SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

Diplodus_sargus_Linnaeus_1758_(Sarago_maggiore)

Diplodus_sargus_Linnaeus_1758_(Sarago_maggiore)

Diplodus_sargus_Linnaeus_1758_(Sarago_maggiore)

Diplodus_vulgaris_Geoffroy_Saint_Hilaire_1817_(Sarago_fasciato)

Diplodus_vulgaris_Geoffroy_Saint_Hilaire_1817_(Sarago_fasciato)

Diplodus_vulgaris_Geoffroy_Saint_Hilaire_1817_(Sarago_fasciato)

Epinephelus_marginatus_Lowe_1834_(Cernia_bruna)

Epinephelus_marginatus_Lowe_1834_(Cernia_bruna)

Epinephelus_marginatus_Lowe_1834_(Cernia_bruna)

Epinephelus_marginatus_Lowe_1834_(Cernia_bruna)

Hippocampus_guttulatus_Cuvier_1829_(Cavalluccio_marino)

Hippocampus_guttulatus_Cuvier_1829_(Cavalluccio_marino)

Hippocampus_hippocampus_Linnaeus_1758_(Cavalluccio_marino)

Hippocampus_hippocampus_Linnaeus_1758_(Cavalluccio_marino)

Sciaena_umbra_Linnaeus_1758_(Corvina)

Sciaena_umbra_Linnaeus_1758_(Corvina)

Sciaena_umbra_Linnaeus_1758_(Corvina)

Umbrina_cirrosa_Linnaeus_1758_(Ombrina)

Umbrina_cirrosa_Linnaeus_1758_(Ombrina)

Umbrina_cirrosa_Linnaeus_1758_(Ombrina)

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.3.2

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

Abundance: number of individuals/125 m2; Biomass: weight (gr) of individuals/125 m2

Abundance: number of individuals/125 m2; Biomass: weight (gr) of individuals/125 m2

Absolute value indicating Fis; associated P value after 1000 permutation, to assess significance of

The baseline is set at the mean size observed within the partial reserve (C zone) of the Torre Guaceto MPA, which provided suitable reference conditions

The baseline is set at the mean abundance and biomass observed within the partial reserve (C zone) of the Torre Guaceto MPA, which provided suitable reference conditions

The baseline is set at the mean size observed within the partial reserve (C zone) of the Torre Guaceto MPA, which provided suitable reference conditions

The baseline is set at the mean abundance and biomass observed within the partial reserve (C zone) of the Torre Guaceto MPA, which provided suitable reference conditions

For Epinephelus marginatus populations, baseline was set according to Method A (reference state/negligible impacts) as a state at which the anthropogenic influences on species and habitats are considered to be negligible. Analyzing data from literature (S

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

SpeciesCondition

Acipenser_naccarii_Bonaparte_1836_(Storione_cobice)

1.3.2

Absolute values referring to: Family Heterogeneity (Hf); Band Sharing information (1-BS)

Considered the almost absence of reproductive event in the last 15 years in the natural environment, the survival of Acipenser naccarii actually relies on the restocking activities. The stock of wild origin currently reared in captivity maintains most of

Descriptive

Lack of data from wild individuals makes impossible to assess the species condition in terms of genetic structure. Up to date, residual genetic variability of the species is maintained ex-situ in some F1 stocks breed from wild individuals of different geographical origin.

Unknown_NotAssessed

SpeciesCondition

SpeciesCondition

Solea_solea_Linnaeus_1758_(Sogliola_comune)

Sparus_aurata_Linnaeus_1758_(Orata)

1.3.2

1.3.2

absolute values of mtDNA haplotype diversity (h); SNP expected heterozigosity, respectively

percentage of Atlantic genotypes in the essayed sample

At present the thresholds are set as the mean indexes' values observed in the Solea solea population samples from the North Eastern Atlantic Sea whose genetic diversity and effective population size have been assessed stable over the last 50 years based

Literature data revealed up to 50% of Atlantic genotypes in Italian commercial hatcheries. The proposed treshold is set to an intermediate level between Mediterranen baseline populations (Pat ranging from 1% to 10%) and acquaculture stocks.

