Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D6 / Lithuania / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
| Member State | Lithuania |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | Reporter not found |
| Report date | Date not found; 2020-10-16 |
| Report access |
2014 data
2020 data
| Monitoring programme | Monitoring programme name | MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
MP_D5 |
MP_D5 |
MP_D5 |
MP_D5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring programme | Reference existing programme | |||||||
| Monitoring programme | Marine Unit ID | |||||||
| Q4e - Programme ID | BALLT-D01234-2 |
BALLT-D01234-2 |
BALLT-D012567-8 |
BALLT-D02457-1 |
BALLT-D02457-1 |
BALLT-D02457-1 |
BALLT-D02457-1 |
|
| Q4f - Programme description |
The aim is to make a reliable assessment of the state and composition of Lithuanian coastal fish communities, taking into account the diversity of communities, age structure of the main fish species, population parameters of abundance and biomass, as well as changes in populations and communities. Indicators calculated using monitoring data are sufficiently sensitive and changes in population status are observed over the course of several years. The indicatorâs dependence on commercial fishing is sufficiently demonstrated in various marine regions and freshwaters. Fishing intensity as one of the main factors affecting coastal fish communities is monitored and regulated by legislation. The monitoring of fish communities reflects the effectiveness of these fisheries regulatory measures.
In order to provide a reliable assessment of the status and composition of the Lithuanian coastal fish communities, monitoring is foreseen on an annual basis in different areas of the Baltic Sea.
|
The aim is to make a reliable assessment of the state and composition of Lithuanian coastal fish communities, taking into account the diversity of communities, age structure of the main fish species, population parameters of abundance and biomass, as well as changes in populations and communities. Indicators calculated using monitoring data are sufficiently sensitive and changes in population status are observed over the course of several years. The indicatorâs dependence on commercial fishing is sufficiently demonstrated in various marine regions and freshwaters. Fishing intensity as one of the main factors affecting coastal fish communities is monitored and regulated by legislation. The monitoring of fish communities reflects the effectiveness of these fisheries regulatory measures.
In order to provide a reliable assessment of the status and composition of the Lithuanian coastal fish communities, monitoring is foreseen on an annual basis in different areas of the Baltic Sea.
|
The monitoring of benthic habitats is intended to assess the status of important marine habitats and their changes under the Habitats Directive, the WFD and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. On the Lithuanian coast there are valuable hard and soft bottom habitats that function as spawning grounds, grazing areas for fish and birds, juvenile shelters or maintaining a high species diversity. Habitat monitoring shall consist of parts of the qualitative and quantitative assessment of habitats, typical species. Soft soil monitoring based on point studies (qualitative evaluation) is currently being carried out. The monitoring results shall be used to assess the status of the sea on the basis of the BQI index. This index measures benthic quality in terms of abundance of invertebrate benthic fauna, number of species and sensitivity of taxonomic groups. Macrophytobenthos is also monitored in the coastal boundaries of protected areas (raphs) to assess the species composition, abundance/coating, biomass, depth of growth of macrophyte communities.
The results of the monitoring shall be used to assess effects (e.g. watering of port-based ground, sand feeding of beaches, bottom trawling) or to monitor the consequences of eutrophication.
|
According to eutrophication descriptor‘s aproach and targets it can be stated that environmental monitoring program fulfills all requirements and indicators.
The overall approach of Lithuanian monitoring program is described in the Marine Strategy of Lithuania. The programe mainly addresses criteria and indicators which relates with eutrophication processes, like concentrations of nutrients, chlorophyll „a“, oxygen concentrations, macrophytes and macroalgae, water transparency. Considering DSPIR framework monitoring program coherent only with pressure on the sea environment. The programme is focussed on pressures, but also includes state/impacts. |
According to eutrophication descriptor‘s aproach and targets it can be stated that environmental monitoring program fulfills all requirements and indicators.
The overall approach of Lithuanian monitoring program is described in the Marine Strategy of Lithuania. The programe mainly addresses criteria and indicators which relates with eutrophication processes, like concentrations of nutrients, chlorophyll „a“, oxygen concentrations, macrophytes and macroalgae, water transparency. Considering DSPIR framework monitoring program coherent only with pressure on the sea environment. The programme is focussed on pressures, but also includes state/impacts. |
According to eutrophication descriptor‘s aproach and targets it can be stated that environmental monitoring program fulfills all requirements and indicators.
The overall approach of Lithuanian monitoring program is described in the Marine Strategy of Lithuania. The programe mainly addresses criteria and indicators which relates with eutrophication processes, like concentrations of nutrients, chlorophyll „a“, oxygen concentrations, macrophytes and macroalgae, water transparency. Considering DSPIR framework monitoring program coherent only with pressure on the sea environment. The programme is focussed on pressures, but also includes state/impacts. |
According to eutrophication descriptor‘s aproach and targets it can be stated that environmental monitoring program fulfills all requirements and indicators.
The overall approach of Lithuanian monitoring program is described in the Marine Strategy of Lithuania. The programe mainly addresses criteria and indicators which relates with eutrophication processes, like concentrations of nutrients, chlorophyll „a“, oxygen concentrations, macrophytes and macroalgae, water transparency. Considering DSPIR framework monitoring program coherent only with pressure on the sea environment. The programme is focussed on pressures, but also includes state/impacts. |
|
| Q5e - Natural variability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate data | Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Established methods | Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES | Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate capacity | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment |
The status of the Baltic Sea Coastal Fish Community is assessed on the basis of HELCOM recommendations using 4 key indicators reflecting the state of the fish communities: the Community Diversity Index (Shannon Index) (Indicator 1.6.1.), the Community Size Index (high fish abundance) (indicator 1.7.1), the Community abundance index (predators) and the Community trophic index (indicators 4.2.1.). Methodological recommendations for the calculation of these indicators and data collection have been developed by HELCOM experts. For calculation purposes, the data shall be collected as part of the monitoring programme.
