Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D5 / Croatia / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D5 Eutrophication |
| Member State | Croatia |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea |
| Reported by | Institute for Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia |
| Report date | 2014-09-04; 2020-10-15 |
| Report access |
2014 data
2020 data
| Monitoring programme | Monitoring programme name | MP_D5 |
MP_D5 |
MP_D5 |
MP_D5 |
MP_D5 |
MP_D5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring programme | Reference existing programme | MADHR-D05 |
MADHR-D05 |
MADHR-D05 |
MADHR-D05 |
MADHR-D05 |
MADHR-D05 |
| Monitoring programme | Marine Unit ID |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q4e - Programme ID | MADHR-D05 |
MADHR-D05 |
MADHR-D05 |
MADHR-D05 |
MADHR-D05 |
MADHR-D05 |
|
| Q4f - Programme description | Over the past century in the area of Croatian waters along the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea, there was an increase in intensity of human activities. This resulted in an increase of various types of pressures on the marine environment, especially the load of nutrients to the marine ecosystem.
The status of eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is well known and so far it has been monitored systematically for the needs of the WFD. According to this it can be briefly summarized as follows: The ecological status of the Croatian coastal sea from the standpoint of eutrophication is very good, ie of the highest degree. Only exceptions where increasing eutrophication was recorded, and thereby a reduction of the ecological status was observed were in the Limski kanal, Bakar, Šibenik and part of the Kaštela bay. |
Over the past century in the area of Croatian waters along the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea, there was an increase in intensity of human activities. This resulted in an increase of various types of pressures on the marine environment, especially the load of nutrients to the marine ecosystem.
The status of eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is well known and so far it has been monitored systematically for the needs of the WFD. According to this it can be briefly summarized as follows: The ecological status of the Croatian coastal sea from the standpoint of eutrophication is very good, ie of the highest degree. Only exceptions where increasing eutrophication was recorded, and thereby a reduction of the ecological status was observed were in the Limski kanal, Bakar, Šibenik and part of the Kaštela bay. |
Over the past century in the area of Croatian waters along the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea, there was an increase in intensity of human activities. This resulted in an increase of various types of pressures on the marine environment, especially the load of nutrients to the marine ecosystem.
The status of eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is well known and so far it has been monitored systematically for the needs of the WFD. According to this it can be briefly summarized as follows: The ecological status of the Croatian coastal sea from the standpoint of eutrophication is very good, ie of the highest degree. Only exceptions where increasing eutrophication was recorded, and thereby a reduction of the ecological status was observed were in the Limski kanal, Bakar, Šibenik and part of the Kaštela bay. |
Over the past century in the area of Croatian waters along the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea, there was an increase in intensity of human activities. This resulted in an increase of various types of pressures on the marine environment, especially the load of nutrients to the marine ecosystem.
The status of eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is well known and so far it has been monitored systematically for the needs of the WFD. According to this it can be briefly summarized as follows: The ecological status of the Croatian coastal sea from the standpoint of eutrophication is very good, ie of the highest degree. Only exceptions where increasing eutrophication was recorded, and thereby a reduction of the ecological status was observed were in the Limski kanal, Bakar, Šibenik and part of the Kaštela bay. |
Over the past century in the area of Croatian waters along the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea, there was an increase in intensity of human activities. This resulted in an increase of various types of pressures on the marine environment, especially the load of nutrients to the marine ecosystem.
The status of eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is well known and so far it has been monitored systematically for the needs of the WFD. According to this it can be briefly summarized as follows: The ecological status of the Croatian coastal sea from the standpoint of eutrophication is very good, ie of the highest degree. Only exceptions where increasing eutrophication was recorded, and thereby a reduction of the ecological status was observed were in the Limski kanal, Bakar, Šibenik and part of the Kaštela bay. |
Over the past century in the area of Croatian waters along the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea, there was an increase in intensity of human activities. This resulted in an increase of various types of pressures on the marine environment, especially the load of nutrients to the marine ecosystem.
