Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Lithuania / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
Member State | Lithuania |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Environmental Protection Agency |
Report date | 2020-06-09 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART8_GES_04-07-corrected_06-04.xml |
BAL-LT-AA-03
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Element code |
126417 |
126417 |
126417 |
126417 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
127141 |
127141 |
126425 |
126425 |
126425 |
126425 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 25-29 and 32, excluding the Gulf of Riga (central Baltic Sea) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 25-29 and 32, excluding the Gulf of Riga (central Baltic Sea) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 25-29 and 32, excluding the Gulf of Riga (central Baltic Sea) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 25-29 and 32, excluding the Gulf of Riga (central Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in subdivisions 26 and 28 (east of Gotland and Gulf of Gdansk) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in subdivisions 26 and 28 (east of Gotland and Gulf of Gdansk) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Element 2 code |
her.27.25-2932
|
her.27.25-2932
|
her.27.25-2932
|
her.27.25-2932
|
cod.27.24-32
|
cod.27.24-32
|
cod.27.24-32
|
cod.27.24-32
|
fle.27.2628
|
fle.27.2628
|
spr.27.22-32
|
spr.27.22-32
|
spr.27.22-32
|
spr.27.22-32
|
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Parameter other |
SIZE distribution
|
SIZE distribution
|
SIZE distribution
|
SIZE distribution
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.22 |
600000.0 |
0.26 |
570000.0 |
||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Statistically reliable positive trend or no trend
|
Statistically reliable positive trend or no trend
|
F
|
SSB> MSYBtrigger
|
Statistically reliable positive trend or no trend
|
Statistically reliable positive trend or no trend
|
Statistically reliable positive trend or no trend
|
Statistically reliable positive trend or no trend
|
Statistically reliable positive trend or no trend
|
Statistically reliable positive trend or no trend
|
||||
Threshold value source |
||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.195 |
1341625.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
97284.0 |
0.13 |
0.66 |
0.1 |
0.42 |
0.22 |
1289000.0 |
0.74 |
0.27 |
|
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||
Value unit |
tonne
|
tonne
|
tonne
|
|||||||||||
Value unit other |
||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
|
Trend |
Improving |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
For the values of the indicator “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on the records of research vessels: herring (Clupea harengus)” the trend is statistically significantly negative (p = 0.1), the condition is not good.
|
For the values of the indicator “Proportion of fish larger than the average rate of first sexual maturity: herring (Clupea harengus) (> 16 cm)” the trend is statistically significantly negative (p = 0.1), the condition is not good.
|
In recent years, for the cod stock in the Eastern Baltic (Subdivisions 25-32), the sustainable fishing mortality rate (MSY) has not been calculated. Cod stocks are significantly overexploited and in a critical state due to the negative effects of commercial fishing. Both the spawning stock biomass and fishing mortality did not comply with the GES during the period under review, and in the second half of 2019 commercial fishing for eastern Baltic cod was generally banned (FMSY = 0).
|
In recent years, for the cod stock in the Eastern Baltic (Subdivisions 25-32), the sustainable fishing mortality rate (MSY) has not been calculated. Cod stocks are significantly overexploited and in a critical state due to the negative effects of commercial fishing. Both the spawning stock biomass and fishing mortality did not comply with the GES during the period under review, and in the second half of 2019 commercial fishing for eastern Baltic cod was generally banned (FMSY = 0).
|
There was no statistically significant trend (p = 0.13) for the values of the indicator “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on the records of research vessels: cod (Gadus morhua)”, the condition is good.
|
There was no statistically significant trend (p = 0.66) for the values of the indicator “Proportion of fish larger than the average rate of first sexual maturity: cod (Gadus morhua) (> 35 cm)”, the condition is good.
|
For the indicators: "Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: plaice (Platichthys flesus) (> 21.5 cm)" and "95th percentile of the length distribution based on research vessel records: plaice (Platichthys flesus)", the GES corresponds statistically. reliable positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, there was no statistically significant trend for the values of flounder indicators, the condition by species of flounder (Platichthys flesus) was good.
