Member State report / Art11 / 2020 / D1-P / Croatia / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Pelagic habitats |
| Member State | Croatia |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea |
| Reported by | Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries |
| Report date | 2020-10-15 |
| Report access |
Descriptor |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
D1.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
Plankton communities are monitored to assess environmental status and distance from GES in the pelagic habitat. State of the habitat is evaluated through the state of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, using appropriate biodiversity-based (taxonomical structure) and stock size-based (abundance, biomass) indicators relevant for those elements under D1C6 criterion. The assessment areas include coastal and open-sea waters, particularly those under increased anthropogenic pressures that might induce undesirable changes in plankton communities: eutrophication, resulting in elevated nutrient concentrations that promote accelerated phytoplankton growth, proliferation of opportunistic species and changes in the food web structure; fisheries, that through excessive species extraction impacts the structure of apex predators; introduction of non-indigenous species, which changes local communities through competitive advancement of alien species. Through the monitoring results, deviations in plankton diversity, relative abundance or biomass from the natural ranges (baselines) that can be backtracked to human-induced pressures will be recognized as impediments to GES achievement. Monitoring strategy is expected to contribute to the assessment of progress towards the achievement of the main GES targets for the pelagic habitat. |
Plankton communities are monitored to assess environmental status and distance from GES in the pelagic habitat. State of the habitat is evaluated through the state of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, using appropriate biodiversity-based (taxonomical structure) and stock size-based (abundance, biomass) indicators relevant for those elements under D1C6 criterion. The assessment areas include coastal and open-sea waters, particularly those under increased anthropogenic pressures that might induce undesirable changes in plankton communities: eutrophication, resulting in elevated nutrient concentrations that promote accelerated phytoplankton growth, proliferation of opportunistic species and changes in the food web structure; fisheries, that through excessive species extraction impacts the structure of apex predators; introduction of non-indigenous species, which changes local communities through competitive advancement of alien species. Through the monitoring results, deviations in plankton diversity, relative abundance or biomass from the natural ranges (baselines) that can be backtracked to human-induced pressures will be recognized as impediments to GES achievement. Monitoring strategy is expected to contribute to the assessment of progress towards the achievement of the main GES targets for the pelagic habitat. |
Plankton communities are monitored to assess environmental status and distance from GES in the pelagic habitat. State of the habitat is evaluated through the state of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, using appropriate biodiversity-based (taxonomical structure) and stock size-based (abundance, biomass) indicators relevant for those elements under D1C6 criterion. The assessment areas include coastal and open-sea waters, particularly those under increased anthropogenic pressures that might induce undesirable changes in plankton communities: eutrophication, resulting in elevated nutrient concentrations that promote accelerated phytoplankton growth, proliferation of opportunistic species and changes in the food web structure; fisheries, that through excessive species extraction impacts the structure of apex predators; introduction of non-indigenous species, which changes local communities through competitive advancement of alien species. Through the monitoring results, deviations in plankton diversity, relative abundance or biomass from the natural ranges (baselines) that can be backtracked to human-induced pressures will be recognized as impediments to GES achievement. Monitoring strategy is expected to contribute to the assessment of progress towards the achievement of the main GES targets for the pelagic habitat. |
Plankton communities are monitored to assess environmental status and distance from GES in the pelagic habitat. State of the habitat is evaluated through the state of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, using appropriate biodiversity-based (taxonomical structure) and stock size-based (abundance, biomass) indicators relevant for those elements under D1C6 criterion. The assessment areas include coastal and open-sea waters, particularly those under increased anthropogenic pressures that might induce undesirable changes in plankton communities: eutrophication, resulting in elevated nutrient concentrations that promote accelerated phytoplankton growth, proliferation of opportunistic species and changes in the food web structure; fisheries, that through excessive species extraction impacts the structure of apex predators; introduction of non-indigenous species, which changes local communities through competitive advancement of alien species. Through the monitoring results, deviations in plankton diversity, relative abundance or biomass from the natural ranges (baselines) that can be backtracked to human-induced pressures will be recognized as impediments to GES achievement. Monitoring strategy is expected to contribute to the assessment of progress towards the achievement of the main GES targets for the pelagic habitat. |