The status of eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is well known and so far it has been monitored systematically for the needs of the WFD. According to this it can be briefly summarized as follows: The ecological status of the Croatian coastal sea from the standpoint of eutrophication is very good, ie of the highest degree. Only exceptions where increasing eutrophication was recorded, and thereby a reduction of the ecological status was observed were in the Limski kanal, Bakar, Šibenik and part of the Kaštela bay. |
|
| Q5e - Natural variability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate data | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Established methods | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate capacity | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment | According to the initial assessment, eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. The ecological status of this part of the Adriatic is in its most part very good, that is of the highest quality. Initial assessment agrees with the condition that was found during the implementation of the WFD. This is primarily because the most of the coastal waters defined under WFD coincides with the ones defined in MSFD due to indented coastline and notable insular system. Good condition of the ecosystem, from the standpoint of eutrophication, was observed only in the Limski kanal, Pula, Rijeka and Split harbour and the Bakar Bay. The worst situation was observed in the area of Šibenik bay where it is close to moderate. These are all areas under significant anthropogenic influence, mainly because of unresolved urban wastewater drainage system. Although in all these areas these systems are under construction or are newly constructed and a significant reduction in the degree of eutrophication is expected in the upcoming years. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
According to the initial assessment, eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. The ecological status of this part of the Adriatic is in its most part very good, that is of the highest quality. Initial assessment agrees with the condition that was found during the implementation of the WFD. This is primarily because the most of the coastal waters defined under WFD coincides with the ones defined in MSFD due to indented coastline and notable insular system. Good condition of the ecosystem, from the standpoint of eutrophication, was observed only in the Limski kanal, Pula, Rijeka and Split harbour and the Bakar Bay. The worst situation was observed in the area of Šibenik bay where it is close to moderate. These are all areas under significant anthropogenic influence, mainly because of unresolved urban wastewater drainage system. Although in all these areas these systems are under construction or are newly constructed and a significant reduction in the degree of eutrophication is expected in the upcoming years. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
According to the initial assessment, eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. The ecological status of this part of the Adriatic is in its most part very good, that is of the highest quality. Initial assessment agrees with the condition that was found during the implementation of the WFD. This is primarily because the most of the coastal waters defined under WFD coincides with the ones defined in MSFD due to indented coastline and notable insular system. Good condition of the ecosystem, from the standpoint of eutrophication, was observed only in the Limski kanal, Pula, Rijeka and Split harbour and the Bakar Bay. The worst situation was observed in the area of Šibenik bay where it is close to moderate. These are all areas under significant anthropogenic influence, mainly because of unresolved urban wastewater drainage system. Although in all these areas these systems are under construction or are newly constructed and a significant reduction in the degree of eutrophication is expected in the upcoming years. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
According to the initial assessment, eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. The ecological status of this part of the Adriatic is in its most part very good, that is of the highest quality. Initial assessment agrees with the condition that was found during the implementation of the WFD. This is primarily because the most of the coastal waters defined under WFD coincides with the ones defined in MSFD due to indented coastline and notable insular system. Good condition of the ecosystem, from the standpoint of eutrophication, was observed only in the Limski kanal, Pula, Rijeka and Split harbour and the Bakar Bay. The worst situation was observed in the area of Šibenik bay where it is close to moderate. These are all areas under significant anthropogenic influence, mainly because of unresolved urban wastewater drainage system. Although in all these areas these systems are under construction or are newly constructed and a significant reduction in the degree of eutrophication is expected in the upcoming years. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
According to the initial assessment, eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. The ecological status of this part of the Adriatic is in its most part very good, that is of the highest quality. Initial assessment agrees with the condition that was found during the implementation of the WFD. This is primarily because the most of the coastal waters defined under WFD coincides with the ones defined in MSFD due to indented coastline and notable insular system. Good condition of the ecosystem, from the standpoint of eutrophication, was observed only in the Limski kanal, Pula, Rijeka and Split harbour and the Bakar Bay. The worst situation was observed in the area of Šibenik bay where it is close to moderate. These are all areas under significant anthropogenic influence, mainly because of unresolved urban wastewater drainage system. Although in all these areas these systems are under construction or are newly constructed and a significant reduction in the degree of eutrophication is expected in the upcoming years. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
