Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D8 / Italy / Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D8 Contaminants
Member State Italy
Region/subregion Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea
Reported by ISPRA - Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research
Report date 2020-10-01
Report access MSFD_2018_ART8_GES_IT_2020-07-31.xml

Ionian Sea and Central Mediterranean Sea (IT-ISCMS-0001)

GES component
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
D8
Feature
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
Contaminants - UPBT substances
Contaminants - UPBT substances
Contaminants - UPBT substances
Contaminants - UPBT substances
Contaminants - UPBT substances
Contaminants - UPBT substances
Contaminants - UPBT substances
Contaminants - UPBT substances
Contaminants - UPBT substances
Contaminants - UPBT substances
Contaminants - UPBT substances
Acute pollution events
Marine species
Marine species
Marine species
Element
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2-4 D
2-Chlorophenol
2-Chlorotoluene
3,4-Dichloroaniline
3-Chlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chlorophenol
Alachlor
Aldrin
Aldrin
Alpha-HCH
Alpha-HCH
Anthracene
Anthracene
Arsenic and its compounds
Arsenic and its compounds
Atrazine
Azinphos-ethyl
Azinphos-methyl
Bentazone
Benzene
Benzo[e]pyrene
Benzo[e]pyrene
Benzo[e]pyrene
Benzo[e]pyrene
Beta-HCH
Beta-HCH
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorfenvinphos
Chloroalkanes C10-13
Chlorobenzene
Chlorpyrifos
Chromium VI
Chromium and its compounds
Chromium and its compounds
DDT, p,p'
Demeton
Dichloromethane
Dichlorvos
Dieldrin
Dieldrin
Dimethoate
Diuron
Endosulfan
Endrin
Fenitrothion
Fenthion
Fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
Gamma-HCH (Lindane)
Gamma-HCH (Lindane)
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Isodrin
Isoproturon
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Linuron
MCPA
Malathion
Mecoprop
Methamidophos
Mevinphos
Naphthalene
Naphthalene
Nickel and its compounds
Nickel and its compounds
Nonylphenol
Omethoate
Oxydemeton-methyl
Parathion
Parathion-methyl
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Simazine
Terbuthylazine
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Total DDT (DDT, p,p' + DDT, o,p' + DDE, p,p' + DDD, p,p')
Total DDT (DDT, p,p' + DDT, o,p' + DDE, p,p' + DDD, p,p')
Total DDT (DDT, p,p' + DDT, o,p' + DDE, p,p' + DDD, p,p')
Trichlorobenzenes (all isomers)
Trichloroethylene
Trichloromethane
Trifluralin
Triphenyltin and compounds
Xylene
o,p′-DDD
o,p′-DDE
p,p′-DDD
p,p′-DDE
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Indeno(1,2,3,-cd)pyrene
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Total PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene)
Tributyltin compounds
Tributyltin-cation
Calonectris diomedea diomedea
Larus audouinii
Puffinus yelkouan
Element code
CAS_71-55-6
CAS_95-50-1
CAS_107-06-2
CAS_541-73-1
CAS_106-46-7
CAS_93-76-5
CAS_95-95-4
CAS_88-06-2
CAS_120-83-2
CAS_94-75-7
CAS_95-57-8
CAS_95-49-8
CAS_95-76-1
MCP3
4CLANL
MCP4
CAS_15972-60-8
CAS_309-00-2
CAS_309-00-2
CAS_319-84-6
CAS_319-84-6
CAS_120-12-7
CAS_120-12-7
CAS_7440-38-2
CAS_7440-38-2
CAS_1912-24-9
CAS_2642-71-9
CAS_86-50-0
CAS_25057-89-0
CAS_71-43-2
BEP
BEP
BEP
BEP
CAS_319-85-7
CAS_319-85-7
CAS_7440-43-9
CAS_7440-43-9
CAS_56-23-5
CAS_470-90-6
CAS_85535-84-8
CAS_108-90-7
CAS_2921-88-2
CAS_18540-29-9
CAS_7440-47-3
CAS_7440-47-3
CAS_50-29-3
DEMT
CAS_75-09-2
CAS_62-73-7
CAS_60-57-1
CAS_60-57-1
CAS_60-51-5
CAS_330-54-1
CAS_115-29-7
CAS_72-20-8
CAS_122-14-5
CAS_55-38-9
CAS_206-44-0
CAS_206-44-0