Plankton communities are monitored to assess environmental status and distance from GES in the pelagic habitat. State of the habitat is evaluated through the state of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, using appropriate biodiversity-based (taxonomical structure) and stock size-based (abundance, biomass) indicators relevant for those elements under D1C6 criterion. The assessment areas include coastal and open-sea waters, particularly those under increased anthropogenic pressures that might induce undesirable changes in plankton communities: eutrophication, resulting in elevated nutrient concentrations that promote accelerated phytoplankton growth, proliferation of opportunistic species and changes in the food web structure; fisheries, that through excessive species extraction impacts the structure of apex predators; introduction of non-indigenous species, which changes local communities through competitive advancement of alien species. Through the monitoring results, deviations in plankton diversity, relative abundance or biomass from the natural ranges (baselines) that can be backtracked to human-induced pressures will be recognized as impediments to GES achievement. Monitoring strategy is expected to contribute to the assessment of progress towards the achievement of the main GES targets for the pelagic habitat. |
Plankton communities are monitored to assess environmental status and distance from GES in the pelagic habitat. State of the habitat is evaluated through the state of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, using appropriate biodiversity-based (taxonomical structure) and stock size-based (abundance, biomass) indicators relevant for those elements under D1C6 criterion. The assessment areas include coastal and open-sea waters, particularly those under increased anthropogenic pressures that might induce undesirable changes in plankton communities: eutrophication, resulting in elevated nutrient concentrations that promote accelerated phytoplankton growth, proliferation of opportunistic species and changes in the food web structure; fisheries, that through excessive species extraction impacts the structure of apex predators; introduction of non-indigenous species, which changes local communities through competitive advancement of alien species. Through the monitoring results, deviations in plankton diversity, relative abundance or biomass from the natural ranges (baselines) that can be backtracked to human-induced pressures will be recognized as impediments to GES achievement. Monitoring strategy is expected to contribute to the assessment of progress towards the achievement of the main GES targets for the pelagic habitat. |
Plankton communities are monitored to assess environmental status and distance from GES in the pelagic habitat. State of the habitat is evaluated through the state of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, using appropriate biodiversity-based (taxonomical structure) and stock size-based (abundance, biomass) indicators relevant for those elements under D1C6 criterion. The assessment areas include coastal and open-sea waters, particularly those under increased anthropogenic pressures that might induce undesirable changes in plankton communities: eutrophication, resulting in elevated nutrient concentrations that promote accelerated phytoplankton growth, proliferation of opportunistic species and changes in the food web structure; fisheries, that through excessive species extraction impacts the structure of apex predators; introduction of non-indigenous species, which changes local communities through competitive advancement of alien species. Through the monitoring results, deviations in plankton diversity, relative abundance or biomass from the natural ranges (baselines) that can be backtracked to human-induced pressures will be recognized as impediments to GES achievement. Monitoring strategy is expected to contribute to the assessment of progress towards the achievement of the main GES targets for the pelagic habitat. |
Plankton communities are monitored to assess environmental status and distance from GES in the pelagic habitat. State of the habitat is evaluated through the state of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, using appropriate biodiversity-based (taxonomical structure) and stock size-based (abundance, biomass) indicators relevant for those elements under D1C6 criterion. The assessment areas include coastal and open-sea waters, particularly those under increased anthropogenic pressures that might induce undesirable changes in plankton communities: eutrophication, resulting in elevated nutrient concentrations that promote accelerated phytoplankton growth, proliferation of opportunistic species and changes in the food web structure; fisheries, that through excessive species extraction impacts the structure of apex predators; introduction of non-indigenous species, which changes local communities through competitive advancement of alien species. Through the monitoring results, deviations in plankton diversity, relative abundance or biomass from the natural ranges (baselines) that can be backtracked to human-induced pressures will be recognized as impediments to GES achievement. Monitoring strategy is expected to contribute to the assessment of progress towards the achievement of the main GES targets for the pelagic habitat. |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Gaps and plans |