According to the initial assessment, eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. The ecological status of this part of the Adriatic is in its most part very good, that is of the highest quality. Initial assessment agrees with the condition that was found during the implementation of the WFD. This is primarily because the most of the coastal waters defined under WFD coincides with the ones defined in MSFD due to indented coastline and notable insular system. Good condition of the ecosystem, from the standpoint of eutrophication, was observed only in the Limski kanal, Pula, Rijeka and Split harbour and the Bakar Bay. The worst situation was observed in the area of Šibenik bay where it is close to moderate. These are all areas under significant anthropogenic influence, mainly because of unresolved urban wastewater drainage system. Although in all these areas these systems are under construction or are newly constructed and a significant reduction in the degree of eutrophication is expected in the upcoming years. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
|
| Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment | By2018 |
By2018 |
By2018 |
By2018 |
By2018 |
By2018 |
|
| Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment | |||||||
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Environmental target | ||||||
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Associated indicator | ||||||
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_SuitableData | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_EstablishedMethods | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6d_AdequateCapacity | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q6c - Target updating | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
| Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment | Assessment of eutrophication for the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is based on conclusions and proposals of the MSFD TG5. Assessment for indicator 5.2.1 (Concentration of chlorophylla in the water column) is based on the work of a group of Italian, Slovenian and Croatian experts as a common approach to the assessment of the condition of the Biological Quality Element (BQE) - Phytoplankton for WFD and an effort to develop common criteria at the Adriatic level. |
Assessment of eutrophication for the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is based on conclusions and proposals of the MSFD TG5. Assessment for indicator 5.2.1 (Concentration of chlorophylla in the water column) is based on the work of a group of Italian, Slovenian and Croatian experts as a common approach to the assessment of the condition of the Biological Quality Element (BQE) - Phytoplankton for WFD and an effort to develop common criteria at the Adriatic level. |
Assessment of eutrophication for the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is based on conclusions and proposals of the MSFD TG5. Assessment for indicator 5.2.1 (Concentration of chlorophylla in the water column) is based on the work of a group of Italian, Slovenian and Croatian experts as a common approach to the assessment of the condition of the Biological Quality Element (BQE) - Phytoplankton for WFD and an effort to develop common criteria at the Adriatic level. |
Assessment of eutrophication for the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is based on conclusions and proposals of the MSFD TG5. Assessment for indicator 5.2.1 (Concentration of chlorophylla in the water column) is based on the work of a group of Italian, Slovenian and Croatian experts as a common approach to the assessment of the condition of the Biological Quality Element (BQE) - Phytoplankton for WFD and an effort to develop common criteria at the Adriatic level. |
Assessment of eutrophication for the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is based on conclusions and proposals of the MSFD TG5. Assessment for indicator 5.2.1 (Concentration of chlorophylla in the water column) is based on the work of a group of Italian, Slovenian and Croatian experts as a common approach to the assessment of the condition of the Biological Quality Element (BQE) - Phytoplankton for WFD and an effort to develop common criteria at the Adriatic level. |
Assessment of eutrophication for the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is based on conclusions and proposals of the MSFD TG5. Assessment for indicator 5.2.1 (Concentration of chlorophylla in the water column) is based on the work of a group of Italian, Slovenian and Croatian experts as a common approach to the assessment of the condition of the Biological Quality Element (BQE) - Phytoplankton for WFD and an effort to develop common criteria at the Adriatic level. |
|
| Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment | By2018 |
By2018 |
By2018 |
By2018 |
By2018 |
By2018 |
|
| Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment | |||||||
| Q7a - Relevant activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities | Indicator 5.2.4. (Changes in the floristic composition of species such as the ratio between diatoms and dinoflagellates, changes in the benthic pelagic species, as well as the occurrence of harmful/toxic algal blooms (such as cyanobacteria) caused by human activity) is one of the most important problems for eutrophication since it indicates the environmental dimension of the descriptor. Unfortunately, its complexity, methodological problems and high costs represent a significant limitation in its usability. In this regard, further research is needed to define a usable multimetric index as indicator. |