NotGood

NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

SpeciesCondition

SpeciesCondition

Solea_solea_Linnaeus_1758_(Sogliola_comune)

Sparus_aurata_Linnaeus_1758_(Orata)

1.3.2

1.3.2

absolute values of mtDNA haplotype diversity (h); SNP expected heterozigosity, respectively

percentage of Atlantic genotypes in the essayed sample

At present the thresholds are set as the mean indexes' values observed in the Solea solea population samples from the North Eastern Atlantic Sea whose genetic diversity and effective population size have been assessed stable over the last 50 years based

Literature data revealed up to 50% of Atlantic genotypes in Italian commercial hatcheries. The proposed treshold is set to an intermediate level between Mediterranen baseline populations (Pat ranging from 1% to 10%) and acquaculture stocks.

NotGood

Descriptive

The percentage of observed Atlantic genotypes is below the threshold value. So, this population would result as Good. However to improve reliability, more genetic markers would be needed, such as those under development in the AQUATRACE FP7 program

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

SpeciesCondition

SpeciesCondition

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesPopulation

Carcharadon_carcharias_Linnaeus_1758_(Squalo_bianco)

Carcharadon_carcharias_Linnaeus_1758_(Squalo_bianco)

Carcharadon_carcharias_Linnaeus_1758_(Squalo_bianco)

Cethorinus_maximus_Gunnerus_1765_(Squalo_elefante)

Cethorinus_maximus_Gunnerus_1765_(Squalo_elefante)

Cethorinus_maximus_Gunnerus_1765_(Squalo_elefante)

Isurus_oxyrinchus_Rafinesque_1809_(Squalo_mako)

Isurus_oxyrinchus_Rafinesque_1809_(Squalo_mako)

Isurus_oxyrinchus_Rafinesque_1809_(Squalo_mako)

Lamna_nasus_Bonnaterre_1788_(Smeriglio)

Lamna_nasus_Bonnaterre_1788_(Smeriglio)

Lamna_nasus_Bonnaterre_1788_(Smeriglio)

Merluccius_merluccius_Linnaeus_1758_(Nasello)

Mobula_mobular_Bonnaterre_1788_(Mobula)

Mobula_mobular_Bonnaterre_1788_(Mobula)

Mobula_mobular_Bonnaterre_1788_(Mobula)

Mustelus_mustelus_Linnaeus_1758_(Palombo_liscio)

Mustelus_mustelus_Linnaeus_1758_(Palombo_liscio)

Mustelus_mustelus_Linnaeus_1758_(Palombo_liscio)

Mustelus_mustelus_Linnaeus_1758_(Palombo_liscio)

Myliobatis_aquila_Linnaeus_1758_(Aquila_di_mare)

Myliobatis_aquila_Linnaeus_1758_(Aquila_di_mare)

Myliobatis_aquila_Linnaeus_1758_(Aquila_di_mare)

Prionace_glauca_Linnaeus_1758_(Verdesca)

Prionace_glauca_Linnaeus_1758_(Verdesca)

Prionace_glauca_Linnaeus_1758_(Verdesca)

Pteromylaeus_bovinus_Geoffroy_Saint-Hilaire_1817_(Vaccarella)

Pteromylaeus_bovinus_Geoffroy_Saint-Hilaire_1817_(Vaccarella)

Pteromylaeus_bovinus_Geoffroy_Saint-Hilaire_1817_(Vaccarella)

Pteroplatytrygon_violacea_Bonaparte_1832_(Trigone_viola)

Pteroplatytrygon_violacea_Bonaparte_1832_(Trigone_viola)

Pteroplatytrygon_violacea_Bonaparte_1832_(Trigone_viola)

Rostroraja_alba_Lacépède_1803_(Razza_bianca)

Rostroraja_alba_Lacépède_1803_(Razza_bianca)

Rostroraja_alba_Lacépède_1803_(Razza_bianca)

Squatina_squatina_Linnaeus_1758_(Squadro)

Squatina_squatina_Linnaeus_1758_(Squadro)

Squatina_squatina_Linnaeus_1758_(Squadro)

Xiphias_gladius_Linnaeus_1758_(Pesce_spada)

Thunnus_thynnus_Linnaeus_1758_(Tonno_rosso)

Squalus__acanthias_Linnaeus_1758_(Spinarolo_comune)

Squalus__acanthias_Linnaeus_1758_(Spinarolo_comune)

Squalus__acanthias_Linnaeus_1758_(Spinarolo_comune)

Squalus__acanthias_Linnaeus_1758_(Spinarolo_comune)