The use of standardised studies over a number of years makes it possible to assess natural variations and to determine (expertly) the extent of anthropogenic exposure (variation of indicators and status depending on the intensity of known factors).
|
The status of the Baltic Sea Coastal Fish Community is assessed on the basis of HELCOM recommendations using 4 key indicators reflecting the state of the fish communities: the Community Diversity Index (Shannon Index) (Indicator 1.6.1.), the Community Size Index (high fish abundance) (indicator 1.7.1), the Community abundance index (predators) and the Community trophic index (indicators 4.2.1.). Methodological recommendations for the calculation of these indicators and data collection have been developed by HELCOM experts. For calculation purposes, the data shall be collected as part of the monitoring programme.
The use of standardised studies over a number of years makes it possible to assess natural variations and to determine (expertly) the extent of anthropogenic exposure (variation of indicators and status depending on the intensity of known factors).
|
The results of the monitoring (covering the monitoring of the species composition, abundance and biomass of macrozoobenthos, point studies) will be sufficient for their use to assess the state of the marine environment on the basis of the HPI (minimum quality index) index. The index is suitable for soft soil habitats. The collection of long-term zoobenthos data will allow the monitoring of long-term developments and progress towards GES. This will contribute to the status assessment under Descriptor D6. The objectives and associated indicators under Descriptors D1,4,6 will be reviewed and updated by the end of 2015, which will allow for an assessment of the data needs and appropriate monitoring planning. The results of macrophytobenthos monitoring can still be used to assess the status of shallow solid soil habitats. However, so far, monitoring provides point-specific data on the status of individual elements of the ecosystem and information on the distribution, distributional characteristics, etc. of habitats is not available. However, in order to assess D1 status 4 it is necessary to plan for the monitoring of solid soil habitats.
Insufficient data to assess whether changes in habitat status due to natural factors and climate change impacts or anthropogenic effects are insufficient. This requires an in-depth analysis of existing data in order to assess changes and their nature, and there is no evidence so far.
Climate change baseline indicators (temperatures, salinity) are monitored and their assessment is based on analysis of long-term data. There are no standard methods to distinguish climate effects from anthropogenic effects, and therefore most often rely on a case-by-case assessment of the status according to a specific indicator. It is almost impossible to distinguish between anthropogenic and natural change: E.g. in the flue-water dispersion zone, where the effects of increased food and organic substances (anthropogenic) and salinity (climate) are combined. In such cases, the sensitivity of the indicators to the impact in those areas is limited and abandoned.
|
)
e. Do not responds to risks of not achieving GES.
For more information in the pdf report.
|
)
e. Do not responds to risks of not achieving GES.
For more information in the pdf report.
|
)
e. Do not responds to risks of not achieving GES.
For more information in the pdf report.
|
)
e. Do not responds to risks of not achieving GES.
For more information in the pdf report.
|
|
| Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment | By2018 |
By2018 |
After2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
|
| Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment |
Monitoring is scheduled to take place annually instead of 1 times every 3 years. The planned research sites will sufficiently cover the diversity of natural conditions in the area under assessment and the potential impact of human activities. Lithuanian experts participate in the regional (Baltic) working group (HELCOM FISH-PRO II) where indicators on the status of fish communities are developed, data analysis is carried out at regional level and gaps are identified. Where appropriate, consideration shall be given to shortcomings and possible solutions.
For more information in the pdf report, pages 16-20.
|
Monitoring is scheduled to take place annually instead of 1 times every 3 years. The planned research sites will sufficiently cover the diversity of natural conditions in the area under assessment and the potential impact of human activities. Lithuanian experts participate in the regional (Baltic) working group (HELCOM FISH-PRO II) where indicators on the status of fish communities are developed, data analysis is carried out at regional level and gaps are identified. Where appropriate, consideration shall be given to shortcomings and possible solutions.
For more information in the pdf report, pages 16-20.
|
The monitoring programme is not yet adequate. Monitoring of solid benthic habitats, including an assessment of the distribution, size and status of habitats, must be planned. Lithuanian experts participate in the regional working group preparing recommendations/methodology for habitat monitoring. So far, the methodologies are being tested by scientific institutions. Once the methodology has been agreed at regional level, it is planned to include it in the national monitoring programme. For the time being, the methodology for assessing the status of habitats is also at the development stage. Lithuanian experts participate in the regional working group (HELCOM CORESET II, HELCOM Balsam) which develops the evaluation methodology according to the âExtent, pattern and distribution of benthic biotopesâ indicator (1.4
|
In order to fill gaps in the distribution of nutrient flows, it is proposed to establish comprehensive seasonal observation programmes in the KlaipÄda Strait in order to assess nutrient flows, taking into account the specific results of current direction and velocity, meteorological conditions and precipitation, and using modern modelling tools.
The frequency of studies on macroalgae, including the maximum depth of red algae distribution, has been increased instead of once every 3 years, with annual surveys.
An assessment of the impact on coastal waters and nutrient balances of secondary pollution (nutrients accumulated in existing sediments) is envisaged.
|
In order to fill gaps in the distribution of nutrient flows, it is proposed to establish comprehensive seasonal observation programmes in the KlaipÄda Strait in order to assess nutrient flows, taking into account the specific results of current direction and velocity, meteorological conditions and precipitation, and using modern modelling tools.