Indicator 5.2.4. (Changes in the floristic composition of species such as the ratio between diatoms and dinoflagellates, changes in the benthic pelagic species, as well as the occurrence of harmful/toxic algal blooms (such as cyanobacteria) caused by human activity) is one of the most important problems for eutrophication since it indicates the environmental dimension of the descriptor. Unfortunately, its complexity, methodological problems and high costs represent a significant limitation in its usability. In this regard, further research is needed to define a usable multimetric index as indicator. |
Indicator 5.2.4. (Changes in the floristic composition of species such as the ratio between diatoms and dinoflagellates, changes in the benthic pelagic species, as well as the occurrence of harmful/toxic algal blooms (such as cyanobacteria) caused by human activity) is one of the most important problems for eutrophication since it indicates the environmental dimension of the descriptor. Unfortunately, its complexity, methodological problems and high costs represent a significant limitation in its usability. In this regard, further research is needed to define a usable multimetric index as indicator. |
Indicator 5.2.4. (Changes in the floristic composition of species such as the ratio between diatoms and dinoflagellates, changes in the benthic pelagic species, as well as the occurrence of harmful/toxic algal blooms (such as cyanobacteria) caused by human activity) is one of the most important problems for eutrophication since it indicates the environmental dimension of the descriptor. Unfortunately, its complexity, methodological problems and high costs represent a significant limitation in its usability. In this regard, further research is needed to define a usable multimetric index as indicator. |
Indicator 5.2.4. (Changes in the floristic composition of species such as the ratio between diatoms and dinoflagellates, changes in the benthic pelagic species, as well as the occurrence of harmful/toxic algal blooms (such as cyanobacteria) caused by human activity) is one of the most important problems for eutrophication since it indicates the environmental dimension of the descriptor. Unfortunately, its complexity, methodological problems and high costs represent a significant limitation in its usability. In this regard, further research is needed to define a usable multimetric index as indicator. |
Indicator 5.2.4. (Changes in the floristic composition of species such as the ratio between diatoms and dinoflagellates, changes in the benthic pelagic species, as well as the occurrence of harmful/toxic algal blooms (such as cyanobacteria) caused by human activity) is one of the most important problems for eutrophication since it indicates the environmental dimension of the descriptor. Unfortunately, its complexity, methodological problems and high costs represent a significant limitation in its usability. In this regard, further research is needed to define a usable multimetric index as indicator. |
|
| Q7c - Relevant measures | |||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate data | ||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Established methods | ||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES | ||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate capacity | ||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures | ||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures | ||||||
| Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures | |||||||
| Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures | By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
|
| Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme ID | MADHR-D05-01 |
MADHR-D05-02 |
MADHR-D05-03 |
MADHR-D05-04 |
MADHR-D05-05 |
MADHR-D05-06 |
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme name | Nutrient levels - in water column |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme ID | MADHR-D05-01 |
MADHR-D05-02 |
MADHR-D05-03 |
MADHR-D05-04 |
MADHR-D05-05 |
MADHR-D05-06 |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme name | Nutrient levels - in water column |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
| Q4k - Monitoring purpose | Pressurse |
Pressurse |
Pressurse Activities |
Pressurse Activities |
Pressurse Activities |
Pressurse Activities |
|
| Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions | Monitoring for requirements of Water Framework Directive with survey in coastal and transitional waters through National monitoring program contributes to MSFD program. |
Monitoring for requirements of Water Framework Directive with survey in coastal and transitional waters through National monitoring program contribute to MSFD program. |
Monitoring for requirements of Water Framework Directive with survey in coastal and transitional waters through National monitoring program contributes to MSFD program. |
Monitoring for requirements of Water Framework Directive with survey in coastal and transitional waters through National monitoring program contributes to MSFD program. |
Monitoring for requirements of Water Framework Directive with survey in coastal and transitional waters through National monitoring program contribute to MSFD program. |
Monitoring for requirements of Water Framework Directive with survey in coastal and transitional waters through National monitoring program contribute to MSFD program. |
|
