: establish baselines on coralligenous species composition and abundance from Croatian coast; identify indicators for assessment of the coralligenous habitat status and functioning; Develop adapted mapping approaches for the coralligenous. The use of modern acoustic methods coupled with the use of ROVs and AUVs should furnish valuable data to fill in the enormous gap in our knowledge on the extension and distribution of coralligenous habitats in Croatian waters but also on the Mediterranean scale.
Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment
By2020
By2020
By2020
By2020
By2020
By2020
By2020
By2020
Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment
Q7a - Relevant activities
  • ResearchSurvey
  • TourismRecreation
  • Aquaculture
  • Fisheries
  • ResearchSurvey
  • TourismRecreation
  • Fisheries
  • ResearchSurvey
  • TourismRecreation
  • Fisheries
  • ResearchSurvey
  • TourismRecreation
  • Aquaculture
  • Fisheries
  • ResearchSurvey
  • TourismRecreation
  • Aquaculture
  • Fisheries
  • ResearchSurvey
  • TourismRecreation
  • Aquaculture
  • Fisheries
  • ResearchSurvey
  • TourismRecreation
  • Aquaculture
  • Fisheries
  • ResearchSurvey
  • TourismRecreation
Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities
Changes in feeding areas due to food availability can be important information for assessment of marine environment. Monitoring of the breeding areas (which only exists) cannot give information on food availability and mortality of sea birds (such information can be obtained using telemetric methods). Due to that, in the next period a telemetric monitoring method for certain marine bird species has to be developed and referential data established. The main goal is to find the basic feeding areas and home-range during breeding period and subsequently track changes in distribution of targeted species. Existing monitoring programme allows the collection of sufficient data for GES assessment under previously stated Commission Decision criteria and indicators (except for criteria 1.3), where methodology for estimation of number of birds accidentally (bycatch) in fishing nets and longlines, and assessment of feeding and resting areas on the sea, still have to be developed.
The future status of all fish species groups is difficult to predict given the wide range of pressures on them and our lack of knowledge on species interactions. The proportion of large fish may improve if relevant measures are taken, for example under the reformed Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and through effective implementation of area-based protection measures (e.g. marine protected areas), but the rate of improvement will depend upon life-history characteristics particular to each species and there may be time lags in responses beyond 2030. It is likely also that there will be continued shifts in the depth, distribution, migration and spawning behaviours of fish species in response to climate-driven warming of the sea which may have profound consequences for commercial and recreational fisheries and for the achievement of stated conservation objectives.
Mammals: It is necessary to re-asses the effectiveness of proposed monitoring methods and indicators in the future, potentially allowing detailed refinement and/or a change of indicators and possible ways of monitoring status. A proposed course of action includes carrying out aerial surveys in the colder part of the year as well, in order to ascertain the distribution patterns, abundance and possible migration patterns of selected species. In order to additionally asses the anthropogenic impact on the status of cetacean populations in the Adriatic and to determine appropriate management measures, additional research should be carried out. It is necessary to determine the population structure on a finer genetic level as well as to determine dispersion mechanisms and the size of distribution areas. Population sub-structuring indicates that conservation measures should be developed not only for the Adriatic as a sub-region but on a regional and local level as well. In order to carry out such an assessment, local populations should be biopsied and biological material for molecular analysis should be obtained. In addition, effort should be devoted to determining the cumulative impacts of anthropogenic activities on species (naval traffic, transit, fishing, seismic research, hydrocarbon exploitation, pollution, etc.). Photoidentification data should be additionally analysed to determine detailed population parameters (birth rate, mortality, acceptable mortality due to anthropogenic impacts, etc.). In order to achieve successful monitoring, it is vital that the activities are carried out throughout the entire Adriatic Sea in collaboration with other countries. Reptiles: There is a need to: develop methodology for population abundance assessment based on aerial survey; determine reference state of the population size; identify sites for wintering aggregation by combining CPUE demersal trawlers and satellite telemetry; because of the time- lag problems in monitoring of population size there should be determined indicators for demographic characteristics a) distribution in the relation to age / size (southern and northern Adriatic), b) size-at-recruitment (southern and northern Adriatic). It is necessary to determine the applicable indicators and limit values for monitoring of mortality caused by the accidental catch and ingestion of marine litter.
Mammals: It is necessary to re-asses the effectiveness of proposed monitoring methods and indicators in the future, potentially allowing detailed refinement and/or a change of indicators and possible ways of monitoring status. A proposed course of action includes carrying out aerial surveys in the colder part of the year as well, in order to ascertain the distribution patterns, abundance and possible migration patterns of selected species. In order to additionally asses the anthropogenic impact on the status of cetacean populations in the Adriatic and to determine appropriate management measures, additional research should be carried out. It is necessary to determine the population structure on a finer genetic level as well as to determine dispersion mechanisms and the size of distribution areas. Population sub-structuring indicates that conservation measures should be developed not only for the Adriatic as a sub-region but on a regional and local level as well. In order to carry out such an assessment, local populations should be biopsied and biological material for molecular analysis should be obtained. In addition, effort should be devoted to determining the cumulative impacts of anthropogenic activities on species (naval traffic, transit, fishing, seismic research, hydrocarbon exploitation, pollution, etc.). Photoidentification data should be additionally analysed to determine detailed population parameters (birth rate, mortality, acceptable mortality due to anthropogenic impacts, etc.). In order to achieve successful monitoring, it is vital that the activities are carried out throughout the entire Adriatic Sea in collaboration with other countries. Reptiles: There is a need to: develop methodology for population abundance assessment based on aerial survey; determine reference state of the population size; identify sites for wintering aggregation by combining CPUE demersal trawlers and satellite telemetry; because of the time- lag problems in monitoring of population size there should be determined indicators for demographic characteristics a) distribution in the relation to age / size (southern and northern Adriatic), b) size-at-recruitment (southern and northern Adriatic). It is necessary to determine the applicable indicators and limit values for monitoring of mortality caused by the accidental catch and ingestion of marine litter.
According to conclusions of MSFD Task Group 6, classes of indicators that are effective at reflecting pollution-related pressures are not necessarily effective at reflecting pressures due to physical disturbances from fishing activities. For the assessment of environmental status on soft bottoms in the areas of bottom trawling in the eastern Adriatic Sea, the new index based on characteristics of epifaunal species of macroinvertebrates in benthic communities is under development. Posidonia beds: It is necessary to map Posidonia meadows and develop a method for monitoring distribution and covered areas within the Habitat Directive. In terms of conservation, there is a need for: reduction of anthropogenic eutrophication, mooring regulation in places where it is frequent, prohibition of gravel dumping and construction in Posidonia meadows, control of fishing by trawling, application of regulative concerning ballast waters. Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: Settlements of photophilic algae and species Cystoseira amentacea inhabit the shallowest area of infralittoral exposed rocky areas, and are widely distributed in the Mediterranean and the Adriatic Sea (the predominant habitat type). They are listed in national (Nature Conservation Act) and international legislation and directives (Habitat directive, Barcelona Convention). For this type of habitat and species, bioindicator methods have been developed in the framework of the WFD. It is necessary to initiate research on methods for restoration of destroyed Cystoseira settlement as well as to understand biological elements which cause excessive expansion of sea urchins. But also, to reduce human made eutrophication and pollution, regulate coastal construction, start a program of restoration of the shallow-water Cystoseira settlements. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: As outlined by the Action plan for the conservation of the coralligenous and other calcareous bio-concretions in the Mediterranean Sea (UNEP-RAC/SPA 2008), measures aimed at protecting the coralligenous environment (applicable to many other coastal benthic habitats) should include the following: wastewater dumping should be banned over coralligenous bottoms, and in their vicinity; trawling prohibition by Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 (Article 4.2) must be rigorously enforced in areas with coralligenous outcrops and in their vicinity, aiming to avoid not only the physical damage to this habitat but also the indirect effects due to increased turbidity and silting; any other anthropogenic activity involving an increase in water turbidity and/or sediment removal (e.g., coastline modification, beach regeneration) should be avoided in the vicinity of coralligenous outcrops. Adequate management of traditional and recreational fisheries must be implemented in order to prevent stock depletion of target fish and crustaceans. Diving should be managed in the manner not to interfere with the normal functioning and conservation of the coralligenous environment. For Corallium rubrum only total ban of harvesting at the moment can lead to species repopulation. A suitable legislation concerning the introduction of alien species should be urgently enacted.