CAS_206-44-0
CAS_206-44-0
CAS_58-89-9
CAS_58-89-9
CAS_118-74-1
CAS_118-74-1
CAS_118-74-1
CAS_87-68-3
CAS_87-68-3
CAS_465-73-6
CAS_34123-59-6
CAS_7439-92-1
CAS_7439-92-1
CAS_330-55-2
CAS_94-74-6
CAS_121-75-5
CAS_7085-19-0
CAS_10265-92-6
CAS_7786-34-7
CAS_91-20-3
CAS_91-20-3
CAS_7440-02-0
CAS_7440-02-0
NOPHE
CAS_1113-02-6
ODEMTM
CAS_56-38-2
CAS_298-00-0
CAS_608-93-5
CAS_87-86-5
CAS_122-34-9
CAS_5915-41-3
CAS_127-18-4
CAS_108-88-3
EEA_32-03-1
EEA_32-03-1
EEA_32-03-1
CAS_12002-48-1
CAS_79-01-6
CAS_67-66-3
CAS_1582-09-8
EEA_33-61-4
CAS_1330-20-7
CAS_53-19-0
CAS_3424-82-6
CAS_72-54-8
CAS_72-55-9
CAS_205-99-2
CAS_191-24-2
CAS_207-08-9
CAS_193-39-5
CAS_7439-97-6
CAS_7439-97-6
CAS_7439-97-6
CAS_7439-97-6
EEA_33-56-7
TBTIN
CAS_36643-28-4
226017
137139
137204
Element code source
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
ICES
ICES
ICES
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
ICES
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
ICES
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
ICES
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
ICES
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
DEMERSAL FISHES
LITTORAL ROCK
DEMERSAL FISHES
LITTORAL ROCK
DEMERSAL FISHES
LITTORAL ROCK
DEMERSAL FISHES
LITTORAL ROCK
DEMERSAL FISHES
DEMERSAL FISHES
LITTORAL ROCK
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
EU
National
National
National
National
EU
EU
National
National
EU
National
National
National
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
National
National
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
National
EU
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
EU
EU
National
National
National
National
National
EU
EU
National
National
National
EU
EU
EU
EU
National
EU
EU
EU
National
National
National
National
National
National
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
National
National
National
National
National
EU
EU
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
EU
EU
EU
EU
National
National
EU
MS in (sub)region
MS in (sub)region
MS in (sub)region
Criterion
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C1
D8C3
D8C4
D8C4
D8C4
Parameter
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in biota
Concentration in biota
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in biota
Concentration in biota
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in biota
Concentration in biota
Concentration in biota
Concentration in biota
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in biota
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in water
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Concentration in biota
Concentration in biota
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
Other
Other
Other
Other
Parameter other
amount of hydrocarbons accidentally discharged in the acute pollution event
abundance of individuals affected
abundance of individuals affected
abundance of individuals affected
Threshold value upper
50.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Number of individuals affected by acute pollution events high enough to endanger condition of the species in terms of distribution and population
Number of individuals affected by acute pollution events high enough to endanger condition of the species in terms of distribution and population
Number of individuals affected by acute pollution events high enough to endanger condition of the species in terms of distribution and population
Threshold value source
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
International Maritime Organisation (MARPOL, Ballast Water Convention, Antifouling Convention)