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Habitats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Species list |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Physical/Chemical features |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q9a - Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5a - GES criteria | Relevant GES criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5b - GES indicators | Relevant GES indicators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species distribution |
|
|
||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population size |
|
|||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population characteristics | ||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species impacts | ||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat distribution |
|
|
||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat extent |
|
|
||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (physical-chemical) |
|
|||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (biological) |
|
|
||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat impacts | ||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure input |
|
|||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure output |
|
|||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) | Activity | ||||||
| Q9b Parameters monitored (other) | Other | ||||||
| Q41 Spatial scope | WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
|
| Q4j - Description of spatial scope | Eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. Areas under significant anthropogenic influence have unresolved urban waste water drainage system. Eutrophication parameters will be measured in the central and south Adriatic at selected stations along the Dubrovnik - Bari, Split - Gargano, Šibenik - Ortona profiles and in the northern part of the Po River Delta - Rovinj. In the coastal area areas that are normally under anthropogenic load are selected: Neretva Delta, Kaštela, Rijeka and Bakar Bay and the west coast of Istria. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
Eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. Areas under significant anthropogenic influence have unresolved urban waste water drainage system. Eutrophication parameters will be measured in the central and south Adriatic at selected stations along the Dubrovnik - Bari, Split - Gargano, Šibenik - Ortona profiles and in the northern part of the Po River Delta - Rovinj. In the coastal area areas that are normally under anthropogenic load are selected: Neretva Delta, Kaštela, Rijeka and Bakar Bay and the west coast of Istria. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
Eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. Areas under significant anthropogenic influence have unresolved urban waste water drainage system. Eutrophication parameters will be measured in the central and south Adriatic at selected stations along the Dubrovnik - Bari, Split - Gargano, Šibenik - Ortona profiles and in the northern part of the Po River Delta - Rovinj. In the coastal area areas that are normally under anthropogenic load are selected: Neretva Delta, Kaštela, Rijeka and Bakar Bay and the west coast of Istria. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
Eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. Areas under significant anthropogenic influence have unresolved urban waste water drainage system. Eutrophication parameters will be measured in the central and south Adriatic at selected stations along the Dubrovnik - Bari, Split - Gargano, Šibenik - Ortona profiles and in the northern part of the Po River Delta - Rovinj. In the coastal area areas that are normally under anthropogenic load are selected: Neretva Delta, Kaštela, Rijeka and Bakar Bay and the west coast of Istria. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
Eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. Areas under significant anthropogenic influence have unresolved urban waste water drainage system. Eutrophication parameters will be measured in the central and south Adriatic at selected stations along the Dubrovnik - Bari, Split - Gargano, Šibenik - Ortona profiles and in the northern part of the Po River Delta - Rovinj. In the coastal area areas that are normally under anthropogenic load are selected: Neretva Delta, Kaštela, Rijeka and Bakar Bay and the west coast of Istria. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
Eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. Areas under significant anthropogenic influence have unresolved urban waste water drainage system. Eutrophication parameters will be measured in the central and south Adriatic at selected stations along the Dubrovnik - Bari, Split - Gargano, Šibenik - Ortona profiles and in the northern part of the Po River Delta - Rovinj. In the coastal area areas that are normally under anthropogenic load are selected: Neretva Delta, Kaštela, Rijeka and Bakar Bay and the west coast of Istria. Particularly interesting areas are Limski kanal and Bakar Bay, which are partly under the influence of natural eutrophication and its anthropogenic component. |
|
| Marine Unit IDs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q4h - Temporal scope | Start date- End date | 1998-9999 |
1998-9999 |
2009-9999 |
2009-9999 |
1998-9999 |
1998-9999 |
| Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q9c - Monitoring method | Determination of nutrient concentrations in seawater samples (Grasshoff, K.: Methods of Seawater Analysis, Verlag Chemie, New
York, 307 pp.)
Determination of the oxygen concentration in seawater samples (Grasshoff, K.: Methods of Seawater Analysis, Verlag Chemie, New
York, 307 pp.)
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr) |
Strickland, J.D.H., Parsons, T.R., 1972. A practical handbook of seawater analysis. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 167, 1–310.