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.2

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.3.2

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.2.1

1.3.2

1.3.2

1.3.1

1.3.2

1.1.1

1.2.1

absolute values of the SSR loci Mean Allelic Richness and M-ratio, respectively

The choice of the baseline value is linked to the estimated Ne (Ne=2,196.6, 95% CI 1,060-17,265) for the Northern hake Atlantic stock, which is based on a homogeneous sample (no evidence of admixture nor selection), with large size >100 individuals. The N

Because genetic variation data that could be referred to historical, weakly impacted baseline populations are not available for Mustelus mustelus, the indexes’ thresholds were identified at the mean indexes' values proposed by Grant and Waples (2000) as

The temporal trend obtained by reggressing the annual values ​​of latitudinal and longitudinal range against time in the period 1994-2011 is considered a baseline condition.

The temporal trend obtained by reggressing the annual average values ​​of abundance and biomass against time in the period 1994-2011 is considered a baseline condition.

The temporal trend obtained by reggressing the annual values ​​of latitudinal and longitudinal range against time in the period 1994-2011 is considered a baseline condition.

The temporal trend obtained by reggressing the annual average values ​​of abundance and biomass against time in the period 1994-2011 is considered a baseline condition.

Because genetic variation data that could be referred to baseline historical populations are not available for Xiphias gladius, the indexes’ thresholds were identified as the lowest value observed in the Northwest Atlantic populations (Alvarado Bremer et

The indexes’ baselines can be identified in the indexes’ values in historical, weakly impacted Thunnus thynnus population sample from the assessment areas of the Mediterranean available as an historical specimens' archive of Massimo Sella (Riccioni et al.

Because genetic variation data that could be referred to historical, weakly impacted baseline populations are not available for Squalus acanthias, the indexes’ thresholds were identified at the lowest observed in large study covering Pacific and Atlanti

The temporal trend obtained by reggressing the annual values ​​of latitudinal and longitudinal range against time in the period 1994-2011 is considered a baseline condition.

The temporal trend obtained by reggressing the annual average values ​​of abundance and biomass against time in the period 1994-2011 is considered a baseline condition.

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotGood

NotGood

NotAssessed

NotGood

NotGood

Good

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

Descriptive

Descriptive

Good

Good

NotAssessed

Good

Good

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotGood

NotGood

NotAssessed

Good

Descriptive

Descriptive

NotGood

Good

Available data for indicator 1.3.2 are too limited to assess reliably the species condition in terms of genetic structure, since they are based only on the mtDNA analyses of one population (N=35). However, the haplotype diverity index (h= 0.057) is significantly lower than the threshold value, So, this suggest that this population would not result as Good.

Available data for indicator 1.3.2 are too limited to assess reliably the species condition in terms of genetic structure, since they are based only on the mtDNA analyses of one population (N=35). However, the haplotype diverity index (h= 0.057) is significantly lower than the threshold value, So, this suggest that this population would not result as Good.

Data available for indicator 1.3.2 show a result (h= 0.517) close to the threshold value (h ≥ 0.56), but lower than it. This suggests that this stock/population could not be considered as Good. However further analyses are needed to improve the statistical confidence

Data available for indicator 1.3.2 show a result (h= 0.517) close to the threshold value (h ≥ 0.56), but lower than it. This suggests that this stock/population could not be considered as Good. However further analyses are needed to improve the statistical confidence

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Declining

Declining

Unknown_NotAssessed

Declining

Declining

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Stable

Stable

Unknown_NotAssessed

Stable

Stable

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Declining

Declining

Unknown_NotAssessed

Stable

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Declining

Stable

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

Caretta_caretta_Linnaeus_1758_(Tartaruga_comune)

Caretta_caretta_Linnaeus_1758_(Tartaruga_comune)

Caretta_caretta_Linnaeus_1758_(Tartaruga_comune)

Caretta_caretta_Linnaeus_1758_(Tartaruga_comune)

Caretta_caretta_Linnaeus_1758_(Tartaruga_comune)

Globicephala_melas_Traill_1809_(Globicefalo)

Globicephala_melas_Traill_1809_(Globicefalo)

Globicephala_melas_Traill_1809_(Globicefalo)

Globicephala_melas_Traill_1809_(Globicefalo)

Globicephala_melas_Traill_1809_(Globicefalo)

Physeter_macrocephalus_Linnaeus_1758_(Capodoglio)

Physeter_macrocephalus_Linnaeus_1758_(Capodoglio)

Physeter_macrocephalus_Linnaeus_1758_(Capodoglio)