Threshold value source other
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
Legislative decree 172/2015 and Ministerial decree 260/2010
EU (WFD -EQS 2008/105/EC & 2013/39/EU)
Value achieved upper
17.057
-0.12
-0.12
-0.12
17.057
-0.12
-0.12
-0.12
60.99
60.99
4258.55
-0.635
65.75
5.17
17.057
17.057
17.057
-0.063
4258.55
-0.635
-1.177
14.16
60.99
65.75
5.17
17.057
17.057
65.75
65.75
5.17
17.057
17.057
60.99
17.057
17.057
17.057
17.057
17.057
4258.55
-0.635
-1.01
2.933
60.99
75.8
-1.08
-0.12
-1.18
-0.851
17.057
65.75
5.17
17.057
17.057
17.057
17.057
17.057
17.057
4258.55
-0.635
65.75
5.17
-0.12
17.057
17.057
17.057
17.057
-0.12
-0.063
60.99
-0.78
17.057
-0.6
-0.063
60.99
60.99
60.99
60.99
4258.55
4258.55
4258.55
4258.55
65.75
5.17
24.87
3.0
4258.55
75.8
1.11
25.0
Value achieved lower
-1.095
-1.093
-1.093
-1.093
-1.095
-1.093
-1.093
-1.093
-0.91
-0.91
-1.19
-1.137
-0.92
-1.11
-1.095
-1.095
-1.095
-1.1
-1.19
-1.137
-1.194
-1.199
-0.91
-0.92
-1.11
-1.095
-1.095
-0.92
-0.92
-1.11
-1.095
-1.095
-0.91
-1.095
-1.095
-1.095
-1.095
-1.095
-1.19
-1.137
-1.099
-1.099
-0.91
-0.7
-1.08
-1.192
-1.18
-1.178
-1.095
-0.92
-1.11
-1.095
-1.095
-1.095
-1.095
-1.095
-1.095
-1.19
-1.137
-0.92
-1.11
-1.093
-1.095
-1.095
-1.095
-1.095
-1.093
-1.1
-0.91
-0.78
-1.095
-1.14
-1.1
-0.91
-0.91
-0.91
-0.91
-1.19
-1.19
-1.19
-1.19
-0.92
-1.11
2.57
-1.06
-1.19
-0.7
1.11
Value unit
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
tonne
Other
Other
Other
Value unit other
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensiona l number
adimensiona l number
adimensiona l number
adimensiona l number
adimensiona l number
adimensiona l number
adimensiona l number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensional number
adimensiona l number
adimensiona l number
adimensional number
number of individuals
number of individuals
number of individuals
Proportion threshold value
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
extent in km2 of MRU adversely affected
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
extent in km2 of MRU adversely affected
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
Trend
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Stable
Stable
Stable
Improving
Stable
Improving
Improving
Stable
Improving
Stable
Improving
Stable
Improving
Stable
Improving
Stable
Stable
Not relevant
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Improving
Stable
Improving
Not relevant
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Not relevant
Not relevant
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Stable
Stable
Stable
Improving
Stable
Improving
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Improving
Improving
Not relevant
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Stable
Stable
Not relevant
Stable
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Stable
Stable
Improving
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Not relevant
Stable
Stable
Improving
Stable
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Parameter achieved
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Description parameter
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Fluoranthene and Naphtalene.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: XILENEs (BTEX+stirene), Xylene, Benzene, Toluene, 3-Clorotoluene
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Fluoranthene and Naphtalene.
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,193%
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,15%
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Fluoranthene and Naphtalene.