The frequency of studies on macroalgae, including the maximum depth of red algae distribution, has been increased instead of once every 3 years, with annual surveys.
An assessment of the impact on coastal waters and nutrient balances of secondary pollution (nutrients accumulated in existing sediments) is envisaged.
|
In order to fill gaps in the distribution of nutrient flows, it is proposed to establish comprehensive seasonal observation programmes in the KlaipÄda Strait in order to assess nutrient flows, taking into account the specific results of current direction and velocity, meteorological conditions and precipitation, and using modern modelling tools.
The frequency of studies on macroalgae, including the maximum depth of red algae distribution, has been increased instead of once every 3 years, with annual surveys.
An assessment of the impact on coastal waters and nutrient balances of secondary pollution (nutrients accumulated in existing sediments) is envisaged.
|
In order to fill gaps in the distribution of nutrient flows, it is proposed to establish comprehensive seasonal observation programmes in the KlaipÄda Strait in order to assess nutrient flows, taking into account the specific results of current direction and velocity, meteorological conditions and precipitation, and using modern modelling tools.
The frequency of studies on macroalgae, including the maximum depth of red algae distribution, has been increased instead of once every 3 years, with annual surveys.
An assessment of the impact on coastal waters and nutrient balances of secondary pollution (nutrients accumulated in existing sediments) is envisaged.
|
|
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Environmental target | 4 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Associated indicator | 1.6.1 1.7.1 4.2.1 a 4.2.1 b 4.3.1 a 4.3.1 b 4.3.1 c 4.3.1 d 4.3.1 e 4.3.1 f |
1.6.1 1.7.1 4.2.1 a 4.2.1 b 4.3.1 a 4.3.1 b 4.3.1 c 4.3.1 d 4.3.1 e 4.3.1 f |
6.2.2 a 6.2.2 b |
5.1.1 a 5.1.1 b 5.1.1 d 5.1.1 e 5.1.1 f 5.1.1 g 5.1.1 h 5.2.1 a 5.2.1 b 5.2.2 5.3.1 |
5.1.1 a 5.1.1 b 5.1.1 d 5.1.1 e 5.1.1 f 5.1.1 g 5.1.1 h 5.2.1 a 5.2.1 b 5.2.2 5.3.1 |
5.1.1 a 5.1.1 b 5.1.1 d 5.1.1 e 5.1.1 f 5.1.1 g 5.1.1 h 5.2.1 a 5.2.1 b 5.2.2 5.3.1 |
5.1.1 a 5.1.1 b 5.1.1 d 5.1.1 e 5.1.1 f 5.1.1 g 5.1.1 h 5.2.1 a 5.2.1 b 5.2.2 5.3.1 |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_SuitableData | Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_EstablishedMethods | Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6d_AdequateCapacity | Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q6c - Target updating | Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
| Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment |
The status shall be assessed annually using monitoring data on the basis of indicators of good environmental status.
A revision of the objectives and related indicators is foreseen for 2015. The adequacy and adequacy of monitoring will then be assessed in order to assess progress towards objectives.
|
The status shall be assessed annually using monitoring data on the basis of indicators of good environmental status.
A revision of the objectives and related indicators is foreseen for 2015. The adequacy and adequacy of monitoring will then be assessed in order to assess progress towards objectives.
|
The monitoring programme will allow further assessment of the status of habitats on the basis of the benthic quality index (BQI). The targets will also be reviewed and revised in the first half of 2015, which will then assess the adequacy of the monitoring and its adequacy in assessing progress towards targets. The programme will be improved as necessary.
|
The main measures to achieve GES status for eutrophication indicators in the Baltic Sea are also broadly in line with the requirements of other Directives as foreseen in the EC Water Framework Directive and already implemented. However, as indicated (Lithuanian measures to improve the status of water bodies, 2011), only two of them will have a more significant impact on pollution loads and efforts to improve their status, namely the implementation of the requirements of the Urban Waste Water Treatment (UWW) and Nitrates (ND) Directives.
More information see page 245 in http://vanduo.gamta.lt/cms/index?rubricId
|
The main measures to achieve GES status for eutrophication indicators in the Baltic Sea are also broadly in line with the requirements of other Directives as foreseen in the EC Water Framework Directive and already implemented. However, as indicated (Lithuanian measures to improve the status of water bodies, 2011), only two of them will have a more significant impact on pollution loads and efforts to improve their status, namely the implementation of the requirements of the Urban Waste Water Treatment (UWW) and Nitrates (ND) Directives.
More information see page 245 in http://vanduo.gamta.lt/cms/index?rubricId
|
The main measures to achieve GES status for eutrophication indicators in the Baltic Sea are also broadly in line with the requirements of other Directives as foreseen in the EC Water Framework Directive and already implemented. However, as indicated (Lithuanian measures to improve the status of water bodies, 2011), only two of them will have a more significant impact on pollution loads and efforts to improve their status, namely the implementation of the requirements of the Urban Waste Water Treatment (UWW) and Nitrates (ND) Directives.
More information see page 245 in http://vanduo.gamta.lt/cms/index?rubricId
|
The main measures to achieve GES status for eutrophication indicators in the Baltic Sea are also broadly in line with the requirements of other Directives as foreseen in the EC Water Framework Directive and already implemented. However, as indicated (Lithuanian measures to improve the status of water bodies, 2011), only two of them will have a more significant impact on pollution loads and efforts to improve their status, namely the implementation of the requirements of the Urban Waste Water Treatment (UWW) and Nitrates (ND) Directives.