According to conclusions of MSFD Task Group 6, classes of indicators that are effective at reflecting pollution-related pressures are not necessarily effective at reflecting pressures due to physical disturbances from fishing activities. For the assessment of environmental status on soft bottoms in the areas of bottom trawling in the eastern Adriatic Sea, the new index based on characteristics of epifaunal species of macroinvertebrates in benthic communities is under development. Posidonia beds: It is necessary to map Posidonia meadows and develop a method for monitoring distribution and covered areas within the Habitat Directive. In terms of conservation, there is a need for: reduction of anthropogenic eutrophication, mooring regulation in places where it is frequent, prohibition of gravel dumping and construction in Posidonia meadows, control of fishing by trawling, application of regulative concerning ballast waters. Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: Settlements of photophilic algae and species Cystoseira amentacea inhabit the shallowest area of infralittoral exposed rocky areas, and are widely distributed in the Mediterranean and the Adriatic Sea (the predominant habitat type). They are listed in national (Nature Conservation Act) and international legislation and directives (Habitat directive, Barcelona Convention). For this type of habitat and species, bioindicator methods have been developed in the framework of the WFD. It is necessary to initiate research on methods for restoration of destroyed Cystoseira settlement as well as to understand biological elements which cause excessive expansion of sea urchins. But also, to reduce human made eutrophication and pollution, regulate coastal construction, start a program of restoration of the shallow-water Cystoseira settlements. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: As outlined by the Action plan for the conservation of the coralligenous and other calcareous bio-concretions in the Mediterranean Sea (UNEP-RAC/SPA 2008), measures aimed at protecting the coralligenous environment (applicable to many other coastal benthic habitats) should include the following: wastewater dumping should be banned over coralligenous bottoms, and in their vicinity; trawling prohibition by Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 (Article 4.2) must be rigorously enforced in areas with coralligenous outcrops and in their vicinity, aiming to avoid not only the physical damage to this habitat but also the indirect effects due to increased turbidity and silting; any other anthropogenic activity involving an increase in water turbidity and/or sediment removal (e.g., coastline modification, beach regeneration) should be avoided in the vicinity of coralligenous outcrops. Adequate management of traditional and recreational fisheries must be implemented in order to prevent stock depletion of target fish and crustaceans. Diving should be managed in the manner not to interfere with the normal functioning and conservation of the coralligenous environment. For Corallium rubrum only total ban of harvesting at the moment can lead to species repopulation. A suitable legislation concerning the introduction of alien species should be urgently enacted.
According to conclusions of MSFD Task Group 6, classes of indicators that are effective at reflecting pollution-related pressures are not necessarily effective at reflecting pressures due to physical disturbances from fishing activities. For the assessment of environmental status on soft bottoms in the areas of bottom trawling in the eastern Adriatic Sea, the new index based on characteristics of epifaunal species of macroinvertebrates in benthic communities is under development. Posidonia beds: It is necessary to map Posidonia meadows and develop a method for monitoring distribution and covered areas within the Habitat Directive. In terms of conservation, there is a need for: reduction of anthropogenic eutrophication, mooring regulation in places where it is frequent, prohibition of gravel dumping and construction in Posidonia meadows, control of fishing by trawling, application of regulative concerning ballast waters. Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: Settlements of photophilic algae and species Cystoseira amentacea inhabit the shallowest area of infralittoral exposed rocky areas, and are widely distributed in the Mediterranean and the Adriatic Sea (the predominant habitat type). They are listed in national (Nature Conservation Act) and international legislation and directives (Habitat directive, Barcelona Convention). For this type of habitat and species, bioindicator methods have been developed in the framework of the WFD. It is necessary to initiate research on methods for restoration of destroyed Cystoseira settlement as well as to understand biological elements which cause excessive expansion of sea urchins. But also, to reduce human made eutrophication and pollution, regulate coastal construction, start a program of restoration of the shallow-water Cystoseira settlements. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: As outlined by the Action plan for the conservation of the coralligenous and other calcareous bio-concretions in the Mediterranean Sea (UNEP-RAC/SPA 2008), measures aimed at protecting the coralligenous environment (applicable to many other coastal benthic habitats) should include the following: wastewater dumping should be banned over coralligenous bottoms, and in their vicinity; trawling prohibition by Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 (Article 4.2) must be rigorously enforced in areas with coralligenous outcrops and in their vicinity, aiming to avoid not only the physical damage to this habitat but also the indirect effects due to increased turbidity and silting; any other anthropogenic activity involving an increase in water turbidity and/or sediment removal (e.g., coastline modification, beach regeneration) should be avoided in the vicinity of coralligenous outcrops. Adequate management of traditional and recreational fisheries must be implemented in order to prevent stock depletion of target fish and crustaceans. Diving should be managed in the manner not to interfere with the normal functioning and conservation of the coralligenous environment. For Corallium rubrum only total ban of harvesting at the moment can lead to species repopulation. A suitable legislation concerning the introduction of alien species should be urgently enacted.
According to conclusions of MSFD Task Group 6, classes of indicators that are effective at reflecting pollution-related pressures are not necessarily effective at reflecting pressures due to physical disturbances from fishing activities. For the assessment of environmental status on soft bottoms in the areas of bottom trawling in the eastern Adriatic Sea, the new index based on characteristics of epifaunal species of macroinvertebrates in benthic communities is under development. Posidonia beds: It is necessary to map Posidonia meadows and develop a method for monitoring distribution and covered areas within the Habitat Directive. In terms of conservation, there is a need for: reduction of anthropogenic eutrophication, mooring regulation in places where it is frequent, prohibition of gravel dumping and construction in Posidonia meadows, control of fishing by trawling, application of regulative concerning ballast waters. Photophilic algal communities and Cystoseira amentacea: Settlements of photophilic algae and species Cystoseira amentacea inhabit the shallowest area of infralittoral exposed rocky areas, and are widely distributed in the Mediterranean and the Adriatic Sea (the predominant habitat type). They are listed in national (Nature Conservation Act) and international legislation and directives (Habitat directive, Barcelona Convention). For this type of habitat and species, bioindicator methods have been developed in the framework of the WFD. It is necessary to initiate research on methods for restoration of destroyed Cystoseira settlement as well as to understand biological elements which cause excessive expansion of sea urchins. But also, to reduce human made eutrophication and pollution, regulate coastal construction, start a program of restoration of the shallow-water Cystoseira settlements. Coralligenous and species Coralium rubrum: As outlined by the Action plan for the conservation of the coralligenous and other calcareous bio-concretions in the Mediterranean Sea (UNEP-RAC/SPA 2008), measures aimed at protecting the coralligenous environment (applicable to many other coastal benthic habitats) should include the following: wastewater dumping should be banned over coralligenous bottoms, and in their vicinity; trawling prohibition by Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 (Article 4.2) must be rigorously enforced in areas with coralligenous outcrops and in their vicinity, aiming to avoid not only the physical damage to this habitat but also the indirect effects due to increased turbidity and silting; any other anthropogenic activity involving an increase in water turbidity and/or sediment removal (e.g., coastline modification, beach regeneration) should be avoided in the vicinity of coralligenous outcrops. Adequate management of traditional and recreational fisheries must be implemented in order to prevent stock depletion of target fish and crustaceans. Diving should be managed in the manner not to interfere with the normal functioning and conservation of the coralligenous environment. For Corallium rubrum only total ban of harvesting at the moment can lead to species repopulation. A suitable legislation concerning the introduction of alien species should be urgently enacted.