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr) |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr) |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr) |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr) |
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasović I., Krstulović, N., Leder, N., Lončar, G., Precali, R., Šolić, M., Lončar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanić, N., Cvitković, I., Dadić, V., Despalatović, M., Dulčić, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilić, G., Ninčević-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujević, I., Vrgoč, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljević, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr) |
|
| Q9d - Description of alteration to method | |||||||
| Q9e - Quality assurance |
|
|
|||||
| Q9f - Quality control | DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
|
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - Proportion of area covered % | ||||||
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - No. of samples | 110 samples per year |
|||||
| Q9i - Description of sample representivity | No variation within the sub-programme. |
No variation within the sub-programme. |
No variation within the sub-programme. |
No variation within the sub-programme. |
No variation within the sub-programme. |
No variation within the sub-programme. |
|
| Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data | |||||||
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data type | DataProducts |
DataProducts |
DataProducts |
DataProducts |
DataProducts |
DataProducts |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access mechanism | LocationNationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access rights | Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - INSPIRE standard | SeaRegions |
SeaRegions |
SeaRegions |
SeaRegions |
SeaRegions |
SeaRegions |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c Date data are available | 2018-10 |
2018-10 |
2018-10 |
2018-10 |
2018-10 |
2018-10 |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data update frequency | Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
| Q10d - Description of data access | In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development. |
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development. |
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development. |
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development. |
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development. |
In accordance to the Regulation on development and implementation of documents of Strategy for Management of Marine and Coastal Areas (O.G. 112/14), Croatian Environment Agency is in charge of developing Marine Information System. Data and information regarding all elements of the Strategy collected by competent authorities should be available for needs of the System. The System is still under development. |
|
Descriptor |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for eutrophication are agriculture and livestock, aquaculture, fishery and tourism. As a pressure of these activities, nutrienst concentration were measured, while microalgal biomass and oxygen concentration were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against nutrient loading. |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Gaps and plans |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Provide funds for regular monitoring programme implementation. |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Related measures |
|||||||||||||
Coverage of measures |
|||||||||||||
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D05-01 |
MADHR-D05-02 |
MADHR-D05-05 |
MADHR-D07-05 |
MADHR-D07-05 |
Programme name |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Nutrient levels - in water column |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
Water column - hydrological characteristics |
Water column - hydrological characteristics |
Update type |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Programme description |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. Areas under significant anthropogenic influence have unresolved urban waste water drainage system. Within reporting units are sampling stations for the parameters of the criteria within Descriptor 5. In the open sea area, the following stations are proposed: in the northern part Adriatic on the profile of the Po river delta - Rovinj (North Adriatic profile), the middle Adriatic Šibenik - Ortona (Jabuka profile), Split - Gargano (Palagruža profile), and the southern part of the Adriatic along the profile Dubrovnik - Bari (South Adriatic profile). In coastal area, locations have been proposed that are part of the regular monitoring of the state of the Adriatic according to the WFD
(2000/60 / EC) which include sites under anthropogenic pressure such as the Gulf of Rijeka and Bakar, the Port of Pula, the western coast of Istria, Bay of Šibenik, Bay of Kaštela and the mouth of the river Neretva. |
Eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. Areas under significant anthropogenic influence have unresolved urban waste water drainage system. Within reporting units are sampling stations for the parameters of the criteria within Descriptor 5. In the open sea area, the following stations are proposed: in the northern part Adriatic on the profile of the Po river delta - Rovinj (North Adriatic profile), the middle Adriatic Šibenik - Ortona (Jabuka profile), Split - Gargano (Palagruža profile), and the southern part of the Adriatic along the profile Dubrovnik - Bari (South Adriatic profile). In coastal area, locations have been proposed that are part of the regular monitoring of the state of the Adriatic according to the WFD
(2000/60 / EC) which include sites under anthropogenic pressure such as the Gulf of Rijeka and Bakar, the Port of Pula, the western coast of Istria, Bay of Šibenik, Bay of Kaštela and the mouth of the river Neretva. |