More information see page 245 in http://vanduo.gamta.lt/cms/index?rubricId
|
|
| Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment | By2018 |
By2018 |
After2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
|
| Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment |
See 5h answer.
|
See 5h answer.
|
See 5h answer
|
Lithuaniaâs obligations to collect and properly treat waste water from certain agglomerations are fulfilled in accordance with the deadlines and conditions laid down in the Treaty of Accession to the EU. The main measures of the UWWTD provide for the improvement of waste water collection infrastructure, the installation of water treatment plants and their rehabilitation in settlements. Accordingly, according to pollution loads, in order to ensure that the quality of the waste water discharged is consistent with the requirements for discharges to surface water bodies. In order to fill gaps in the distribution of nutrient flows, it is proposed to establish a comprehensive programme of nutrient flows in the KlaipÄda Strait.
|
Lithuaniaâs obligations to collect and properly treat waste water from certain agglomerations are fulfilled in accordance with the deadlines and conditions laid down in the Treaty of Accession to the EU. The main measures of the UWWTD provide for the improvement of waste water collection infrastructure, the installation of water treatment plants and their rehabilitation in settlements. Accordingly, according to pollution loads, in order to ensure that the quality of the waste water discharged is consistent with the requirements for discharges to surface water bodies. In order to fill gaps in the distribution of nutrient flows, it is proposed to establish a comprehensive programme of nutrient flows in the KlaipÄda Strait.
|
Lithuaniaâs obligations to collect and properly treat waste water from certain agglomerations are fulfilled in accordance with the deadlines and conditions laid down in the Treaty of Accession to the EU. The main measures of the UWWTD provide for the improvement of waste water collection infrastructure, the installation of water treatment plants and their rehabilitation in settlements. Accordingly, according to pollution loads, in order to ensure that the quality of the waste water discharged is consistent with the requirements for discharges to surface water bodies. In order to fill gaps in the distribution of nutrient flows, it is proposed to establish a comprehensive programme of nutrient flows in the KlaipÄda Strait.
|
Lithuaniaâs obligations to collect and properly treat waste water from certain agglomerations are fulfilled in accordance with the deadlines and conditions laid down in the Treaty of Accession to the EU. The main measures of the UWWTD provide for the improvement of waste water collection infrastructure, the installation of water treatment plants and their rehabilitation in settlements. Accordingly, according to pollution loads, in order to ensure that the quality of the waste water discharged is consistent with the requirements for discharges to surface water bodies. In order to fill gaps in the distribution of nutrient flows, it is proposed to establish a comprehensive programme of nutrient flows in the KlaipÄda Strait.
|
|
| Q7a - Relevant activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities |
The location of the sites will sufficiently cover the diversity of natural conditions in the area under assessment and the potential impact of human activities.
|
The location of the sites will sufficiently cover the diversity of natural conditions in the area under assessment and the potential impact of human activities.
|
National monitoring is an assessment of the status on the basis of macrozoobenthos. Monitoring sites are allocated according to the areas of economic activity and their potential impact. Monitoring shall also be carried out in areas where port excavation is carried out at sea. In addition, specific monitoring shall be carried out in the following areas to assess the impact of port economic activities on the state of the marine environment: The state of the damping area itself and its exposure zone shall be assessed. The effects of replenishing beach sands are also assessed.
|
Monitoring program is not able to identify which pressures that are causing environmental changes, only indicates levels of nutrients in water body. |
Monitoring program is not able to identify which pressures that are causing environmental changes, only indicates levels of nutrients in water body. |
Monitoring program is not able to identify which pressures that are causing environmental changes, only indicates levels of nutrients in water body. |
Monitoring program is not able to identify which pressures that are causing environmental changes, only indicates levels of nutrients in water body. |
|
| Q7c - Relevant measures | ||||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate data | Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Established methods | Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES | Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate capacity | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures | Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures |
A programme of measures is under preparation. Priority should be given to the effects and risks for which measures are needed. In the light of the proposed measures, it is envisaged to specify the objectives and related indicators and to assess the impact of the measures (individually for each measure and integrated impact). The adequacy of the monitoring programme will be assessed accordingly. At the same time, common measures are planned at regional level for the whole region. The proposed measures will be considered and, where appropriate, planned to be implemented.
|
A programme of measures is under preparation. Priority should be given to the effects and risks for which measures are needed. In the light of the proposed measures, it is envisaged to specify the objectives and related indicators and to assess the impact of the measures (individually for each measure and integrated impact). The adequacy of the monitoring programme will be assessed accordingly. At the same time, common measures are planned at regional level for the whole region. The proposed measures will be considered and, where appropriate, planned to be implemented.