Q7c - Relevant measures
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate data
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Established methods
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate capacity
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures
Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures
Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures
By2014
By2014
By2014
By2014
By2014
By2014
By2014
By2014
Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes
  • Birds
  • Habitats
  • Habitats
  • OSPAR
  • WFD
  • BarCon
  • BarCon
  • BarCon
  • HELCOM
  • Habitats
  • OSPAR
  • WFD
  • BarCon
  • HELCOM
  • Habitats
  • OSPAR
  • WFD
  • BarCon
  • HELCOM
  • Habitats
  • OSPAR
  • WFD
  • BarCon
  • HELCOM
  • Habitats
  • OSPAR
  • WFD
Reference sub-programme Sub-programme ID
MADHR-D014-01
MADHR-D014-04
MADHR-D014-02
MADHR-D014-03
MADHR-D0146-01
MADHR-D0146-02
MADHR-D0146-03
MADHR-D0146-04
Reference sub-programme Sub-programme name
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - state of habitats
Seabed habitats - community characteristics
Seabed habitats - community characteristics
Seabed habitats - community characteristics
Seabed habitats - community characteristics
Q4g - Sub-programmes Sub-programme ID
MADHR-D014-01
MADHR-D014-04
MADHR-D014-02
MADHR-D014-03
MADHR-D0146-01
MADHR-D0146-02
MADHR-D0146-03
MADHR-D0146-04
Q4g - Sub-programmes Sub-programme name
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - state of habitats
Seabed habitats - community characteristics
Seabed habitats - community characteristics
Seabed habitats - community characteristics
Seabed habitats - community characteristics
Q4k - Monitoring purpose
StateImpact
StateImpact
StateImpact
StateImpact
StateImpact
StateImpact
StateImpact
StateImpact
Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions
Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. National monitoring program contributes to MSFD program.
DemMon (Monitoring and management of demersal resources), PELMON (Assessment of distribution and abundance of small pelagic fish by ultrasonic detection and monitoring of pelagic ecosystems of the Adriatic Sea), MEDITS (Mediterranean International Bottom Trawl-Surveys), ADRIAMED (FAO COOPERATIVE PROJECT between ALBANIA, CROATIA, ITALY AND SLOVENIA to Support Responsible Fisheries in the Adriatic Sea) and “Hrvatske vode” (Surveillance and operational monitoring of the quality of coastal and transitional waters according to Water Framework Directive).
Loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) is listed in Annex II of the Protocol on the Specially Protected Areas and the Biological Diversity in the Mediterranean of the Convention for Protection Against Pollution in the Mediterranean Sea (Barcelona Convention), in Annex II of the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention), in Annexes I and II of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (Bonn Convention) and in IUCN list of threatened species. Loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) is listed in Annex II and IV of the Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (SL L 206, 22.07.1992), as it was last supplemented by the Directive of the Council 2013/17/EU on adapting certain directives in the field of environment, by reason of the accession of the Republic of Croatia (SL L 158, 10.06.2013).
National monitoring program contributes to MSFD program.
National monitoring program contributes to MSFD program.
National monitoring program contributes to MSFD program.
Habitat type Reefs according to EUNIS habitat types classification, and thus the settlement of photophilic algae which it includes, are listed as important habitats under the Habitats Directive and Natura areas. Species Cystoseira amentacea is listed in Annex II of the Barcelona Convention and is included in the list of strictly protected species in Croatia. National monitoring program contributes to MSFD program.
Q5c - Features Q5c - Habitats
  • Terrestrial parts of MS
  • WaterColumnHabitatsAll HabitatsOther
  • WaterColumnHabitatsAll
  • WaterColumnHabitatsAll
  • WaterColumnHabitatsAll
  • LitRock LitSed ShallSand ShallMud ShallMxdSed ShelfMxdSed UBathSed CorallTrottoir PosidBeds
  • LitRock LitSed ShallSand ShallMud ShallMxdSed ShelfMxdSed UBathSed CorallTrottoir PosidBeds
  • LitRock LitSed ShallSand ShallMud ShallMxdSed ShelfMxdSed UBathSed CorallTrottoir PosidBeds
  • LitRock LitSed ShallSand ShallMud ShallMxdSed ShelfMxdSed UBathSed CorallTrottoir PosidBeds
Q5c - Features Q5c - Species list
  • (Acerbi,
  • (Linnaeus,
  • (Payraudeau,
  • (Scopoli,
  • 1761)
  • 1769)
  • 1826)
  • 1827)
  • AnnexII_IV_V_Species
  • BirdsAll
  • Calonectris
  • Larus
  • Phalacrocorax
  • Puffinus
  • WildBirdSpecies
  • aristotelis
  • audouinii
  • diomedea
  • puffinus
  • yelkouan
  • FishAll
  • FunctionalGroupOther
  • Pelagic plankton community
  • (Linnaeus,
  • (Meyen,
  • 1758)
  • 1833)
  • Caretta
  • FunctionalGroupOther
  • MammalsAll
  • ReptilesAll
  • Stenella
  • Tursiops truncatus (Montagu, 1821)
  • caretta
  • coeruleoalba
  • (Linnaeus,
  • (Meyen,
  • 1758)
  • 1833)
  • Caretta
  • FunctionalGroupOther
  • MammalsAll
  • ReptilesAll
  • Stenella
  • Tursiops truncatus (Montagu, 1821)
  • caretta
  • coeruleoalba
  • (L.)
  • (Linnaeus,
  • 1753)
  • Cystoseira amentacea (C.Agardh) Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1832
  • Delile
  • FunctionalGroupOther
  • Posidonia
  • Zostera
  • marina
  • oceanica
  • (L.)
  • (Linnaeus,
  • 1753)
  • Cystoseira amentacea (C.Agardh) Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1832
  • Delile
  • FunctionalGroupOther
  • Posidonia
  • Zostera
  • marina
  • oceanica
  • (L.)
  • (Linnaeus,
  • 1753)
  • Cystoseira amentacea (C.Agardh) Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1832
  • Delile
  • FunctionalGroupOther
  • Posidonia
  • Zostera
  • marina
  • oceanica
  • (L.)