The % of covered assessment zone was 1,544%
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,244%
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.993 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,193%
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,187%
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,193%
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,15%
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Fluoranthene and Naphtalene.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2-Chlorophenol, 3-Chlorophenol, 4-Chlorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Pentachlorophenol, 4-Nonylphenol and Octylphenol
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: XILENEs (BTEX+stirene), Xylene, Benzene, Toluene, 3-Clorotoluene
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,193%
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 1,1,1,Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,3 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, 1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-3-nitrobenzene, 1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene, 2-Chloroaniline, 2-Chlorotoluene, 3,4-Dichloroaniline, 3-Chloroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, 4-Chlorotoluene, Alachlor, C10-13 Chloroalkanes, Aldrin, Atrazine, Chlorobenzene, Chloro nitro toluene, Dichloromethane, Dieldrin, Endrin, Eptachloro, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH, Isodrin, Pentachlorobenzene, p-p' DDT, Simazine, Terbutilazine, Tetrachloroethylene, Carbon tetrachloride, Trichlorobenzenes, Trichloroethylene, Trichloromethane and s DDT total.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 2,1 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: 2,4 D, 2,4,5 T, Azinphos-methyl, Azinphos-ethyl, Bentazon, Chlorfenvinphos, Chlorpyriphos, Demeton, Dichlorvos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Endosulfan, Fenitrotion, Fention, Isoproturon, Linuron, Malathion, MCPA, Mecoprop, Methamidophos, Mevinphos, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Paration ethyl, Paration methyl, Trifluralin and Pesticide single
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,9 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: TBT (Cation) and Triphenyltin (compounds)
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: XILENEs (BTEX+stirene), Xylene, Benzene, Toluene, 3-Clorotoluene
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.75% within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Aldrin,Dieldrin,α-HCH,β-HCH,γ-HCH,s DDT total,s DDD total and s DDE total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.162 % within 3Km and9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic,Chromium total,Mercury (and its compounds),Nickel (and its compounds),Lead (and its compounds),Chromium_VI and Cadmium
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,5 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Arsenic, Chromium total, Mercury (and its compounds), Nickel (and its compounds), Lead (and its compounds) and Cadmium.
The % of covered assessment zone was 1,931%
The % of covered assessment zone was 0,262%
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1.068 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: Anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Benzo(g,h,i)perylene,Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,Fluoranthene,Naphtalene and PAH total
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 0.993 % within 3Km and 9.211% for offshore.
The assessment was done distinguishing within coastal line (1nm WFD) and offshore area (behind coastal waters) . The % of covered assessment zone was 1,9 % within 3Km and 15% for offshore. Value of the index composed by: TBT (Cation) and Triphenyltin (compounds)
Related indicator
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam_Sediment
  • Chemical Index D8C1_Contam
Criteria status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Good
Good
Good
Description criteria
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to BTEX in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Metals in ISCMS. So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Fluoranthene in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Fluoranthene in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCB in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCB in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCB in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCBDE in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCBDE in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAH in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PHENOLS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to BTEX in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to organo halogenated in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PESTICIDES AND BIOCIDES in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to ORGANITIN COMPOUNDS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to BTEX in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Organohalogenated Compounds in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Organohalogenated Compounds in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Organohalogenated Compounds in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Organohalogenated Compounds in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMs . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMs . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMs . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMs . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to metals in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to PAHs in ISCMs . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to HCB in ISCMS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to ORGANOHALOGENATED COMPOUNDS in IS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data.
No acute pollution event occurred in the assessment period 2012-2017 according to the threshold agreed at National and International level
No acute pollution event occurred in the assessment period 2012-2017 according to the threshold agreed at National and International level
No acute pollution event occurred in the assessment period 2012-2017 according to the threshold agreed at National and International level
No acute pollution event occurred in the assessment period 2012-2017 according to the threshold agreed at National and International level
Element status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Good
Good
Description element
No acute pollution event occurred in the assessment period 2012-2017
Integration rule type parameter
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
NHIE_WEI
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Proportion of substances in good status
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
Description overall status
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
"In general, the percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. From a comparison with the data of the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), an average decrease of the percentages of exceedances recorded for the various categories is observed."
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same.
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same.
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same.
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same.
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same.
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same.
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same.
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same.
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same.
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same.
The percentage of data coverage, although different for the various matrices and subregions, is not large enough to allow a judgment on the environmental status as established in the definitions of the EGN of DECREE 17 October 2014. The data available for this evaluation, qualitatively confirm the quality status described in the initial assessment (IA 2006-2012), which showed only the exceeding of mercury threshold in the functional groups of bivalve molluscs and demersal fish. Comparing the percentages of mercury overruns between the IA and the current evaluation, it is observed that for the sub-regions AS and ISCMS the percentages coincide for both functional groups, while for the sub-region AS there is a decrease of the same.
Assessments period
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
Related pressures
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Acute pollution events
  • Acute pollution events
  • Acute pollution events
  • Acute pollution events
Related targets
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.1
  • T 8.2
  • T 8.3
  • T 8.3
  • T 8.3
  • T 8.3