|
||||||
| Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures | By2018 |
By2018 |
After2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
|
| Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme ID | BALLT-D01234_FishCoastal |
BALLT-D01234_FishCoastal |
BALLT-D01256_Macrozoobenthos |
BALLT-D025_Phyto |
BALLT-D05_ChlA |
BALLT-D05_Nutrients |
BALLT-D05_WaterChem |
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme name | Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Nutrient levels - in water column |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme ID | BALLT-D01234_FishCoastal |
BALLT-D01234_FishCoastal |
BALLT-D01256_Macrozoobenthos |
BALLT-D025_Phyto |
BALLT-D05_ChlA |
BALLT-D05_Nutrients |
BALLT-D05_WaterChem |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme name | Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Nutrient levels - in water column |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
| Q4k - Monitoring purpose | StateImpact Pressurse Activities Measures |
StateImpact Pressurse Activities Measures |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
|
| Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions | Water Framework directive, Habitats directive; Monitoring incorporated into present programme and described in Monitoring programme description, paper report. |
Water Framework directive, Habitats directive; Monitoring incorporated into present programme and described in Monitoring programme description, paper report. |
Water Framework Policy directive, Helsinki convention (HELCOM COMBINE). Monitoring incorporated into present programme. |
Water Framework Directive; Monitoring incorporated into present programme. |
Water Framework Directive. Monitoring incorporated into present programme and described in Monitoring programme paper report |
Water Framework Directive. Monitoring incorporated into present programme and described in Monitoring programme |
Water Framework Directive. Monitoring incorporated into present programme and described in Monitoring programme paper report. |
|
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Habitats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Species list |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Physical/Chemical features |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q9a - Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5a - GES criteria | Relevant GES criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5b - GES indicators | Relevant GES indicators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species distribution | |||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population size |
|
|
|
||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population characteristics |
|
|
|||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species impacts | |||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat distribution | |||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat extent | |||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (physical-chemical) |
|
||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (biological) |
|
|
|||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat impacts | |||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure input | |||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure output |
|
||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) | Activity | |||||||
| Q9b Parameters monitored (other) | Other | |||||||
| Q41 Spatial scope | WFD_TW WFD_CW |
WFD_TW WFD_CW |
WFD_TW WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ |
WFD_TW WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ |
WFD_TW WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ |
WFD_TW WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ |
WFD_TW WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ |
|
| Q4j - Description of spatial scope | Monitoring is carried out in accordance to the HELCOM methods, described in Monitoring programme description, paper report, 16-17 pages |
Monitoring is carried out in accordance to the HELCOM methods, described in Monitoring programme description, paper report, 16-17 pages |
Soft bottom macrozoobenthos monitoring is carried out in coastal waters and off-shore areas (coordinated within HELCOM; see HELCOM Monitoring Manual; http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual). |
Monitoring is carried out in all coastal water bodies and off-shore areas (coordinated within HELCOM; see HELCOM Monitoring Manual; http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Monitoring is carried out in all coastal water bodies and off-shore areas (coordinated within HELCOM; see HELCOM Monitoring Manual; http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual), described in Monitoring programme paper report, 52-57 pages |
Monitoring is carried out in all coastal water bodies and off-shore areas (coordinated within HELCOM; see HELCOM Monitoring Manual; http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual), described in Monitoring programme description, paper report, 44-51 pages |
Monitoring is carried out in all coastal water bodies and off-shore areas (coordinated within HELCOM; see HELCOM Monitoring Manual; http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual), described in Monitoring programme paper report, 44-52 pages |
|
| Marine Unit IDs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q4h - Temporal scope | Start date- End date | 1992-9999 |
1992-9999 |
1981-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1972-9999 |
1972-9999 |
| Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q9c - Monitoring method | Method described in Monitoring programme, text-based paper report. |
Method described in Monitoring programme, text-based paper report. |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
|
| Q9d - Description of alteration to method | ||||||||
| Q9e - Quality assurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q9f - Quality control | DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
|
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - Proportion of area covered % | |||||||
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - No. of samples | |||||||
| Q9i - Description of sample representivity | Data is collected every year, in approx 17 sites |
In coastal water bodies sampling is carried out 7 times a year, every year; in other coastal stations, territorial waters 3-4 times a year; in the off-shore areas 1-2 times a year (research vessel based monitoring) |
Research vessel based data are collected; |
Research vessel based data are collected |
Research vessel based data are collected; |
|||
| Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data | ||||||||
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data type | UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
ProcessedData |
ProcessedData |
ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
ProcessedData |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access mechanism | URLdownload |
URLdownload |
LocationInternationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
LocationInternationalDC |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access rights | Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - INSPIRE standard | ManagementZonesReportingUnits |
ManagementZonesReportingUnits |
SpeciesDistribution |
SpeciesDistribution |
OceanographicFeatures |
OceanographicFeatures |
OceanographicFeatures |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c Date data are available | 2014-12 |
2014-12 |
1982-01 |
1980-12 |
1980-12 |
2011-06 |
1972-12 |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data update frequency | Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
| Q10d - Description of data access | Gathered monitoring data is stored in databases at Environmental Protection Agency and Nature Research Centre (http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/). |
Gathered monitoring data is stored in databases at Environmental Protection Agency and Nature Research Centre (http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/). |
Gathered data can be accessed at Environmental Protection Agency |
Gathered data can be accessed at Environmental Protection Agency |
Gathered data can be accessed at Environmental Protection Agency |
Gathered data can be accessed at Environmental Protection Agency |
Gathered data can be accessed at Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Descriptor |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
In accordance with the State Environmental Monitoring Programme 2018-2023, the following elements that characterise the integrity of the seabed shall be investigated in Lithuanian marine waters: Macrozoobenthos, macrophytes (macrophytobentos).
Macrozoobenthos shall be analysed annually at 15 stations, 1 once a year. In the other 4 sites, the investigations are conducted extensively. The abundance, biomass and species composition of the macrozoobenthos shall be determined. Macrophytes are monitored at 4 sites in the Baltic Sea, 1 times every 2 years, taking into account the species composition, abundance and biomass of macrophytes. The research sites shall be located at sea in such a way as to reflect the main impacts in the sea area (Busing oil terminal, urban waste water dischargers, area of the flower Curonian Lagoon), covering all known macrophyte growing areas on the coast and different types of sediment.