Physeter_macrocephalus_Linnaeus_1758_(Capodoglio)

Physeter_macrocephalus_Linnaeus_1758_(Capodoglio)

Balaenoptera_physalus_Lacépède_1804_(Belenottera_comune)

Balaenoptera_physalus_Lacépède_1804_(Belenottera_comune)

Balaenoptera_physalus_Lacépède_1804_(Belenottera_comune)

Balaenoptera_physalus_Lacépède_1804_(Belenottera_comune)

Balaenoptera_physalus_Lacépède_1804_(Belenottera_comune)

Delphinus_delphis_Linnaeus_1758_(Delfino_comune)

Delphinus_delphis_Linnaeus_1758_(Delfino_comune)

Delphinus_delphis_Linnaeus_1758_(Delfino_comune)

Delphinus_delphis_Linnaeus_1758_(Delfino_comune)

Delphinus_delphis_Linnaeus_1758_(Delfino_comune)

Grampus_griseus_Cuvier_1812_(Grampo)

Grampus_griseus_Cuvier_1812_(Grampo)

Grampus_griseus_Cuvier_1812_(Grampo)

Grampus_griseus_Cuvier_1812_(Grampo)

Grampus_griseus_Cuvier_1812_(Grampo)

Stenella_coeruleoalba_Meyen_1833_(Stenella)

Stenella_coeruleoalba_Meyen_1833_(Stenella)

Stenella_coeruleoalba_Meyen_1833_(Stenella)

Stenella_coeruleoalba_Meyen_1833_(Stenella)

Stenella_coeruleoalba_Meyen_1833_(Stenella)

Tursiops_truncatus_Montagu_1821_(Tursiope)

Tursiops_truncatus_Montagu_1821_(Tursiope)

Tursiops_truncatus_Montagu_1821_(Tursiope)

Tursiops_truncatus_Montagu_1821_(Tursiope)

Tursiops_truncatus_Montagu_1821_(Tursiope)

Ziphius_cavirostris_Cuvier_1823_(Zifio)

Ziphius_cavirostris_Cuvier_1823_(Zifio)

Ziphius_cavirostris_Cuvier_1823_(Zifio)

Ziphius_cavirostris_Cuvier_1823_(Zifio)

Ziphius_cavirostris_Cuvier_1823_(Zifio)

1.3.2

1.1.2

GESOther

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.1.2

1.3.2

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.1.2

1.3.2

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.1.2

1.3.2

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.1.2

1.3.2

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.1.2

1.3.2

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.1.2

1.3.2

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.1.2

1.3.2

1.2.1

1.3.1

1.1.1

1.1.2

1.3.2

1.2.1

Variation in the percentage of grid cells falling in high- density value categories (aggregation ar

Percentage of number of by-caught individuals in all fishing gear with respect to the total abundanc

Percentage of human-induced moratlity relative to the total abundance, per stock (based D1.2.1.)

Variation of the present relative ratio of preferred to secondary habitat

Percentage of human-induced moratlity relative to the total abundance, per stock (based D1.2.1.)

Variation of the present relative ratio of preferred to secondary habitat

Percentage of human-induced moratlity relative to the total abundance, per stock (based D1.2.1.)

Variation of the present relative ratio of preferred to secondary habitat

Percentage of human-induced moratlity relative to the total abundance, per stock (based D1.2.1.)

Variation of the present relative ratio of preferred to secondary habitat

Percentage of human-induced moratlity relative to the total abundance, per stock (based D1.2.1.)

Variation of the present relative ratio of preferred to secondary habitat

Percentage of human-induced moratlity relative to the total abundance, per stock (based D1.2.1.)

Variation of the present relative ratio of preferred to secondary habitat

Percentage of human-induced moratlity relative to the total abundance, per stock (based D1.2.1.)

Variation of the present relative ratio of preferred to secondary habitat

Percentage of human-induced moratlity relative to the total abundance, per stock (based D1.2.1.)