|
For the indicators: "Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: plaice (Platichthys flesus) (> 21.5 cm)" and "95th percentile of the length distribution based on research vessel records: plaice (Platichthys flesus)", the GES corresponds statistically. reliable positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, there was no statistically significant trend for the values of flounder indicators, the condition by species of flounder (Platichthys flesus) was good.
|
For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: sprat (Sprattus sprattus) (> 12 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: sprat (Sprattus sprattus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, a statistically reliable trend was not found for the values of sprat indicators, the condition is good. Overall condition by species of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) - good.
|
For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: sprat (Sprattus sprattus) (> 12 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: sprat (Sprattus sprattus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, a statistically reliable trend was not found for the values of sprat indicators, the condition is good. Overall condition by species of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) - good.
|
||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: herring (Clupea harengus) (> 16 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: herring (Clupea harengus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. The trends of the values of both indicators were statistically significantly negative (p = 0.01), the condition is not good according to the indicators of the D3C3 criterion.
|
For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: herring (Clupea harengus) (> 16 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: herring (Clupea harengus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. The trends of the values of both indicators were statistically significantly negative (p = 0.01), the condition is not good according to the indicators of the D3C3 criterion.
|
For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: cod (Gadus morhua) (> 35 cm)” and “95th percentile of the length distribution based on research vessel records: cod (Gadus morhua)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, there is no statistically significant trend for the values of cod indicators, the condition is good. However, the overall condition by species of cod (Gadus morhua) is poor.
|
For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: cod (Gadus morhua) (> 35 cm)” and “95th percentile of the length distribution based on research vessel records: cod (Gadus morhua)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, there is no statistically significant trend for the values of cod indicators, the condition is good. However, the overall condition by species of cod (Gadus morhua) is poor.
|
For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: sprat (Sprattus sprattus) (> 12 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: sprat (Sprattus sprattus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, a statistically reliable trend was not found for the values of sprat indicators, the condition is good. Overall condition by species of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) - good.
|
For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: sprat (Sprattus sprattus) (> 12 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: sprat (Sprattus sprattus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, a statistically reliable trend was not found for the values of sprat indicators, the condition is good. Overall condition by species of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) - good.
|
For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: sprat (Sprattus sprattus) (> 12 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: sprat (Sprattus sprattus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, a statistically reliable trend was not found for the values of sprat indicators, the condition is good. Overall condition by species of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) - good.
|
For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: sprat (Sprattus sprattus) (> 12 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: sprat (Sprattus sprattus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, a statistically reliable trend was not found for the values of sprat indicators, the condition is good. Overall condition by species of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) - good.
|
||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
For herring (Clupea harengus) stocks, the SSB-compliant GES corresponds to the MSYBtrigger and the fishing mortality F corresponds to the FMSY. Given that herring stocks are exploited at a lower rate than FMSY, it can be assumed that herring stocks and their SSBs will increase or remain stable in the long run. For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: herring (Clupea harengus) (> 16 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: herring (Clupea harengus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. The trends of the values of both indicators were statistically significantly negative (p = 0.01), the condition is not good according to the indicators of the D3C3 criterion.
|
For herring (Clupea harengus) stocks, the SSB-compliant GES corresponds to the MSYBtrigger and the fishing mortality F corresponds to the FMSY. Given that herring stocks are exploited at a lower rate than FMSY, it can be assumed that herring stocks and their SSBs will increase or remain stable in the long run. For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: herring (Clupea harengus) (> 16 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: herring (Clupea harengus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. The trends of the values of both indicators were statistically significantly negative (p = 0.01), the condition is not good according to the indicators of the D3C3 criterion.
|
For herring (Clupea harengus) stocks, the SSB-compliant GES corresponds to the MSYBtrigger and the fishing mortality F corresponds to the FMSY. Given that herring stocks are exploited at a lower rate than FMSY, it can be assumed that herring stocks and their SSBs will increase or remain stable in the long run. For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: herring (Clupea harengus) (> 16 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: herring (Clupea harengus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. The trends of the values of both indicators were statistically significantly negative (p = 0.01), the condition is not good according to the indicators of the D3C3 criterion.