On the basis of the data collected, the indicators for D6/D5 descriptors characterising the status of the marine area are assessed as follows: 1) Bentos Quality Index (BQI)
|
In accordance with the State Environmental Monitoring Programme 2018-2023, the following elements that characterise the integrity of the seabed shall be investigated in Lithuanian marine waters: Macrozoobenthos, macrophytes (macrophytobentos).
Macrozoobenthos shall be analysed annually at 15 stations, 1 once a year. In the other 4 sites, the investigations are conducted extensively. The abundance, biomass and species composition of the macrozoobenthos shall be determined. Macrophytes are monitored at 4 sites in the Baltic Sea, 1 times every 2 years, taking into account the species composition, abundance and biomass of macrophytes. The research sites shall be located at sea in such a way as to reflect the main impacts in the sea area (Busing oil terminal, urban waste water dischargers, area of the flower Curonian Lagoon), covering all known macrophyte growing areas on the coast and different types of sediment.
On the basis of the data collected, the indicators for D6/D5 descriptors characterising the status of the marine area are assessed as follows: 1) Bentos Quality Index (BQI)
|
In accordance with the State Environmental Monitoring Programme 2018-2023, the following elements that characterise the integrity of the seabed shall be investigated in Lithuanian marine waters: Macrozoobenthos, macrophytes (macrophytobentos).
Macrozoobenthos shall be analysed annually at 15 stations, 1 once a year. In the other 4 sites, the investigations are conducted extensively. The abundance, biomass and species composition of the macrozoobenthos shall be determined. Macrophytes are monitored at 4 sites in the Baltic Sea, 1 times every 2 years, taking into account the species composition, abundance and biomass of macrophytes. The research sites shall be located at sea in such a way as to reflect the main impacts in the sea area (Busing oil terminal, urban waste water dischargers, area of the flower Curonian Lagoon), covering all known macrophyte growing areas on the coast and different types of sediment.
On the basis of the data collected, the indicators for D6/D5 descriptors characterising the status of the marine area are assessed as follows: 1) Bentos Quality Index (BQI)
|
In accordance with the State Environmental Monitoring Programme 2018-2023, the following elements that characterise the integrity of the seabed shall be investigated in Lithuanian marine waters: Macrozoobenthos, macrophytes (macrophytobentos).
Macrozoobenthos shall be analysed annually at 15 stations, 1 once a year. In the other 4 sites, the investigations are conducted extensively. The abundance, biomass and species composition of the macrozoobenthos shall be determined. Macrophytes are monitored at 4 sites in the Baltic Sea, 1 times every 2 years, taking into account the species composition, abundance and biomass of macrophytes. The research sites shall be located at sea in such a way as to reflect the main impacts in the sea area (Busing oil terminal, urban waste water dischargers, area of the flower Curonian Lagoon), covering all known macrophyte growing areas on the coast and different types of sediment.
On the basis of the data collected, the indicators for D6/D5 descriptors characterising the status of the marine area are assessed as follows: 1) Bentos Quality Index (BQI)
|
In accordance with the State Environmental Monitoring Programme 2018-2023, the following elements that characterise the integrity of the seabed shall be investigated in Lithuanian marine waters: Macrozoobenthos, macrophytes (macrophytobentos).
Macrozoobenthos shall be analysed annually at 15 stations, 1 once a year. In the other 4 sites, the investigations are conducted extensively. The abundance, biomass and species composition of the macrozoobenthos shall be determined. Macrophytes are monitored at 4 sites in the Baltic Sea, 1 times every 2 years, taking into account the species composition, abundance and biomass of macrophytes. The research sites shall be located at sea in such a way as to reflect the main impacts in the sea area (Busing oil terminal, urban waste water dischargers, area of the flower Curonian Lagoon), covering all known macrophyte growing areas on the coast and different types of sediment.
On the basis of the data collected, the indicators for D6/D5 descriptors characterising the status of the marine area are assessed as follows: 1) Bentos Quality Index (BQI)
|
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Gaps and plans |
Monitoring gaps and solutions:
1) The current monitoring of benthic habitats for methodological reasons does not properly assess solid seabed habitats, and Lithuania therefore plans to carry out a study in 2021 @-@ 2023 which will produce a detailed monitoring plan for reef habitats and macrophytes belonging to the NATURA 2000 network, a monitoring exercise and an assessment of the state and impacts of the Baltic Sea.
2) Lithuania has been implementing a 24-month project since 2019 to assess the impact of fishing bottom trawling on the integrity of the Baltic Sea. The study will include an analysis of the intensity and spatial distribution of trawling, an assessment of the impact on benthic communities and the status of habitats, the development of a macrozoobenthos quality index indicator to assess soft benthic communities and recommendations, and methodological guidance for assessing the impact of bottom trawling on seabed integrity.
|
Monitoring gaps and solutions:
1) The current monitoring of benthic habitats for methodological reasons does not properly assess solid seabed habitats, and Lithuania therefore plans to carry out a study in 2021 @-@ 2023 which will produce a detailed monitoring plan for reef habitats and macrophytes belonging to the NATURA 2000 network, a monitoring exercise and an assessment of the state and impacts of the Baltic Sea.
2) Lithuania has been implementing a 24-month project since 2019 to assess the impact of fishing bottom trawling on the integrity of the Baltic Sea. The study will include an analysis of the intensity and spatial distribution of trawling, an assessment of the impact on benthic communities and the status of habitats, the development of a macrozoobenthos quality index indicator to assess soft benthic communities and recommendations, and methodological guidance for assessing the impact of bottom trawling on seabed integrity.
|
Monitoring gaps and solutions:
1) The current monitoring of benthic habitats for methodological reasons does not properly assess solid seabed habitats, and Lithuania therefore plans to carry out a study in 2021 @-@ 2023 which will produce a detailed monitoring plan for reef habitats and macrophytes belonging to the NATURA 2000 network, a monitoring exercise and an assessment of the state and impacts of the Baltic Sea.
