MS/Art11/2020/D1-F/Croatia/Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea

Member State report / Art11 / 2020 / D1-F / Croatia / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due	2020-10-15
GES Descriptor	D1 Fish
Member State	Croatia
Region/subregion	Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
Reported by	Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries
Report date	2020-10-15
Report access	ART11_Programmes_HR.xml msfd-ART11_StrategiesHR.xml

Simplified table

Descriptor	D1.4	D1.4	D1.4	D1.4	D1.4	D1.4	D1.4	D1.4	D1.4
Monitoring strategy description	The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management.	The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management.	The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management.	The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management.	The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management.	The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management.	The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management.	The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management.	The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management.
Coverage of GES criteria	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Gaps and plans	During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria.	During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria.	During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria.	During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria.	During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria.	During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria.	During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria.	During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria.	During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria.
Related targets	D1T4 - Fish	D1T4 - Fish	D1T4 - Fish	D1T4 - Fish	D1T4 - Fish	D1T4 - Fish	D1T4 - Fish	D1T4 - Fish	D1T4 - Fish
Coverage of targets	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Related measures
Coverage of measures
Related monitoring programmes	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04
Programme code	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04	MADHR-D01-04
Programme name	Mobile species - population characteristics	Mobile species - population characteristics	Mobile species - population characteristics	Mobile species - population characteristics	Mobile species - population characteristics	Mobile species - population characteristics	Mobile species - population characteristics	Mobile species - population characteristics	Mobile species - population characteristics
Update type	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014
Old programme codes	MADHR-D014-04	MADHR-D014-04	MADHR-D014-04	MADHR-D014-04	MADHR-D014-04	MADHR-D014-04	MADHR-D014-04	MADHR-D014-04	MADHR-D014-04
Programme description	Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures.	Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures.	Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures.	Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures.	Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures.	Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures.	Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures.	Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures.	Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures.
Monitoring purpose	Environmental state and impacts	Environmental state and impacts	Environmental state and impacts	Environmental state and impacts	Environmental state and impacts	Environmental state and impacts	Environmental state and impacts	Environmental state and impacts	Environmental state and impacts
Other policies and conventions	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) Water Framework Directive	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) Water Framework Directive	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) Water Framework Directive	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) Water Framework Directive	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) Water Framework Directive	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) Water Framework Directive	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) Water Framework Directive	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) Water Framework Directive	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) Water Framework Directive
Regional cooperation - coordinating body
Regional cooperation - countries involved
Regional cooperation - implementation level
Monitoring details	For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period) For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas	For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period) For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas	For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period) For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas	For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period) For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas	For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period) For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas	For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period) For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas	For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period) For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas	For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period) For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas	For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period) For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period) For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas
Features	Coastal fish	Demersal shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Coastal fish	Demersal shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Coastal fish	Demersal shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish
Elements	Diplodus sargus Diplodus vulgaris Epinephelus marginatus Raja miraletus Scorpaena porcus Scorpaena scrofa	Merluccius merluccius Mullus barbatus barbatus Mullus surmuletus Scyliorhinus canicula	Engraulis encrasicolus Pagellus erythrinus Sardina pilchardus	Diplodus sargus Diplodus vulgaris Epinephelus marginatus Raja miraletus Scorpaena porcus Scorpaena scrofa	Merluccius merluccius Mullus barbatus barbatus Mullus surmuletus Scyliorhinus canicula	Engraulis encrasicolus Pagellus erythrinus Sardina pilchardus	Diplodus sargus Diplodus vulgaris Epinephelus marginatus Raja miraletus Scorpaena porcus Scorpaena scrofa	Merluccius merluccius Mullus barbatus barbatus Mullus surmuletus Scyliorhinus canicula	Engraulis encrasicolus Pagellus erythrinus Sardina pilchardus
GES criteria	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C3	D1C3	D1C4	D1C4	D1C4
Parameters	Abundance (number of individuals)	Abundance (number of individuals)	Abundance (number of individuals)	Length	Length	Length	Distribution (spatial)	Distribution (spatial)	Distribution (spatial)
Parameter Other
Spatial scope	Territorial waters	Territorial waters	Territorial waters	Territorial waters	Territorial waters	Territorial waters	Territorial waters	Territorial waters	Territorial waters
Marine reporting units	MAD-HR-MRU_1	MAD-HR-MRU_1	MAD-HR-MRU_1	MAD-HR-MRU_1	MAD-HR-MRU_1	MAD-HR-MRU_1	MAD-HR-MRU_1	MAD-HR-MRU_1	MAD-HR-MRU_1
Temporal scope (start date - end date)	2021-2026	2021-2026	2021-2026	2021-2026	2021-2026	2021-2026	2021-2026	2021-2026	2021-2026
Monitoring frequency	2-yearly	2-yearly	2-yearly	2-yearly	2-yearly	2-yearly	2-yearly	2-yearly	2-yearly
Monitoring type	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore
Monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method
Monitoring method other	Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf	Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf	Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf	Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf	Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf	Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf	Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf	Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf	Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf
Quality control	As used in the reported monitoring method.	As used in the reported monitoring method.	As used in the reported monitoring method.	As used in the reported monitoring method.	As used in the reported monitoring method.	As used in the reported monitoring method.	As used in the reported monitoring method.	As used in the reported monitoring method.	As used in the reported monitoring method.
Data management
Data access	https://vrtlac.izor.hr/ords/msfd/	https://vrtlac.izor.hr/ords/msfd/	https://vrtlac.izor.hr/ords/msfd/	https://vrtlac.izor.hr/ords/msfd/	https://vrtlac.izor.hr/ords/msfd/	https://vrtlac.izor.hr/ords/msfd/	https://vrtlac.izor.hr/ords/msfd/	https://vrtlac.izor.hr/ords/msfd/	https://vrtlac.izor.hr/ords/msfd/
Related indicator/name	Mean length by species in coastal waters Distributional range Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates)	Mean length by species in coastal waters Distributional range Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates)	Mean length by species in coastal waters Distributional range Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates)	Mean length by species in coastal waters Distributional range Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates)	Mean length by species in coastal waters Distributional range Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates)	Mean length by species in coastal waters Distributional range Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates)	Mean length by species in coastal waters Distributional range Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates)	Mean length by species in coastal waters Distributional range Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates)	Mean length by species in coastal waters Distributional range Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates)
Contact
References