|
For herring (Clupea harengus) stocks, the SSB-compliant GES corresponds to the MSYBtrigger and the fishing mortality F corresponds to the FMSY. Given that herring stocks are exploited at a lower rate than FMSY, it can be assumed that herring stocks and their SSBs will increase or remain stable in the long run. For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: herring (Clupea harengus) (> 16 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: herring (Clupea harengus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. The trends of the values of both indicators were statistically significantly negative (p = 0.01), the condition is not good according to the indicators of the D3C3 criterion.
|
In recent years, for the cod stock in the Eastern Baltic (Subdivisions 25-32), the sustainable fishing mortality rate (MSY) has not been calculated. Cod stocks are significantly overexploited and in a critical state due to the negative effects of commercial fishing. Both the spawning stock biomass and fishing mortality did not comply with the GES during the period under review, and in the second half of 2019 commercial fishing for eastern Baltic cod was generally banned (FMSY = 0). For the other indicators: "Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: cod (Gadus morhua) (> 35 cm)" and "95th percentile of the length distribution based on research vessel records: cod (Gadus morhua)", the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, there is no statistically significant trend for the values of cod indicators, the condition is good. However, the overall condition by species of cod (Gadus morhua) is poor.
|
In recent years, for the cod stock in the Eastern Baltic (Subdivisions 25-32), the sustainable fishing mortality rate (MSY) has not been calculated. Cod stocks are significantly overexploited and in a critical state due to the negative effects of commercial fishing. Both the spawning stock biomass and fishing mortality did not comply with the GES during the period under review, and in the second half of 2019 commercial fishing for eastern Baltic cod was generally banned (FMSY = 0). For the other indicators: "Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: cod (Gadus morhua) (> 35 cm)" and "95th percentile of the length distribution based on research vessel records: cod (Gadus morhua)", the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, there is no statistically significant trend for the values of cod indicators, the condition is good. However, the overall condition by species of cod (Gadus morhua) is poor.
|
In recent years, for the cod stock in the Eastern Baltic (Subdivisions 25-32), the sustainable fishing mortality rate (MSY) has not been calculated. Cod stocks are significantly overexploited and in a critical state due to the negative effects of commercial fishing. Both the spawning stock biomass and fishing mortality did not comply with the GES during the period under review, and in the second half of 2019 commercial fishing for eastern Baltic cod was generally banned (FMSY = 0). For the other indicators: "Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: cod (Gadus morhua) (> 35 cm)" and "95th percentile of the length distribution based on research vessel records: cod (Gadus morhua)", the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, there is no statistically significant trend for the values of cod indicators, the condition is good. However, the overall condition by species of cod (Gadus morhua) is poor.
|
In recent years, for the cod stock in the Eastern Baltic (Subdivisions 25-32), the sustainable fishing mortality rate (MSY) has not been calculated. Cod stocks are significantly overexploited and in a critical state due to the negative effects of commercial fishing. Both the spawning stock biomass and fishing mortality did not comply with the GES during the period under review, and in the second half of 2019 commercial fishing for eastern Baltic cod was generally banned (FMSY = 0). For the other indicators: "Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: cod (Gadus morhua) (> 35 cm)" and "95th percentile of the length distribution based on research vessel records: cod (Gadus morhua)", the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, there is no statistically significant trend for the values of cod indicators, the condition is good. However, the overall condition by species of cod (Gadus morhua) is poor.
|
For the indicators: "Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: plaice (Platichthys flesus) (> 21.5 cm)" and "95th percentile of the length distribution based on research vessel records: plaice (Platichthys flesus)", the GES corresponds statistically. reliable positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, there was no statistically significant trend for the values of flounder indicators, the condition by species of flounder (Platichthys flesus) was good.
|
For the indicators: "Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: plaice (Platichthys flesus) (> 21.5 cm)" and "95th percentile of the length distribution based on research vessel records: plaice (Platichthys flesus)", the GES corresponds statistically. reliable positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, there was no statistically significant trend for the values of flounder indicators, the condition by species of flounder (Platichthys flesus) was good.