2) Lithuania has been implementing a 24-month project since 2019 to assess the impact of fishing bottom trawling on the integrity of the Baltic Sea. The study will include an analysis of the intensity and spatial distribution of trawling, an assessment of the impact on benthic communities and the status of habitats, the development of a macrozoobenthos quality index indicator to assess soft benthic communities and recommendations, and methodological guidance for assessing the impact of bottom trawling on seabed integrity.
|
Monitoring gaps and solutions:
1) The current monitoring of benthic habitats for methodological reasons does not properly assess solid seabed habitats, and Lithuania therefore plans to carry out a study in 2021 @-@ 2023 which will produce a detailed monitoring plan for reef habitats and macrophytes belonging to the NATURA 2000 network, a monitoring exercise and an assessment of the state and impacts of the Baltic Sea.
2) Lithuania has been implementing a 24-month project since 2019 to assess the impact of fishing bottom trawling on the integrity of the Baltic Sea. The study will include an analysis of the intensity and spatial distribution of trawling, an assessment of the impact on benthic communities and the status of habitats, the development of a macrozoobenthos quality index indicator to assess soft benthic communities and recommendations, and methodological guidance for assessing the impact of bottom trawling on seabed integrity.
|
Monitoring gaps and solutions:
1) The current monitoring of benthic habitats for methodological reasons does not properly assess solid seabed habitats, and Lithuania therefore plans to carry out a study in 2021 @-@ 2023 which will produce a detailed monitoring plan for reef habitats and macrophytes belonging to the NATURA 2000 network, a monitoring exercise and an assessment of the state and impacts of the Baltic Sea.
2) Lithuania has been implementing a 24-month project since 2019 to assess the impact of fishing bottom trawling on the integrity of the Baltic Sea. The study will include an analysis of the intensity and spatial distribution of trawling, an assessment of the impact on benthic communities and the status of habitats, the development of a macrozoobenthos quality index indicator to assess soft benthic communities and recommendations, and methodological guidance for assessing the impact of bottom trawling on seabed integrity.
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Related measures |
|||||
Coverage of measures |
|||||
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
BALLT-D01256_Macrozoobenthos |
BALLT-D0156_SeabedVegetation |
BALLT-D0156_SeabedVegetation |
BALLT-D0167_SeabedPhys |
BALLT-D0167_SeabedPhys |
Programme name |
BALLT-D01256_Macrozoobenthos |
BALLT-D0156_SeabedVegetation |
BALLT-D0156_SeabedVegetation |
BALLT-D0167_SeabedPhys |
BALLT-D0167_SeabedPhys |
Update type |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|||||
Programme description |
BAL-LT-AA-02
|
One is the area of the spread of the Curonian Lagoon waters in the Baltic Sea.
The data are used to assess eutrophication of BAL-LT-AA-01 and BAL-LT-AA-02 areas under the Common Water Policy Directive under D5 and D6.
The D5/D6 indicator is measured on the basis of the data collected: Maximum depth of distribution of Furcellaria lumbricalis.
|
One is the area of the spread of the Curonian Lagoon waters in the Baltic Sea.
The data are used to assess eutrophication of BAL-LT-AA-01 and BAL-LT-AA-02 areas under the Common Water Policy Directive under D5 and D6.
The D5/D6 indicator is measured on the basis of the data collected: Maximum depth of distribution of Furcellaria lumbricalis.
|
BALLT-D0167_SeabedPhys includes the extent of the adverse effects of physical disturbance on each habitat type in each assessment site in accordance with criterion D6C3. The extent of disturbance (km² and %) in each habitat is assessed by covering the strata of the main habitat types with the spatial area of physical disturbance.
The largest extent of physical disturbance to the seabed in Lithuanian marine territory is related to bottom trawl fisheries (measured according to Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) data). Other physical disturbance activities include burial and inshore sanding for the maintenance of beaches. Data on physical disturbance activities in the Lithuanian maritime area are obtained from reports from economic operators and scientific studies.
Lithuania has been implementing a 24-month project since 2019 to assess the impact of fishing bottom trawling on the integrity of the Baltic seabed. The study will include an analysis of the intensity and spatial distribution of trawling, an assessment of the impact on benthic communities and the status of habitats, the development of a macrozoobenthos quality index indicator to assess soft benthic communities and recommendations, and methodological guidance for assessing the impact of bottom trawling on seabed integrity.
The data are used to assess the status of the areas of BAL-LT-AA-01 and BAL-LT-AA-03 and the impact of human activities in accordance with D6.
D6 indicators are measured on the basis of the data collected: 1. Area in the habitat of the grunt damping and sand excavation area
|
BALLT-D0167_SeabedPhys includes the extent of the adverse effects of physical disturbance on each habitat type in each assessment site in accordance with criterion D6C3. The extent of disturbance (km² and %) in each habitat is assessed by covering the strata of the main habitat types with the spatial area of physical disturbance.
The largest extent of physical disturbance to the seabed in Lithuanian marine territory is related to bottom trawl fisheries (measured according to Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) data). Other physical disturbance activities include burial and inshore sanding for the maintenance of beaches. Data on physical disturbance activities in the Lithuanian maritime area are obtained from reports from economic operators and scientific studies.