  • (Linnaeus,
  • 1753)
  • Cystoseira amentacea (C.Agardh) Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1832
  • Delile
  • FunctionalGroupOther
  • Posidonia
  • Zostera
  • marina
  • oceanica
Q5c - Features Q5c - Physical/Chemical features
Q5c - Features Q5c - Pressures
  • ExtractSpeciesFishShellfish
Q9a - Elements
  • Species group: BirdsHabitats Directive Annex II, IV and V speciesBirds Directive Wild Bird SpeciesPhalacrocorax aristotelis (Linnaeus, 1761)Calonectris diomedea (Scopoli, 1769)Larus audouinii (Payraudeau, 1826)Puffinus puffinus yelkouan (Acerbi, 1827)Terrestrial parts of MS: Offshore islands of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands, several islands in Lastovo archipelago, Korčula, Mljet, Pelješac peninsula and small, non-inhabited islands distributed in the whole Adriatic Sea.
  • Water column habitats - allFor pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarnerić Area, middle adriatic island with transect toward open sea For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit AreaFor coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik AreasFunctional group: Coastal fishFunctional group: Pelagic fishFunctional group: Demersal fishFunctional group: Demersal elasmobranchsPressure: Extraction of species: fish and shellfishSelected species are: pelagic fish: Sardina pilchardus and Engraulis encrasicolus, demersal and coastal fish: Mullus barbatus, Mullus surmuletus, Diplodus vulgaris, Diplodus sargus, Scorpaena scrofa, Scorpaena porcus, Symphodus tinca, Labrus mixtus, Pagellus erythrinus, Epinephelus marginatus, Aspidotrigla cuculus, Zosterissesor ophiocephalus; cartilaginous fish Scyliorhinus canicula and Raja mireletus and transitional waters fishes: Atherina boyeri and Liza ramada.
  • Water column habitats – allSpecies group: MammalsStenella coeruleoalba (Meyen, 1833)Tursiops truncatus (Montagu, 1821)
  • Water column habitats – allSpecies group: ReptilesCaretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758)
  • Seabed habitats: Littoral rock and biogenic reefLittoral sedimentShallow sublittoral sandShallow sublittoral mixed sedimentShelf sublittoral mixed sedimentUpper bathyal sediment
  • Seabed habitats: Littoral sedimentSeabed habitats: Shallow sublittoral sandPosidBeds; Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile
  • Seabed habitats: Littoral sedimentSeabed habitats: Shallow sublittoral sandSeabed habitats: Shallow sublittoral mudSeabed habitats: Shallow sublittoral mixed sedimentOther: Invertebrates (benthic)
  • Seabed habitats: Littoral rock and biogenic reefCystoseira amentacea (C.Agardh) Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1832
Q5a - GES criteria Relevant GES criteria
  • 1.1
  • 1.2
  • 1.3
  • 4.1
  • 4.2
  • 1.1
  • 1.2
  • 1.3
  • 1.7
  • 4.1
  • 4.2
  • 4.3
  • 1.1
  • 1.2
  • 1.3
  • 4.1
  • 4.2
  • 1.1
  • 1.2
  • 1.3
  • 4.1
  • 4.2
  • 1.1
  • 1.2
  • 1.3
  • 1.4
  • 1.5
  • 1.6
  • 4.3
  • 6.1
  • 6.2
  • 1.1
  • 1.2
  • 1.3
  • 1.4
  • 1.5
  • 1.6
  • 4.3
  • 6.1
  • 6.2
  • 1.1
  • 1.2
  • 1.3
  • 1.4
  • 1.5
  • 1.6
  • 4.3
  • 6.1
  • 6.2
  • 1.1
  • 1.2
  • 1.3
  • 1.4
  • 1.5
  • 1.6
  • 4.3
  • 6.1
  • 6.2
Q5b - GES indicators Relevant GES indicators
  • 1.1.1
  • 1.2.1
  • 1.3.1
  • 4.1.1
  • 4.2.1
  • 1.1.1
  • 1.2.1
  • 1.3.1
  • 1.7.1
  • 4.1.1
  • 4.2.1
  • 4.3.1
  • 1.1.1
  • 1.1.2
  • 1.2.1
  • 1.3.1
  • 4.1.1
  • 4.2.1
  • 1.1.1
  • 1.1.2
  • 1.2.1
  • 1.3.1
  • 4.1.1
  • 4.2.1
  • 1.1.1
  • 1.2.1
  • 1.3.1
  • 1.4.1
  • 1.4.2
  • 1.5.1
  • 1.6.1
  • 1.6.2
  • 4.3.1
  • 6.1.1
  • 6.1.2
  • 6.2.1
  • 6.2.2
  • 1.1.1
  • 1.2.1
  • 1.3.1
  • 1.4.1
  • 1.4.2
  • 1.5.1
  • 1.6.1
  • 1.6.2
  • 4.3.1
  • 6.1.1
  • 6.1.2
  • 6.2.1
  • 6.2.2
  • 1.1.1
  • 1.2.1
  • 1.3.1
  • 1.4.1
  • 1.4.2
  • 1.5.1
  • 1.6.1
  • 1.6.2
  • 4.3.1
  • 6.1.1
  • 6.1.2
  • 6.2.1
  • 6.2.2
  • 1.1.1
  • 1.2.1
  • 1.3.1
  • 1.4.1
  • 1.4.2
  • 1.5.1
  • 1.6.1
  • 1.6.2
  • 4.3.1
  • 6.1.1
  • 6.1.2
  • 6.2.1
  • 6.2.2
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species distribution
  • MP-9b-1-1-1
  • MP-9b-1-1-2
  • MP-9b-1-1-1
  • MP-9b-1-1-1
  • MP-9b-1-1-1
  • MP-9b-1-1-1
  • MP-9b-1-1-1
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species population size
  • MP-9b-1-2-1
  • MP-9b-1-2-1
  • MP-9b-1-2-2
  • MP-9b-1-2-1
  • MP-9b-1-2-1
  • MP-9b-1-2-1
  • MP-9b-1-2-2
  • MP-9b-1-2-1
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species population characteristics
  • MP-9b-1-3-1
  • MP-9b-1-3-2
  • MP-9b-1-3-3
  • MP-9b-1-3-6
  • MP-9b-1-3-1
  • MP-9b-1-3-2
  • MP-9b-1-3-3
  • MP-9b-1-3-6
  • MP-9b-1-3-1
  • MP-9b-1-3-2
  • MP-9b-1-3-3
  • MP-9b-1-3-5
  • MP-9b-1-3-8
  • MP-9b-1-3-1
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species impacts
  • MP-9b-1-4-2
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat distribution
  • MP-9b-1-5-1
  • MP-9b-1-5-1
  • MP-9b-1-5-1
  • MP-9b-1-5-1
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat extent
  • MP-9b-1-6-1
  • MP-9b-1-6-1
  • MP-9b-1-6-2
  • MP-9b-1-6-2
  • MP-9b-1-6-1
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat condition (physical-chemical)
  • MP-9b-1-7-11
  • MP-9b-1-7-1
  • MP-9b-1-7-11
  • MP-9b-1-7-12
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat condition (biological)
  • MP-9b-1-8-1
  • MP-9b-1-8-2
  • MP-9b-1-8-3
  • MP-9b-1-8-1
  • MP-9b-1-8-2
  • MP-9b-1-8-1
  • MP-9b-1-8-2
  • MP-9b-1-8-1
  • MP-9b-1-8-2
  • MP-9b-1-8-3
  • MP-9b-1-8-5
  • MP-9b-1-8-1
  • MP-9b-1-8-2
  • MP-9b-1-8-6
  • MP-9b-1-8-1
  • MP-9b-1-8-2
  • MP-9b-1-8-1
  • MP-9b-1-8-2
  • MP-9b-1-8-5
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat impacts
  • MP-9b-1-9-1
  • MP-9b-1-9-1
  • MP-9b-1-9-2
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) Pressure input
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) Pressure output
  • MP-9b-2-2-5
  • MP-9b-2-2-1
  • MP-9b-2-2-5
Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) Activity
Q9b Parameters monitored (other) Other
Q41 Spatial scope
MSland_FW WFD_CW
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters
Q4j - Description of spatial scope
Selected bird species (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii, Larus audouinii) highly depend on good status of marine environment, because they feed on the sea, mainly on large areas. Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. Birds that breed within borders of protected areas (national and nature parks) are monitored as a part of protected areas management plans implementation. Cory’s Shearwater breeds on offshore island of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands and also on several islands in Lastovo archipelago. Yelkouan Shearwater breeds on only on three offshore islands: in Lastovo archipelago and on Svetac (Sv. Andrija) and Kamik islands. Audouin's Gull breeds on several islands in Southern Adriatic Sea, in area between islands Korčula, Mljet and Lastovo and Pelješac peninsula. European Shag breeds on small, non-inhabited island distributed in whole Adriatic Sea. The largest population (more than 30% of national population) breeds in the middle Adriatic Sea, within the borders of designated NATURA2000 SPA HR1000034 Northern part of Zadar Archipelago. Croatian populations of seabirds are threatened due expansion of commercial fisheries in seabird feeding areas, combined with the impacts of invasive alien species (rats) and seagulls at nesting colonies, physical damaging of nesting areas, by catch and probably mortality caused by ingestion of marine litter.
