Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Croatia / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D3 Commercial fish and shellfish
Member State Croatia
Region/subregion Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
Reported by Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries
Report date 2019-10-31
Report access msfd2018-ART8_GES_HR.xml

MAD-HR-MRU_1

GES component
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
Feature
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element
Engraulis encrasicolus
Engraulis encrasicolus
Engraulis encrasicolus
Merluccius merluccius
Merluccius merluccius
Merluccius merluccius
Mullus barbatus
Mullus barbatus
Mullus barbatus
Mullus surmuletus
Mullus surmuletus
Mullus surmuletus
Nephrops norvegicus
Nephrops norvegicus
Nephrops norvegicus
Pecten jacobeus
Pecten jacobeus
Pecten jacobeus
Sardina pilchardus
Sardina pilchardus
Sardina pilchardus
Spicara smaris
Spicara smaris
Spicara smaris
Element code
126426
126426
126426
126484
126484
126484
126985
126985
126985
126986
126986
126986
107254
107254
107254
140711
140711
140711
126421
126421
126421
126830
126830
126830
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
Stock of Engraulis encrasicolus in GSA17&18
Stock of Engraulis encrasicolus in GSA17&18
Stock of Engraulis encrasicolus in GSA17&18
Stock of Merluccius merluccius in GSA17&18
Stock of Merluccius merluccius in GSA17&18
Stock of Merluccius merluccius in GSA17&18
Stock of Mullus barbatus in GSA17&18
Stock of Mullus barbatus in GSA17&18
Stock of Mullus barbatus in GSA17&18
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stock of Nephrops norvegicus in GSA17&18
Stock of Nephrops norvegicus in GSA17&18
Stock of Nephrops norvegicus in GSA17&18
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stock of Sardina pilchardus in GSA17&18
Stock of Sardina pilchardus in GSA17&18
Stock of Sardina pilchardus in GSA17&18
N/A
N/A
N/A
Element 2 code
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Element 2 code source
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element source
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Criterion
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Size distribution
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Size distribution
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Size distribution
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Size distribution
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Size distribution
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Size distribution
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Size distribution
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Size distribution
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Parameter achieved
Yes
Yes
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes, based on low risk
Unknown
Unknown
Yes, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Not assessed
Not assessed
Yes
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not good
Not good
Good, based on low risk
Not good
Not good
Good
Not good
Not good
Good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Not good
Not good
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Description criteria
Fishing mortality rate based on stock assessment that was done for the whole Adriatic sea (GSA 17 + GSA 18) hasn''t reached GES, but on the level of eastern Adriatic (Croatian territorial waters) GES is reached for this criterion.
Spawning stock biomass based on stock assessment that was done for the whole Adriatic sea (GSA 17 + GSA 18) hasn''t reached GES, but on the level of eastern Adriatic (Croatian territorial waters) GES is reached for this criterion.
In Croatian territorial waters Population age/size distribution is in good status.
Fishing mortality rate based on stock assessment that was done for the whole Adriatic sea (GSA 17 + GSA 18) hasn''t reached GES, but on the level of eastern Adriatic (Croatian territorial waters) GES is reached for this criterion.
Spawning stock biomass based on stock assessment that was done for the whole Adriatic sea (GSA 17 + GSA 18) hasn''t reached GES, but on the level of eastern Adriatic (Croatian territorial waters) GES is reached for this criterion.
In Croatian territorial waters Population age/size distribution is in good status.
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed.
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed.
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed.
This criterion coudn''t be defined since biological data are collected during last two years.
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed.
Due to lack of data this criterion is not assessed.
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data.
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data.
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Element status couldn''t be defined since biological data are collected during last two years.
Element status couldn''t be defined since biological data are collected during last two years.
Element status couldn''t be defined since biological data are collected during last two years.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Due to implementation of new management measures in recent years improvement of the stock in the Croatian territorial waters is noticed.
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data.
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data.
Element status coudn''t be defined due to lack of crucial biological data.
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
GES expected to be achieved by 2020
Description overall status
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
All stocks, which biomass is assessed throughout the bodies of GFCM or STECF, are shared among all the countries that are on the Adriatic coast. Those species are migratory and defining the amount (in %) of the stock that we consider to be in good shape is not possible, precisely this wouldn’t be scientifically correct percent.
Assessments period
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
2013-2018
Related pressures
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
Related targets