Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D1-C / Croatia / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Cephalopods |
| Member State | Croatia |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea |
| Reported by | Institute for Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia |
| Report date | 2014-09-04; 2020-10-15 |
| Report access |
2014 data
2020 data
| Monitoring programme | Monitoring programme name |
|---|---|
| Monitoring programme | Reference existing programme |
| Monitoring programme | Marine Unit ID |
| Q4e - Programme ID | |
| Q4f - Programme description | |
| Q5e - Natural variability | |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate data |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Established methods |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate capacity |
| Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment | |
| Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment | |
| Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment | |
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Environmental target |
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Associated indicator |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_SuitableData |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_EstablishedMethods |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6d_AdequateCapacity |
| Q6c - Target updating | |
| Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment | |
| Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment | |
| Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment | |
| Q7a - Relevant activities | |
| Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities | |
| Q7c - Relevant measures | |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate data |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Established methods |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate capacity |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures |
| Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures | |
| Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures | |
| Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes | |
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme ID |
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme name |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme ID |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme name |
| Q4k - Monitoring purpose | |
| Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions | |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Habitats |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Species list |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Physical/Chemical features |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Pressures |
| Q9a - Elements | |
| Q5a - GES criteria | Relevant GES criteria |
| Q5b - GES indicators | Relevant GES indicators |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species distribution |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population size |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population characteristics |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species impacts |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat distribution |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat extent |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (physical-chemical) |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (biological) |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat impacts |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure input |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure output |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) | Activity |
| Q9b Parameters monitored (other) | Other |
| Q41 Spatial scope | |
| Q4j - Description of spatial scope | |
| Marine Unit IDs | |
| Q4h - Temporal scope | Start date- End date |
| Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling | |
| Q9c - Monitoring method | |
| Q9d - Description of alteration to method | |
| Q9e - Quality assurance | |
| Q9f - Quality control | |
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - Proportion of area covered % |
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - No. of samples |
| Q9i - Description of sample representivity | |
| Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data | |
| Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data | |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data type |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access mechanism |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access rights |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - INSPIRE standard |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c Date data are available |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data update frequency |
| Q10d - Description of data access | |
Descriptor |
D1.5 |
D1.5 |
D1.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
Cephalopods play an important role in the Adriatic marine ecosystems and in commercial fishing (primarily demersal). During MEDITS expeditions in the Adriatic, 32 species of cephalopods were recorded. Most cephalopods in the Adriatic are short-lived organisms whose biomass varies significantly depending on the intensity of recruitment, and it is closely related to hydrographic conditions in the sea (primarily temperature and salinity). Given the fact that cephalopods are an important part of commercial fishing, the intensity of fishing also has a significant impact on biomass. The most important species in the coastal part are Eledone moschata, Loligo vulgaris, Octopus vulgaris and Sepia officinalis. In the deeper parts of the Adriatic, the most common species are Eledone cirrhosa, Illex coindetti, Todarodes eblane. The main strategy of monitoring is to assess the environmental status of the most commercially important cephalopod species that are intensively exploited by fishery fleet in the Adriatic Sea. The assessment will be based on determination of the level of anthropogenic pressure, population density, demographic characteristics of the exploited populations, and distribution of the species in the Adriatic Sea. Monitoring of the main cephalopod species will be conducted through scientific research at sea (MEDITS) and monitoring of commercial demersal fishery through EU framework for the collection and management of fisheries data (DCF). Monitoring sampling scheme and processing of the biological data will be conduct in accordance to the sampling scheme already described for demersal species under Descriptor 3 (Commercial Fish and shellfish). |