According to ecological preferences, south Adriatic is represented with higher number of thermopile and bathyphile species while higher presence and abundance of boreal species is characteristic for north Adriatic. Central Adriatic is transitional area. Most species, apart from some endemic species, belong to the Mediterranean and Mediterranean-Atlantic biogeographic region (almost 67%). Cosmopolitan (generally of a circumglobal character in warm and moderately warm seas) and other more widely distributed fish species are represented with about 17%. Around 9% of species occur only in the limited Mediterranean region while the Pontic Mediterranean, Indo-Pacific and Lessepssian species together with Adriatic endemic comprise around 7.3%.
Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) is present in the entire Adriatic. It is more abundant in areas above the continental shelf, up to a depth of 150 – 200 m and in areas inside Croatian territorial waters. Striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba) is present in the South Adriatic. The area inhabited by this species is the pelagic part of the South-Adriatic pit, at depths of 200 m or more. Occasionally, single individuals or smaller groups appear in areas of middle and North Adriatic. Due to their highly mobile nature, distribution and the high anthropogenic impact in the middle Adriatic especially (Croatian and Italian EEZ), it is necessary to conduct monitoring of indicators for the status of bottlenose and striped dolphins on the level of the entire Adriatic.
Due to the large geographic mobility, monitoring of Distribution indicators for species Caretta caretta should be carried out at the subregional level (Adriatic Sea). Also, on the subregional level it is necessary to establish indicators spatial / temporal monitoring of the bycatch and mortality due to ingestion of marine litter.
The proposed area for investigation of epifauna of benthic invertebrates on soft bottoms are Croatian territorial waters, coastal and insular region. That area is under different anthropogenic pressures, mainly fishery activities. Sampling stations are placed on different substrata and depths.
Posidonia oceanica meadows are consider to be habitats with highest diversity in Mediterranean Sea with important role in production of oxygen and organic matter and prevention of coastal erosion. Posidonia meadows are developed almost along entire Croatian coast and that is the reason way program of monitoring Posidonia oceanica will include stations along that area.
In order to monitor changes in the composition of macro and meiofauna invertebrates on soft bottoms in the Northern Adriatic. proposed monitoring activities include sampling at 10 selected stations
Settlements of photophilic algae and species Cystoseira amentacea inhabit the shallowest area of infralittoral exposed rocky areas, and are widely distributed in the Mediterranean and the Adriatic Sea (the predominant habitat type).
Marine Unit IDs
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
  • MAD-HR-MS-ADRIATIC
Q4h - Temporal scope Start date- End date
2010-9999
1998-9999
2010-9999
2010-9999
2013-9999
2007-9999
2000-9999
2012-9999
Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling
  • Yearly
  • 6monthly
  • 3yearly Yearly
  • 3yearly
  • Yearly
  • 3yearly
  • 3yearly Yearly
  • 3yearly
Q9c - Monitoring method
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr)
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr)
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr)
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr)
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr)
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr)
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar, G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr)
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr)
Q9d - Description of alteration to method
Q9e - Quality assurance
Q9f - Quality control
DelayedValidation
DelayedValidation
DelayedValidation
DelayedValidation
DelayedValidation
DelayedValidation
DelayedValidation
DelayedValidation
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling Q9g - Proportion of area covered %
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling Q9g - No. of samples
Q9i - Description of sample representivity
No variation within the sub-programme.
For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period) For transitional fish: twice a year (in spring and autumn period) For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarnerić Area, middle adriatic island with transect toward open sea For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas
The aerial survey aimed at collecting data for abundance estimates and distribution patterns should be carried out every 3rd year. Photoidentification analysis for population assessment should be carried out every year or every second year, depending on the site. Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
no variations
No variation within sub-programme.
No variation within the sub-programme.
Monitoring have to be performed once a year or once in three years during the summer (June/July).
No variation within the sub-programme.
Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data
  • EU
  • Region
  • Subregion
  • Region
  • Subregion
  • Region
  • Subregion
  • Region
  • Subregion
  • Region
  • Subregion
  • Region
  • Subregion
  • Region
  • Subregion
  • Region
  • Subregion
Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data type
DataProducts
DataProducts
DataProducts
DataProducts
DataProducts
DataProducts
DataProducts
DataProducts
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data access mechanism
LocationNationalDC
LocationNationalDC
LocationNationalDC
LocationNationalDC
LocationNationalDC
LocationNationalDC
LocationNationalDC
LocationNationalDC
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data access rights
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - INSPIRE standard
HabitatsBiotopes
SeaRegions
SeaRegions
SeaRegions
SeaRegions
SeaRegions
SeaRegions
SeaRegions
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c Date data are available
2020-10
2020-10
2020-10
2020-10
2020-10
2020-10
2020-10
2020-10
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data update frequency
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
3yearly
Yearly
3yearly
Yearly
3yearly
Q10d - Description of data access
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development.
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development.
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development.
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development.
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development.
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development.
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development.
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development.
Descriptor
D1.1
D1.1
D1.1
D1.1
D1.1
D1.1
D1.1
D1.1
D1.1
D1.1
Monitoring strategy description
Seabirds are monitored to assess trends in population size and distribution. Data are gathered within different projects but all use methodology of census of the active nests (apparently occupied nest) or census of the adult birds present on the colonies. Occasionally breeding success is recorded too. Some projects are using GPS or radio telemetry to gather data about birds feeding and resting habitats. Monitoring of the pressures and threats is not quantified i.e. it is based on simple observation of the pressure present on the colony or other bird habitat. Bycatch data are based on casual observations and therefore hard to analyse.