Variation of the present relative ratio of preferred to secondary habitat

Present pattern of distribution (e.g. taking into consideration the relative precentages of primary and secondary habitats)

Present total abundance (based on the population estimate corrected for availability and preception bias)

Present pattern of distribution (e.g. taking into consideration the relative precentages of primary and secondary habitats)

Present total abundance (based on the population estimate corrected for availability and preception bias)

Present pattern of distribution (e.g. taking into consideration the relative precentages of primary and secondary habitats)

Present total abundance (based on the population estimate corrected for availability and preception bias)

Present pattern of distribution (e.g. taking into consideration the relative precentages of primary and secondary habitats)

Present total abundance (based on the population estimate corrected for availability and preception bias)

Present pattern of distribution (e.g. taking into consideration the relative precentages of primary and secondary habitats)

Present total abundance (based on the population estimate corrected for availability and preception bias)

Present pattern of distribution (e.g. taking into consideration the relative precentages of primary and secondary habitats)

Present total abundance (based on the population estimate corrected for availability and preception bias)

Present pattern of distribution (e.g. taking into consideration the relative precentages of primary and secondary habitats)

Present total abundance (based on the population estimate corrected for availability and preception bias)

Present pattern of distribution (e.g. taking into consideration the relative precentages of primary and secondary habitats)

Present total abundance (based on the population estimate corrected for availability and preception bias)

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

Descriptive

Descriptive

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

Descriptive

Descriptive

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

Descriptive

Descriptive

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

Descriptive

Descriptive

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

The observed species distribution indicates that the species' range spans the central-south portion of the AA. The species distribution pattern is in line with its known ecological traits.

The observed species distribution indicates that the species' range spans the central-south portion of the AA. The species distribution pattern is in line with its known ecological traits.

The observed species distribution indicates that the species' range spans the entire AA. The species distribution pattern is in line with its ecological traits, with sightings mainly in pelagic waters.

The observed species distribution indicates that the species' range spans the entire AA. The species distribution pattern is in line with its ecological traits, with sightings mainly in pelagic waters.

The observed species distribution indicates that the species' range spans the entire AA. The species distribution pattern seems in line with its ecological traits with animals frequenting mainly coastal areas of the continental platform with depths < 100m.

The observed species distribution indicates that the species' range spans the entire AA. The species distribution pattern seems in line with its ecological traits with animals frequenting mainly coastal areas of the continental platform with depths < 100m.

The observed distribution and bibliographic sources indicate that this species' range spans the southern part of the AA. The species distribution pattern seems in line with its ecological traits: mainly pelagic species (>600m), with a preference for areas with slope and submarine canyons. The southern part of the Adriatic has been identified as important for ziphius.

The observed distribution and bibliographic sources indicate that this species' range spans the southern part of the AA. The species distribution pattern seems in line with its ecological traits: mainly pelagic species (>600m), with a preference for areas with slope and submarine canyons. The southern part of the Adriatic has been identified as important for ziphius.

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

Calonectris_diomedea_Scopoli_1769_(Scopoli_s_Shearwater)

Calonectris_diomedea_Scopoli_1769_(Scopoli_s_Shearwater)

Calonectris_diomedea_Scopoli_1769_(Scopoli_s_Shearwater)

Calonectris_diomedea_Scopoli_1769_(Scopoli_s_Shearwater)

Puffinus_yelkouan_Acerbi_1827_(Yelkouan_Shearwater)

Puffinus_yelkouan_Acerbi_1827_(Yelkouan_Shearwater)

Puffinus_yelkouan_Acerbi_1827_(Yelkouan_Shearwater)

Puffinus_yelkouan_Acerbi_1827_(Yelkouan_Shearwater)

1.3

1.1

GESOther

1.2

1.3

1.1

GESOther

1.2

NotGood

OtherStatus

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

OtherStatus

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Stable

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

SpeciesCondition

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

Melanitta_fusca_Linnaeus_1758_(Velvet_Scoter)

Melanitta_fusca_Linnaeus_1758_(Velvet_Scoter)

Melanitta_fusca_Linnaeus_1758_(Velvet_Scoter)

Phalacrocorax_aristotelis_desmarestii_Payraudeau_1826_(Mediterranean_Shag)

Phalacrocorax_aristotelis_desmarestii_Payraudeau_1826_(Mediterranean_Shag)

Phalacrocorax_aristotelis_desmarestii_Payraudeau_1826_(Mediterranean_Shag)

Sterna_sandvicensis_Latham_1787_(Sandwich_Tern)

Sterna_sandvicensis_Latham_1787_(Sandwich_Tern)

Sterna_sandvicensis_Latham_1787_(Sandwich_Tern)

Sterna_sandvicensis_Latham_1787_(Sandwich_Tern)