Eutrophication in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea is mainly manifested at the local level. Areas under significant anthropogenic influence have unresolved urban waste water drainage system. Within reporting units are sampling stations for the parameters of the criteria within Descriptor 5. In the open sea area, the following stations are proposed: in the northern part Adriatic on the profile of the Po river delta - Rovinj (North Adriatic profile), the middle Adriatic Šibenik - Ortona (Jabuka profile), Split - Gargano (Palagruža profile), and the southern part of the Adriatic along the profile Dubrovnik - Bari (South Adriatic profile). In coastal area, locations have been proposed that are part of the regular monitoring of the state of the Adriatic according to the WFD
(2000/60 / EC) which include sites under anthropogenic pressure such as the Gulf of Rijeka and Bakar, the Port of Pula, the western coast of Istria, Bay of Šibenik, Bay of Kaštela and the mouth of the river Neretva. |
In the Adriatic Sea, spatially and timely significant changes in the temperature, salinity and transparency are key parameters that determine dynamics of ecosystems.In the Adriatic Sea, the observed significant changes in temperature and salinity, and hence the change of water masses and thermohaline circulation have been caused by sudden change of climate in the northern hemisphere. These changes can have permanent effects on the ecosystem by changing the composition and relationships in the food chain. The consequences of these changes are different along the coast and on the open seas because the hydrographic conditions are different. |
In the Adriatic Sea, spatially and timely significant changes in the temperature, salinity and transparency are key parameters that determine dynamics of ecosystems.In the Adriatic Sea, the observed significant changes in temperature and salinity, and hence the change of water masses and thermohaline circulation have been caused by sudden change of climate in the northern hemisphere. These changes can have permanent effects on the ecosystem by changing the composition and relationships in the food chain. The consequences of these changes are different along the coast and on the open seas because the hydrographic conditions are different. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
|||||||||||||
Monitoring details |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Temperatures, salinity and transparency will be measured in coastal waters four times a year, and more often if necessary, and certainly as much as predicted by Descriptor D5, along the Split - Gargano profile (Palagruža profile) measurements would be performed once a month (10 times a year) , and in the South Adriatic and on the Jabučki profile measurements would be carried out 4 times a year (seasonally). In the northern Adriatic at the eastern stations of the profile from Rovinj to the mouth of the river Po measurements should
perform at least 6 times a year, and more often if necessary, and certainly as much as provided by Descriptor D5. The amount of suspended matter will be sampled in the surface and bottom layers of the water column and at a depth of 10 m during field trips. |
Temperatures, salinity and transparency will be measured in coastal waters four times a year, and more often if necessary, and certainly as much as predicted by Descriptor D5, along the Split - Gargano profile (Palagruža profile) measurements would be performed once a month (10 times a year) , and in the South Adriatic and on the Jabučki profile measurements would be carried out 4 times a year (seasonally). In the northern Adriatic at the eastern stations of the profile from Rovinj to the mouth of the river Po measurements should
perform at least 6 times a year, and more often if necessary, and certainly as much as provided by Descriptor D5. The amount of suspended matter will be sampled in the surface and bottom layers of the water column and at a depth of 10 m during field trips. |
|||
Features |
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Hydrographical changes
|
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Hydrographical changes
|
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Hydrographical changes
|
|
Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES criteria |
D1C6 |
D4C1 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D4C2 |
D4C4 |
D4C4 |
D5C3 |
D5C1 |
D5C2 |
D5C5 |
D5C4 |
D7C1 |
Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parameter Other |
Abundance/Biomass, species composition |
Species composition |
Species composition |
||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
Monitoring frequency |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
Other |
Other |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Determination of nutrient concentrations in seawater samples (Grasshoff, K.: Methods of Seawater Analysis, Verlag Chemie, New York, 307 pp.)
Determination of the oxygen concentration in seawater samples (Grasshoff, K.: Methods of Seawater Analysis, Verlag Chemie, New York, 307 pp.)
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr) |
Strickland, J.D.H., Parsons, T.R., 1972. A practical handbook of seawater analysis. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 167, 1–310.
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr) |
Determination of the oxygen concentration in seawater samples (Grasshoff, K.: Methods of Seawater Analysis, Verlag Chemie, New York, 307 pp.)
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. (Ftp://baltazar.izor.hr) |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar, G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar, G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Quality control |
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method. QUASIMEME |
As used in the reported monitoring method. QUASIMEME - proficiency testing scheme. |
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
Data management |
|||||||||||||
Data access |
|||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|||||||||||||
Contact |
|||||||||||||
References |