Seabirds are monitored to assess trends in population size and distribution. Data are gathered within different projects but all use methodology of census of the active nests (apparently occupied nest) or census of the adult birds present on the colonies. Occasionally breeding success is recorded too. Some projects are using GPS or radio telemetry to gather data about birds feeding and resting habitats. Monitoring of the pressures and threats is not quantified i.e. it is based on simple observation of the pressure present on the colony or other bird habitat. Bycatch data are based on casual observations and therefore hard to analyse.
Seabirds are monitored to assess trends in population size and distribution. Data are gathered within different projects but all use methodology of census of the active nests (apparently occupied nest) or census of the adult birds present on the colonies. Occasionally breeding success is recorded too. Some projects are using GPS or radio telemetry to gather data about birds feeding and resting habitats. Monitoring of the pressures and threats is not quantified i.e. it is based on simple observation of the pressure present on the colony or other bird habitat. Bycatch data are based on casual observations and therefore hard to analyse.
Seabirds are monitored to assess trends in population size and distribution. Data are gathered within different projects but all use methodology of census of the active nests (apparently occupied nest) or census of the adult birds present on the colonies. Occasionally breeding success is recorded too. Some projects are using GPS or radio telemetry to gather data about birds feeding and resting habitats. Monitoring of the pressures and threats is not quantified i.e. it is based on simple observation of the pressure present on the colony or other bird habitat. Bycatch data are based on casual observations and therefore hard to analyse.
Seabirds are monitored to assess trends in population size and distribution. Data are gathered within different projects but all use methodology of census of the active nests (apparently occupied nest) or census of the adult birds present on the colonies. Occasionally breeding success is recorded too. Some projects are using GPS or radio telemetry to gather data about birds feeding and resting habitats. Monitoring of the pressures and threats is not quantified i.e. it is based on simple observation of the pressure present on the colony or other bird habitat. Bycatch data are based on casual observations and therefore hard to analyse.
Seabirds are monitored to assess trends in population size and distribution. Data are gathered within different projects but all use methodology of census of the active nests (apparently occupied nest) or census of the adult birds present on the colonies. Occasionally breeding success is recorded too. Some projects are using GPS or radio telemetry to gather data about birds feeding and resting habitats. Monitoring of the pressures and threats is not quantified i.e. it is based on simple observation of the pressure present on the colony or other bird habitat. Bycatch data are based on casual observations and therefore hard to analyse.
Seabirds are monitored to assess trends in population size and distribution. Data are gathered within different projects but all use methodology of census of the active nests (apparently occupied nest) or census of the adult birds present on the colonies. Occasionally breeding success is recorded too. Some projects are using GPS or radio telemetry to gather data about birds feeding and resting habitats. Monitoring of the pressures and threats is not quantified i.e. it is based on simple observation of the pressure present on the colony or other bird habitat. Bycatch data are based on casual observations and therefore hard to analyse.
Seabirds are monitored to assess trends in population size and distribution. Data are gathered within different projects but all use methodology of census of the active nests (apparently occupied nest) or census of the adult birds present on the colonies. Occasionally breeding success is recorded too. Some projects are using GPS or radio telemetry to gather data about birds feeding and resting habitats. Monitoring of the pressures and threats is not quantified i.e. it is based on simple observation of the pressure present on the colony or other bird habitat. Bycatch data are based on casual observations and therefore hard to analyse.
Seabirds are monitored to assess trends in population size and distribution. Data are gathered within different projects but all use methodology of census of the active nests (apparently occupied nest) or census of the adult birds present on the colonies. Occasionally breeding success is recorded too. Some projects are using GPS or radio telemetry to gather data about birds feeding and resting habitats. Monitoring of the pressures and threats is not quantified i.e. it is based on simple observation of the pressure present on the colony or other bird habitat. Bycatch data are based on casual observations and therefore hard to analyse.
Seabirds are monitored to assess trends in population size and distribution. Data are gathered within different projects but all use methodology of census of the active nests (apparently occupied nest) or census of the adult birds present on the colonies. Occasionally breeding success is recorded too. Some projects are using GPS or radio telemetry to gather data about birds feeding and resting habitats. Monitoring of the pressures and threats is not quantified i.e. it is based on simple observation of the pressure present on the colony or other bird habitat. Bycatch data are based on casual observations and therefore hard to analyse.
Coverage of GES criteria
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Gaps and plans
Since no comprehensive or systematically collected data about bycatch exists in Croatia evaluation of criterion D1C1 is impossible. Monitoring of the pressures and threats to the seabird populations should be improved by development of monitoring protocols and engagement of fishery sector in data collection.
Since no comprehensive or systematically collected data about bycatch exists in Croatia evaluation of criterion D1C1 is impossible. Monitoring of the pressures and threats to the seabird populations should be improved by development of monitoring protocols and engagement of fishery sector in data collection.
Since no comprehensive or systematically collected data about bycatch exists in Croatia evaluation of criterion D1C1 is impossible. Monitoring of the pressures and threats to the seabird populations should be improved by development of monitoring protocols and engagement of fishery sector in data collection.
Since no comprehensive or systematically collected data about bycatch exists in Croatia evaluation of criterion D1C1 is impossible. Monitoring of the pressures and threats to the seabird populations should be improved by development of monitoring protocols and engagement of fishery sector in data collection.
Since no comprehensive or systematically collected data about bycatch exists in Croatia evaluation of criterion D1C1 is impossible. Monitoring of the pressures and threats to the seabird populations should be improved by development of monitoring protocols and engagement of fishery sector in data collection.
Since no comprehensive or systematically collected data about bycatch exists in Croatia evaluation of criterion D1C1 is impossible. Monitoring of the pressures and threats to the seabird populations should be improved by development of monitoring protocols and engagement of fishery sector in data collection.
Since no comprehensive or systematically collected data about bycatch exists in Croatia evaluation of criterion D1C1 is impossible. Monitoring of the pressures and threats to the seabird populations should be improved by development of monitoring protocols and engagement of fishery sector in data collection.
Since no comprehensive or systematically collected data about bycatch exists in Croatia evaluation of criterion D1C1 is impossible. Monitoring of the pressures and threats to the seabird populations should be improved by development of monitoring protocols and engagement of fishery sector in data collection.
Since no comprehensive or systematically collected data about bycatch exists in Croatia evaluation of criterion D1C1 is impossible. Monitoring of the pressures and threats to the seabird populations should be improved by development of monitoring protocols and engagement of fishery sector in data collection.
Since no comprehensive or systematically collected data about bycatch exists in Croatia evaluation of criterion D1C1 is impossible. Monitoring of the pressures and threats to the seabird populations should be improved by development of monitoring protocols and engagement of fishery sector in data collection.