1.1

GESOther

1.2

1.1

GESOther

1.2

1.3

1.1

GESOther

1.2

OtherStatus

NotAssessed

OtherStatus

Good

NotAssessed

Good

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

NotAssessed

number of wintering birds fluctuating and widespread offshore

Stable

Unknown_NotAssessed

Stable

Improving

Unknown_NotAssessed

Improving

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Species distribution

SpeciesOverall

SpeciesPopulation

Sterna_sandvicensis_Latham_1787_(Sandwich_Tern)

Sterna_sandvicensis_Latham_1787_(Sandwich_Tern)

Sterna_sandvicensis_Latham_1787_(Sandwich_Tern)

1.2

GESOther

1.3

mean number of sites per year with more than 1 wintering ind during 1998-2011 (IWC data)

mean number of inds per year during 1998-2011 (IWC data)

OtherStatus

OtherStatus

OtherStatus

Gap in distribution probably due to natural causes, but data missing

Low number probably due to natural causes, but data missing

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

Unknown_NotAssessed

OtherFeature

Aquaculture-Environment interaction-pathogens

GESOther

Descriptive

In this subregion, during last decades few mortality outbreaks due to transmissible pathogens were described in wild fish population: one outbreak of Photobacteriosis due to Photobacterium damselae susp. piscicida was observed in 1990 alongside the coasts of Northern Adriatic Sea in eight different species; an outbreak of vibriosis by Vibrio spp. (Listonella (Vibrio) anguillarum, V. harveyi and V. chagassi) was described in Atherina boyeri during summer 2008 alongside the Gulf of Trieste. As far as outbreaks caused by virus, Betanodavirus were detected in ten different species alongside Rimini and Ravenna in 2006 without mortality. The Betanodavirus, the causative agent of the Viral Encephalopathy and Retinopathy (VER), is frequently associated to disease outbreaks in farmed European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in the Mediterranean and more recently also in Gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). In wild fish populations, betanodavirus has been isolated from different fish species in this subregion, including groupers (Epinephelus spp.), red mullet (Mullus barbatus and M. surmuletus), gilthead seabream, poor cod (Trisopterus minutus capelanus), shi drum (Umbrina cirrosa). The dusky grouper (E. marginatus), an endangered species, is particularly sensitive to betanodavirus infection and few cases have been reported in the southern part of this sub-region. A case of mortality has been further described in 2011 in shi drum in north Adriatic sea. In fish reared in sea cages, several outbreaks of VER where reported in European seabass and a single case in sharpsnout seabream (Diplodus puntazzo) and gilthead seabream. The trend of betanodavirosis seems to be stable, however, global warming and introductions of new fish species in the Mediterranean, could affect its diffusion and impact in the next future. Photobacterium damselae susp. Piscicida was further isolated during few outbreaks by sharpsnout seabream and European seabass; some cases of vibriosis by Listonella (Vibrio) anguillarum were reported in European seabass. Outbreaks of systemic mycobacteriosis due to Mycobacterium marinum have been not reported in fish farmed in sea cages. However some cases are reported elsewhere in the Mediterranean, suggesting the monitoring of this pathogen, which further represents a zoonotic agent. Concerning parasitosis, Microcotylid Monogenean infections by Sparicotyle crysophrii were observed in gilthead seabream showing a stable trend; Enteromyxosis due to Enteromyxum leei was observed in gilthead seabream and sharpsnout seabream, with high mortality outbreaks in the second species. No significant mortality is reported in shellfish production areas due to transmissible pathogens, with a stable trend in the last few years. Bonamia ostrae and B. exitiosa are both found in farmed and wild flat oyster (Ostrea edulis) in the Adriatic subregion, with prevalence below 1% and not associated with mortality. Marteilia refringens is found in farmed and wild flat oyster (Ostrea edulis) and in Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) in the Adriatic subregion, with prevalence below 1% and usually not associated with mortality. However wild oysters with M. refrigens could be more subjected to mortality when used for aquaculture. Perkinsus olseni is a common finding of Manila clam T. philippinarum and usually not associated to mortality. It is endemic in the northern Adriatic lagoons with prevalence up to 50-60%. However, cases of mortality have been reported in those area characterized by high prevalence (up to 90%) and overfishing, which represents a major issue in the next future. P. olseni is further reported in other species such as T. decussata, Callista chione, Chamelea gallina with prevalence below 1%. Ostreid herpes virus 01 microvar is an emerging pathogen found in farmed and wild flat oyster. Actually no mortality has been reported, but it would seem to be more pathogenic in lagoons during critical seasons.

Stable