|
The SSB corresponding to sprat (Sprattus sprattus) stocks corresponds to MSYBtrigger and the fishing mortality rate F corresponds to FMSY. The status of the indicator is in line with the GES and has improved compared to the results of the JSPD cycle I (2006-2011). The sprat stock has long been exploited at a higher rate than the FMSY regime, but fishing mortality has declined at the end of the assessment period. Given that F is currently in line with the GES, it can be assumed that sprat stocks and their SSBs will increase or remain stable in the long run. On the other hand, declining cod abundance can have a positive effect on sprat stocks. For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: sprat (Sprattus sprattus) (> 12 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: sprat (Sprattus sprattus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, a statistically reliable trend was not found for the values of sprat indicators, the condition is good. Overall condition by species of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) - good.
|
The SSB corresponding to sprat (Sprattus sprattus) stocks corresponds to MSYBtrigger and the fishing mortality rate F corresponds to FMSY. The status of the indicator is in line with the GES and has improved compared to the results of the JSPD cycle I (2006-2011). The sprat stock has long been exploited at a higher rate than the FMSY regime, but fishing mortality has declined at the end of the assessment period. Given that F is currently in line with the GES, it can be assumed that sprat stocks and their SSBs will increase or remain stable in the long run. On the other hand, declining cod abundance can have a positive effect on sprat stocks. For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: sprat (Sprattus sprattus) (> 12 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: sprat (Sprattus sprattus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, a statistically reliable trend was not found for the values of sprat indicators, the condition is good. Overall condition by species of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) - good.
|
The SSB corresponding to sprat (Sprattus sprattus) stocks corresponds to MSYBtrigger and the fishing mortality rate F corresponds to FMSY. The status of the indicator is in line with the GES and has improved compared to the results of the JSPD cycle I (2006-2011). The sprat stock has long been exploited at a higher rate than the FMSY regime, but fishing mortality has declined at the end of the assessment period. Given that F is currently in line with the GES, it can be assumed that sprat stocks and their SSBs will increase or remain stable in the long run. On the other hand, declining cod abundance can have a positive effect on sprat stocks. For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: sprat (Sprattus sprattus) (> 12 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: sprat (Sprattus sprattus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, a statistically reliable trend was not found for the values of sprat indicators, the condition is good. Overall condition by species of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) - good.
|
The SSB corresponding to sprat (Sprattus sprattus) stocks corresponds to MSYBtrigger and the fishing mortality rate F corresponds to FMSY. The status of the indicator is in line with the GES and has improved compared to the results of the JSPD cycle I (2006-2011). The sprat stock has long been exploited at a higher rate than the FMSY regime, but fishing mortality has declined at the end of the assessment period. Given that F is currently in line with the GES, it can be assumed that sprat stocks and their SSBs will increase or remain stable in the long run. On the other hand, declining cod abundance can have a positive effect on sprat stocks. For the indicators: “Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate: sprat (Sprattus sprattus) (> 12 cm)” and “95th percentile of fish length distribution based on research vessel records: sprat (Sprattus sprattus)”, the GES corresponds to a statistically significant positive trend or no trend. According to both indicators, a statistically reliable trend was not found for the values of sprat indicators, the condition is good. Overall condition by species of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) - good.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
The environmental status of the marine area (BAL-LT-AA-03) according to D3 was assessed according to three criteria (D3C1, D3C2, D3C3) described by the indicators for four commercial fisheries (cod, herring, sprat and plaice): 1) Fishing mortality rate ( D3C1), 2) Spawning stock biomass (D3C2), 3) 95th percentile of fish length distribution based on records from research vessels (D3C3), 4) Proportion of fish above the average first sexual maturity rate (D3C3). Indicator values were calculated for each species (element). After integrating the indicators, the condition of the sea area was assessed for each element (species). Based on the 2009-2017 According to the values of the indicators calculated from the data of the period, the environmental condition of the marine area was not good according to the indicators of cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea harengus), according to the indicators of sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
|
Assessments period |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
2009-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|