Related targets
  • D1T3 - Birds
  • D1T3 - Birds
  • D1T3 - Birds
  • D1T3 - Birds
  • D1T3 - Birds
  • D1T3 - Birds
  • D1T3 - Birds
  • D1T3 - Birds
  • D1T3 - Birds
  • D1T3 - Birds
Coverage of targets
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Related measures
Coverage of measures
Related monitoring programmes
  • MADHR-D01-01
  • MADHR-D01-01
  • MADHR-D01-01
  • MADHR-D01-01
  • MADHR-D01-01
  • MADHR-D01-01
  • MADHR-D01-01
  • MADHR-D01-01
  • MADHR-D01-01
  • MADHR-D01-01
Programme code
MADHR-D01-01
MADHR-D01-01
MADHR-D01-01
MADHR-D01-01
MADHR-D01-01
MADHR-D01-01
MADHR-D01-01
MADHR-D01-01
MADHR-D01-01
MADHR-D01-01
Programme name
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Mobile species - population characteristics
Update type
Modified from 2014
Modified from 2014
Modified from 2014
Modified from 2014
Modified from 2014
Modified from 2014
Modified from 2014
Modified from 2014
Modified from 2014
Modified from 2014
Old programme codes
  • MADHR-D014-01
  • MADHR-D014-01
  • MADHR-D014-01
  • MADHR-D014-01
  • MADHR-D014-01
  • MADHR-D014-01
  • MADHR-D014-01
  • MADHR-D014-01
  • MADHR-D014-01
  • MADHR-D014-01
Programme description
Selected bird species (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii, Larus audouinii) highly depend on good status of marine environment, because they feed on the sea, mainly on large areas. Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. Birds that breed within borders of protected areas (national and nature parks) are monitored as a part of protected areas management plans implementation. Calonectris diomedea breeds on offshore island of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands and also on several islands in Lastovo archipelago. Puffinus yelkouan breeds on only on three offshore islands: in Lastovo archipelago and on Svetac (Sv. Andrija) and Kamik islands. Larus audouinii breeds on several islands in Southern Adriatic Sea, in area between islands Korcula, Mljet and Lastovo and Pelješac peninsula. Phalacrocorax aristotelis breeds on small, non-inhabited island distributed in whole Adriatic Sea. The largest population (more than 30% of national population) breeds in the middle Adriatic Sea, within the borders of designated NATURA2000 SPA HR1000034 Northern part of Zadar Archipelago.
Selected bird species (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii, Larus audouinii) highly depend on good status of marine environment, because they feed on the sea, mainly on large areas. Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. Birds that breed within borders of protected areas (national and nature parks) are monitored as a part of protected areas management plans implementation. Calonectris diomedea breeds on offshore island of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands and also on several islands in Lastovo archipelago. Puffinus yelkouan breeds on only on three offshore islands: in Lastovo archipelago and on Svetac (Sv. Andrija) and Kamik islands. Larus audouinii breeds on several islands in Southern Adriatic Sea, in area between islands Korcula, Mljet and Lastovo and Pelješac peninsula. Phalacrocorax aristotelis breeds on small, non-inhabited island distributed in whole Adriatic Sea. The largest population (more than 30% of national population) breeds in the middle Adriatic Sea, within the borders of designated NATURA2000 SPA HR1000034 Northern part of Zadar Archipelago.
Selected bird species (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii, Larus audouinii) highly depend on good status of marine environment, because they feed on the sea, mainly on large areas. Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. Birds that breed within borders of protected areas (national and nature parks) are monitored as a part of protected areas management plans implementation. Calonectris diomedea breeds on offshore island of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands and also on several islands in Lastovo archipelago. Puffinus yelkouan breeds on only on three offshore islands: in Lastovo archipelago and on Svetac (Sv. Andrija) and Kamik islands. Larus audouinii breeds on several islands in Southern Adriatic Sea, in area between islands Korcula, Mljet and Lastovo and Pelješac peninsula. Phalacrocorax aristotelis breeds on small, non-inhabited island distributed in whole Adriatic Sea. The largest population (more than 30% of national population) breeds in the middle Adriatic Sea, within the borders of designated NATURA2000 SPA HR1000034 Northern part of Zadar Archipelago.
Selected bird species (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii, Larus audouinii) highly depend on good status of marine environment, because they feed on the sea, mainly on large areas. Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. Birds that breed within borders of protected areas (national and nature parks) are monitored as a part of protected areas management plans implementation. Calonectris diomedea breeds on offshore island of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands and also on several islands in Lastovo archipelago. Puffinus yelkouan breeds on only on three offshore islands: in Lastovo archipelago and on Svetac (Sv. Andrija) and Kamik islands. Larus audouinii breeds on several islands in Southern Adriatic Sea, in area between islands Korcula, Mljet and Lastovo and Pelješac peninsula. Phalacrocorax aristotelis breeds on small, non-inhabited island distributed in whole Adriatic Sea. The largest population (more than 30% of national population) breeds in the middle Adriatic Sea, within the borders of designated NATURA2000 SPA HR1000034 Northern part of Zadar Archipelago.
Selected bird species (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii, Larus audouinii) highly depend on good status of marine environment, because they feed on the sea, mainly on large areas. Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. Birds that breed within borders of protected areas (national and nature parks) are monitored as a part of protected areas management plans implementation. Calonectris diomedea breeds on offshore island of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands and also on several islands in Lastovo archipelago. Puffinus yelkouan breeds on only on three offshore islands: in Lastovo archipelago and on Svetac (Sv. Andrija) and Kamik islands. Larus audouinii breeds on several islands in Southern Adriatic Sea, in area between islands Korcula, Mljet and Lastovo and Pelješac peninsula. Phalacrocorax aristotelis breeds on small, non-inhabited island distributed in whole Adriatic Sea. The largest population (more than 30% of national population) breeds in the middle Adriatic Sea, within the borders of designated NATURA2000 SPA HR1000034 Northern part of Zadar Archipelago.
Selected bird species (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii, Larus audouinii) highly depend on good status of marine environment, because they feed on the sea, mainly on large areas. Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. Birds that breed within borders of protected areas (national and nature parks) are monitored as a part of protected areas management plans implementation. Calonectris diomedea breeds on offshore island of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands and also on several islands in Lastovo archipelago. Puffinus yelkouan breeds on only on three offshore islands: in Lastovo archipelago and on Svetac (Sv. Andrija) and Kamik islands. Larus audouinii breeds on several islands in Southern Adriatic Sea, in area between islands Korcula, Mljet and Lastovo and Pelješac peninsula. Phalacrocorax aristotelis breeds on small, non-inhabited island distributed in whole Adriatic Sea. The largest population (more than 30% of national population) breeds in the middle Adriatic Sea, within the borders of designated NATURA2000 SPA HR1000034 Northern part of Zadar Archipelago.
Selected bird species (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii, Larus audouinii) highly depend on good status of marine environment, because they feed on the sea, mainly on large areas. Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. Birds that breed within borders of protected areas (national and nature parks) are monitored as a part of protected areas management plans implementation. Calonectris diomedea breeds on offshore island of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands and also on several islands in Lastovo archipelago. Puffinus yelkouan breeds on only on three offshore islands: in Lastovo archipelago and on Svetac (Sv. Andrija) and Kamik islands. Larus audouinii breeds on several islands in Southern Adriatic Sea, in area between islands Korcula, Mljet and Lastovo and Pelješac peninsula. Phalacrocorax aristotelis breeds on small, non-inhabited island distributed in whole Adriatic Sea. The largest population (more than 30% of national population) breeds in the middle Adriatic Sea, within the borders of designated NATURA2000 SPA HR1000034 Northern part of Zadar Archipelago.
