Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Croatia / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
Member State | Croatia |
Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea |
Reported by | Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries |
Report date | 2019-10-31 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART8_GES_HR.xml |
MAD-HR-MRU_1
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Pecten jacobeus |
Pecten jacobeus |
Pecten jacobeus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Spicara smaris |
Element code |
126426 |
126426 |
126426 |
126484 |
126484 |
126484 |
126985 |
126985 |
126985 |
126986 |
126986 |
126986 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
140711 |
140711 |
140711 |
126421 |
126421 |
126421 |
126830 |
126830 |
126830 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
Stock of Engraulis encrasicolus in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Engraulis encrasicolus in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Engraulis encrasicolus in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Merluccius merluccius in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Merluccius merluccius in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Merluccius merluccius in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Mullus barbatus in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Mullus barbatus in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Mullus barbatus in GSA17&18
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Stock of Nephrops norvegicus in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Nephrops norvegicus in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Nephrops norvegicus in GSA17&18
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Stock of Sardina pilchardus in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Sardina pilchardus in GSA17&18
|
Stock of Sardina pilchardus in GSA17&18
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Element 2 code |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Parameter other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes, based on low risk |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes, based on low risk |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Good, based on low risk |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good, based on low risk |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Good, based on low risk |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good, based on low risk |
Description criteria |
Fishing mortality rate based on stock assessment that was done for the whole Adriatic sea (GSA 17 + GSA 18) hasn''t reached GES, but on the level of eastern Adriatic (Croatian territorial waters) GES is reached for this criterion. |
Spawning stock biomass based on stock assessment that was done for the whole Adriatic sea (GSA 17 + GSA 18) hasn''t reached GES, but on the level of eastern Adriatic (Croatian territorial waters) GES is reached for this criterion. |
In Croatian territorial waters Population age/size distribution is in good status. |
Fishing mortality rate based on stock assessment that was done for the whole Adriatic sea (GSA 17 + GSA 18) hasn''t reached GES, but on the level of eastern Adriatic (Croatian territorial waters) GES is reached for this criterion. |
Spawning stock biomass based on stock assessment that was done for the whole Adriatic sea (GSA 17 + GSA 18) hasn''t reached GES, but on the level of eastern Adriatic (Croatian territorial waters) GES is reached for this criterion. |
In Croatian territorial waters Population age/size distribution is in good status. |
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed. |
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed. |
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed. |
This criterion coudn''t be defined since biological data are collected during last two years. |
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed. |
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed. |
|||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data. |
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data.
|
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Element status couldn''t be defined since biological data are collected during last two years. |
Element status couldn''t be defined since biological data are collected during last two years. |
Element status couldn''t be defined since biological data are collected during last two years. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed. |
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data. |
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data.
|
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
Description overall status |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent. |
Assessments period |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
2013-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |