Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D8 / Italy / Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D8 Contaminants |
Member State | Italy |
Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea |
Reported by | ISPRA - Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research |
Report date | 2020-10-01 |
Report access | MSFD_2018_ART8_GES_IT_2020-07-31.xml |
Ionian Sea and Central Mediterranean Sea (IT-ISCMS-0001)
GES component |
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Acute pollution events
|
Marine species
|
Marine species
|
Marine species
|
Element |
1,1,1-Trichloroethane |
1,2-Dichlorobenzene |
1,2-Dichloroethane |
1,3-Dichlorobenzene |
1,4-Dichlorobenzene |
2,4,5-T |
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol |
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol |
2,4-Dichlorophenol |
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2-4 D |
2-Chlorophenol |
2-Chlorotoluene |
3,4-Dichloroaniline |
3-Chlorophenol |
4-Chloroaniline |
4-Chlorophenol |
Alachlor |
Aldrin |
Aldrin |
Alpha-HCH |
Alpha-HCH |
Anthracene |
Anthracene |
Arsenic and its compounds |
Arsenic and its compounds |
Atrazine |
Azinphos-ethyl |
Azinphos-methyl |
Bentazone |
Benzene |
Benzo[e]pyrene |
Benzo[e]pyrene |
Benzo[e]pyrene |
Benzo[e]pyrene |
Beta-HCH |
Beta-HCH |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Carbon tetrachloride |
Chlorfenvinphos |
Chloroalkanes C10-13 |
Chlorobenzene |
Chlorpyrifos |
Chromium VI |
Chromium and its compounds |
Chromium and its compounds |
DDT, p,p' |
Demeton |
Dichloromethane |
Dichlorvos |
Dieldrin |
Dieldrin |
Dimethoate |
Diuron |
Endosulfan |
Endrin |
Fenitrothion |
Fenthion |
Fluoranthene |
Fluoranthene |
Fluoranthene |
Fluoranthene |
Gamma-HCH (Lindane) |
Gamma-HCH (Lindane) |
Hexachlorobenzene |
Hexachlorobenzene |
Hexachlorobenzene |
Hexachlorobutadiene |
Hexachlorobutadiene |
Isodrin |
Isoproturon |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Linuron |
MCPA |
Malathion |
Mecoprop |
Methamidophos |
Mevinphos |
Naphthalene |
Naphthalene |
Nickel and its compounds |
Nickel and its compounds |
Nonylphenol |
Omethoate |
Oxydemeton-methyl |
Parathion |
Parathion-methyl |
Pentachlorobenzene |
Pentachlorophenol |
Simazine |
Terbuthylazine |
Tetrachloroethylene |
Toluene |
Total DDT (DDT, p,p' + DDT, o,p' + DDE, p,p' + DDD, p,p') |
Total DDT (DDT, p,p' + DDT, o,p' + DDE, p,p' + DDD, p,p') |
Total DDT (DDT, p,p' + DDT, o,p' + DDE, p,p' + DDD, p,p') |
Trichlorobenzenes (all isomers) |
Trichloroethylene |
Trichloromethane |
Trifluralin |
Triphenyltin and compounds |
Xylene |
o,p′-DDD |
o,p′-DDE |
p,p′-DDD |
p,p′-DDE |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene |
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene |
Benzo(k)fluoranthene |
Indeno(1,2,3,-cd)pyrene |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Total PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene) |
Tributyltin compounds |
Tributyltin-cation |
Calonectris diomedea diomedea |
Larus audouinii |
Puffinus yelkouan |
|
Element code |
CAS_71-55-6 |
CAS_95-50-1 |
CAS_107-06-2 |
CAS_541-73-1 |
CAS_106-46-7 |
CAS_93-76-5 |
CAS_95-95-4 |
CAS_88-06-2 |
CAS_120-83-2 |
CAS_94-75-7 |
CAS_95-57-8 |
CAS_95-49-8 |
CAS_95-76-1 |
MCP3 |
4CLANL |
MCP4 |
CAS_15972-60-8 |
CAS_309-00-2 |
CAS_309-00-2 |
CAS_319-84-6 |
CAS_319-84-6 |
CAS_120-12-7 |
CAS_120-12-7 |
CAS_7440-38-2 |
CAS_7440-38-2 |
CAS_1912-24-9 |
CAS_2642-71-9 |
CAS_86-50-0 |
CAS_25057-89-0 |
CAS_71-43-2 |
BEP |
BEP |
BEP |
BEP |
CAS_319-85-7 |
CAS_319-85-7 |
CAS_7440-43-9 |
CAS_7440-43-9 |
CAS_56-23-5 |
CAS_470-90-6 |
CAS_85535-84-8 |
CAS_108-90-7 |
CAS_2921-88-2 |
CAS_18540-29-9 |
CAS_7440-47-3 |
CAS_7440-47-3 |
CAS_50-29-3 |
DEMT |
CAS_75-09-2 |
CAS_62-73-7 |
CAS_60-57-1 |
CAS_60-57-1 |
CAS_60-51-5 |
CAS_330-54-1 |
CAS_115-29-7 |
CAS_72-20-8 |
CAS_122-14-5 |
CAS_55-38-9 |
CAS_206-44-0 |
CAS_206-44-0 |
CAS_206-44-0 |
CAS_206-44-0 |
CAS_58-89-9 |
CAS_58-89-9 |
CAS_118-74-1 |
CAS_118-74-1 |
CAS_118-74-1 |
CAS_87-68-3 |
CAS_87-68-3 |
CAS_465-73-6 |
CAS_34123-59-6 |
CAS_7439-92-1 |
CAS_7439-92-1 |
CAS_330-55-2 |
CAS_94-74-6 |
CAS_121-75-5 |
CAS_7085-19-0 |
CAS_10265-92-6 |
CAS_7786-34-7 |
CAS_91-20-3 |
CAS_91-20-3 |
CAS_7440-02-0 |
CAS_7440-02-0 |
NOPHE |
CAS_1113-02-6 |
ODEMTM |
CAS_56-38-2 |
CAS_298-00-0 |
CAS_608-93-5 |
CAS_87-86-5 |
CAS_122-34-9 |
CAS_5915-41-3 |
CAS_127-18-4 |
CAS_108-88-3 |
EEA_32-03-1 |
EEA_32-03-1 |
EEA_32-03-1 |
CAS_12002-48-1 |
CAS_79-01-6 |
CAS_67-66-3 |
CAS_1582-09-8 |
EEA_33-61-4 |
CAS_1330-20-7 |
CAS_53-19-0 |
CAS_3424-82-6 |
CAS_72-54-8 |
CAS_72-55-9 |
CAS_205-99-2 |
CAS_191-24-2 |
CAS_207-08-9 |
CAS_193-39-5 |
CAS_7439-97-6 |
CAS_7439-97-6 |
CAS_7439-97-6 |
CAS_7439-97-6 |
EEA_33-56-7 |
TBTIN |
CAS_36643-28-4 |
226017 |
137139 |
137204 |
|
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
ICES
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
ICES
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
ICES
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
ICES
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|
Element 2 |
DEMERSAL FISHES
|
LITTORAL ROCK
|
DEMERSAL FISHES
|
LITTORAL ROCK
|
DEMERSAL FISHES
|
LITTORAL ROCK
|
DEMERSAL FISHES
|
LITTORAL ROCK
|
DEMERSAL FISHES
|
DEMERSAL FISHES
|
LITTORAL ROCK
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
EU |
MS in (sub)region |
MS in (sub)region |
MS in (sub)region |
|
Criterion |
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C3
|
D8C4
|
D8C4
|
D8C4
|
Parameter |
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
amount of hydrocarbons accidentally discharged in the acute pollution event |
abundance of individuals affected
|
abundance of individuals affected
|
abundance of individuals affected
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
50.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Number of individuals affected by acute pollution events high enough to endanger condition of the species in terms of distribution and population |
Number of individuals affected by acute pollution events high enough to endanger condition of the species in terms of distribution and population |
Number of individuals affected by acute pollution events high enough to endanger condition of the species in terms of distribution and population |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
International Maritime Organisation (MARPOL, Ballast Water Convention, Antifouling Convention)
|
|||
Threshold value source other |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010 |
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
|
||||
Value achieved upper |
17.057 |
-0.12 |
-0.12 |
-0.12 |
17.057 |
-0.12 |
-0.12 |
-0.12 |
60.99 |
60.99 |
4258.55 |
-0.635 |
65.75 |
5.17 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
-0.063 |
4258.55 |
-0.635 |
-1.177 |
14.16 |
60.99 |
65.75 |
5.17 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
65.75 |
65.75 |
5.17 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
60.99 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
4258.55 |
-0.635 |
-1.01 |
2.933 |
60.99 |
75.8 |
-1.08 |
-0.12 |
-1.18 |
-0.851 |
17.057 |
65.75 |
5.17 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
4258.55 |
-0.635 |
65.75 |
5.17 |
-0.12 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
17.057 |
-0.12 |
-0.063 |
60.99 |
-0.78 |
17.057 |
-0.6 |
-0.063 |
60.99 |
60.99 |
60.99 |
60.99 |
4258.55 |
4258.55 |
4258.55 |
4258.55 |
65.75 |
5.17 |
24.87 |
3.0 |
4258.55 |
75.8 |
1.11 |
25.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
-1.095 |
-1.093 |
-1.093 |
-1.093 |
-1.095 |
-1.093 |
-1.093 |
-1.093 |
-0.91 |
-0.91 |
-1.19 |
-1.137 |
-0.92 |
-1.11 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.1 |
-1.19 |
-1.137 |
-1.194 |
-1.199 |
-0.91 |
-0.92 |
-1.11 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-0.92 |
-0.92 |
-1.11 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-0.91 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.19 |
-1.137 |
-1.099 |
-1.099 |
-0.91 |
-0.7 |
-1.08 |
-1.192 |
-1.18 |
-1.178 |
-1.095 |
-0.92 |
-1.11 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.19 |
-1.137 |
-0.92 |
-1.11 |
-1.093 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.095 |
-1.093 |
-1.1 |
-0.91 |
-0.78 |
-1.095 |
-1.14 |
-1.1 |
-0.91 |
-0.91 |
-0.91 |
-0.91 |
-1.19 |
-1.19 |
-1.19 |
-1.19 |
-0.92 |
-1.11 |
2.57 |
-1.06 |
-1.19 |
-0.7 |
1.11 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensional number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensiona l number
|
adimensional number
|
number of individuals
|
number of individuals
|
number of individuals
|
|
Proportion threshold value |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
|||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
extent in km2 of MRU adversely affected |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
extent in km2 of MRU adversely affected |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
||||||||||||||
Trend |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Not relevant |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Not relevant |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Not relevant |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Not relevant |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Not relevant |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Fluoranthene and Naphtalene. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: XILENEs (BTEX+stirene), Xylene, Benzene, Toluene, 3-Clorotoluene |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Fluoranthene and Naphtalene. |
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,193%
|
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,15%
|
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Fluoranthene and Naphtalene. |
The % of covered assessment zone was 1,544%
|
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,244%
|
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.993 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. |
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,193%
|
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,187%
|
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,193%
|
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,15%
|
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Fluoranthene and Naphtalene. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: XILENEs (BTEX+stirene), Xylene, Benzene, Toluene, 3-Clorotoluene |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,193%
|
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,9 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: TBT (Cation) and Triphenyltin (compounds) |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: XILENEs (BTEX+stirene), Xylene, Benzene, Toluene, 3-Clorotoluene |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium. |
The % of covered assessment zone was 1,931%
|
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,262%
|
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.993 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. |
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,9 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore.
Value of the index composed by: TBT (Cation) and Triphenyltin (compounds) |
||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to BTEX in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Metals in ISCMS. So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Fluoranthene in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Fluoranthene in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCB in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCB in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCB in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCBDE in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCBDE in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to BTEX in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to organo halogenated in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to ORGANITIN COMPOUNDS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to BTEX in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Organohalogenated Compounds in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Organohalogenated Compounds in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Organohalogenated Compounds in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Organohalogenated Compounds in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMs . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMs . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMs . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMs . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMs . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCB in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to ORGANOHALOGENATED COMPOUNDS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
No acute pollution event occurred in the assessment period 2012-2017 according to the threshold agreed at National and International level |
No acute pollution event occurred in the assessment period 2012-2017 according to the threshold agreed at National and International level |
No acute pollution event occurred in the assessment period 2012-2017 according to the threshold agreed at National and International level |
No acute pollution event occurred in the assessment period 2012-2017 according to the threshold agreed at National and International level |
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
|
Description element |
No acute pollution event occurred in the assessment period 2012-2017 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014.
From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed." |
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same. |
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same. |
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same. |
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same. |
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same. |
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same. |
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same. |
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same. |
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same. |
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same. |
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same. |
||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|