Selected bird species (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii, Larus audouinii) highly depend on good status of marine environment, because they feed on the sea, mainly on large areas. Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. Birds that breed within borders of protected areas (national and nature parks) are monitored as a part of protected areas management plans implementation. Calonectris diomedea breeds on offshore island of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands and also on several islands in Lastovo archipelago. Puffinus yelkouan breeds on only on three offshore islands: in Lastovo archipelago and on Svetac (Sv. Andrija) and Kamik islands. Larus audouinii breeds on several islands in Southern Adriatic Sea, in area between islands Korcula, Mljet and Lastovo and Pelješac peninsula. Phalacrocorax aristotelis breeds on small, non-inhabited island distributed in whole Adriatic Sea. The largest population (more than 30% of national population) breeds in the middle Adriatic Sea, within the borders of designated NATURA2000 SPA HR1000034 Northern part of Zadar Archipelago.
Selected bird species (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii, Larus audouinii) highly depend on good status of marine environment, because they feed on the sea, mainly on large areas. Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. Birds that breed within borders of protected areas (national and nature parks) are monitored as a part of protected areas management plans implementation. Calonectris diomedea breeds on offshore island of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands and also on several islands in Lastovo archipelago. Puffinus yelkouan breeds on only on three offshore islands: in Lastovo archipelago and on Svetac (Sv. Andrija) and Kamik islands. Larus audouinii breeds on several islands in Southern Adriatic Sea, in area between islands Korcula, Mljet and Lastovo and Pelješac peninsula. Phalacrocorax aristotelis breeds on small, non-inhabited island distributed in whole Adriatic Sea. The largest population (more than 30% of national population) breeds in the middle Adriatic Sea, within the borders of designated NATURA2000 SPA HR1000034 Northern part of Zadar Archipelago.
Selected bird species (Calonectris diomedea, Puffinus yelkouan, Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii, Larus audouinii) highly depend on good status of marine environment, because they feed on the sea, mainly on large areas. Monitoring activities exists for all 4 selected bird species, because they are foreseen within existing commitments and legislation such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and national Nature protection Act as well. Birds that breed within borders of protected areas (national and nature parks) are monitored as a part of protected areas management plans implementation. Calonectris diomedea breeds on offshore island of Southern Adriatic Sea: St. Andrija, Kamik and Palagruža Islands and also on several islands in Lastovo archipelago. Puffinus yelkouan breeds on only on three offshore islands: in Lastovo archipelago and on Svetac (Sv. Andrija) and Kamik islands. Larus audouinii breeds on several islands in Southern Adriatic Sea, in area between islands Korcula, Mljet and Lastovo and Pelješac peninsula. Phalacrocorax aristotelis breeds on small, non-inhabited island distributed in whole Adriatic Sea. The largest population (more than 30% of national population) breeds in the middle Adriatic Sea, within the borders of designated NATURA2000 SPA HR1000034 Northern part of Zadar Archipelago.
Monitoring purpose
  • Environmental state and impacts
  • Environmental state and impacts
  • Environmental state and impacts
  • Environmental state and impacts
  • Environmental state and impacts
  • Environmental state and impacts
  • Environmental state and impacts
  • Environmental state and impacts
  • Environmental state and impacts
  • Environmental state and impacts
Other policies and conventions
  • Birds Directive
  • Habitats Directive
  • Birds Directive
  • Habitats Directive
  • Birds Directive
  • Habitats Directive
  • Birds Directive
  • Habitats Directive
  • Birds Directive
  • Habitats Directive
  • Birds Directive
  • Habitats Directive
  • Birds Directive
  • Habitats Directive
  • Birds Directive
  • Habitats Directive
  • Birds Directive
  • Habitats Directive
  • Birds Directive
  • Habitats Directive
Regional cooperation - coordinating body
Regional cooperation - countries involved
Regional cooperation - implementation level
Monitoring details
Features
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Pelagic-feeding birds
Surface-feeding birds
Elements
  • Phalacrocorax aristotelis
  • Calonectris diomedea diomedea
  • Larus audouinii
  • Puffinus yelkouan
  • Phalacrocorax aristotelis
  • Calonectris diomedea diomedea
  • Larus audouinii
  • Puffinus yelkouan
  • Phalacrocorax aristotelis
  • Calonectris diomedea diomedea
  • Larus audouinii
  • Puffinus yelkouan
  • Phalacrocorax aristotelis
  • Calonectris diomedea diomedea
  • Larus audouinii
  • Puffinus yelkouan
  • Phalacrocorax aristotelis
  • Calonectris diomedea diomedea
  • Larus audouinii
  • Puffinus yelkouan
GES criteria
D1C1
D1C1
D1C2
D1C2
D1C3
D1C3
D1C4
D1C4
D1C5
D1C5
Parameters
  • Mortality rate
  • Mortality rate
  • Abundance (number of individuals)
  • Abundance (number of individuals)
  • Survival rate
  • Survival rate
  • Distribution (spatial)
  • Distribution (spatial)
  • Extent
  • Extent
Parameter Other
Spatial scope
  • Territorial waters
  • Territorial waters
  • Territorial waters
  • Territorial waters
  • Territorial waters
  • Territorial waters
  • Territorial waters
  • Territorial waters
  • Territorial waters
  • Territorial waters
Marine reporting units
  • MAD-HR-MRU_1
  • MAD-HR-MRU_1
  • MAD-HR-MRU_1
  • MAD-HR-MRU_1
  • MAD-HR-MRU_1
  • MAD-HR-MRU_1
  • MAD-HR-MRU_1
  • MAD-HR-MRU_1
  • MAD-HR-MRU_1
  • MAD-HR-MRU_1
Temporal scope (start date - end date)
2021-2026
2021-2026
2021-2026
2021-2026
2021-2026
2021-2026
2021-2026
2021-2026
2021-2026
2021-2026
Monitoring frequency
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Monitoring type
  • In-situ sampling coastal
  • In-situ sampling land/beach
  • Visual observation
  • In-situ sampling coastal
  • In-situ sampling land/beach
  • Visual observation
  • In-situ sampling coastal
  • In-situ sampling land/beach
  • Visual observation
  • In-situ sampling coastal
  • In-situ sampling land/beach
  • Visual observation
  • In-situ sampling coastal
  • In-situ sampling land/beach
  • Visual observation
  • In-situ sampling coastal
  • In-situ sampling land/beach
  • Visual observation
  • In-situ sampling coastal
  • In-situ sampling land/beach
  • Visual observation
  • In-situ sampling coastal
  • In-situ sampling land/beach
  • Visual observation
  • In-situ sampling coastal
  • In-situ sampling land/beach
  • Visual observation
  • In-situ sampling coastal
  • In-situ sampling land/beach
  • Visual observation
Monitoring method
  • Other monitoring method
  • Other monitoring method
  • Other monitoring method
  • Other monitoring method
  • Other monitoring method
  • Other monitoring method
  • Other monitoring method
  • Other monitoring method
  • Other monitoring method
  • Other monitoring method
Monitoring method other
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf
Quality control
As used in the reported monitoring method.
As used in the reported monitoring method.
As used in the reported monitoring method.
As used in the reported monitoring method.
As used in the reported monitoring method.
As used in the reported monitoring method.
As used in the reported monitoring method.
As used in the reported monitoring method.
As used in the reported monitoring method.
As used in the reported monitoring method.
Data management
Data access
Related indicator/name
Contact
References