Cephalopods play an important role in the Adriatic marine ecosystems and in commercial fishing (primarily demersal). During MEDITS expeditions in the Adriatic, 32 species of cephalopods were recorded. Most cephalopods in the Adriatic are short-lived organisms whose biomass varies significantly depending on the intensity of recruitment, and it is closely related to hydrographic conditions in the sea (primarily temperature and salinity). Given the fact that cephalopods are an important part of commercial fishing, the intensity of fishing also has a significant impact on biomass. The most important species in the coastal part are Eledone moschata, Loligo vulgaris, Octopus vulgaris and Sepia officinalis. In the deeper parts of the Adriatic, the most common species are Eledone cirrhosa, Illex coindetti, Todarodes eblane. The main strategy of monitoring is to assess the environmental status of the most commercially important cephalopod species that are intensively exploited by fishery fleet in the Adriatic Sea. The assessment will be based on determination of the level of anthropogenic pressure, population density, demographic characteristics of the exploited populations, and distribution of the species in the Adriatic Sea. Monitoring of the main cephalopod species will be conducted through scientific research at sea (MEDITS) and monitoring of commercial demersal fishery through EU framework for the collection and management of fisheries data (DCF). Monitoring sampling scheme and processing of the biological data will be conduct in accordance to the sampling scheme already described for demersal species under Descriptor 3 (Commercial Fish and shellfish). |
Cephalopods play an important role in the Adriatic marine ecosystems and in commercial fishing (primarily demersal). During MEDITS expeditions in the Adriatic, 32 species of cephalopods were recorded. Most cephalopods in the Adriatic are short-lived organisms whose biomass varies significantly depending on the intensity of recruitment, and it is closely related to hydrographic conditions in the sea (primarily temperature and salinity). Given the fact that cephalopods are an important part of commercial fishing, the intensity of fishing also has a significant impact on biomass. The most important species in the coastal part are Eledone moschata, Loligo vulgaris, Octopus vulgaris and Sepia officinalis. In the deeper parts of the Adriatic, the most common species are Eledone cirrhosa, Illex coindetti, Todarodes eblane. The main strategy of monitoring is to assess the environmental status of the most commercially important cephalopod species that are intensively exploited by fishery fleet in the Adriatic Sea. The assessment will be based on determination of the level of anthropogenic pressure, population density, demographic characteristics of the exploited populations, and distribution of the species in the Adriatic Sea. Monitoring of the main cephalopod species will be conducted through scientific research at sea (MEDITS) and monitoring of commercial demersal fishery through EU framework for the collection and management of fisheries data (DCF). Monitoring sampling scheme and processing of the biological data will be conduct in accordance to the sampling scheme already described for demersal species under Descriptor 3 (Commercial Fish and shellfish). |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Gaps and plans |
The hydrographic conditions in the Adriatic Sea have seasonal trends and as it was aforementioned, those conditions are closely related to the biomass of short-lived organisms such as cephalopods. In order to collect more detailed information on environmental status of those species additional seasonal scientific surveys should be considered. The current monitoring strategy is going to cover seasonal sampling through monitoring of the commercial fisheries fleet. However, the information collected through commercial fisheries are dependent on methodologies of certain fisheries, specific management measures (season closures, mesh sizes, minimum reference size of species etc.) or socioeconomic factors, and cannot provide representative data on population density trends and distribution of target species. |
The hydrographic conditions in the Adriatic Sea have seasonal trends and as it was aforementioned, those conditions are closely related to the biomass of short-lived organisms such as cephalopods. In order to collect more detailed information on environmental status of those species additional seasonal scientific surveys should be considered. The current monitoring strategy is going to cover seasonal sampling through monitoring of the commercial fisheries fleet. However, the information collected through commercial fisheries are dependent on methodologies of certain fisheries, specific management measures (season closures, mesh sizes, minimum reference size of species etc.) or socioeconomic factors, and cannot provide representative data on population density trends and distribution of target species. |
The hydrographic conditions in the Adriatic Sea have seasonal trends and as it was aforementioned, those conditions are closely related to the biomass of short-lived organisms such as cephalopods. In order to collect more detailed information on environmental status of those species additional seasonal scientific surveys should be considered. The current monitoring strategy is going to cover seasonal sampling through monitoring of the commercial fisheries fleet. However, the information collected through commercial fisheries are dependent on methodologies of certain fisheries, specific management measures (season closures, mesh sizes, minimum reference size of species etc.) or socioeconomic factors, and cannot provide representative data on population density trends and distribution of target species. |
Related targets |
|||
Coverage of targets |
|||
Related measures |
|||
Coverage of measures |
|||
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
Programme code |
MADHR-D01-06 |
MADHR-D01-06 |
MADHR-D01-06 |
Programme name |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Update type |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
Old programme codes |
|||
Programme description |
Cephalopods play an important role in the commercial fishing. The majority of data will be collected during scientific and fishery biological research within the MEDITS expedition, whose research area is the entire Croatian territorial sea from the coastline to a depth of 500 meters. |
Cephalopods play an important role in the commercial fishing. The majority of data will be collected during scientific and fishery biological research within the MEDITS expedition, whose research area is the entire Croatian territorial sea from the coastline to a depth of 500 meters. |
Cephalopods play an important role in the commercial fishing. The majority of data will be collected during scientific and fishery biological research within the MEDITS expedition, whose research area is the entire Croatian territorial sea from the coastline to a depth of 500 meters. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
|||
Monitoring details |
Data will be collected through scientific research at sea within the MEDITS program and through sampling on commercial fishing vessels through the implementation of DCF. |
Data will be collected through scientific research at sea within the MEDITS program and through sampling on commercial fishing vessels through the implementation of DCF. |
Data will be collected through scientific research at sea within the MEDITS program and through sampling on commercial fishing vessels through the implementation of DCF. |
Features |
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
|
Elements |
|
|
|
GES criteria |
D1C2 |
D1C3 |
D1C4 |
Parameters |
|
|
|
Parameter Other |
|||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
Monitoring frequency |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
|||
Quality control |
As used in the reported monitroing method.
|
As used in the reported monitroing method.
|
As used in the reported monitroing method.
|
Data management |
|||
Data access |
|||
Related indicator/name |
|||
Contact |
|||
References |