Spatial and temporal resolution of plankton monitoring might be increased by the use of automated methods for plankton enumeration and analyses. Due to high diversity and complex life-cycles, there is need to constantly update and expand taxonomical knowledge on plankton. The upgrades are expected from creating the subregional/regional experts network and from exploiting the recent advancements in integrative taxonomy, using genomic methods that could provide faster results and complement the traditional plankton analyses. |
Spatial and temporal resolution of plankton monitoring might be increased by the use of automated methods for plankton enumeration and analyses. Due to high diversity and complex life-cycles, there is need to constantly update and expand taxonomical knowledge on plankton. The upgrades are expected from creating the subregional/regional experts network and from exploiting the recent advancements in integrative taxonomy, using genomic methods that could provide faster results and complement the traditional plankton analyses. |
Spatial and temporal resolution of plankton monitoring might be increased by the use of automated methods for plankton enumeration and analyses. Due to high diversity and complex life-cycles, there is need to constantly update and expand taxonomical knowledge on plankton. The upgrades are expected from creating the subregional/regional experts network and from exploiting the recent advancements in integrative taxonomy, using genomic methods that could provide faster results and complement the traditional plankton analyses. |
Spatial and temporal resolution of plankton monitoring might be increased by the use of automated methods for plankton enumeration and analyses. Due to high diversity and complex life-cycles, there is need to constantly update and expand taxonomical knowledge on plankton. The upgrades are expected from creating the subregional/regional experts network and from exploiting the recent advancements in integrative taxonomy, using genomic methods that could provide faster results and complement the traditional plankton analyses. |
Spatial and temporal resolution of plankton monitoring might be increased by the use of automated methods for plankton enumeration and analyses. Due to high diversity and complex life-cycles, there is need to constantly update and expand taxonomical knowledge on plankton. The upgrades are expected from creating the subregional/regional experts network and from exploiting the recent advancements in integrative taxonomy, using genomic methods that could provide faster results and complement the traditional plankton analyses. |
Spatial and temporal resolution of plankton monitoring might be increased by the use of automated methods for plankton enumeration and analyses. Due to high diversity and complex life-cycles, there is need to constantly update and expand taxonomical knowledge on plankton. The upgrades are expected from creating the subregional/regional experts network and from exploiting the recent advancements in integrative taxonomy, using genomic methods that could provide faster results and complement the traditional plankton analyses. |
Spatial and temporal resolution of plankton monitoring might be increased by the use of automated methods for plankton enumeration and analyses. Due to high diversity and complex life-cycles, there is need to constantly update and expand taxonomical knowledge on plankton. The upgrades are expected from creating the subregional/regional experts network and from exploiting the recent advancements in integrative taxonomy, using genomic methods that could provide faster results and complement the traditional plankton analyses. |
Spatial and temporal resolution of plankton monitoring might be increased by the use of automated methods for plankton enumeration and analyses. Due to high diversity and complex life-cycles, there is need to constantly update and expand taxonomical knowledge on plankton. The upgrades are expected from creating the subregional/regional experts network and from exploiting the recent advancements in integrative taxonomy, using genomic methods that could provide faster results and complement the traditional plankton analyses. |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Related measures |
||||||||
Coverage of measures |
||||||||
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
Programme name |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Update type |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme description |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
||||||||
Monitoring details |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Features |
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES criteria |
D1C6 |
D4C1 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D4C2 |
D4C4 |
D4C4 |
D5C3 |
Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parameter Other |
Abundance/Biomass, species composition |
Species composition |
Species composition |
|||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
Monitoring frequency |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Quality control |
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
Data management |
||||||||
Data access |
||||||||
Related indicator/name |
||||||||
Contact |
||||||||
References |