Lithuania has been implementing a 24-month project since 2019 to assess the impact of fishing bottom trawling on the integrity of the Baltic seabed. The study will include an analysis of the intensity and spatial distribution of trawling, an assessment of the impact on benthic communities and the status of habitats, the development of a macrozoobenthos quality index indicator to assess soft benthic communities and recommendations, and methodological guidance for assessing the impact of bottom trawling on seabed integrity.
The data are used to assess the status of the areas of BAL-LT-AA-01 and BAL-LT-AA-03 and the impact of human activities in accordance with D6.
D6 indicators are measured on the basis of the data collected: 1. Area in the habitat of the grunt damping and sand excavation area
|
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
|||||
Monitoring details |
Zoobenthos shall be sampled on the basis of the HELCOM procedure, the Van Veen type primer (sampling area 0,1 m²), the Grunt samples have been washed through a sieve (the diameter of the eyes 0,5 mm) and the samples shall be recorded with 4 % formaldehyde solution. Samples are analysed by microscopy, gravimetric.
|
The weight shall be expressed in units of wet weight/m². A digital video camera (integrated into a sealed beam) performs the analysis of video images in a slow viewing mode in a laboratory. Video images assess the sediment composition (species, pebbles, gravel, sand), their average percentage and average coverage with macrophytobenthos species.
|
The weight shall be expressed in units of wet weight/m². A digital video camera (integrated into a sealed beam) performs the analysis of video images in a slow viewing mode in a laboratory. Video images assess the sediment composition (species, pebbles, gravel, sand), their average percentage and average coverage with macrophytobenthos species.
|
||
Features |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
|
Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
GES criteria |
D5C8 |
D5C7 |
D6C3 |
D6C2 |
D6C3 |
Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
Parameter Other |
gausumas ir biomasė |
augimo gylis, biomasė |
|||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
1981-9999 |
2007-9999 |
2007-9999 |
2012-9999 |
2012-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
Yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
Other |
Other |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines |
||
Quality control |
The quality of the analyses carried out by the Environmental Protection Agency in the laboratory work shall be ensured in accordance with the requirements of LST EN ISO/IEC 17025.
Comparative studies are carried out to ensure data quality, data are compared to multi-annual trends, and exclusions are sought.
|
Macrophytobenthos monitoring shall be carried out in accordance with LST EN ISO 19493:2007, HELCOM methodology. Diving Instructors shall be carried out in accordance with the Diving Instructors (professional Association of diving Instructors) rules. Experts participate in joint HELCOM working groups.
|
Macrophytobenthos monitoring shall be carried out in accordance with LST EN ISO 19493:2007, HELCOM methodology. Diving Instructors shall be carried out in accordance with the Diving Instructors (professional Association of diving Instructors) rules. Experts participate in joint HELCOM working groups.
|
Macrophytobenthos monitoring shall be carried out in accordance with LST EN ISO 19493:2007, HELCOM methodology. Diving Instructors shall be carried out in accordance with the Diving Instructors (professional Association of diving Instructors) rules. Comparative studies shall be carried out to ensure the quality of Zoobentos data and control charts shall be drawn up. Experts participate in HELCOM working groups (ExpertNetwork on benthic habitats). Services are procured to assess the effects of physical disturbance on habitats. The aim is to ensure the quality of investigations by raising high qualification requirements for researchers (work experience, permits for such activities, use of common methodologies widely used).
|
Macrophytobenthos monitoring shall be carried out in accordance with LST EN ISO 19493:2007, HELCOM methodology. Diving Instructors shall be carried out in accordance with the Diving Instructors (professional Association of diving Instructors) rules. Comparative studies shall be carried out to ensure the quality of Zoobentos data and control charts shall be drawn up. Experts participate in HELCOM working groups (ExpertNetwork on benthic habitats). Services are procured to assess the effects of physical disturbance on habitats. The aim is to ensure the quality of investigations by raising high qualification requirements for researchers (work experience, permits for such activities, use of common methodologies widely used).
|
Data management |
The data are stored in the Environmental Protection Agencyâs database. Used to assess the state of the marine environment under the Common Water Policy Directive, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, monitoring multi-annual trends. To be provided annually to ICES. Requests shall be made available to the public, legal persons (requests sent to the Environmental Protection Agency (www.gamta.lt) by e-mail to).
|
The data are compiled in the database of the Lithuanian Environmental Protection Agency and the Institute for Maritime Research of the University of KlaipÄda http://apc.ku.lt/en/. Used to assess the status of coastal and transitional waters in terms of WFD, the state of the marine environment under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, monitoring multi-annual trends. Submitted to HELCOM.
|
The data are compiled in the database of the Lithuanian Environmental Protection Agency and the Institute for Maritime Research of the University of KlaipÄda http://apc.ku.lt/en/. Used to assess the status of coastal and transitional waters in terms of WFD, the state of the marine environment under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, monitoring multi-annual trends. Submitted to HELCOM.
|
The data are compiled in the database of the Lithuanian Environmental Protection Agency and the Institute for Maritime Research of the University of KlaipÄda http://apc.ku.lt/en/. Used to assess the status of coastal and transitional waters in terms of WFD, the state of the marine environment under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, monitoring multi-annual trends. Submitted to HELCOM.
|
The data are compiled in the database of the Lithuanian Environmental Protection Agency and the Institute for Maritime Research of the University of KlaipÄda http://apc.ku.lt/en/. Used to assess the status of coastal and transitional waters in terms of WFD, the state of the marine environment under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, monitoring multi-annual trends. Submitted to HELCOM.
|
Data access |
|||||
Related indicator/name |
|||||
Contact |
|||||
References |